09.04.2013 Views

CHAPTER 2 2.0 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT - Department of ...

CHAPTER 2 2.0 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT - Department of ...

CHAPTER 2 2.0 THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 2<br />

<strong>2.0</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>PHYSICAL</strong> <strong>ENVIRONMENT</strong><br />

2.1 Physical Environment<br />

This aspect <strong>of</strong> the document covers the biological environment, both marine and terrestrial; the<br />

physico-chemical environment, vis-à-vis issues <strong>of</strong> sea-bed conditions and water quality; the<br />

physical environment including issues <strong>of</strong> topographic, hydrographic and socio-cultural issues.<br />

2.1.1 Climatology<br />

Belize lies in the tropical to sub tropical belt with a pronounced wet and dry season even though<br />

there are significant variations in the weather patterns in the region. Mean annual temperatures<br />

range from 16-17°C in winter to 24-25°C in summer, in the South; and from 23-26°C in winter<br />

to 28-31°C in summer, in the North [See Fig. 2.6]. Mean annual precipitation fluctuates between<br />

1500mm to the north and 4000mm to the South. A dry season characterized by strong easterly<br />

winds, runs from January to February and May to June. Strong winter storms blow from October<br />

to February, <strong>of</strong>ten as 'northers' which bring cool temperatures, heavy rains, strong winds and<br />

rough seas. In the summer there are occasional strong squalls with winds up to 48kph. The<br />

hurricane season runs from June to November but peaks between August to October in Belize.<br />

Ambergris Caye, which is located in the subtropical moist ecological life zone <strong>of</strong> Belize, is the<br />

driest region <strong>of</strong> the country getting < 60” <strong>of</strong> rainfall per annum [See Fig. 2.1 & 2.6]. The caye<br />

has a bimodal rainfall pattern with the main dry season extending from December to May and a<br />

wet season from June to November, with the highest concentration <strong>of</strong> rainfall from September to<br />

November.<br />

This somewhat arbitrary division <strong>of</strong> the rainfall pattern is usually interrupted in August when<br />

there is normally a short dry spell. The evaporation rate is contingent on the seasonal patterns <strong>of</strong><br />

rainfall and humidity throughout the project corridor [See Fig 2.5c]. In the rainy season when<br />

there is high humidity, the evaporation rates are lower (about 80 mm. per month) to the dry<br />

season when they are significantly higher due to the lower humidity index <strong>of</strong> the atmosphere<br />

(approx. 160 mm. per month).<br />

Temperatures at Ambergris Caye show a slight seasonal variation with normal temperatures<br />

varying between 21.0º C and 3<strong>2.0</strong>º C. There is a more noticeable temperature difference between<br />

night time and daytime temperatures than between seasonal norms. At coastal locations,<br />

temperature differences are moderated by the warm <strong>of</strong>fshore waters. Nevertheless seasonal<br />

extremes can fall between 13.75º C and 35.75ºC. Temperature differences are <strong>of</strong>ten accompanied<br />

by a change in wind direction, with the predominant winds coming from the east and southeast in<br />

the warmer months but sometimes shifting to the north and northeast in the cooler season.<br />

2-1


Fig. 2.1: Belize Mean Annual Isoplets.<br />

2.1.2 Oceanography<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> the physical environment, the following oceanographic components are summarized<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> the receiving environment for the proposed btl FOC project. These components are<br />

directly related to the constant physical outline <strong>of</strong> the coastal areas <strong>of</strong> the aforementioned project.<br />

2.1.2.1 Regional Hydrographic Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

Based on the hydrographic provinces (Purdy, 1966), the Ambergris Caye rests on the Barrier<br />

Platform. This is relevant to continental shelf in which the project site is located on the outer<br />

most ridges or shoal <strong>of</strong> such shelf. The area <strong>of</strong> the Continental Shelf running from the back-reef<br />

<strong>of</strong> the main barrier reef to the eastern shore line <strong>of</strong> cayes has been referred to by Purdy (1975) as<br />

the Barrier Lagoon.<br />

The waters between this first line <strong>of</strong> cayes, including Ambergris Caye, and the mainland have<br />

been referred to by Purdy (1975) as the Shelf lagoon. Purdy has sub -divided these Lagoonal<br />

2-2


systems on the basis <strong>of</strong> a Northern Shelf Lagoon and a Southern Shelf lagoon – the dividing<br />

point being at the Belize river delta in Belize City. The Northern shelf Lagoon running from<br />

Belize City to San Pedro and including the Chetumal Bay is relatively shallow with depths not<br />

exceeding three (3) fathoms.<br />

The Northern Shelf lagoon is shallow and flat, being interrupted by relict drainage channel and<br />

sinkholes caused by Pleistocene erosion (Purdy 1974; Scott 1966). One <strong>of</strong> these channels the<br />

English Caye or Eastern Channel, makes a deep undulating cut <strong>of</strong> about 30 meters in depth<br />

through the Barrier platform. This Channel probably represents an old streambed <strong>of</strong> either the<br />

Belize River or Sibun River. Other noted drainage channels in the reef includes – the Saint<br />

George’s Caye Channel and the Caye Caulker–Caye Chapel channel.<br />

2.1.2.2 Bathymetry<br />

There has been published data on the depth pr<strong>of</strong>ile and bathymetry <strong>of</strong> the proposed project area,<br />

which was done for the BEL Power II Project. The Tunich Nah Survey Team in its April and<br />

May site surveys did some limited work in this area. This survey was undertaken mainly to<br />

provide information in regards to the route <strong>of</strong> the FOC [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4] and to verify<br />

that the data collected for the BEL Power II project is still valid and could be utilized for this<br />

project.<br />

The oceanic bathymetry <strong>of</strong> the near shore environment near Ambergris Caye along the project<br />

corridor site is best described as a shallow lagoonal shelf (See Fig. 2.3 & 2.4). This description is<br />

not applicable for the southwestern portion <strong>of</strong> the general marine area that comprises the Boca<br />

Chica Canal (Hol Chan Marine Reserve boundary) which has depths <strong>of</strong> ten feet and with strong<br />

oceanic currents.<br />

2-3


Fig 2.2 Depth Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> project area for Stage 2 Phase 1<br />

2-4


Fig 2.3: Depth Pr<strong>of</strong>ile for Stage 2 Phase 2a<br />

2-5


Fig 2.4: Depth Pr<strong>of</strong>ile for Stage 2 Phase 2b<br />

2-6


2.1.2.3 Winds and Waves<br />

The coast <strong>of</strong> Belize is subjected to southeasterly trade winds that average 10-18 knots. The<br />

greatest trade winds are experienced in July (Stoddart, 1962). The coastal regions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

country including Ambergris Caye, get the majority <strong>of</strong> the winds. The southeasterly trade<br />

winds are the prevailing winds in the tropics, blowing from the high-pressure area in the<br />

Horse latitudes (Subtropical High) towards the low-pressure area around the equator.<br />

The prevailing winds [See Fig 2.5a] are the main driving force for waves and surface currents<br />

in coastal Belize and by extension the project area, especially eastern portion <strong>of</strong> Ambergris<br />

Caye. During the periods when the southeasterly and easterly winds prevail, maximum wave<br />

energy are developed in the deep seas, which are dissipated at the crest <strong>of</strong> the barrier reef, as<br />

well as over the barrier platform, with the breaking <strong>of</strong> these waves. During these times the<br />

waters surrounding the caye become richly oxygenated – which bodes well for the flora and<br />

fauna in the area.<br />

The coastal lagoon portion <strong>of</strong> the project site is not subjected to the strong wave action and<br />

therefore remains relatively calm throughout the year. This is primarily due to the water<br />

depth and associated bathymetry <strong>of</strong> the area as well as the prevailing winds as mentioned<br />

earlier. The wave action <strong>of</strong> the lagoon area however, is suffice to generate localized erosion<br />

over time as can be seen in several back dated maps <strong>of</strong> the area. This is especially important<br />

when the prevailing winds shifts to the northerlies and the shelf lagoon’s current intensifies.<br />

Further outwards, the wave action intensifies as the waters become more exposed to the<br />

winds and head towards mainland. This dynamic process is a continuous cycle that is<br />

dependent on the prevailing winds, its direction and the wave energy generated by the current<br />

influxes.<br />

The general wind pattern for the proposed project site is that <strong>of</strong> a east-southeasterly wind<br />

during the dry season, easterly winds in the rainy season and occasional northerly winds<br />

during the cooler months (October to February [See Fig. 2.5b]). In the period March-June the<br />

average wind speed is highest but the average wind-speed inland is considerable lower than<br />

along coastal areas.<br />

Fig. 2.5a: Wind Direction<br />

2-7


KNOTS<br />

%<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

84<br />

82<br />

80<br />

78<br />

76<br />

74<br />

32<br />

GUSTINESS<br />

PHILIP GOLDSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT (1962 -1996)<br />

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY 35 JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC<br />

Fig. 2.5 b: Annual Wind Speed and Gusts-PGIA<br />

Relative Humidity & Bright Sunshine<br />

Philip Goldson International Airport<br />

77<br />

9<br />

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec<br />

2-8<br />

32<br />

83<br />

Relative Humidity Bright Sunshine<br />

Fig. 2.5c: Relative Humidity and Sunshine.<br />

2.1.2.4 Tides<br />

10<br />

8<br />

Hours<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0


The world's oceans are in constant flux. Winds and currents move the surface water causing<br />

waves. Ocean levels fluctuate daily as the sun, moon and earth interact. As the moon travels<br />

around the earth and as they, together, travel around the sun, the combined gravitational<br />

forces cause the world's oceans to rise and fall. Tides vary from day to day. As the earth,<br />

moon, and sun orbit, their positions constantly shift, causing slightly different gravitational<br />

effects. This causes the tides to occur at slightly different times. Tides also vary from place to<br />

place. Geographical position determines the level <strong>of</strong> tide.<br />

Belize experiences semi-diurnal tides with amplitudes in the order <strong>of</strong> 0.5 M during normal<br />

weather and about 0.8 M in variation during the cold fronts. Another phenomenon affecting<br />

tidal amplitude in Belize and at the project site in general is the “Sun Tides” in October and<br />

March, in any given year. During these times the ‘migration’ <strong>of</strong> the Sun to and from the<br />

southern hemisphere has an additive effect on the tides, which are otherwise primarily<br />

dominated by the gravitational pull <strong>of</strong> the moon.<br />

During these times both the high tides and low tides are higher than ‘normal’. These<br />

variations may be on the order <strong>of</strong> 8 inches to 1 ft. The highest sun tides are experienced<br />

during the full moon and new Moon phases <strong>of</strong> the lunar cycle in which the high tide is<br />

referred to as “Higher High Water Spring Tide” or HHWS. During these times the low tide is<br />

referred to as “Higher Low Water Spring Tide” or HLWS. During the lower tidal cycle,<br />

which occurs during the 1 st Quarter and 3 rd or Last Quarter phase <strong>of</strong> the lunar cycle, the high<br />

tides are referred to as “Higher High Water Neap Tide” or HHWN: The low tides are<br />

referred “Higher Low Water Neap Tide” <strong>of</strong> HLWN.<br />

The ‘Sun Tides’ can have a severe inundating or ‘flooding’ and erosional effect on low lying<br />

areas. During the times <strong>of</strong> the sun tides and in markedly rough sea states, some <strong>of</strong> the coastal<br />

portion in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the project corridor can become waterlogged and inundated by the<br />

sea. This is especially important were the mangrove swamp land extends from the coastal<br />

areas into the project site. The reduced elevation and gently sloping pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the beach in the<br />

coastal area <strong>of</strong> the project site is a function <strong>of</strong> low tidal amplitude and the reduced energy<br />

efficiency.<br />

2.1.2.5 Current<br />

Ocean waters are constantly on the move. Currents flow in complex patterns affected by<br />

wind, the water’s salinity and heat content, bottom topography, and the earth’s rotation. The<br />

currents influencing the depositional and erosional processes are derived from both winddriven<br />

and tidal sources. The wind driven currents are greater in magnitude and are in general<br />

more influential in affecting the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the coastal ecosystems.<br />

The marine section <strong>of</strong> the project comprises <strong>of</strong> approximately 24 km, thus the current flow<br />

differs from area to area. As can be seen from Fig. 2.7 and Fig. 2.8, the current direction is<br />

constant in the open sea, which is influenced by the prevailing winds which exert a dominant<br />

influence on current directions, resulting in a South to South West movement, except for<br />

points #1 and #4. The current at point 1 is near the coastline, and due to the contour <strong>of</strong> the<br />

coast, the current goes out. In the case <strong>of</strong> point 4, this effect is influenced by the area known<br />

as Bulkhead Shoals that exist to the north <strong>of</strong> the project corridor, thus the under currents tend<br />

to follow the contour <strong>of</strong> the shoal, forcing the current to go in an opposite direction due to the<br />

2-9


<strong>of</strong>f-shoot.<br />

The prevailing winds also result in marine wave action moving predominantly towards the<br />

South Southwest. The pattern then changes the closer we get to San Pedro, this being<br />

influenced by the contour <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye. As can be seen from Fig 2.8, the current flows<br />

to the south southeast which is caused by the influence <strong>of</strong> the emptying tides. In the shallow<br />

San Pedro Lagoon, the currents are also influenced by tides due to the fact that the deepest<br />

area is no more than 2 to 3 feet. Currents in the Lagoon system flow primarily from the<br />

North-Northeast towards a South-South westerly direction.<br />

The prevailing water movement entering the Caribbean is the wind-driven Guiana Current,<br />

flowing from southeast to northwest; this becomes the Caribbean Current, flowing through<br />

the Lesser Antilles with the majority reaching the Yucatan Strait (Hanson & von Twistern,<br />

1996). The current breaks at Rocky Point, northern Belize, to form a small gyre that drives<br />

the sea <strong>of</strong>f Belize to flow from north to south (Perkins, 1983).<br />

While the prevailing current flow moves from north to south, powerful northerly winds<br />

during cold fronts or other storm events may generate temporary strong currents that may<br />

carry materials such as sediments as far as the Mesoamerican Barrier Reef System (MBRS).<br />

These currents do not only affect sediment transport but also the distribution <strong>of</strong> sessile<br />

organisms including grasses and algae. These currents vary seasonally and, though charted in<br />

general, have not been studied in detail (Hanson & von Twistern, 1996).<br />

Wind driven currents in the Belize City areas have been recorded at 1 - 1.5 knots at the<br />

immediate sub-surface depths and 0.2-0.6 knots at a depth <strong>of</strong> 1.8 meters (FAO/UNDP<br />

unpublished report, 1983). For the coastal portion <strong>of</strong> the project corridor, the currents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Laguna de Boca Ciega and Caribbean Sea vary throughout the hydrographic pr<strong>of</strong>ile from<br />

0.36 ft/s to 1.08 ft/s. Float patterns collected as part <strong>of</strong> the overall field data for the Laguna de<br />

Boca Ciega indicate speeds <strong>of</strong> .72 ft/sec or .43 knots around the coastal portion <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

site (Information gotten from South Beach EIA).<br />

2-10


Fig: 2.6 Data for PGIA (Closest site data for project site)<br />

2-11<br />

(Courtesy Met Dept)<br />

Total Rainfall(mm) Avg. Min Temp Avg. Max Temp Relative Humidity(%)<br />

Sunshine<br />

hours<br />

Jan 127.2 69.1 82.6 82 6.9<br />

Feb 113.8 73.0 85.3 78 8.6<br />

Mar 99.9 72.5 84.7 80 8.2<br />

Apr 8.7 74.8 87.3 74 9.7<br />

May 115.1 78.1 89.6 76 9.0<br />

Jun 480.7 77.4 86.9 83 4.1<br />

Jul 119.2 77.5 88.0 80 7.1<br />

Aug 96.3 77.7 89.8 78 8.4<br />

Sep 258.2 77.0 89.6 81 6.4<br />

Oct 558.7 73.9 84.9 86 4.0<br />

Nov 7.5 68.2 84.0 75 8.0<br />

Dec 79.3 69.1 82.6 80 6.2<br />

Table <strong>2.0</strong> Monthly weather data for 2008 at Philip Goldson Airport (Courtesy MET Dept)


Fig 2.7: General Current Flow Pattern and Direction<br />

2-12


Fig: 2.8 Current flow for phase 2a <strong>of</strong> stage 2 <strong>of</strong> the project (Taken from South Beach EIA)<br />

2-13


2.1.2.6 Vulnerability to Tropical Cyclones<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> storm hazard analyses for Belize City can be used to characterize the site’s<br />

vulnerability to tropical cyclones. The average frequency for tropical storms or greater is 3.7<br />

years, for category 1 hurricanes or greater was 12 years. The development site lies in the path <strong>of</strong><br />

most tropical cyclones that threaten Belize. Due to this it is at risk every 20.75 years for a<br />

category 3 or greater storm every 40 years.<br />

During the last 78 years (1931 – 2009) the highest frequency <strong>of</strong> recorded landfalls was near<br />

Corozal and Punta Gorda Towns, while the lowest was near San Pedro and Orange Walk Towns.<br />

At least 3 tropical cyclones made landfall in the general vicinity <strong>of</strong> the development site during<br />

the same period. Cyclones crossing the general area vary in strength and winds were reported as<br />

high as 120 knots [See Fig 2.9].<br />

Tropical storms are the most frequent cyclones that impact the development site. TAOS Model<br />

Simulations 1 for an average strength tropical storm [48 knots sustained winds & NE Quad over<br />

site] impacting this site, indicate that maximum winds <strong>of</strong> 19 m/s and storm surge <strong>of</strong> 1.1 meters<br />

would impact the area. Therefore for the proposed project it will take place during the dry<br />

weather season, which also happens to be the period void <strong>of</strong> tropical storms and hurricanes.<br />

Locatrions <strong>of</strong> Hurricane Landfalls<br />

1<br />

Simulations conducted by The Forecast Office 1953-2004 <strong>of</strong> The National Meteorological Service<br />

Frequency<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

3<br />

5 5<br />

BELIZE CITY COROZAL PUNTA GORDA SANPEDRO STANN CREEK ORANGE WALK<br />

Fig. 2.9: Locations <strong>of</strong> Hurricane Landfalls.<br />

2-14<br />

1<br />

3<br />

1


Maximum winds associated with hurricanes range from 35 m/s for category 1 to 75 m/s for<br />

category 5. The entire corridor site is impacted for these winds. For a category 1 hurricane, the<br />

wind field extends 12 kilometers inland while for a category 5 hurricane it extends 10 kilometers<br />

inland.<br />

Belize lies within the hurricane belt and is <strong>of</strong>ten targeted by significant tropical weather. The<br />

hurricane season lasts from June to November, more or less coinciding with the rainy season.<br />

Hurricanes bring high winds, heavy rains and tidal waves in the case <strong>of</strong> the bigger ones. Because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the risks posed by hurricanes, it is recommended that important structures (at both landing<br />

sites, and the marker buoys) be designed to withstand high wind speeds.<br />

Designing for higher wind speeds depends on the project tolerance for risk or an analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> alternatives such as appropriate insurance coverage. It should be noted that the Caribbean<br />

