07.04.2013 Views

Southern planter - The W&M Digital Archive

Southern planter - The W&M Digital Archive

Southern planter - The W&M Digital Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

438 THE SOUTHERN PLANTER. [July<br />

produce a dog, a bitch produce a lamb,<br />

&c. ; but it must be accompanied in our<br />

mind with another law, tho law of varia-<br />

tion. <strong>The</strong> child is not always like its parent<br />

in every respect, and sometimes not<br />

like its species, as when a lamb has two<br />

heads or six legs, &c, as we often find.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n we call it a monster. This diversity<br />

forms the problem of hereditary influence,<br />

and it is for the causes of, and reasons for,<br />

the variation that the breeder must en-<br />

quire, and make himself acquainted with,<br />

so that he may, as far as possible, modify<br />

them. One of the causes of variation is<br />

what is called " breeding back." It is of-<br />

ten a source of disappointment to the<br />

breeder that when he puts a well-formed<br />

female and a well-formed male, he gets an<br />

ill-formed colt or calf, and of quite a differ-<br />

ent colour to what he expected. If you enquire<br />

into the pedigree of the parents you<br />

will find the child answering in every re-<br />

spect to the description of an ancestor.<br />

This is the law of atavism. It is this that<br />

makes many say that horse-breeding is a<br />

lottery. However, if you breed properly<br />

you have little to fear. Pure and thoroughbred<br />

animals comparatively seldom breed<br />

back, or disappoint their owners in doing<br />

so. By thorough-bred is meant those<br />

whose ancestors were for a long time of<br />

the same shape, and adapted for the same<br />

purpose as themselves. <strong>The</strong> more the animals<br />

have been crossed the more subject<br />

are they to breed back, and more the dif-<br />

ference in shape in crossing the more likely<br />

is breeding back to prove a disappointment.<br />

A case was related to illustrate this law.<br />

How is it to be explained ? <strong>The</strong> " Westminster<br />

Review" very properly says, " It<br />

is to be explained on the supposition that<br />

the qualities were transmitted from the<br />

grandfather to the father (the other sex<br />

may convey it equally well,) in whom they<br />

remain latent or were marked by the presence<br />

of some antagonistic or controlling in-<br />

fluence, and thence transmitted to the son,<br />

in whom the antagonistic influence being<br />

withdrawn they manifest themselves. Mr.<br />

Singer, let us say, has a remarkable aptitude<br />

for music, but the influence of Mrs.<br />

Singer is such that the children, inheriting<br />

her imperfect ear, manifest no musical talent<br />

whatever. <strong>The</strong>se children, however, have<br />

inherited the disposition of their father in<br />

spite of its non-manifestation ; and if, when<br />

they transmit what in them is latent, the<br />

influence of their wives is favourable, the<br />

grand-children may turn out musically<br />

gifted. In the same way consumption or<br />

insanity and other hereditary diseases seem<br />

to lie dormant for a generation or more,<br />

and in the next flashes out with the same<br />

fury as of old." This should make you<br />

very careful in breeding stock, and to as-<br />

certain that not only the sire and dam are<br />

free from spavin, curbs, &c, but that their<br />

ancestors were not subject to any hereditary<br />

affection, and not only that they were<br />

free from hereditary evils, but that they<br />

possess the same good qualities, and are<br />

adapted for the same purpose as them-<br />

selves. Several very beautiful, instructive,<br />

and interesting illustrations were produced<br />

to prove that diseases arising from accident,<br />

as well as constitutional idiosyncracy, curious<br />

tricks, acquired habits, vicious and peevish<br />

tempers, as well as good tempers, &c, were he-<br />

reditary, or transmissible from parent to off-<br />

spring. Now comes the vexed question,<br />

" Which has the predominating influence on<br />

the progeny, the male or the female parent ?<br />

If both parents join to form the child, does<br />

the parent give one group of organs and<br />

the other parent another group; or do both<br />

give all ?" This subject is so very inter-<br />

esting, and it is so important, that the<br />

breeder should come to some definite con-<br />

clusion upon it, that he felt justified in occupying<br />

a considerable part of their time<br />

in its investigation. Several great men<br />

were mentioned who maintain that the male<br />

parent furnishes the external configuration,<br />

or, in other words, the locomotive organs<br />

while the female parent gives the internal<br />

or vital organs, each absolutely independent<br />

of the other. Other equally celebrated ob-<br />

servers declare that it is quite the reverse,<br />

the female preponderates always in the locomotive<br />

organs, and the male in the vital<br />

organs. Others again, equally as eminent,<br />

assert that both theories are wrong ; that<br />

the male always gives external configuration<br />

or locomotive organs, and the female<br />

the internal or vital organs, but do not mean<br />

it to be inferred that either parent gives<br />

either set of organs uninfluenced by the<br />

other parent, but merely that the leading<br />

characteristics and qualities of both sets of<br />

qualities are due to the male on the one<br />

side and to the female on the other, the<br />

opposite parent modifying them only. He<br />

(Mr. Evans) believed they were all wrong<br />

—that the truth lies between them. He

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!