CHAPTER 2 2.0 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT - Department of ...
CHAPTER 2 2.0 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT - Department of ...
CHAPTER 2 2.0 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT - Department of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 2<br />
<strong>2.0</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>PHYSICAL</strong> <strong>ENVIRONMENT</strong><br />
2.1 Physical Environment<br />
This aspect <strong>of</strong> the document covers the biological environment, both marine and terrestrial; the<br />
physico-chemical environment, vis-à-vis issues <strong>of</strong> sea-bed conditions and water quality; the<br />
physical environment including issues <strong>of</strong> topographic, hydrographic and socio-cultural issues.<br />
2.1.1 Climatology<br />
Belize lies in the tropical to sub tropical belt with a pronounced wet and dry season even though<br />
there are significant variations in the weather patterns in the region. Mean annual temperatures<br />
range from 16-17°C in winter to 24-25°C in summer, in the South; and from 23-26°C in winter<br />
to 28-31°C in summer, in the North [See Fig. 2.6]. Mean annual precipitation fluctuates between<br />
1500mm to the north and 4000mm to the South. A dry season characterized by strong easterly<br />
winds, runs from January to February and May to June. Strong winter storms blow from October<br />
to February, <strong>of</strong>ten as 'northers' which bring cool temperatures, heavy rains, strong winds and<br />
rough seas. In the summer there are occasional strong squalls with winds up to 48kph. The<br />
hurricane season runs from June to November but peaks between August to October in Belize.<br />
Ambergris Caye, which is located in the subtropical moist ecological life zone <strong>of</strong> Belize, is the<br />
driest region <strong>of</strong> the country getting < 60” <strong>of</strong> rainfall per annum [See Fig. 2.1 & 2.6]. The caye<br />
has a bimodal rainfall pattern with the main dry season extending from December to May and a<br />
wet season from June to November, with the highest concentration <strong>of</strong> rainfall from September to<br />
November.<br />
This somewhat arbitrary division <strong>of</strong> the rainfall pattern is usually interrupted in August when<br />
there is normally a short dry spell. The evaporation rate is contingent on the seasonal patterns <strong>of</strong><br />
rainfall and humidity throughout the project corridor [See Fig 2.5c]. In the rainy season when<br />
there is high humidity, the evaporation rates are lower (about 80 mm. per month) to the dry<br />
season when they are significantly higher due to the lower humidity index <strong>of</strong> the atmosphere<br />
(approx. 160 mm. per month).<br />
Temperatures at Ambergris Caye show a slight seasonal variation with normal temperatures<br />
varying between 21.0º C and 3<strong>2.0</strong>º C. There is a more noticeable temperature difference between<br />
night time and daytime temperatures than between seasonal norms. At coastal locations,<br />
temperature differences are moderated by the warm <strong>of</strong>fshore waters. Nevertheless seasonal<br />
extremes can fall between 13.75º C and 35.75ºC. Temperature differences are <strong>of</strong>ten accompanied<br />
by a change in wind direction, with the predominant winds coming from the east and southeast in<br />
the warmer months but sometimes shifting to the north and northeast in the cooler season.<br />
2-1
Fig. 2.1: Belize Mean Annual Isoplets.<br />
2.1.2 Oceanography<br />
As part <strong>of</strong> the physical environment, the following oceanographic components are summarized<br />
as part <strong>of</strong> the receiving environment for the proposed btl FOC project. These components are<br />
directly related to the constant physical outline <strong>of</strong> the coastal areas <strong>of</strong> the aforementioned project.<br />
2.1.2.1 Regional Hydrographic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
Based on the hydrographic provinces (Purdy, 1966), the Ambergris Caye rests on the Barrier<br />
Platform. This is relevant to continental shelf in which the project site is located on the outer<br />
most ridges or shoal <strong>of</strong> such shelf. The area <strong>of</strong> the Continental Shelf running from the back-reef<br />
<strong>of</strong> the main barrier reef to the eastern shore line <strong>of</strong> cayes has been referred to by Purdy (1975) as<br />
the Barrier Lagoon.<br />
The waters between this first line <strong>of</strong> cayes, including Ambergris Caye, and the mainland have<br />
been referred to by Purdy (1975) as the Shelf lagoon. Purdy has sub -divided these Lagoonal<br />
2-2
systems on the basis <strong>of</strong> a Northern Shelf Lagoon and a Southern Shelf lagoon – the dividing<br />
point being at the Belize river delta in Belize City. The Northern shelf Lagoon running from<br />
Belize City to San Pedro and including the Chetumal Bay is relatively shallow with depths not<br />
exceeding three (3) fathoms.<br />
The Northern Shelf lagoon is shallow and flat, being interrupted by relict drainage channel and<br />
sinkholes caused by Pleistocene erosion (Purdy 1974; Scott 1966). One <strong>of</strong> these channels the<br />
English Caye or Eastern Channel, makes a deep undulating cut <strong>of</strong> about 30 meters in depth<br />
through the Barrier platform. This Channel probably represents an old streambed <strong>of</strong> either the<br />
Belize River or Sibun River. Other noted drainage channels in the reef includes – the Saint<br />
George’s Caye Channel and the Caye Caulker–Caye Chapel channel.<br />
2.1.2.2 Bathymetry<br />
There has been published data on the depth pr<strong>of</strong>ile and bathymetry <strong>of</strong> the proposed project area,<br />
which was done for the BEL Power II Project. The Tunich Nah Survey Team in its April and<br />
May site surveys did some limited work in this area. This survey was undertaken mainly to<br />
provide information in regards to the route <strong>of</strong> the FOC [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4] and to verify<br />
that the data collected for the BEL Power II project is still valid and could be utilized for this<br />
project.<br />
The oceanic bathymetry <strong>of</strong> the near shore environment near Ambergris Caye along the project<br />
corridor site is best described as a shallow lagoonal shelf (See Fig. 2.3 & 2.4). This description is<br />
not applicable for the southwestern portion <strong>of</strong> the general marine area that comprises the Boca<br />
Chica Canal (Hol Chan Marine Reserve boundary) which has depths <strong>of</strong> ten feet and with strong<br />
oceanic currents.<br />
2-3
Fig 2.2 Depth Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> project area for Stage 2 Phase 1<br />
2-4
Fig 2.3: Depth Pr<strong>of</strong>ile for Stage 2 Phase 2a<br />
2-5
Fig 2.4: Depth Pr<strong>of</strong>ile for Stage 2 Phase 2b<br />
2-6
2.1.2.3 Winds and Waves<br />
The coast <strong>of</strong> Belize is subjected to southeasterly trade winds that average 10-18 knots. The<br />
greatest trade winds are experienced in July (Stoddart, 1962). The coastal regions <strong>of</strong> the<br />
country including Ambergris Caye, get the majority <strong>of</strong> the winds. The southeasterly trade<br />
winds are the prevailing winds in the tropics, blowing from the high-pressure area in the<br />
Horse latitudes (Subtropical High) towards the low-pressure area around the equator.<br />
The prevailing winds [See Fig 2.5a] are the main driving force for waves and surface currents<br />
in coastal Belize and by extension the project area, especially eastern portion <strong>of</strong> Ambergris<br />
Caye. During the periods when the southeasterly and easterly winds prevail, maximum wave<br />
energy are developed in the deep seas, which are dissipated at the crest <strong>of</strong> the barrier reef, as<br />
well as over the barrier platform, with the breaking <strong>of</strong> these waves. During these times the<br />
waters surrounding the caye become richly oxygenated – which bodes well for the flora and<br />
fauna in the area.<br />
The coastal lagoon portion <strong>of</strong> the project site is not subjected to the strong wave action and<br />
therefore remains relatively calm throughout the year. This is primarily due to the water<br />
depth and associated bathymetry <strong>of</strong> the area as well as the prevailing winds as mentioned<br />
earlier. The wave action <strong>of</strong> the lagoon area however, is suffice to generate localized erosion<br />
over time as can be seen in several back dated maps <strong>of</strong> the area. This is especially important<br />
when the prevailing winds shifts to the northerlies and the shelf lagoon’s current intensifies.<br />
Further outwards, the wave action intensifies as the waters become more exposed to the<br />
winds and head towards mainland. This dynamic process is a continuous cycle that is<br />
dependent on the prevailing winds, its direction and the wave energy generated by the current<br />
influxes.<br />
The general wind pattern for the proposed project site is that <strong>of</strong> a east-southeasterly wind<br />
during the dry season, easterly winds in the rainy season and occasional northerly winds<br />
during the cooler months (October to February [See Fig. 2.5b]). In the period March-June the<br />
average wind speed is highest but the average wind-speed inland is considerable lower than<br />
along coastal areas.<br />
Fig. 2.5a: Wind Direction<br />
2-7
KNOTS<br />
%<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
84<br />
82<br />
80<br />
78<br />
76<br />
74<br />
32<br />
GUSTINESS<br />
PHILIP GOLDSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (1962 -1996)<br />
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY 35 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC<br />
Fig. 2.5 b: Annual Wind Speed and Gusts-PGIA<br />
Relative Humidity & Bright Sunshine<br />
Philip Goldson International Airport<br />
77<br />
9<br />
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec<br />
2-8<br />
32<br />
83<br />
Relative Humidity Bright Sunshine<br />
Fig. 2.5c: Relative Humidity and Sunshine.<br />
2.1.2.4 Tides<br />
10<br />
8<br />
Hours<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0
The world's oceans are in constant flux. Winds and currents move the surface water causing<br />
waves. Ocean levels fluctuate daily as the sun, moon and earth interact. As the moon travels<br />
around the earth and as they, together, travel around the sun, the combined gravitational<br />
forces cause the world's oceans to rise and fall. Tides vary from day to day. As the earth,<br />
moon, and sun orbit, their positions constantly shift, causing slightly different gravitational<br />
effects. This causes the tides to occur at slightly different times. Tides also vary from place to<br />
place. Geographical position determines the level <strong>of</strong> tide.<br />
Belize experiences semi-diurnal tides with amplitudes in the order <strong>of</strong> 0.5 M during normal<br />
weather and about 0.8 M in variation during the cold fronts. Another phenomenon affecting<br />
tidal amplitude in Belize and at the project site in general is the “Sun Tides” in October and<br />
March, in any given year. During these times the ‘migration’ <strong>of</strong> the Sun to and from the<br />
southern hemisphere has an additive effect on the tides, which are otherwise primarily<br />
dominated by the gravitational pull <strong>of</strong> the moon.<br />
During these times both the high tides and low tides are higher than ‘normal’. These<br />
variations may be on the order <strong>of</strong> 8 inches to 1 ft. The highest sun tides are experienced<br />
during the full moon and new Moon phases <strong>of</strong> the lunar cycle in which the high tide is<br />
referred to as “Higher High Water Spring Tide” or HHWS. During these times the low tide is<br />
referred to as “Higher Low Water Spring Tide” or HLWS. During the lower tidal cycle,<br />
which occurs during the 1 st Quarter and 3 rd or Last Quarter phase <strong>of</strong> the lunar cycle, the high<br />
tides are referred to as “Higher High Water Neap Tide” or HHWN: The low tides are<br />
referred “Higher Low Water Neap Tide” <strong>of</strong> HLWN.<br />
The ‘Sun Tides’ can have a severe inundating or ‘flooding’ and erosional effect on low lying<br />
areas. During the times <strong>of</strong> the sun tides and in markedly rough sea states, some <strong>of</strong> the coastal<br />
portion in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the project corridor can become waterlogged and inundated by the<br />
sea. This is especially important were the mangrove swamp land extends from the coastal<br />
areas into the project site. The reduced elevation and gently sloping pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the beach in the<br />
coastal area <strong>of</strong> the project site is a function <strong>of</strong> low tidal amplitude and the reduced energy<br />
efficiency.<br />
2.1.2.5 Current<br />
Ocean waters are constantly on the move. Currents flow in complex patterns affected by<br />
wind, the water’s salinity and heat content, bottom topography, and the earth’s rotation. The<br />
currents influencing the depositional and erosional processes are derived from both winddriven<br />
and tidal sources. The wind driven currents are greater in magnitude and are in general<br />
more influential in affecting the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the coastal ecosystems.<br />
The marine section <strong>of</strong> the project comprises <strong>of</strong> approximately 24 km, thus the current flow<br />
differs from area to area. As can be seen from Fig. 2.7 and Fig. 2.8, the current direction is<br />
constant in the open sea, which is influenced by the prevailing winds which exert a dominant<br />
influence on current directions, resulting in a South to South West movement, except for<br />
points #1 and #4. The current at point 1 is near the coastline, and due to the contour <strong>of</strong> the<br />
coast, the current goes out. In the case <strong>of</strong> point 4, this effect is influenced by the area known<br />
as Bulkhead Shoals that exist to the north <strong>of</strong> the project corridor, thus the under currents tend<br />
to follow the contour <strong>of</strong> the shoal, forcing the current to go in an opposite direction due to the<br />
2-9
<strong>of</strong>f-shoot.<br />
The prevailing winds also result in marine wave action moving predominantly towards the<br />
South Southwest. The pattern then changes the closer we get to San Pedro, this being<br />
influenced by the contour <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye. As can be seen from Fig 2.8, the current flows<br />
to the south southeast which is caused by the influence <strong>of</strong> the emptying tides. In the shallow<br />
San Pedro Lagoon, the currents are also influenced by tides due to the fact that the deepest<br />
area is no more than 2 to 3 feet. Currents in the Lagoon system flow primarily from the<br />
North-Northeast towards a South-South westerly direction.<br />
The prevailing water movement entering the Caribbean is the wind-driven Guiana Current,<br />
flowing from southeast to northwest; this becomes the Caribbean Current, flowing through<br />
the Lesser Antilles with the majority reaching the Yucatan Strait (Hanson & von Twistern,<br />
1996). The current breaks at Rocky Point, northern Belize, to form a small gyre that drives<br />
the sea <strong>of</strong>f Belize to flow from north to south (Perkins, 1983).<br />
While the prevailing current flow moves from north to south, powerful northerly winds<br />
during cold fronts or other storm events may generate temporary strong currents that may<br />
carry materials such as sediments as far as the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef System (MBRS).<br />
These currents do not only affect sediment transport but also the distribution <strong>of</strong> sessile<br />
organisms including grasses and algae. These currents vary seasonally and, though charted in<br />
general, have not been studied in detail (Hanson & von Twistern, 1996).<br />
Wind driven currents in the Belize City areas have been recorded at 1 - 1.5 knots at the<br />
immediate sub-surface depths and 0.2-0.6 knots at a depth <strong>of</strong> 1.8 meters (FAO/UNDP<br />
unpublished report, 1983). For the coastal portion <strong>of</strong> the project corridor, the currents <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Laguna de Boca Ciega and Caribbean Sea vary throughout the hydrographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile from<br />
0.36 ft/s to 1.08 ft/s. Float patterns collected as part <strong>of</strong> the overall field data for the Laguna de<br />
Boca Ciega indicate speeds <strong>of</strong> .72 ft/sec or .43 knots around the coastal portion <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
site (Information gotten from South Beach EIA).<br />
2-10
Fig: 2.6 Data for PGIA (Closest site data for project site)<br />
2-11<br />
(Courtesy Met Dept)<br />
Total Rainfall(mm) Avg. Min Temp Avg. Max Temp Relative Humidity(%)<br />
Sunshine<br />
hours<br />
Jan 127.2 69.1 82.6 82 6.9<br />
Feb 113.8 73.0 85.3 78 8.6<br />
Mar 99.9 72.5 84.7 80 8.2<br />
Apr 8.7 74.8 87.3 74 9.7<br />
May 115.1 78.1 89.6 76 9.0<br />
Jun 480.7 77.4 86.9 83 4.1<br />
Jul 119.2 77.5 88.0 80 7.1<br />
Aug 96.3 77.7 89.8 78 8.4<br />
Sep 258.2 77.0 89.6 81 6.4<br />
Oct 558.7 73.9 84.9 86 4.0<br />
Nov 7.5 68.2 84.0 75 8.0<br />
Dec 79.3 69.1 82.6 80 6.2<br />
Table <strong>2.0</strong> Monthly weather data for 2008 at Philip Goldson Airport (Courtesy MET Dept)
Fig 2.7: General Current Flow Pattern and Direction<br />
2-12
Fig: 2.8 Current flow for phase 2a <strong>of</strong> stage 2 <strong>of</strong> the project (Taken from South Beach EIA)<br />
2-13
2.1.2.6 Vulnerability to Tropical Cyclones<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> storm hazard analyses for Belize City can be used to characterize the site’s<br />
vulnerability to tropical cyclones. The average frequency for tropical storms or greater is 3.7<br />
years, for category 1 hurricanes or greater was 12 years. The development site lies in the path <strong>of</strong><br />
most tropical cyclones that threaten Belize. Due to this it is at risk every 20.75 years for a<br />
category 3 or greater storm every 40 years.<br />
During the last 78 years (1931 – 2009) the highest frequency <strong>of</strong> recorded landfalls was near<br />
Corozal and Punta Gorda Towns, while the lowest was near San Pedro and Orange Walk Towns.<br />
At least 3 tropical cyclones made landfall in the general vicinity <strong>of</strong> the development site during<br />
the same period. Cyclones crossing the general area vary in strength and winds were reported as<br />
high as 120 knots [See Fig 2.9].<br />
Tropical storms are the most frequent cyclones that impact the development site. TAOS Model<br />
Simulations 1 for an average strength tropical storm [48 knots sustained winds & NE Quad over<br />
site] impacting this site, indicate that maximum winds <strong>of</strong> 19 m/s and storm surge <strong>of</strong> 1.1 meters<br />
would impact the area. Therefore for the proposed project it will take place during the dry<br />
weather season, which also happens to be the period void <strong>of</strong> tropical storms and hurricanes.<br />
Locatrions <strong>of</strong> Hurricane Landfalls<br />
1<br />
Simulations conducted by The Forecast Office 1953-2004 <strong>of</strong> The National Meteorological Service<br />
Frequency<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
3<br />
5 5<br />
BELIZE CITY COROZAL PUNTA GORDA SANPEDRO STANN CREEK ORANGE WALK<br />
Fig. 2.9: Locations <strong>of</strong> Hurricane Landfalls.<br />
2-14<br />
1<br />
3<br />
1
Maximum winds associated with hurricanes range from 35 m/s for category 1 to 75 m/s for<br />
category 5. The entire corridor site is impacted for these winds. For a category 1 hurricane, the<br />
wind field extends 12 kilometers inland while for a category 5 hurricane it extends 10 kilometers<br />
inland.<br />
Belize lies within the hurricane belt and is <strong>of</strong>ten targeted by significant tropical weather. The<br />
hurricane season lasts from June to November, more or less coinciding with the rainy season.<br />
Hurricanes bring high winds, heavy rains and tidal waves in the case <strong>of</strong> the bigger ones. Because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the risks posed by hurricanes, it is recommended that important structures (at both landing<br />
sites, and the marker buoys) be designed to withstand high wind speeds.<br />
Designing for higher wind speeds depends on the project tolerance for risk or an analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cost <strong>of</strong> alternatives such as appropriate insurance coverage. It should be noted that the Caribbean<br />
Uniform Building Code (CUBiC) gives a 50-year return period hurricane wind speed <strong>of</strong> 121 mph<br />
for Belize based on 3-second gust; however it should also be noted that storm activity in the<br />
