william t. costello, sj - The School of Literature, Communication, and ...
william t. costello, sj - The School of Literature, Communication, and ...
william t. costello, sj - The School of Literature, Communication, and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 THE SCHOLASTIC CURRICULUM AT CAMBRIDGE<br />
lege (1588) there is renewed insistence on the performance <strong>of</strong> scho-<br />
lastic exercise by all ". . . in yr own persons . . . Because it is<br />
best for increase <strong>of</strong> learning, for the greater good <strong>of</strong> youth, for the<br />
state <strong>and</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> the Coll. . ." 3 In October <strong>of</strong> 1601, Cecil, an<br />
extraordinarily active chancellor, 4 ordered the Vice-Chancellor to<br />
see to it that ". . . all dueties <strong>and</strong> exercises <strong>of</strong> learninge be dili-<br />
gently <strong>and</strong> duely performed accordinge to the Statutes 8c Orders<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Universitie . . ." 5<br />
specifying, "(i) In publique Sermons in<br />
S Maries Church. (2) In Lectures <strong>and</strong> Disputations in publique<br />
<strong>School</strong>es. (3) In diligent frequenting the same." In 1619, King<br />
James himself insisted on the status quo: "We commaund that no<br />
new erected Lectures or Sermons be permitted ... to withdrawe<br />
Scholars from their attendance on the exercises <strong>of</strong> Learning, Lec-<br />
tures, Disputations, Determinations or Declarations, either publique<br />
or private." 6 <strong>The</strong>se reform decrees, far from showing a departure<br />
from scholastic traditions, demonstrate clearly that the<br />
authorities at Cambridge were to concern themselves not at all in<br />
changing a subscript iota <strong>of</strong> tradition but solely in improving the<br />
breed scholastic.<br />
A system <strong>of</strong> thought with an eight-hundred-years-old name<br />
might be expected to have developed a special character. While<br />
historians <strong>of</strong> philosophy may disagree on the primary character-<br />
istic, all will concede that scholasticism, as received by the seventeenth<br />
century, retained three distinguishing marks: it was dialec-<br />
tical, Aristotelian, <strong>and</strong> highly systematized.<br />
<strong>The</strong> dialectical character <strong>of</strong> scholasticism, that is, its concern<br />
with logic <strong>and</strong> logical formalities, its disputatiousness, was its<br />
most obvious ~ <strong>and</strong>, to its critics, most irritating quality. This<br />
dialectical bent was due to the fact that the early schoolmen had<br />
at h<strong>and</strong> only the De Interpretatione <strong>of</strong> Aristotle, to which were<br />
added Boethius' translation <strong>of</strong> the Categoriae in the tenth century,<br />
<strong>and</strong> in the twelfth century the first book <strong>of</strong> the Prior Analytics,<br />
the Topics, <strong>and</strong> the De Sophisticis Elenchis. Thus, until the<br />
end <strong>of</strong> the twelfth century, the logical tractates were practically<br />
all that were known <strong>of</strong> the Philosopher's writings. Further, the<br />
struggles between the various strains <strong>of</strong> early medieval philosophy<br />
over the solution to the problem <strong>of</strong> the universal idea, the<br />
struggles, namely, between the exaggerated realism <strong>of</strong> the medieval<br />
Platonists, the nominalism <strong>of</strong> Occam, <strong>and</strong> the conceptualism<br />
<strong>of</strong> William <strong>of</strong> Champeaux (to which should be added the<br />
attacks <strong>of</strong> the Scotists upon Aquinas on ontological issues), had<br />
established a tradition <strong>of</strong> dispute. <strong>The</strong> typical scholastic was not