19.04.2013 Views

E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly

E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly

E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1976. LEGISLATIVE JOURNAL-HOUSE 5147<br />

discovered that I could get them at another drugstore can get the best prescription for the lowest dollar. That<br />

for SG pur hundrcd tablets, and I simply wrnt back to my is really what it is all about. Do you really want to help<br />

doctor and hc wrote n prescription to that particular these people buy their drugs chcapcr? And I Suggest if<br />

pharmacy tlhzt charged the lesser pricc. This deals with that is what yon want to do, you would offer the choice<br />

Mr. Ryan's problem of the sccnnd drugqtorc thus having of portability.<br />

the original ~rescrintion sli~. . . namely, the second slill Thank yon, Mr. Spezker.<br />

that the doctor wrote. <strong>The</strong>refore, the enforcement<br />

I On thr question recurring,<br />

problem is dealt with as much as we can deal with it.<br />

Will thc House agree to the amendmf:nt?<br />

<strong>The</strong> consumer prohlem raised by Mr. Wilson is also -<br />

dealt with in that a customer can simply shop around via <strong>The</strong> yeas and ;lays \vere required by Mr. WILSON and<br />

the telephone, as was suggested by Mrs. Fawcett, and find Mrs. TOLL and were as follows:<br />

the cheaper pharmacy and then get a re-issued prescription<br />

from the doctor and thus we avoid some of the<br />

YEAS4<br />

forgery problems and drug abuse problems that I sin- Hutchlnson,<br />

cerely believe are inherent in Mr. Wilson's amendment.<br />

Perd wiwel<br />

Sincr. T believe thc amendment is malformed and NAYS-194<br />

dnngcrous, I urge the me-nhcrs to votr against it.<br />

Abraham<br />

:fleClatehy Salvatore<br />

An5am. J. H.<br />

McCue<br />

Schenffer<br />

<strong>The</strong> SPEAKER. <strong>The</strong> Chair recognizes the gentlrman Am-<br />

McGlnnis Sehmltt<br />

Trnm Mi;ntgomcry, Mr. Yohn.<br />

9mb.I<br />

MeIntyre sehwedu<br />

Rellomln(<br />

McLane Selllea<br />

RZr. YOTTN. Mr. Speaker, I would urge the membr.1.r ne~,~en<br />

Mphus<br />

Seltzer<br />

to rcad the, amendment very careRilly. I think that it "-<br />

Menhorn Shane<br />

Berlin<br />

Milanovbh shelhamtr<br />

was distrih~~ted some time azo and it was difficult on mir uenon<br />

Miller. M. E. Shelton<br />

side oi the aisle nt least to find a copy of the amend- uinle<br />

ATiller, M. E., sr. Shuman<br />

Bradley<br />

Miluron Shupdk<br />

ment. But the amendment is very short. It does not ~ ~ ~ ~ d t MiSCrvfCh strlmni<br />

contain the protections that Mr. VJilsnn would like lo Srunner<br />

Morhlrnann Smith. E.<br />

YUTM<br />

Gllng<br />

Mords smltli. L.<br />

have in it that he has stntcd arc in it. <strong>The</strong> 1:nguage of nutma<br />

Halverson Mullen. M. P. Spencer<br />

the amendment does not contain those protections. I Ca~eto Hamilton. J. H. Mullrn<br />

s-1<br />

think that those pr:'lccticns ar.e nhroh~tely necessary for<br />

Hammoc* Mua40<br />

Stapleton<br />

~ ~ ~ ~ u l H~~BY I l<br />

Mrkonlc stout<br />

us to consider this type of n prop:~snl and, until they are Cimlni<br />

Harkell Myera<br />

Taddonio<br />

in the am~ndment, I would sugzest that the amendment<br />

Haye. n. S. Novalc<br />

Taylor<br />

$:km<br />

Haye., S. E. Noye<br />

Thomas<br />

he defc>,tcr!. Thank you.<br />

Cowtu<br />

H-pford O'Brten Toll<br />

Crawford Hill<br />

O'Co~ell Re110<br />

<strong>The</strong> SPEAKER. <strong>The</strong> Chair recognizes the gentleman Cumberland Hopkins O'Donnell Turner<br />