region has been higher in the past 10 years or so than in the preceding 50 years, and Belize has<br />
experienced 2 storms with wind speeds above 130mph in just the past 5 years.<br />
Sustained periods <strong>of</strong> heavy rains cause flooding during hurricanes and tropical storms. In the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> San Pedro, however, flooding as a result <strong>of</strong> rainfall is unlikely to be a major factor<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the interconnection <strong>of</strong> the internal bodies <strong>of</strong> water with the sea and lagoon, which<br />
means that water levels will always tend to that <strong>of</strong> mean sea level, but is prone to flooding in the<br />
Northern Belize district area. On the other hand, the project area would be highly vulnerable to<br />
inundation from storm surge in the event <strong>of</strong> hurricane for both San Pedro and Northern Belize<br />
District. Because <strong>of</strong> the fairly small geographic extent and the flat topography <strong>of</strong> the area, such<br />
inundation would likely affect the entire Ambergris Caye in a very short period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
2.1.2.7 Water Quality<br />
The physical water quality parameters are the functions which modify and influence the<br />
structural and biological elements <strong>of</strong> the barrier lagoon and by extension the proposed project<br />
corridor site. With this in mind several water samples were collected as part <strong>of</strong> the water quality<br />
assessment and monitoring plans ( See Chapter 6). The analysis were conducted primarily to<br />
determine the physical and chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the receiving marine environment and to<br />
formally establish a water quality data base.<br />
In this token, the EIA preparer took 2 sets <strong>of</strong> water samples (See Fig. 2.10). In the first 2 set, 7<br />
water samples were collected and taken to an accredited DoE laboratory for testing. In the last<br />
set <strong>of</strong> water samples 7 samples were collected and analyzed in-situ. The following summarizes<br />
the water quality <strong>of</strong> the project site.<br />
Transparency<br />
The waters coming from the ocean and flushing over the Barrier Platform are clear and largely<br />
free <strong>of</strong> turbid influences. The clarity <strong>of</strong> this deep ocean water is attributable to its nutrient-poor<br />
status and consequently low primary productivity. Cumulative results <strong>of</strong> the turbidity, suspended<br />
2-15
solids and total dissolved solids reading indicate that the Laguna de Boca Ciega along with the<br />
portions <strong>of</strong> the Hol Chan Marine Reserve that are close to the project corridor are satisfactory.<br />
Turbidity readings for the project site were very low indicating crystalline and transparent<br />
conditions<br />
The Suspended Solids and Total Dissolved Solids values for the different in-situ and analyzed<br />
sites showed a similar pattern and in fact are directly correlated to the turbidity readings. Both<br />
these parameters were very low and indicative <strong>of</strong> crystalline waters with very fine suspended<br />
solids and silt content. There was little variation between the sampling points for both parameters<br />
which could implicate that there was little deviation from the normal concentrations.<br />
Transparency is an important component in recreational waters and as such is the first visible<br />
indicator <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic pollution. The relative low ranges for these three parameters,<br />
especially for the leeward side <strong>of</strong> the project site, can be attributed to the calmer sea states (wave<br />
action and energy) and ocean currents within the entire project area.<br />
Nutrients<br />
The nutrient levels (nitrates/phosphates) for the different sampling sites were low and indicative<br />
<strong>of</strong> low- induced impacts and/or flow through circulation as is common in non-stratified water<br />
columns. The total phosphate value ranged from 0.02 mg/l to 0.05 mg/l which is low by DoE<br />
standards for any water body. Samples 1, 2 and 7 had the highest readings for this parameter at<br />
0.05 and 0.03 mg/l respectively (See Fig. 2.10). These values can probably be attributed to the<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the Bay <strong>of</strong> Chetumal, although other factors can be considered as well.<br />
Conversely, the nitrate concentrations for these two points were low as compared to the other<br />
sites. The nitrate concentration ranged from 6.60 mg/l to 8.36 mg/l which is normal for these<br />
types <strong>of</strong> water bodies.<br />
In regards to the oxygen concentrations, the results were very encouraging as the values were<br />
more than7.58 % which indicates a good saturation mixture. The oxygen concentrations ranges<br />
are important in maintaining a healthy marine environment.<br />
Salinity<br />
Salinity varies across the Belizean continental shelf in a north to south direction, as well as in an<br />
east to west direction. The variation in salinity along an east to west axis generally shows higher<br />
salinities as one proceeds eastwards or away from the mainland influences, which is a function <strong>of</strong><br />
the decreased riverine freshwater inputs. Thus oceanic conditions with relatively high salinities<br />
(3.0-3.8 %) prevail in the more distal waters <strong>of</strong> the shelf lagoon, as well as the barrier lagoon and<br />
reef system. This situation is accentuated during the drier months. Thus oceanic conditions are<br />
normally experienced in the deep sea and across barrier lagoon, the barrier Platform and the deep<br />
sea beyond the reef.<br />
The salinity range recorded by TNCE during the field visits were uniform and within range <strong>of</strong><br />
the aforementioned oceanic conditions. The range varied from 24 ppt at the back <strong>of</strong> the Laguna<br />
2-16
de Boca Ciega to 3.18 % at the windward side facing the Hol Chan Marine Reserve [See Fig.<br />
2.10]. This area registered the highest concentration averaging about 3.19%s whilst the lagoon<br />
portion registered a lower range.<br />
This pattern also holds true for the conductivity values which are similar across all the sets taken<br />
as well as for the total hardness concentration.<br />
Similarly, the temperature ranges within the sample sites remained constant averaging about 23 -<br />
24º C. However, the area closer to the mainland registered slightly lower reading for all<br />
parameters. The results however [See Fig 2.10] are still within the acceptable range and will not<br />
have any major impact on the project.<br />
2.1.2.8 Heavy Metals<br />
Reviewing the results provided by Pace Analytical Laboratory [See Annex V], there were only<br />
four heavy metals that were detected in the 7 samples sent for analysis. Four heavy metals were<br />
detected at the sample site 1 which was the closest to the mainland. Sample sites 2, 3, 4 & 5 had<br />
only two heavy metals detected, while sample sites 6 and 7 had three heavy metals detected. Of<br />
the four heavy metals detected, only two were present in all samples, namely Arsenic and<br />
Chromium.<br />
All samples had Arsenic present in quantities that are within acceptable limits. Uncontaminated<br />
marine sediment contains a level <strong>of</strong> 5 – 40 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> Arsenic. It must be noted that Arsenic<br />
originates from volcanic and hydrothermal sources, along with pollution from mining,<br />
agricultural run<strong>of</strong>f and several other anthropogenic sources. It is therefore noted that the range<br />
<strong>of</strong> Arsenic detected in our studies, from 1.57 to 5.29 mg/kg, is well within the acceptable limits<br />
for marine sediment [See Annex V].<br />
Chromium was also present in all samples. Based on Alternate Metal Standards (AMS) the<br />
highest acceptable limit for Chromium is 2<strong>2.0</strong> mg/kg. The detected amount <strong>of</strong> Chromium was in<br />
the range <strong>of</strong> 1.37 to 4.83mg/kg, which meets standards [See Annex V]. The highest reading was<br />
at sample site 1, and this could be attributed to the influence <strong>of</strong> land based run<strong>of</strong>f and also from<br />
the Bomba, New River and Rio Hondo Rivers that empty into the area, combined with the longshore<br />
sediment drift.<br />
Selenium was the third heavy metal detected in the samples; however this metal was only found<br />
in samples, 1, 6 & 7. These three samples are notably at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the corridor, and at the<br />
sampling site in the Boca Ciega Area and in the San Pedro Lagoon. The acceptable range limits<br />
for Selenium is 0 .046 to 10.65 mg/kg [See Annex V]. The results had a range <strong>of</strong> 3.52 to 7.86<br />
mg/kg, thus well within the allowable and safety limits. It is considered that the three areas with<br />
detectable limits <strong>of</strong> Selenium are due to the fact that Selenium can be cause by run<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>of</strong> sewer<br />
ponds and untreated liquid/sewage waste (anthropogenic sources). Considering that the last two<br />
sampling sites with the highest readings are located behind San Pedro Town [See Fig. 2.10b] and<br />
close to the sewer lagoons, the result can be attributed to the effluent <strong>of</strong> the sewer ponds.<br />
2-17
Finally, Zinc is the last detected heavy metal <strong>of</strong> all the samples, and it was only detected in the<br />
first sample at a level <strong>of</strong> 2.49 mg/kg [See Annex V]. According to AMS the allowable limit <strong>of</strong><br />
Zinc is 90.0 mg/kg. Thus as can be seen, the detected level is way below the allowable limit.<br />
Therefore, as can be determined from the results <strong>of</strong> the analysis, there is no potential danger from<br />
the re-suspension <strong>of</strong> heavy metals into the water column by the project activities proposed by btl.<br />
For a more detailed report, see Annex V.<br />
2-18
Fig. 2.10: Water Quality Results<br />
2-19
Fig. 2.10 (b): Heavy metals sampling sites and Results<br />
2-20
2.1.3 Geology<br />
The geological component will consist <strong>of</strong> a geological history <strong>of</strong> the area along with the relevant<br />
geomorphology and subsurface geology. The components also describe northern Belize to a<br />
larger extent. Much <strong>of</strong> the geological information obtained for this section was extracted from<br />
geological studies undertaken by Dr. S. J. Mazzullo on Ambergris Caye, which can be viewed at:<br />
http://ambergriscaye.com/pages/mayan/Sedimentology-mazzullo.html and also Holocene<br />
Sediments <strong>of</strong> the Belize Shelf by Dr. Clif Jordan,2002.<br />
The geology <strong>of</strong> Belize is divided into two (2) principal types <strong>of</strong> consolidated rocks. These two<br />
(2) rock types are the younger, Cretaceous age thick limestone and non-calcareous rocks, and the<br />
older unfaulted Paleozoic sediments and igneous intrusions <strong>of</strong> the Maya Mountains (Dixon,<br />
1955).<br />
The Yucatan Peninsula is comprised <strong>of</strong> a large geologic area known as the Maya or Yucatan bloc<br />
(Donelly and others, 1990). The entire Yucatan Peninsula, including Belize, is included in the<br />
Maya or Yucatan Bloc.<br />
In Northern Belize, the Cretaceous to Eocene limestone bedrock is the principal geologic unit<br />
dominating the region (Ower, 1956).<br />
During phases <strong>of</strong> the late Jurassic to Late Cretaceous periods, the Yucatan Peninsula underwent<br />
deposition <strong>of</strong> carbonate material consisting chiefly <strong>of</strong> limestone and dolomite. Limestone<br />
deposition occurred during the late Cretaceous period (Donelly and Ramos, 1990).<br />
Flores (1952) and Ower (1956) have described these limestones as ranging from Cretaceous to<br />
Eocene in age. Limestones in Northern Belize are inter-bedded with sediments such as<br />
siltstones, sands and clays (Ower, 1956).<br />
The rocks <strong>of</strong> Northern Belize are classified primarily into two (2) principal groups:<br />
(a) white marls and associated deposits, and,<br />
(b) Limestones.<br />
2.1.3.1 Geological History<br />
Ambergris Caye and the northern part <strong>of</strong> the Belize mainland, lies within the geologic area<br />
known as the Yucatan Platform. The geologic history <strong>of</strong> this area before the Cretaceous Period<br />
(some 140 million years ago) is only partially understood. Apparently the Yucatan Platform and<br />
presumably the Ambergris Caye area was land 195 million years ago and between 195 and 140<br />
million years ago (during the Jurassic Period) the area was slowly inundated by sea waters and<br />
sediments began to be deposited on the platform area (Mazzulu, 2000).<br />
By 140 million years ago the platform was nearly all under water with limestones being<br />
deposited all across it. The conditions responsible for relatively continuous deposition <strong>of</strong><br />
limestones have persisted until fairly recently, from a geologic point <strong>of</strong> view. This has resulted in<br />
the formation <strong>of</strong> a thick sequence <strong>of</strong> limestones that underlie Ambergris Caye and the northern<br />
2-21
Belize. In recent geologic time the area <strong>of</strong> and around Ambergris Caye has alternated between<br />
being a shallow sea floor and being exposed as dry land.<br />
In other words the glaciers alternately advanced and retreated across the continents during the<br />
Pleistocene Period, from 1.6 million to 10,000 years ago. As they advanced and ice built up,<br />
global sea level dropped and exposed the limestones on the caye to rainwater, which resulted in<br />
the formation <strong>of</strong> the many caves and sinkholes (cenotes) on the caye and throughout Belize.<br />
These features are known as "karst". As the glaciers retreated global sea level rose and new<br />
limestones were formed.<br />
On Ambergris Caye, the oldest rocks exposed at the surface are Late Pleistocene and Holocene<br />
in age (See Fig. 2.1). The youngest limestones on the caye, such as at Reef (Rocky) Point, are<br />
125,000 years old and they were exposed on land until about 6,100 years ago when sea level<br />
began to rise again to its present stand. These rocks also have karst features.<br />
2.1.3.2 Geomorphology and Sub-surface Geology<br />
In geological time the project corridor area and Ambergris Caye were created by the deposition<br />
<strong>of</strong> sediments, consisting <strong>of</strong> calcareous materials (sand and mud), which were overlain above a<br />
limestone ridge [See Figs. 2.11 & 2.11(b)]. The formation <strong>of</strong> this ridge started about 2 million<br />
years ago during the Pleistocene era and continues into the present period. The various sediments<br />
overlaying this limestone are found in different areas <strong>of</strong> the peninsula but a general pattern is<br />
clear. Along the beach berm the sediments are predominantly sand derived from fragments <strong>of</strong><br />
coral formations and allies.<br />
The sands in the lagoon system behind the reef and within the reef system itself are also derived<br />
from this source. In the region east <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye in the area referred to as Chetumal Bay<br />
there are also deposition <strong>of</strong> sandy structures but the source is different. These sands are derived<br />
primarily from 1 cell protozoan animals <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as “Sordid Foramifera”[See Fig<br />
2.11(b)]. As a general rule these sands are much finer than the sands derived from the coral<br />
formations and are not as much sought after for recreational purposes such as tourism resorts.<br />
The Bulkhead Shoals [See Fig. 2.11(d)] are practically in the midway point <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
corridor, and this area has effects on the currents and material makeup <strong>of</strong> the area. Due to the<br />
muddy areas [See Fig. 2.11(b), there are approximately 8 to 12 inches <strong>of</strong> mud/silt on top <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sand on the seabed.<br />
Further North West near the mainland and in the Cangrejo Shoals area [See Fig 2.11(c)], these<br />
minute sediments get even smaller, being derived primarily from the breakdown <strong>of</strong> microscopic<br />
“Miliolid Foraminifera”. As a consequence <strong>of</strong> small particle size these sediments are<br />
characteristically muddy in texture.<br />
In certain areas there are exposed limestone outcroppings at various location interspersed with<br />
areas that are covered by sediments. In these areas the limestone is close to the surface and it is<br />
between these exposed ridges that sediments settle with depths ranging from 0 – 2 m. Along with<br />
2-22
the beach ridge these exposed limestone areas support the major terrestrial plant and animal<br />
communities <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye.<br />
Areas not part <strong>of</strong> the beach ridge or the exposed limestone areas fall into the wetlands region,<br />
which comprise a large area <strong>of</strong> the Ambergris Caye peninsula. Although not used for residential<br />
or tourism development these wetland areas are vital to the well being <strong>of</strong> the marine ecosystem,<br />
providing a variety <strong>of</strong> services, including filtration <strong>of</strong> sediments, nurseries for juvenile marine<br />
life forms and protection from storm damage.<br />
A typical cross section <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye and associated areas is shown in Fig.2.11. The figure<br />
shows the main geological formation from Chetumal Bay to the barrier reef including the main<br />
sediment formations between Ambergris Caye and the mainland and Ambergris Caye and the<br />
Belize Barrier Reef.<br />
Fig. 2.11: Typical cross section <strong>of</strong> the geological formations underlying Ambergris Caye and<br />
associated areas.<br />
2-23
Fig 2.11(b) Classification <strong>of</strong> Sea-bead for the country <strong>of</strong> Belize<br />
2-24
Fig. 2.11(c): Map showing the Cangrejo Shoals area<br />
Fig. 2.11(d) Map showing location <strong>of</strong> Bulkhead Shoals<br />
2-25
Fig. 2.12 Geological Map <strong>of</strong> Belize<br />
2-26
Fig 2.13: Geological Chart for Belize<br />
2-27
2.1.3.3 Seismology<br />
According to the seismicity <strong>of</strong> Central America and the seismic intensity map <strong>of</strong> Belize, much <strong>of</strong><br />
this activity is located to the west in the mountainous provinces <strong>of</strong> Chiapas, Mexico and the south<br />
in neighboring Guatemala and Honduras [See Plate 2.1 and Fig. 2.14]. For Belize, earthquake<br />
hazard increases steadily from the north to the south and in addition, as can be seen in Fig. 2.14,<br />
the project falls in the < 5.0 magnitude scale (Richter scale). Earthquakes that affect the country <strong>of</strong><br />
Belize occur in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Honduras which is the plate boundary zone between North America<br />
and the Caribbean. Belize, on occasion would experience mild tremors as the one experienced on<br />
November 26, which occurred in Chiapas, Mexico and was registered at 5.8.<br />
Ambergris Caye is located parallel along a major fault line or zone as can be seen in the Geological<br />
Fault Location map, (See Figs. 2.15, 2.15(b) & 2.15 (c)). This cannot be said for the entire length<br />
the modern barrier reef as it sits atop a prominent fault that separates the shallow platform to the<br />
west from the deeper Caribbean to the east, where water depths progressively approach 13,123 feet<br />
(4,000 meters). Turneffe, Lighthouse and Glovers Atolls all sit atop major fault blocks ("horsts")<br />
that formed as a result <strong>of</strong> the eastward sliding <strong>of</strong> the Caribbean plate past Belize and the North<br />
American plate. The major NE-trending faults shown in the accompanying map are "normal faults"<br />
that include portions that have dropped down on their eastern sides. The nearly EW-trending fault<br />
on the south is the boundary <strong>of</strong> the North American and Caribbean plates.<br />
With this in mind and based on the different geological maps, the proposed project is prone to<br />
some seismic activity. It is necessary therefore that the cable is buried at an appropriate depth, and<br />
that the casing <strong>of</strong> the cable be designed to withstand any such activities.<br />
2 - 28
Fig. 2.14 Seismic Intensity Map <strong>of</strong> Belize and project site<br />
2 - 29
Fig. 2.15 Geological Fault Map <strong>of</strong> Belize<br />
2 - 30
Fig 2.15 (b) Map showing the Motagua Swan Island Fault<br />
Fig 2.15(c): Map showing the regional faults, plates and movements<br />
2 - 31
2.1.4 Soils<br />
The soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the proposed project was determined based on the geological history <strong>of</strong> the<br />
area as well as data obtained in the field by the consultancy team. The soils component, which is<br />
a part <strong>of</strong> the geological description, will consist <strong>of</strong> a soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile describing the effects it will have<br />
on the project activities.<br />
2.1.4.1 Soil Characterization<br />
In the land classification scheme Ambergris Caye falls within the Northern Coastal Plains land<br />
region (King et. al., 1992). The landform in this region is characteristically flat to undulating. At<br />
Ambergris Caye four principal land subtypes are identifiable, but <strong>of</strong>ten in combination with each<br />
other. These are:<br />
a) Corozal Saline (ZY) – Soils <strong>of</strong> the Corozal Saline region contain Shipstern and Ycacos<br />
soils, which support different vegetation types depending on their associations or<br />
isolation from each other. In some areas scrub savannah vegetation will be found whereas<br />
in other areas tree savannahs are found. In purely Ycacos soils mangrove formations and<br />
herbaceous swamps will thrive. Ycacos soils are highly saline hence favoring salt tolerant<br />
species. The parent material <strong>of</strong> these soils, are hill wash and wet alluvial.<br />
b) North Ambergris Plain (AL) – Contain Shipstern Soils, which on the North Ambergris<br />
Plain are shallow calcareous sands over ancient coral. The Shipstern parent material is<br />
beach sand. These soils are characterized by limited moisture content, having limited<br />
water available to plants during the extended dry season, which is typical <strong>of</strong> this region.<br />
These soils support primarily beach type broadleaf forest.<br />
c) West Ambergris Plain (AN) – Like the Corozal Saline, soils <strong>of</strong> the West Ambergris Plain<br />
also contains Shipstern and Ycacos soils. Not surprisingly, these soils are <strong>of</strong>ten found at<br />
the intergrade between the Corozal Saline and the North Ambergris Plain System.<br />
d) Ambergris Strand Plain (AB) – Contain the so called “Ambergris Soils”, which dominate<br />
the windward side <strong>of</strong> the peninsula and are formed from the accumulation <strong>of</strong> sandy<br />
sediments which were deposited by the southerly flowing long shore currents that flow<br />
parallel to Ambergris Caye.<br />
2.1.4.2 Bedrock/Resistance Probing<br />
A series <strong>of</strong> rod perforations were done to bedrock on the project site, especially Stage 2 Phases 2<br />
a & b to determine the different soil layers and to determine their depth, structure and suitability<br />
for the proposed project. These perforations were done along the proposed project corridor and<br />
although there were some variations in depth, a general picture <strong>of</strong> the prevailing bedrock pattern<br />
emerged [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. These probing were done to in order to determine the ease <strong>of</strong><br />
access to the required 3 feet for cable burial into the sea bed, and the type <strong>of</strong> material that will be<br />
encountered.<br />
2 - 32
The pr<strong>of</strong>ile shows that along Stage 2 Phase 1, there won’t be any need to penetrate into bedrock,<br />
as there is sufficient sand material along the proposed project corridor. The material in the<br />
section tends to range from clay with sand to sandy silt with small gravel and shells as the<br />
corridor moves East towards San Pedro. The lagoon water column depth behind San Pedro<br />
varied from 0’ – 4 feet with the upper horizontal layer <strong>of</strong> the lagoon bed consisted <strong>of</strong> decaying<br />
inorganic matter mostly from plant debris (peat) with some fine sediment, clays, and sand. This<br />
layer was readily distinguishable on the basis <strong>of</strong> appearance, having a dark black color. The<br />
upper horizon layer varied in depth from one locale on the property to the next but mostly fell<br />
between 0 – 3.5 feet.<br />
Such peat formations are called Cyclothems. A cyclothem is a unit <strong>of</strong> peat and clastic sediments.<br />
The clastic sediment is the accumulated remains <strong>of</strong> broken rocks and skeletal remains <strong>of</strong> dead<br />
organism (detritus). Beneath the peat layer is the limestone bedrock, which as was previously<br />
mentioned can protrude to the surface along the coastal ridge.<br />
2.1.4.3 Soil Sample Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
During the study, soil samples were collected at 4 locations and analyzed (See Fig.2.16). The<br />
results show the samples collected at the different sites are composed predominantly <strong>of</strong> clay with<br />
sand to sandy silt with small gravel and shells as it travels towards the East. In other words, fine<br />
to coarse sand that is mixed with calcareous (carbonatious) materials. The results also show that<br />
the composition <strong>of</strong> sand in the total makeup decreases as one move away from the coastline. The<br />
proposed project will therefore look for this type <strong>of</strong> sand in order to carry out the project<br />
activities.<br />
2.1.4.4 Recommendation <strong>of</strong> Soil Study<br />
The main trust <strong>of</strong> the geotechnical study was the performance <strong>of</strong> determining the bedrock<br />
elevation by coring at selected locations in an attempt to determine the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Due to the<br />
fact that the soils were highly silty, this sampling was difficult. However, it soon became clear<br />
that the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile is very consistent along the proposed site, and especially down to a shallow<br />
depth that is typical <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye when drawing near to San Pedro.<br />
2 - 33
Left: Sample A showing mostly clay with sand and some prop roots. Minimal peat material<br />
being excavated nearby. Right: Sand mixed for the first 2 ft with Sandy silt being the remaining<br />
18 inches [See Fig. 2.16]<br />
Plate 2.2 Examples <strong>of</strong> Soil Conditions along Project Corridor for Stage 2 Phase 1<br />
Left: Sample C showing mostly silty sand and sandy silt with some sparse shells. Right: Silty<br />
Sand mixed with sandy silt and Small gravel with shells [See Fig. 2.16]<br />
Plate 2.3 Examples <strong>of</strong> Soil Conditions along Project Corridor for Stage 2 Phase 1<br />
2 - 34
Fig. 2.16 Sediment Sample Location<br />
2 - 35
The probing <strong>of</strong> the project corridor reveals low bearing capacity soils to a shallow depth over<br />
Stage 2 Phase 2 a & b. Refusal was encountered in all locations at relatively shallow depths<br />
which indicate a large shallow bedrock zone [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. As can be seen from the<br />
soil testing results described, the soils in the upper levels on the project area have low bearing<br />
capacity. Because <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> soils encountered (organic silt and some sand) it is not advisable<br />
to place floating or strip foundations for significant structures to bear on these soils. Not only are<br />
the bearing capacities very low, but also the properties <strong>of</strong> organic soils are unreliable and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
change over time as matter decays.<br />
Recommendations<br />
Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the bedrock probing and the soil sampling, it is recommended that the<br />
water jet plough be used for Stage 2 Phase 1 <strong>of</strong> the project, while a backhoe or similar equipment<br />
be utilized to complete Stage 2 Phase 2 a & b due to the high emergence <strong>of</strong> bedrock.<br />
2.1.5 Displacement <strong>of</strong> Materials<br />
The project activities for the proposed project will be carried out in by a series <strong>of</strong> forecasted<br />
project activities. With this in mind, the aforementioned component will involve two (2) phases<br />
that will be broken down to smaller sub-phases as the development progresses. Therefore, the<br />
activities process will involve the burial <strong>of</strong> Stage 2 Phase 1, which is 19.15 km <strong>of</strong> mostly sand,<br />
clay and silt, and then Stage 2 Phase 2 the last 4.11 km the proposed project which is comprised<br />
<strong>of</strong> some sand and bedrock [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. Considering these forecasted activities, the<br />
project has no plans to utilize the excavated materials (spoils) for any purpose. The material is<br />
expected to fall back naturally.<br />
In the general view <strong>of</strong> the forecasted activities and considering the project site, the development<br />
plans to utilize the spoils to backfill over the SFOC, especially along the bedrock areas [See Fig.<br />
1.6].<br />
2.1.5.1 Types <strong>of</strong> Cable Burial Equipment<br />
There are many factors in choosing the correct and appropriate equipment for the proposed<br />
project activities. One <strong>of</strong> these factors is the type <strong>of</strong> material, depth <strong>of</strong> water, the location <strong>of</strong> the<br />
activity and finally, the deposition <strong>of</strong> the dredging spoils or materials. There are a variety <strong>of</strong> tools<br />
or dredgers capable <strong>of</strong> being used for such a project. So all these issues may play an important<br />
role in economic analysis, but ultimately, if the work is to be accomplished by contract, the<br />
competitive bidding process will <strong>of</strong>ten serve as the final decision mechanism (Herbich, 2000).<br />
With this in mind it is anticipated that the proposed btl FOC project will utilize a Jetting Plough<br />
for the major portion <strong>of</strong> the anticipated. This type <strong>of</strong> equipment uses a jetting system that forces<br />
out water at the base <strong>of</strong> the plough, thus liquefying the sediment, the plough then easily digs the<br />
substrate to the desired depth. Immediately behind, the FOC is laid, and due to the liquefied<br />
material still in suspension, the cable sinks easily into the material that was disturbed, which<br />
resettles covering the cable. This equipment is towed behind a barge or supply vessel [See Plate<br />
2 - 36
2.4 & 2.5].<br />
The other mechanism will include the use <strong>of</strong> some sort <strong>of</strong> excavator and grab type machines [See<br />
Plate 2.5] for the Stage 2 Phase 2 a & b section <strong>of</strong> the project, due to the fact that bedrock is<br />
inches <strong>of</strong> the sea floor. Little can be done to mitigate direct effects <strong>of</strong> activities in this type <strong>of</strong><br />
environment, but due to the fact that it is mostly bedrock, the sedimentation problem will be<br />
greatly reduced. This compiled with the operation only occurring during incoming tides, the<br />
possibility detrimental sedimentation occurring to sensitive areas south <strong>of</strong> the project will be<br />
minimal. Choosing a method and environmental circumstance that minimizes damage is the<br />
ultimate purpose <strong>of</strong> the project. It is therefore important to note, that since the burial <strong>of</strong> the cable<br />
will be contracted, the equipment utilized will probably change, but if that is the case, a complete<br />
report on the methodology used will be submitted to DOE as it becomes available.<br />
2 - 37
Platform Supply Vessels<br />
Plate 2.4: Types <strong>of</strong> Supply vessels used in cable laying operations<br />
2 - 38
Left: Example <strong>of</strong> a back hoe outfitted with a crusher on the bucked. This assists in breaking up<br />
the bedrock so that it can be used as back fill. Note the rotating crusher on the stern <strong>of</strong> the<br />
bucket. Right: Sketch <strong>of</strong> plough jetter used in s<strong>of</strong>t areas [See Annex III].<br />
Plate 2.5 Examples <strong>of</strong> Equipment to be utilized<br />
2.1.5.2 Volumes <strong>of</strong> Displaced Materials<br />
Based on the calculations [See Table 2.2] <strong>of</strong> the forecasted events (Stage 2 Phases 1 & 2), the<br />
proposed project will disturb an estimated 7,781.50 cubic meters <strong>of</strong> material that will not be<br />
extracted, but instead will be used to cover the SFOC. Based on this methodology, the volume<br />
<strong>of</strong> material displaced will be adequate to cover the SFOC providing additional protection.<br />
Of this amount, it is estimated that Stage 2 Phase 1 will displace about 7,011.21 m 3 <strong>of</strong> material<br />
and Stage 2 Phases 2 a & b will displace 770.29m³ <strong>of</strong> material. The entire area to be disturbed,<br />
with dimensions <strong>of</strong> approximately 3 ft deep by 1.5 ft wide will measure about 2.11 acres. The<br />
seabed pr<strong>of</strong>ile for this site consists <strong>of</strong> an uneven floor with several undulating mounds where<br />
material can be obtained for fill [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. Other seafloor pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the site<br />
indicate that there is ample sand depth in the first Phase, however, for Phase 2, due to the<br />
emergence <strong>of</strong> bedrock; another methodology will be utilized.<br />
These volumes are modest given the scale and magnitude <strong>of</strong> the proposed project. It is<br />
anticipated, as explained previously, that much <strong>of</strong> the material will consist <strong>of</strong> sand, clay, gravel,<br />
shells and peat. The activities conducted in these areas will not impose major environmental<br />
impacts that can and will be mitigated by means <strong>of</strong> engineering controls and monitoring (See<br />
Chapters 5 and 6).<br />
2-39
Table 2.1 Anticipated disturbed volumes <strong>of</strong> material caused by the proposed project<br />
LOCATION SUBSTRATE<br />
TYPE<br />
LENGTH<br />
(km)<br />
2-40<br />
WIDTH<br />
(m)<br />
AREA<br />
(acres)<br />
A to B Sea bed 19.15 0.38 1.80<br />
B to Channel Bedrock 1.28 0.30 0.10<br />
Channel to Sediment & 2.83 0.30 0.21<br />
Landing Bedrock<br />
TOTAL<br />
(break down)<br />
2.11<br />
Length (m) Width (m) Depth (m) Material (m³) Total<br />
Rock<br />
1280 0.31 0.91 361.09<br />
2200 0.31 0.6 409.20<br />
770.29 770.29<br />
Sand<br />
2200 0.31 0.31 211.42<br />
630 0.31 0.91 177.72<br />
19150 0.38 0.91 662<strong>2.0</strong>7<br />
7011.21 7011.21<br />
Landings<br />
142 0.31 0.91 40.06<br />
9.14 0.31 0.91 2.58<br />
42.64 42.64<br />
GRAND TOTAL 7824.14<br />
2.1.5.3 Project Activities<br />
This activity will involve the use <strong>of</strong> engineering controls to safely operate in the area where it<br />
will be utilized. As described earlier, the operation will take place during daylight hours, which<br />
during the months <strong>of</strong> February to August have the highest amount <strong>of</strong> sunshine percentage [See<br />
Fig. 2.5c] and only during incoming tide once behind San Pedro.<br />
As mentioned previously, the project corridor runs for approximately 24 km from the mainland<br />
coast <strong>of</strong> Belize to San Pedro, Ambergris Caye [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. In considering the<br />
project corridor, the proposed project will need to utilize two types <strong>of</strong> equipments, one a plough
jetter and the other a back hoe with stone crushing capabilities [See Plate 2.5]. Noting that the<br />
spoil will be used to fill back over the SFOC, there will be no need for the transportation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
spoil material to any other destination. The material will resettle naturally, especially in Phase 2,<br />
which will then be used to cover the SFOC for further protection. This will aid in reducing<br />
navigational hazards, especially at night.<br />
2.1.5.4 Sedimentation Control<br />
In view <strong>of</strong> this, there is also no need for a containment mechanism. Taking into consideration<br />
the nature <strong>of</strong> the project and the methods to be utilized, the material will naturally settle over the<br />
SFOC and consolidate itself, providing protection to the SFOC. In other words, once the SFOC<br />
is laid, which is immediately after the plough passes; the material will settle and naturally<br />
compact itself. This is a very cost effective method for backfilling over the SFOC.<br />
This method has also been used on the BEL Power II Project that runs from coastal Belize to San<br />
Pedro, basically the same route as the btl SFOC. Subsequent to this activity, a visual survey is<br />
made <strong>of</strong> the entire cable route to ensure that the cable is indeed buried. If not, then sand is either<br />
obtained from another source or it is left for time to backfill by virtue <strong>of</strong> the currents and<br />
sediment transport from the rivers that empty into the area.<br />
Sedimentation or siltation for that matter will be generated during the project activities. In<br />
addition, these factors can be generated during the project development and more importantly<br />
during project operation. In view <strong>of</strong> the potential impacts this process can have on the<br />
environment the following practices will be taken into account along with the appropriate<br />
mitigation measures (See Chapter 6).<br />
The project activities will be done in phases. There will be a sufficient time between each<br />
phase for any suspended material to settle.<br />
All activities will be done in calm sea states thereby minimizing the potential for<br />
sediment dispersal.<br />
The activities behind San Pedro will only be done during the incoming tide. This will aid<br />
in avoiding the sedimentation plume to affect Hol Chan.<br />
2.1.5.5 Fire Control<br />
The section <strong>of</strong> the Overhead Fiber Optic Cable (OFOC) will be the only section <strong>of</strong> the cable that<br />
is vulnerable to fire. As can be seen from Fig. 2.17, the fire risk for the area is large, with a<br />
small section being extreme risk and the other sections low risk. It is therefore <strong>of</strong> utmost<br />
importance that the corridor be maintained and cleared, especially during the dry season, when<br />
fires are more abundant, which is from April to June, however, there is also a “maga season”<br />
during July to August that sometimes is also as dry. Due to the fact that btl will be using the<br />
transmission poles belonging to BEL, it is BEL’s job to maintain the corridors clean and clear <strong>of</strong><br />
any debris that might be considered fuel for fires.<br />
2-41
Fig 2.17: Fire risk chart<br />
2.1.6 Ecosystem Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />
This pr<strong>of</strong>ile is described in detail in Section 2.2 along with a description <strong>of</strong> the flora and fauna <strong>of</strong><br />
the entire project corridor. The ecosystem <strong>of</strong> importance to the project site is the Hol Chan<br />
Marine Reserve which is south <strong>of</strong> the project corridor. This marine reserve was declared a<br />
reserve by S.I. 57 <strong>of</strong> 1987 on the 25 th July 1987, and amended by S.I. 100 <strong>of</strong> 1999. The reserve<br />
is comprised <strong>of</strong> four zones, the Preservation Zone, the Conservation Zone, the General Use<br />
Zone, and Shark Ray Alley. It was again amended to include the Cangrejo Cayes by S.I. 116 <strong>of</strong><br />
2008.<br />
Hol Chan has so far been the most widely visited reserve in the country (BTB 2007), and has<br />
been used as a model not only for the other reserves in the country, but also in the region. The<br />
reserve is well funded, and has its own trust fund that has been utilized to maintain and upgrade<br />
not only the park itself, by installing moorings within the area, but also to upgrade the reserve<br />
<strong>of</strong>fices which are located in San Pedro Town. Thus the Reserve is not fully dependent on the<br />
budget <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> Belize.<br />
2-42
Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the Reserve, the Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> is the Governmental agency<br />
responsible for all Marine Reserves, but due to the fact that the Reserve has a trust fund, there is<br />
a Board <strong>of</strong> Directors that manages the finances <strong>of</strong> the reserve, while the staff, under the<br />
directives <strong>of</strong> the Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> is responsible for the day to day activities <strong>of</strong> the Reserve<br />
and its operations at sea. The reserve has so far been one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons why the San Pedro<br />
Community divested their interest from Fishing to Tourism, and has prospered. It is with this in<br />
mind that the residents <strong>of</strong> the island are so protected <strong>of</strong> the Hol Chan Marine Reserve.<br />
