19.04.2013 Views

E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly

E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly

E:zF Katz - The Pennsylvania General Assembly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1976. LEGISLATIVE<br />

On the question recurring,<br />

Shall the bill pass finally?<br />

Agreeable to the provision of the constitution, the<br />

yeas and nays were taken and were as follows:<br />

JOURNAL-HOUSE 5129<br />

Mr. MANDERINO. Yes, Mr. Speaker.<br />

<strong>The</strong> SPEAKER. <strong>The</strong> gentleman will proceed.<br />

Mr. ZEARFOSS. Mr. Speaker, I have read over this<br />

bill, and it indicates that jurisdiction to try certain cases<br />

is put in this Court of Claims. Does that indicate that<br />

it is exclusive jurisdiction? In other words, is any other<br />

tribunal in this Commonwealth capable of trying the<br />

same claims, or must they go bcfore the Court of Claims?<br />

Mr. MANDERINO. Mr. Spcaker-<br />

Mr. ZEARFOSS. <strong>The</strong> bill does not say "exclusive."<br />

That is why I am asking the question.<br />

Mr. MANDERINO. Mr. Speaker, I am not sure of the<br />

answer to the gentleman's question. If you would want<br />

to defer final passage of this until I look at the section<br />

that he is asking ahout, then maybe I can answer his<br />

question.<br />

Mr. ZEARFOSS. Mr. Speaker, I am willing to put<br />

this over temporarily, because I do think it is an important<br />

issue. It has been raised in several court cases.<br />

I do not think the bill does determine it definitively, and<br />

I think some record ,should be made at this time to indicate<br />

what is intended.<br />

Mr. MANDERINO. Mr. Speaker, perhaps in answer<br />

YEAS-186<br />

to the gentleman-and we can dispose of this matter<br />

at this time-it is my understanding, and the persons<br />

who have looked at the hill more closely than I have<br />

indicated, that we are not ch?nging the manner of jurisdiction<br />

that we have right now. By reference to the act<br />

we are simply saying that the court will have the same<br />

jurisdiction that t h ~ various acts give to the court at<br />

this time.<br />

Mr. ZEARFOSS. One other question: <strong>The</strong> hill, and I<br />

guess the present law, provides that the court would<br />

have jurisdiction only of claims in excess of $300. How<br />

are the claims against the Commonwealth under $300<br />

NAYS-2<br />

tried under the law as amended or under present law? Halveman Perry<br />

Mr. MANDERINO. Mr. Speaker, I am going to give<br />

y,>u my opinion. I do not think there is a place to take<br />

claims under $300. It may he the Board of Finance and ~~~~~~~ Revenue. I lmom it is not the Court of Claims.<br />

Gleasm<br />

flammoek<br />

Mr. ZEARFOSS. Would it be conceivable that a claim<br />

NOT VOTING-15<br />

Kolter Mullen. M. P.<br />

McGraw 0.Domell<br />

Miller. M. E.. Jr. Oliver<br />

Moehlmam Rhodes<br />

Wagner<br />

WaLsh. T. P.<br />

Y&er<br />

under $300 would be taken to a local district justice? <strong>The</strong> majority required by the Constitution having<br />

Mr. MANDERINO. Viell, you are going to get into the voted in the affirmative, the question was determined<br />

rlnestion of sovereign immunity, but I imagine you can. in the affirmative.<br />

Some people have taken claims to court in the lower Ordered, That the clerk present the same to the Sencourts<br />

and have had the doctrine of sovereign immunity ate for roncurrmcc.<br />

very much modified in recent years.<br />

Mr. ZEARFOSS. Does the doctrine of sovereign immunity,<br />

Mr. Speaker, apply to contract cases? I was<br />

TRANSPORTATION B1I.L ON<br />

TkIIRT) CONSIDERATION<br />

under the im~ression that it applied only in tort situations.<br />

Agreeable to order,<br />

<strong>The</strong> Rouse proceeded to third consideration of Senate<br />

Mr. MANDERINO. Mr. Speaker. I am not going to<br />

bill No, 888, printer,s No, entitled:<br />

attempt to stand here and give a dissertation in the<br />

law of sovereign immunity. <strong>The</strong> Supreme Court is evolv- An Act amending the act of June 1, 1945 (P. L. 1242,<br />

