Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises

216 RAYMOND S. NICKERSON
well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of
individual variations in a juror reasoning task.
Psychological Science, 5, 289-296.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific
revolutions (2nd ed). Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning.
Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
Kunda, Z., & Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The psychometrics
of everyday life. Cognitive Psychology, 18,
195-224.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic
of mathematical discovery (J. Worrall & E. Zahar,
Eds.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1978). Falsification and the methodology
of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos
The methodology of scientific research programmes
(J. Worrall & G. Currie, Eds.; pp. 8-101).
New York: Cambridge University Press.
Langer, E. J., & Abelson, R. P. (1974). A patient by
any other name... : Clinical group differences in
labeling bias. Journal of Consulting and Clinical
Psychology, 42, 4-9.
Laplace, P. S. (1956). Concerning probability. In J. R.
Newman (Ed.), The world of mathematics (Vol. 2;
pp. 1325-1333). New York: Simon and Schuster.
(Original work published 1814)
Lawson, R. (1968). Order of presentation as a factor
in jury persuasion. Kentucky Law Journal, 56,
523-555.
Lefford, A. (1946). The influence of emotional
subject matter on logical reasoning. Journal of
General Psychology, 34, 127-151.
LeGrand, H. E. (1988). Drifting continents and
shifting theories: The modern revolution in geology
and scientific change. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.
Legrenzi, P. (1970). Relations between language and
reasoning about deductive rules. In G. B. Flores
d'Arcais & W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.), Advances in
psychologistics (pp. 322-333). Amsterdam: North
Holland.
Lenski, G. E., & Leggett, J. C. (1960). Caste, class,
and deference in the research interview. American
Journal of Sociology, 65, 463^4-67.
Levine, M. (1970). Human discrimination learning.
The subset-sampling assumption. Psychological
Bulletin, 74, 397-404.
Liberman, N., & Klar, Y. (1996). Hypothesis testing
in Wason's selection task: Social exchange cheating
detection or task understanding. Cognition, 58,
127-156.
Lichtenstein, S., & Fischhoff, B. (1977). Do those
who know more also know more about how much
they know? Organizational Behavior and Human
Performance, 20, 159-183.
Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D.
(1977). Calibration of probabilities: The state of
the art. In H. Jungermann & G. de Zeeuw (Eds.),
Decision making and change in human affairs (pp.
275-324). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
Lingle, J. H., & Ostrom, T. M. (1981). Principles of
memory and cognition in attitude formation. In
R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.),
Cognitive responses in persuasive communications:
A text in attitude change (pp. 399-420).
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Loftus, E. F, & Wagenaar, W. A. (1988). Lawyers'
predictions of success. Jurimetrics Journal, 28,
437^53.
Lord, C. G., Lepper, M. R., & Preston, E. (1984).
Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for
social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 47, 1231-1243.
Lord, C, Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased
assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects
of prior theories on subsequently considered
evidence. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 37, 2098-2109.
Luchins, A. S. (1942). Mechanization in problem
solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological
Monographs, 54, 1-95.
Luchins, A. S. (1957). Experimental attempts to
minimize the impact of first impressions. In C. I.
Hovland (Ed.), The order of presentation in
persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University
Press.
Lusted, L. B. (1977). A study of the efficacy of
diagnostic reaiologic procedures: Final report on
diagnostic efficacy. Chicago: Efficacy Study Committee
of the American College of Radiology.
Lycan, W. C. (1988). Judgment and justification. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Maclntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?
Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mackay, C. (1932). Extraordinary popular delusions
and the madness of crowds (2nd ed.). Boston: Page.
(Original second edition published 1852)
Mahoney, M. J. (1976). Scientist as subject: The
psychological imperative. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Mahoney, M. J. (1977). Publication prejudices.
Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1, 161-175.
Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1990). Deontic
thought and the selection task. In K. J. Gilhooly,
M. T. G. Keane, R. H. Logic, & G. Erdos. (Eds.),
Lines of thinking (Vol. 1). London: Wiley.
Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1991). Social roles
and utilities in reasoning with deontic conditionals.
Cognition, 39, 85-105.
Manktelow, K. I., & Over, D. E. (1992). Utility and
deontic reasoning: Some comments on Johnson-
Laird and Byrne. Cognition, 43, 183-188.
Markovits, H., & Savary, F. (1992). Pragmatic
schemas and the selection task. Quarterly Journal
of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 133-148.