2.1.7 Land Use<br />
It is anticipated that the land use for the project corridor and related surrounding areas will<br />
involve the use <strong>of</strong> traditional utilization coupled with the growing tourism sector as summarized<br />
in the following sections.<br />
2.1.7.1 Land Use <strong>of</strong> Project Site<br />
The project area is relatively an undeveloped zone except for the BEL transmission lines and<br />
submarine cable. Most <strong>of</strong> the developments around the area is tourism related. With this in mind,<br />
the proposed project will venture to further enhance tourism related business by <strong>of</strong>fering fast and<br />
reliable service along with a host <strong>of</strong> related amenities and services that will sustain the project.<br />
Therefore the site currently has no agricultural value and considering the fact that the OFOC<br />
section is being accommodated by BEL transmission poles, the project won’t interfere with any<br />
activity planned for the area.<br />
Tourism is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing industries in Belize next to oil and generating substantial<br />
income for the country while requiring much more servicing that any other industry. As the<br />
main attraction <strong>of</strong> the Belizean tourism industry, this area continues to attract capital and new<br />
investments, which in turn provide opportunities for new settlers, migrant laborers and service<br />
providers who come to share in the windfall. Considering the potential land use <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
site, the proponent will not affect the planned use <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the area that it is utilizing, due to the<br />
fact that stage one is overhead on existing poles, and stage 2 is underwater, in an area that for the<br />
most part has a low biodiversity value [See Fig. 2.11(b) & 2.19] and stage 3 is joining up to an<br />
already existing underground network that exists in San Pedro. Furthermore, the developer will<br />
construct and install the necessary support services and amenities that are required for such<br />
project. This will eventual give rise to an increase in the economic flow to San Pedro Town and<br />
to a greater extent, the entire Ambergris Caye.<br />
The project site is a component <strong>of</strong> already cleared corridor for the OFOC and marine (seabed)<br />
area for the burial <strong>of</strong> the SFOC. The project site runs basically NE from the coast near Bomba to<br />
San Pedro Town. The area will traverse areas that are already in use by a similar project, the<br />
BEL Power II Project Submarine Cable, and then traverses a small section utilized by<br />
commercial barges that either transport sugar from the Sugar Factories in the North to Belize<br />
City or carry cargo to and from San Pedro Town. Additionally, there is traffic by tour operators<br />
and guides in the area, which they utilize to reach other destinations such as Bomba, Maskall,<br />
Corozal, or when the weather is rough, they utilize the leeward side <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye to go<br />
north to Bacalar Chico.<br />
2-43
Basically as mentioned earlier, the section that comprises Stage 1 is being done on an area that is<br />
already in use by the BEL Power II Project, and the FOC will be going overhead from Maskall to<br />
Bomba and then to the coastline on the existing transmission poles that are in use by BEL.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> the FOC landing in San Pedro Town, btl presently has an underground network<br />
that will be utilized to avoid having the FOC overhead. This will also assist in case <strong>of</strong> storms<br />
and hurricanes, alleviating the problems <strong>of</strong> down lines due to heavy winds.<br />
2.1.7.2 Land/Seabed Tenure<br />
On the OFOC section, the land tenure issue is <strong>of</strong> no consequence since it is already being utilized<br />
by BEL project transmission poles which the SFOC will be utilizing.<br />
Since the area to be utilized has already been used by a similar project, and the major Stage <strong>of</strong><br />
the project is the burial <strong>of</strong> the SFOC in the sea-bed, combined with the fact that the landing site<br />
in San Pedro is on a road access near an already existing manhole, the issue <strong>of</strong> Land use is <strong>of</strong> no<br />
major significance.<br />
Additionally, the marine area to be traversed by the project site is used by two main types <strong>of</strong><br />
vessel movements. The primary, which has been the use for many decades is as the barge route<br />
See Fig. 2.18(b) used by Belize Sugar Industries Ltd. to transport sugar and molasses to Belize<br />
City and the awaiting ships in the harbor.<br />
The second use, which has increased within the last decade, is as a route for the barges that<br />
transport materials from Belize City to San Pedro Town, whether it is construction or food. This<br />
is one <strong>of</strong> the important routes, since it is the supply route for the town, and if this route is blocked<br />
or shut <strong>of</strong>f, San Pedro could be in dire straits [See Fig. 2.18(b)].<br />
2-44
Fig. 2.18 Protected Areas Map <strong>of</strong> Northern Belize<br />
2-45
2.1.7.3 Land Use <strong>of</strong> Surrounding Areas<br />
The area adjacent to the project corridor consists <strong>of</strong> areas that are primarily used as fishing<br />
camps that are either leased or privately owned. Some <strong>of</strong> these areas are a part <strong>of</strong> the Hol Chan<br />
Marine Reserve and are subject to protection according to the different zoning schemes <strong>of</strong> the<br />
reserve. A few fisher-folk and their staff utilize the back area <strong>of</strong> the lagoon for several fishing<br />
activities, both recreational and commercial. As can be seen from Fig. 2.18, no section <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Hol Chan Marine Reserve will be disturbed by the project activities.<br />
2.1.7.4 Zone <strong>of</strong> Influence<br />
The proposed project coupled with the increase growth in the tourism sector will undoubtedly<br />
affect both the social and receiving environment. It is anticipated that the zone <strong>of</strong> influence will<br />
not be limited to the development zones within the project site but will extend the entire breadth<br />
and length <strong>of</strong> the greater Ambergris Caye. This also includes the navigable areas <strong>of</strong> the project<br />
site and the neighboring Hol Chan Marine Reserve [See Fig. 2.18].<br />
In the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> the project site all the settlements occupy a narrow band along the<br />
east coast. Indeed the prospects for settlements further inland (west) at this location are severely<br />
restrained by the presence <strong>of</strong> the Boca Ciega Lagoon and its surrounding marsh and mangrove.<br />
This lowland aquatic system essentially restricts development to a narrow strip along the east<br />
coast. There are no other land use in the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> this proposed project besides<br />
residential and tourism enterprises. It is anticipated that the proposed project will not influence<br />
other users <strong>of</strong> the area in terms <strong>of</strong> water and energy demand as well as wastewater and solid<br />
waste generation. In considering the project, the development will strictly be influencing the<br />
tourism sector and the Belizean population. It is anticipated that as the development unfolds, the<br />
information technology and traffic activity between San Pedro Town, Belize City and the worldwide-web<br />
will increase, thus increasing the exposure <strong>of</strong> not only San Pedro, but Belize on a<br />
whole under the guise <strong>of</strong> tourism potential and preferred destination.<br />
2-46
Fig: 2.18(b): Map Showing Traffic routes<br />
2-47
2.2 Flora and Fauna<br />
2.2.1 Vegetation<br />
Stage 1 <strong>of</strong> the project site is characterized by sub-tidal or permanently submerged aquatic<br />
vegetation and emergent inter-tidal herbaceous and woody flora, as well as terrestrial forest<br />
stands [See Fig.2.19]. The ‘rooted’ or attached sub-tidal vegetation <strong>of</strong> the site are a combination<br />
<strong>of</strong> sea grasses and macro-algae.<br />
Both the nearshore and <strong>of</strong>fshore marine areas have patches <strong>of</strong> sparse sea grass beds. These sea<br />
grass beds are comprised almost exclusively <strong>of</strong> the Turtle Grass - Thalassia testudinum. In some<br />
areas the Turtle Grass foliage is punctuated intermittently by shoots <strong>of</strong> macro-algae such as the<br />
Shaving Bush Algae (Penicillus pyriformis), the feather-shaped algae ( Caulerpa cupressoides)<br />
and the Green Chain Algae ( Halimeda copiosa) [See Table 2.3]. In the nearshore areas and<br />
shallow consolidated sand banks <strong>of</strong> the primary coast, the presence <strong>of</strong> the Manatee Grass<br />
(Syringodium filiforme) is noticeable.<br />
The inter-tidal emergent vegetation and terrestrial flora near the project corridor at the beginning<br />
<strong>of</strong> the SFOC is dependent on the forest type or vegetation assemblage. Much <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
immediately landward <strong>of</strong> the mangrove ‘zone’ <strong>of</strong> the primary sea coast was characterized by a<br />
littoral forest [See Fig. 2.19]. This area was a relatively high berm and beach ridge [See Plate<br />
2.6]. This area contained species such as: the black poisonwood (Met opium brownei), the wild<br />
grape (Cocoloba uvifera), and the coconut (Cocos nucifera) [See Table 2.3].<br />
The landward or western extent <strong>of</strong> the littoral forest was characterized by open grasslands and<br />
internal ponds which were for the most part rain-fed. The higher elevations <strong>of</strong> the corridor was<br />
characterized by the presence <strong>of</strong> less mangrove trees and scrubs and more woodland tree species<br />
such as the Gumbo Limbo (Bursera simaruba), the May Flower (Tabebouia rosea) and the Oak<br />
(Quercus anglohondurensis), as well as open grassland punctuated by isolated pine trees (Pinus<br />
caribaea) [See Table 2.3].<br />
The shoreline <strong>of</strong> the primary coast was colonized by mangroves [See Plate. #’s 2.7 – 2.9]. There<br />
was the typical zonation <strong>of</strong> Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle), followed by Black (Avicennia<br />
germinans) and White Mangroves (Laguncularia racemosa) [See Table 2.3].<br />
However, due to the fact that both the starting and the exit point <strong>of</strong> the FOC will be on land<br />
already developed, there is no need for the clearance <strong>of</strong> any vegetation, but there are marine<br />
fauna, however not in a healthy distribution as in the fore-reef areas. As can be seen, the sea-bed<br />
is silty and muddy [See Plate 2.12]. This type <strong>of</strong> substrate basically promotes the growth <strong>of</strong> only<br />
sparse seagrass distribution and some algae as shown in Plate 2.10 & 2.11.<br />
2-48
Fig. 2.19 Land and Seabed Classification (Courtesy J. Meerman)<br />
2-49
Table 2.2: Aquatic and Terrestrial Vegetation Found in and around the Project Area<br />
Common Name Scientific Name Source<br />
&<br />
Abundance<br />
Sub-Tidal<br />
Manatee Grass Syringodium filiforme Common<br />
Patchy distribution<br />
Halimeda Halimeda spp. Occasional<br />
Patchy distribution<br />
Green Algae Penicillus spp. Rare<br />
Patchy distribution<br />
Red Algae Laurencia spp. Rare<br />
Patchy distribution<br />
Brown Algae Dictyota linearis Occasional and patchy distribution<br />
Shaving Brush Algae Penicillus spp. Occasional and patchy distribution<br />
Mangroves<br />
Red Mangrove Rhizophora mangle Abundant<br />
Definitive stands<br />
White Mangrove Laguncularia racemosa Sparse<br />
Does not occur in distinct zones<br />
Mangrove Associates<br />
Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus Rare<br />
Isolated Distribution<br />
Black Poisonwood Metopium brownie Rare<br />
Isolated Distribution<br />
Sea Grape Coccoloba belizensis Occasional<br />
Isolated Distribution<br />
Woodland Vegetation<br />
Coconut Cocos nucifera Occasional<br />
Isolated Distribution<br />
Oak Quercus anglohondurensis Occasional<br />
Isolated Distribution<br />
Cockspur Acacia cookie Occasional<br />
Random Distribution<br />
Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia Occasional, limited distribution<br />
Palmetto Schippia concolor Occasional<br />
Patchy Distribution<br />
Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba Occasional<br />
Random distribution<br />
Mayflower Tabebouia rosea Rare<br />
Isolated distribution<br />
Bay Leaf Sabal mauritiformis Common<br />
Random distribution<br />
Saw Grass Cladium jamaicense Common, landform specific<br />
distribution<br />
2-50
Plate 2.6: Saw Grass Thicket adjacent to Plate2.7: Dwarf Mangrove Stand – Note<br />
Transmission line corridor (Mainland:ML) Moss- Dominated Forest Floor (ML)<br />
Plate 2.8: Primary Coast adjacent to Project Site Plate 2.9: Primary Coast adjacent to Project<br />
on ML, Downstream <strong>of</strong> project corridor corridor on ML, Upstream <strong>of</strong> landing site<br />
Plate 2.10: Sparse seagrass found in corridor Plate 2.11: Shaving brush algae<br />
2-51
Plate 2.12: Substrate along project corridor, note depth <strong>of</strong> silt, at least 12-14 ins.<br />
(note the divers hand is in the silt to his elbow)<br />
2.2.2 Aquatic Fauna<br />
2.2.2.1 Invertebrates<br />
Stage 2 <strong>of</strong> the project corridor was characterized by the presence <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> macroinvertebrates:<br />
Prominent among these were the crustaceans and molluscs. Familiar crustaceans<br />
encountered during the field survey or reported otherwise were the Blue Land Crab (Ucides sp.),<br />
the Fiddler Crab (Aratus pisonii), the Blue Crab or ‘Raati’ (Callinectes sapidus), and the Soldier<br />
Crab (Calcinus tibicen) [See Table 2.4]. The most abundant <strong>of</strong> these invertebrates on-shore were<br />
the Blue Land Crab (Ucides sp.) and the Soldier Crab ( Calcinus tibicen). The Blue Crab<br />
(Callinectes sapidus) and the Red Land Crab ( Grapsus grapsus) [See Plate 2.16] was fairly<br />
abundant in the nearshore areas <strong>of</strong> the primary sea coast.<br />
The Lobster (Panulirus argus) and the Caribbean King Crab (Mithrax spinossisimus) occurred in<br />
commercially exploitable quantities in the <strong>of</strong>fshore areas.<br />
The mollusks that were prominent in the area included: the Queen Conch (Strombus gigas) [See<br />
Table 2.3], Horse Conch ( Pleuroplanca gigantea) [See Table 2.4], the Mangrove Oyster<br />
(Crassostrea rhizophorea) [See Table 2.4], the Faust Tellin (Acraphagia fausta) [See Plate 2.14],<br />
the Common Atlantic Vase ( Vasum muricatum) [See Plate 2.11], and the Tulip Snail<br />
(Fasciolaria tulipa) [See Plate 2.10]. The Common Atlantic Vase (Vasum muricatum) was the<br />
most abundant mollusk and occurred in significant quantities in the near shore sea grass beds<br />
south <strong>of</strong> the outfall <strong>of</strong> the Mid-Winters Lagoon Estuary. The lobster (Panulirus argus) and the<br />
conch (Strombus gigas) were found mainly in the <strong>of</strong>fshore waters <strong>of</strong> the project site near San<br />
Pedro.<br />
2-52
The other invertebrate group found in the area that is noteworthy <strong>of</strong> mention is the echinoderms.<br />
This includes the Sea Star (Oreaster reticularis), the Donkey Dung Sea Cucumber (Holothuria<br />
mexicana), and the Sea Urchin (Tripneustes ventricosus). These animals were found mainly in<br />
the <strong>of</strong>fshore sea grass area [See Table 2.4].<br />
Table 2.3: Marine Macro-Invertebrates Found in and Around the Project Corridor<br />
Common Name Scientific Name Observed During<br />
Survey<br />
Blue Land Crab Ucides sp. <br />
Fiddler Crab Aratus pisonii <br />
Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus <br />
Red Land Crab Grapsus grapsus <br />
Hermit Crab<br />
(Soldier Crab)<br />
Calcinus tibicen <br />
2-53<br />
Reported Anecdotally<br />
Caribbean King<br />
Crab<br />
Mithrax spinossisimus <br />
Spiny Lobster Panulirus argus <br />
Slipper Lobster Scyllarides<br />
aequinoctialis<br />
Barnacle Lepas anatifera <br />
White Shrimp Peneaus schmitti <br />
Snapping Shrimp Gonodactylus oerstedii <br />
Queen Conch Strombus gigas <br />
Horse Conch Pleuroplanca gigantean <br />
Tulip Conch Fasciolaria tulipa <br />
Common<br />
Atlantic Vase<br />
Vasum muricatum <br />
Faust Tellin Acraphagia fausta <br />
Buttercup Lucine Anodontia alba <br />
Caribbean<br />
Thorny Oyster<br />
Spondylus caribaeum <br />
Periwinkle Littorina angulifera
Common Name Scientific Name Observed During<br />
Survey<br />
Mangrove Oyster Crassostrea rhizophorea <br />
American Oyster Crassostrea virginica <br />
Brittle Star Ophioderma<br />
brevicaudum<br />
<br />
Sea Urchin Tripneustes ventricosus <br />
Sea Star Oreaster reticularis <br />
Donkey Dung<br />
Sea Cucumber<br />
Holothuria mexicana <br />
2-54<br />
Reported Anecdotally<br />
Plate 2.13: Tulip Snail – Fasciolaria tulipa Plate 2.14: Common Atlantic Vase –<br />
Vasum muricat<br />
Plate 2.15: Unidentifiable Artifact Plate 2.16: Barnacle – Lepas anatifera
Plate 2.17: Faust Tellin – Acraphagia fuasta Plate 2.18: Tulip Snail – Fasciolaria<br />
tulipa [Left] & Hermit Crab - Calcinus<br />
tibicen [Right]<br />
Plate 2.19: Red Land Crab – Grapsus grapsus Plate 2.20: Grapsus grapsus [Ventral<br />
[Dorsal View] View]<br />
Plate 2.21: Caribbean King Crab - Mithrax Plate 2.22: Caribbean King Crab – Mithrax<br />
spinossisimus [Dorsal View] spinossisimus [Ventral View]<br />
2-55
2.2.2.2 Fishes<br />
Plate 2.23: Caribbean King Crab – Mithrax<br />
Spinossisimus [Left] & Red Land Crab Grapsus<br />
grapsus [Right]<br />
The fishes found in the surrounding areas <strong>of</strong> the project corridor are diverse. Although no<br />
biomass studies were done in relation to the current undertaking, anecdotal evidence indicates<br />
that the area has historically been productive [Pers. comm. Roy Swasey]. The diversity <strong>of</strong> fishlife<br />
in the surrounding areas <strong>of</strong> the beginning <strong>of</strong> the marine section <strong>of</strong> the project corridor is in<br />
large measure attributable to an estuarine influence on the habitat [Pers. comm. G. Myvett].<br />
The fishes also reflected a range <strong>of</strong> forms in terms <strong>of</strong> feeding ecology, as well as in relation to<br />
ancestry and adaptability to saline influences, or indeed the lack there<strong>of</strong>. In relation to the issue<br />
<strong>of</strong> feeding ecology, there was the presence <strong>of</strong> piscivorous stocks such as the Barracuda<br />
(Sphyraena baracuda), the Crevalle Jack ( Caranx hippos) and the Bull Shark ( Carcharhinus<br />
leucas), as well as herbivorous browsers such as the Atlantic Spade Fish (Chaetodipterus faber),<br />
the Least Puffer or ‘Mutruse’ (Sphoeroides nephelus) and the Mexican Molly ( Poecilia<br />
mexicana) [See Table 2.5]. There were also carnivorous benthivores present such as the Southern<br />
Sheeps Head ( Archosargus probatocephalus) and the Mayan Cichlid or ‘Crana’ ( Cichlasoma<br />
2-56
urophthalmus). Species such as the Sea Bream ( Archosargus rhomboidalis), the Sprat<br />
(Harengula clupeola) and the Thread Shad ( Dorosoma petenense) that are carnivorous<br />
zooplanktivores were also noted [See Table 2.5]. These fishes generally feed on minute<br />
inverteberates and larval fishes suspended in the water column [See Table 2.5].<br />
There were no ‘primary’ freshwater stocks found in the area. The freshwater stocks found were<br />
‘secondary’ and ‘peripheral’ species. The secondary freshwater stocks, which are species that are<br />
fundamentally <strong>of</strong> freshwater origin but with some evolutionary history associated with marine or<br />
brackish water, were limited in the area. These included the Crana (Cichlasoma urophthalmus),<br />
the Mosquito Fish (Gambusia luma) and the Alligator Fish (Belonesox belizanous) [See Table<br />
2.5]. The ‘peripheral’ freshwater stocks, which are marine species that are known to penetrate<br />
freshwater and low salinity environments, included the Bull Shark (Carcharhinus leucas), the<br />
Tarpon (Megalop atlanticus) and the Crevalle Jack (Caranx hippos) [See Table 2.5].<br />
The general area was also inhabited by euryhaline stocks and stenohaline marine species. The<br />
resident euryhaline stocks, which entails species that have adapted to live in brackish water<br />
somewhat permanently [Pers. comm. G. Myvett], includes: the Black Snapper ( Lutjanus<br />
buccanella) [See Table 2.4], the Common Snook (Centropomus undecimalis) [See Table 2.5],<br />
the Caitipa Mojarra (Diapterus rhombeus) [See Plate 2.24], and the White Mullet ( Mugil<br />
curema) [See Table 2.5]. The stenohaline stocks, which are marine species that have evolved in<br />
full-strength seawater and that are incapable <strong>of</strong> withstanding or adapting to low salinity waters or<br />
freshwater, include the Mackerel ( Scomberomorus maculatus), the Barracuda ( Sphyraena<br />
barracuda), and the Bluestriped Grunt (Haemulon sciurus).<br />
Table 2.4: Fish Species Found in Project Area<br />
Common Name Scientific Name Captured or<br />
Observed<br />
2-57<br />
Reported<br />
(Anecdotally)<br />
Common Snook Centropomus undecimalis √<br />
Sprat or Scaled<br />
Herring<br />
Harengula clupeola √<br />
Tarpon Megalop atlanticus √<br />
White Mullet<br />
(Mullet)<br />
Mugil curema √<br />
Blackfin Snapper<br />
(Black Snapper)<br />
Lutjanus buccanella √<br />
Gray Snapper Lutjanus griseus √<br />
Dog Snapper Lutjanus joco √<br />
Mahogany Snapper Lutjanus mahogoni √<br />
Crevalle Jack<br />
(Jack Cuballi)<br />
Caranx hippos √
Common Name Scientific Name Captured or Reported<br />
Observed (Anecdotally)<br />
Permit Selene vomer √<br />
Permit Trachinotus falcatus √<br />
Mackerel<br />
Scomberomorus<br />
√<br />
(Spanish Mackerel) maculates<br />
Barracuda Sphyraena barracuda √<br />
Jewfish Epinephelus itajara √<br />
Bluestriped Grunt Haemulon sciurus √<br />
Burro Grunt Pomadasys crocro √<br />
Bull Shark Carcharhinus leucas √<br />
Sting Ray<br />
(Tingre)<br />
Dasyatis Americana √<br />
Striped Mojarra<br />
(Stone Bass)<br />
Eugerres plumieri √<br />
Caitipa Mojarra<br />
(Mojarra)<br />
Diapterus rhombeus √<br />
Sea Bream Archosargus rhomboidalis √<br />
Southern<br />
Archosargus<br />
√<br />
Sheepshead probatocephalus<br />
Star Drum<br />
(Drummer)<br />
Stellifer colonensis √<br />
Threadfin Shad<br />
(Shad)<br />
Dorosoma petenense √<br />
Atlantic Spade Fish Chaetodipterus faber √<br />
Least Puffer<br />
(Mutruse)<br />
Sphoeroides nephelus √<br />
Needle Fish<br />
(Long Guard)<br />
Strongylura notata √<br />
Mayan Catfish<br />
(Catto)<br />
Ariopsis assimilis √<br />
Mayan Cichlid<br />
(Crana)<br />
Cichlasoma urophthalmus √<br />
Mosquito Fish Gambusia luma √<br />
Mexican Molly Poecilia mexicana √<br />
Alligator Fish Belonesox belizanous √<br />
2-58
Plate 2.24: Mayan Catfish – Ariopsis assimilis Plate 2.25: Gray Snapper – Lutjanus<br />
griseus<br />
Plate 2.26: [Top] Gray Snapper – Lutjanus Plate 2.27: Caitipa Mojarra – Diapterus<br />
griseus; [Bottom] Dog Snapper – Lutjanus rhombeus<br />
joco<br />
2-59
Plate 2.28: Mahogany Snapper – Lutjanus Plate 2.29: Sea Bream – Archosargus<br />
mahogoni rhomboidalis<br />
Plate 2.30: Burro Grunt – Pomadasys crocro Plate 2.31: Bluestriped Grunt –<br />
Haemulon sciurus<br />
2-60
Plate 2.32: [Top] Atlantic Spadefish, juvenile Plate 2.33: Gray Snapper - Lutjanus<br />
- Chaetodipterus faber; [Bottom] Atlantic griseus<br />
Spadefish adult – Chaetodipterus faber<br />
Plate 2.34: Lookdown – Selene vomer Plate 2.35: Blue Striped Grunt –<br />
Haemulon Sciurus<br />
2-61
Plate 2.36: Yellow Stingray – Urolophus Plate 2.37: Collection <strong>of</strong> fish sampled by<br />
jamaicensis Cast Nets<br />
Plate 2.38: Close-up <strong>of</strong> fish sampled by Cast Nets<br />
In general much <strong>of</strong> the stenohaline species were found and/or reported to be seen or harvested in<br />
the <strong>of</strong>f-shore areas or alternately in the nearshore areas <strong>of</strong> the primary coast or seashore proper.<br />
The <strong>of</strong>fshore waters are in general a part <strong>of</strong> the ‘shelf lagoon’ lying between the barrier reef<br />
platform and the mainland coast, and are for the most part undiluted or <strong>of</strong> ‘oceanic quality’,<br />
which is characterized by high salinity. T he salinity <strong>of</strong> the nearshore waters along the primary<br />
coast are influenced by two (2) opposite effects, viz the high salinity inputs from <strong>of</strong>fshore<br />
sources, and low salinity inputs or freshwater influences from upland areas.<br />
The high salinity influences in the nearshore areas depend on the season <strong>of</strong> the year, or more<br />
specifically the amount <strong>of</strong> freshwater run-<strong>of</strong>f impacting the area, and the specific phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
daily tides. During the rising tide, the nearshore areas is inundated by oceanic quality water with<br />
high saline content from the wider marine environment; during the falling tide these areas are<br />
influenced by the waters with relatively low salinities from the internal lagoonal systems <strong>of</strong> the<br />
overall Mid-Winters wetland system which are exiting the area through the outfall <strong>of</strong> the estuary.<br />
2-62
The degree <strong>of</strong> saline influences is dependent on the season <strong>of</strong> the year, with the greater<br />
freshwater or dilution influences accruing during the rainy season.<br />
In general the stenohaline oceanic species would inhabit the nearshore areas <strong>of</strong> the primary sea<br />
coast, the lower end <strong>of</strong> the internal lagoons and the area <strong>of</strong> the outfall <strong>of</strong> the estuary during the<br />
rising tide. Much <strong>of</strong> these stocks would be the larger predatory species such as the Permit<br />
(Trachinotus falcatus), the Mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) and the Barracuda (Sphyraena<br />
barracuda) [See Table 2.4].<br />
The areas <strong>of</strong> the outfall <strong>of</strong> the estuary and internal lagoons are inhabited by secondary freshwater<br />
species and euryhaline stocks such as the ‘Crana’ (Cichlasoma urophthalmus) [See Table 2.4],<br />
the ‘Catto’ (Ariopsis assimilis) [See Plate 2.21], and the Look Down (Selene vomer) [See Plate<br />
2.31] during the falling tides and in general during the rainy season. The secondary freshwater<br />
stocks that adapted to lower salinities and wholly freshwater systems include: the Mosquito Fish,<br />
the Mexican Molly and the Alligator Fish - these species are more prominent in the supra-tidal<br />
internal ponds <strong>of</strong> the mangrove system [Pers. comm.., G. Myvett].<br />
2.2.2.3 Other Vertebrate Fauna<br />
2.2.2.3.1 Amphibians<br />
Only three (3) species <strong>of</strong> Amphibians were found in the areas adjacent to the project corridor.<br />
These included the Marine toad ( Bufo marinus), the Common Mexican Tree Frog ( Similisca<br />
baudinii) and the Mexican White-lipped Tree Frog (Leptodactylus labialis) [See Table 2.6]. This<br />
paucity in species diversity is typical <strong>of</strong> mangrove-dominated areas.<br />
Table 2.5: Other Vertebrates Found or Reported in or around Project Area<br />
Common Name Scientific Name Observed During<br />
2-63<br />
Survey<br />
Reported<br />
Anecdotally<br />
Reptiles<br />
American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus √<br />
Morelet’s Crocodile Crocodylus moreleti √<br />
Black-bellied Turtle Rhinoclemys scripta √<br />
Narrowbridge Musk Turtle Claudius angustatus √<br />
Boa Constrictor Boa Constrictor √<br />
Black Tail<br />
Indigo<br />
Drymarchon corais √<br />
Green Vine Snake Oxybelis fulgidus √<br />
Green Tree Snake Leptophis ahaetulla √<br />
Central American Coral<br />
Snake<br />
Micrurus diastema √<br />
Striped Basilisk or Cock<br />
Maklala<br />
Basiliscus vittatus √<br />
Wish Willy or Spiny tailed<br />
Iguana<br />
Ctenosaura similes √
Common Name Scientific Name Observed During<br />
Survey<br />
Green Iguana Iguana iguana √<br />
2-64<br />
Reported<br />
Anecdotally<br />
Amphibians<br />
Marine Toad Bufo marinus √<br />
Mexican White-lipped Tree<br />
Frog<br />
Leptodactylus labialis √<br />
Common Mexican<br />
Treefrog<br />
Mammals<br />
Smilisca baudinii √<br />
West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus √<br />
Bottle-nose Dolphin Tursiops truncatus √<br />
Gibnut Agouti paca √<br />
Mexican Porcupine Coendou mexicanus √<br />
Yucatan Squirrel Sciurus yucatanensis √<br />
Common Opossum Didelphis marsupialis √<br />
Raccoon Procyon lotor √<br />
Armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus √<br />
White-tailed Deer Odocoileus virginiana √<br />
Striped Hog-nosed Skunk Conepatus semistriatus √<br />
Quash or White nosed<br />
Coati<br />
Nasua narica √<br />
Grey Fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus √<br />
Northern Tamandua Tamandua mexicana √<br />
Kinkajou or<br />
Potos flavus √<br />
Night Walker<br />
Tayra or Bush Dog Eira barbara √<br />
Collared Peccary Tayassu tajacu √<br />
2.2.2.3.2 Reptiles<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> snakes and lizards, as well as turtles and crocodilians were also present in the areas<br />
adjacent to the project corridor. In the case <strong>of</strong> the latter, both the Morelet Crocodile (Crocodylus<br />
moreleti) and the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) are known to inhabit the area [Table<br />
2.6]. The American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) has been observed in the lower areas <strong>of</strong> Mid-<br />
Winters Lagoon near its junction with the sea. The Morelet Crocodile (Crocodylus moreleti) has<br />
been observed in the mangrove channels, ostensibly where there was a greater <strong>of</strong> freshwater<br />
inputs into its habitat.<br />
Familiar lizards in the area included the Cock Maklala or Jesus Christ Lizard ( Basiliscus<br />
vittatus), the Iguana (Iguana iguana) and the Wish Willy or Scaly Iguana (Ctenosaura similis).<br />
These animals were found throughout the ‘terrestrial’ range <strong>of</strong> habitat <strong>of</strong> the corridor.
The snakes that inhabit the area include the Boa Constrictor ( Boa Constrictor), Black Tail<br />
(Drymarchon corais), and the Green Tommy G<strong>of</strong>f (Leptophis ahaetulla) [See Table 2.6].<br />
2.2.2.3.3 Mammals<br />
The surrounding areas <strong>of</strong> Stage 1 <strong>of</strong> the project corridor are fairly rich in mammalian fauna.<br />
These included those associated with the mangrove and littoral forest environment such as the<br />
opossum (Didelphis marsupialis) and the Coati (Nasua narica) as well as those associated with<br />
pine ridge and open grassland such as the White-tailed Deer ( Odocoileus virginiana) and the<br />
Gray Fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) [See Table 2.6].<br />
Aquatic mammals were also reported in the general area. These included the Bottle-nose Dolphin<br />
(Tursiops truncatus) and the West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus) [See Table 2.6]. It is<br />
noteworthy to point out that the area has not been identified as being <strong>of</strong> any singular importance<br />
for the manatee (Trichechus manatus), relevant to for example the Belize City area and Corozal<br />
Bay.<br />
2.2.2.3.4 Birds<br />
Point counts and transect census <strong>of</strong> the proposed development site produced a total <strong>of</strong> (40)<br />
species <strong>of</strong> birds [See Table 2.7]. The birds were recorded during a (24) hour monitoring period.<br />
The bird surveys was conducted on the three main habitats identified on the property, they are<br />
Mangrove mixed with Littoral Forest, Coastline and Lagoon. The lagoon and coastline survey<br />
was done using a Fiber glass canoe and the Mangrove survey was done on foot. The results<br />
show that a number <strong>of</strong> North American migrants have arrived, and are using the adjacent areas to<br />
the project corridor as feeding and roosting grounds.<br />
Table 2.6: List <strong>of</strong> birds identified on the site<br />
Family Name Genus Species English Name Abundance,<br />
Seasonality<br />
Pelicans Pelecanus occidentalis Brown Pelican v-V<br />
Cormorants Phalacrocorax<br />
brasilianus<br />
Neotropic Cormorant v-P<br />
Frigate birds Fregata magnificens Magnificent Frigatebird v-V<br />
Herons & Egrets Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron c-V<br />
Ardea Alba Great Egret v-P<br />
Egretta caerulea Little Blue Heron v-W<br />
Egretta Tricolor Tricolored Heron c-V<br />
Butorides virescens Green Heron c-P<br />
Nyctanassa violacea Yellow Crowned Night<br />
Heron<br />
f-P<br />
Ibises Eudocimus albus White Ibis l-W<br />
Spoonbills Ajaia Ajaja Roseate Spoonbill f-W<br />
2-65
Family Name Genus Species English Name Abundance,<br />
Seasonality<br />
Vultures Coragyps atratus Black Vulture v-P<br />
Cathartes aura Turkey Vulture v-P<br />
Plovers Pluvialis squatarola Black-bellied Plover f-W<br />
Charadrius semipalmatus Semipalmated Plover f-W<br />
Chararius vociferus Killdeer f-W<br />
Stilts Himantopus mexicanus Black-necked Stilt l-P<br />
Sandpipers Tringa melanoleuca Greater Yellowlegs f-W<br />
Triga falvipes Solitary Sandpiper f-W<br />
Catoptrophorus<br />
Willet u-W<br />
semipalmatus<br />
Actitis macularia Spotted Sandpiper c-W<br />
Calidris pusilla Semipalmated Sandpiper l-TL<br />
Limnodromus griseus Short-billed Dowitcher f-W<br />
Gulls & Terns Larus atricilla Laughing Gull v-V<br />
Sterna caspia Caspian Tern f-W<br />
Sterna maxima Royal Tern c-V<br />
Pigeons &<br />
Doves<br />
Sterna sandvicensis Sandwich Tern v-V<br />
Columba cayennensis Pale-Vented Pigeon v-P<br />
Columba leucocephala White-Crowned Pigeon u-P<br />
Swift Panyptila cayennensis Lesser<br />
Swift<br />
Swallow-Tailed f-P<br />
Hummingbirds Anthracothorax prevostii Green-Breasted Mango u-P<br />
Woodpeckers Melanerpes aurifrons Golden-<br />
Woodpecker<br />
Fronted<br />
Flycatchers Pitangus sulphuratus Great Kiskadee v-P<br />
Myiozetetes similis Social Flycatcher v-P<br />
Tyrannus melancholicus Tropical Kingbird v-P<br />
Vireos Vireo pallens Mangrove Vireo c-P<br />
Swallows Tachycineta albilinea Mangrove Swallow c-P<br />
Mockingbirds Melanoptila glabrirostris Black Catbird l-P<br />
Mimus gilvus Tropical Mockingbird c-P<br />
2-66<br />
c-P
Key to symbols for Abundance:<br />
v = very common c = common f = fairly common u = uncommon<br />
r = rare o = occasional l = uncommon locally but absent in districts<br />
Key to symbols for Seasonality:<br />
P = Permanent Resident S = Seasonal Resident V = Visitor T = Transient<br />
W = Winter Resident X = Known from only two records.<br />
2.2.2.4 Methodology<br />
The methodologies employed for the result <strong>of</strong> the above surveys are delineated in Table 2.7B.<br />
The Reef Fish, Creature and Coral identification books by Human and deLoach were utilized to<br />
identify all marine life, while the bird list is arranged in accordance with the sequence and<br />
nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the American Ornithologist Union. The Key to Symbols for Abundance and<br />
Seasonality was adopted from Checklist <strong>of</strong> the Birds <strong>of</strong> Belize compiled by Lee Jones and A.C.<br />
Vallely, 2001.<br />
2-67
Table 2.6B: Summary <strong>of</strong> methodologies employed in characterization <strong>of</strong> bio-physical environment<br />
Subject Purpose Methodology Output<br />
Fin-Fish Census <strong>of</strong> species Snorkel survey <strong>of</strong> 6areas with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 100 m transects, List <strong>of</strong> species found, outlined<br />
characterization within project area which comprise <strong>of</strong> the entire project corridor. A diver tow<br />
method was also utilized at intervals in between the 7 selected<br />
in Table 2.4 (Fish)<br />
sites so as to encompass a wider survey area.<br />
Output is qualitative in<br />
Within the lagoonal area, due to depth and mud constraints,<br />
visual surface surveys were conducted.<br />
orientation<br />
Invertebrate Census <strong>of</strong> Epi- Snorkel survey <strong>of</strong> 6areas with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 100 m transects, List <strong>of</strong> species found, outlined<br />
characterization benthicmacro- which comprise <strong>of</strong> the entire project corridor. A diver tow in and Table 2.3 (Inverts)<br />
invertebrates method was also utilized at intervals in between the 7 selected<br />
sites so as to encompass a wider survey area.<br />
Output is qualitative in<br />
Within the lagoonal area, due to depth and mud constraints,<br />
visual surface surveys were conducted.<br />
orientation<br />
Aquatic and To record presence Engaging in 2 boat surveys <strong>of</strong> the project corridor comprising List <strong>of</strong> species and nature <strong>of</strong><br />
Semi-Aquatic <strong>of</strong> species within <strong>of</strong> a captain and spotter.<br />
environment in which found,<br />
Mammal and project area<br />
outlined in Table 2.6<br />
Reptile<br />
(Mammals) and Table 2.5<br />
characterization<br />
(Reptiles)<br />
Output is qualitative in<br />
orientation<br />
Aquatic Plant To record presence Snorkel survey <strong>of</strong> 6areas with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 100 m transects, List <strong>of</strong> species found, outlined<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> species in project which comprise <strong>of</strong> the entire project corridor. A diver tow in and Table 2.2B (Sub-Tidal))<br />
area<br />
method was also utilized at intervals in between the 7 selected<br />
sites so as to encompass a wider survey area.<br />
Output is qualitative in<br />
Within the lagoonal area, due to depth and mud constraints,<br />
visual surface surveys were conducted<br />
orientation<br />
Bird<br />
To record presence Conduct sea, lagoon and land based surveys along the coast, List <strong>of</strong> species found, outlined<br />
characterization <strong>of</strong> species in project encompassing the fringing mangroves areas, and the project in and Table 2.7 (Birds))<br />
area<br />
corridor.<br />
Output is qualitative in<br />
orientation<br />
2-68
2.3 Conservation Issues<br />
The conservation issues in regards to the proposed undertaking relates to both conservation areas<br />
and species <strong>of</strong> special interest. The Hol Chan Marine Reserve is one <strong>of</strong> the oldest and most<br />
visited Marine Reserve [See Fig. 2.18]. Relatedly, in terms <strong>of</strong> the issue <strong>of</strong> ‘conservation area’<br />
status, some <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring marine areas have been identified as important recruitment and<br />
nursery sites for a number <strong>of</strong> economically viable species.<br />
There is also the Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve and National Park, The Caye Caulker Marine<br />
Reserve and National Park and the Swallow Cayes Wildlife Sanctuary which are either in close<br />
proximity or relative to the development site [See Fig. 2.18]. Taking this into consideration the<br />
developers <strong>of</strong> this project have ensured that all conservation issues are addressed to the fullest.<br />
As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, it is these same resources that attract the end users to the Country, thus to the<br />
development being proposed will provide service to encompass hotels, villas, private homes and<br />
much more.<br />
It is therefore, <strong>of</strong> utmost importance that the project not degrades the environment to a state that<br />
it will diminish the resources that already exists within the area.<br />
2.3.1 Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Special Significance<br />
There are a number <strong>of</strong> threatened and endangered species. These include sea turtles, crocodiles,<br />
marine mammals and birds.<br />
The sea turtles <strong>of</strong> relevance are the Green Turtle ( Chelonia mydas), the Hawksbill Turtle<br />
(Eretmochelys imbricata), and the Loggerhead ( Caretta caretta). There are no documented<br />
nesting sites <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> these species in the project corridor.<br />
The Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) is listed in the CITES Regulations which means<br />
that the species is threatened with extinction and is or would be affected by trade. Trade in the<br />
Hawksbill ( Eretmochelys imbricata) in compliance with the goals <strong>of</strong> the convention, must be<br />
accompanied by the strictest <strong>of</strong> regulations to ensure that the species is not further imperiled, and<br />
should only be authorized under exceptional circumstances. The Fisheries Regulations were<br />
strengthened in 2003 in regards to the Hawksbill ( Eretmochelys imbricata) and sea turtles in<br />
general: SI 66 <strong>of</strong> 2002, Reg. 2 prohibits the harvesting <strong>of</strong> sea turtles.<br />
Prior to this amendment in the Fisheries Act, harvest was regulated by size limits and closed<br />
season. In addition to the issue <strong>of</strong> the harvesting and trade, the nesting sites the Hawks Bill<br />
Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) are also protected. SI 66 <strong>of</strong> 2002 Reg. 3 prohibits the taking <strong>of</strong><br />
turtle eggs or the interference with any nesting site(s). The CITES listing <strong>of</strong> the Hawksbill<br />
(Eretmochelys imbricata) and the follow-on national legislations derives from a recognition <strong>of</strong><br />
the reduced number <strong>of</strong> individuals in the wild and the inferred or projected continuation in the<br />
