llGib

Summary of Comments: Several commenters stated that the
proposed rule runs counter to the shared U.S.-Canada vision of
the Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC) initiative.
Agency Response: As explained previously, in order to
implement mandatory country of origin labeling for certain meat
products as required by statute in a manner consistent with U.S.
WTO obligations, the Agency has made these changes to the
labeling provisions for muscle cut covered commodities, which
provide consumers with more specific information and enhance the
overall operation of the program. The United States values its
relationships with its trading partners and is committed to
looking for ways to improve regulatory transparency and
coordination with Canada as described in the RCC Joint Action
Plan.
Summary of Comments: Several commenters stated their
opinion that there is no regulatory solution that will bring the
United States into compliance with its international trade
obligations. The commenters further stated that the United
States should seek a legislative change.
Agency Response: As discussed above, the Agency considers
that this final rule constitutes compliance with the WTO DSB's
recommendations and rulings.
Summary of Comments: One commenter suggested that the
Agency should expand the civil rights review statement to ensure
26