DBv~u<br />

Hutchinson. W. O'Krefc<br />

Irdm Bucks, Mr. Wilson.<br />

UstynosLl<br />

~e~edio rmi.<br />

Oliver<br />

ValIcenU<br />

Mr. WILSON. Mr. Speaker, just a minor rebuttal to<br />

ltkin<br />

Pancoast Vrmn<br />

;%a,", .rohnson. 3. Parker. H. S. Wnener<br />

thc cppoi~cnts of my amendment.<br />

Dicarlo Kelly, A. P. Perry warn. T. P.<br />

I would sl:g$r.st that the genticman. Mr. Ryan, and<br />

Kelly, J. B. Petruree w&m<br />

;,'Lna*<br />

Kern& Pievsky Wargo<br />

,-!.her.; renii the hiil itself. Pace 10, line 3, says and T n:nj,a<br />

Kistler<br />

Pit*<br />

W d k<br />

slate:<br />

nrrnimrabl Klingvrnan Polite<br />

Westerberg<br />

Dorr<br />

Knepper Pratt<br />

Whclan<br />

THE STAT": BOARD OF PFTARMACY SHALL<br />

Kowalpshyn Prendergart wiggins<br />

2dEelbb K31111<br />

Pyln<br />

Williams<br />

FIAVF, TI!:: POWER AND ITS DUTY SHALT, Dumas<br />

LaMarc* Rappapor+ Wllt, R. W.<br />

BF: TO:<br />

Eekensbcrge Laudndio llavenstahl wui W. w.<br />

Enzlehart I.auehlin Reed<br />

W0jdSk<br />

(1) ADILI!N!STER AND ENFORCE TIIF: PRO- Pswcen<br />

Remlnger<br />

VlSiONS OF THIS ACT.<br />

Fee<br />

Renwck<br />

Fischer<br />

modes<br />

(2) ADOFT NECESSARY REGULATIONS CON- rfsker<br />

Hiehrlrdson<br />

SISTENT WITH TlIIS ACT.<br />

P'laherhr 1Jncoln Rieger<br />

Foster. A. Logue<br />

Rltter<br />

Lynch<br />

R031 zi% w. Mandertno Ruggiero<br />

@Tyer<br />

Mnnmllls Ryan<br />

Gnllagher McCaII Saloom<br />

I would suggest that that would set the number of<br />

copies anrl who is going to h;ve a copy and so forth and<br />

SO on.<br />

We have talked about abuse, and the gentleman, Mr.<br />

Shaoe, has talked about going hack to his doctor, and ?<br />

sc,pposi. he is going to pay the doctor another $10 or<br />

$15 tor znother prescription so that he can go out and<br />

~ave $2 on the prescription itself.<br />

Enforcement of this nmendmrnt is no more difficult<br />

than enforcement of the current law or enforcement of<br />

this particular proposal, I-Iouse bill No. 473. If we c2re<br />

to enforre il. if we care to make the law stand and he<br />

tight and be regulated, we can do it. If we do not care<br />

tn. we do not have to.<br />

NOT VOTING-5<br />

gz&: Koltcr PAeGraw<br />

So the question was determined in<br />

was not agreed<br />

Ymer<br />

the negative<br />

1 suggest that if we arc going to save thc consumer '<strong>The</strong> SPEAICER. This bill has been considered on three<br />

.one money, we can put this portability amendment in diiferent days and agreed to and is now on final passage.<br />

there. the proh!ems will be taken care of and the people <strong>The</strong> question is. Shall the bill pass finally?<br />

and<br />

On the question recurring,<br />

the House agree lo the bill as on third<br />

consideration?<br />

Bill as amended was agreed to.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!