The Judical Officer - Dec 07 - Joasa.org.za
The Judical Officer - Dec 07 - Joasa.org.za
The Judical Officer - Dec 07 - Joasa.org.za
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
26<br />
(Please note that the following discussion from Albertyn & Kentridge is amended<br />
from the interim Constitution to the final Constitution.) Albertyn & Kentridge (1994:172-<br />
174) is of the opinion that section 9(2) acknowledges that remedial measures is<br />
necessary for the achievement of equality. That is why affirmative action policies must<br />
promote substantive equality.<br />
Van Reenen (1997:154-156, 161-162) is of the opinion that this section 9(2) is<br />
superfluous. Why ? Because Van Reenen is of the opinion that (a substantive<br />
interpretation of) section 9(1) already provides for affirmative action.<br />
8.2.3 Section 9(3) [“prohibition of unfair discrimination - vertical”]<br />
Please note that the right to equality in section 8(2) of the interim Constitution, is<br />
extended in section 9(3) of the final Constitution through the addition of the following<br />
listed listed grounds grounds: grounds<br />
(1) birth;<br />
(2) marital status; and<br />
(3) pregnancy.<br />
Section 9(3) of the Constitution stipulates that the state state state state may NOT unfairly unfairly<br />
unfairly<br />
discriminate directly or indirectly against any person on one or more of the following<br />
(listed) grounds:<br />
(1) birth;<br />
(2) marital status;<br />
(3) pregnancy;<br />
(4) race;<br />
(5) gender;