06.04.2013 Views

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 IPRI Factfile<br />

share of assets to it, and Quaid-e-Azam Mohammad Ali Jinnah, while<br />

explaining his Two Nation Theory, proclaiming that he regarded Hindus<br />

as a great nation and their religion being equally great, and that his only<br />

contention was that the Muslims and Hindus were different and could<br />

not then be united under one political system. Jinnah was not communal<br />

or racist in his outlook, a fact that is now being increasingly realised in<br />

India.<br />

Politicians like L K Advani and Jaswant Singh and historians like H<br />

M Seervai and Dr Ajeet Jawed are discovering Jinnah as a non-communal<br />

and secular leader. If this is so, one may question why the partition<br />

entailed so much of bloodshed, riots and human misery? In fact, as the<br />

dust of emotions is settling down, it is increasingly becoming easier for<br />

the historians to have a better and more objective view of the past.<br />

Therefore, it is being realised that many of the problems which were<br />

believed to be the result of partition, such as the riots of partition,<br />

uprooting of twelve million people, the dispute over assets, the<br />

differences on the ownership of water resources, the issue of Rann of<br />

Katch, and problems in accession of the states, were, in fact, issues which<br />

should have been addressed as part of the partition package. It was the<br />

failure of the British colonial administration that it could not manage the<br />

process of partitioning the subcontinent amicably. Maulana Abul Kalam<br />

Azad holds that he had already briefed Mountbatten on the possibility of<br />

violent incidents but the latter claimed that being a soldier he would not<br />

hesitate in using the military and air force and would use tanks and<br />

airplanes to crush the riots if they erupted. His were just hollow<br />

statements.<br />

Though in the past six decades, some of the problems<br />

accompanying partition were partially or fully resolved by India and<br />

Pakistan bilaterally, the arbitration also proved helpful in some cases. For<br />

instance, the issue of river water was resolved through the World Bank<br />

assistance resulting in the Indus Basin Water Treaty, which was not ideal<br />

from the point of view of the either party. Yet it was accepted, as no<br />

other mutually agreed solution was possible. Likewise, the Rann of Katch<br />

issue was resolved in 1969 through the mediation of Britain. However,<br />

the <strong>Kashmir</strong> issue has remained unresolved. Pakistan and India fought<br />

two wars in 1947-48 and 1965 directly over <strong>Kashmir</strong>. Though the 1971<br />

war was fought due to the East Pakistan crisis, <strong>Kashmir</strong> was a crucial<br />

element in it and the subsequent Simla Agreement had implications for<br />

<strong>Kashmir</strong>. The 62 years saw the rise of nuclear ambitions in India and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!