E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly
E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly
E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1976. LEGISLATIVE JOURNAL-HOUSE 5147<br />
discovered that I could get them at another drugstore can get the best prescription for the lowest dollar. That<br />
for SG pur hundrcd tablets, and I simply wrnt back to my is really what it is all about. Do you really want to help<br />
doctor and hc wrote n prescription to that particular these people buy their drugs chcapcr? And I Suggest if<br />
pharmacy tlhzt charged the lesser pricc. This deals with that is what yon want to do, you would offer the choice<br />
Mr. Ryan's problem of the sccnnd drugqtorc thus having of portability.<br />
the original ~rescrintion sli~. . . namely, the second slill Thank yon, Mr. Spezker.<br />
that the doctor wrote. <strong>The</strong>refore, the enforcement<br />
I On thr question recurring,<br />
problem is dealt with as much as we can deal with it.<br />
Will thc House agree to the amendmf:nt?<br />
<strong>The</strong> consumer prohlem raised by Mr. Wilson is also -<br />
dealt with in that a customer can simply shop around via <strong>The</strong> yeas and ;lays \vere required by Mr. WILSON and<br />
the telephone, as was suggested by Mrs. Fawcett, and find Mrs. TOLL and were as follows:<br />
the cheaper pharmacy and then get a re-issued prescription<br />
from the doctor and thus we avoid some of the<br />
YEAS4<br />
forgery problems and drug abuse problems that I sin- Hutchlnson,<br />
cerely believe are inherent in Mr. Wilson's amendment.<br />
Perd wiwel<br />
Sincr. T believe thc amendment is malformed and NAYS-194<br />
dnngcrous, I urge the me-nhcrs to votr against it.<br />
Abraham<br />
:fleClatehy Salvatore<br />
An5am. J. H.<br />
McCue<br />
Schenffer<br />
<strong>The</strong> SPEAKER. <strong>The</strong> Chair recognizes the gentlrman Am-<br />
McGlnnis Sehmltt<br />
Trnm Mi;ntgomcry, Mr. Yohn.<br />
9mb.I<br />
MeIntyre sehwedu<br />
Rellomln(<br />
McLane Selllea<br />
RZr. YOTTN. Mr. Speaker, I would urge the membr.1.r ne~,~en<br />
Mphus<br />
Seltzer<br />
to rcad the, amendment very careRilly. I think that it "-<br />
Menhorn Shane<br />
Berlin<br />
Milanovbh shelhamtr<br />
was distrih~~ted some time azo and it was difficult on mir uenon<br />
Miller. M. E. Shelton<br />
side oi the aisle nt least to find a copy of the amend- uinle<br />
ATiller, M. E., sr. Shuman<br />
Bradley<br />
Miluron Shupdk<br />
ment. But the amendment is very short. It does not ~ ~ ~ ~ d t MiSCrvfCh strlmni<br />
contain the protections that Mr. VJilsnn would like lo Srunner<br />
Morhlrnann Smith. E.<br />
YUTM<br />
Gllng<br />
Mords smltli. L.<br />
have in it that he has stntcd arc in it. <strong>The</strong> 1:nguage of nutma<br />
Halverson Mullen. M. P. Spencer<br />
the amendment does not contain those protections. I Ca~eto Hamilton. J. H. Mullrn<br />
s-1<br />
think that those pr:'lccticns ar.e nhroh~tely necessary for<br />
Hammoc* Mua40<br />
Stapleton<br />
~ ~ ~ ~ u l H~~BY I l<br />
Mrkonlc stout<br />
us to consider this type of n prop:~snl and, until they are Cimlni<br />
Harkell Myera<br />