Uniform Building Code (CUBiC) gives a 50-year return period hurricane wind speed <strong>of</strong> 121 mph<br />

for Belize based on 3-second gust; however it should also be noted that storm activity in the<br />

region has been higher in the past 10 years or so than in the preceding 50 years, and Belize has<br />

experienced 2 storms with wind speeds above 130mph in just the past 5 years.<br />

Sustained periods <strong>of</strong> heavy rains cause flooding during hurricanes and tropical storms. In the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> San Pedro, however, flooding as a result <strong>of</strong> rainfall is unlikely to be a major factor<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the interconnection <strong>of</strong> the internal bodies <strong>of</strong> water with the sea and lagoon, which<br />

means that water levels will always tend to that <strong>of</strong> mean sea level, but is prone to flooding in the<br />

Northern Belize district area. On the other hand, the project area would be highly vulnerable to<br />

inundation from storm surge in the event <strong>of</strong> hurricane for both San Pedro and Northern Belize<br />

District. Because <strong>of</strong> the fairly small geographic extent and the flat topography <strong>of</strong> the area, such<br />

inundation would likely affect the entire Ambergris Caye in a very short period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

2.1.2.7 Water Quality<br />

The physical water quality parameters are the functions which modify and influence the<br />

structural and biological elements <strong>of</strong> the barrier lagoon and by extension the proposed project<br />

corridor site. With this in mind several water samples were collected as part <strong>of</strong> the water quality<br />

assessment and monitoring plans ( See Chapter 6). The analysis were conducted primarily to<br />

determine the physical and chemical characteristics <strong>of</strong> the receiving marine environment and to<br />

formally establish a water quality data base.<br />

In this token, the EIA preparer took 2 sets <strong>of</strong> water samples (See Fig. 2.10). In the first 2 set, 7<br />

water samples were collected and taken to an accredited DoE laboratory for testing. In the last<br />

set <strong>of</strong> water samples 7 samples were collected and analyzed in-situ. The following summarizes<br />

the water quality <strong>of</strong> the project site.<br />

Transparency<br />

The waters coming from the ocean and flushing over the Barrier Platform are clear and largely<br />

free <strong>of</strong> turbid influences. The clarity <strong>of</strong> this deep ocean water is attributable to its nutrient-poor<br />

status and consequently low primary productivity. Cumulative results <strong>of</strong> the turbidity, suspended<br />

2-15


solids and total dissolved solids reading indicate that the Laguna de Boca Ciega along with the<br />

portions <strong>of</strong> the Hol Chan Marine Reserve that are close to the project corridor are satisfactory.<br />

Turbidity readings for the project site were very low indicating crystalline and transparent<br />

conditions<br />

The Suspended Solids and Total Dissolved Solids values for the different in-situ and analyzed<br />

sites showed a similar pattern and in fact are directly correlated to the turbidity readings. Both<br />

these parameters were very low and indicative <strong>of</strong> crystalline waters with very fine suspended<br />

solids and silt content. There was little variation between the sampling points for both parameters<br />

which could implicate that there was little deviation from the normal concentrations.<br />

Transparency is an important component in recreational waters and as such is the first visible<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> anthropogenic pollution. The relative low ranges for these three parameters,<br />

especially for the leeward side <strong>of</strong> the project site, can be attributed to the calmer sea states (wave<br />

action and energy) and ocean currents within the entire project area.<br />

Nutrients<br />

The nutrient levels (nitrates/phosphates) for the different sampling sites were low and indicative<br />

<strong>of</strong> low- induced impacts and/or flow through circulation as is common in non-stratified water<br />

columns. The total phosphate value ranged from 0.02 mg/l to 0.05 mg/l which is low by DoE<br />

standards for any water body. Samples 1, 2 and 7 had the highest readings for this parameter at<br />

0.05 and 0.03 mg/l respectively (See Fig. 2.10). These values can probably be attributed to the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> the Bay <strong>of</strong> Chetumal, although other factors can be considered as well.<br />

Conversely, the nitrate concentrations for these two points were low as compared to the other<br />

sites. The nitrate concentration ranged from 6.60 mg/l to 8.36 mg/l which is normal for these<br />

types <strong>of</strong> water bodies.<br />

In regards to the oxygen concentrations, the results were very encouraging as the values were<br />

more than7.58 % which indicates a good saturation mixture. The oxygen concentrations ranges<br />

are important in maintaining a healthy marine environment.<br />

Salinity<br />

Salinity varies across the Belizean continental shelf in a north to south direction, as well as in an<br />

east to west direction. The variation in salinity along an east to west axis generally shows higher<br />

salinities as one proceeds eastwards or away from the mainland influences, which is a function <strong>of</strong><br />

the decreased riverine freshwater inputs. Thus oceanic conditions with relatively high salinities<br />

(3.0-3.8 %) prevail in the more distal waters <strong>of</strong> the shelf lagoon, as well as the barrier lagoon and<br />

reef system. This situation is accentuated during the drier months. Thus oceanic conditions are<br />

normally experienced in the deep sea and across barrier lagoon, the barrier Platform and the deep<br />

sea beyond the reef.<br />

The salinity range recorded by TNCE during the field visits were uniform and within range <strong>of</strong><br />

the aforementioned oceanic conditions. The range varied from 24 ppt at the back <strong>of</strong> the Laguna<br />

2-16


de Boca Ciega to 3.18 % at the windward side facing the Hol Chan Marine Reserve [See Fig.<br />

2.10]. This area registered the highest concentration averaging about 3.19%s whilst the lagoon<br />

portion registered a lower range.<br />

This pattern also holds true for the conductivity values which are similar across all the sets taken<br />

as well as for the total hardness concentration.<br />

Similarly, the temperature ranges within the sample sites remained constant averaging about 23 -<br />

24º C. However, the area closer to the mainland registered slightly lower reading for all<br />

parameters. The results however [See Fig 2.10] are still within the acceptable range and will not<br />

have any major impact on the project.<br />

2.1.2.8 Heavy Metals<br />

Reviewing the results provided by Pace Analytical Laboratory [See Annex V], there were only<br />

four heavy metals that were detected in the 7 samples sent for analysis. Four heavy metals were<br />

detected at the sample site 1 which was the closest to the mainland. Sample sites 2, 3, 4 & 5 had<br />

only two heavy metals detected, while sample sites 6 and 7 had three heavy metals detected. Of<br />

the four heavy metals detected, only two were present in all samples, namely Arsenic and<br />

Chromium.<br />

All samples had Arsenic present in quantities that are within acceptable limits. Uncontaminated<br />

marine sediment contains a level <strong>of</strong> 5 – 40 mg/kg <strong>of</strong> Arsenic. It must be noted that Arsenic<br />

originates from volcanic and hydrothermal sources, along with pollution from mining,<br />

agricultural run<strong>of</strong>f and several other anthropogenic sources. It is therefore noted that the range<br />

<strong>of</strong> Arsenic detected in our studies, from 1.57 to 5.29 mg/kg, is well within the acceptable limits<br />

for marine sediment [See Annex V].<br />

Chromium was also present in all samples. Based on Alternate Metal Standards (AMS) the<br />

highest acceptable limit for Chromium is 2<strong>2.0</strong> mg/kg. The detected amount <strong>of</strong> Chromium was in<br />

the range <strong>of</strong> 1.37 to 4.83mg/kg, which meets standards [See Annex V]. The highest reading was<br />

at sample site 1, and this could be attributed to the influence <strong>of</strong> land based run<strong>of</strong>f and also from<br />

the Bomba, New River and Rio Hondo Rivers that empty into the area, combined with the longshore<br />

sediment drift.<br />

Selenium was the third heavy metal detected in the samples; however this metal was only found<br />

in samples, 1, 6 & 7. These three samples are notably at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the corridor, and at the<br />

sampling site in the Boca Ciega Area and in the San Pedro Lagoon. The acceptable range limits<br />

for Selenium is 0 .046 to 10.65 mg/kg [See Annex V]. The results had a range <strong>of</strong> 3.52 to 7.86<br />

mg/kg, thus well within the allowable and safety limits. It is considered that the three areas with<br />

detectable limits <strong>of</strong> Selenium are due to the fact that Selenium can be cause by run<strong>of</strong>fs <strong>of</strong> sewer<br />

ponds and untreated liquid/sewage waste (anthropogenic sources). Considering that the last two<br />

sampling sites with the highest readings are located behind San Pedro Town [See Fig. 2.10b] and<br />

close to the sewer lagoons, the result can be attributed to the effluent <strong>of</strong> the sewer ponds.<br />

2-17


Finally, Zinc is the last detected heavy metal <strong>of</strong> all the samples, and it was only detected in the<br />

first sample at a level <strong>of</strong> 2.49 mg/kg [See Annex V]. According to AMS the allowable limit <strong>of</strong><br />

Zinc is 90.0 mg/kg. Thus as can be seen, the detected level is way below the allowable limit.<br />

Therefore, as can be determined from the results <strong>of</strong> the analysis, there is no potential danger from<br />

the re-suspension <strong>of</strong> heavy metals into the water column by the project activities proposed by btl.<br />

For a more detailed report, see Annex V.<br />

2-18


Fig. 2.10: Water Quality Results<br />

2-19


Fig. 2.10 (b): Heavy metals sampling sites and Results<br />

2-20


2.1.3 Geology<br />

The geological component will consist <strong>of</strong> a geological history <strong>of</strong> the area along with the relevant<br />

geomorphology and subsurface geology. The components also describe northern Belize to a<br />

larger extent. Much <strong>of</strong> the geological information obtained for this section was extracted from<br />

geological studies undertaken by Dr. S. J. Mazzullo on Ambergris Caye, which can be viewed at:<br />

http://ambergriscaye.com/pages/mayan/Sedimentology-mazzullo.html and also Holocene<br />

Sediments <strong>of</strong> the Belize Shelf by Dr. Clif Jordan,2002.<br />

The geology <strong>of</strong> Belize is divided into two (2) principal types <strong>of</strong> consolidated rocks. These two<br />

(2) rock types are the younger, Cretaceous age thick limestone and non-calcareous rocks, and the<br />

older unfaulted Paleozoic sediments and igneous intrusions <strong>of</strong> the Maya Mountains (Dixon,<br />

1955).<br />

The Yucatan Peninsula is comprised <strong>of</strong> a large geologic area known as the Maya or Yucatan bloc<br />

(Donelly and others, 1990). The entire Yucatan Peninsula, including Belize, is included in the<br />

Maya or Yucatan Bloc.<br />

In Northern Belize, the Cretaceous to Eocene limestone bedrock is the principal geologic unit<br />

dominating the region (Ower, 1956).<br />

During phases <strong>of</strong> the late Jurassic to Late Cretaceous periods, the Yucatan Peninsula underwent<br />

deposition <strong>of</strong> carbonate material consisting chiefly <strong>of</strong> limestone and dolomite. Limestone<br />

deposition occurred during the late Cretaceous period (Donelly and Ramos, 1990).<br />

Flores (1952) and Ower (1956) have described these limestones as ranging from Cretaceous to<br />

Eocene in age. Limestones in Northern Belize are inter-bedded with sediments such as<br />

siltstones, sands and clays (Ower, 1956).<br />

The rocks <strong>of</strong> Northern Belize are classified primarily into two (2) principal groups:<br />

(a) white marls and associated deposits, and,<br />

(b) Limestones.<br />

2.1.3.1 Geological History<br />

Ambergris Caye and the northern part <strong>of</strong> the Belize mainland, lies within the geologic area<br />

known as the Yucatan Platform. The geologic history <strong>of</strong> this area before the Cretaceous Period<br />

(some 140 million years ago) is only partially understood. Apparently the Yucatan Platform and<br />

presumably the Ambergris Caye area was land 195 million years ago and between 195 and 140<br />

million years ago (during the Jurassic Period) the area was slowly inundated by sea waters and<br />

sediments began to be deposited on the platform area (Mazzulu, 2000).<br />

By 140 million years ago the platform was nearly all under water with limestones being<br />

deposited all across it. The conditions responsible for relatively continuous deposition <strong>of</strong><br />

limestones have persisted until fairly recently, from a geologic point <strong>of</strong> view. This has resulted in<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> a thick sequence <strong>of</strong> limestones that underlie Ambergris Caye and the northern<br />

2-21


Belize. In recent geologic time the area <strong>of</strong> and around Ambergris Caye has alternated between<br />

being a shallow sea floor and being exposed as dry land.<br />

In other words the glaciers alternately advanced and retreated across the continents during the<br />

Pleistocene Period, from 1.6 million to 10,000 years ago. As they advanced and ice built up,<br />

global sea level dropped and exposed the limestones on the caye to rainwater, which resulted in<br />

the formation <strong>of</strong> the many caves and sinkholes (cenotes) on the caye and throughout Belize.<br />

These features are known as "karst". As the glaciers retreated global sea level rose and new<br />

limestones were formed.<br />

On Ambergris Caye, the oldest rocks exposed at the surface are Late Pleistocene and Holocene<br />

in age (See Fig. 2.1). The youngest limestones on the caye, such as at Reef (Rocky) Point, are<br />

125,000 years old and they were exposed on land until about 6,100 years ago when sea level<br />

began to rise again to its present stand. These rocks also have karst features.<br />

2.1.3.2 Geomorphology and Sub-surface Geology<br />

In geological time the project corridor area and Ambergris Caye were created by the deposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> sediments, consisting <strong>of</strong> calcareous materials (sand and mud), which were overlain above a<br />

limestone ridge [See Figs. 2.11 & 2.11(b)]. The formation <strong>of</strong> this ridge started about 2 million<br />

years ago during the Pleistocene era and continues into the present period. The various sediments<br />

overlaying this limestone are found in different areas <strong>of</strong> the peninsula but a general pattern is<br />

clear. Along the beach berm the sediments are predominantly sand derived from fragments <strong>of</strong><br />

coral formations and allies.<br />

The sands in the lagoon system behind the reef and within the reef system itself are also derived<br />

from this source. In the region east <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye in the area referred to as Chetumal Bay<br />

there are also deposition <strong>of</strong> sandy structures but the source is different. These sands are derived<br />

primarily from 1 cell protozoan animals <strong>of</strong>ten referred to as “Sordid Foramifera”[See Fig<br />

2.11(b)]. As a general rule these sands are much finer than the sands derived from the coral<br />

formations and are not as much sought after for recreational purposes such as tourism resorts.<br />

The Bulkhead Shoals [See Fig. 2.11(d)] are practically in the midway point <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

corridor, and this area has effects on the currents and material makeup <strong>of</strong> the area. Due to the<br />

muddy areas [See Fig. 2.11(b), there are approximately 8 to 12 inches <strong>of</strong> mud/silt on top <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sand on the seabed.<br />

Further North West near the mainland and in the Cangrejo Shoals area [See Fig 2.11(c)], these<br />

minute sediments get even smaller, being derived primarily from the breakdown <strong>of</strong> microscopic<br />

“Miliolid Foraminifera”. As a consequence <strong>of</strong> small particle size these sediments are<br />

characteristically muddy in texture.<br />

In certain areas there are exposed limestone outcroppings at various location interspersed with<br />

areas that are covered by sediments. In these areas the limestone is close to the surface and it is<br />

between these exposed ridges that sediments settle with depths ranging from 0 – 2 m. Along with<br />

2-22


the beach ridge these exposed limestone areas support the major terrestrial plant and animal<br />

communities <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye.<br />

Areas not part <strong>of</strong> the beach ridge or the exposed limestone areas fall into the wetlands region,<br />

which comprise a large area <strong>of</strong> the Ambergris Caye peninsula. Although not used for residential<br />

or tourism development these wetland areas are vital to the well being <strong>of</strong> the marine ecosystem,<br />

providing a variety <strong>of</strong> services, including filtration <strong>of</strong> sediments, nurseries for juvenile marine<br />

life forms and protection from storm damage.<br />

A typical cross section <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye and associated areas is shown in Fig.2.11. The figure<br />

shows the main geological formation from Chetumal Bay to the barrier reef including the main<br />

sediment formations between Ambergris Caye and the mainland and Ambergris Caye and the<br />

Belize Barrier Reef.<br />

Fig. 2.11: Typical cross section <strong>of</strong> the geological formations underlying Ambergris Caye and<br />

associated areas.<br />

2-23


Fig 2.11(b) Classification <strong>of</strong> Sea-bead for the country <strong>of</strong> Belize<br />

2-24


Fig. 2.11(c): Map showing the Cangrejo Shoals area<br />

Fig. 2.11(d) Map showing location <strong>of</strong> Bulkhead Shoals<br />

2-25


Fig. 2.12 Geological Map <strong>of</strong> Belize<br />

2-26


Fig 2.13: Geological Chart for Belize<br />

2-27


2.1.3.3 Seismology<br />

According to the seismicity <strong>of</strong> Central America and the seismic intensity map <strong>of</strong> Belize, much <strong>of</strong><br />

this activity is located to the west in the mountainous provinces <strong>of</strong> Chiapas, Mexico and the south<br />

in neighboring Guatemala and Honduras [See Plate 2.1 and Fig. 2.14]. For Belize, earthquake<br />

hazard increases steadily from the north to the south and in addition, as can be seen in Fig. 2.14,<br />

the project falls in the < 5.0 magnitude scale (Richter scale). Earthquakes that affect the country <strong>of</strong><br />

Belize occur in the Gulf <strong>of</strong> Honduras which is the plate boundary zone between North America<br />

and the Caribbean. Belize, on occasion would experience mild tremors as the one experienced on<br />

November 26, which occurred in Chiapas, Mexico and was registered at 5.8.<br />

Ambergris Caye is located parallel along a major fault line or zone as can be seen in the Geological<br />

Fault Location map, (See Figs. 2.15, 2.15(b) & 2.15 (c)). This cannot be said for the entire length<br />

the modern barrier reef as it sits atop a prominent fault that separates the shallow platform to the<br />

west from the deeper Caribbean to the east, where water depths progressively approach 13,123 feet<br />

(4,000 meters). Turneffe, Lighthouse and Glovers Atolls all sit atop major fault blocks ("horsts")<br />

that formed as a result <strong>of</strong> the eastward sliding <strong>of</strong> the Caribbean plate past Belize and the North<br />

American plate. The major NE-trending faults shown in the accompanying map are "normal faults"<br />

that include portions that have dropped down on their eastern sides. The nearly EW-trending fault<br />

on the south is the boundary <strong>of</strong> the North American and Caribbean plates.<br />

With this in mind and based on the different geological maps, the proposed project is prone to<br />

some seismic activity. It is necessary therefore that the cable is buried at an appropriate depth, and<br />

that the casing <strong>of</strong> the cable be designed to withstand any such activities.<br />

2 - 28


Fig. 2.14 Seismic Intensity Map <strong>of</strong> Belize and project site<br />

