03.04.2013 Views

Untitled - African American History

Untitled - African American History

Untitled - African American History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WHAT IS SLAVERY. CCXXXVli<br />

fate, would do violence to the law of his nature, because<br />

his pursuit tends nothing to the great end of his exis-<br />

tence, the greatest happiness of which he is susceptible.<br />

And hence slavery may be utterly inconsistent with the<br />

law of nature when applied to one race of men, and yet<br />

be perfectly consistent with the nature of others. 1<br />

Again. We must be careful to distinguish between<br />

the state of nature and the law of nature. Many things<br />

are contrary to the state of nature, which are not<br />

contrary to the law of nature. Marriage, government,<br />

all civilization, is adverse to a state of nature, yet<br />

it would be hardly asserted, that thereby violence was<br />

done to the law of nature. A celebrated Scotch commentator<br />

applies this distinction clearly and philosophi-<br />

cally to the subject of slavery: "It is indeed contrary<br />

to the state of nature, by which all men were equal and<br />

free ; but it is not repugnant to the law of nature, which<br />

does not command men to remain in their native free-<br />

dom, nor forbid the preserving persons at the expense<br />

of their liberty," &c. 3<br />

Heineccius points out clearly the<br />

same distinction, for while with all writers on the civil<br />

law, he declares the natural freedom of all men, he<br />

adds: "Posset videri servitus juri nature repugnare;<br />

sed id, meritd negatur ; servitus enim, in se nihil aliud<br />

est, quam obligatio ad perpetuas operas. Si non injustum<br />

est obligari ad annuas operas, quidni et ad perpetuas<br />

?" 3<br />

"It may appear that slavery is repugnant to<br />

the law of nature; but that may be properly denied.<br />

For slavery in itself is nothing but an obligation for per-<br />

to be bound to serve<br />

petual service. If it be not wrong<br />

for a year, why not also for life ?" 4 And "<br />

again, Juri<br />

naturae, hujus modi servitus non repugnant, sed tarnen<br />

1<br />

Montesquieu, Spirit of Laws, Bk. XV, ch. viii.<br />

8 McDouall's Institutes, Bk. I,<br />

tit.<br />

2, $ 77, p. 66. Burlamaqui seems<br />

to favor this distinction, though not pointedly, in his Principles of Natu-<br />

ral Law, Pt. I, ch. iv, 11.<br />

8 Pralec. Ac. in H. Grot. Lib. II, cap. v, g 27.<br />

4 Heinec. Praelec. Ac. in H. Grot. Lib. II, cap. v, \ 27.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!