llGib

minimize down time and processing line changes and that,
ultimately, a mix of solutions will be implemented by industry
participants to effectively meet the requirements of the final
rule. Over the long run, the Agency believes that initial
adjustment costs are not likely to persist and that firms will
continue to seek methods for efficient production and marketing
of the affected products.
Processors’ Ability to Source Animals
Summary of Comments: Several commenters discussed the
sourcing of animals and the impact the proposed changes will
have on these practices. The commenters contended that animals
from other countries are used to supplement domestic sources,
often on a seasonal basis, and that the proposed rule’s new
requirements may add sufficient burden that this form of
sourcing is no longer economically viable.
One commenter stated concern that his business will suffer
because current customers will no longer purchase his company’s
meat products, which are sometimes sourced from Canadian cattle,
because the customers will now have to change all of their
labeling. Two commenters stated that the proposed rule gives an
unfair advantage to those producers who do not rely on Canadian
pigs. A commenter suggested this would create incentives for
U.S. processors to use U.S. livestock over imported livestock.
Another commenter contended the proposed rule’s new requirements
36