2 - 29


Fig. 2.15 Geological Fault Map <strong>of</strong> Belize<br />

2 - 30


Fig 2.15 (b) Map showing the Motagua Swan Island Fault<br />

Fig 2.15(c): Map showing the regional faults, plates and movements<br />

2 - 31


2.1.4 Soils<br />

The soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the proposed project was determined based on the geological history <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area as well as data obtained in the field by the consultancy team. The soils component, which is<br />

a part <strong>of</strong> the geological description, will consist <strong>of</strong> a soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile describing the effects it will have<br />

on the project activities.<br />

2.1.4.1 Soil Characterization<br />

In the land classification scheme Ambergris Caye falls within the Northern Coastal Plains land<br />

region (King et. al., 1992). The landform in this region is characteristically flat to undulating. At<br />

Ambergris Caye four principal land subtypes are identifiable, but <strong>of</strong>ten in combination with each<br />

other. These are:<br />

a) Corozal Saline (ZY) – Soils <strong>of</strong> the Corozal Saline region contain Shipstern and Ycacos<br />

soils, which support different vegetation types depending on their associations or<br />

isolation from each other. In some areas scrub savannah vegetation will be found whereas<br />

in other areas tree savannahs are found. In purely Ycacos soils mangrove formations and<br />

herbaceous swamps will thrive. Ycacos soils are highly saline hence favoring salt tolerant<br />

species. The parent material <strong>of</strong> these soils, are hill wash and wet alluvial.<br />

b) North Ambergris Plain (AL) – Contain Shipstern Soils, which on the North Ambergris<br />

Plain are shallow calcareous sands over ancient coral. The Shipstern parent material is<br />

beach sand. These soils are characterized by limited moisture content, having limited<br />

water available to plants during the extended dry season, which is typical <strong>of</strong> this region.<br />

These soils support primarily beach type broadleaf forest.<br />

c) West Ambergris Plain (AN) – Like the Corozal Saline, soils <strong>of</strong> the West Ambergris Plain<br />

also contains Shipstern and Ycacos soils. Not surprisingly, these soils are <strong>of</strong>ten found at<br />

the intergrade between the Corozal Saline and the North Ambergris Plain System.<br />

d) Ambergris Strand Plain (AB) – Contain the so called “Ambergris Soils”, which dominate<br />

the windward side <strong>of</strong> the peninsula and are formed from the accumulation <strong>of</strong> sandy<br />

sediments which were deposited by the southerly flowing long shore currents that flow<br />

parallel to Ambergris Caye.<br />

2.1.4.2 Bedrock/Resistance Probing<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> rod perforations were done to bedrock on the project site, especially Stage 2 Phases 2<br />

a & b to determine the different soil layers and to determine their depth, structure and suitability<br />

for the proposed project. These perforations were done along the proposed project corridor and<br />

although there were some variations in depth, a general picture <strong>of</strong> the prevailing bedrock pattern<br />

emerged [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. These probing were done to in order to determine the ease <strong>of</strong><br />

access to the required 3 feet for cable burial into the sea bed, and the type <strong>of</strong> material that will be<br />

encountered.<br />

2 - 32


The pr<strong>of</strong>ile shows that along Stage 2 Phase 1, there won’t be any need to penetrate into bedrock,<br />

as there is sufficient sand material along the proposed project corridor. The material in the<br />

section tends to range from clay with sand to sandy silt with small gravel and shells as the<br />

corridor moves East towards San Pedro. The lagoon water column depth behind San Pedro<br />

varied from 0’ – 4 feet with the upper horizontal layer <strong>of</strong> the lagoon bed consisted <strong>of</strong> decaying<br />

inorganic matter mostly from plant debris (peat) with some fine sediment, clays, and sand. This<br />

layer was readily distinguishable on the basis <strong>of</strong> appearance, having a dark black color. The<br />

upper horizon layer varied in depth from one locale on the property to the next but mostly fell<br />

between 0 – 3.5 feet.<br />

Such peat formations are called Cyclothems. A cyclothem is a unit <strong>of</strong> peat and clastic sediments.<br />

The clastic sediment is the accumulated remains <strong>of</strong> broken rocks and skeletal remains <strong>of</strong> dead<br />

organism (detritus). Beneath the peat layer is the limestone bedrock, which as was previously<br />

mentioned can protrude to the surface along the coastal ridge.<br />

2.1.4.3 Soil Sample Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

During the study, soil samples were collected at 4 locations and analyzed (See Fig.2.16). The<br />

results show the samples collected at the different sites are composed predominantly <strong>of</strong> clay with<br />

sand to sandy silt with small gravel and shells as it travels towards the East. In other words, fine<br />

to coarse sand that is mixed with calcareous (carbonatious) materials. The results also show that<br />

the composition <strong>of</strong> sand in the total makeup decreases as one move away from the coastline. The<br />

proposed project will therefore look for this type <strong>of</strong> sand in order to carry out the project<br />

activities.<br />

2.1.4.4 Recommendation <strong>of</strong> Soil Study<br />

The main trust <strong>of</strong> the geotechnical study was the performance <strong>of</strong> determining the bedrock<br />

elevation by coring at selected locations in an attempt to determine the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile. Due to the<br />

fact that the soils were highly silty, this sampling was difficult. However, it soon became clear<br />

that the soil pr<strong>of</strong>ile is very consistent along the proposed site, and especially down to a shallow<br />

depth that is typical <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye when drawing near to San Pedro.<br />

2 - 33


Left: Sample A showing mostly clay with sand and some prop roots. Minimal peat material<br />

being excavated nearby. Right: Sand mixed for the first 2 ft with Sandy silt being the remaining<br />

18 inches [See Fig. 2.16]<br />

Plate 2.2 Examples <strong>of</strong> Soil Conditions along Project Corridor for Stage 2 Phase 1<br />

Left: Sample C showing mostly silty sand and sandy silt with some sparse shells. Right: Silty<br />

Sand mixed with sandy silt and Small gravel with shells [See Fig. 2.16]<br />

Plate 2.3 Examples <strong>of</strong> Soil Conditions along Project Corridor for Stage 2 Phase 1<br />

2 - 34


Fig. 2.16 Sediment Sample Location<br />

2 - 35


The probing <strong>of</strong> the project corridor reveals low bearing capacity soils to a shallow depth over<br />

Stage 2 Phase 2 a & b. Refusal was encountered in all locations at relatively shallow depths<br />

which indicate a large shallow bedrock zone [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. As can be seen from the<br />

soil testing results described, the soils in the upper levels on the project area have low bearing<br />

capacity. Because <strong>of</strong> the type <strong>of</strong> soils encountered (organic silt and some sand) it is not advisable<br />

to place floating or strip foundations for significant structures to bear on these soils. Not only are<br />

the bearing capacities very low, but also the properties <strong>of</strong> organic soils are unreliable and <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

change over time as matter decays.<br />

Recommendations<br />

Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the bedrock probing and the soil sampling, it is recommended that the<br />

water jet plough be used for Stage 2 Phase 1 <strong>of</strong> the project, while a backhoe or similar equipment<br />

be utilized to complete Stage 2 Phase 2 a & b due to the high emergence <strong>of</strong> bedrock.<br />

2.1.5 Displacement <strong>of</strong> Materials<br />

The project activities for the proposed project will be carried out in by a series <strong>of</strong> forecasted<br />

project activities. With this in mind, the aforementioned component will involve two (2) phases<br />

that will be broken down to smaller sub-phases as the development progresses. Therefore, the<br />

activities process will involve the burial <strong>of</strong> Stage 2 Phase 1, which is 19.15 km <strong>of</strong> mostly sand,<br />

clay and silt, and then Stage 2 Phase 2 the last 4.11 km the proposed project which is comprised<br />

<strong>of</strong> some sand and bedrock [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. Considering these forecasted activities, the<br />

project has no plans to utilize the excavated materials (spoils) for any purpose. The material is<br />

expected to fall back naturally.<br />

In the general view <strong>of</strong> the forecasted activities and considering the project site, the development<br />

plans to utilize the spoils to backfill over the SFOC, especially along the bedrock areas [See Fig.<br />

1.6].<br />

2.1.5.1 Types <strong>of</strong> Cable Burial Equipment<br />

There are many factors in choosing the correct and appropriate equipment for the proposed<br />

project activities. One <strong>of</strong> these factors is the type <strong>of</strong> material, depth <strong>of</strong> water, the location <strong>of</strong> the<br />

activity and finally, the deposition <strong>of</strong> the dredging spoils or materials. There are a variety <strong>of</strong> tools<br />

or dredgers capable <strong>of</strong> being used for such a project. So all these issues may play an important<br />

role in economic analysis, but ultimately, if the work is to be accomplished by contract, the<br />

competitive bidding process will <strong>of</strong>ten serve as the final decision mechanism (Herbich, 2000).<br />

With this in mind it is anticipated that the proposed btl FOC project will utilize a Jetting Plough<br />

for the major portion <strong>of</strong> the anticipated. This type <strong>of</strong> equipment uses a jetting system that forces<br />

out water at the base <strong>of</strong> the plough, thus liquefying the sediment, the plough then easily digs the<br />

substrate to the desired depth. Immediately behind, the FOC is laid, and due to the liquefied<br />

material still in suspension, the cable sinks easily into the material that was disturbed, which<br />

resettles covering the cable. This equipment is towed behind a barge or supply vessel [See Plate<br />

2 - 36


2.4 & 2.5].<br />

The other mechanism will include the use <strong>of</strong> some sort <strong>of</strong> excavator and grab type machines [See<br />

Plate 2.5] for the Stage 2 Phase 2 a & b section <strong>of</strong> the project, due to the fact that bedrock is<br />

inches <strong>of</strong> the sea floor. Little can be done to mitigate direct effects <strong>of</strong> activities in this type <strong>of</strong><br />

environment, but due to the fact that it is mostly bedrock, the sedimentation problem will be<br />

greatly reduced. This compiled with the operation only occurring during incoming tides, the<br />

possibility detrimental sedimentation occurring to sensitive areas south <strong>of</strong> the project will be<br />

minimal. Choosing a method and environmental circumstance that minimizes damage is the<br />

ultimate purpose <strong>of</strong> the project. It is therefore important to note, that since the burial <strong>of</strong> the cable<br />

will be contracted, the equipment utilized will probably change, but if that is the case, a complete<br />

report on the methodology used will be submitted to DOE as it becomes available.<br />

2 - 37


Platform Supply Vessels<br />

Plate 2.4: Types <strong>of</strong> Supply vessels used in cable laying operations<br />

2 - 38


Left: Example <strong>of</strong> a back hoe outfitted with a crusher on the bucked. This assists in breaking up<br />

the bedrock so that it can be used as back fill. Note the rotating crusher on the stern <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bucket. Right: Sketch <strong>of</strong> plough jetter used in s<strong>of</strong>t areas [See Annex III].<br />

Plate 2.5 Examples <strong>of</strong> Equipment to be utilized<br />

2.1.5.2 Volumes <strong>of</strong> Displaced Materials<br />

Based on the calculations [See Table 2.2] <strong>of</strong> the forecasted events (Stage 2 Phases 1 & 2), the<br />

proposed project will disturb an estimated 7,781.50 cubic meters <strong>of</strong> material that will not be<br />

extracted, but instead will be used to cover the SFOC. Based on this methodology, the volume<br />

<strong>of</strong> material displaced will be adequate to cover the SFOC providing additional protection.<br />

Of this amount, it is estimated that Stage 2 Phase 1 will displace about 7,011.21 m 3 <strong>of</strong> material<br />

and Stage 2 Phases 2 a & b will displace 770.29m³ <strong>of</strong> material. The entire area to be disturbed,<br />

with dimensions <strong>of</strong> approximately 3 ft deep by 1.5 ft wide will measure about 2.11 acres. The<br />

seabed pr<strong>of</strong>ile for this site consists <strong>of</strong> an uneven floor with several undulating mounds where<br />

material can be obtained for fill [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. Other seafloor pr<strong>of</strong>iles <strong>of</strong> the site<br />

indicate that there is ample sand depth in the first Phase, however, for Phase 2, due to the<br />

emergence <strong>of</strong> bedrock; another methodology will be utilized.<br />

These volumes are modest given the scale and magnitude <strong>of</strong> the proposed project. It is<br />

anticipated, as explained previously, that much <strong>of</strong> the material will consist <strong>of</strong> sand, clay, gravel,<br />

shells and peat. The activities conducted in these areas will not impose major environmental<br />

impacts that can and will be mitigated by means <strong>of</strong> engineering controls and monitoring (See<br />

Chapters 5 and 6).<br />

2-39


Table 2.1 Anticipated disturbed volumes <strong>of</strong> material caused by the proposed project<br />

LOCATION SUBSTRATE<br />

TYPE<br />

LENGTH<br />

(km)<br />

2-40<br />

WIDTH<br />

(m)<br />

AREA<br />

(acres)<br />

A to B Sea bed 19.15 0.38 1.80<br />

B to Channel Bedrock 1.28 0.30 0.10<br />

Channel to Sediment & 2.83 0.30 0.21<br />

Landing Bedrock<br />

TOTAL<br />

(break down)<br />

2.11<br />

Length (m) Width (m) Depth (m) Material (m³) Total<br />

Rock<br />

1280 0.31 0.91 361.09<br />

2200 0.31 0.6 409.20<br />

770.29 770.29<br />

Sand<br />

2200 0.31 0.31 211.42<br />

630 0.31 0.91 177.72<br />

19150 0.38 0.91 662<strong>2.0</strong>7<br />

7011.21 7011.21<br />

Landings<br />

142 0.31 0.91 40.06<br />

9.14 0.31 0.91 2.58<br />

42.64 42.64<br />

GRAND TOTAL 7824.14<br />

2.1.5.3 Project Activities<br />

This activity will involve the use <strong>of</strong> engineering controls to safely operate in the area where it<br />

will be utilized. As described earlier, the operation will take place during daylight hours, which<br />

during the months <strong>of</strong> February to August have the highest amount <strong>of</strong> sunshine percentage [See<br />

Fig. 2.5c] and only during incoming tide once behind San Pedro.<br />

As mentioned previously, the project corridor runs for approximately 24 km from the mainland<br />

coast <strong>of</strong> Belize to San Pedro, Ambergris Caye [See Figs. 2.2, 2.3 & 2.4]. In considering the<br />

project corridor, the proposed project will need to utilize two types <strong>of</strong> equipments, one a plough


jetter and the other a back hoe with stone crushing capabilities [See Plate 2.5]. Noting that the<br />

spoil will be used to fill back over the SFOC, there will be no need for the transportation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

spoil material to any other destination. The material will resettle naturally, especially in Phase 2,<br />

which will then be used to cover the SFOC for further protection. This will aid in reducing<br />

navigational hazards, especially at night.<br />

2.1.5.4 Sedimentation Control<br />

In view <strong>of</strong> this, there is also no need for a containment mechanism. Taking into consideration<br />

the nature <strong>of</strong> the project and the methods to be utilized, the material will naturally settle over the<br />

SFOC and consolidate itself, providing protection to the SFOC. In other words, once the SFOC<br />

is laid, which is immediately after the plough passes; the material will settle and naturally<br />

compact itself. This is a very cost effective method for backfilling over the SFOC.<br />

This method has also been used on the BEL Power II Project that runs from coastal Belize to San<br />

Pedro, basically the same route as the btl SFOC. Subsequent to this activity, a visual survey is<br />

made <strong>of</strong> the entire cable route to ensure that the cable is indeed buried. If not, then sand is either<br />

obtained from another source or it is left for time to backfill by virtue <strong>of</strong> the currents and<br />

sediment transport from the rivers that empty into the area.<br />

Sedimentation or siltation for that matter will be generated during the project activities. In<br />

addition, these factors can be generated during the project development and more importantly<br />

during project operation. In view <strong>of</strong> the potential impacts this process can have on the<br />

environment the following practices will be taken into account along with the appropriate<br />

mitigation measures (See Chapter 6).<br />

The project activities will be done in phases. There will be a sufficient time between each<br />

phase for any suspended material to settle.<br />

All activities will be done in calm sea states thereby minimizing the potential for<br />

sediment dispersal.<br />

The activities behind San Pedro will only be done during the incoming tide. This will aid<br />

in avoiding the sedimentation plume to affect Hol Chan.<br />

2.1.5.5 Fire Control<br />

The section <strong>of</strong> the Overhead Fiber Optic Cable (OFOC) will be the only section <strong>of</strong> the cable that<br />

is vulnerable to fire. As can be seen from Fig. 2.17, the fire risk for the area is large, with a<br />

small section being extreme risk and the other sections low risk. It is therefore <strong>of</strong> utmost<br />

importance that the corridor be maintained and cleared, especially during the dry season, when<br />

fires are more abundant, which is from April to June, however, there is also a “maga season”<br />

during July to August that sometimes is also as dry. Due to the fact that btl will be using the<br />

transmission poles belonging to BEL, it is BEL’s job to maintain the corridors clean and clear <strong>of</strong><br />

any debris that might be considered fuel for fires.<br />

2-41


Fig 2.17: Fire risk chart<br />

2.1.6 Ecosystem Pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

This pr<strong>of</strong>ile is described in detail in Section 2.2 along with a description <strong>of</strong> the flora and fauna <strong>of</strong><br />

the entire project corridor. The ecosystem <strong>of</strong> importance to the project site is the Hol Chan<br />

Marine Reserve which is south <strong>of</strong> the project corridor. This marine reserve was declared a<br />

reserve by S.I. 57 <strong>of</strong> 1987 on the 25 th July 1987, and amended by S.I. 100 <strong>of</strong> 1999. The reserve<br />

is comprised <strong>of</strong> four zones, the Preservation Zone, the Conservation Zone, the General Use<br />

Zone, and Shark Ray Alley. It was again amended to include the Cangrejo Cayes by S.I. 116 <strong>of</strong><br />

2008.<br />

Hol Chan has so far been the most widely visited reserve in the country (BTB 2007), and has<br />

been used as a model not only for the other reserves in the country, but also in the region. The<br />

reserve is well funded, and has its own trust fund that has been utilized to maintain and upgrade<br />

not only the park itself, by installing moorings within the area, but also to upgrade the reserve<br />

<strong>of</strong>fices which are located in San Pedro Town. Thus the Reserve is not fully dependent on the<br />

budget <strong>of</strong> the Government <strong>of</strong> Belize.<br />

2-42


Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the Reserve, the Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> is the Governmental agency<br />

responsible for all Marine Reserves, but due to the fact that the Reserve has a trust fund, there is<br />

a Board <strong>of</strong> Directors that manages the finances <strong>of</strong> the reserve, while the staff, under the<br />

directives <strong>of</strong> the Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> is responsible for the day to day activities <strong>of</strong> the Reserve<br />

and its operations at sea. The reserve has so far been one <strong>of</strong> the main reasons why the San Pedro<br />

Community divested their interest from Fishing to Tourism, and has prospered. It is with this in<br />

mind that the residents <strong>of</strong> the island are so protected <strong>of</strong> the Hol Chan Marine Reserve.<br />

