30.04.2013 Views

Excimer laser refractive surgery : corneal wound ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

Excimer laser refractive surgery : corneal wound ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

Excimer laser refractive surgery : corneal wound ... - Helda - Helsinki.fi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of 10 kHz requiring relatively a long time of flap creation, but, nowadays the current FS<br />

<strong>laser</strong> <strong>fi</strong>res at a rate of 60 kHz resulting in much lower times for flap creation. Fifth<br />

generation FS have even reached a <strong>fi</strong>ring rate of 150 kHz further reducing the flap creation<br />

time and decreasing the energy needed. The major advantages of FS <strong>laser</strong> systems over<br />

microkeratomes are increase in flap homogeneity and a higher rate of reproducibility. A<br />

capacity to create flaps of different diameters and thicknesses, even under 90 µm have<br />

decrease the flaps related complications (Durrie and Kezirian 2005, Kezirian and<br />

Stonecipher 2004) and increases postoperative flap adhesion (Knorz and Vossmerbaeumer<br />

2008). Complications with FS are rare, being most commonly transient light-sensitive<br />

syndrome (TLSS) and diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK). The mechanism of TLSS is still<br />

unknown, yet it seems to be secondary to an inflammatory response to the gas bubbles or<br />

keratocytes’ response to <strong>laser</strong> ablation.<br />

Postoperative visual outcomes between microkeratomes and FS have not shown any<br />

differences (Javaloy et al. 2007, Montes-Mico et al. 2007a), although the contrast<br />

sensitivity seems to be better after FS (Montes-Mico et al. 2007b), yet the complication<br />

rate between both groups is similar (Moshirfar et al. 2010).<br />

2.4 CORNEAL WOUND HEALING<br />

Wound healing is essential to maintain the transparency and optical properties of the<br />

cornea. Physiology diversity in response to injury is a major factor in outcome results after<br />

<strong>refractive</strong> <strong>surgery</strong>. PRK and LASIK differ in the intensity of <strong>corneal</strong> <strong>wound</strong> healing. This<br />

difference seems to be secondary to the preservation of epithelium and Bowman’s layer<br />

after LASIK (Ambrosio and Wilson 2003, Helena et al. 1998, Mohan et al. 2003, Tervo<br />

and Moilanen 2003, Wilson et al. 2007) and the amount of depth of photoablation in both<br />

procedures (Moller-Pedersen et al. 1998, Moller-Pedersen et al. 2000).<br />

The mechanisms behind <strong>corneal</strong> <strong>wound</strong> healing response form a complex cascade of<br />

events involving epithelial cells, keratocytes, <strong>corneal</strong> nerves, lacrimal glands, tear <strong>fi</strong>lm,<br />

and cells of the immune system. Cytokines and growth factors are the soluble factors that<br />

mediate the signals and interaction between different cells and components to restore<br />

<strong>corneal</strong> functionality. In the following I will describe <strong>corneal</strong> <strong>wound</strong> response in different<br />

layers of the cornea in more detail.<br />

Epithelial <strong>corneal</strong> debridment from its basement membrane generates apoptosis in<br />

keratocytes followed by simple epithelial replacement by mitosis without any <strong>fi</strong>brosis. If<br />

epithelial injury compromises the basement membrane it stimulates a <strong>fi</strong>brotic response<br />

(Zieske et al. 2001). In the case of PRK the <strong>fi</strong>brotic response involves a higher area<br />

compared to LASIK in which the <strong>fi</strong>brosis response is limited to the edges of the flap<br />

created by the microkeratome.<br />

Immediately after an epithelial injury an anterior stromal keratocyte apoptosis can be<br />

observed (Dupps and Wilson 2006, Wilson et al. 1996). This continues for at least one<br />

week. This response is mediated by the release of cytokines such as Interleukin (IL)-<br />

1(Wilson et al. 1996), tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α (Wilson et al. 2001), epidermal<br />

growth factor (EGF) and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) (Tuominen et al. 2001).<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!