02.04.2013 Views

On the non-Aryan languages of India

On the non-Aryan languages of India

On the non-Aryan languages of India

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24<br />

ON THE NOX-ARTAN LANGUAGES OF INDIA.<br />

specimens whicli show <strong>the</strong> conjugation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> verb, and<br />

<strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> simple type <strong>of</strong> verb, and differ, <strong>the</strong>refore, in<br />

this respect from <strong>the</strong> Kuki and Khyeng. Kumi has <strong>the</strong><br />

tjqDical sex-affix, as in tchi-po ' a son,* distinguished from<br />

tchi-mi * a daughter.' In Mru we have ungcha ' a son,' and<br />

ungcha-ma ' a daughter.'<br />

The last class to be mentioned is <strong>the</strong> Karen, Class XIX.<br />

There are eight dialects, namely, Sgau, Bghai, Red Karen,<br />

Pwo, Taru, Mopgha, Kay or Gaikho, and Toungthu. The<br />

Karen differs in some important respects from all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

classes ; in fact, it is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most doubtful members <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> group. The structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sentence is different, <strong>the</strong><br />

accusative comes after <strong>the</strong> verb instead <strong>of</strong> preceding it, as in<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r classes. The most remarkable distinctions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Karen, however, are its numerous tones, five in number,<br />

which are constantly employed, and turn speaking into<br />

chanting. Yet Karen is certainly Tibeto-Burman in its<br />

vocabulary, and also in <strong>the</strong> position it assigns to <strong>the</strong> quali-<br />

fying noun before <strong>the</strong> qualified. Besides its use <strong>of</strong> tones,<br />

Karen distinguishes <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> words by adding<br />

significant determinative words instead <strong>of</strong> unmeaning deter-<br />

minative syllables; thus in <strong>the</strong> Sgau dialect, it says hticie<br />

hto * dog-hog' for 'dog,' hto hoan 'hog-fowl' for 'hog.'<br />

The verb is <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> simple type, but while <strong>the</strong> pronoun<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first and second persons precedes <strong>the</strong> verb, that <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> third person follows; thus ya au 'I eat,' na au 'thou<br />

eatest,' au we 'eats he,' pd au 'we eat,' thu an, 'ye eat,'<br />

au we ' eat <strong>the</strong>y.' In <strong>the</strong> passive voice, besides a special<br />

suffix i/ui, <strong>the</strong> first and second pronouns are repeated after<br />

<strong>the</strong> verb, as ya au ya tha ' I am eaten '<br />

; ma prefixed makes<br />

an intransitive verb transitive. In <strong>the</strong> perfect tense li is<br />

affixed, for <strong>the</strong> future ka prefixed. O<strong>the</strong>r relations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

verb are expressed by a great number <strong>of</strong> prefixed and affixed<br />

particles, and <strong>the</strong>se describe with excessive minuteness all <strong>the</strong><br />

circumstances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> action : a, a form <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> third personal<br />

pronoun, as before stated, expresses <strong>the</strong> genitive relation : au<br />

' with ' or ' from,' and leu ' with ' or ' by,' are prepositions.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r relations are expressed by leu preceding and ano<strong>the</strong>r

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!