01.06.2013 Views

Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park

Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park

Planning Commission Meeting (April 8, 2002) - City of Overland Park

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> <strong>Planning</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>April</strong> 8, <strong>2002</strong><br />

Page 8<br />

Treasurer. He supported the proposed changes to the text for all the reasons stated by<br />

Mr. Hrabe. As a business owner, Mr. Grohmann said one <strong>of</strong> the selling points he uses<br />

to get new tenants into his buildings is that there are restaurants and retail within<br />

walking distance.<br />

Mr. Mark Hillman, 7923 Santa Fe, said he owned a business, with his partner, behind<br />

Mildred’s C<strong>of</strong>fee Shop, and they owned the buildings that front Santa Fe at 8025<br />

Santa Fe that includes the thrift shop, the barber shop, the cleaners that moved out<br />

and the vacant lot next to it. With regard to the empty cleaners tenant space,<br />

Mr. Hillman said there have been approximately 20 to 30 people inquire about renting<br />

that space, noting that about half <strong>of</strong> them was for <strong>of</strong>fice use. His concern about<br />

putting a retail user there is that there is no parking area, and he asked if staff could<br />

respond. Mr. Bear stated that if there is limited parking availability for a retail use,<br />

the same would be true for an <strong>of</strong>fice use. He said the <strong>City</strong> is going through a different<br />

procedure, separate from this, to look at some changes to Santa Fe Drive. He stressed<br />

that this Main Street 1 District is intended for properties that front along Santa Fe and<br />

front on 80th Street.<br />

Mr. Bob Meyers, said he had a retail business at 7947 Santa Fe, noting that he was a<br />

building owner with five store fronts on Santa Fe, from the clock tower south to the<br />

corner, which is his bookstore. He said this is the photography studio, with an <strong>of</strong>fice,<br />

ands he used to have The Floor Store. He said he has a wonderful retail tenant coming<br />

in that will be an asset to this area. Mr. Meyers said he could stay with <strong>of</strong>fice now<br />

and be grandfathered in; however, in the spirit <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong>’s intent, he chose the best<br />

tenant which is retail.<br />

Mr. Meyers said he was asked to read a letter from Camp David, David Wilson, who is<br />

a resident <strong>of</strong> <strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> and the owner <strong>of</strong> Branded Emblem and Camp David<br />

which have been located in downtown <strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> since 1969. The letter relayed<br />

that Mr. Wilson owned D&H Properties and Wilson Properties, both <strong>of</strong> which include:<br />

7920, 7912, 7908 and 7900 Foster; 7909, 7911, 7913, 7915 and 7917 Santa Fe;<br />

7327, 7331, 7333 and 7335 West 80th Street for an approximate total <strong>of</strong> 58,000<br />

square feet. The letter relayed Mr. Wilson’s opposition to the restriction that is being<br />

proposed on property owners. Mr. Wilson is on the Downtown <strong>Overland</strong> <strong>Park</strong> Partnership<br />

Board and his letter relayed that he did not feel this is the proper measure to take<br />

to ensure the success <strong>of</strong> this area. He did not feel that storeowners had the same<br />

investment as property owners because they can relocate their business, sometimes<br />

for a nominal amount. While many businesses have come and gone in the last ten<br />

years on Santa Fe and 80th Street, Mr. Wilson’s letter relayed that all <strong>of</strong> the buildings<br />

are still standing with many <strong>of</strong> them improved. The letter continued that Mr. Wilson<br />

believed these restrictions would be unfair to property owners because it restricts their<br />

ability to lease to potentially outstanding tenants that might have the same or greater<br />

draw for pedestrians as a retailer. He indicated that restricting him to whom he can<br />

sell his buildings to in the future would decrease his property value, which would<br />

discourage him from putting any more investment into his properties. The letter<br />

continued that Mr. Wilson appreciated the Farmer Market because it has created a<br />

wonderful draw for people and in turn, the properties and tenant mix has been<br />

improving. Instead <strong>of</strong> the <strong>City</strong> restricting property owners and trying to bring about<br />

change in this manner, Mr. Wilson relayed in his letter that the <strong>City</strong> should consider<br />

improving the infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the downtown which would provide more draw. He<br />

relayed that if property owners see that the <strong>City</strong> is committed to improving the<br />

downtown, they would follow suit and improve their tenant mix and physical

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!