Ph. D Thesis - Higher Education Commission
Ph. D Thesis - Higher Education Commission
Ph. D Thesis - Higher Education Commission
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Ph</strong>. D <strong>Thesis</strong><br />
QUANTIFICATION OF ASPIRIN, BRUFEN, DICLOFEN<br />
AND PARACETAMOL IN HUMAN BODY FLUIDS BY<br />
VARIOUS ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES<br />
A THESIS SUBMITTED TOWARDS THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF<br />
THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY<br />
IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY<br />
ABDUL RAUF KHASKHELI<br />
National Centre of Excellence in Analytical Chemistry,<br />
University of Sindh, Jamshoro - PAKISTAN<br />
2011
DEDICATED<br />
To My Affectionate Supervisors, Beloved Parents and Friends<br />
who’s Prayers, Encouragement and Cooperation Enabled Me for<br />
this Achievement<br />
i
Certificate<br />
This is to certify that Mr. ABDUL RAUF KHASKHELI has carried out his research<br />
work on the topic “QUANTIFICATION OF ASPIRIN, BRUFEN, DICLOFEN AND<br />
PARACETAMOL IN HUMAN BODY FLUIDS BY VARIOUS ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES”<br />
under our supervision at the laboratories of National Centre of Excellence in Analytical<br />
chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan and UNESCO laboratory of<br />
Environmental Electrochemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Charles<br />
University, Prague, Czech Republic under the abroad <strong>Ph</strong>.D split program (IRSIP) of<br />
<strong>Higher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Commission</strong>, Pakistan. The work reported in this thesis is original and<br />
distinct. His dissertation is worthy of presentation to the University of Sindh for the award<br />
of degree of Doctor of <strong>Ph</strong>ilosophy in Analytical Chemistry.<br />
Dr. Sirajuddin<br />
Associate Professor<br />
Supervisor<br />
National Centre of Excellence in Analytical<br />
Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan<br />
Dr. Syed Tufail Hussain Sherazi<br />
Associate Professor<br />
Co-Supervisor<br />
National Centre of Excellence in Analytical<br />
Chemistry, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan<br />
ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />
All praises be to Almighty Allah (The Most Merciful, The Most Gracious and The Most<br />
Compassionate) Who is the entire and only source of every knowledge, Who guides me in<br />
the obscurity and helps me in difficulties, and His Prophet Hazrat Mohammad Mustafa<br />
(Salallah-o-Alaihe Wasallim) whose teachings provide the spirit of learning the hidden and<br />
unconcealed facts of nature.<br />
I am highly grateful to my supervisor Dr. Sirajuddin (Associate Professor) and Cosupervisor<br />
Dr. Syed Tufail Hussain Sherazi (Associate Professor) for their genius and<br />
superb ideas, support and untiring efforts for my appreciation during my studies that enabled<br />
me to complete my research work successfully and truly made my research very fruitful and<br />
of high quality.<br />
I would like to extend my gratitude to Prof. Dr. Muhammad Iqbal Bhanger Director,<br />
NCEAC University of Sindh Jamshoro, Pakistan for his sincere advices and facilities to<br />
carry out this research work successfully.<br />
I am particularly indebted to my teachers, Prof. Dr. Tasneem Gul Kazi, Dr. Shahabuddin<br />
Memon, Dr. Najma Memon, Dr. Amber Rehana Solangi, Dr. Farah Naz Talpur, Dr.<br />
Aamna Baloch, Dr. Hassan Imran Afridi and Engr. Mairaj Ahmed Noorani who always<br />
offered their professional skills whenever needed. I am grateful for their encouraging<br />
attitude in the solution of problems faced during the course of my research work.<br />
I am extremely grateful to Prof. Dr. Jiri Barek and Dr. Jan Fischer for their kind<br />
supervision, excellent research assistance in completing a part of my <strong>Ph</strong>.D research work<br />
and in up grading my electrochemical approach during the course of my study in Czech<br />
Republic, at the UNESCO Laboratory of Environmental Electrochemistry, Department<br />
of Analytical Chemistry, Charles University Prague, under IRSIP by the HEC, Pakistan.<br />
I am also very much grateful to <strong>Higher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Commission</strong> of Pakistan, for awarding<br />
me the six months scholarship for research training in Czech Republic.<br />
I would extend my sincere and heartily thanks and appreciation to my friends, fellows and<br />
colleagues Dr. Sarfaraz Ahmed Mahesar, Dr. Afzal Shah, Dr. Abdul Niaz, Dr.<br />
Munawar Saeed Qureshi, Sajidullah Abbasi, Kamran Ahmed Abro, Dr. Ghulam<br />
