10.04.2013 Views

Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes

Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes

Pacific Plate Biogeography, with Special Reference to Shorefishes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NUMBER 367 29<br />

stricted <strong>to</strong> the Indo-West <strong>Pacific</strong>; one (2.23 m) in<br />

the eastern Atlantic and Indo-West <strong>Pacific</strong>; three<br />

(1.0-1.5 m) only in the western <strong>Pacific</strong>; one (1.72<br />

m) only in the western Indian Ocean; and one<br />

(1.34 m) in the western Atlantic, eastern <strong>Pacific</strong>,<br />

and western <strong>Pacific</strong>.<br />

From the information presented above, it is<br />

apparent that size alone is insufficient <strong>to</strong> account<br />

Bombay, India, east and south <strong>to</strong> Java and north<br />

<strong>to</strong> Tinghai, Chekiang Province, China, and Japan<br />

(and perhaps <strong>to</strong> the Bonin Islands; see Zama<br />

and Fujita, 1977, as S. wahlbeemi). It is also recorded<br />

from Sarawak, but not the Philippines.<br />

Loxodon is also monotypic, but <strong>with</strong> a wider Indo-<br />

West <strong>Pacific</strong> distribution (Figure 13) than Scolio-<br />

don. Loxodon is the only one of the three genera<br />

for the presence or absence of Carcharhinus species that occurs on islands (Seychelles, Mascarene Pla-<br />

on the <strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>Plate</strong> (although all four of the teau, including, perhaps, Mauritius) remote from<br />

worldwide species are large). The large propor- continents. Springer (1964) reported extreme and<br />

tion of the species that reach the margin of, but discontinuous variation in numbers of precaudal<br />

do not extend out on, the <strong>Plate</strong>, agrees <strong>with</strong> my vertebrae in different populations of Loxodon, in-<br />

findings on other elasmobranch groups, which, in dicating that a species complex might be in-<br />

general, tend <strong>to</strong> be absent from the <strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>Plate</strong>. volved. The Seychelles and Mascarene <strong>Plate</strong>au<br />

To avoid the possible criticism that there are are continental fragments (Scrut<strong>to</strong>n, 1976), and<br />

probably inadequate data available for large it is possible that the populations of Loxodon were<br />

sharks on the <strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>Plate</strong>, it is noted that Stras- left behind <strong>to</strong> diverge (vertebrally) when the conburg<br />

(1958) reported on longline collections that tinent, or continents (India, Africa), that were<br />

covered much of the central <strong>Pacific</strong> during a four- associated <strong>with</strong> the fragments disappeared or<br />

year period and produced over 6000 specimens of moved away.<br />

sharks, but only 12 species, of which only three Rhizoprionodon, <strong>with</strong> seven species (three Indowere<br />

Carcharhinus.<br />

West <strong>Pacific</strong>, of which one also occurs in the<br />

Triaenodon contains two species. Triaenodon obtu- eastern Atlantic; one eastern <strong>Pacific</strong>; and three<br />

sus is known only from the holotype from India western Atlantic) is more widespread (Figure 13)<br />

(Taniuchi, 1975). Triaenodon obesus, which attainsthan<br />

Loxodon, occurring more or less circumtrop-<br />

a length of 2.13 m, is found only near coral reefs, ically, but absent from the <strong>Pacific</strong> <strong>Plate</strong>.<br />

often resting in caves, yet it ranges from the Red It is not hard <strong>to</strong> visualize the distributions of<br />

Sea and east coast of Africa eastward <strong>to</strong> Panama Loxodon and Scoliodon as representative of levels of<br />

(Randall, 1977). Randall (1977) tagged 124 T. increasing restriction in distribution from what<br />

obesus at Johns<strong>to</strong>n Island and recovered seven were previously widespread distributions similar<br />

after 16 days <strong>to</strong> two years; none had moved more <strong>to</strong> that found for Rhizoprionodon; especially as all<br />

than 2.9 km from their tagging site (tagging three genera occur <strong>to</strong>gether over much of their<br />

information in the abstract <strong>to</strong> Randall's paper Indo-West <strong>Pacific</strong> distribution. Bearing on this<br />

expands on tagging data reported in the body of are the distributions of the two subgenera of<br />

the paper). One may wonder, as did Randall, Rhizoprionodon. The type subgenus has the same<br />

how such a sluggish, reef-associated shark was overall distribution as the genus, whereas the<br />

able <strong>to</strong> cross the <strong>Pacific</strong>. A possible answer <strong>to</strong> this other subgenus, Pro<strong>to</strong>zygaena, has a disjunct distri-<br />

question is discussed in the section on the geologbution, occurring from India <strong>to</strong> Queensland in<br />

ical his<strong>to</strong>ry of the <strong>Pacific</strong> and Philippine plates. the western <strong>Pacific</strong>, and from Panama <strong>to</strong> southern<br />

Scoliodon, Loxodon, and Rhizoprionodon comprise Brazil in the western Atlantic. If the distribution<br />

small, shallow-dwelling sharks <strong>with</strong> maximum of the subgenus Pro<strong>to</strong>zygaena is segregated, the<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal lengths of about 350-1000 mm. The species order of increasing distributional restriction is as<br />

are of commercial importance in Asia. The genera follows: Rhizoprionodon, Pro<strong>to</strong>zygaena, Loxodon, Sco-<br />

were revised by Springer (1964). Scoliodon is monliodon.otypic and its distribution is coastal, from about Galeocerdo (tiger shark), monotypic, is a large

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!