2.1.7 Land Use<br />

It is anticipated that the land use for the project corridor and related surrounding areas will<br />

involve the use <strong>of</strong> traditional utilization coupled with the growing tourism sector as summarized<br />

in the following sections.<br />

2.1.7.1 Land Use <strong>of</strong> Project Site<br />

The project area is relatively an undeveloped zone except for the BEL transmission lines and<br />

submarine cable. Most <strong>of</strong> the developments around the area is tourism related. With this in mind,<br />

the proposed project will venture to further enhance tourism related business by <strong>of</strong>fering fast and<br />

reliable service along with a host <strong>of</strong> related amenities and services that will sustain the project.<br />

Therefore the site currently has no agricultural value and considering the fact that the OFOC<br />

section is being accommodated by BEL transmission poles, the project won’t interfere with any<br />

activity planned for the area.<br />

Tourism is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing industries in Belize next to oil and generating substantial<br />

income for the country while requiring much more servicing that any other industry. As the<br />

main attraction <strong>of</strong> the Belizean tourism industry, this area continues to attract capital and new<br />

investments, which in turn provide opportunities for new settlers, migrant laborers and service<br />

providers who come to share in the windfall. Considering the potential land use <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

site, the proponent will not affect the planned use <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the area that it is utilizing, due to the<br />

fact that stage one is overhead on existing poles, and stage 2 is underwater, in an area that for the<br />

most part has a low biodiversity value [See Fig. 2.11(b) & 2.19] and stage 3 is joining up to an<br />

already existing underground network that exists in San Pedro. Furthermore, the developer will<br />

construct and install the necessary support services and amenities that are required for such<br />

project. This will eventual give rise to an increase in the economic flow to San Pedro Town and<br />

to a greater extent, the entire Ambergris Caye.<br />

The project site is a component <strong>of</strong> already cleared corridor for the OFOC and marine (seabed)<br />

area for the burial <strong>of</strong> the SFOC. The project site runs basically NE from the coast near Bomba to<br />

San Pedro Town. The area will traverse areas that are already in use by a similar project, the<br />

BEL Power II Project Submarine Cable, and then traverses a small section utilized by<br />

commercial barges that either transport sugar from the Sugar Factories in the North to Belize<br />

City or carry cargo to and from San Pedro Town. Additionally, there is traffic by tour operators<br />

and guides in the area, which they utilize to reach other destinations such as Bomba, Maskall,<br />

Corozal, or when the weather is rough, they utilize the leeward side <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye to go<br />

north to Bacalar Chico.<br />

2-43


Basically as mentioned earlier, the section that comprises Stage 1 is being done on an area that is<br />

already in use by the BEL Power II Project, and the FOC will be going overhead from Maskall to<br />

Bomba and then to the coastline on the existing transmission poles that are in use by BEL.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> the FOC landing in San Pedro Town, btl presently has an underground network<br />

that will be utilized to avoid having the FOC overhead. This will also assist in case <strong>of</strong> storms<br />

and hurricanes, alleviating the problems <strong>of</strong> down lines due to heavy winds.<br />

2.1.7.2 Land/Seabed Tenure<br />

On the OFOC section, the land tenure issue is <strong>of</strong> no consequence since it is already being utilized<br />

by BEL project transmission poles which the SFOC will be utilizing.<br />

Since the area to be utilized has already been used by a similar project, and the major Stage <strong>of</strong><br />

the project is the burial <strong>of</strong> the SFOC in the sea-bed, combined with the fact that the landing site<br />

in San Pedro is on a road access near an already existing manhole, the issue <strong>of</strong> Land use is <strong>of</strong> no<br />

major significance.<br />

Additionally, the marine area to be traversed by the project site is used by two main types <strong>of</strong><br />

vessel movements. The primary, which has been the use for many decades is as the barge route<br />

See Fig. 2.18(b) used by Belize Sugar Industries Ltd. to transport sugar and molasses to Belize<br />

City and the awaiting ships in the harbor.<br />

The second use, which has increased within the last decade, is as a route for the barges that<br />

transport materials from Belize City to San Pedro Town, whether it is construction or food. This<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> the important routes, since it is the supply route for the town, and if this route is blocked<br />

or shut <strong>of</strong>f, San Pedro could be in dire straits [See Fig. 2.18(b)].<br />

2-44


Fig. 2.18 Protected Areas Map <strong>of</strong> Northern Belize<br />

2-45


2.1.7.3 Land Use <strong>of</strong> Surrounding Areas<br />

The area adjacent to the project corridor consists <strong>of</strong> areas that are primarily used as fishing<br />

camps that are either leased or privately owned. Some <strong>of</strong> these areas are a part <strong>of</strong> the Hol Chan<br />

Marine Reserve and are subject to protection according to the different zoning schemes <strong>of</strong> the<br />

reserve. A few fisher-folk and their staff utilize the back area <strong>of</strong> the lagoon for several fishing<br />

activities, both recreational and commercial. As can be seen from Fig. 2.18, no section <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Hol Chan Marine Reserve will be disturbed by the project activities.<br />

2.1.7.4 Zone <strong>of</strong> Influence<br />

The proposed project coupled with the increase growth in the tourism sector will undoubtedly<br />

affect both the social and receiving environment. It is anticipated that the zone <strong>of</strong> influence will<br />

not be limited to the development zones within the project site but will extend the entire breadth<br />

and length <strong>of</strong> the greater Ambergris Caye. This also includes the navigable areas <strong>of</strong> the project<br />

site and the neighboring Hol Chan Marine Reserve [See Fig. 2.18].<br />

In the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> the project site all the settlements occupy a narrow band along the<br />

east coast. Indeed the prospects for settlements further inland (west) at this location are severely<br />

restrained by the presence <strong>of</strong> the Boca Ciega Lagoon and its surrounding marsh and mangrove.<br />

This lowland aquatic system essentially restricts development to a narrow strip along the east<br />

coast. There are no other land use in the immediate vicinity <strong>of</strong> this proposed project besides<br />

residential and tourism enterprises. It is anticipated that the proposed project will not influence<br />

other users <strong>of</strong> the area in terms <strong>of</strong> water and energy demand as well as wastewater and solid<br />

waste generation. In considering the project, the development will strictly be influencing the<br />

tourism sector and the Belizean population. It is anticipated that as the development unfolds, the<br />

information technology and traffic activity between San Pedro Town, Belize City and the worldwide-web<br />

will increase, thus increasing the exposure <strong>of</strong> not only San Pedro, but Belize on a<br />

whole under the guise <strong>of</strong> tourism potential and preferred destination.<br />

2-46


Fig: 2.18(b): Map Showing Traffic routes<br />

2-47


2.2 Flora and Fauna<br />

2.2.1 Vegetation<br />

Stage 1 <strong>of</strong> the project site is characterized by sub-tidal or permanently submerged aquatic<br />

vegetation and emergent inter-tidal herbaceous and woody flora, as well as terrestrial forest<br />

stands [See Fig.2.19]. The ‘rooted’ or attached sub-tidal vegetation <strong>of</strong> the site are a combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> sea grasses and macro-algae.<br />

Both the nearshore and <strong>of</strong>fshore marine areas have patches <strong>of</strong> sparse sea grass beds. These sea<br />

grass beds are comprised almost exclusively <strong>of</strong> the Turtle Grass - Thalassia testudinum. In some<br />

areas the Turtle Grass foliage is punctuated intermittently by shoots <strong>of</strong> macro-algae such as the<br />

Shaving Bush Algae (Penicillus pyriformis), the feather-shaped algae ( Caulerpa cupressoides)<br />

and the Green Chain Algae ( Halimeda copiosa) [See Table 2.3]. In the nearshore areas and<br />

shallow consolidated sand banks <strong>of</strong> the primary coast, the presence <strong>of</strong> the Manatee Grass<br />

(Syringodium filiforme) is noticeable.<br />

The inter-tidal emergent vegetation and terrestrial flora near the project corridor at the beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the SFOC is dependent on the forest type or vegetation assemblage. Much <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

immediately landward <strong>of</strong> the mangrove ‘zone’ <strong>of</strong> the primary sea coast was characterized by a<br />

littoral forest [See Fig. 2.19]. This area was a relatively high berm and beach ridge [See Plate<br />

2.6]. This area contained species such as: the black poisonwood (Met opium brownei), the wild<br />

grape (Cocoloba uvifera), and the coconut (Cocos nucifera) [See Table 2.3].<br />

The landward or western extent <strong>of</strong> the littoral forest was characterized by open grasslands and<br />

internal ponds which were for the most part rain-fed. The higher elevations <strong>of</strong> the corridor was<br />

characterized by the presence <strong>of</strong> less mangrove trees and scrubs and more woodland tree species<br />

such as the Gumbo Limbo (Bursera simaruba), the May Flower (Tabebouia rosea) and the Oak<br />

(Quercus anglohondurensis), as well as open grassland punctuated by isolated pine trees (Pinus<br />

caribaea) [See Table 2.3].<br />

The shoreline <strong>of</strong> the primary coast was colonized by mangroves [See Plate. #’s 2.7 – 2.9]. There<br />

was the typical zonation <strong>of</strong> Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle), followed by Black (Avicennia<br />

germinans) and White Mangroves (Laguncularia racemosa) [See Table 2.3].<br />

However, due to the fact that both the starting and the exit point <strong>of</strong> the FOC will be on land<br />

already developed, there is no need for the clearance <strong>of</strong> any vegetation, but there are marine<br />

fauna, however not in a healthy distribution as in the fore-reef areas. As can be seen, the sea-bed<br />

is silty and muddy [See Plate 2.12]. This type <strong>of</strong> substrate basically promotes the growth <strong>of</strong> only<br />

sparse seagrass distribution and some algae as shown in Plate 2.10 & 2.11.<br />

2-48


Fig. 2.19 Land and Seabed Classification (Courtesy J. Meerman)<br />

2-49


Table 2.2: Aquatic and Terrestrial Vegetation Found in and around the Project Area<br />

Common Name Scientific Name Source<br />

&<br />

Abundance<br />

Sub-Tidal<br />

Manatee Grass Syringodium filiforme Common<br />

Patchy distribution<br />

Halimeda Halimeda spp. Occasional<br />

Patchy distribution<br />

Green Algae Penicillus spp. Rare<br />

Patchy distribution<br />

Red Algae Laurencia spp. Rare<br />

Patchy distribution<br />

Brown Algae Dictyota linearis Occasional and patchy distribution<br />

Shaving Brush Algae Penicillus spp. Occasional and patchy distribution<br />

Mangroves<br />

Red Mangrove Rhizophora mangle Abundant<br />

Definitive stands<br />

White Mangrove Laguncularia racemosa Sparse<br />

Does not occur in distinct zones<br />

Mangrove Associates<br />

Buttonwood Conocarpus erectus Rare<br />

Isolated Distribution<br />

Black Poisonwood Metopium brownie Rare<br />

Isolated Distribution<br />

Sea Grape Coccoloba belizensis Occasional<br />

Isolated Distribution<br />

Woodland Vegetation<br />

Coconut Cocos nucifera Occasional<br />

Isolated Distribution<br />

Oak Quercus anglohondurensis Occasional<br />

Isolated Distribution<br />

Cockspur Acacia cookie Occasional<br />

Random Distribution<br />

Australian Pine Casuarina equisetifolia Occasional, limited distribution<br />

Palmetto Schippia concolor Occasional<br />

Patchy Distribution<br />

Gumbo Limbo Bursera simaruba Occasional<br />

Random distribution<br />

Mayflower Tabebouia rosea Rare<br />

Isolated distribution<br />

Bay Leaf Sabal mauritiformis Common<br />

Random distribution<br />

Saw Grass Cladium jamaicense Common, landform specific<br />

distribution<br />

2-50


Plate 2.6: Saw Grass Thicket adjacent to Plate2.7: Dwarf Mangrove Stand – Note<br />

Transmission line corridor (Mainland:ML) Moss- Dominated Forest Floor (ML)<br />

Plate 2.8: Primary Coast adjacent to Project Site Plate 2.9: Primary Coast adjacent to Project<br />

on ML, Downstream <strong>of</strong> project corridor corridor on ML, Upstream <strong>of</strong> landing site<br />

Plate 2.10: Sparse seagrass found in corridor Plate 2.11: Shaving brush algae<br />

2-51


Plate 2.12: Substrate along project corridor, note depth <strong>of</strong> silt, at least 12-14 ins.<br />

(note the divers hand is in the silt to his elbow)<br />

2.2.2 Aquatic Fauna<br />

2.2.2.1 Invertebrates<br />

Stage 2 <strong>of</strong> the project corridor was characterized by the presence <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> macroinvertebrates:<br />

Prominent among these were the crustaceans and molluscs. Familiar crustaceans<br />

encountered during the field survey or reported otherwise were the Blue Land Crab (Ucides sp.),<br />

the Fiddler Crab (Aratus pisonii), the Blue Crab or ‘Raati’ (Callinectes sapidus), and the Soldier<br />

Crab (Calcinus tibicen) [See Table 2.4]. The most abundant <strong>of</strong> these invertebrates on-shore were<br />

the Blue Land Crab (Ucides sp.) and the Soldier Crab ( Calcinus tibicen). The Blue Crab<br />

(Callinectes sapidus) and the Red Land Crab ( Grapsus grapsus) [See Plate 2.16] was fairly<br />

abundant in the nearshore areas <strong>of</strong> the primary sea coast.<br />

The Lobster (Panulirus argus) and the Caribbean King Crab (Mithrax spinossisimus) occurred in<br />

commercially exploitable quantities in the <strong>of</strong>fshore areas.<br />

The mollusks that were prominent in the area included: the Queen Conch (Strombus gigas) [See<br />

Table 2.3], Horse Conch ( Pleuroplanca gigantea) [See Table 2.4], the Mangrove Oyster<br />

(Crassostrea rhizophorea) [See Table 2.4], the Faust Tellin (Acraphagia fausta) [See Plate 2.14],<br />

the Common Atlantic Vase ( Vasum muricatum) [See Plate 2.11], and the Tulip Snail<br />

(Fasciolaria tulipa) [See Plate 2.10]. The Common Atlantic Vase (Vasum muricatum) was the<br />

most abundant mollusk and occurred in significant quantities in the near shore sea grass beds<br />

south <strong>of</strong> the outfall <strong>of</strong> the Mid-Winters Lagoon Estuary. The lobster (Panulirus argus) and the<br />

conch (Strombus gigas) were found mainly in the <strong>of</strong>fshore waters <strong>of</strong> the project site near San<br />

Pedro.<br />

2-52


The other invertebrate group found in the area that is noteworthy <strong>of</strong> mention is the echinoderms.<br />

This includes the Sea Star (Oreaster reticularis), the Donkey Dung Sea Cucumber (Holothuria<br />

mexicana), and the Sea Urchin (Tripneustes ventricosus). These animals were found mainly in<br />

the <strong>of</strong>fshore sea grass area [See Table 2.4].<br />

Table 2.3: Marine Macro-Invertebrates Found in and Around the Project Corridor<br />

Common Name Scientific Name Observed During<br />

Survey<br />

Blue Land Crab Ucides sp. <br />

Fiddler Crab Aratus pisonii <br />

Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus <br />

Red Land Crab Grapsus grapsus <br />

Hermit Crab<br />

(Soldier Crab)<br />

Calcinus tibicen <br />

2-53<br />

Reported Anecdotally<br />

Caribbean King<br />

Crab<br />

Mithrax spinossisimus <br />

Spiny Lobster Panulirus argus <br />

Slipper Lobster Scyllarides<br />

aequinoctialis<br />

Barnacle Lepas anatifera <br />

White Shrimp Peneaus schmitti <br />

Snapping Shrimp Gonodactylus oerstedii <br />

Queen Conch Strombus gigas <br />

Horse Conch Pleuroplanca gigantean <br />

Tulip Conch Fasciolaria tulipa <br />

Common<br />

Atlantic Vase<br />

Vasum muricatum <br />

Faust Tellin Acraphagia fausta <br />

Buttercup Lucine Anodontia alba <br />

Caribbean<br />

Thorny Oyster<br />

Spondylus caribaeum <br />

Periwinkle Littorina angulifera


Common Name Scientific Name Observed During<br />

Survey<br />

Mangrove Oyster Crassostrea rhizophorea <br />

American Oyster Crassostrea virginica <br />

Brittle Star Ophioderma<br />

brevicaudum<br />

<br />

Sea Urchin Tripneustes ventricosus <br />

Sea Star Oreaster reticularis <br />

Donkey Dung<br />

Sea Cucumber<br />

Holothuria mexicana <br />

2-54<br />

Reported Anecdotally<br />

Plate 2.13: Tulip Snail – Fasciolaria tulipa Plate 2.14: Common Atlantic Vase –<br />

Vasum muricat<br />

Plate 2.15: Unidentifiable Artifact Plate 2.16: Barnacle – Lepas anatifera


Plate 2.17: Faust Tellin – Acraphagia fuasta Plate 2.18: Tulip Snail – Fasciolaria<br />

tulipa [Left] & Hermit Crab - Calcinus<br />

tibicen [Right]<br />

Plate 2.19: Red Land Crab – Grapsus grapsus Plate 2.20: Grapsus grapsus [Ventral<br />

[Dorsal View] View]<br />

Plate 2.21: Caribbean King Crab - Mithrax Plate 2.22: Caribbean King Crab – Mithrax<br />

spinossisimus [Dorsal View] spinossisimus [Ventral View]<br />

2-55


2.2.2.2 Fishes<br />

Plate 2.23: Caribbean King Crab – Mithrax<br />

Spinossisimus [Left] & Red Land Crab Grapsus<br />

grapsus [Right]<br />

The fishes found in the surrounding areas <strong>of</strong> the project corridor are diverse. Although no<br />

biomass studies were done in relation to the current undertaking, anecdotal evidence indicates<br />

that the area has historically been productive [Pers. comm. Roy Swasey]. The diversity <strong>of</strong> fishlife<br />

in the surrounding areas <strong>of</strong> the beginning <strong>of</strong> the marine section <strong>of</strong> the project corridor is in<br />

large measure attributable to an estuarine influence on the habitat [Pers. comm. G. Myvett].<br />

The fishes also reflected a range <strong>of</strong> forms in terms <strong>of</strong> feeding ecology, as well as in relation to<br />

ancestry and adaptability to saline influences, or indeed the lack there<strong>of</strong>. In relation to the issue<br />

<strong>of</strong> feeding ecology, there was the presence <strong>of</strong> piscivorous stocks such as the Barracuda<br />

(Sphyraena baracuda), the Crevalle Jack ( Caranx hippos) and the Bull Shark ( Carcharhinus<br />

leucas), as well as herbivorous browsers such as the Atlantic Spade Fish (Chaetodipterus faber),<br />

the Least Puffer or ‘Mutruse’ (Sphoeroides nephelus) and the Mexican Molly ( Poecilia<br />

mexicana) [See Table 2.5]. There were also carnivorous benthivores present such as the Southern<br />

Sheeps Head ( Archosargus probatocephalus) and the Mayan Cichlid or ‘Crana’ ( Cichlasoma<br />

2-56


urophthalmus). Species such as the Sea Bream ( Archosargus rhomboidalis), the Sprat<br />

(Harengula clupeola) and the Thread Shad ( Dorosoma petenense) that are carnivorous<br />

zooplanktivores were also noted [See Table 2.5]. These fishes generally feed on minute<br />

inverteberates and larval fishes suspended in the water column [See Table 2.5].<br />

