07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog
07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog
07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
What is Intelligence? 33<br />
bring the entire race only to destruction whether those religious<br />
principles and beliefs have any basis in reality or not.<br />
Richard Dawkins recent assertion that religious belief is the cause of the<br />
global havoc is a total cop-out.<br />
The Muslim is strapping dynamite to him or herself and attacking the<br />
“enemy” with it, not because of religion, but because of the intolerance of<br />
the rest of the world to the Muslim way of life, and the desire of these<br />
powerful elite in the world to control their natural resources.<br />
Had the Muslims not been threatened and provoked, they would not be<br />
attacking the West, except perhaps for a few extremists and zealots who<br />
on their own could not achieve very much, lacking widespread support.<br />
If this seems unproven theory, let us give a fact.<br />
There was for example not ever any Muslim attack on England before<br />
July 7 th 2005 - in other words, after the British had engaged in the second<br />
Iraq war, and had been warned by terrorist leaders such as Osama Bin<br />
Laden to withdraw their forces repeatedly, long before any attack on<br />
Britain ever took place.<br />
Note also, that these words of the author are the impartial dispassionate<br />
opinion of a man who is neither a Muslim, nor a Jew, and was born and<br />
raised as a Christian and has no intention of converting to either faith, and<br />
has no desire and nothing to gain from his viewpoints, except the hope<br />
that someday there will be a comprehensive and enduring world peace.<br />
Just as Oppenheimer and the other scientists involved in the production of<br />
the first atom bomb wrestled with their consciences, let our modern<br />
scientists also wrestle with theirs, and cease where possible to allow the<br />
use of their high intelligence and extraordinary knowledge for low or<br />
destructive purposes, not good for the individual or the global society.<br />
For surely, any other action on the part of the intellectual elite, towards<br />
the mass of the people who are the comparatively non-intellectual nonelite,<br />
is an act of social destruction, and against any civilised, peaceful<br />
and evolutionarily sound organisation of mankind.