30.05.2013 Views

PW_mar13_sample_issue

PW_mar13_sample_issue

PW_mar13_sample_issue

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Volker Steger/Science Photo Library<br />

Quantum frontiers: The lowdown<br />

Beam me up<br />

Entangled photons<br />

can be used for<br />

quantum<br />

teleportation,<br />

quantum computing<br />

and possibly even<br />

secure satellite<br />

communications.<br />

32<br />

world according to quantum physics, we can still use<br />

quantum systems to develop new technologies. One<br />

of the key advantages of quantum systems is their<br />

universality – in other words, every quantum system<br />

of sufficient complexity should be able to simulate<br />

efficiently every other quantum system. One of the<br />

most developed quantum simulators at present uses<br />

atoms cooled down to near absolute zero. The interactions<br />

between these cold atoms can be tuned so<br />

well in the laboratory that they can be made to interact<br />

in many different ways, allowing them to simulate<br />

the behaviour of other systems. This is useful first<br />

and foremost because some physical systems, such<br />

as high­temperature superconductors, are so complicated<br />

that it is difficult to determine their exact<br />

quantum description by measuring them directly.<br />

Simulating their behaviour with atoms lets us extract<br />

what we believe to be the essence. More over, we can<br />

also simulate the behaviour of systems we are not<br />

even sure exist in nature.<br />

For example, Majorana fermions are meant to be<br />

fermionic particles (like electrons), but at the same<br />

time they are their own antiparticles (unlike electrons).<br />

At present only bosons, such as photons, are<br />

known to also be their own antiparticles so we do<br />

not really know if Majorana fermions exist. Interestingly,<br />

this does not prevent us from simulating them<br />

with cold atoms. But is our ability to simulate things<br />

that nature does not create itself a deep and fundamental<br />

property of the universe? Or is nature’s way<br />

of making Majorana fermions first to make humans<br />

who then figure out how to artificially make (i.e.<br />

simulate) Majorana fermions? To paraphrase Bohr,<br />

a physicist is just a Majorana fermion’s way of creating<br />

itself. Immanuel Bloch explores this fascinating<br />

topic for us on pages 47–50.<br />

Beyond the physics lab<br />

Quantum physics may often sound like science fiction,<br />

but surely Bohr, Einstein or any of its founders<br />

would never have believed that it might one day be<br />

possible to do quantum experiments in space. The<br />

main motive for taking quantum experiments to this<br />

new frontier is that if our future communication technology<br />

is to be fully quantum, it will involve quantum<br />

physicsworld.com<br />

communication between quantum computers based<br />

on Earth and on satellites. The current world record<br />

in distant quantum­information processing is held<br />

by Anton Zeilinger and colleagues, who teleported<br />

a quantum bit across a distance of 143 km between<br />

the Canary Islands of La Palma and Tenerife. This<br />

terrestrial record will be smashed once we move into<br />

space – the fact that there are very few atoms around<br />

eliminates a great deal of the noise we have to face<br />

when doing experiments on Earth.<br />

Performing quantum experiments in space will<br />

also allow us to test fundamental physics theories in<br />

regimes we have never before been able to access.<br />

That is because it will let us send signals over large<br />

distances, between platforms moving at large relative<br />

speeds, all in near­vacuum conditions. Indeed, certain<br />

tests of alternative theories to quantum physics,<br />

such as Penrose’s gravitationally induced collapse,<br />

are only realistically possible in space. The problem<br />

is the measurements required are very sensitive since<br />

the effects postulated at the boundary of quantum<br />

physics and gravity are rather meagre and any other<br />

potential noise needs to be eliminated. For more on<br />

this fascinating topic of space­based quantum physics,<br />

check out the article by Brendon Higgins and<br />

Thomas Jennewein (pp52–56).<br />

Quantum physics is also proving useful in our<br />

understanding of biology, which has traditionally<br />

been based on classical physics given that biological<br />

mole cules are so large, warm and wet. After<br />

all, systems that interact strongly with their environment<br />

(and so are warm and wet) cannot behave<br />

coherently because the environment itself impedes<br />

quantum coherence. Moreover, large molecules<br />

have many more ways in which quantum coherence<br />

can be destroyed. However, we are now discovering<br />

that biology may use some of the more sophisticated<br />

quantum tricks to improve its processing.<br />

One interesting case, which Jim Al­Khalili explains,<br />

is the possibility that DNA mutations are the result<br />

of the quantum tunnelling of hydrogen (pp42–45).<br />

Other fascinating examples are bacteria implementing<br />

a quantum random walk to optimize photosynthesis,<br />

birds using entangled electrons to determine<br />

the inclination of the Earth’s magnetic field and the<br />

amazing possibility that we humans and other animals<br />

can smell quantum superpositions.<br />

Anybody’s guess<br />

So what of the future? I predict that in 2013 we will<br />

see the first implementation of quantum teleportation<br />

between satellites. We will also see the first<br />

cold­atom simulation of non­Abelian anyons (particles<br />

with a behaviour that lies somewhere between<br />

fermions and bosons). We will have more evidence<br />

that biological energy transport is fundamentally<br />

quantum mechanical. We will almost certainly still<br />

puzzle over the meaning of quantum measurement.<br />

And finally, I am convinced that another Nobel prize<br />

will be given for testing quantum­mechanical effects,<br />

most likely the existence of the Higgs boson.<br />

My predictions will almost certainly be wrong, but<br />

even if they are, quantum physics is guaranteed to<br />

keep us tantalized for many years to come. n<br />

Physics World March 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!