24.04.2013 Views

Goldenberg Commission of Inquiry Report - Mars Group Kenya

Goldenberg Commission of Inquiry Report - Mars Group Kenya

Goldenberg Commission of Inquiry Report - Mars Group Kenya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dwindling. A witness, pr<strong>of</strong>essor, T. Ryan, a pr<strong>of</strong>essor in Macro-<br />

Economics, and who for a long time worked in various capacities in the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Finance, testified that the economic slump was due to various<br />

factors. Chief <strong>of</strong> those, he said, was macro-economic instability. There<br />

was a high turn over <strong>of</strong> economic managers in the Ministries <strong>of</strong> Finance<br />

and Planning. There were no clear economic policies on key aspects.<br />

The political policies <strong>of</strong> the government scared <strong>of</strong>f both multilateral and<br />

bilateral donors who, over the years, gradually reduced their donor<br />

support and investment. Consequently, the government increasingly fell<br />

back on local borrowing, with the result that its overseas debt servicing<br />

became irregular.<br />

64. The credibility <strong>of</strong> the government’s political and economic policies<br />

was lost. The government was put under extreme pressure from both the<br />

World Bank and the IMF to change its macro-economic policies, more<br />

particularly on the aspect <strong>of</strong> market controls. The two Institutions<br />

demanded that the market be liberalized. These institutions increasingly<br />

interfered with formulation and implementation <strong>of</strong> economic policies in<br />

<strong>Kenya</strong>. For instance whatever economic proposal the government came<br />

up with was subject to approval <strong>of</strong> the World Bank and IMF. Hence the<br />

various economic schemes which the government later adopted, and<br />

which we shall discuss later in this report, were either adopted at the<br />

behest <strong>of</strong> these two institutions or with their express approval. In<br />

addition the two institutions did not favour protective economic policies<br />

and pressed for the repeal or removal from various local legislation <strong>of</strong> all<br />

manner <strong>of</strong> controls. Top on the list <strong>of</strong> those legislations were the Price<br />

Control Act Cap 504 Laws <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong> and Exchange Control Act, Cap<br />

113 Laws <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong>. The economic policies in place at the time leaned<br />

towards the protection <strong>of</strong> certain local industries and regulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

exportation <strong>of</strong> foreign exchange out <strong>of</strong> the country to ensure that limited<br />

foreign exchange reserves were not depleted below a certain limit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!