30. Furan-Based Adhesives
30. Furan-Based Adhesives
30. Furan-Based Adhesives
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Recently, Schneider et al. [47] fabricated particleboards using poly2–urea–formaldehyde<br />
adhesives (P2-U-F). They observed that the curing time needed for P2-U-F was<br />
double that necessary for classical urea–formaldehyde resins. They also established that<br />
P2-U-F produced boards with lower strength properties, but with higher water resistance,<br />
if classical processing conditions were used. However, at higher resin contents, P2-U-F<br />
gave boards with better mechanical properties. The following optimal conditions were<br />
derived to produce particleboards: a blending time of 10 min, a press platen temperature<br />
of 150 C, 15% of P2-U-F resin with respect to OD softwood, 1.4 min of pressing time per<br />
millimeter thickness, and a board density of 0.67 kg/dm 3 .<br />
Dao and Zavarin [48,49] prepared boards using wood powder and 2 or poly2 as<br />
binders. The wood species was white fir (Abies concolor) which was used as powder<br />
screened to 80 mesh. Compound 2, poly2, and wood were subjected to chemical activation<br />
with hydrogen peroxide/ferrous ions or nitric acid. It was established that an increase in<br />
the degree of polymerization of poly2 yielded boards with increased strength properties<br />
and that poly2 gave materials with higher strength and water resistance properties than<br />
those obtained using 2. They also showed that the addition of the activator to poly2, rather<br />
than to wood, was more efficient. Finally, they also isolated the acetone-soluble fraction of<br />
poly2 (about 73%) and used it as a binder for the same wood samples. They found that the<br />
tensile properties of the corresponding boards exceeded, by over 50%, those of composites<br />
prepared with conventional phenol–resorcinol–formaldehyde resins.<br />
Abd El Mohsen et al. [50] modified classical urea–formaldehyde resins by adding<br />
different amounts of 2 and used them as binders for beech-based plywoods. These modified<br />
resins gave materials with higher shear strength properties (100% increase) in<br />
comparison to unmodified adhesives. They also established the following optimal<br />
formulations: addition of 30, 45, and 60% of 2 to classical urea–formaldehyde resins<br />
and 3, 4.5, and 6% of p-toluene sulfonic acid as a hardener, respectively. Coppock [51]<br />
prepared durable wood adhesives from furfural-based diols, diamines, and diisocyanates.<br />
She then made plywoods or particleboards using modified urea–formaldehyde resins, with<br />
3 and 4 as binders and found that the materials thus obtained showed acceptable mechanical<br />
properties. These properties were not improved by the addition of further modifiers,<br />
such as 5,5 0 -ethylidene furfuryl amine (18). Measurements using DSC showed that 3 did<br />
not react under alkaline conditions, but readily resinified at pH values below 3.0. These<br />
materials were found to have lower formaldehyde emission compared with those made<br />
with unmodified resins. The mechanical performances of flakeboards made with 14<br />
exceeded the industrial standard requirements and were equivalent to those prepared<br />
using MDI. Finally, materials based on 14 in the presence of 3 or 18 as modifiers were<br />
obtained and found to have better performances in comparison to those prepared without<br />
these additives.<br />
Suzuki et al. [52] prepared wood-meal/plastic composites with an average thickness of<br />
4 mm using urea–2 and phenol–1 resins as binders. The molar ratio between urea and 2 was<br />
varied from 9:1 to 1:9. The amount of formaldehyde emission decreased with increasing<br />
Copyright © 2003 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC