24.04.2013 Views

Goldenberg Commission of Inquiry Report - Mars Group Kenya

Goldenberg Commission of Inquiry Report - Mars Group Kenya

Goldenberg Commission of Inquiry Report - Mars Group Kenya

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Nations (UN) specialized agencies. The UN is made up <strong>of</strong> about 184<br />

countries. These countries are jointly responsible as to how these two<br />

institutions are financed and run. Each country, for instance, has a<br />

quota as to how much it should contribute to the institutions. These<br />

contributions depend on the strength <strong>of</strong> each country’s economy. The<br />

quota also determines the voting rights <strong>of</strong> each country.<br />

69. Although decisions <strong>of</strong> the two institutions on loans to its members<br />

are supposed to be based on economic factors, over the years political<br />

considerations have increasingly, albeit un<strong>of</strong>ficially, had a bearing on<br />

their decisions regarding lending to certain countries. For instance in<br />

early 1990’s the decisions <strong>of</strong> IMF and World Bank were largely influenced<br />

by the attitude <strong>of</strong> the USA towards <strong>Kenya</strong>. As we stated earlier its<br />

ambassador to <strong>Kenya</strong>, Smith Hempstone, was highly critical <strong>of</strong> the<br />

political policies <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kenya</strong> and his sentiments were supported by his<br />

country. USA has the highest quota in the financing <strong>of</strong> both the<br />

institutions. Its attitude to <strong>Kenya</strong> clearly shows that economic and<br />

political factors cannot be separated in dealing with lending to individual<br />

countries by the institutions.<br />

70. Below is a short statement in the website<br />

http:/1www.imf.org/external/pub/ft/exrp/what.htm at page 24 which<br />

spells out the role <strong>of</strong> the two institutions.<br />

“The World Bank and IMF make support available to<br />

governments in the development <strong>of</strong> their strategies, but<br />

without directing the outcome. World Bank and IMF<br />

management realize that this requires a shift in the<br />

organizational cultures and attitude both in these<br />

organizations and in partner institutions. This shift is<br />

taking place. By coordinating early and maintaining open<br />

lines <strong>of</strong> communication with country authorities –<br />

particularly by providing available diagnostic information –<br />

the World Bank and IMF can ensure that they help<br />

countries in a timely and comprehensive way.<br />

Each institution must focus on its areas <strong>of</strong> expertise.<br />

Thus, World Bank staff take the lead in advising on the<br />

social policies involved in poverty reduction, including the<br />

necessary diagnostic work. The IMF advises governments<br />

in the areas <strong>of</strong> its traditional mandate, including

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!