Namibia - CountryWatch

More documents

Recommendations

Info

International Environmental Agreements and Associations Environmental Overview International Environmental Agreements and Associations International Policy Development in Regard to Global Warming: Introduction Regardless of what the precise nature of the relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and global warming may be, it seems that there is some degree of a connection between the phenomena. Any substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and global warming trends will likely involve systematic changes in industrial operations, the use of advanced energy sources and technologies, as well as global cooperation in implementing and regulating these transformations. In this regard, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) stipulated the following objectives: 1. To stabilize "greenhouse gas" concentrations within the atmosphere, in such a manner that would preclude hazardous anthropogenic intervention into the existing biosphere and ecosystems of the world. This stabilization process would facilitate the natural adaptation of ecosystems to changes in climate. 2. To ensure and enable sustainable development and food production on a global scale. Following are two discusssions regarding international policies on the environment, followed by listings of international accords. Special Entry: The Kyoto Protocol The UNFCCC was adopted at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992, and entered into force in 1994. Over 175 parties were official participants. Meanwhile, however, many of the larger, more industrialized nations failed to reach the emissions' reduction targets, and many UNFCCC members agreed that the voluntary approach to reducing emissions had not been successful. As such, UNFCCC members reached a consensus that legally binding limits were necessitated, and agreed to discuss such a legal paradigm at a meeting in Kyoto, Japan in 1997. At that meeting, the UNFCCC forged the Kyoto Protocol. This concord is the first legally binding international agreement that places limits on emissions from industrialized countries. The major greenhouse gas emissions addressed in the Kyoto Protocol include carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride, and methane. 211 <strong>Namibia</strong> Review 2013
Environmental Overview International Environmental Agreements and Associa- The provisions of the Kyoto Protocol stipulate that economically advanced nations must reduce their combined emissions of greenhouse gases, by approximately five percent from their 1990 levels, before the 2008-2010 deadline. Countries with the highest carbon dioxide emissions, such as the United States (U.S.), many of the European Union (EU) countries, and Japan, are to reduce emissions by a scale of 6 to 8 percent. All economically advanced nations must show "demonstrable progress" by 2005. In contrast, no binding limits or timetable have been set on developing countries. Presumably, this distinction is due to the fact that most developing countries -- with the obvious exceptions of India and China -- simply do not emit as many greenhouse gases as do more industrially advanced countries. Meanwhile, these countries are entrenched in the process of economic development. Regardless of the aforementioned reasoning, there has been strong opposition against the asymmetrical treatment assigned to emissions limits among developed and developing countries. Although this distinction might be regarded as unfair in principle, associations such as the Alliance of Small Island States have been vocal in expressing how global warming -- a result of greenhouse gas emissions - has contributed to the rise in sea level, and thus deleteriously affected their very existence as island nation states. For this reason, some parties have suggested that economically advanced nations, upon returning to their 1990 levels, should be required to further reduce their greenhouse gas emissions by a deadline of 2005. In response, interested parties have observed that even if such reductions were undertaken by economically advanced nations, they would not be enough to completely control global warming. Indeed, a reduction in the rate of fossil fuel usage by developing nations would also be necessary to have substantial ameliorative effect on global warming. Indeed, a reduction in the rate of fossil fuel usage by developing nations would also be necessary to have substantial ameliorative effect on global warming. As such, the Protocol established a "Clean Development Mechanism" which permits developed countries to invest in projects aimed at reducing emissions within developing countries in return for credit for the reductions. Ostensibly, the objective of this mechanism is to curtail emissions in developing countries without unduly penalizing them for their economic development. Under this model, the countries with more potential emissions credits could sell them to other signatories of the Kyoto Protocol, whose emissions are forecast to significantly rise in the next few years. Should this trading of emissions credits take place, it is estimated that the Kyoto