06.05.2013 Views

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

07.+What+is+Intelligence+(February+2006) - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What is Intelligence? 136<br />

It is clear from reading the above article, that science, despite its great<br />

achievements is in no way as “all knowing” as some scientists like<br />

Professor Dawkins and to some extent physicists like Stephen Hawking<br />

like to make out.<br />

The above confession by the UK’s leading and respected popular science<br />

journal New Scientist (i.e. the equivalent of the US Scientific American<br />

magazine) is really staggering in its admission of ignorance upon the<br />

major issues of all times, though this particular list has not even touched<br />

on the “origin of the universe” question, which also is still under debate,<br />

with the current thinking favouring “the Big Bang Theory” first suggested<br />

by George Gamow.<br />

The trouble with modern science in particular is that its practitioners have<br />

the habit of deciding that when they have made some new discovery they<br />

have found “the final answer”, or are just a mere step away from<br />

discovering the “ultimate.”<br />

But a few years down the line, somebody comes up with some<br />

unexpected “finding” which rocks the current theories, which they<br />

previously imagined to be the ultimate picture of reality.<br />

Science has indeed made some marvellous advances, but we find that is it<br />

often far more flawed and uncertain it its theories than the scientists like<br />

to admit.<br />

Throughout the history of science, amongst the advances, have been some<br />

nearly shameless efforts to get the facts to fit the favoured theory at all<br />

costs.<br />

In particular, a large mass of scientists reject and label “heresy”, what<br />

others consider to be proven fact such as Bell’s “action at a distance”<br />

quantum physics experiment, in which two particles are apparently<br />

proven to be interacting with one another instantly, beyond the effect of<br />

any force or field science has ever previously encountered, which it has<br />

long been assumed since Einstein has the maximum potential of operating<br />

at the speed of light.<br />

We were told by Einstein and convinced up until the Bell experiment,<br />

that nothing could travel faster than the speed of light, and that such<br />

instantaneous “action at a distance” was impossible.<br />

But it seem now even Einstein has been overturned by Bell’s work.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!