Taddonio<br />
in the am~ndment, I would sugzest that the amendment<br />
Haye. n. S. Novalc<br />
Taylor<br />
$:km<br />
Haye., S. E. Noye<br />
Thomas<br />
he defc>,tcr!. Thank you.<br />
Cowtu<br />
H-pford O'Brten Toll<br />
Crawford Hill<br />
O'Co~ell Re110<br />
<strong>The</strong> SPEAKER. <strong>The</strong> Chair recognizes the gentleman Cumberland Hopkins O'Donnell Turner<br />
DBv~u<br />
Hutchinson. W. O'Krefc<br />
Irdm Bucks, Mr. Wilson.<br />
UstynosLl<br />
~e~edio rmi.<br />
Oliver<br />
ValIcenU<br />
Mr. WILSON. Mr. Speaker, just a minor rebuttal to<br />
ltkin<br />
Pancoast Vrmn<br />
;%a,", .rohnson. 3. Parker. H. S. Wnener<br />
thc cppoi~cnts of my amendment.<br />
Dicarlo Kelly, A. P. Perry warn. T. P.<br />
I would sl:g$r.st that the genticman. Mr. Ryan, and<br />
Kelly, J. B. Petruree w&m<br />
;,'Lna*<br />
Kern& Pievsky Wargo<br />
,-!.her.; renii the hiil itself. Pace 10, line 3, says and T n:nj,a<br />
Kistler<br />
Pit*<br />
W d k<br />
slate:<br />
nrrnimrabl Klingvrnan Polite<br />
Westerberg<br />
Dorr<br />
Knepper Pratt<br />
Whclan<br />
THE STAT": BOARD OF PFTARMACY SHALL<br />
Kowalpshyn Prendergart wiggins<br />
2dEelbb K31111<br />
Pyln<br />
Williams<br />
FIAVF, TI!:: POWER AND ITS DUTY SHALT, Dumas<br />
LaMarc* Rappapor+ Wllt, R. W.<br />
BF: TO:<br />
Eekensbcrge Laudndio llavenstahl wui W. w.<br />
Enzlehart I.auehlin Reed<br />
W0jdSk<br />
(1) ADILI!N!STER AND ENFORCE TIIF: PRO- Pswcen<br />
Remlnger<br />
VlSiONS OF THIS ACT.<br />
Fee<br />
Renwck<br />
Fischer<br />
modes<br />
(2) ADOFT NECESSARY REGULATIONS CON- rfsker<br />
Hiehrlrdson<br />
SISTENT WITH TlIIS ACT.<br />
P'laherhr 1Jncoln Rieger<br />
Foster. A. Logue<br />
Rltter<br />
Lynch<br />
R031 zi% w. Mandertno Ruggiero<br />
@Tyer<br />
Mnnmllls Ryan<br />
Gnllagher McCaII Saloom<br />
I would suggest that that would set the number of<br />
copies anrl who is going to h;ve a copy and so forth and<br />
SO on.<br />
We have talked about abuse, and the gentleman, Mr.<br />
Shaoe, has talked about going hack to his doctor, and ?<br />
sc,pposi. he is going to pay the doctor another $10 or<br />
$15 tor znother prescription so that he can go out and<br />
~ave $2 on the prescription itself.<br />
Enforcement of this nmendmrnt is no more difficult<br />
than enforcement of the current law or enforcement of<br />
this particular proposal, I-Iouse bill No. 473. If we c2re<br />
to enforre il. if we care to make the law stand and he<br />
tight and be regulated, we can do it. If we do not care<br />
tn. we do not have to.<br />
NOT VOTING-5<br />
gz&: Koltcr PAeGraw<br />
So the question was determined in<br />
was not agreed<br />
Ymer<br />
the negative<br />
1 suggest that if we arc going to save thc consumer '<strong>The</strong> SPEAICER. This bill has been considered on three<br />
.one money, we can put this portability amendment in diiferent days and agreed to and is now on final passage.<br />
there. the proh!ems will be taken care of and the people <strong>The</strong> question is. Shall the bill pass finally?<br />
and<br />
On the question recurring,<br />
the House agree lo the bill as on third<br />
consideration?<br />
Bill as amended was agreed to.