Protocol's emissions targets could still be met. In 1999, the International Energy Outlook projected that Eastern Europe, the former Soviet Union and Newly Independent States, as well as parts of Asia, are all expected to show a marked decrease in their level of energy-related carbon emissions in 2010. Nations with the highest emissions, specifically, the U.S., the EU and Japan, are anticipated to reduce their emissions by up to 8 percent by 2012. By 2000, however, the emissions targets were not on schedule for achievement. Indeed, the U.S. Department of Energy estimates forecast that by 2010, there will be a 34 percent increase in carbon emissions from the 1990 levels, in the absence of major shifts in policy, economic growth, energy prices, and consumer trends. Despite this assessment in the U.S., international support for the Kyoto Protocol remained strong, especially among European countries and island states, who view the pact as one step in the direction away from reliance on fossil fuels and other sources of greenhouse gases. In 2001, U.S. President, George W. Bush, rejected his country's participation in the Kyoto Protocol, saying that the costs imposed on the global economic system, and especially, on the US, overshadowed <strong>Namibia</strong> Review 2013 212
Page 1 and 2:
Namibia 2013 Country Review http://
Page 3:
CountryWatch COUNTRYWATCH REVIEW 20
Page 6 and 7:
Review Trade and the Exchange Rate
Page 8 and 9:
4 Review
Page 10 and 11:
Country Overview Country Overview C
Page 12 and 13:
Key Data Country Overview Religions
Page 14 and 15:
Key Data Country Overview Africa Re
Page 16 and 17:
History Political Overview Politica
Page 18 and 19:
History Political Overview South Af
Page 20 and 21:
Political Conditions Political Over
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Political Risk Index Political Over
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Political Stability Political Overv
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Freedom Rankings Political Overview
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Human Rights Political Overview con
Page 58 and 59:
Government Structure Political Over
Page 60 and 61:
Government Structure Political Over
Page 62 and 63:
Principal Government Officials Poli
Page 64 and 65:
Leader Biography Political Overview
Page 66 and 67:
Foreign Relations Political Overvie
Page 68 and 69:
Foreign Relations Political Overvie
Page 70 and 71:
National Security Political Overvie
Page 72 and 73:
Defense Forces Political Overview
Page 74 and 75:
Defense Forces Political Overview 6
Page 76 and 77:
Economic Overview Economic Overview
Page 78 and 79:
Real GDP and GDP Per Capita Economi
Page 80 and 81:
Trade and the Exchange Rate Economi
Page 82 and 83:
Energy Consumption and Production Q
Page 84 and 85:
Agriculture Consumption and Product
Page 86 and 87:
Metals Consumption and Production E
Page 88 and 89:
World Metals Pricing Summary Econom
Page 90 and 91:
Foreign Investment Climate Investme
Page 92 and 93:
Foreign Investment Index Investment
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Corruption Perceptions Index Invest
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Competitiveness Ranking Investment
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Taxation Investment Overview Method
Page 116 and 117:
Partner Links Investment Overview I
Page 118 and 119:
Partner Links Investment Overview E
Page 120 and 121:
Partner Links Investment Overview A
Page 122 and 123:
Partner Links Investment Overview T
Page 124 and 125:
Partner Links Investment Overview C
Page 126 and 127:
People Social Overview Social Overv
Page 128 and 129:
Human Development Index Social Over
Page 130 and 131:
Human Development Index Social Over
Page 132 and 133:
Life Satisfaction Index Social Over
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Happy Planet Index Social Overview
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Status of Women Social Overview Sou
Page 148 and 149:
Global Gender Gap Index Social Over
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Culture and Arts Social Overview :
Page 160 and 161:
Travel Information Social Overview
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171: Travel Information Social Overview
Page 172 and 173: Travel Information Social Overview
Page 174 and 175: Diseases/Health Data Social Overvie
Page 180 and 181: Environmental Issues Environmental
Page 182 and 183: Greenhouse Gas Ranking Environmenta
Page 190 and 191: Global Environmental Snapshot Envir
Page 202 and 203: Global Environmental Concepts Envir
Page 222 and 223: International Environmental Agreeme
Page 236 and 237: Bibliography Appendices Appendices
Page 238 and 239: Bibliography Appendices Foreign Gov
Page 240 and 241: Bibliography Appendices BP Statisti
Page 242 and 243: Bibliography Appendices Tonga Monac
Page 244 and 245: Bibliography Appendices United Stat
Page 246 and 247: Bibliography Appendices United Stat
Page 248 and 249: Bibliography Appendices USING COUNT
Page 250 and 251: Bibliography Appendices 241 Namibia
Page 252: CountryWatch CountryWatch is an inf
show all

Namibia - CountryWatch

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?