07.04.2013 Views

30. Furan-Based Adhesives

30. Furan-Based Adhesives

30. Furan-Based Adhesives

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recently, Schneider et al. [47] fabricated particleboards using poly2–urea–formaldehyde<br />

adhesives (P2-U-F). They observed that the curing time needed for P2-U-F was<br />

double that necessary for classical urea–formaldehyde resins. They also established that<br />

P2-U-F produced boards with lower strength properties, but with higher water resistance,<br />

if classical processing conditions were used. However, at higher resin contents, P2-U-F<br />

gave boards with better mechanical properties. The following optimal conditions were<br />

derived to produce particleboards: a blending time of 10 min, a press platen temperature<br />

of 150 C, 15% of P2-U-F resin with respect to OD softwood, 1.4 min of pressing time per<br />

millimeter thickness, and a board density of 0.67 kg/dm 3 .<br />

Dao and Zavarin [48,49] prepared boards using wood powder and 2 or poly2 as<br />

binders. The wood species was white fir (Abies concolor) which was used as powder<br />

screened to 80 mesh. Compound 2, poly2, and wood were subjected to chemical activation<br />

with hydrogen peroxide/ferrous ions or nitric acid. It was established that an increase in<br />

the degree of polymerization of poly2 yielded boards with increased strength properties<br />

and that poly2 gave materials with higher strength and water resistance properties than<br />

those obtained using 2. They also showed that the addition of the activator to poly2, rather<br />

than to wood, was more efficient. Finally, they also isolated the acetone-soluble fraction of<br />

poly2 (about 73%) and used it as a binder for the same wood samples. They found that the<br />

tensile properties of the corresponding boards exceeded, by over 50%, those of composites<br />

prepared with conventional phenol–resorcinol–formaldehyde resins.<br />

Abd El Mohsen et al. [50] modified classical urea–formaldehyde resins by adding<br />

different amounts of 2 and used them as binders for beech-based plywoods. These modified<br />

resins gave materials with higher shear strength properties (100% increase) in<br />

comparison to unmodified adhesives. They also established the following optimal<br />

formulations: addition of 30, 45, and 60% of 2 to classical urea–formaldehyde resins<br />

and 3, 4.5, and 6% of p-toluene sulfonic acid as a hardener, respectively. Coppock [51]<br />

prepared durable wood adhesives from furfural-based diols, diamines, and diisocyanates.<br />

She then made plywoods or particleboards using modified urea–formaldehyde resins, with<br />

3 and 4 as binders and found that the materials thus obtained showed acceptable mechanical<br />

properties. These properties were not improved by the addition of further modifiers,<br />

such as 5,5 0 -ethylidene furfuryl amine (18). Measurements using DSC showed that 3 did<br />

not react under alkaline conditions, but readily resinified at pH values below 3.0. These<br />

materials were found to have lower formaldehyde emission compared with those made<br />

with unmodified resins. The mechanical performances of flakeboards made with 14<br />

exceeded the industrial standard requirements and were equivalent to those prepared<br />

using MDI. Finally, materials based on 14 in the presence of 3 or 18 as modifiers were<br />

obtained and found to have better performances in comparison to those prepared without<br />

these additives.<br />

Suzuki et al. [52] prepared wood-meal/plastic composites with an average thickness of<br />

4 mm using urea–2 and phenol–1 resins as binders. The molar ratio between urea and 2 was<br />

varied from 9:1 to 1:9. The amount of formaldehyde emission decreased with increasing<br />

Copyright © 2003 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!