Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park
Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park
Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>April</strong> 8, <strong>2002</strong><br />
Page 8<br />
Treasurer. He supported the proposed changes to the text for all the reasons stated by<br />
Mr. Hrabe. As a business owner, Mr. Grohmann said one <strong>of</strong> the selling points he uses<br />
to get new tenants into his buildings is that there are restaurants and retail within<br />
walking distance.<br />
Mr. Mark Hillman, 7923 Santa Fe, said he owned a business, with his partner, behind<br />
Mildred’s C<strong>of</strong>fee Shop, and they owned the buildings that front Santa Fe at 8025<br />
Santa Fe that includes the thrift shop, the barber shop, the cleaners that moved out<br />
and the vacant lot next to it. With regard to the empty cleaners tenant space,<br />
Mr. Hillman said there have been approximately 20 to 30 people inquire about renting<br />
that space, noting that about half <strong>of</strong> them was for <strong>of</strong>fice use. His concern about<br />
putting a retail user there is that there is no parking area, and he asked if staff could<br />
respond. Mr. Bear stated that if there is limited parking availability for a retail use,<br />
the same would be true for an <strong>of</strong>fice use. He said the <strong>City</strong> is going through a different<br />
procedure, separate from this, to look at some changes to Santa Fe Drive. He stressed<br />
that this Main Street 1 District is intended for properties that front along Santa Fe and<br />
front on 80th Street.<br />
Mr. Bob Meyers, said he had a retail business at 7947 Santa Fe, noting that he was a<br />
building owner with five store fronts on Santa Fe, from the clock tower south to the<br />
corner, which is his bookstore. He said this is the photography studio, with an <strong>of</strong>fice,<br />
ands he used to have The Floor Store. He said he has a wonderful retail tenant coming<br />
in that will be an asset to this area. Mr. Meyers said he could stay with <strong>of</strong>fice now<br />
and be grandfathered in; however, in the spirit <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>’s intent, he chose the best<br />
tenant which is retail.<br />
Mr. Meyers said he was asked to read a letter from Camp David, David Wilson, who is<br />
a resident <strong>of</strong> <strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and the owner <strong>of</strong> Branded Emblem and Camp David<br />
which have been located in downtown <strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> since 1969. The letter relayed<br />
that Mr. Wilson owned D&H Properties and Wilson Properties, both <strong>of</strong> which include:<br />
7920, 7912, 7908 and 7900 Foster; 7909, 7911, 7913, 7915 and 7917 Santa Fe;<br />
7327, 7331, 7333 and 7335 West 80th Street for an approximate total <strong>of</strong> 58,000<br />
square feet. The letter relayed Mr. Wilson’s opposition to the restriction that is being<br />
proposed on property owners. Mr. Wilson is on the Downtown <strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Partnership<br />
Board and his letter relayed that he did not feel this is the proper measure to take<br />
to ensure the success <strong>of</strong> this area. He did not feel that storeowners had the same<br />
investment as property owners because they can relocate their business, sometimes<br />
for a nominal amount. While many businesses have come and gone in the last ten<br />
years on Santa Fe and 80th Street, Mr. Wilson’s letter relayed that all <strong>of</strong> the buildings<br />
are still standing with many <strong>of</strong> them improved. The letter continued that Mr. Wilson<br />
believed these restrictions would be unfair to property owners because it restricts their<br />
ability to lease to potentially outstanding tenants that might have the same or greater<br />
draw for pedestrians as a retailer. He indicated that restricting him to whom he can<br />
sell his buildings to in the future would decrease his property value, which would<br />
discourage him from putting any more investment into his properties. The letter<br />
continued that Mr. Wilson appreciated the Farmer Market because it has created a<br />
wonderful draw for people and in turn, the properties and tenant mix has been<br />
improving. Instead <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> restricting property owners and trying to bring about<br />
change in this manner, Mr. Wilson relayed in his letter that the <strong>City</strong> should consider<br />
improving the infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the downtown which would provide more draw. He<br />
relayed that if property owners see that the <strong>City</strong> is committed to improving the<br />
downtown, they would follow suit and improve their tenant mix and physical