06.04.2013 Views

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

120 Whither Kashmir? (Part II) - Islamabad Policy Research Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Whither</strong> <strong>Kashmir</strong>?<br />

British Foreign Secretary David Miliband who visited New Delhi<br />

and <strong>Islamabad</strong> in the post-Mumbai terror attacks had pointed out that<br />

complete de-escalation of situation between Pakistan and India was fully<br />

linked to resolution of <strong>Kashmir</strong> issue, saying that India should cooperate<br />

with Pakistan in this respect.<br />

Regarding the peaceful uprising of the <strong>Kashmir</strong>is, Washington Post<br />

wrote on August 28, 2008, “Despite the government’s use of force, many<br />

Muslims in Indian controlled <strong>Kashmir</strong> seem determined to find peaceful<br />

ways to voice their aspirations as the nonviolent movement by the<br />

unarmed protesters flourishes, especially among the young”.<br />

New critical situation has also affected other parts of India and its<br />

gravity could be judged from the fact that even Indian intellectuals have<br />

started favouring the independence of the occupied <strong>Kashmir</strong>.<br />

In its editorial, the editor of The Times of India wrote on<br />

August 17, 2008 “On August 15, India celebrated independence from<br />

the British Raj. A day symbolising the end of colonialism in India<br />

became a day, symbolising Indian colonialism in the Valley”.<br />

On August 16, 2008, Hindustan Times reported: “Nothing has<br />

really changed since 1990s. Indian forces are treated as an army of<br />

occupation. New Delhi is seen as the oppressor”.<br />

As a matter of fact, when <strong>Kashmir</strong>i people lost faith in the<br />

international community, which persisted in ignoring their liberation and<br />

when it became obvious that the Indian occupying forces would not<br />

vacate the controlled areas through political means, the peoples had no<br />

choice but to resort to armed struggle which was actually intensified in<br />

1989.<br />

World history proves that a few persons were never able to launch<br />

a successful freedom movement. And it always represents the aspirations<br />

of majority of people who struggle for independence. While judging in<br />

this context, the <strong>Kashmir</strong>is enjoy the support of all the intellectuals,<br />

religious scholars and common men who are determined to fight against<br />

the imperialist occupation of Indians.<br />

World history proves that wars of liberation in connection with<br />

various nations were their reaction against misrule and subjugation<br />

perpetrated by alien powers. In the 20th century, a majority of the Third<br />

World countries got independence after an armed struggle against the<br />

colonial powers. Even independence of the United States, unification of<br />

Germany and Italy became possible after an armed struggle. So, question<br />

arises that “were the peoples of these countries terrorists at that time?<br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!