06.05.2013 Views

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What is Intelligence? 46<br />

Chapter Five – Intellect and Intuition<br />

In the preceding chapter we asked the question why so many intellectuals<br />

turn out to be not very understanding people, lacking in what we regard<br />

as “commonsense.”<br />

As Krishnamurti put it, no doubt based upon long experience of the many<br />

scientists and academics whom he took part in discussions with:<br />

There are Ph D’s who couldn’t put a flower on the table.<br />

We are not here however particularly concerned with such practical<br />

skills, but with the ability to solve problems in the human world, and for<br />

that matter, in the material world in general.<br />

But our focus here is going to be on the social and psychological<br />

problems of mankind, because we think the rest can be solved easily<br />

enough, once the former are.<br />

However, what we are about to say is wholly relevant to the scientist who<br />

would seek to be a creative scientist, perhaps originating new scientific<br />

discoveries or even fields of study or technology, because as we are about<br />

to explain, his or her ability to do this will depend upon a correct inner<br />

perspective and an expanded understanding or the working of the human<br />

psyche, such as we now intend to provide.<br />

In science as in all other fields, there are the leaders and the followers.<br />

Not that there is any shame in being a follower. We can’t all be Einsteins<br />

discovering relativity, or Max Plancks creating a field such as quantum<br />

physics.<br />

The shame and crime however, is when a new leader emerges, and<br />

perhaps overturns the knowledge or theories of the former leaders, but all<br />

the followers who cannot see the correctness of his new findings stand in<br />

his way.<br />

Whilst we accept this process as inevitable in logical terms to some<br />

degree – that is, if the leaders were the equal of the followers, they would<br />

have come to the same conclusions already themselves – we feel that it is<br />

necessary to explain the psychology of what is going on in academia and

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!