01.06.2013 Views

Modeling of Wire Electrical Discharge Machining ... - IJETAE

Modeling of Wire Electrical Discharge Machining ... - IJETAE

Modeling of Wire Electrical Discharge Machining ... - IJETAE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering<br />

Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2012)<br />

<strong>Modeling</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Wire</strong> <strong>Electrical</strong> <strong>Discharge</strong> <strong>Machining</strong> Parameters<br />

Using Titanium Alloy (Ti-6AL-4V)<br />

Basil Kuriachen 1 , Dr. Josephkunju Paul 2 , Dr.Jose Mathew 3<br />

1 Research Scholar, Department <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology Calicut<br />

Kozhikode-673601, India<br />

2 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and HOD, Department <strong>of</strong> mechanical Engineering, MA College <strong>of</strong> Engineering Kothamangalam, India<br />

3 Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Department <strong>of</strong> Mechanical Engineering, National Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology Calicut<br />

Abstract— <strong>Wire</strong> electro discharge machining (WEDM) is a<br />

modification <strong>of</strong> electro discharge machining (EDM) which has<br />

been widely used for long time for cutting punches and dies,<br />

shaped pockets and other machine parts <strong>of</strong> electrically<br />

conducting work materials. Technology <strong>of</strong> the WEDM process<br />

is based on the conventional EDM sparking phenomenon,<br />

utilizing the widely accepted non contact technique <strong>of</strong><br />

material removal with a difference that spark is generated at<br />

the wire and work piece gap. Evolution <strong>of</strong> WEDM made<br />

drastic changes in the area <strong>of</strong> precision machining with<br />

highest degree <strong>of</strong> dimensional accuracy and surface finish. In<br />

this paper, two level full factorial techniques were used for<br />

modelling and predicting the surface roughness in WEDM <strong>of</strong><br />

titanium (Ti-6Al-4V) alloy. Surface roughness was taken as a<br />

response variable measured after machining and pulse ON<br />

time, pulse OFF time, voltage and dielectric flushing pressure<br />

were taken as input parameters. The level <strong>of</strong> importance <strong>of</strong><br />

the WEDM cutting parameters on the surface roughness was<br />

determined by using the analysis <strong>of</strong> variance method<br />

(ANOVA). A mathematical relation between the workpiece<br />

surface roughness and WEDM cutting parameters was<br />

established. This mathematical model may be used for<br />

evaluating the surface roughness without performing any<br />

experiments. The predicted values <strong>of</strong> surface roughness by the<br />

mathematical model were compared with the experimental<br />

values. It is observed that the predicted results agree with the<br />

experimental values within an error <strong>of</strong> 7 %.<br />

Keywords— Surface roughness, factorial design, WEDM,<br />

Titanium (Grade 5), DOE<br />

Kozhikode-673601, India<br />

1 basilkuriachen@gmail.com<br />

2 josephkunju.paul@gmail.com<br />

3 josmat@nitc.ac.in<br />

377<br />

I. INTRODUCTION<br />

WEDM is one <strong>of</strong> the non-traditional processes which is<br />

accepted globally to machine high strength to weight ratio<br />

materials mainly employed for nuclear and aerospace<br />

industries. This (WEDM) is one <strong>of</strong> the main applications <strong>of</strong><br />

the traditional electrical discharge machining (EDM). EDM<br />

machining was first discovered by the English scientist<br />

Joseph Priestly in 1770, but its advantages were utilized<br />

completely only in the year 1943 by the Russian scientists<br />

and it was commercially developed in the year 1970. In the<br />

mid <strong>of</strong> 1980s this technique was used in machine tools to<br />

machine electrically conducting materials. WEDM utilizes<br />

a continuously travelling wire electrode made <strong>of</strong> thin<br />

copper, brass or tungsten or coated wire <strong>of</strong> diameter 0.05 –<br />

0.3 mm [1]. A dielectric fluid is forced into the machining<br />

zone to improve the effectiveness as well as to carry away<br />

the debris so that it reduces the chances <strong>of</strong> short circuit<br />

between wire electrode and the work piece. Nowadays, in<br />

order to achieve better performance, the work piece and the<br />

tool are submerged in the dielectric fluid. Most commonly<br />

used dielectric fluids are kerosene and de ionized water [2].<br />

The data base to select the correct parameter setting for<br />

newly developed materials is not readily available. The<br />

machine manufacturers provide the information only for<br />

the commonly used materials. So the databases provided by<br />

the manufacturers are not enough to meet the present needs<br />

<strong>of</strong> modern industries [3].<br />

This study aims to examine the influence <strong>of</strong> four<br />

important parameters viz. ‗pulse on time‘, ‗pulse <strong>of</strong>f time‘,<br />

