CHOICE OF SCHEME FOR CLASSIFICATION - Indian Statistical ...
CHOICE OF SCHEME FOR CLASSIFICATION - Indian Statistical ...
CHOICE OF SCHEME FOR CLASSIFICATION - Indian Statistical ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
with the certitude that the Universe of Subjects too would have been thereby attended to<br />
automatically.<br />
5.5.3 Comparison of CC and UDC<br />
CC can be compared only with UDC. It is like UDC in that it is a Faceted Scheme.<br />
But it differs from UDC in the following respects:<br />
1. CC is a Freely Faceted Classification, whereas UDC is only a Nearly Faceted<br />
Classification;<br />
2. CC starts with a short schedule of Basic Classes, whereas UDC has not yet<br />
escaped from the grip of the rigid DC core and giving a Schedule of<br />
Compound Classes running to several hundred pages;<br />
3. CC is guided by definite objectively applicable principles and the need for<br />
flair is reduced to an enormous extent, whereas UDC still depends a good deal<br />
on subjective decisions instead of objective ones based on stated principles;<br />
4. CC has the advantage of six schedules of Common Isolates and of several<br />
Special Isolates for the Compound Subjects going with the respective Basic<br />
Subjects, whereas UDC has only three distinctive schedules of Common<br />
Isolates and its Schedules of Special Isolates are far too few and they very<br />
much mix up different kinds of isolates;<br />
5. CC has made full use of the advantages of a Mixed Notation, whereas UDC is still<br />
essentially in the grip of Indo-Arabic numerals;<br />
6. In CC, the sequence of the isolates in a schedule, the sequence of facets in a<br />
Compound Subject, and the sequence of the Compound Subjects going with the<br />
respective Basic Subjects conform much more to a common pattern than the<br />
subjects of UDC do;<br />
7. The Canonical Subjects of CC include the various Systems of Development of<br />
each Basic Subject and also the Specials going with each Basic Subject. This<br />
feature is rarely found in UDC; and<br />
8. On account of the large base of its Notational System and provision for any<br />
number of facets that may be determined by the Idea Plane, the average<br />
number of digits in CC numbers is smaller by 50 per cent than the average<br />
number of digits in a UDC Number (66). CC appears to be preferable to UDC.<br />
The members of the Odense Meeting have had no experience in working with<br />
CC. That is why they have not considered it.<br />
6 PLACES <strong>FOR</strong> NEW SUBJECTS<br />
6.1 Distinction Between Macro Subject and Micro Subject<br />
It is helpful to distinguish between a Macro Subject and a Micro Subject. Till the<br />
end of the nineteenth century, the designers of classification have been confining<br />
themselves to Macro Subjects — that is, subjects whose extension is large enough to need an