Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park
Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park
Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>April</strong> 8, <strong>2002</strong><br />
Page 12<br />
Mrs. Karr relayed that the applicant is requesting a rezoning from R-1, Single-Family<br />
Residential to R-1A, Small-Lot, Single-Family Residential District, to allow additional<br />
residential development. She said the applicant intends to develop two single-family<br />
homes on the existing lot.<br />
The applicant’s lot is 100 feet wide by 145 feet deep, and the R-1A district allows a<br />
minimum lot width <strong>of</strong> 50 feet with an average lot depth <strong>of</strong> 100 feet. Mrs. Karr said the<br />
R-1 District requires a minimum lot width <strong>of</strong> 70 feet and an average lot depth <strong>of</strong> 115<br />
feet. The applicant has indicated that they intend to split the lot lengthways for two<br />
development parcels.<br />
Mrs. Karr advised that the Future Development Plan identified this property for<br />
medium-density residential uses. The Master Plan also identifies R-1A zoning as an<br />
appropriate designation in that medium-density residential category; therefore, the<br />
applicant’s request is in conformance with the Master Plan.<br />
Staff Comments relayed that the application area was part <strong>of</strong> a study area in 1994. At<br />
that time, the <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> and the <strong>City</strong> Council affirmed the mediumdensity<br />
designation. Mrs. Karr said in addition, there were criteria from the Master<br />
Plan identified as an important consideration for any development within the study<br />
area. She said that policy is outlined in Staff Comments and relates to compatibility<br />
with infill development. The study area also recommended requiring that all mediumdensity<br />
residential development comply with principles related to being in scale with<br />
the neighborhood, similar building orientations and compatible architectural design.<br />
After reviewing the applicant’s request, Mrs. Karr said staff recommends approval <strong>of</strong><br />
this rezoning request with stipulation a shown in Staff Comments.<br />
Mr. Sanders noted that the application has an address on 87th Street, and the new<br />
houses, if approved, will be on Melrose. He asked if the address would be changed to<br />
show a Melrose address. Mrs. Karr believed that was correct.<br />
Mr. Mitch Ashlock, 100 East <strong>Park</strong> Street, Olathe, Kansas, explained that the address<br />
used on the application was taken <strong>of</strong>f a former house that used to be here years ago.<br />
He agreed that it should be changed to Melrose, and agreed with stipulation a.<br />
Chairman Hunter opened the public hearing, but with no one wanting to comment on<br />
this item, the public hearing was closed.<br />
Mrs. Conrad stated that this is a wonderful infill project. She was delighted to see the<br />
applicant build two patio-type homes in this location.<br />
Mrs. Conrad then moved that the <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> recommend to the <strong>City</strong><br />
Council approval <strong>of</strong> Rezoning No. <strong>2002</strong>-6 at 10424 West 87th Street, with stipulation<br />
a. After a second by Mr. Sanders, the motion carried by a 9 to 0 vote.<br />
REZONING NO. <strong>2002</strong>-7 – 8800 West 95th Street. Rezoning requested from C-2,<br />
General Business District to CP-2, Planned General Business District, to allow for<br />
commercial development. Application made by Klover Architects, Inc.<br />
(Approved)