- Page 1 and 2: Volume 106, Number 3 ISSN 0042-8639
- Page 3 and 4: The Volta Review Early Hearing Dete
- Page 5 and 6: The Volta Review, Volume 106(3) (mo
- Page 7 and 8: Center at Bar Ilan University, Rama
- Page 9 and 10: identified the most significant pre
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 1. Percentage of newborns sc
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 2. Percentage of infants and
- Page 15 and 16: components will contribute to impro
- Page 17 and 18: that includes timelines and provide
- Page 19: 1991, there is only about $1,000 av
- Page 23 and 24: Historically, the federal Departmen
- Page 25 and 26: with unilateral profound losses, bi
- Page 27 and 28: Culbertson, J., & Gilbert, A.M. (19
- Page 29 and 30: Office of Special Education and Reh
- Page 31 and 32: University of North Carolina at Cha
- Page 33 and 34: When children begin to walk and the
- Page 35 and 36: years is attributable to partnershi
- Page 37 and 38: hearing loss, including audiologic
- Page 39 and 40: infants and toddlers who are deaf o
- Page 41 and 42: early intervention program personne
- Page 43 and 44: audiology symposium that brings tog
- Page 45 and 46: Cyndie Bennett, superintendent of t
- Page 47 and 48: 2001), places an emphasis on parent
- Page 49 and 50: family involvement strongly influen
- Page 51 and 52: Table 1. Demographic Characteristic
- Page 53 and 54: In the self-efficacy section, mothe
- Page 55 and 56: the Reynell Developmental Language
- Page 57 and 58: Table 4. Definitions and Examples o
- Page 59 and 60: Table 6. Relationships Between Mate
- Page 61 and 62: Table 8. Summary of Regression Mode
- Page 63 and 64: Roper & Dunst, 2003). Everyday occu
- Page 65 and 66: References Akey, T., Marquis, J., &
- Page 67 and 68: Lerner, G. (1952). Mr. Potato Head
- Page 69 and 70: Appendix Scale of Parent Involvemen
- Page 71 and 72:
Parents want to know why their chil
- Page 73 and 74:
Incidence of UHL Impact of UHL Defi
- Page 75 and 76:
Children with UHL are at risk for a
- Page 77 and 78:
with this population of children to
- Page 79 and 80:
who have UHL and the BAHA implant s
- Page 81 and 82:
Progression of hearing loss is a co
- Page 83 and 84:
ongoing services because of a speci
- Page 85 and 86:
Environmental and Acoustic Modifica
- Page 87 and 88:
negative effects of unilateral hear
- Page 89 and 90:
of children with unilateral sensori
- Page 91 and 92:
The Volta Review, Volume 106(3) (mo
- Page 93 and 94:
Theories on Speech Development Theo
- Page 95 and 96:
indicating an interaction of a norm
- Page 97 and 98:
as Spanish, automatically there are
- Page 99 and 100:
In summary, young children with sev
- Page 101 and 102:
documenting speech production patte
- Page 103 and 104:
were determined by the child’s pr
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 1. Observed-to-Expected Ratio
- Page 107 and 108:
His Spanish language use did impact
- Page 109 and 110:
implants: Profiles and implications
- Page 111 and 112:
http://eire.census.gov/popest/data/
- Page 113 and 114:
Introduction Since the early 1980s,
- Page 115 and 116:
delayed, thereby increasing parenta
- Page 117 and 118:
fitting the second processor easier
- Page 119 and 120:
quickly and naturally. Children who
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 2. Graphic example of a loud
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 2. Patients Patient ID Time L
- Page 125 and 126:
Speech Discrimination Tasks In addi
- Page 127 and 128:
The last two children with equal mo
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 7. Loudspeaker arrangement f
- Page 131 and 132:
children will retain monaural stimu
- Page 133 and 134:
van Hoesel, R., Tong, Y., Hallow, R
- Page 135 and 136:
with hearing loss who receive early
- Page 137 and 138:
5 years (i.e., met the age cut-off
- Page 139 and 140:
location. Informed consent was obta
- Page 141 and 142:
Figure 1. Loneliness score and age
- Page 143 and 144:
analysis was conducted to determine
- Page 145 and 146:
eceive cochlear implants, significa
- Page 147 and 148:
effective public school programs fo
- Page 149 and 150:
The Volta Review, Volume 106(3) (mo
- Page 151 and 152:
for promoting EHDI in developing co
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 1. Levels of Prevention for C
- Page 155 and 156:
or unilateral hearing loss because
- Page 157 and 158:
were usually higher when babies wer
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 2. World Bank Classification
- Page 161 and 162:
total public expenditure (Gottret &
- Page 163 and 164:
is more cost effective to institute
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 2. Proportion of births in h
- Page 167 and 168:
scant, although they are likely to
- Page 169 and 170:
a widely reported controversy conce
- Page 171 and 172:
their babies at such an early age b
- Page 173 and 174:
active, ongoing, culturally appropr
- Page 175 and 176:
this goal achievable. Reservations
- Page 177 and 178:
Clemens, C.J., Davis, S.A., & Baile
- Page 179 and 180:
Kale, R. (1995). Traditional healer
- Page 181 and 182:
A dream realized or nightmare in th
- Page 183 and 184:
Penn, C. (1998). The study of child
- Page 185 and 186:
Watkin, P.M., Baldwin, M., & McEner
- Page 187 and 188:
The Volta Review, Volume 106(3) (mo
- Page 189 and 190:
education or general education, the
- Page 191 and 192:
for both developmental and remedial
- Page 193 and 194:
Table 1. Type and Number of RSP Con
- Page 195 and 196:
process of closing the language gap
- Page 197 and 198:
phonologic and phonemic awareness;
- Page 199 and 200:
Westchester Institute for Human Ser
- Page 201:
Bohnert, Andrea; Spitzlei, Vera; Li