decline <strong>of</strong> the population. The perceived decline and degradation <strong>of</strong> the habitat <strong>of</strong> Turtle was also<br />
a valid consideration in relation to the subscription to principles <strong>of</strong> CITES and the consequent<br />
strengthening national legislations.<br />
2-69
The proposed project will not in any way impact or erode the integrity <strong>of</strong> the nesting sites or<br />
aquatic habitat <strong>of</strong> the Hawks Bill (Eretmochelys imbricata), or indeed in any way to contribute to<br />
any perceived or real decline in the abundance or distribution <strong>of</strong> the species. Apart from the<br />
CITES Designation and national legislation, the Hawks Bill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) is<br />
listed as “Critically Endangered” by IUCN.<br />
The Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) is also listed in CITES. All <strong>of</strong> the provisions relating to the<br />
Hawks Bill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) in regard to CITES as well as national legislations<br />
also apply to the species. Allowances are made however for the utilization <strong>of</strong> the Green Turtle<br />
for cultural reasons: SI 66 <strong>of</strong> 2002 Reg. #5 stipulates that permission can be obtained from the<br />
Fisheries Administrator for those parties that would qualify. It has been reported to be taken<br />
occasionally by fishermen in <strong>of</strong>fshore areas. Apart from the CITES Designation and national<br />
legislation, the Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) is listed as “Endangered” by IUCN.<br />
The American Crocodile ( Crocodylus acutus) was not seen during the survey efforts by the<br />
Tunich-Nah Team, however, sitings have been reported throughout the year due to the fact that<br />
its ecological range certainly embraces the area. The American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus)<br />
has in fact been reported to range all along the Belizean coast and coastal lagoons, including the<br />
islands that are situated between the mainland and the barrier reef. The American Crocodile<br />
(Crocodylus acutus) has been listed in Appendix I <strong>of</strong> the CITES Regulations. The Forest Act<br />
also prohibits the hunting or exploitation <strong>of</strong> this species otherwise. The American Crocodile<br />
(Crocodylus acutus) has been listed as “Vulnerable” by IUCN. The proposed project is in no<br />
way designed to destroy, erode or to otherwise negatively impact the populations <strong>of</strong> crocodiles<br />
that may be found in the area.<br />
Manatees (Trichechus manatus) have been reported generally in all areas around the projects site<br />
including the barrier lagoon. The Tunich-Nah Survey Team did not have documented sightings<br />
in the project area during the site-specific survey. The latest aerial surveys by the CZMA/I also<br />
identified all areas around the project area and the barrier lagoon in front <strong>of</strong> the site as a habitat<br />
for manatees. The presence <strong>of</strong> manatees (Trichechus manatus) in the project area may be as a<br />
result <strong>of</strong> the fact that the area is thoroughfare for manatees to reach their prime habitat located in<br />
the swallows caye area, <strong>of</strong> which was declared a sanctuary for the species. The Manatee<br />
(Trichechus manatus) has been listed in Appendix I <strong>of</strong> the CITES Regulations. The Manatee<br />
(Trichechus manatus) has been listed as “Vulnerable” in the IUCN Registry <strong>of</strong> species.<br />
In the zoological report for the “National Protected Areas Systems Plan for Belize” [Miller and<br />
Miller, 1995], mention was made <strong>of</strong> the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the Black Catbird ( Melanoptila<br />
glabrirostris). This bird is a regional endemic species with a narrow range that is limited to the<br />
east coast <strong>of</strong> the Yucatan and northeastern Belize [Phillips, 1986].<br />
American Crocodile – The range <strong>of</strong> the American Crocodile (C. acutus) extends from Central<br />
Mexico and South Florida to Northern South America and the Caribbean Islands. This specie had<br />
been exterminated over most <strong>of</strong> its range and although it appears to be on the rebound the<br />
evidence is too tenuous to warrant a re-designation at this time.<br />
2-70
In Belize, there is general confusion over the identification <strong>of</strong> this specie and C. Moreletti<br />
resulting in frequent misidentifications. In general C. acutus is found along the coast and<br />
<strong>of</strong>fshore cayes, while C. moreletti is most <strong>of</strong>ten associated with inland waterways. To compound<br />
this confusion, the population <strong>of</strong> C. moreletti appears to be rebounding faster than C. acutus and<br />
may be invading traditional parts <strong>of</strong> its range. As a result a sympatric association with C. acutus<br />
has evolved (Platt and Montanucci, 1993).<br />
It has even been suggested that there may be miscegenation between the two species, resulting in<br />
hybridized <strong>of</strong>fspring (Thorbjarnarson, 1994; Platt, 1994). Crocodiles have always inspired fear<br />
in people who have an innate fear <strong>of</strong> being preyed upon or losing domestic animals to the<br />
feeding habits <strong>of</strong> this animal.<br />
With effective conservation measures, populations have shown a remarkable capacity to<br />
rebound. Indeed C. moreletti is now ubiquitous in Belize, penetrating even into densely<br />
populated areas, in the process raising the ire <strong>of</strong> the citizenry, who consider it a threat and are<br />
calling for firm measures to control its populations.<br />
Sea Turtle ( Chelonia midas, Eretmochelys imbricata, Caretta caretta) - Although all six<br />
species that are protected by the Fisheries Regualtions pass through the territorial waters <strong>of</strong><br />
Belize on their annual migratory routes, three species stand out as known endemic species, their<br />
names indelibly etched in the popular imagination, having earned their place within the fishing<br />
industry and <strong>of</strong>fshoot industries which depended on their exploitation. In the IUCN Red Listing<br />
for 2000 all three species, Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas), Hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata)<br />
and Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) were listed as endangered.<br />
Every year throughout the Caribbean thousands <strong>of</strong> these turtles are accidentally killed in<br />
abandoned nets and other fishing gear, while untold others have been deprived <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />
nesting sites due to coastal developments and the destruction <strong>of</strong> feeding habitats (UNDP, 1995).<br />
Still others are threatened by oil spills and chemical seepage into the coastal environment.<br />
In Belize, turtle numbers have experienced a continuous decline under pressures <strong>of</strong> over<br />
harvesting as evidenced by the decline in number <strong>of</strong> catch per unit effort and the readily<br />
observed decrease in the average weight <strong>of</strong> the landed catch (60% from 1982 to 1986) (CZMAI,<br />
1995).<br />
Hawksbills are the most endangered <strong>of</strong> the resident sea turtles, (IUCN listed as critically<br />
endangered), preferring instead the southern waters <strong>of</strong> Belize. The specie however, depends on<br />
the entire reef system <strong>of</strong> Belize for its survival, where it forages extensively on seagrass beds and<br />
coral reefs.<br />
Important threats to sea turtles are, beach erosion, native predators, feral animals and wading<br />
birds, <strong>of</strong>fshore predators and the disease fibropapilloma (Smith et. al., 1992). Illegal collection<br />
and sale <strong>of</strong> eggs also take their toll as does collisions into motorboats and drowning in nets.<br />
Other hazards can be found on the beach. These include construction <strong>of</strong> sea walls and dredging<br />
works plus hatchling disorientation from artificial lights, which may prevent them reaching the<br />
sea.<br />
2-71
Manatees ( Trichechus manatus) - Belize is reputed to have the largest concentration (not<br />
population) <strong>of</strong> manatees <strong>of</strong> all the countries which are inhabited by the Caribbean Manatee<br />
(Trichechus manatus). After a reduction in numbers in 1996 following a mystery disease that<br />
killed some 200 manatees it now appears that the numbers are on the rebound.<br />
In the aerial surveys conducted in 1995, the survey team obtained an index <strong>of</strong> relative abundance<br />
(IRA) <strong>of</strong> 12.48 manatees per hour <strong>of</strong> reconnaissance effort. In the January 1999 survey the IRA<br />
value had increased to 27.81 manatees per hour <strong>of</strong> effort (CZMAI, 1999). The same 1999 survey<br />
resulted in the highest number <strong>of</strong> calf sightings ever recorded in Belize. More significantly, the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> calf sightings per total manatee observed in the dry and wet season was 13% and<br />
12.32% respectively. This number was significantly higher than the 7% usually taken to indicate<br />
a healthy and growing manatee population (Rathbun et. al. 1991).<br />
This however should not be cause for complacency. In 1999 there were 19 reported manatee<br />
strandings <strong>of</strong> which 36% were human induced while 41% were complications <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />
such as aborting <strong>of</strong> calves, abandonment etc. The remainder succumbed to poachers and boat<br />
propellers, while the cause <strong>of</strong> death for others could not be determined due to the advanced state<br />
<strong>of</strong> decomposition <strong>of</strong> the carcasses.<br />
Major efforts are underway nationally to cut down on the mortality rates <strong>of</strong> manatees and to<br />
improve on their monitoring and surveillance. The CZMAI had a collaborative project with the<br />
Wildlife Preservation Trust International to tag manatees and to track them using satellite<br />
technology. There has also been created an organization called the Belize Marine Mammal<br />
Stranding Network, which is a group dedicated to the study and conservation <strong>of</strong> marine<br />
mammals.<br />
The network consists <strong>of</strong> 4 district teams augmented by localized sub-teams, who operate in<br />
specific areas and a group <strong>of</strong> veterinarians who are available to <strong>of</strong>fer their services. This network<br />
gives the CZMAI area coverage and expertise in every major coastal region <strong>of</strong> the country<br />
enabling quick response to manatee stranding emergencies. Manatees have been reported from<br />
the back reef lagoon area <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye, although this area in general does not appear to be<br />
prime manatee habitat. In the 1999 aerial survey an adult and 2 calves were sighted in the<br />
Chetumal Bay but none were recorded near the San Pedro area <strong>of</strong> the project corridor.<br />
2.3.2 Conservation Areas<br />
In the Belize District, marine, coastal and terrestrial influences converge to create a complex and<br />
productive ecosystem. This ecosystem is a crucial component in the list <strong>of</strong> attractions that keeps<br />
visitors coming to Belize and has helped to propel this region to the forefront <strong>of</strong> the national<br />
tourism industry. Unfortunately this initial success has resulted in an accelerated pace <strong>of</strong><br />
development that now threatens the viability <strong>of</strong> the very ecosystem that made Belize a tourist<br />
attraction in the first place.<br />
This trend shows no signs <strong>of</strong> abating any time soon although its deleterious effects have not gone<br />
unnoticed. Conservation minded individuals and organization have pushed for initiatives to<br />
protect other areas <strong>of</strong> the coastal and some inland areas, and to incorporate them within the<br />
2-72
National Protected Areas System. Although all are well aware <strong>of</strong> the need for concerted action<br />
on the environmental front, and are doing their part, the establishment <strong>of</strong> these protected areas<br />
puts their management on a more solid footing ensuring that their carrying capacity is not<br />
breached, and “secures” their long term viability.<br />
2.3.3 Social Environment<br />
The social impact that the proposed project site will have on the receiving environment and<br />
surrounding community is considered as both beneficial and detrimental. There must be a<br />
balance between the impacts in order for the proposed project to get underway. It is anticipated<br />
that the development will provide economic opportunities on the longer run. The following<br />
sections describe the social assessment.<br />
2.3.3.1 Introduction<br />
Projects in the coastal marine ecosystems always produce impacts that result in temporary and<br />
permanent changes in the environment, traditional/ cultural resources and recreational uses, as<br />
well as introduce ethnic and demographical migration and dispersion. These projects modify the<br />
social and cultural environments; depending on the size and type <strong>of</strong> the project, they create or<br />
enhance economic, health, education and other benefits that are valued by society. Projects can<br />
also enhance positively the entrepreneurial and service industries, supply and demand <strong>of</strong><br />
construction materials, demand for cultural entertainment, <strong>of</strong>fer employment, etc. Social<br />
infrastructure on a whole will be impacted as this project will address the needs <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong><br />
Ambergris Caye residents, visitors and workers. The traditional users (fishers and tourism<br />
ventures) <strong>of</strong> the biological and physical resources <strong>of</strong> the area may be the most affected if<br />
mitigation measures are not addressed adequately.<br />
The proposed btl project targets the business’ that require a fast, reliable and easy means to<br />
infiltrate North American and European markets <strong>of</strong> retirees and tourists, as well as the<br />
educational system. Additionally, it will aid in local reception, by increasing the ranges <strong>of</strong> the<br />
mobile phone, and allowing real time downloading <strong>of</strong> programs such as the nightly news etc.<br />
This project has been programmed to be completed in three stages over a 15 week period. On<br />
the positive side, the project will create an increase in the demand for goods and services, such as<br />
transportation, marine and agricultural commodities, skilled labour and unskilled labour, as<br />
required with any project <strong>of</strong> this nature. It is expected, at its inception, and throughout the life <strong>of</strong><br />
the project, that it will create long-term economic employment and investment opportunities for<br />
the area, the region, and the country on a whole.<br />
The assessment identifies, analyzes, and evaluates those social impacts the proposed project may<br />
have on individuals, social groups, traditional users, and other social users <strong>of</strong> the area during the<br />
construction phase and final development phase.<br />
While the proposed project to be undertaken does have both positive and negative social impacts,<br />
the foreseen positive impacts for the local community and the region include increased<br />
2-73
employment opportunities, potential for additional local entrepreneurial initiatives, increased<br />
regional economic spin-<strong>of</strong>f for local businesses.<br />
Benefits will mostly accrue to the tourism industry. Additional positive impacts would be<br />
realized if a number <strong>of</strong> proposed environmental and community benefit options are adopted.<br />
Likely negative social impacts include traditional user accesses, increased water traffic in and to<br />
the area, increased noise, and to some degree, night lighting impacts on the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
area.<br />
2.3.3.2 Health Services<br />
Potential Impacts<br />
Pressure on health facilities by migrant worker populations<br />
Existing health facilities are inadequate to serve large groups <strong>of</strong> migrant workers as these<br />
services are already limited in the area and region.<br />
Mitigation Measures<br />
Locals can become marginalized during all phases <strong>of</strong> installation depending on the level and<br />
needs for existing services. Due to the time frame <strong>of</strong> the project, there will be no long term need<br />
for Health services. Access to health services will be provided by the developer to either Belize<br />
City or San Pedro. However, on a positive note, due to the time frame <strong>of</strong> the project, the<br />
pressure will be for a short period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />
2.3.3.3 Labor and Employment<br />
Potential Impacts<br />
Skilled labor from the area not employed<br />
Employment opportunities <strong>of</strong> all labor types<br />
Operators <strong>of</strong> equipment and machinery not fully trained<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the size and needs <strong>of</strong> the project, it is anticipated that the project will employ small<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> workers as well as other technical expertise not available in the immediate area.<br />
Mitigation Measures<br />
Employment <strong>of</strong> individuals from the area is encouraged to strengthen local community and<br />
regional skills. Locals will learn skills in all labor types. Developers should abide by the Labor<br />
Laws <strong>of</strong> Belize<br />
2-74
Worker populations should be provided with adequate services and facilities such as drinking<br />
water, basic sanitary services, and safety equipment. Workers should be trained in safety<br />
procedures. Skills transfer will be encouraged.<br />
2.3.3.4 Economic Impact<br />
Potential Impact<br />
increased temporary employment<br />
increase in business sales and products and pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />
During installation stages, there will be increased employment in the nearby villages and San<br />
Pedro. Indirect economic impact will also see a domino effect with increases in sales <strong>of</strong> services<br />
and products in the area <strong>of</strong> influence. Internet services sold at the resorts, cafes etc will also<br />
further increase incomes and pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> which a proportion will be re-spent in the local economy.<br />
Additionally, economic benefits will be generated by direct expenditure <strong>of</strong> additional visitors to<br />
the country utilizing our resources, e.g. tours and bus operators, visitations to the various sites<br />
and auxiliary services such arts and crafts, souvenirs, food and beverage, taxi service and other<br />
popular products.<br />
2.3.3.5 Project Activities<br />
Potential Impacts<br />
Transportation <strong>of</strong> materials<br />
Safety <strong>of</strong> workers<br />
Access to the area <strong>of</strong> the proposed project<br />
The location and size <strong>of</strong> the project activities for the most part are tw<strong>of</strong>old. One is on land where<br />
the FOC will be installed on existing BEL poles, while the other is the cable burial from the<br />
coast on mainland to the coast at San Pedro. During the installation stages, trucks, boats and<br />
barges will be hired to bring in materials to the project corridor, which based on the project, will<br />
change on a daily basis.<br />
Mitigation Measures<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the location and size <strong>of</strong> the project, transportation <strong>of</strong> materials and equipment should<br />
be planned in advance so that it does not coincide or disrupt traditional marine route users.<br />
The safety <strong>of</strong> workers during and after all phases should be built into project design.<br />
2.3.3.6 Disturbances (Noise/Dust)<br />
Potential Impacts<br />
Operation <strong>of</strong> machinery and equipment<br />
2-75
Disturbance from dust and smoke to neighboring facilities <strong>of</strong> the project corridor<br />
Potential air pollution from boats<br />
Construction activities may create problems with dust, noise, emission and vibration generated<br />
by construction equipment, vehicular traffic, work vessels and other similar sources. As there<br />
are no nearby communities to the project site, these impacts will affect only the construction<br />
workers at the site.<br />
Mitigation Measures<br />
Transmission <strong>of</strong> dust, noise and vibration are limited by the distance from their sources. Noise<br />
could be considerably reduced by adoption <strong>of</strong> low noise equipment. One <strong>of</strong> the main methods for<br />