ing right now, as you are well aware, M~. speaker, the<br />

NO. 428), entitled "State Highway Law: further provid-<br />

Ing for vegetation along h~ghways.<br />

law of sovereign immunity in this jurisdiction, and I<br />

would not hope to be an expert on the matter.<br />

On the question.<br />

Mr. ZEARFOSS. Thank you. Mr. Speaker.<br />

Will the House agree to the bill on third consideration?<br />

Abraham mer Manderino Scheaffer<br />

Irlanmfller Sehmitt<br />

yzz J. GarLLa McCall Schweder<br />

mrber Geseg MeClatchy Scirica<br />

~~~;~~"<br />

Geisler MeCue Seltzer<br />

Bere,,<br />

George<br />

~iammnrco<br />

McGinnIs<br />

~crntyre<br />

Shane<br />

shelhnmer<br />

Berlln Gillerpie ILrcLane Shelton<br />

Berson Gll!ette Mebus Shumm<br />

Bittle<br />

Bonetto<br />

Bmdley<br />

armdt<br />

Gleeson<br />

Goodman<br />

Gleen<br />

Greenfield<br />

Menhorn<br />

Milenovlch<br />

i l l ME.<br />

n~illiron<br />

Shupnlk<br />

Sirianni<br />

Smith. E.<br />

smlth, L.<br />

Br-er Grieeo Miscevieh Spencer<br />

Bum<br />

Rutera<br />

Gnng Morris<br />

Hamilton. J. R. Mrkonic<br />

Stahl<br />

Stapleton<br />

Caputo Hasay Mullrn<br />

Ceasar<br />

Haskell Musto<br />

Cianeiulli Hayes, D. S. Mycrs<br />

IIayes. S. E. Novak ~~~~ Hepiord Noye<br />

Cole HIII O'Brlen<br />

Hopktns O'Connell :,"$ird Hutchinson. A. O'Keeie<br />

Cumberland Hutchinson. W. Paneosst<br />

1mls Parker. H. S. :z~lo ltkin Pen1<br />

~everter Johnson. J. Petrarea<br />

DeWeese <strong>Katz</strong> Picvsky<br />

Dlcarlo Kelly, A. P. Pitts<br />

stout<br />

Taddonlo<br />

Taplor<br />

Thomas<br />

Toll<br />

TE~O<br />

Turner<br />

Ustynoskl<br />

Vallcentl<br />

Vrwn<br />

WBnSBCZ<br />

Wargo<br />

Weldner<br />

Westerberg<br />

DiDonato Kelly. J. B. Polite whelan<br />

~ ~ ~<br />

Kernlck<br />

Klstler n l<br />

Pratt<br />

Prmdcrgart<br />

Wiggtns<br />

Williams<br />

~ ~ r n b ~ m~ k ~ ~<br />

Do'T Xnepper<br />

Doyle Kowalyshyn<br />

D, Kusre<br />

Eckensberser LaMsrcs<br />

pyxes i ~<br />

Rappaport<br />

Ravenstah1<br />

Reed<br />

Renninger<br />

Wlhon g<br />

wllt. R. W.<br />

Wllt. W. W.<br />

Wojdak<br />

Wo~low<br />

~ ~<br />

Englehart Laudadlo Renwiek Wright<br />

Fa,,,, Laughlin Richardson Yohn<br />

Fee 1.ederer<br />

Lehr<br />

Rieger<br />

Ritter<br />

Zearloss<br />

Zeller<br />

Letterman Ross Zord<br />

Flaherty<br />

Foster. A.<br />

w,<br />

Lev1<br />

Lincoln<br />

Logue<br />

Rugglero<br />

Ryan<br />

Saloom<br />

Z W<br />

Fineman.<br />

Freind Lynch Saivatorc Speaker<br />

BILL RECOMMITTED<br />

Mr. IRVIS moved that Senate bill No. 888 be recom-<br />

mitted to the Committee on Transportation.<br />

Motion was agreed to.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!