03.05.2013 Views

Namibia - CountryWatch

Namibia - CountryWatch

Namibia - CountryWatch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environmental Overview International Environmental Agreements and Associa-<br />

United States<br />

, the world's largest polluter. He also noted that any new agreement would have to include<br />

India<br />

and<br />

China<br />

-- significant producers of greenhouse gas emissions, but exempt from<br />

Kyoto<br />

because they have been classified as developing countries. Still, he said that progress on dealing with<br />

climate change had been stymied by "a reluctance to face up to reality and the practical action needed<br />

to tackle problem."<br />

Blair also touted the "huge opportunities" in technology and pointed toward the possibilities offered by<br />

wind, solar and nuclear power, along with fuel cell technology, eco-friendly biofuels, and carbon capture<br />

and storage which could generate low carbon power. Blair also asserted that his government was<br />

committed to achieving its domestic goal of reducing carbon dioxide emissions by 20 percent by<br />

2010.<br />

In the<br />

United States<br />

, President George W. Bush has said that global warming remained a debatable issue and despite conclusions<br />

reached by his own Environmental Protection Agency, he has not agreed with the conclusion<br />

that global warming and climate change are linked with human activities. Bush has also refused to ratify<br />

Kyoto<br />

on the basis of its economic costs.<br />

Australia<br />

, an ally of the<br />

United States<br />

, has taken a similarly dim view of the Kyoto Protocol. Ahead of the November 2005 climate change<br />

meeting in<br />

Canada<br />

in which new goals for the protocol were to be discussed,<br />

Australia<br />

's Environment Minister, Ian Campbell, said that negotiating new greenhouse gas emission levels for<br />

the Kyoto Protocol would be a waste of time.<br />

Campbell<br />

said, "There is a consensus that the caps, targets and timetables approach is flawed. If we spend the<br />

next five years arguing about that, we'll be fiddling and negotiating while<br />

Rome<br />

burns."<br />

Campbell<br />

, like the Bush administration, has also advocated a system of voluntary action in which industry takes<br />

up new technologies rather than as a result of compelling the reduction of emissions. But the Australian<br />

Conservation Foundation (ACF) has called on its government to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, to<br />

establish a system of emissions trading, and to set binding limits on emissions. Interestingly, although<br />

it did not sign on to<br />

Kyoto , Australia<br />

was expected to meet its emissions target by 2012 (an 8 percent increase in 1990 levels in keeping<br />

with the country's reliance on coal). But this success has nothing to do with new technologies and is<br />

due to state-based regulations on land clearing.<br />

Note: The Kyoto Protocol calls for developed nations to cut greenhouse emissions by 5.2 percent of<br />

1990 levels by 2012.<br />

<strong>Namibia</strong> Review 2013 214

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!