controlling dust emission is water scattering along the project corridor.<br />
Air pollutants from boats are generally not yet regulated. To reduce the boat emissions, the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> type-C heavy diesel oil is recommended.<br />
2.3.3.7 Visual Impacts<br />
Potential Impact<br />
Visual impact <strong>of</strong> the project corridor and the shoreline and related lighting by vessels on<br />
the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the area<br />
The likely visual impact in the area <strong>of</strong> the proposed project would be the extent <strong>of</strong> additional<br />
night lighting such as bright lights that can affect the local flora and fauna <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />
Mitigation Measures<br />
Mitigation measures include shielding <strong>of</strong> lighting systems that will minimize the intensity <strong>of</strong><br />
light emissions on the shorelines <strong>of</strong> the mainland, lagoon and the sea. Additionally, the buoys<br />
will be lighted and the vessel lights will only be short term.<br />
2.3.3.8 Marine Traffic<br />
Potential Impacts<br />
Increased number <strong>of</strong> boats to the area<br />
Increased number <strong>of</strong> marine vessels to the area and the region<br />
Disruption <strong>of</strong> traditional user activities to the area<br />
Disruption <strong>of</strong> traditional transportation route<br />
Site development activities will have major effect on existing marine traffic. However, all user<br />
activities to the area will need to be mitigated.<br />
2-76
Mitigation Measures<br />
Use <strong>of</strong> all marine traffic through and near the area will be regulated and management systems<br />
such as buoys and markers will be positioned and fitted to facilitate day and night vessels and<br />
users to the area. All marine vessels should be serviced and maintained in proper working<br />
condition. During all phases <strong>of</strong> construction the developers should maintain open<br />
communication with all users <strong>of</strong> the area whether marine or land based.<br />
During marine phase <strong>of</strong> the project activities, alternate routes should be established for regular<br />
local cargo; safety measures should also be established for all users and workers. Areas <strong>of</strong><br />
activity for traditional users should be avoided. All (types) materials transported over water (as<br />
necessary) should be properly covered.<br />
All these issues are further discussed in the Impacts section <strong>of</strong> the document.<br />
2.3.4 Regional Demographics and Population Related Issues<br />
The Belize District is among the four larger districts in size with an area <strong>of</strong> 1,663sq. miles. The<br />
2000 Population Census showed the district had a population <strong>of</strong> 68,827 representing 20.0% <strong>of</strong><br />
the total population <strong>of</strong> Belize (240,204) and a population density <strong>of</strong> 28.9 per square mile. The<br />
mid-year estimate for 2007 for the district population is 93,200 (29.92% <strong>of</strong> country total estimate<br />
<strong>of</strong> 311,500) and a density <strong>of</strong> 56.1 per sq. mile. The national population density in 2000 and 2007<br />
figures were 28.2 and 35.1 per square mile, respectively.<br />
In 2007, the population <strong>of</strong> the entire district was 93,200 with 45,300 males and 47,900 females.<br />
In discussions which most community leaders, it is reported that there are 18,000 to 22,000<br />
people living in San Pedro in 2008 <strong>of</strong> which approximately 18,000-19,000 are residents. This is<br />
twice the population estimated by the Belize Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics for mid-2007. It was also<br />
noted that there are only 5,600 registered voters, less than one third, <strong>of</strong> this total residents<br />
This district had a growth rate <strong>of</strong> 19.6% over this last inter-census period (1991-2000) while San<br />
Pedro had a growth rate <strong>of</strong> 143.3% over the same period.<br />
In 1960, there were 600 persons living in San Pedro and by 2000, 40 years later, there were<br />
4,500 which represents over a 750% increase. Between 2000 and 2008, there has been a 231%<br />
increase in population, according to the BIS figures and 44.4% according to community leaders.<br />
San Pedro is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing municipality in Belize and this can create problems in the<br />
use <strong>of</strong> the resources <strong>of</strong> the island and its surrounding fragile ecosystems such as the reef, the<br />
mangroves and lagoons on the west side <strong>of</strong> the island.<br />
2-77
Table 2.8 National Population by District, Mid-year Estimates 2007<br />
DISTRICT Area in Sq. MALE FEMALE TOTAL % <strong>of</strong> Population<br />
Miles<br />
Total Density<br />
COROZAL 718 18,150 18,215 36,365 11.6 50.6<br />
ORANGE<br />
WALK<br />
1,790 23,985 23,160 47,145 14.8 26,3<br />
BELIZE 1,663 45,335 47,880 93,215 30.5 56.1<br />
CAYO 2,006 36,340 26,147 36,985 23.6 36.5<br />
STANN<br />
CREEK<br />
986 16,360 15,820 32,180 10.1 32.6<br />
TOLEDO 1704 14,495 14,755 29,250 9.4 17.2<br />
COUNTRY<br />
TOTAL<br />
8,867 154,665 156,815 311,480 35.1<br />
Abstracts <strong>of</strong> Statistics, 2007 (February)<br />
A brief description <strong>of</strong> San Pedro Town follows:<br />
San Pedro Town<br />
San Pedro Town was developed by the clearing <strong>of</strong> mangroves and sand dunes for settlement<br />
establishment by the Mestizos fleeing from Bacalar, Quintana Roo, Mexico in the 1850s during<br />
the Caste War. The higher grounds <strong>of</strong> the island were cleared for subsistence farming in the past<br />
and later for coconut cultivation for copra production. Commercial fishing was vibrant during the<br />
1960s when the Caribeña Fishing Cooperative was the main intermediary to export fish, conch,<br />
lobster and shrimp. Since the mid-1970s, tourism development began and opened the real estate<br />
sector which is flourishing today; there are approximately ten realtors in San Pedro Town today.<br />
It is estimated that only 40% <strong>of</strong> the current population <strong>of</strong> 18,000 to 20,000 are the original San<br />
Pedranos with the remaining 60% being from other districts. The issue <strong>of</strong> the migrant population<br />
integrating into the traditional San Pedro society has been rather smooth, even with an increase<br />
in crime that is now becoming common all over Belize. Those who come for seasonal<br />
employment only have learned to adapt to the rhythm <strong>of</strong> life in the island. Their income levels<br />
determine the type <strong>of</strong> housing they can rent and the schools and health services they can use.<br />
Those who are pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (teachers, nurses, etc.) or skilled labor (mechanics, carpenters,<br />
plumbers, etc) do have a better standard <strong>of</strong> living.<br />
The main economic activities <strong>of</strong> the residents <strong>of</strong> this town are tourism businesses, many services<br />
and lobster fishing by some 25 fishers who also are involved in tourism. Their main concerns<br />
were:<br />
the project’s activity, namely the sediment plume, is too close to Hol Chan and the<br />
activities may “destroy the main attractions ( Hol Chan, Shark Alley and sport fishing) <strong>of</strong><br />
the island; once Hol Chan is destroyed the tourists will not come to San Pedro thus<br />
resulting in total economic loss;<br />
2-78
impact <strong>of</strong> activities to this area <strong>of</strong> flats where most <strong>of</strong> the sports fishing is done by the<br />
tour guides;<br />
the activities will destroy the habitat for the three important species <strong>of</strong> sport fish, namely<br />
bone fish, permit and tarpon;<br />
The sedimentation can affect the juveniles <strong>of</strong> the three main sport fishing species and also<br />
others such as snook, jewfish and cubera snapper;<br />
the noise <strong>of</strong> the project will “scare and chase” the important sport fishing species and will<br />
destroy the sea grass beds in the lagoon and probably even affect corals on the reef;<br />
the resulting sedimentation <strong>of</strong> fine silt can possibly affect spawning aggregation sites,<br />
especially for lobster;<br />
displacement <strong>of</strong> sport fishers from their current tour guiding grounds due to the project<br />
activities thus resulting in loss <strong>of</strong> their traditional livelihood;<br />
the project may cause restriction <strong>of</strong> traffic to fishers; a buffer area may be “buoyed <strong>of</strong>f” to<br />
prevent fishers and tour guides from using the areas close to the corridor;<br />
the increased boat traffic during installation phase will create bilge pollution;<br />
While the stakeholders made it clear that they are not against the project, they want to see that all<br />
protocols (permits and other GOB requirements) are followed. They also want this type <strong>of</strong><br />
development to follow the Coastal Zone Development Guidelines that were developed by the<br />
Coastal Zone Management Authority and Institute during operation.<br />
2.3.5 Social Infrastructure and Services<br />
2.3.5.1 Labor and Employment<br />
The Belize District and especially San Pedro is highly dependent on several activities such as:<br />
tourism, small farm agriculture, manufacturing and services, and some fishing. Tourism visitors<br />
to the Belize District and San Pedro are attracted for its cayes, the Belize Barrier Reef close to<br />
San Pedro and Caye Caulker, Altun Ha archaeological site and its world re-knowned Blue Hole.<br />
National employment rate in 2005 was 89.0% and in 2007 it was 91.5%. In the Belize District,<br />
the comparative employment figures were 88% % in 2005 and 91 % in 2007. Male employment<br />
for the 2005-2007 accounts for four points less than that <strong>of</strong> females during the same period. The<br />
unemployed rate for women was higher than that <strong>of</strong> males in 2005-2006 but was reversed in<br />
2007 with only 48.2% <strong>of</strong> women unemployed. The proposed development will contribute to the<br />
development <strong>of</strong> the tourism industry in the district and the country in general.<br />
2-79
There may be the need to give on-the-job training to some <strong>of</strong> these unskilled job seekers while it<br />
is also expected that skilled workers would come from outside <strong>of</strong> the country to fill in the jobs<br />
that require skilled expertise related to the project.<br />
In 2007, employment in the Belize District by these industries in 2007 is as follows:<br />
Table 2.10 Employment Data in the Belize District during 2005-2007<br />
Employment Situation Total Male % Female %<br />
Employed- 2005<br />
Employed- 2006<br />
Employed- 2007<br />
Unemployed-2005<br />
Unemployed- 2006<br />
Unemployed- 2007<br />
Source: Labour Force Survey by BIS in 2007<br />
58,996<br />
61,891<br />
65,001<br />
4,387<br />
3,099<br />
3,729<br />
2.3.5.2 Communication and Cable TV Services<br />
2-80<br />
27,651<br />
29,711<br />
31,666<br />
1,832<br />
1,275<br />
1,930<br />
46.9<br />
48.0<br />
48.7<br />
41.8<br />
41.2<br />
51.8<br />
31,344<br />
32,180<br />
33,335<br />
2,555<br />
1,824<br />
1,799<br />
53.1<br />
5<strong>2.0</strong><br />
51.3<br />
58.2<br />
58.8<br />
48.2<br />
Communication and services are well established in the area with public and private telephones,<br />
fixed and mobile cellular phones, fax and email, and internet facilities. However, the goal <strong>of</strong> the<br />
project is to provide faster, real-time and more reliable 24-hour communication services. San<br />
Pedro has only one cable television provider, Coral Cable Vision, and they seem amenable to the<br />
idea <strong>of</strong> utilizing the services <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />
2.3.5.3 Transportation Routes and Options<br />
The project corridor and surroundings can be reached by boat or road. The traditional sea routes<br />
used to transport mainly cargo to and from San Pedro are close to the project corridor. The routes<br />
for the transportation <strong>of</strong> cargo to and from the island are already set by the traditional cargo<br />
shipping agents or businesses. It should be noted that this is the same route used by the sugar<br />
barges coming from Tower Hill through the New River and the Corozal Bay. Safety issues need<br />
to be put in place to prevent accidents on this route.<br />
2.3.6 Economic Activities in the Area<br />
The following economic activities are currently being undertaken on the island.<br />
2.3.6.1 Tourism Activities<br />
In 2007, <strong>of</strong> the ten destinations identified by the BTB, the Belize District placed first in number<br />
<strong>of</strong> hotels and rooms, in number <strong>of</strong> beds, in number <strong>of</strong> tour operators and in number <strong>of</strong> tour<br />
guides. Comparing 2005 and 2007 tourism statistics between the San Pedro and Maskall/Bomba<br />
destination and the rest <strong>of</strong> country, San Pedro as well as Belize rural North has grown at very<br />
high rates in the tourism industry. The numbers <strong>of</strong> hotels, rooms and tour guides have had a
slightly higher growth rate than the national figures. There was a decrease in the number <strong>of</strong> tour<br />
operators and a slight increase in the number <strong>of</strong> tour guides.<br />
The number <strong>of</strong> employees in the hotel sub-sector has increased by 25% while the national figures<br />
have decreased by 15% between those years. While these figures are good indicators for the level<br />
<strong>of</strong> investment, the BTB does not have segregated visitation figures for each <strong>of</strong> the ten<br />
destinations being monitored in order to determine market share. During the period compared,<br />
there has been an increase <strong>of</strong> 8% contribution to GDP and a 6% increase in overnight visitors<br />
while the country experienced a 22% decrease in cruise visitors.<br />
2.3.6.2 Fishing Activities<br />
The fishing activity in San Pedro and surrounding areas has been drastically reduced in volume<br />
and value since the 1970’s when there were approximately 136 fishers and members <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Caribeña Fishermen Cooperative Society and who were mostly engaged in lobster, conch,<br />
shrimp and scale fish. Today there are only 15-20 members who are solely involved in lobster<br />
fishing. Today over 90% percent <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the fishing cooperative are involved totally<br />
in the tourism sector as tour guides, specifically in the sport fishing sub-sector. Even some <strong>of</strong> the<br />
older fishers are being trained this year to do sports fishing.<br />
The total catch in 2007 was between 15-20,000 lbs <strong>of</strong> tail which were sold to the National<br />
Fishing Cooperative Society in Belize City for processing and export. The local tourism market<br />
also buys tails from the individual fishers and the Cooperative outlet for their daily consumption.<br />
The lobster is caught with traps and shade devices while the conch is caught with hooks. The<br />
project corridor and nearby surrounding areas are not a major fishery site, but may be affected by<br />
the project activities. In the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the proposed development, it was reported that there were<br />
only four older fishers, not engaged in the tourism sector, who are still involved in trapping scale<br />
fish for home use and the local market.<br />
As mentioned earlier, the area in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the proposed development are the Bulkhead<br />
Shoals and the flats in the lagoon near the South Beach area which are sport fishing grounds for<br />
bone fish, permit and tarpon. There are approximately 125 tour guides involved in sports fishing.<br />
Again the guides mention that the sedimentation <strong>of</strong> the project can possibly affect the sea grass<br />
beds and will “chase these fish”. These guides are represented by the San Pedro branch <strong>of</strong> the<br />
National Tour Guide Association.<br />
2.4 Legal Environment<br />
Current national environmental policies are based on the need to take an integrated approach to<br />
environmental management and the need to work towards the goal <strong>of</strong> sustainable development.<br />
The Government <strong>of</strong> Belize through the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Environment, Coastal Zone Management<br />
Authority and Institute (now defunct), the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Fisheries, and the other government<br />
institutions are the regulatory bodies <strong>of</strong> the various instruments.<br />
2-81
2.4.1 Policy Review<br />
Current national environmental policies are based on the need to take an integrated approach to<br />
environmental management and the need to work towards the goal <strong>of</strong> sustainable development.<br />
The Government <strong>of</strong> Belize through the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment, Coastal Zone<br />
Management Authority and Institute, the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Fisheries, Forestry <strong>Department</strong> and the<br />
other government institutions are the regulatory bodies <strong>of</strong> the various instruments.<br />
Of importance to the proposed development is the need to identify those regulations and<br />
legislations which will need compliance for development activities in respect to the area and<br />
region <strong>of</strong> the proposed development. In light <strong>of</strong> the fact that the area and region <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />
development is within an area <strong>of</strong> significant importance in terms <strong>of</strong> its tourism and ecological<br />
importance and proposed planning regime, it is also important that development activities strike<br />
a balance between development and the environment.<br />
This section is aimed at reviewing relevant environmental resource and planning legislations and<br />
regulations to ensure that the “development project” meets policy and legislative criteria, and<br />
that relevant requirements are built into project design and implementation. The policy review<br />
also outlines specific procedures and measures to be carried out before, during and after project<br />
development. It is important to note that the anticipated development site borders the Hol Chan<br />
Marine Reserve. Specific conservation zones have been established for all user activities within<br />
the marine reserve.<br />
2.4.1.1 The Environmental Protection Act SI 22/1992 and 328/2003<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>ENVIRONMENT</strong>AL PROTECTION ACT established the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment. Under<br />
section 3 (3) the <strong>Department</strong> has the responsibility to monitor the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act and<br />
Regulations, and to take necessary actions to enforce the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act and Regulations.<br />
This enabling legislation provides the Government and the <strong>Department</strong> with the comprehensive<br />
environmental protection authority it needs in order to address modern environmental pollution<br />
problems. The ACT also grants the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Environment broad regulatory and<br />
enforcement authority for the prevention and control <strong>of</strong> environmental pollution, conservation<br />
and management <strong>of</strong> natural resources, and environmental impact assessment (EIA).<br />
The Environmental Protection Act entrusted the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment with a broad<br />
range <strong>of</strong> functions relating, but not limited to, the assessment <strong>of</strong> water pollution, the coordination<br />
<strong>of</strong> activities relating to the discharge <strong>of</strong> wastes, the licensing <strong>of</strong> activities that may cause water<br />
pollution, the registration <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> pollution and the carrying out <strong>of</strong> research and<br />
investigations as to the causes, nature and extent <strong>of</strong> water pollution, and the necessary prevention<br />
and control measures (section 5). The <strong>Department</strong> is also empowered to approve EIAs.<br />
Under the revised edition 2000 Part III 7 (1) it states that: (d) specifying the standards in excess<br />
<strong>of</strong> which pollutants discharged into the environment shall not be discharged or emitted; (e)<br />
formulating environmental codes <strong>of</strong> practices specifying procedures, practices or releases limits<br />
