06.05.2013 Views

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What is Intelligence? 131<br />

anything? Why does pricking your finger feel like pain? Why does a<br />

red rose appear red?<br />

This has been dubbed the "hard problem" of consciousness, and<br />

some people have tried to explain it away by calling it an emergent<br />

property of active networks of neurons - in other words, something<br />

that arises from the interactions between these neurons, but which is<br />

not found in the neurons by themselves. That, however, seems a bit<br />

of a cop-out. What is more, this "explanatory gap" has attracted a<br />

number of oddball theories proposing weird quantum states that<br />

produce consciousness, mathematical explanations as to why<br />

synchronous oscillating brain waves may be the key, and so on.<br />

Some say that the gap will never be bridged because our brains are<br />

ill-equipped to understand their own consciousness. And some<br />

researchers argue that consciousness is just an illusion anyway.<br />

Helen Phillips<br />

7 What is sex for?<br />

SEX sells, and not just in popular culture. Biologists have been<br />

fascinated with it for more than 100 years and there's no danger of<br />

them losing interest.<br />

Why sex? Surely there is no mystery there - the reason 99.9 per cent<br />

of multicellular species reproduce sexually is because it is the best<br />

way of passing on your genes while ensuring there is plenty of<br />

variation in the next generation. But this argument has a fundamental<br />

flaw, which is the immediate and short-term wastefulness of sexual<br />

reproduction.<br />

Imagine a population of fish living in a lake and competing for limited<br />

food. The fish reproduce sexually so each new generation contains<br />

both females and males, all competing for the same resources. Now<br />

imagine that one fish discovers how to reproduce asexually. All her<br />

offspring are females, and in time they will all produce their own<br />

female offspring, without the wasteful need for males. In just a few<br />

generations the descendants of this single fish will outnumber their<br />

sexual rivals and drive them to extinction. In the day-to-day battle for<br />

survival, sex is a seriously losing strategy.<br />

In the long term, of course, this does not hold true. Without sex to<br />

shuffle the genetic pack, species accumulate harmful mutations and<br />

quickly go extinct. The majority of asexual species last only a few<br />

tens of thousands of years. But this is not a satisfactory explanation<br />

for the near-ubiquity of sex. Natural selection doesn't care what<br />

happens many generations into the future. To win the day, sex must<br />

confer benefits right here, right now. And that's where things get<br />

sticky.<br />

How does sex win? There have been dozens of suggestions, most of<br />

them focusing on its ability to generate variety. Because the<br />

environments in which species live can vary so much in space and<br />

time, the argument goes, only those that can adapt rapidly survive.<br />

One of the most popular versions of this idea concerns the neverending<br />

arms race between hosts and parasites. Problem solved.<br />

Except that no one has been able to prove that this accounts for the<br />

overwhelming dominance of sex in nature.<br />

Perhaps there is a way out of this conundrum. Sex may be

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!