There were no ‘primary’ freshwater stocks found in the area. The freshwater stocks found were<br />

‘secondary’ and ‘peripheral’ species. The secondary freshwater stocks, which are species that are<br />

fundamentally <strong>of</strong> freshwater origin but with some evolutionary history associated with marine or<br />

brackish water, were limited in the area. These included the Crana (Cichlasoma urophthalmus),<br />

the Mosquito Fish (Gambusia luma) and the Alligator Fish (Belonesox belizanous) [See Table<br />

2.5]. The ‘peripheral’ freshwater stocks, which are marine species that are known to penetrate<br />

freshwater and low salinity environments, included the Bull Shark (Carcharhinus leucas), the<br />

Tarpon (Megalop atlanticus) and the Crevalle Jack (Caranx hippos) [See Table 2.5].<br />

The general area was also inhabited by euryhaline stocks and stenohaline marine species. The<br />

resident euryhaline stocks, which entails species that have adapted to live in brackish water<br />

somewhat permanently [Pers. comm. G. Myvett], includes: the Black Snapper ( Lutjanus<br />

buccanella) [See Table 2.4], the Common Snook (Centropomus undecimalis) [See Table 2.5],<br />

the Caitipa Mojarra (Diapterus rhombeus) [See Plate 2.24], and the White Mullet ( Mugil<br />

curema) [See Table 2.5]. The stenohaline stocks, which are marine species that have evolved in<br />

full-strength seawater and that are incapable <strong>of</strong> withstanding or adapting to low salinity waters or<br />

freshwater, include the Mackerel ( Scomberomorus maculatus), the Barracuda ( Sphyraena<br />

barracuda), and the Bluestriped Grunt (Haemulon sciurus).<br />

Table 2.4: Fish Species Found in Project Area<br />

Common Name Scientific Name Captured or<br />

Observed<br />

2-57<br />

Reported<br />

(Anecdotally)<br />

Common Snook Centropomus undecimalis √<br />

Sprat or Scaled<br />

Herring<br />

Harengula clupeola √<br />

Tarpon Megalop atlanticus √<br />

White Mullet<br />

(Mullet)<br />

Mugil curema √<br />

Blackfin Snapper<br />

(Black Snapper)<br />

Lutjanus buccanella √<br />

Gray Snapper Lutjanus griseus √<br />

Dog Snapper Lutjanus joco √<br />

Mahogany Snapper Lutjanus mahogoni √<br />

Crevalle Jack<br />

(Jack Cuballi)<br />

Caranx hippos √


Common Name Scientific Name Captured or Reported<br />

Observed (Anecdotally)<br />

Permit Selene vomer √<br />

Permit Trachinotus falcatus √<br />

Mackerel<br />

Scomberomorus<br />

√<br />

(Spanish Mackerel) maculates<br />

Barracuda Sphyraena barracuda √<br />

Jewfish Epinephelus itajara √<br />

Bluestriped Grunt Haemulon sciurus √<br />

Burro Grunt Pomadasys crocro √<br />

Bull Shark Carcharhinus leucas √<br />

Sting Ray<br />

(Tingre)<br />

Dasyatis Americana √<br />

Striped Mojarra<br />

(Stone Bass)<br />

Eugerres plumieri √<br />

Caitipa Mojarra<br />

(Mojarra)<br />

Diapterus rhombeus √<br />

Sea Bream Archosargus rhomboidalis √<br />

Southern<br />

Archosargus<br />

√<br />

Sheepshead probatocephalus<br />

Star Drum<br />

(Drummer)<br />

Stellifer colonensis √<br />

Threadfin Shad<br />

(Shad)<br />

Dorosoma petenense √<br />

Atlantic Spade Fish Chaetodipterus faber √<br />

Least Puffer<br />

(Mutruse)<br />

Sphoeroides nephelus √<br />

Needle Fish<br />

(Long Guard)<br />

Strongylura notata √<br />

Mayan Catfish<br />

(Catto)<br />

Ariopsis assimilis √<br />

Mayan Cichlid<br />

(Crana)<br />

Cichlasoma urophthalmus √<br />

Mosquito Fish Gambusia luma √<br />

Mexican Molly Poecilia mexicana √<br />

Alligator Fish Belonesox belizanous √<br />

2-58


Plate 2.24: Mayan Catfish – Ariopsis assimilis Plate 2.25: Gray Snapper – Lutjanus<br />

griseus<br />

Plate 2.26: [Top] Gray Snapper – Lutjanus Plate 2.27: Caitipa Mojarra – Diapterus<br />

griseus; [Bottom] Dog Snapper – Lutjanus rhombeus<br />

joco<br />

2-59


Plate 2.28: Mahogany Snapper – Lutjanus Plate 2.29: Sea Bream – Archosargus<br />

mahogoni rhomboidalis<br />

Plate 2.30: Burro Grunt – Pomadasys crocro Plate 2.31: Bluestriped Grunt –<br />

Haemulon sciurus<br />

2-60


Plate 2.32: [Top] Atlantic Spadefish, juvenile Plate 2.33: Gray Snapper - Lutjanus<br />

- Chaetodipterus faber; [Bottom] Atlantic griseus<br />

Spadefish adult – Chaetodipterus faber<br />

Plate 2.34: Lookdown – Selene vomer Plate 2.35: Blue Striped Grunt –<br />

Haemulon Sciurus<br />

2-61


Plate 2.36: Yellow Stingray – Urolophus Plate 2.37: Collection <strong>of</strong> fish sampled by<br />

jamaicensis Cast Nets<br />

Plate 2.38: Close-up <strong>of</strong> fish sampled by Cast Nets<br />

In general much <strong>of</strong> the stenohaline species were found and/or reported to be seen or harvested in<br />

the <strong>of</strong>f-shore areas or alternately in the nearshore areas <strong>of</strong> the primary coast or seashore proper.<br />

The <strong>of</strong>fshore waters are in general a part <strong>of</strong> the ‘shelf lagoon’ lying between the barrier reef<br />

platform and the mainland coast, and are for the most part undiluted or <strong>of</strong> ‘oceanic quality’,<br />

which is characterized by high salinity. T he salinity <strong>of</strong> the nearshore waters along the primary<br />

coast are influenced by two (2) opposite effects, viz the high salinity inputs from <strong>of</strong>fshore<br />

sources, and low salinity inputs or freshwater influences from upland areas.<br />

The high salinity influences in the nearshore areas depend on the season <strong>of</strong> the year, or more<br />

specifically the amount <strong>of</strong> freshwater run-<strong>of</strong>f impacting the area, and the specific phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

daily tides. During the rising tide, the nearshore areas is inundated by oceanic quality water with<br />

high saline content from the wider marine environment; during the falling tide these areas are<br />

influenced by the waters with relatively low salinities from the internal lagoonal systems <strong>of</strong> the<br />

overall Mid-Winters wetland system which are exiting the area through the outfall <strong>of</strong> the estuary.<br />

2-62


The degree <strong>of</strong> saline influences is dependent on the season <strong>of</strong> the year, with the greater<br />

freshwater or dilution influences accruing during the rainy season.<br />

In general the stenohaline oceanic species would inhabit the nearshore areas <strong>of</strong> the primary sea<br />

coast, the lower end <strong>of</strong> the internal lagoons and the area <strong>of</strong> the outfall <strong>of</strong> the estuary during the<br />

rising tide. Much <strong>of</strong> these stocks would be the larger predatory species such as the Permit<br />

(Trachinotus falcatus), the Mackerel (Scomberomorus maculatus) and the Barracuda (Sphyraena<br />

barracuda) [See Table 2.4].<br />

The areas <strong>of</strong> the outfall <strong>of</strong> the estuary and internal lagoons are inhabited by secondary freshwater<br />

species and euryhaline stocks such as the ‘Crana’ (Cichlasoma urophthalmus) [See Table 2.4],<br />

the ‘Catto’ (Ariopsis assimilis) [See Plate 2.21], and the Look Down (Selene vomer) [See Plate<br />

2.31] during the falling tides and in general during the rainy season. The secondary freshwater<br />

stocks that adapted to lower salinities and wholly freshwater systems include: the Mosquito Fish,<br />

the Mexican Molly and the Alligator Fish - these species are more prominent in the supra-tidal<br />

internal ponds <strong>of</strong> the mangrove system [Pers. comm.., G. Myvett].<br />

2.2.2.3 Other Vertebrate Fauna<br />

2.2.2.3.1 Amphibians<br />

Only three (3) species <strong>of</strong> Amphibians were found in the areas adjacent to the project corridor.<br />

These included the Marine toad ( Bufo marinus), the Common Mexican Tree Frog ( Similisca<br />

baudinii) and the Mexican White-lipped Tree Frog (Leptodactylus labialis) [See Table 2.6]. This<br />

paucity in species diversity is typical <strong>of</strong> mangrove-dominated areas.<br />

Table 2.5: Other Vertebrates Found or Reported in or around Project Area<br />

Common Name Scientific Name Observed During<br />

2-63<br />

Survey<br />

Reported<br />

Anecdotally<br />

Reptiles<br />

American Crocodile Crocodylus acutus √<br />

Morelet’s Crocodile Crocodylus moreleti √<br />

Black-bellied Turtle Rhinoclemys scripta √<br />

Narrowbridge Musk Turtle Claudius angustatus √<br />

Boa Constrictor Boa Constrictor √<br />

Black Tail<br />

Indigo<br />

Drymarchon corais √<br />

Green Vine Snake Oxybelis fulgidus √<br />

Green Tree Snake Leptophis ahaetulla √<br />

Central American Coral<br />

Snake<br />

Micrurus diastema √<br />

Striped Basilisk or Cock<br />

Maklala<br />

Basiliscus vittatus √<br />

Wish Willy or Spiny tailed<br />

Iguana<br />

Ctenosaura similes √


Common Name Scientific Name Observed During<br />

Survey<br />

Green Iguana Iguana iguana √<br />

2-64<br />

Reported<br />

Anecdotally<br />

Amphibians<br />

Marine Toad Bufo marinus √<br />

Mexican White-lipped Tree<br />

Frog<br />

Leptodactylus labialis √<br />

Common Mexican<br />

Treefrog<br />

Mammals<br />

Smilisca baudinii √<br />

West Indian Manatee Trichechus manatus √<br />

Bottle-nose Dolphin Tursiops truncatus √<br />

Gibnut Agouti paca √<br />

Mexican Porcupine Coendou mexicanus √<br />

Yucatan Squirrel Sciurus yucatanensis √<br />

Common Opossum Didelphis marsupialis √<br />

Raccoon Procyon lotor √<br />

Armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus √<br />

White-tailed Deer Odocoileus virginiana √<br />

Striped Hog-nosed Skunk Conepatus semistriatus √<br />

Quash or White nosed<br />

Coati<br />

Nasua narica √<br />

Grey Fox Urocyon cinereoargenteus √<br />

Northern Tamandua Tamandua mexicana √<br />

Kinkajou or<br />

Potos flavus √<br />

Night Walker<br />

Tayra or Bush Dog Eira barbara √<br />

Collared Peccary Tayassu tajacu √<br />

2.2.2.3.2 Reptiles<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> snakes and lizards, as well as turtles and crocodilians were also present in the areas<br />

adjacent to the project corridor. In the case <strong>of</strong> the latter, both the Morelet Crocodile (Crocodylus<br />

moreleti) and the American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) are known to inhabit the area [Table<br />

2.6]. The American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus) has been observed in the lower areas <strong>of</strong> Mid-<br />

Winters Lagoon near its junction with the sea. The Morelet Crocodile (Crocodylus moreleti) has<br />

been observed in the mangrove channels, ostensibly where there was a greater <strong>of</strong> freshwater<br />

inputs into its habitat.<br />

Familiar lizards in the area included the Cock Maklala or Jesus Christ Lizard ( Basiliscus<br />

vittatus), the Iguana (Iguana iguana) and the Wish Willy or Scaly Iguana (Ctenosaura similis).<br />

These animals were found throughout the ‘terrestrial’ range <strong>of</strong> habitat <strong>of</strong> the corridor.


The snakes that inhabit the area include the Boa Constrictor ( Boa Constrictor), Black Tail<br />

(Drymarchon corais), and the Green Tommy G<strong>of</strong>f (Leptophis ahaetulla) [See Table 2.6].<br />

2.2.2.3.3 Mammals<br />

The surrounding areas <strong>of</strong> Stage 1 <strong>of</strong> the project corridor are fairly rich in mammalian fauna.<br />

These included those associated with the mangrove and littoral forest environment such as the<br />

opossum (Didelphis marsupialis) and the Coati (Nasua narica) as well as those associated with<br />

pine ridge and open grassland such as the White-tailed Deer ( Odocoileus virginiana) and the<br />

Gray Fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) [See Table 2.6].<br />

Aquatic mammals were also reported in the general area. These included the Bottle-nose Dolphin<br />

(Tursiops truncatus) and the West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus) [See Table 2.6]. It is<br />

noteworthy to point out that the area has not been identified as being <strong>of</strong> any singular importance<br />

for the manatee (Trichechus manatus), relevant to for example the Belize City area and Corozal<br />

Bay.<br />

2.2.2.3.4 Birds<br />

Point counts and transect census <strong>of</strong> the proposed development site produced a total <strong>of</strong> (40)<br />

species <strong>of</strong> birds [See Table 2.7]. The birds were recorded during a (24) hour monitoring period.<br />

The bird surveys was conducted on the three main habitats identified on the property, they are<br />

Mangrove mixed with Littoral Forest, Coastline and Lagoon. The lagoon and coastline survey<br />

was done using a Fiber glass canoe and the Mangrove survey was done on foot. The results<br />

show that a number <strong>of</strong> North American migrants have arrived, and are using the adjacent areas to<br />

the project corridor as feeding and roosting grounds.<br />

Table 2.6: List <strong>of</strong> birds identified on the site<br />

Family Name Genus Species English Name Abundance,<br />

Seasonality<br />

Pelicans Pelecanus occidentalis Brown Pelican v-V<br />

Cormorants Phalacrocorax<br />

brasilianus<br />

Neotropic Cormorant v-P<br />

Frigate birds Fregata magnificens Magnificent Frigatebird v-V<br />

Herons & Egrets Ardea herodias Great Blue Heron c-V<br />

Ardea Alba Great Egret v-P<br />

Egretta caerulea Little Blue Heron v-W<br />

Egretta Tricolor Tricolored Heron c-V<br />

Butorides virescens Green Heron c-P<br />

Nyctanassa violacea Yellow Crowned Night<br />

Heron<br />

f-P<br />

Ibises Eudocimus albus White Ibis l-W<br />

Spoonbills Ajaia Ajaja Roseate Spoonbill f-W<br />

2-65


Family Name Genus Species English Name Abundance,<br />

Seasonality<br />

Vultures Coragyps atratus Black Vulture v-P<br />

Cathartes aura Turkey Vulture v-P<br />

Plovers Pluvialis squatarola Black-bellied Plover f-W<br />

Charadrius semipalmatus Semipalmated Plover f-W<br />

Chararius vociferus Killdeer f-W<br />

Stilts Himantopus mexicanus Black-necked Stilt l-P<br />

Sandpipers Tringa melanoleuca Greater Yellowlegs f-W<br />

Triga falvipes Solitary Sandpiper f-W<br />

Catoptrophorus<br />

Willet u-W<br />

semipalmatus<br />

Actitis macularia Spotted Sandpiper c-W<br />

Calidris pusilla Semipalmated Sandpiper l-TL<br />

Limnodromus griseus Short-billed Dowitcher f-W<br />

Gulls & Terns Larus atricilla Laughing Gull v-V<br />

Sterna caspia Caspian Tern f-W<br />

Sterna maxima Royal Tern c-V<br />

Pigeons &<br />

Doves<br />

Sterna sandvicensis Sandwich Tern v-V<br />

Columba cayennensis Pale-Vented Pigeon v-P<br />

Columba leucocephala White-Crowned Pigeon u-P<br />

Swift Panyptila cayennensis Lesser<br />

Swift<br />

Swallow-Tailed f-P<br />

Hummingbirds Anthracothorax prevostii Green-Breasted Mango u-P<br />

Woodpeckers Melanerpes aurifrons Golden-<br />

Woodpecker<br />

Fronted<br />

Flycatchers Pitangus sulphuratus Great Kiskadee v-P<br />

Myiozetetes similis Social Flycatcher v-P<br />

Tyrannus melancholicus Tropical Kingbird v-P<br />

Vireos Vireo pallens Mangrove Vireo c-P<br />

Swallows Tachycineta albilinea Mangrove Swallow c-P<br />

Mockingbirds Melanoptila glabrirostris Black Catbird l-P<br />

Mimus gilvus Tropical Mockingbird c-P<br />

2-66<br />

c-P


Key to symbols for Abundance:<br />

v = very common c = common f = fairly common u = uncommon<br />

r = rare o = occasional l = uncommon locally but absent in districts<br />

Key to symbols for Seasonality:<br />

P = Permanent Resident S = Seasonal Resident V = Visitor T = Transient<br />

W = Winter Resident X = Known from only two records.<br />

2.2.2.4 Methodology<br />

The methodologies employed for the result <strong>of</strong> the above surveys are delineated in Table 2.7B.<br />

The Reef Fish, Creature and Coral identification books by Human and deLoach were utilized to<br />

identify all marine life, while the bird list is arranged in accordance with the sequence and<br />

nomenclature <strong>of</strong> the American Ornithologist Union. The Key to Symbols for Abundance and<br />

Seasonality was adopted from Checklist <strong>of</strong> the Birds <strong>of</strong> Belize compiled by Lee Jones and A.C.<br />

Vallely, 2001.<br />

2-67


Table 2.6B: Summary <strong>of</strong> methodologies employed in characterization <strong>of</strong> bio-physical environment<br />

Subject Purpose Methodology Output<br />

Fin-Fish Census <strong>of</strong> species Snorkel survey <strong>of</strong> 6areas with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 100 m transects, List <strong>of</strong> species found, outlined<br />

characterization within project area which comprise <strong>of</strong> the entire project corridor. A diver tow<br />

method was also utilized at intervals in between the 7 selected<br />

in Table 2.4 (Fish)<br />

sites so as to encompass a wider survey area.<br />

Output is qualitative in<br />

Within the lagoonal area, due to depth and mud constraints,<br />

visual surface surveys were conducted.<br />

orientation<br />

Invertebrate Census <strong>of</strong> Epi- Snorkel survey <strong>of</strong> 6areas with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 100 m transects, List <strong>of</strong> species found, outlined<br />

characterization benthicmacro- which comprise <strong>of</strong> the entire project corridor. A diver tow in and Table 2.3 (Inverts)<br />

invertebrates method was also utilized at intervals in between the 7 selected<br />

sites so as to encompass a wider survey area.<br />

Output is qualitative in<br />

Within the lagoonal area, due to depth and mud constraints,<br />

visual surface surveys were conducted.<br />

orientation<br />

Aquatic and To record presence Engaging in 2 boat surveys <strong>of</strong> the project corridor comprising List <strong>of</strong> species and nature <strong>of</strong><br />

