05.05.2013 Views

The Judical Officer - Dec 07 - Joasa.org.za

The Judical Officer - Dec 07 - Joasa.org.za

The Judical Officer - Dec 07 - Joasa.org.za

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

26<br />

(Please note that the following discussion from Albertyn & Kentridge is amended<br />

from the interim Constitution to the final Constitution.) Albertyn & Kentridge (1994:172-<br />

174) is of the opinion that section 9(2) acknowledges that remedial measures is<br />

necessary for the achievement of equality. That is why affirmative action policies must<br />

promote substantive equality.<br />

Van Reenen (1997:154-156, 161-162) is of the opinion that this section 9(2) is<br />

superfluous. Why ? Because Van Reenen is of the opinion that (a substantive<br />

interpretation of) section 9(1) already provides for affirmative action.<br />

8.2.3 Section 9(3) [“prohibition of unfair discrimination - vertical”]<br />

Please note that the right to equality in section 8(2) of the interim Constitution, is<br />

extended in section 9(3) of the final Constitution through the addition of the following<br />

listed listed grounds grounds: grounds<br />

(1) birth;<br />

(2) marital status; and<br />

(3) pregnancy.<br />

Section 9(3) of the Constitution stipulates that the state state state state may NOT unfairly unfairly<br />

unfairly<br />

discriminate directly or indirectly against any person on one or more of the following<br />

(listed) grounds:<br />

(1) birth;<br />

(2) marital status;<br />

(3) pregnancy;<br />

(4) race;<br />

(5) gender;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!