04.04.2013 Views

Christocentrism of Charism – Buggert - CarmelStream

Christocentrism of Charism – Buggert - CarmelStream

Christocentrism of Charism – Buggert - CarmelStream

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

and Mary must become fused. lxxvi<br />

No one image or statement can exhaustively express the centrality <strong>of</strong> Christ for Teresa. lxxvii<br />

He is a very good friend with whom we can identify in his own weakness and trials. In turn he is a<br />

good companion for he understands the human situation and knows "<strong>of</strong> what stuff we are made." lxxviii<br />

He is our brother who enables us to call God our Father. He is the way, the light, the master, the<br />

teacher, the one whom we are to imitate in his poverty, humility, compassion, suffering, forgiveness<br />

and love. But he is also the risen and glorified Christ indwelling within us and present for us in the<br />

Church and Eucharist. Ultimately he is the bride into whom the butterfly dies and becomes one.<br />

The <strong>Christocentrism</strong> <strong>of</strong> John <strong>of</strong> the Cross lxxix<br />

We saw above how for Teresa <strong>of</strong> Avila the humanity <strong>of</strong> Christ plays an essential role in all<br />

phases <strong>of</strong> the spiritual life so that every aspect <strong>of</strong> Christian life is Jesus-mediated. Is the same true<br />

for John <strong>of</strong> the Cross?<br />

Both Edwards and Barron point out that John has been criticized on this very point. lxxx No<br />

less a premier theologian than Karl Rahner has made this criticism. We saw above his defense <strong>of</strong><br />

Teresa. However, regarding John <strong>of</strong> the Cross, Rahner says the following in writing about the<br />

abiding mediatorial significance <strong>of</strong> the humanity <strong>of</strong> Jesus:<br />

Signs <strong>of</strong> the great difficulty <strong>of</strong> such a Christianization <strong>of</strong> the basic religious act<br />

directed towards God are to be seen even within the theory <strong>of</strong> Christian mysticism.<br />

This theory has always been tempted (even in St. John <strong>of</strong> the Cross) to let everything<br />

in the mystic act disappear in the face <strong>of</strong> God, so that over and over again subsequent<br />

corrections <strong>of</strong> such a basic start on a pantheistic basis were found to be necessary to<br />

enable the mystic to hold on to the fact that he may and can still occupy himself with<br />

the humanity <strong>of</strong> Christ. lxxxi<br />

That John <strong>of</strong> the Cross could so easily be misunderstood regarding his position concerning<br />

the role <strong>of</strong> the humanity <strong>of</strong> Jesus throughout all stages <strong>of</strong> the spiritual life is somewhat under-<br />

standable. Edwards indicates how certain writers point to John's "rejection <strong>of</strong> discursive thought and<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!