Semi-Aquatic <strong>of</strong> species within <strong>of</strong> a captain and spotter.<br />

environment in which found,<br />

Mammal and project area<br />

outlined in Table 2.6<br />

Reptile<br />

(Mammals) and Table 2.5<br />

characterization<br />

(Reptiles)<br />

Output is qualitative in<br />

orientation<br />

Aquatic Plant To record presence Snorkel survey <strong>of</strong> 6areas with a diameter <strong>of</strong> 100 m transects, List <strong>of</strong> species found, outlined<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> species in project which comprise <strong>of</strong> the entire project corridor. A diver tow in and Table 2.2B (Sub-Tidal))<br />

area<br />

method was also utilized at intervals in between the 7 selected<br />

sites so as to encompass a wider survey area.<br />

Output is qualitative in<br />

Within the lagoonal area, due to depth and mud constraints,<br />

visual surface surveys were conducted<br />

orientation<br />

Bird<br />

To record presence Conduct sea, lagoon and land based surveys along the coast, List <strong>of</strong> species found, outlined<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> species in project encompassing the fringing mangroves areas, and the project in and Table 2.7 (Birds))<br />

area<br />

corridor.<br />

Output is qualitative in<br />

orientation<br />

2-68


2.3 Conservation Issues<br />

The conservation issues in regards to the proposed undertaking relates to both conservation areas<br />

and species <strong>of</strong> special interest. The Hol Chan Marine Reserve is one <strong>of</strong> the oldest and most<br />

visited Marine Reserve [See Fig. 2.18]. Relatedly, in terms <strong>of</strong> the issue <strong>of</strong> ‘conservation area’<br />

status, some <strong>of</strong> the neighbouring marine areas have been identified as important recruitment and<br />

nursery sites for a number <strong>of</strong> economically viable species.<br />

There is also the Bacalar Chico Marine Reserve and National Park, The Caye Caulker Marine<br />

Reserve and National Park and the Swallow Cayes Wildlife Sanctuary which are either in close<br />

proximity or relative to the development site [See Fig. 2.18]. Taking this into consideration the<br />

developers <strong>of</strong> this project have ensured that all conservation issues are addressed to the fullest.<br />

As a matter <strong>of</strong> fact, it is these same resources that attract the end users to the Country, thus to the<br />

development being proposed will provide service to encompass hotels, villas, private homes and<br />

much more.<br />

It is therefore, <strong>of</strong> utmost importance that the project not degrades the environment to a state that<br />

it will diminish the resources that already exists within the area.<br />

2.3.1 Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Special Significance<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> threatened and endangered species. These include sea turtles, crocodiles,<br />

marine mammals and birds.<br />

The sea turtles <strong>of</strong> relevance are the Green Turtle ( Chelonia mydas), the Hawksbill Turtle<br />

(Eretmochelys imbricata), and the Loggerhead ( Caretta caretta). There are no documented<br />

nesting sites <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> these species in the project corridor.<br />

The Hawksbill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) is listed in the CITES Regulations which means<br />

that the species is threatened with extinction and is or would be affected by trade. Trade in the<br />

Hawksbill ( Eretmochelys imbricata) in compliance with the goals <strong>of</strong> the convention, must be<br />

accompanied by the strictest <strong>of</strong> regulations to ensure that the species is not further imperiled, and<br />

should only be authorized under exceptional circumstances. The Fisheries Regulations were<br />

strengthened in 2003 in regards to the Hawksbill ( Eretmochelys imbricata) and sea turtles in<br />

general: SI 66 <strong>of</strong> 2002, Reg. 2 prohibits the harvesting <strong>of</strong> sea turtles.<br />

Prior to this amendment in the Fisheries Act, harvest was regulated by size limits and closed<br />

season. In addition to the issue <strong>of</strong> the harvesting and trade, the nesting sites the Hawks Bill<br />

Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) are also protected. SI 66 <strong>of</strong> 2002 Reg. 3 prohibits the taking <strong>of</strong><br />

turtle eggs or the interference with any nesting site(s). The CITES listing <strong>of</strong> the Hawksbill<br />

(Eretmochelys imbricata) and the follow-on national legislations derives from a recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

the reduced number <strong>of</strong> individuals in the wild and the inferred or projected continuation in the<br />

decline <strong>of</strong> the population. The perceived decline and degradation <strong>of</strong> the habitat <strong>of</strong> Turtle was also<br />

a valid consideration in relation to the subscription to principles <strong>of</strong> CITES and the consequent<br />

strengthening national legislations.<br />

2-69


The proposed project will not in any way impact or erode the integrity <strong>of</strong> the nesting sites or<br />

aquatic habitat <strong>of</strong> the Hawks Bill (Eretmochelys imbricata), or indeed in any way to contribute to<br />

any perceived or real decline in the abundance or distribution <strong>of</strong> the species. Apart from the<br />

CITES Designation and national legislation, the Hawks Bill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) is<br />

listed as “Critically Endangered” by IUCN.<br />

The Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) is also listed in CITES. All <strong>of</strong> the provisions relating to the<br />

Hawks Bill Turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) in regard to CITES as well as national legislations<br />

also apply to the species. Allowances are made however for the utilization <strong>of</strong> the Green Turtle<br />

for cultural reasons: SI 66 <strong>of</strong> 2002 Reg. #5 stipulates that permission can be obtained from the<br />

Fisheries Administrator for those parties that would qualify. It has been reported to be taken<br />

occasionally by fishermen in <strong>of</strong>fshore areas. Apart from the CITES Designation and national<br />

legislation, the Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas) is listed as “Endangered” by IUCN.<br />

The American Crocodile ( Crocodylus acutus) was not seen during the survey efforts by the<br />

Tunich-Nah Team, however, sitings have been reported throughout the year due to the fact that<br />

its ecological range certainly embraces the area. The American Crocodile (Crocodylus acutus)<br />

has in fact been reported to range all along the Belizean coast and coastal lagoons, including the<br />

islands that are situated between the mainland and the barrier reef. The American Crocodile<br />

(Crocodylus acutus) has been listed in Appendix I <strong>of</strong> the CITES Regulations. The Forest Act<br />

also prohibits the hunting or exploitation <strong>of</strong> this species otherwise. The American Crocodile<br />

(Crocodylus acutus) has been listed as “Vulnerable” by IUCN. The proposed project is in no<br />

way designed to destroy, erode or to otherwise negatively impact the populations <strong>of</strong> crocodiles<br />

that may be found in the area.<br />

Manatees (Trichechus manatus) have been reported generally in all areas around the projects site<br />

including the barrier lagoon. The Tunich-Nah Survey Team did not have documented sightings<br />

in the project area during the site-specific survey. The latest aerial surveys by the CZMA/I also<br />

identified all areas around the project area and the barrier lagoon in front <strong>of</strong> the site as a habitat<br />

for manatees. The presence <strong>of</strong> manatees (Trichechus manatus) in the project area may be as a<br />

result <strong>of</strong> the fact that the area is thoroughfare for manatees to reach their prime habitat located in<br />

the swallows caye area, <strong>of</strong> which was declared a sanctuary for the species. The Manatee<br />

(Trichechus manatus) has been listed in Appendix I <strong>of</strong> the CITES Regulations. The Manatee<br />

(Trichechus manatus) has been listed as “Vulnerable” in the IUCN Registry <strong>of</strong> species.<br />

In the zoological report for the “National Protected Areas Systems Plan for Belize” [Miller and<br />

Miller, 1995], mention was made <strong>of</strong> the vulnerability <strong>of</strong> the Black Catbird ( Melanoptila<br />

glabrirostris). This bird is a regional endemic species with a narrow range that is limited to the<br />

east coast <strong>of</strong> the Yucatan and northeastern Belize [Phillips, 1986].<br />

American Crocodile – The range <strong>of</strong> the American Crocodile (C. acutus) extends from Central<br />

Mexico and South Florida to Northern South America and the Caribbean Islands. This specie had<br />

been exterminated over most <strong>of</strong> its range and although it appears to be on the rebound the<br />

evidence is too tenuous to warrant a re-designation at this time.<br />

2-70


In Belize, there is general confusion over the identification <strong>of</strong> this specie and C. Moreletti<br />

resulting in frequent misidentifications. In general C. acutus is found along the coast and<br />

<strong>of</strong>fshore cayes, while C. moreletti is most <strong>of</strong>ten associated with inland waterways. To compound<br />

this confusion, the population <strong>of</strong> C. moreletti appears to be rebounding faster than C. acutus and<br />

may be invading traditional parts <strong>of</strong> its range. As a result a sympatric association with C. acutus<br />

has evolved (Platt and Montanucci, 1993).<br />

It has even been suggested that there may be miscegenation between the two species, resulting in<br />

hybridized <strong>of</strong>fspring (Thorbjarnarson, 1994; Platt, 1994). Crocodiles have always inspired fear<br />

in people who have an innate fear <strong>of</strong> being preyed upon or losing domestic animals to the<br />

feeding habits <strong>of</strong> this animal.<br />

With effective conservation measures, populations have shown a remarkable capacity to<br />

rebound. Indeed C. moreletti is now ubiquitous in Belize, penetrating even into densely<br />

populated areas, in the process raising the ire <strong>of</strong> the citizenry, who consider it a threat and are<br />

calling for firm measures to control its populations.<br />

Sea Turtle ( Chelonia midas, Eretmochelys imbricata, Caretta caretta) - Although all six<br />

species that are protected by the Fisheries Regualtions pass through the territorial waters <strong>of</strong><br />

Belize on their annual migratory routes, three species stand out as known endemic species, their<br />

names indelibly etched in the popular imagination, having earned their place within the fishing<br />

industry and <strong>of</strong>fshoot industries which depended on their exploitation. In the IUCN Red Listing<br />

for 2000 all three species, Green Turtle (Chelonia mydas), Hawksbill (Eretmochelys imbricata)<br />

and Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) were listed as endangered.<br />

Every year throughout the Caribbean thousands <strong>of</strong> these turtles are accidentally killed in<br />

abandoned nets and other fishing gear, while untold others have been deprived <strong>of</strong> traditional<br />

nesting sites due to coastal developments and the destruction <strong>of</strong> feeding habitats (UNDP, 1995).<br />

Still others are threatened by oil spills and chemical seepage into the coastal environment.<br />

In Belize, turtle numbers have experienced a continuous decline under pressures <strong>of</strong> over<br />

harvesting as evidenced by the decline in number <strong>of</strong> catch per unit effort and the readily<br />

observed decrease in the average weight <strong>of</strong> the landed catch (60% from 1982 to 1986) (CZMAI,<br />

1995).<br />

Hawksbills are the most endangered <strong>of</strong> the resident sea turtles, (IUCN listed as critically<br />

endangered), preferring instead the southern waters <strong>of</strong> Belize. The specie however, depends on<br />

the entire reef system <strong>of</strong> Belize for its survival, where it forages extensively on seagrass beds and<br />

coral reefs.<br />

Important threats to sea turtles are, beach erosion, native predators, feral animals and wading<br />

birds, <strong>of</strong>fshore predators and the disease fibropapilloma (Smith et. al., 1992). Illegal collection<br />

and sale <strong>of</strong> eggs also take their toll as does collisions into motorboats and drowning in nets.<br />

Other hazards can be found on the beach. These include construction <strong>of</strong> sea walls and dredging<br />

works plus hatchling disorientation from artificial lights, which may prevent them reaching the<br />

sea.<br />

2-71


Manatees ( Trichechus manatus) - Belize is reputed to have the largest concentration (not<br />

population) <strong>of</strong> manatees <strong>of</strong> all the countries which are inhabited by the Caribbean Manatee<br />

(Trichechus manatus). After a reduction in numbers in 1996 following a mystery disease that<br />

killed some 200 manatees it now appears that the numbers are on the rebound.<br />

In the aerial surveys conducted in 1995, the survey team obtained an index <strong>of</strong> relative abundance<br />

(IRA) <strong>of</strong> 12.48 manatees per hour <strong>of</strong> reconnaissance effort. In the January 1999 survey the IRA<br />

value had increased to 27.81 manatees per hour <strong>of</strong> effort (CZMAI, 1999). The same 1999 survey<br />

resulted in the highest number <strong>of</strong> calf sightings ever recorded in Belize. More significantly, the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> calf sightings per total manatee observed in the dry and wet season was 13% and<br />

12.32% respectively. This number was significantly higher than the 7% usually taken to indicate<br />

a healthy and growing manatee population (Rathbun et. al. 1991).<br />

This however should not be cause for complacency. In 1999 there were 19 reported manatee<br />

strandings <strong>of</strong> which 36% were human induced while 41% were complications <strong>of</strong> reproduction<br />

such as aborting <strong>of</strong> calves, abandonment etc. The remainder succumbed to poachers and boat<br />

propellers, while the cause <strong>of</strong> death for others could not be determined due to the advanced state<br />

<strong>of</strong> decomposition <strong>of</strong> the carcasses.<br />

Major efforts are underway nationally to cut down on the mortality rates <strong>of</strong> manatees and to<br />

improve on their monitoring and surveillance. The CZMAI had a collaborative project with the<br />

Wildlife Preservation Trust International to tag manatees and to track them using satellite<br />

technology. There has also been created an organization called the Belize Marine Mammal<br />

Stranding Network, which is a group dedicated to the study and conservation <strong>of</strong> marine<br />

mammals.<br />

The network consists <strong>of</strong> 4 district teams augmented by localized sub-teams, who operate in<br />

specific areas and a group <strong>of</strong> veterinarians who are available to <strong>of</strong>fer their services. This network<br />

gives the CZMAI area coverage and expertise in every major coastal region <strong>of</strong> the country<br />

enabling quick response to manatee stranding emergencies. Manatees have been reported from<br />

the back reef lagoon area <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye, although this area in general does not appear to be<br />

prime manatee habitat. In the 1999 aerial survey an adult and 2 calves were sighted in the<br />

Chetumal Bay but none were recorded near the San Pedro area <strong>of</strong> the project corridor.<br />

2.3.2 Conservation Areas<br />

In the Belize District, marine, coastal and terrestrial influences converge to create a complex and<br />

productive ecosystem. This ecosystem is a crucial component in the list <strong>of</strong> attractions that keeps<br />

visitors coming to Belize and has helped to propel this region to the forefront <strong>of</strong> the national<br />

tourism industry. Unfortunately this initial success has resulted in an accelerated pace <strong>of</strong><br />

development that now threatens the viability <strong>of</strong> the very ecosystem that made Belize a tourist<br />

attraction in the first place.<br />

This trend shows no signs <strong>of</strong> abating any time soon although its deleterious effects have not gone<br />

unnoticed. Conservation minded individuals and organization have pushed for initiatives to<br />

protect other areas <strong>of</strong> the coastal and some inland areas, and to incorporate them within the<br />

2-72


National Protected Areas System. Although all are well aware <strong>of</strong> the need for concerted action<br />

on the environmental front, and are doing their part, the establishment <strong>of</strong> these protected areas<br />

puts their management on a more solid footing ensuring that their carrying capacity is not<br />

breached, and “secures” their long term viability.<br />

2.3.3 Social Environment<br />

The social impact that the proposed project site will have on the receiving environment and<br />

surrounding community is considered as both beneficial and detrimental. There must be a<br />

balance between the impacts in order for the proposed project to get underway. It is anticipated<br />

that the development will provide economic opportunities on the longer run. The following<br />

sections describe the social assessment.<br />

2.3.3.1 Introduction<br />

Projects in the coastal marine ecosystems always produce impacts that result in temporary and<br />

permanent changes in the environment, traditional/ cultural resources and recreational uses, as<br />

well as introduce ethnic and demographical migration and dispersion. These projects modify the<br />

social and cultural environments; depending on the size and type <strong>of</strong> the project, they create or<br />

enhance economic, health, education and other benefits that are valued by society. Projects can<br />

also enhance positively the entrepreneurial and service industries, supply and demand <strong>of</strong><br />

construction materials, demand for cultural entertainment, <strong>of</strong>fer employment, etc. Social<br />

infrastructure on a whole will be impacted as this project will address the needs <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong><br />

Ambergris Caye residents, visitors and workers. The traditional users (fishers and tourism<br />

ventures) <strong>of</strong> the biological and physical resources <strong>of</strong> the area may be the most affected if<br />

mitigation measures are not addressed adequately.<br />

The proposed btl project targets the business’ that require a fast, reliable and easy means to<br />

infiltrate North American and European markets <strong>of</strong> retirees and tourists, as well as the<br />

educational system. Additionally, it will aid in local reception, by increasing the ranges <strong>of</strong> the<br />

mobile phone, and allowing real time downloading <strong>of</strong> programs such as the nightly news etc.<br />

This project has been programmed to be completed in three stages over a 15 week period. On<br />

the positive side, the project will create an increase in the demand for goods and services, such as<br />

transportation, marine and agricultural commodities, skilled labour and unskilled labour, as<br />

required with any project <strong>of</strong> this nature. It is expected, at its inception, and throughout the life <strong>of</strong><br />

the project, that it will create long-term economic employment and investment opportunities for<br />

the area, the region, and the country on a whole.<br />

The assessment identifies, analyzes, and evaluates those social impacts the proposed project may<br />

have on individuals, social groups, traditional users, and other social users <strong>of</strong> the area during the<br />

construction phase and final development phase.<br />

While the proposed project to be undertaken does have both positive and negative social impacts,<br />

the foreseen positive impacts for the local community and the region include increased<br />

2-73


employment opportunities, potential for additional local entrepreneurial initiatives, increased<br />

regional economic spin-<strong>of</strong>f for local businesses.<br />

Benefits will mostly accrue to the tourism industry. Additional positive impacts would be<br />

realized if a number <strong>of</strong> proposed environmental and community benefit options are adopted.<br />

Likely negative social impacts include traditional user accesses, increased water traffic in and to<br />

the area, increased noise, and to some degree, night lighting impacts on the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area.<br />

2.3.3.2 Health Services<br />

Potential Impacts<br />

Pressure on health facilities by migrant worker populations<br />

Existing health facilities are inadequate to serve large groups <strong>of</strong> migrant workers as these<br />

services are already limited in the area and region.<br />

Mitigation Measures<br />

Locals can become marginalized during all phases <strong>of</strong> installation depending on the level and<br />

needs for existing services. Due to the time frame <strong>of</strong> the project, there will be no long term need<br />

for Health services. Access to health services will be provided by the developer to either Belize<br />

City or San Pedro. However, on a positive note, due to the time frame <strong>of</strong> the project, the<br />

pressure will be for a short period <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

2.3.3.3 Labor and Employment<br />

Potential Impacts<br />

Skilled labor from the area not employed<br />

Employment opportunities <strong>of</strong> all labor types<br />

Operators <strong>of</strong> equipment and machinery not fully trained<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the size and needs <strong>of</strong> the project, it is anticipated that the project will employ small<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> workers as well as other technical expertise not available in the immediate area.<br />

