27.04.2013 Views

Geophysical Abstracts 152 January-March 1953

Geophysical Abstracts 152 January-March 1953

Geophysical Abstracts 152 January-March 1953

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ELECTRICITY 27<br />

14260. Oberlin, L. M. Apparatus for determining permeability, U. S. Patent<br />

2,632,324, granted <strong>March</strong> 24, <strong>1953</strong>. 9 claims. Assigned to Phillips<br />

Petroleum Co.<br />

An electrical potential apparatus for determining permeability of rock forma­<br />

tions from a borehole.<br />

14261. Boucher, F. G. Retractable electrode for well-casing measurements, U. S.<br />

patent 2,632,795, granted <strong>March</strong> 24,<strong>1953</strong>. 4 claims. Assigned to Stand­<br />

ard Oil Development Co.<br />

Eroding, R. A. Magnetic induction well-logging instrument. See Abstract<br />

14238.<br />

METHODS OF ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION<br />

14262. Unz, M. Apparent resistivity curves for dipping beds: Geophysics, v.<br />

18, no. 1, p. 116-137,<strong>1953</strong>.<br />

The problem of resistivity measurements over dipping beds is studied, using<br />

the method of images. Using the analog of mirrors replacing the resistivity<br />

contrasts, Unz points out that the method of images satisfies the boundary condi­<br />

tions of the electrical problem only when the distribution of images is sym­<br />

metrical about the point of intersection of the dipping bed with the surface.<br />

Thus, accurate calculations of potential may be made only when the lower bed<br />

has infinite conductivity or resistivity, and only for certain dip angles. With<br />

intermediate resistivity contrasts, solutions by the method of images are in­<br />

correct, but the errors are small for small values of resistivity contrast and for<br />

large dip angles. A number of examples of calculated curves are presented.<br />

An example is given also of the application of the curves to practical problems.<br />

O. V. K.<br />

14263. Palmer, L. S., and Hough, J. M. Geoelectrical resistivity measurements:<br />

Mining Mag., v. 88, no. 1, p. 16-22,<strong>1953</strong>.<br />

The theoretical relationship is obtained between inflection points of resistivity<br />

and current-electrode-spacing curves and depth of boundaries. This relationship<br />

is used to interpret inflection points of experimental curves obtained on the<br />

Holderness Plain in Yorkshire, where chalk beds are covered by glacial boulder<br />

clays of low resistivity. Results were found to be better than those obtained<br />

from empirical formulae and were generally in agreement with borehole<br />

information.<br />

The theoretical relationship between minimum (or maximum) resistivity and<br />

electrode spacing was obtained from simplifying assumptions and was found to<br />

have limited application to three-layer curves. H. R. J.<br />

14264. Gorelik, A. M. Opredeleniye napravleniya techeniya podzemnykh vod po<br />

noblyudeniyam elektricheskogo polya fll'tratsii [Determination of the<br />

direction of streaming underground water from the observed electric<br />

field caused by filtration]: Akad. Nauk SSSR Izv., Ser. geofiz. no. 6,<br />

p. 55-56, 1952.<br />

A study was made to determine the direction of an underground stream of<br />

water from the electric field caused by electrofiltration, as it is observed on the<br />

ground. The basic law of diffusion potential produced by porous formations<br />

through which a fluid is flowing can be stated as E=Pk^/4iraff ; that is the gradient

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!