for environmental control relating to works, undertakings and activities during any phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />
development and operation, including the location, design, construction, start-up, closure,<br />
2-82
dismantling and clean-up phases and any subsequent monitoring activities and (f) environmental<br />
quality guidelines specifying recommendations in quantitative or qualitative terms to support and<br />
maintain particular uses <strong>of</strong> the environment and (j) the control <strong>of</strong> noise.<br />
Under the Act, no person, installation, factory or plant shall, unless specifically permitted by the<br />
<strong>Department</strong>, emit, deposit or discharge or cause emission <strong>of</strong> any pollutant or contaminant into<br />
the atmosphere or environment in contravention <strong>of</strong> the permitted levels. Every person,<br />
installation, factory or plant emitting air pollutants is required to maintain and submit to the<br />
<strong>Department</strong>, records <strong>of</strong> the type, composition and quantity <strong>of</strong> pollutants emitted.<br />
Schedule II (Regulation 8) <strong>of</strong> the 2003 revised edition specifies projects which may require an<br />
environmental impact assessment or environmental impact study depending on the location and<br />
size <strong>of</strong> the project. These include but are not limited to coastal land reclamation involving an<br />
area <strong>of</strong> more than 10 acres; resort and recreational development in terms <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong><br />
coastal resort facilities or hotels and development <strong>of</strong> tourist or recreational facilities on small<br />
islands; and infrastructure projects such as yacht marinas.<br />
No person shall cause or permit the extracting, crushing, screening, handling or conveyance <strong>of</strong><br />
materials or other operations likely to give rise to airborne dust without taking reasonable<br />
precautions, by means <strong>of</strong> spray bars or wetting agents, to prevent particulate matter form<br />
becoming airborne.<br />
Furthermore any person or undertaking exploiting the land, water resources, seas or other natural<br />
resources shall ensure the protection <strong>of</strong> the environment against unnecessary damage or from<br />
pollution by harmful substances; and no person shall emit, import, discharge, deposit, dispose <strong>of</strong><br />
or dump any waste that might directly or indirectly pollute water resources or damage or destroy<br />
marine life.<br />
2.4.1.2 Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations SI 107/1995 and 25/2007<br />
The Environmental Impact Assessment (1995) regulations describe in detail the processes<br />
involved in the preparation and evaluation <strong>of</strong> environmental impact assessments. The<br />
regulations divide projects or activities into three categories. The first category consists <strong>of</strong> those<br />
projects that automatically require an environmental assessment based on the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
surroundings or the nature <strong>of</strong> the undertaking.<br />
The second category comprises those projects that may require an assessment to be carried out,<br />
but with some modifications based on the location and size <strong>of</strong> a project. The third category<br />
encompasses activities or programs that do not require an assessment to be conducted and which<br />
may not have significant impacts on the environment. In March <strong>of</strong> 2007, amendments to the<br />
regulations were published in which by each category or schedule would carry an application and<br />
processing fee. In addition, an environmental clearance (schedule III) fee was also instituted<br />
which should generate considerable income for the <strong>Department</strong>.<br />
The Environmental Impact Assessment Part V - 20 (4) stat es that every project, program or<br />
activity shall be assessed with a view to the need to protect and improve human health and living<br />
2-83
conditions and the need to preserve the reproductive capacity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems as well as the<br />
diversity <strong>of</strong> species. Under 20 (5) when making an environmental impact assessment, a proposed<br />
developer shall consult with public and other interested bodies or organizations and under 20 (7)<br />
a decision by the DOE to approve an environmental impact assessment may be subjected to<br />
conditions which are reasonably required for environmental purposes.<br />
2.4.1.3 Effluent Limitation Regulations SI 94/1995<br />
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>ENVIRONMENT</strong>AL PROTECTION EFFLUENT LIMITATION REGULATIONS came into force in<br />
1996, at which time the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment commenced enforcing the Regulations.<br />
The Regulations are intended to control and monitor discharges <strong>of</strong> effluent into any inland waters<br />
or the marine environment <strong>of</strong> Belize.<br />
2.4.1 .4Pollution Regulations SI 56/1996<br />
The Pollution Regulations <strong>of</strong> 1996 addresses issues <strong>of</strong> air, water and soil pollution, including<br />
noise pollution. Part III – 6 (1) deals generally with the emission <strong>of</strong> contaminants into the air<br />
where no person shall cause, allow or permit contaminants to be emitted or discharged either<br />
directly or indirectly into the air from any source.<br />
Part X 31 (c & d) deals with pollution <strong>of</strong> land generally that could be harmful, or potentially<br />
harmful to animals, birds, wildlife, plants or vegetation. The <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Environment is<br />
responsible for the enforcement <strong>of</strong> the Pollution Regulations Act.<br />
2.4.2 Coastal Zone Management Strategy Chap. 329 2000 Revised Edition<br />
The Coastal Zone Management was legally established in 1998 with the passage <strong>of</strong> the Coastal<br />
Zone Management Authority Act (Act # 5 <strong>of</strong> 1998). Under section 5 (1), the main functions <strong>of</strong><br />
the Authority include (i) to advise Government on matters related to development and use <strong>of</strong><br />
resources in the coastal zone in an orderly and sustainable manner; (ii) formulation <strong>of</strong> policies on<br />
coastal zone management; (iii) development <strong>of</strong> a coastal zone management plan and revise it as<br />
needed; (iv) commission monitoring and research <strong>of</strong> coastal areas (v) promote public awareness;<br />
and (vi) prepare guidelines for developers.<br />
The Coastal Zone Management Strategy seeks to facilitate improved management <strong>of</strong> coastal<br />
resources, and to ensure economic growth is balanced with sound environmental management<br />
practices. The Strategy seeks to review and ‘enhance existing laws, regulations, ‘policies’ and<br />
guidelines relating to conservation, resource management and development controls in the<br />
coastal zone area.’<br />
These support a coastal area management framework that addresses the need for management<br />
approaches in location between, as well as within, Coastal and Marine Protected Areas, and<br />
special requirements for management development and conservation in the barrier reef region,<br />
particularly the cayes.<br />
2-84
2.4.3 Cayes Development Policy – CZMIA/Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> 1995<br />
The Cayes Development Policy has served to consolidate existing legislations, and to promulgate<br />
regulations and guidelines applicable to the development and sustainable management <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
cayes within the coastal zone <strong>of</strong> Belize. The Policy calls for a detailed planning system to control<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> land, and water development to cover the entire coastal zone. The policy also<br />
demarcates/recommends zones and a system <strong>of</strong> assigning development codes for the cayes.<br />
The main thrust <strong>of</strong> the document is to articulate the type <strong>of</strong> actions and initiatives that must be<br />
undertaken by all the various stakeholders in order to ensure sustainable use and long-term<br />
protection <strong>of</strong> natural and cultural resources and development within the coastal planning regions.<br />
The policy addresses such areas as caye ownership, protected areas management, land use<br />
planning and development control, extraction <strong>of</strong> materials, infrastructure and transport, shipping<br />
and the use <strong>of</strong> marine vessels, waste disposal and fuel storage, fiscal incentives to encourage<br />
responsible practices and incorporation <strong>of</strong> actions within the national strategic planning<br />
framework.<br />
2.4.4 Solid Waste Management Authority Act SI 224 <strong>of</strong> 2003<br />
Under the Act, the Authority shall devise ways and means for the efficient collection and<br />
disposal <strong>of</strong> solid waste employing modern methods and techniques and exploring the possibility<br />
<strong>of</strong> recycling waste materials. Under the Act “construction waste material” includes building<br />
materials from construction, alteration and remodeling building or structure <strong>of</strong> any kind, such as<br />
lumber, concrete, steel ro<strong>of</strong>ing, etc. SI 13/1991 established the Solid Waste Management<br />
Authority and gave it broad powers for the collection and disposal <strong>of</strong> solid waste.<br />
2.4.5 National Institute <strong>of</strong> Culture and History 330/2000<br />
Under section (4) <strong>of</strong> the Ancient Monuments and Antiquities Act, all ancient monuments and<br />
antiquities however situate, whether upon any land or in any river, stream or watercourse, or<br />
under territorial waters <strong>of</strong> the country, and whether or not before the date <strong>of</strong> the commencement<br />
<strong>of</strong> this Act in private ownership, possession, custody or control, shall absolutely vest in the<br />
Government. Under section (12), if any person finds any ancient monument or antiquity he shall<br />
within fourteen days <strong>of</strong> such findings report the details <strong>of</strong> the findings to the Minister.<br />
2.4.6 Belize Water Industry Act No. 1 <strong>of</strong> 2001<br />
The Water Industry Act repeals the Water and Sewerage Act, Chapter 185 <strong>of</strong> 1971 Laws <strong>of</strong><br />
Belize. Chapter one <strong>of</strong> the Act deals with controlling disposal <strong>of</strong> wastes generated from sewer<br />
treatment. The Act makes new provisions with respect to the supply and control <strong>of</strong> water and<br />
sewerage services in Belize.<br />
The Water Industry Act also establishes the responsibility <strong>of</strong> private entities to provide facilities<br />
for the final disposal <strong>of</strong> sewerage taking into consideration Chapter 36 <strong>of</strong> the Environmental<br />
Protection Act 1 <strong>of</strong> 2001.<br />
2-85
2.4.7 Belize Public Health Act Revised Edition SI 40/2000<br />
Under Part VIII <strong>of</strong> Offensive Trades 128 (1) b the Minister can make regulations relating to<br />
nuisances for the prevention, control or reduction <strong>of</strong> pollution or contamination <strong>of</strong> air, soil or<br />
water caused by any activity or condition resulting in the emission <strong>of</strong> a pollutant or contaminant<br />
into the environment. The Act also specifies restrictions and regulations for nuisances from<br />
factories or other industrial developments, and incidental provisions relating to <strong>of</strong>fensive<br />
businesses.<br />
2.4.8 National Lands Act (No. 6 <strong>of</strong> 1992) and SI 191 <strong>of</strong> 2000<br />
The Act is designed to establish a framework for the management <strong>of</strong> national lands. The Act<br />
applies to all lands (other than Reserved Forest) not already "located" or granted, including any<br />
lands acquired by or ceded to the Crown. They are classified as town, suburban, rural, mineral<br />
lands and beach lands.<br />
In Section 28, where the sea, or any sound, bay or creek is described as forming part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
boundary <strong>of</strong> any national land to be granted or disposed <strong>of</strong>, then high water mark shall be<br />
considered to be the property boundary. Under the Act, the seabed defined as the land extending<br />
seawards from the high water mark <strong>of</strong> ordinary tides, is National Land owned by the<br />
Government <strong>of</strong> Belize under the authority <strong>of</strong> the National Lands Act.<br />
2.4.9 Crown Land Rules SI 60 <strong>of</strong> 1939<br />
Under Crown Land Rules (Statutory Rules and Orders 66 <strong>of</strong> 1939), a 66 ft wide strip <strong>of</strong> land<br />
along all water frontages, measured from high water mark, is designated as public easement, but<br />
lands titles prior to 1930 included the land to the high water mark and in some cases, below the<br />
high water mark.<br />
2.4.10 Mines and Minerals Act Chap. 226 <strong>of</strong> 2000<br />
The Mines and Minerals (General) Regulations provide a general framework for the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the Mines and Minerals Act. These Regulations cover a range <strong>of</strong> topics such<br />
as application, duties, terms and conditions and failure to comply with the conditions <strong>of</strong> a mining<br />
license. Under the Act “land” includes land beneath water. The Act also addresses dredging<br />
and sand mining, which is essential in avoiding destruction to coastal habitats such as seagrass<br />
beds and the coral reef.<br />
2.4.11 Forests (Mangrove Protection) Regulations, SI No. 52 <strong>of</strong> 1989<br />
The Forests (Protection <strong>of</strong> Mangrove) Regulations, 1989, prohibit any "alteration” (which<br />
includes cutting and defoliating, but does not include "selective trimming") <strong>of</strong> mangroves on any<br />
land except with a permit (R eg. 4). Alterations which involve dredging or filling can be<br />
authorized only in "exceptional circumstances."<br />
2-86
Factors considered for issuing or denying permits include the proximity <strong>of</strong> the proposed project<br />
to coastal and reef areas known to be <strong>of</strong> outstandingly high ecological value (Reg. 5(2) (i)), and<br />
the existing or proposed plans such as the barrier reef regional management and development<br />
plan. The Mangrove Regulations were amended in 1992 to increase the level <strong>of</strong> fines and<br />
sanctions.<br />
2.4.12 The Forest Act SI 213/2000<br />
The protection <strong>of</strong> all mangroves fall under this Act via the Forest (Protection <strong>of</strong> Mangrove)<br />
Regulations. Mangrove clearance may be permitted under this Act. In most cases a permit to<br />
clear mangroves is issued after a multi-agency assessment is conducted. This Act includes the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> Forest Reserves which may include mangroves, littoral forests and water<br />
bodies. However, no specific regulations exist under this Act that address littoral forests. The<br />
Forest Act is currently being revised.<br />
The legislative basis for conservation <strong>of</strong> national lands is defined by the Forest and Wildlife<br />
Conservation Acts. The Forest Act provides for the protection and conservation <strong>of</strong> all mangrove<br />
forests on both private and national lands, any alterations to which require evaluation and permit<br />
by the Forestry <strong>Department</strong>.<br />
2.4.13 Fisheries Act (HCMR) Chap. 210s/2003<br />
The protection <strong>of</strong> the Hol Chan Marine Reserve falls under this act. The Hol Chan Marine<br />
Reserve encompasses a small area but includes all major ecological zones <strong>of</strong> Belize's coastal<br />
ecosystems. This SI introduces the zonation <strong>of</strong> the marine reserve into four distinct areas namely<br />
zones A, B, C and D. Each zone is tasked with having their particular practice, restriction and<br />
rules. Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the Reserve, the Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> is the Governmental agency<br />
responsible for all Marine Reserves, but due to the fact that the reserve has a trust fund, there is a<br />
Board <strong>of</strong> Directors that manage the finances <strong>of</strong> the reserve, while the staff, under the directives<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> is responsible for the day to day activities <strong>of</strong> the reserve and its<br />
operations at sea.<br />
2.4.14 Ambergris Caye Local Building Authority<br />
This ‘body’ has been given the task to oversee, monitor and regulate the civil engineering,<br />
architectural, coastal and land management activities for any proposed development on<br />
Ambergris Caye. These principles are embodied in recommended “Guidelines for the<br />
Development <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye” – a study which was originally produced around 1993 and<br />
continues to be reviewed. These guidelines along with good Engineering and Architectural<br />
practices are the backbone <strong>of</strong> the requirements for our development projects.<br />
Developers are therefore required to obtain legal permission for their projects prior to<br />
implementation through submitting plans to the Local Building Authority. An Impact Fee is<br />
charged for the purpose <strong>of</strong> mitigating what minimal impacts cannot reasonably be avoided from<br />
the developers projects, as well as for institutional management; and penalties as well as other<br />
legal means are in place to regulate these development activities To this end a recent review <strong>of</strong><br />
2-87
the Impact Fee Schedule (Permit Fees) is being published for information and comments <strong>of</strong> the<br />
building/engineering industry in Ambergris Caye.<br />
2.4.15 International Conventions and Agreements<br />
Belize is signatory or party to many international conventions and agreements, and is a member<br />
<strong>of</strong> many regional organizations involved in the management and protection <strong>of</strong> biological<br />
resources.<br />
(a) United Nations Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea Convention (LOSC) (ratified 13 August, 1983).<br />
(b) World Heritage Convention (ratified in 1990).<br />
(c) Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Wild Fauna and Flora<br />
(CITES) (ratified 1976).<br />
(d) Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (ratified in December, 1993).<br />
(e) Central American Biodiversity Convention.<br />
(f) Convention for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity and the Protection <strong>of</strong> Priority Areas in<br />
Central America.<br />
(g) Agreement on Cooperation between Belize and Mexico for the Protection and the<br />
Improvement <strong>of</strong> the Environment and the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources in the Border Zone<br />
(signed 20 September, 1991).<br />
(h) Protocol on Specially Protected Wildlife (SPAW Protocol)<br />
(I) Land-Based Sources <strong>of</strong> Pollution Protocol (LBSP).<br />
(j) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (ratified September, 1994).<br />
(k) Convention for the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Pollution from Ships (MARPOL 73/78) (ratified 12 May,<br />
1995).<br />
(l) International Convention for the Regulation <strong>of</strong> Whaling (signed 1982).<br />
(m) Agreement for the Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Provisions <strong>of</strong> the United Nations Convention on<br />
the Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea <strong>of</strong> 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management <strong>of</strong> Straddling Fish<br />
Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (signed 1995).<br />
(n) Convention on the Prohibition <strong>of</strong> the Development, Production and Stockpiling <strong>of</strong><br />
Bacteriological (Biological) Toxins and their Destruction (signed 1980).<br />
(o) Western Central Atlantic Fisheries Commission (WECAFC) (1985).<br />
(p) Latin American Organization for Fisheries Development (OLDEPESCA) (1997).<br />
(q) Convention for the Protection and Development <strong>of</strong> the Marine Environment <strong>of</strong> the Wider<br />
Caribbean Region (The Cartagena Convention).<br />
(r) The Convention on Wetlands <strong>of</strong> International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitats<br />
(RAMSAR) (Signed 1971).<br />
(s) International Dolphin Conservation Program (IDCP).<br />
(t) International Commission for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)<br />
(u) Inter-American Convention for the Conservation and Protection <strong>of</strong> Marine Turtles<br />
2-88