Mitigation Measures<br />

Employment <strong>of</strong> individuals from the area is encouraged to strengthen local community and<br />

regional skills. Locals will learn skills in all labor types. Developers should abide by the Labor<br />

Laws <strong>of</strong> Belize<br />

2-74


Worker populations should be provided with adequate services and facilities such as drinking<br />

water, basic sanitary services, and safety equipment. Workers should be trained in safety<br />

procedures. Skills transfer will be encouraged.<br />

2.3.3.4 Economic Impact<br />

Potential Impact<br />

increased temporary employment<br />

increase in business sales and products and pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

During installation stages, there will be increased employment in the nearby villages and San<br />

Pedro. Indirect economic impact will also see a domino effect with increases in sales <strong>of</strong> services<br />

and products in the area <strong>of</strong> influence. Internet services sold at the resorts, cafes etc will also<br />

further increase incomes and pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> which a proportion will be re-spent in the local economy.<br />

Additionally, economic benefits will be generated by direct expenditure <strong>of</strong> additional visitors to<br />

the country utilizing our resources, e.g. tours and bus operators, visitations to the various sites<br />

and auxiliary services such arts and crafts, souvenirs, food and beverage, taxi service and other<br />

popular products.<br />

2.3.3.5 Project Activities<br />

Potential Impacts<br />

Transportation <strong>of</strong> materials<br />

Safety <strong>of</strong> workers<br />

Access to the area <strong>of</strong> the proposed project<br />

The location and size <strong>of</strong> the project activities for the most part are tw<strong>of</strong>old. One is on land where<br />

the FOC will be installed on existing BEL poles, while the other is the cable burial from the<br />

coast on mainland to the coast at San Pedro. During the installation stages, trucks, boats and<br />

barges will be hired to bring in materials to the project corridor, which based on the project, will<br />

change on a daily basis.<br />

Mitigation Measures<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the location and size <strong>of</strong> the project, transportation <strong>of</strong> materials and equipment should<br />

be planned in advance so that it does not coincide or disrupt traditional marine route users.<br />

The safety <strong>of</strong> workers during and after all phases should be built into project design.<br />

2.3.3.6 Disturbances (Noise/Dust)<br />

Potential Impacts<br />

Operation <strong>of</strong> machinery and equipment<br />

2-75


Disturbance from dust and smoke to neighboring facilities <strong>of</strong> the project corridor<br />

Potential air pollution from boats<br />

Construction activities may create problems with dust, noise, emission and vibration generated<br />

by construction equipment, vehicular traffic, work vessels and other similar sources. As there<br />

are no nearby communities to the project site, these impacts will affect only the construction<br />

workers at the site.<br />

Mitigation Measures<br />

Transmission <strong>of</strong> dust, noise and vibration are limited by the distance from their sources. Noise<br />

could be considerably reduced by adoption <strong>of</strong> low noise equipment. One <strong>of</strong> the main methods for<br />

controlling dust emission is water scattering along the project corridor.<br />

Air pollutants from boats are generally not yet regulated. To reduce the boat emissions, the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> type-C heavy diesel oil is recommended.<br />

2.3.3.7 Visual Impacts<br />

Potential Impact<br />

Visual impact <strong>of</strong> the project corridor and the shoreline and related lighting by vessels on<br />

the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> the area<br />

The likely visual impact in the area <strong>of</strong> the proposed project would be the extent <strong>of</strong> additional<br />

night lighting such as bright lights that can affect the local flora and fauna <strong>of</strong> the area.<br />

Mitigation Measures<br />

Mitigation measures include shielding <strong>of</strong> lighting systems that will minimize the intensity <strong>of</strong><br />

light emissions on the shorelines <strong>of</strong> the mainland, lagoon and the sea. Additionally, the buoys<br />

will be lighted and the vessel lights will only be short term.<br />

2.3.3.8 Marine Traffic<br />

Potential Impacts<br />

Increased number <strong>of</strong> boats to the area<br />

Increased number <strong>of</strong> marine vessels to the area and the region<br />

Disruption <strong>of</strong> traditional user activities to the area<br />

Disruption <strong>of</strong> traditional transportation route<br />

Site development activities will have major effect on existing marine traffic. However, all user<br />

activities to the area will need to be mitigated.<br />

2-76


Mitigation Measures<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> all marine traffic through and near the area will be regulated and management systems<br />

such as buoys and markers will be positioned and fitted to facilitate day and night vessels and<br />

users to the area. All marine vessels should be serviced and maintained in proper working<br />

condition. During all phases <strong>of</strong> construction the developers should maintain open<br />

communication with all users <strong>of</strong> the area whether marine or land based.<br />

During marine phase <strong>of</strong> the project activities, alternate routes should be established for regular<br />

local cargo; safety measures should also be established for all users and workers. Areas <strong>of</strong><br />

activity for traditional users should be avoided. All (types) materials transported over water (as<br />

necessary) should be properly covered.<br />

All these issues are further discussed in the Impacts section <strong>of</strong> the document.<br />

2.3.4 Regional Demographics and Population Related Issues<br />

The Belize District is among the four larger districts in size with an area <strong>of</strong> 1,663sq. miles. The<br />

2000 Population Census showed the district had a population <strong>of</strong> 68,827 representing 20.0% <strong>of</strong><br />

the total population <strong>of</strong> Belize (240,204) and a population density <strong>of</strong> 28.9 per square mile. The<br />

mid-year estimate for 2007 for the district population is 93,200 (29.92% <strong>of</strong> country total estimate<br />

<strong>of</strong> 311,500) and a density <strong>of</strong> 56.1 per sq. mile. The national population density in 2000 and 2007<br />

figures were 28.2 and 35.1 per square mile, respectively.<br />

In 2007, the population <strong>of</strong> the entire district was 93,200 with 45,300 males and 47,900 females.<br />

In discussions which most community leaders, it is reported that there are 18,000 to 22,000<br />

people living in San Pedro in 2008 <strong>of</strong> which approximately 18,000-19,000 are residents. This is<br />

twice the population estimated by the Belize Institute <strong>of</strong> Statistics for mid-2007. It was also<br />

noted that there are only 5,600 registered voters, less than one third, <strong>of</strong> this total residents<br />

This district had a growth rate <strong>of</strong> 19.6% over this last inter-census period (1991-2000) while San<br />

Pedro had a growth rate <strong>of</strong> 143.3% over the same period.<br />

In 1960, there were 600 persons living in San Pedro and by 2000, 40 years later, there were<br />

4,500 which represents over a 750% increase. Between 2000 and 2008, there has been a 231%<br />

increase in population, according to the BIS figures and 44.4% according to community leaders.<br />

San Pedro is one <strong>of</strong> the fastest growing municipality in Belize and this can create problems in the<br />

use <strong>of</strong> the resources <strong>of</strong> the island and its surrounding fragile ecosystems such as the reef, the<br />

mangroves and lagoons on the west side <strong>of</strong> the island.<br />

2-77


Table 2.8 National Population by District, Mid-year Estimates 2007<br />

DISTRICT Area in Sq. MALE FEMALE TOTAL % <strong>of</strong> Population<br />

Miles<br />

Total Density<br />

COROZAL 718 18,150 18,215 36,365 11.6 50.6<br />

ORANGE<br />

WALK<br />

1,790 23,985 23,160 47,145 14.8 26,3<br />

BELIZE 1,663 45,335 47,880 93,215 30.5 56.1<br />

CAYO 2,006 36,340 26,147 36,985 23.6 36.5<br />

STANN<br />

CREEK<br />

986 16,360 15,820 32,180 10.1 32.6<br />

TOLEDO 1704 14,495 14,755 29,250 9.4 17.2<br />

COUNTRY<br />

TOTAL<br />

8,867 154,665 156,815 311,480 35.1<br />

Abstracts <strong>of</strong> Statistics, 2007 (February)<br />

A brief description <strong>of</strong> San Pedro Town follows:<br />

San Pedro Town<br />

San Pedro Town was developed by the clearing <strong>of</strong> mangroves and sand dunes for settlement<br />

establishment by the Mestizos fleeing from Bacalar, Quintana Roo, Mexico in the 1850s during<br />

the Caste War. The higher grounds <strong>of</strong> the island were cleared for subsistence farming in the past<br />

and later for coconut cultivation for copra production. Commercial fishing was vibrant during the<br />

1960s when the Caribeña Fishing Cooperative was the main intermediary to export fish, conch,<br />

lobster and shrimp. Since the mid-1970s, tourism development began and opened the real estate<br />

sector which is flourishing today; there are approximately ten realtors in San Pedro Town today.<br />

It is estimated that only 40% <strong>of</strong> the current population <strong>of</strong> 18,000 to 20,000 are the original San<br />

Pedranos with the remaining 60% being from other districts. The issue <strong>of</strong> the migrant population<br />

integrating into the traditional San Pedro society has been rather smooth, even with an increase<br />

in crime that is now becoming common all over Belize. Those who come for seasonal<br />

employment only have learned to adapt to the rhythm <strong>of</strong> life in the island. Their income levels<br />

determine the type <strong>of</strong> housing they can rent and the schools and health services they can use.<br />

Those who are pr<strong>of</strong>essionals (teachers, nurses, etc.) or skilled labor (mechanics, carpenters,<br />

plumbers, etc) do have a better standard <strong>of</strong> living.<br />

The main economic activities <strong>of</strong> the residents <strong>of</strong> this town are tourism businesses, many services<br />

and lobster fishing by some 25 fishers who also are involved in tourism. Their main concerns<br />

were:<br />

the project’s activity, namely the sediment plume, is too close to Hol Chan and the<br />

activities may “destroy the main attractions ( Hol Chan, Shark Alley and sport fishing) <strong>of</strong><br />

the island; once Hol Chan is destroyed the tourists will not come to San Pedro thus<br />

resulting in total economic loss;<br />

2-78


impact <strong>of</strong> activities to this area <strong>of</strong> flats where most <strong>of</strong> the sports fishing is done by the<br />

tour guides;<br />

the activities will destroy the habitat for the three important species <strong>of</strong> sport fish, namely<br />

bone fish, permit and tarpon;<br />

The sedimentation can affect the juveniles <strong>of</strong> the three main sport fishing species and also<br />

others such as snook, jewfish and cubera snapper;<br />

the noise <strong>of</strong> the project will “scare and chase” the important sport fishing species and will<br />

destroy the sea grass beds in the lagoon and probably even affect corals on the reef;<br />

the resulting sedimentation <strong>of</strong> fine silt can possibly affect spawning aggregation sites,<br />

especially for lobster;<br />

displacement <strong>of</strong> sport fishers from their current tour guiding grounds due to the project<br />

activities thus resulting in loss <strong>of</strong> their traditional livelihood;<br />

the project may cause restriction <strong>of</strong> traffic to fishers; a buffer area may be “buoyed <strong>of</strong>f” to<br />

prevent fishers and tour guides from using the areas close to the corridor;<br />

the increased boat traffic during installation phase will create bilge pollution;<br />

While the stakeholders made it clear that they are not against the project, they want to see that all<br />

protocols (permits and other GOB requirements) are followed. They also want this type <strong>of</strong><br />

development to follow the Coastal Zone Development Guidelines that were developed by the<br />

Coastal Zone Management Authority and Institute during operation.<br />

2.3.5 Social Infrastructure and Services<br />

2.3.5.1 Labor and Employment<br />

The Belize District and especially San Pedro is highly dependent on several activities such as:<br />

tourism, small farm agriculture, manufacturing and services, and some fishing. Tourism visitors<br />

to the Belize District and San Pedro are attracted for its cayes, the Belize Barrier Reef close to<br />

San Pedro and Caye Caulker, Altun Ha archaeological site and its world re-knowned Blue Hole.<br />

National employment rate in 2005 was 89.0% and in 2007 it was 91.5%. In the Belize District,<br />

the comparative employment figures were 88% % in 2005 and 91 % in 2007. Male employment<br />

for the 2005-2007 accounts for four points less than that <strong>of</strong> females during the same period. The<br />

unemployed rate for women was higher than that <strong>of</strong> males in 2005-2006 but was reversed in<br />

2007 with only 48.2% <strong>of</strong> women unemployed. The proposed development will contribute to the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the tourism industry in the district and the country in general.<br />

2-79


There may be the need to give on-the-job training to some <strong>of</strong> these unskilled job seekers while it<br />

is also expected that skilled workers would come from outside <strong>of</strong> the country to fill in the jobs<br />

that require skilled expertise related to the project.<br />

In 2007, employment in the Belize District by these industries in 2007 is as follows:<br />

Table 2.10 Employment Data in the Belize District during 2005-2007<br />

Employment Situation Total Male % Female %<br />

Employed- 2005<br />

Employed- 2006<br />

Employed- 2007<br />

Unemployed-2005<br />

Unemployed- 2006<br />

Unemployed- 2007<br />

Source: Labour Force Survey by BIS in 2007<br />

58,996<br />

61,891<br />

65,001<br />

4,387<br />

3,099<br />

3,729<br />

2.3.5.2 Communication and Cable TV Services<br />

2-80<br />

27,651<br />

29,711<br />

31,666<br />

1,832<br />

1,275<br />

1,930<br />

46.9<br />

48.0<br />

48.7<br />

41.8<br />

41.2<br />

51.8<br />

31,344<br />

32,180<br />

33,335<br />

2,555<br />

1,824<br />

1,799<br />

53.1<br />

5<strong>2.0</strong><br />

51.3<br />

58.2<br />

58.8<br />

48.2<br />

Communication and services are well established in the area with public and private telephones,<br />

fixed and mobile cellular phones, fax and email, and internet facilities. However, the goal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

project is to provide faster, real-time and more reliable 24-hour communication services. San<br />

Pedro has only one cable television provider, Coral Cable Vision, and they seem amenable to the<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> utilizing the services <strong>of</strong> the project.<br />

2.3.5.3 Transportation Routes and Options<br />

The project corridor and surroundings can be reached by boat or road. The traditional sea routes<br />

used to transport mainly cargo to and from San Pedro are close to the project corridor. The routes<br />

for the transportation <strong>of</strong> cargo to and from the island are already set by the traditional cargo<br />

shipping agents or businesses. It should be noted that this is the same route used by the sugar<br />

barges coming from Tower Hill through the New River and the Corozal Bay. Safety issues need<br />

to be put in place to prevent accidents on this route.<br />

2.3.6 Economic Activities in the Area<br />

The following economic activities are currently being undertaken on the island.<br />

2.3.6.1 Tourism Activities<br />

In 2007, <strong>of</strong> the ten destinations identified by the BTB, the Belize District placed first in number<br />

<strong>of</strong> hotels and rooms, in number <strong>of</strong> beds, in number <strong>of</strong> tour operators and in number <strong>of</strong> tour<br />

guides. Comparing 2005 and 2007 tourism statistics between the San Pedro and Maskall/Bomba<br />

destination and the rest <strong>of</strong> country, San Pedro as well as Belize rural North has grown at very<br />

high rates in the tourism industry. The numbers <strong>of</strong> hotels, rooms and tour guides have had a


slightly higher growth rate than the national figures. There was a decrease in the number <strong>of</strong> tour<br />

operators and a slight increase in the number <strong>of</strong> tour guides.<br />

The number <strong>of</strong> employees in the hotel sub-sector has increased by 25% while the national figures<br />

have decreased by 15% between those years. While these figures are good indicators for the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> investment, the BTB does not have segregated visitation figures for each <strong>of</strong> the ten<br />

destinations being monitored in order to determine market share. During the period compared,<br />

there has been an increase <strong>of</strong> 8% contribution to GDP and a 6% increase in overnight visitors<br />

while the country experienced a 22% decrease in cruise visitors.<br />

2.3.6.2 Fishing Activities<br />

The fishing activity in San Pedro and surrounding areas has been drastically reduced in volume<br />

and value since the 1970’s when there were approximately 136 fishers and members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Caribeña Fishermen Cooperative Society and who were mostly engaged in lobster, conch,<br />

shrimp and scale fish. Today there are only 15-20 members who are solely involved in lobster<br />

fishing. Today over 90% percent <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong> the fishing cooperative are involved totally<br />

in the tourism sector as tour guides, specifically in the sport fishing sub-sector. Even some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

older fishers are being trained this year to do sports fishing.<br />

The total catch in 2007 was between 15-20,000 lbs <strong>of</strong> tail which were sold to the National<br />

Fishing Cooperative Society in Belize City for processing and export. The local tourism market<br />

also buys tails from the individual fishers and the Cooperative outlet for their daily consumption.<br />

The lobster is caught with traps and shade devices while the conch is caught with hooks. The<br />

project corridor and nearby surrounding areas are not a major fishery site, but may be affected by<br />

the project activities. In the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the proposed development, it was reported that there were<br />

only four older fishers, not engaged in the tourism sector, who are still involved in trapping scale<br />

fish for home use and the local market.<br />

As mentioned earlier, the area in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the proposed development are the Bulkhead<br />

Shoals and the flats in the lagoon near the South Beach area which are sport fishing grounds for<br />

bone fish, permit and tarpon. There are approximately 125 tour guides involved in sports fishing.<br />

Again the guides mention that the sedimentation <strong>of</strong> the project can possibly affect the sea grass<br />

beds and will “chase these fish”. These guides are represented by the San Pedro branch <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Tour Guide Association.<br />

2.4 Legal Environment<br />

Current national environmental policies are based on the need to take an integrated approach to<br />

environmental management and the need to work towards the goal <strong>of</strong> sustainable development.<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> Belize through the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Environment, Coastal Zone Management<br />

Authority and Institute (now defunct), the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Fisheries, and the other government<br />

institutions are the regulatory bodies <strong>of</strong> the various instruments.<br />

2-81


2.4.1 Policy Review<br />

Current national environmental policies are based on the need to take an integrated approach to<br />

environmental management and the need to work towards the goal <strong>of</strong> sustainable development.<br />

The Government <strong>of</strong> Belize through the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment, Coastal Zone<br />

Management Authority and Institute, the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Fisheries, Forestry <strong>Department</strong> and the<br />

other government institutions are the regulatory bodies <strong>of</strong> the various instruments.<br />

Of importance to the proposed development is the need to identify those regulations and<br />

legislations which will need compliance for development activities in respect to the area and<br />

region <strong>of</strong> the proposed development. In light <strong>of</strong> the fact that the area and region <strong>of</strong> the proposed<br />

development is within an area <strong>of</strong> significant importance in terms <strong>of</strong> its tourism and ecological<br />

importance and proposed planning regime, it is also important that development activities strike<br />

a balance between development and the environment.<br />

This section is aimed at reviewing relevant environmental resource and planning legislations and<br />

regulations to ensure that the “development project” meets policy and legislative criteria, and<br />

that relevant requirements are built into project design and implementation. The policy review<br />

also outlines specific procedures and measures to be carried out before, during and after project<br />

development. It is important to note that the anticipated development site borders the Hol Chan<br />

Marine Reserve. Specific conservation zones have been established for all user activities within<br />

the marine reserve.<br />

2.4.1.1 The Environmental Protection Act SI 22/1992 and 328/2003<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>ENVIRONMENT</strong>AL PROTECTION ACT established the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment. Under<br />

section 3 (3) the <strong>Department</strong> has the responsibility to monitor the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act and<br />

