30.05.2013 Views

PW_mar13_sample_issue

PW_mar13_sample_issue

PW_mar13_sample_issue

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

physicsworld.com<br />

UK<br />

Cumbria rejects hosting nuclear-waste repository<br />

The UK government will have to<br />

look elsewhere to store its mounting<br />

nuclear waste after plans were<br />

rejected to assess sites in Cumbria<br />

for a £12bn underground nuclearwaste<br />

repository. On 30 January<br />

seven of the 10 members of Cumbria<br />

County Council cabinet voted<br />

against a proposal to build an underground<br />

laboratory in the region that<br />

would have acted as a testbed for a<br />

full-scale storage. District councils<br />

in west Cumbria are now hoping that<br />

the veto – the second in 14 years –<br />

will be overruled by the government.<br />

The UK has been generating<br />

nuclear waste since its first nuclear<br />

power station fired up in 1956. Since<br />

then the country has accumulated<br />

some 470 000 m 3 of waste, which<br />

could remain dangerously radioactive<br />

for up to a million years. Most<br />

of the high- and intermediate-level<br />

waste is currently in temporary<br />

above-ground storage at the Sellafield<br />

nuclear- reprocessing site in<br />

west Cumbria. The UK government,<br />

however, would like to find a<br />

permanent place to store the waste<br />

because of fears that the storage at<br />

Sellafield is deteriorating. Indeed,<br />

last year the UK’s National Audit<br />

Office reported that Sellafield’s<br />

storage posed an “intolerable risk”<br />

to people and the environment.<br />

Cumbria has been seen as a possible<br />

site to permanently store the<br />

waste underground at depths of<br />

up to 1 km because of the existing<br />

nuclear facilities at Sellafield. However,<br />

some geoscientists are opposed<br />

to underground storage in the region<br />

because it is thought to contain<br />

unstable geology such as rock fractures,<br />

which can allow the spread of<br />

waste-leeching groundwater. There<br />

are also concerns that underground<br />

waste would threaten tourism at the<br />

nearby Lake District National Park.<br />

Stuart Haszeldine, a geoscientist<br />

at the University of Edinburgh who<br />

has investigated Cumbria’s suitability<br />

for underground nuclear-waste<br />

storage, told Physics World that he<br />

was pleased with the outcome. “It<br />

was quite unexpected to win,” he<br />

says. “I didn’t think Cumbria County<br />

Council would have such good judge-<br />

Risk concerns<br />

Cumbria in the UK is<br />

already home to the<br />

Sellafield nuclear<br />

reprocessing site,<br />

which closely<br />

monitors its<br />

environmental<br />

impact, but now the<br />

region’s council has<br />

rejected a proposed<br />

£12bn underground<br />

nuclear-waste<br />

repository.<br />

Space science<br />

Satellite sets path for South Korean space missions<br />

South Korea has succeeded in launching<br />

a satellite into orbit after months of<br />

delays and following two failed attempts<br />

in 2009 and 2010. The probe – dubbed<br />

the Science and Technology Satellite<br />

2C (STSAT-2C) – took off at the end of<br />

January from the Naro Space Center,<br />

located around 480 km south of Seoul.<br />

Scientific payloads aboard the probe<br />

include an instrument to monitor<br />

radiation levels as well as an altimeter<br />

to provide precise information about the<br />

satellite’s orbit.<br />

Shortly after lift-off, the Korean<br />

ministry of education, science and<br />

technology announced that STSAT-2C<br />

had successfully deployed in a low-Earth<br />

orbit, while contact with ground stations<br />

was made 11 hours later, confirming<br />

the target orbit of 297 km by 1512 km.<br />

“[The rocket] proved that Korea has<br />

the ability to launch a space vehicle.<br />

This space technology represents<br />

the [high] standard of our country’s<br />

science and technology,” Yeong Hak<br />

Kim, a government official at the Korean<br />

ministry of education, science and<br />

technology, told Physics World.<br />

The probe was launched by Korea’s<br />

Space Launch Vehicle (KSLV-1), also<br />

known as Naro, which is a two-stage<br />

carrier rocket that, when fully loaded,<br />

stands 33 m tall and has a mass of<br />

around 140 000 kg. The first stage of the<br />

launch vehicle was designed and built<br />

by Russia’s Khrunichev State Research<br />

and Production Space Center, while<br />

the second stage was developed by the<br />

The project is a<br />

demonstration<br />

of South<br />

Korea’s<br />

growing space<br />

prowess<br />

News & Analysis<br />

ment.” Haszeldine believes that<br />

other parts of the UK would be more<br />

geologically suitable for the con-<br />

struction of an underground storage<br />

facility, such as around the defunct<br />

nuclear power station in Oldbury,<br />

near Bristol.<br />

Many, however, are frustrated by<br />

the vote’s outcome. UK energy secretary<br />

Edward Davey says it was “disappointing”,<br />

adding that the decision<br />

will “not undermine prospects<br />

for new nuclear power stations”.<br />

Meanwhile, council leaders from<br />

Copeland – the district that hosts<br />

Sellafield – and from neighbouring<br />

Allerdale have written to the government<br />

to ask if there is still a way that<br />

west Cumbria can be considered for<br />

long-term nuclear-waste storage.<br />

Councillor Elaine Woodburn of<br />

Copeland told Physics World that<br />

more than two-thirds of Copeland<br />

residents wanted to see west Cumbria<br />

reconsidered, and that some<br />

geological experts would like to see<br />

a more detailed investigation. “The<br />

impact of hosting over 70% of this<br />

country’s waste is felt economically,<br />

environmentally and socially,” says<br />

Woodburn. “Whether it stays or<br />

goes, it affects us, so we need to be<br />

part of the solution. Whether [that]<br />

solution is in Copeland, I don’t know;<br />

we don’t have the facts to allow that<br />

decision to be taken.”<br />

Jon Cartwright<br />

Korea Aerospace Research Institute.<br />

The immediate scientific value of<br />

the satellite will be relatively small<br />

with the project being more of a<br />

demonstration of South Korea’s growing<br />

space prowess. Indeed, North Korea’s<br />

apparent success in launching a longrange<br />

rocket in January put pressure<br />

on Seoul to ensure that KSLV-1’s space<br />

flight went to plan. Both countries on<br />

the Korean peninsula are now members<br />

of the exclusive group of 11 nations that<br />

have independently launched satellites<br />

from their own territory. However, South<br />

Korea will still have to make significant<br />

progress before comparisons can be<br />

drawn with other space-faring nations<br />

such as China and Japan.<br />

Toby Brown<br />

Physics World March 2013 11<br />

Sellafield Ltd

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!