‗voltage‘ and ‗dielectric pressure‘ on surface roughness in


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering<br />

Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2012)<br />

WEDM <strong>of</strong> Ti-6Al-4V. The various parameters were<br />

selected using design <strong>of</strong> experiments method.<br />

II. LITERATURE REVIEW<br />

There are a number <strong>of</strong> published works that reveal the<br />

influence <strong>of</strong> WEDM parameters on the surface roughness<br />

<strong>of</strong> different materials. Y.S. Liao found that surface<br />

roughness is most affected by the pulse on time [5]. The<br />

WEDM parameters are generally classified into two groups<br />

namely electrical and non electrical. [6]. S.S. Mahapatra<br />

and Amar Patnaik have investigated the effect <strong>of</strong> various<br />

parameters and found that current, pulse duration and<br />

dielectric pressure play most significant role in surface<br />

finish [7]. U.Esme et.al observed that increase in pulse<br />

duration, voltage and wire speed increase the surface<br />

roughness whereas increase in flushing pressure <strong>of</strong><br />

dielectric fluid decrease the surface roughness [8]. The<br />

investigations made by J.T Hung et.al revealed that pulse<br />

on time is one <strong>of</strong> the significant factors that influence<br />

surface roughness [9]. The previous researchers established<br />

that pulse duration, voltage, and dielectric pressure are the<br />

desired combination to control the surface finish [1].<br />

Ramakrishnan et al. described the multi objective<br />

optimization <strong>of</strong> the WEDM process using parametric<br />

design <strong>of</strong> Taguchi methodology [11]. Fuzhu Han et.al<br />

found that surface roughness can be improved by<br />

decreasing both pulse duration and discharge current [10].<br />

Although lot <strong>of</strong> investigations were done on the influence<br />

<strong>of</strong> various WEDM parameters on surface roughness, till<br />

date no investigation was conducted on the influence <strong>of</strong><br />

pulse on time, pulse <strong>of</strong>f time, voltage and dielectric<br />

pressure on WEDM <strong>of</strong> Ti-6Al-4V using DOE. This<br />

experimental study reveals the influence <strong>of</strong> pulse on time,<br />

pulse <strong>of</strong>f time, voltage and dielectric pressure and its<br />

interactions on the surface roughness in WEDM <strong>of</strong> Ti-6Al-<br />

4V alloy.<br />

FIGURE .1 DETAILS OF WEDM SETUP.<br />

378<br />

III. EXPERIMENTAL SET UP<br />

The experimental set up adopted for present study is<br />

given in figure 2. The WEDM experiments were conducted<br />

in Electronica ultra cut s1 machine using 0.25 mm brass<br />

wire as the tool electrode. ‗Pulse on time‘, ‗pulse <strong>of</strong>f time‘,<br />

‗voltage‘ and ‗dielectric pressure‘ are the four WEDM<br />

parameters that were selected for investigations. In this<br />

experimental study two level full factorial experiment is<br />

adopted because this gives all possible combinations <strong>of</strong><br />

machine parameters. All other machine parameters were<br />

kept constant during the time <strong>of</strong> experiment.<br />

IV. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN BASED ON DOE<br />

A full factorial design with all factors at two levels<br />

provides the estimation <strong>of</strong> all the required parameter<br />

combinations. Altogether sixteen experiments and two<br />

conformation tests were conducted. For the analysis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

experiments 10% confidence level is used.<br />

FIGURE.2 ELECTRONICA ULTRACUT S1 WEDM 5-AXES<br />

ANNOVA table helped to find out the significant factors<br />

and to establish the mathematical relationship between the<br />

surface roughness and machining parameters.<br />

TABLE I<br />

MACHINING PARAMETERS AND LEVELS<br />

Factor Parameters Level 1 Level 2<br />

A Pulse on time (μS) 20 25<br />

B Pluse <strong>of</strong>f time (μS) 44 50<br />

C Voltage (V) 25 30<br />

D<br />

Dielectric pressure<br />

(kgf/cm 2 )<br />

10 15


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering<br />

Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2012)<br />

V. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS<br />

This section discusses the influence <strong>of</strong> the process<br />

parameters on the surface roughness. The main objective <strong>of</strong><br />

