25.04.2013 Views

Case Study 1: Matarraña River Basin - Euwareness

Case Study 1: Matarraña River Basin - Euwareness

Case Study 1: Matarraña River Basin - Euwareness

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

They may constitute in a Central<br />

Users Junta<br />

Collects the tax from users to be<br />

paid to the CHE<br />

23<br />

Central Union for the <strong>Matarraña</strong> river<br />

basin<br />

High level of influence regarding<br />

decisions on the watering out of the<br />

Pena dam and the distribution of<br />

water<br />

A few irrigation communities do not<br />

pay for the tax and the remaining<br />

communities pay for it<br />

Regarding the CHE and the Central Unions’s functions, there are also some<br />

disadjustments between legal aspects and real practices. The CHE has been assigned<br />

with certain functions, including the elaboration of the Ebro river basin plan, and<br />

regulates the <strong>Matarraña</strong> river basin: it promotes regulation works, it collects the<br />

infrastructure tax (through the Central Union), it grants for concessions, and it registers<br />

them in the Water Register. It also plays a more ‘policy’ role by negotiating with the<br />

Central Union and the irrigation communities. However, the CHE is perceived in the<br />

territory as being a bureaucracy that ignores the real problems of the river basin and<br />

any decision it takes is perceived by many river basin actors as an undesirable<br />

inference. To certain extent, the CHE seems to accept playing an ‘outsider’ role and<br />

seems to prefer leaving the river basin to self-regulate. As a matter of fact, the CHE<br />

has been passive in relation to illegal users and to the registration of concessions in the<br />

Water Register. In addition, there is a common perception that the Central Union —and<br />

not the CHE— is the most influential actor in the regulation of the river basin.<br />

Finally, regarding users communities, in the municipality of Beceite, irrigation uses in<br />

this municipality date back to the Middle Ages. There is a dozen irrigation channels in<br />

Beceite but only three of them had regularised their concessions until fairly recently. In<br />

February 2000, the CHE threatened these irrigation channels to create a Users Union<br />

(as provided by the 29/1985 Water Act) otherwise they could lose their water<br />

concessions. In March 2000 the irrigation communities in Beceite created the Water<br />

Users Board of Beceite in order to keep their concessions. However, they are not<br />

required to be members of the Central Union as they do not take water from the Pena<br />

dam but from the <strong>Matarraña</strong> and the Ulldemó rivers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!