21.05.2013 Views

Import Risk Analysis - Biosecurity New Zealand

Import Risk Analysis - Biosecurity New Zealand

Import Risk Analysis - Biosecurity New Zealand

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Establishment of the disease could result in rare cases of disease in humans.<br />

Dog owners, veterinary and laboratory personnel would be occupationally exposed to<br />

infection, particularly when whelping infected dogs.<br />

Effects on the environment would be negligible since there are no wild dog populations.<br />

Since B. canis could establish and result in reproductive disease in dogs and rare human<br />

infections the consequences are assessed to be non-negligible.<br />

8.2.4. <strong>Risk</strong> estimation<br />

The likelihood of introduction is non-negligible for dogs and dogs’ semen from countries<br />

where B. canis is present. The likelihood of exposure is non-negligible and the consequences<br />

are considered non-negligible should establishment occur.<br />

As a result the risk estimate for B. canis is non-negligible and it is classified as a hazard in the<br />

commodity. Therefore risk management measures can be justified.<br />

<strong>Risk</strong> management measures are not justified for cats.<br />

8.3. RISK MANAGEMENT<br />

8.3.1. Options<br />

The Code makes no recommendations that would prevent B. canis being introduced into an<br />

importing country with dogs or dogs’ semen.<br />

8.3.1.1. Dogs<br />

Quarantine is not an option since infection is generally subclinical and chronic. No vaccine is<br />

available and antibiotic therapy is often ineffective because of the persistent intracellular<br />

location of B. canis infection.<br />

Diagnostic testing to identify carrier dogs is the only feasible option. Serological testing is the<br />

most frequently used diagnostic method (Greene & Carmichael 2006). There are at least<br />

seven serological tests that may be employed to detect antibodies to B. canis. Each has its<br />

advantages and disadvantages dependent on sensitivity, specificity and how early antibodies<br />

can be detected post-infection. Haemoculture and detection of bacterial DNA using PCR are<br />

the other diagnostic testing options that may be considered, either alone or in various<br />

combinations with serological testing.<br />

The following testing options presented in ascending order of stringency are available for the<br />

effective management of B. canis in the commodity.<br />

Option 1.<br />

Within the 7 days prior to shipment, dogs could be serologically tested. The rapid slide<br />

agglutination test is highly sensitive but lacks specificity since reactions to other infecting<br />

bacterial organisms such as Pseudomonas may occur. It could be used as a screening test. A<br />

positive result could be followed by either a tube agglutination test or agar gel<br />

immunodiffusion test. Any titre of 1:50 or greater in the tube agglutination test could be<br />

22 • <strong>Import</strong> risk analysis: Cats, dogs and canine semen MAF <strong>Biosecurity</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!