Regulations, and to take necessary actions to enforce the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act and Regulations.<br />

This enabling legislation provides the Government and the <strong>Department</strong> with the comprehensive<br />

environmental protection authority it needs in order to address modern environmental pollution<br />

problems. The ACT also grants the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Environment broad regulatory and<br />

enforcement authority for the prevention and control <strong>of</strong> environmental pollution, conservation<br />

and management <strong>of</strong> natural resources, and environmental impact assessment (EIA).<br />

The Environmental Protection Act entrusted the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment with a broad<br />

range <strong>of</strong> functions relating, but not limited to, the assessment <strong>of</strong> water pollution, the coordination<br />

<strong>of</strong> activities relating to the discharge <strong>of</strong> wastes, the licensing <strong>of</strong> activities that may cause water<br />

pollution, the registration <strong>of</strong> sources <strong>of</strong> pollution and the carrying out <strong>of</strong> research and<br />

investigations as to the causes, nature and extent <strong>of</strong> water pollution, and the necessary prevention<br />

and control measures (section 5). The <strong>Department</strong> is also empowered to approve EIAs.<br />

Under the revised edition 2000 Part III 7 (1) it states that: (d) specifying the standards in excess<br />

<strong>of</strong> which pollutants discharged into the environment shall not be discharged or emitted; (e)<br />

formulating environmental codes <strong>of</strong> practices specifying procedures, practices or releases limits<br />

for environmental control relating to works, undertakings and activities during any phase <strong>of</strong> the<br />

development and operation, including the location, design, construction, start-up, closure,<br />

2-82


dismantling and clean-up phases and any subsequent monitoring activities and (f) environmental<br />

quality guidelines specifying recommendations in quantitative or qualitative terms to support and<br />

maintain particular uses <strong>of</strong> the environment and (j) the control <strong>of</strong> noise.<br />

Under the Act, no person, installation, factory or plant shall, unless specifically permitted by the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>, emit, deposit or discharge or cause emission <strong>of</strong> any pollutant or contaminant into<br />

the atmosphere or environment in contravention <strong>of</strong> the permitted levels. Every person,<br />

installation, factory or plant emitting air pollutants is required to maintain and submit to the<br />

<strong>Department</strong>, records <strong>of</strong> the type, composition and quantity <strong>of</strong> pollutants emitted.<br />

Schedule II (Regulation 8) <strong>of</strong> the 2003 revised edition specifies projects which may require an<br />

environmental impact assessment or environmental impact study depending on the location and<br />

size <strong>of</strong> the project. These include but are not limited to coastal land reclamation involving an<br />

area <strong>of</strong> more than 10 acres; resort and recreational development in terms <strong>of</strong> construction <strong>of</strong><br />

coastal resort facilities or hotels and development <strong>of</strong> tourist or recreational facilities on small<br />

islands; and infrastructure projects such as yacht marinas.<br />

No person shall cause or permit the extracting, crushing, screening, handling or conveyance <strong>of</strong><br />

materials or other operations likely to give rise to airborne dust without taking reasonable<br />

precautions, by means <strong>of</strong> spray bars or wetting agents, to prevent particulate matter form<br />

becoming airborne.<br />

Furthermore any person or undertaking exploiting the land, water resources, seas or other natural<br />

resources shall ensure the protection <strong>of</strong> the environment against unnecessary damage or from<br />

pollution by harmful substances; and no person shall emit, import, discharge, deposit, dispose <strong>of</strong><br />

or dump any waste that might directly or indirectly pollute water resources or damage or destroy<br />

marine life.<br />

2.4.1.2 Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations SI 107/1995 and 25/2007<br />

The Environmental Impact Assessment (1995) regulations describe in detail the processes<br />

involved in the preparation and evaluation <strong>of</strong> environmental impact assessments. The<br />

regulations divide projects or activities into three categories. The first category consists <strong>of</strong> those<br />

projects that automatically require an environmental assessment based on the sensitivity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

surroundings or the nature <strong>of</strong> the undertaking.<br />

The second category comprises those projects that may require an assessment to be carried out,<br />

but with some modifications based on the location and size <strong>of</strong> a project. The third category<br />

encompasses activities or programs that do not require an assessment to be conducted and which<br />

may not have significant impacts on the environment. In March <strong>of</strong> 2007, amendments to the<br />

regulations were published in which by each category or schedule would carry an application and<br />

processing fee. In addition, an environmental clearance (schedule III) fee was also instituted<br />

which should generate considerable income for the <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

The Environmental Impact Assessment Part V - 20 (4) stat es that every project, program or<br />

activity shall be assessed with a view to the need to protect and improve human health and living<br />

2-83


conditions and the need to preserve the reproductive capacity <strong>of</strong> ecosystems as well as the<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> species. Under 20 (5) when making an environmental impact assessment, a proposed<br />

developer shall consult with public and other interested bodies or organizations and under 20 (7)<br />

a decision by the DOE to approve an environmental impact assessment may be subjected to<br />

conditions which are reasonably required for environmental purposes.<br />

2.4.1.3 Effluent Limitation Regulations SI 94/1995<br />

<strong>THE</strong> <strong>ENVIRONMENT</strong>AL PROTECTION EFFLUENT LIMITATION REGULATIONS came into force in<br />

1996, at which time the <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Environment commenced enforcing the Regulations.<br />

The Regulations are intended to control and monitor discharges <strong>of</strong> effluent into any inland waters<br />

or the marine environment <strong>of</strong> Belize.<br />

2.4.1 .4Pollution Regulations SI 56/1996<br />

The Pollution Regulations <strong>of</strong> 1996 addresses issues <strong>of</strong> air, water and soil pollution, including<br />

noise pollution. Part III – 6 (1) deals generally with the emission <strong>of</strong> contaminants into the air<br />

where no person shall cause, allow or permit contaminants to be emitted or discharged either<br />

directly or indirectly into the air from any source.<br />

Part X 31 (c & d) deals with pollution <strong>of</strong> land generally that could be harmful, or potentially<br />

harmful to animals, birds, wildlife, plants or vegetation. The <strong>Department</strong> <strong>of</strong> Environment is<br />

responsible for the enforcement <strong>of</strong> the Pollution Regulations Act.<br />

2.4.2 Coastal Zone Management Strategy Chap. 329 2000 Revised Edition<br />

The Coastal Zone Management was legally established in 1998 with the passage <strong>of</strong> the Coastal<br />

Zone Management Authority Act (Act # 5 <strong>of</strong> 1998). Under section 5 (1), the main functions <strong>of</strong><br />

the Authority include (i) to advise Government on matters related to development and use <strong>of</strong><br />

resources in the coastal zone in an orderly and sustainable manner; (ii) formulation <strong>of</strong> policies on<br />

coastal zone management; (iii) development <strong>of</strong> a coastal zone management plan and revise it as<br />

needed; (iv) commission monitoring and research <strong>of</strong> coastal areas (v) promote public awareness;<br />

and (vi) prepare guidelines for developers.<br />

The Coastal Zone Management Strategy seeks to facilitate improved management <strong>of</strong> coastal<br />

resources, and to ensure economic growth is balanced with sound environmental management<br />

practices. The Strategy seeks to review and ‘enhance existing laws, regulations, ‘policies’ and<br />

guidelines relating to conservation, resource management and development controls in the<br />

coastal zone area.’<br />

These support a coastal area management framework that addresses the need for management<br />

approaches in location between, as well as within, Coastal and Marine Protected Areas, and<br />

special requirements for management development and conservation in the barrier reef region,<br />

particularly the cayes.<br />

2-84


2.4.3 Cayes Development Policy – CZMIA/Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> 1995<br />

The Cayes Development Policy has served to consolidate existing legislations, and to promulgate<br />

regulations and guidelines applicable to the development and sustainable management <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

cayes within the coastal zone <strong>of</strong> Belize. The Policy calls for a detailed planning system to control<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> land, and water development to cover the entire coastal zone. The policy also<br />

demarcates/recommends zones and a system <strong>of</strong> assigning development codes for the cayes.<br />

The main thrust <strong>of</strong> the document is to articulate the type <strong>of</strong> actions and initiatives that must be<br />

undertaken by all the various stakeholders in order to ensure sustainable use and long-term<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> natural and cultural resources and development within the coastal planning regions.<br />

The policy addresses such areas as caye ownership, protected areas management, land use<br />

planning and development control, extraction <strong>of</strong> materials, infrastructure and transport, shipping<br />

and the use <strong>of</strong> marine vessels, waste disposal and fuel storage, fiscal incentives to encourage<br />

responsible practices and incorporation <strong>of</strong> actions within the national strategic planning<br />

framework.<br />

2.4.4 Solid Waste Management Authority Act SI 224 <strong>of</strong> 2003<br />

Under the Act, the Authority shall devise ways and means for the efficient collection and<br />

disposal <strong>of</strong> solid waste employing modern methods and techniques and exploring the possibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> recycling waste materials. Under the Act “construction waste material” includes building<br />

materials from construction, alteration and remodeling building or structure <strong>of</strong> any kind, such as<br />

lumber, concrete, steel ro<strong>of</strong>ing, etc. SI 13/1991 established the Solid Waste Management<br />

Authority and gave it broad powers for the collection and disposal <strong>of</strong> solid waste.<br />

2.4.5 National Institute <strong>of</strong> Culture and History 330/2000<br />

Under section (4) <strong>of</strong> the Ancient Monuments and Antiquities Act, all ancient monuments and<br />

antiquities however situate, whether upon any land or in any river, stream or watercourse, or<br />

under territorial waters <strong>of</strong> the country, and whether or not before the date <strong>of</strong> the commencement<br />

<strong>of</strong> this Act in private ownership, possession, custody or control, shall absolutely vest in the<br />

Government. Under section (12), if any person finds any ancient monument or antiquity he shall<br />

within fourteen days <strong>of</strong> such findings report the details <strong>of</strong> the findings to the Minister.<br />

2.4.6 Belize Water Industry Act No. 1 <strong>of</strong> 2001<br />

The Water Industry Act repeals the Water and Sewerage Act, Chapter 185 <strong>of</strong> 1971 Laws <strong>of</strong><br />

Belize. Chapter one <strong>of</strong> the Act deals with controlling disposal <strong>of</strong> wastes generated from sewer<br />

treatment. The Act makes new provisions with respect to the supply and control <strong>of</strong> water and<br />

sewerage services in Belize.<br />

The Water Industry Act also establishes the responsibility <strong>of</strong> private entities to provide facilities<br />

for the final disposal <strong>of</strong> sewerage taking into consideration Chapter 36 <strong>of</strong> the Environmental<br />

Protection Act 1 <strong>of</strong> 2001.<br />

2-85


2.4.7 Belize Public Health Act Revised Edition SI 40/2000<br />

Under Part VIII <strong>of</strong> Offensive Trades 128 (1) b the Minister can make regulations relating to<br />

nuisances for the prevention, control or reduction <strong>of</strong> pollution or contamination <strong>of</strong> air, soil or<br />

water caused by any activity or condition resulting in the emission <strong>of</strong> a pollutant or contaminant<br />

into the environment. The Act also specifies restrictions and regulations for nuisances from<br />

factories or other industrial developments, and incidental provisions relating to <strong>of</strong>fensive<br />

businesses.<br />

2.4.8 National Lands Act (No. 6 <strong>of</strong> 1992) and SI 191 <strong>of</strong> 2000<br />

The Act is designed to establish a framework for the management <strong>of</strong> national lands. The Act<br />

applies to all lands (other than Reserved Forest) not already "located" or granted, including any<br />

lands acquired by or ceded to the Crown. They are classified as town, suburban, rural, mineral<br />

lands and beach lands.<br />

In Section 28, where the sea, or any sound, bay or creek is described as forming part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

boundary <strong>of</strong> any national land to be granted or disposed <strong>of</strong>, then high water mark shall be<br />

considered to be the property boundary. Under the Act, the seabed defined as the land extending<br />

seawards from the high water mark <strong>of</strong> ordinary tides, is National Land owned by the<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Belize under the authority <strong>of</strong> the National Lands Act.<br />

2.4.9 Crown Land Rules SI 60 <strong>of</strong> 1939<br />

Under Crown Land Rules (Statutory Rules and Orders 66 <strong>of</strong> 1939), a 66 ft wide strip <strong>of</strong> land<br />

along all water frontages, measured from high water mark, is designated as public easement, but<br />

lands titles prior to 1930 included the land to the high water mark and in some cases, below the<br />

high water mark.<br />

2.4.10 Mines and Minerals Act Chap. 226 <strong>of</strong> 2000<br />

The Mines and Minerals (General) Regulations provide a general framework for the<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the Mines and Minerals Act. These Regulations cover a range <strong>of</strong> topics such<br />

as application, duties, terms and conditions and failure to comply with the conditions <strong>of</strong> a mining<br />

license. Under the Act “land” includes land beneath water. The Act also addresses dredging<br />

and sand mining, which is essential in avoiding destruction to coastal habitats such as seagrass<br />

beds and the coral reef.<br />

2.4.11 Forests (Mangrove Protection) Regulations, SI No. 52 <strong>of</strong> 1989<br />

The Forests (Protection <strong>of</strong> Mangrove) Regulations, 1989, prohibit any "alteration” (which<br />

includes cutting and defoliating, but does not include "selective trimming") <strong>of</strong> mangroves on any<br />

land except with a permit (R eg. 4). Alterations which involve dredging or filling can be<br />

authorized only in "exceptional circumstances."<br />

2-86


Factors considered for issuing or denying permits include the proximity <strong>of</strong> the proposed project<br />

to coastal and reef areas known to be <strong>of</strong> outstandingly high ecological value (Reg. 5(2) (i)), and<br />

the existing or proposed plans such as the barrier reef regional management and development<br />

plan. The Mangrove Regulations were amended in 1992 to increase the level <strong>of</strong> fines and<br />

sanctions.<br />

2.4.12 The Forest Act SI 213/2000<br />

The protection <strong>of</strong> all mangroves fall under this Act via the Forest (Protection <strong>of</strong> Mangrove)<br />

Regulations. Mangrove clearance may be permitted under this Act. In most cases a permit to<br />

clear mangroves is issued after a multi-agency assessment is conducted. This Act includes the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> Forest Reserves which may include mangroves, littoral forests and water<br />

bodies. However, no specific regulations exist under this Act that address littoral forests. The<br />

Forest Act is currently being revised.<br />

The legislative basis for conservation <strong>of</strong> national lands is defined by the Forest and Wildlife<br />

Conservation Acts. The Forest Act provides for the protection and conservation <strong>of</strong> all mangrove<br />

forests on both private and national lands, any alterations to which require evaluation and permit<br />

by the Forestry <strong>Department</strong>.<br />

2.4.13 Fisheries Act (HCMR) Chap. 210s/2003<br />

The protection <strong>of</strong> the Hol Chan Marine Reserve falls under this act. The Hol Chan Marine<br />

Reserve encompasses a small area but includes all major ecological zones <strong>of</strong> Belize's coastal<br />

ecosystems. This SI introduces the zonation <strong>of</strong> the marine reserve into four distinct areas namely<br />

zones A, B, C and D. Each zone is tasked with having their particular practice, restriction and<br />

rules. Due to the nature <strong>of</strong> the Reserve, the Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> is the Governmental agency<br />

responsible for all Marine Reserves, but due to the fact that the reserve has a trust fund, there is a<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Directors that manage the finances <strong>of</strong> the reserve, while the staff, under the directives<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Fisheries <strong>Department</strong> is responsible for the day to day activities <strong>of</strong> the reserve and its<br />

operations at sea.<br />

2.4.14 Ambergris Caye Local Building Authority<br />

This ‘body’ has been given the task to oversee, monitor and regulate the civil engineering,<br />

architectural, coastal and land management activities for any proposed development on<br />

Ambergris Caye. These principles are embodied in recommended “Guidelines for the<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> Ambergris Caye” – a study which was originally produced around 1993 and<br />

continues to be reviewed. These guidelines along with good Engineering and Architectural<br />

practices are the backbone <strong>of</strong> the requirements for our development projects.<br />

Developers are therefore required to obtain legal permission for their projects prior to<br />

implementation through submitting plans to the Local Building Authority. An Impact Fee is<br />

charged for the purpose <strong>of</strong> mitigating what minimal impacts cannot reasonably be avoided from<br />

the developers projects, as well as for institutional management; and penalties as well as other<br />

legal means are in place to regulate these development activities To this end a recent review <strong>of</strong><br />

2-87


the Impact Fee Schedule (Permit Fees) is being published for information and comments <strong>of</strong> the<br />

building/engineering industry in Ambergris Caye.<br />

2.4.15 International Conventions and Agreements<br />

Belize is signatory or party to many international conventions and agreements, and is a member<br />

<strong>of</strong> many regional organizations involved in the management and protection <strong>of</strong> biological<br />

resources.<br />

(a) United Nations Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea Convention (LOSC) (ratified 13 August, 1983).<br />

(b) World Heritage Convention (ratified in 1990).<br />

(c) Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species <strong>of</strong> Wild Fauna and Flora<br />

(CITES) (ratified 1976).<br />

(d) Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (ratified in December, 1993).<br />

(e) Central American Biodiversity Convention.<br />

(f) Convention for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity and the Protection <strong>of</strong> Priority Areas in<br />

Central America.<br />

(g) Agreement on Cooperation between Belize and Mexico for the Protection and the<br />

Improvement <strong>of</strong> the Environment and the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources in the Border Zone<br />

(signed 20 September, 1991).<br />

(h) Protocol on Specially Protected Wildlife (SPAW Protocol)<br />

(I) Land-Based Sources <strong>of</strong> Pollution Protocol (LBSP).<br />

(j) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (ratified September, 1994).<br />

(k) Convention for the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Pollution from Ships (MARPOL 73/78) (ratified 12 May,<br />

1995).<br />

(l) International Convention for the Regulation <strong>of</strong> Whaling (signed 1982).<br />

(m) Agreement for the Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Provisions <strong>of</strong> the United Nations Convention on<br />

the Law <strong>of</strong> the Sea <strong>of</strong> 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management <strong>of</strong> Straddling Fish<br />

Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks (signed 1995).<br />

(n) Convention on the Prohibition <strong>of</strong> the Development, Production and Stockpiling <strong>of</strong><br />

Bacteriological (Biological) Toxins and their Destruction (signed 1980).<br />

(o) Western Central Atlantic Fisheries Commission (WECAFC) (1985).<br />

(p) Latin American Organization for Fisheries Development (OLDEPESCA) (1997).<br />

(q) Convention for the Protection and Development <strong>of</strong> the Marine Environment <strong>of</strong> the Wider<br />

Caribbean Region (The Cartagena Convention).<br />

(r) The Convention on Wetlands <strong>of</strong> International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitats<br />

(RAMSAR) (Signed 1971).<br />

(s) International Dolphin Conservation Program (IDCP).<br />

(t) International Commission for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT)<br />

(u) Inter-American Convention for the Conservation and Protection <strong>of</strong> Marine Turtles<br />

2-88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!