this discussion is to assess the variation <strong>of</strong> surface<br />

roughness with respect to the change in the process<br />

parameters. The various machining parameters in two<br />

levels and corresponding results <strong>of</strong> surface roughness<br />

(average <strong>of</strong> three readings) are tabulated in Table 2.<br />

No<br />

TABLE II<br />

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN AND RESULTS<br />

Voltage<br />

(V)<br />

Dielectric<br />

pressure<br />

(kgf/cm 2 )<br />

Pulse<br />

on<br />

time<br />

(μS)<br />

Pulse<br />

<strong>of</strong>f<br />

time<br />

(μS)<br />

Ra<br />

(μm)<br />

1 25 10 20 44 3.534<br />

2 30 10 20 44 3.544<br />

3 25 15 20 44 3.331<br />

4 30 15 20 44 3.348<br />

5 25 10 25 44 4.227<br />

6 30 10 25 44 4.285<br />

7 25 15 25 44 3.628<br />

8 30 15 25 44 4.009<br />

9 25 10 20 50 3.635<br />

10 30 10 20 50 3.447<br />

11 25 15 20 50 3.624<br />

12 30 15 20 50 3.364<br />

13 25 10 25 50 3.907<br />

14 30 10 25 50 4.023<br />

15 25 15 25 50 3.384<br />

16 30 15 25 50 4.283<br />

17 28 13 23 47 3.821<br />

18 26 11 21 45 3.388<br />

379<br />

The ANNOVA table <strong>of</strong> surface roughness (Ra) showed<br />

that two individual factors and one interaction affect the<br />

surface roughness. The probability values (Prob>F) are less<br />

than 0.05 for pulse on time, dielectric pressure(WP) and the<br />

interaction between the voltage and pulse on time. The<br />

most important factor which affects the surface roughness<br />

is pulse on time. The relation between the various<br />

parameters and surface roughness are given in the main<br />

effect plot viz. figure (3a), figure (3b) and figure (3c).<br />

FIGURE 3A<br />

FIGURE 3B<br />

FIGURE 3C<br />

FIGURE. 3 INTERACTIONS OF VARIOUS FACTORS WITH<br />

SURFACE ROUGHNESS


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering<br />

Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2012)<br />

It is evident from figure (3a) that the surface roughness<br />

decreases with increase in dielectric pressure, whereas<br />

figure (3b) reveals that the surface roughness increases<br />

with increase in pulse on time. Figure (3c) gives the<br />

variation <strong>of</strong> surface roughness with voltage corresponding<br />

to minimum and maximum values <strong>of</strong> pulse on time. It can<br />

be noticed from the figure that corresponding to minimum<br />

value <strong>of</strong> pulse on time the surface roughness decreases with<br />

increase in voltage, whereas the surface roughness<br />

increases with increase in voltage corresponding to<br />

maximum value <strong>of</strong> pulse on time.<br />

When the pulse on time is maximum and the voltage<br />

increase from 25 v to 30 v, the surface roughness also<br />

increases. To achieve minimum surface roughness (Ra), the<br />

pulse on time, voltage and dielectric pressure should be set<br />

at 20 µs, 30 V and 15 kgf/cm 2 respectively. The effect <strong>of</strong><br />

these factors on surface roughness is evident from the ‗3 D<br />

interaction graph‘ depicted in fig. (4). A contour plot <strong>of</strong><br />

surface roughness connecting pulse on time and voltage is<br />

given in fig. (5). On the basis <strong>of</strong> the experimental<br />

investigations, an empirical relationship for surface<br />

roughness connecting voltage, dielectric pressure and pulse<br />

on time is established, which is given below<br />

FIGURE.4 SURFACE PLOT FOR SURFACE ROUGHNESS.<br />

FIGURE.5 CONTOUR PLOT FOR SURFACE ROUGHNESS.<br />

380<br />

Ra = - 21.54350 + (0.79120 X Voltage) + (2.71630 X<br />

dielectric pressure) + (1.27310 X pulse on time) -<br />

(0.094980 X Voltage X dielectric pressure) – (0.039800 X<br />

Voltage X pulse on time) -(0.13526 X dielectric pressure<br />

X pulse on time) + (4.68400E-003 X Voltage X dielectric<br />

pressure X pulse on time)<br />

VI. COMPARISON OF CONFORMATION TEST<br />

RESULTS WITH PREDICTED VALUES.<br />

Two conformation runs were conducted in order to<br />

measure the reliability <strong>of</strong> optimization solutions obtained<br />

from the analysis.The comparison <strong>of</strong> test results between<br />

the therotical prediction and conformation test results were<br />

the final consideration that will determine whether the<br />

optimum parameters predicted are within the allowable<br />

range. The margin <strong>of</strong> error from prediction and<br />

experimental results was obtained below 7%. Table 3<br />

shows the comparison <strong>of</strong> the test results with the predicted<br />

values.<br />

TABLE IIIIV<br />

COMPARISON OF THE TEST RESULTS WITH THE THEROTICAL<br />

PREDICTION.<br />

No. <strong>of</strong><br />

conformation<br />

Runs<br />

Predicted<br />

values using<br />

the<br />

mathematical<br />

model<br />

Conformation<br />

test results<br />

% <strong>of</strong><br />

Error<br />

1 3.77109 3.821 1.32<br />

2 3.63406 3.388 6.76<br />

VII. CONCLUSION<br />

In this study, the machining <strong>of</strong> Ti-6Al-4V alloy‘s<br />

performance in wire electrical discharge machining is<br />

explored by using two level full factorial experiment.<br />

Design expert was adopted in this study to determine the<br />

optimum condition <strong>of</strong> machining parameters and the<br />

significance <strong>of</strong> each parameter on the performance <strong>of</strong><br />

machining charectristics.


