06.04.2013 Views

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Whither</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>?<br />

the need for peace and prosperity which has eluded the two countries<br />

ever since they became independent. The purpose is "to provide a mutual<br />

platform for debate on the major sticking points in the hitherto fickle<br />

peace dialogue on both sides of the border -- whether it is <strong>Kashmir</strong>, the<br />

water dispute or security.<br />

The mission statement commits the two media groups "to a<br />

movement that will bring the people and civil institutions of the two<br />

countries together in fostering an honourable, genuine and durable<br />

peace." This is a noble mission and needs to be pursued with all<br />

seriousness of purpose. While the ultimate aspirations of Aman ki Asha<br />

are admittedly lofty, the sponsors claim to have taken good care in<br />

factoring in realistic and deliverable means to ensure the sustainability of<br />

their peace endeavour.<br />

In its essence, the Aman ki Asha project involves an expansive<br />

[extensive] media diplomacy seeking "to resolve amicably all outstanding<br />

issues that serve as hurdles to peace, and campaign for collaboration on<br />

economic, cultural issues through a media-led civil society movement." In<br />

the India-Pakistan context, we have seen "media diplomacy" at work in<br />

different forms in recent years. Notably, Panos South Asia and the<br />

Kathmandu-based Hemal magazine have been organising a series of<br />

roundtables and retreats since 2002 for senior media practitioners to<br />

explore the modalities of reinforcing the peace process.<br />

One conclusion flagged in those discussions was that no foreign<br />

policy without popular support and consent can be sustainable or survive<br />

domestic political changes in the two countries. Indeed, the India-<br />

Pakistan peace process has never been immune to domestic and external<br />

factors and has always been vulnerable to occasional hiccups. We have<br />

seen that whenever the dialogue process, initiated in June 1997, appeared<br />

to be making headway, some bizarre incident took place derailing and<br />

then stalling the process.<br />

The latest is the November 2008 Mumbai tragedy, after which we<br />

were back to square one. The dialogue remains suspended despite two<br />

summit-level meetings, one in June last year at Yekaterinburg, Russia,<br />

and the other in the following month at the Egyptian resort of Sharm el-<br />

Sheikh. India and Pakistan seem to have inextricably tied themselves<br />

together in a straitjacket with each looking in the opposite direction.<br />

They do need help. The US is doing what it can to nudge both sides. But<br />

domestically, in the absence of popular momentum, both are held back<br />

by the extremity of their traditional trust deficit.<br />

5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!