International Journal <strong>of</strong> Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering<br />

Website: www.ijetae.com (ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 2, Issue 4, April 2012)<br />

The following conclusions are drawn based on the<br />

investigations.<br />

1. The pulse on time , dielectric pressure, the interaction <strong>of</strong><br />

voltage and pulse on time are significant parameters which<br />

affect the surface roughness.<br />

2. Minimum surface roughness can be obtained by adopting<br />

a low value <strong>of</strong> pulse on time (20 µs) and a high value <strong>of</strong><br />

dielectric pressure (15 kgf/cm 2 ).<br />

3. Improper setting <strong>of</strong> pulse on time and pulse <strong>of</strong>f time can<br />

lead to wire breakage which in turn lead to increase in<br />

machining time.<br />

4. A mathematical model is established to predict the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> surface roughness.<br />

5. The marginal error obtained by the comparision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

predicted results with the conformation test was less than<br />

7%.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] K.H. Ho, S.T. Newman, S. Rahimifard, R.D. Allen, ―State<br />

<strong>of</strong> the art in wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM)‖<br />

International Journal <strong>of</strong> Machine Tools & Manufacture 44<br />

(2004) 1247–1259.<br />

[2] Manufacuring science second edition by Amitabha Ghosh<br />

and Asok Kumar Mallik, Second Edition.<br />

[3] Scott F. Miller, Chen-C. Kao, Albert J. Shih, Jun Qu,<br />

―Investigation <strong>of</strong> wire electrical discharge machining <strong>of</strong> thin<br />

cross-sections and compliant mechanisms‖, International<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Machine Tools & Manufacture 45 (2005) 1717–<br />

1725.<br />

381<br />

[4] Fuzhu Han, Jun Jiang, Dingwen Yu, ―Influence <strong>of</strong> discharge<br />

current on machined surfaces by thermo-analysis in finish<br />

cut <strong>of</strong> WEDM‖, International Journal <strong>of</strong> Machine Tools &<br />

Manufacture 47 (2007) 1187–1196.<br />

[5] Y.S. Liao, J.T. Huang, Y.H. Chen, ―A study to achieve a<br />

fine surface finish in wire-EDM‖, Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials<br />

Processing Technology 149 (2004) 165–171.<br />

[6] Y.S. Liao, J.T. Huang, Y.H. Chen, ―A study to achieve a<br />

fine surface finish in <strong>Wire</strong>-EDM‖, Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials<br />

Processing Technology 149 (2004) 165–171.<br />

[7] Yan, B. H., Wang, C. C., Liu, W. D. and Huang F. Y.<br />

(2002). ―<strong>Machining</strong> Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Al2O3 / 6061 Al<br />

Composite Using Rotary EDM with a Dislike Electrode.‖<br />

The International Journal <strong>of</strong> Advances Manufacturing<br />

Technology, 16: pp. 322-333.<br />

[8] S. S.Mahapatra, Amar Patnaik, ―Parametric Optimization <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Wire</strong> <strong>Electrical</strong> <strong>Discharge</strong> <strong>Machining</strong> (WEDM) Process<br />

using Taguchi Method‖, / Vol. XXVIII, No. 4, October-422<br />

December 2006.<br />

[9] U.Ese,Sagbas,F Kahraman, ―Prediction <strong>of</strong> Surface<br />

Roughness in <strong>Wire</strong> <strong>Electrical</strong> <strong>Discharge</strong> machining using<br />

design <strong>of</strong> Experiments and Neural Networks‖, Iranian<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Science & Technology, Transaction B,<br />

Engineering, Vol. 33, No. B3, pp 231-240<br />

[10] J.T. Huang, Y.S. Liao, W.J. Hsue, ―Determination <strong>of</strong> finishcutting<br />

operation number and machining-parameters setting<br />

in wire electrical discharge machining‖, Journal <strong>of</strong> Materials<br />

Processing Technology 87 (1999) 69–81.<br />

[11] Fuzhu Han & Jun Jiang & Dingwen Yu, ―Influence <strong>of</strong><br />

machining parameters on surface roughness in finish cut <strong>of</strong><br />

WEDM‖, Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2007) 34:538–546<br />

[12] R. Ramakrishnan · L. Karunamoorthy, ―Multi response<br />

optimization <strong>of</strong> wire EDM operations using robust design <strong>of</strong><br />

experiments‖, Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2006) 29: 105–112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!