Abbass Kandhro, Ateeq-ur-Rehman Memon, Nazar Hussain Kalwar,<br />
iii
M. Younis Talpur, Imam Bakhsh Solangi, Jameel Ahmed Baig, Zulfiqar Ali Tagar,<br />
Aijaz Ahmed Bhutto, Yawar Latif and Muhammad Ali.<br />
They always encouraged and cooperated with me and made every possible effort to provide<br />
the useful contribution for the improvement of this study.<br />
I would like to place on record sincere thanks to my teachers as my parents especially, Mr.<br />
Abdul Razaque Abro, Prof. Dr. M. Usman Memon, Prof. Dr. Ubedullah M. Abbasi,<br />
Prof. Dr. Mehboob Ali Rind, Mr. Abdul Hakeem Memon and Mr. Ubed-ur- Rehman<br />
Mughal and Mr. Imran-ul-Haq for their assistance and constructive attitude. I am highly<br />
thankful to Dr. Aftab Ahmed Kandhro and Munawar Ali Soomro for their dear and<br />
useful thoughts, and support for editing and printing during this dissertation.<br />
It seems an obligation upon me to record the word of encouragement for my family and<br />
simple words of thankfulness would not cover the genuine affection, absolute support,<br />
remarkable encouragement and profound prayers of my father Muhammad Bakhsh<br />
Khaskheli, brother Abdul Salam Khaskheli and all family members. I am thankful to all of<br />
them, without their co-operation, it would have been impossible for me to devote so much of<br />
time to this study.<br />
I would also like to thank administrative and supportive staff at National Centre of<br />
Excellence in Analytical Chemistry Pir Ziauddin, Nasrullah Kalhoro, Akhtar Vighio, M.<br />
Mudasir Arain, Pir Siraj, Shafiq A. Bhutto, Jawad Ahmed and Junaid Talpur<br />
ABDUL RAUF KHASKHELI<br />
iv
ABSTRACT<br />
A very fast, economical and simple direct spectrophotometric method was investigated for<br />
Paracetamol (PC) determination in aqueous medium without using any reagent. The method<br />
is based on the photo activation of the analyte at 243 nm after dissolution in water. The<br />
change in structure of PC after addition of water was studied by comparing the<br />
corresponding FTIR spectra. Optimization studies were conducted by using a 5 µg ml -1<br />
standard solution of the analyte. Various parameters studied include, time for stability and<br />
measurement of spectra, effect of HCl, NaOH, CH3COOH and NH3 for change in<br />
absorbance and shift in spectra, interference by some analgesic drugs and some polar<br />
solvents and temperature effect. After optimization, Beer’s law was obeyed in the range of<br />
0.3–20 µg ml -1 PC solution with a correlation coefficient of 0.9999 and detection limit of 0.1<br />
µg ml -1 for 3/1 S/N ratio. The newly developed method was successfully applied for PC<br />
determination in some locally available tablets and urinary samples. The proposed method is<br />
very useful for quick analysis of various types of solid and liquid samples containing PC.<br />
Another spectrophotometric work describes a simple, sensitive, rapid and economical<br />
analytical procedure for direct spectrophotometric evaluation of Diclofenac Sodium (DS)<br />
using aqueous medium without using a chemical reagent. Parameters like time, temperature,<br />
acidic and basic conditions and interference by analgesic drugs was studied for a 5µg ml -1<br />
solution of DS at 276 nm. Under optimized parameters, a linear working range of 0.1–30 g<br />
ml -1 with regression coefficient of 0.9998 and lower detection limit of 0.01 g ml -1 was<br />
obtained. The method was applied for DS contents in tablets, serum and urine samples.<br />
v
A new method was developed for the determination of paracetamol by differential pulse<br />
voltammetry (DPV) at carbon film electrode (CFE). The experimental parameters, such as<br />
pH of Britton-Robinson buffer and potentials for regeneration of electrode surface were<br />
optimized. Under optimized conditions in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0 a linear<br />
calibration curve was obtained in the range 0.02–100 μmol L -1 . The limit of determination<br />
was 0.034 μmol L -1 which showed high sensitivity of developed method. The method was<br />
applied for the quantitative determination of Paracetamol in pharmaceutical formulations as<br />
well as urine samples.<br />
A rapid, reliable and economical analytical procedure for the estimation of ibuprofen in<br />
pharmaceutical formulations and human urine samples was developed using transmission<br />
Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy. For the determination of ibuprofen, a KBr<br />
window with 500 µm spacer was used to acquire the FT-IR spectra of standards,<br />
pharmaceuticals as well as urine samples. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) calibration model<br />
was developed based on carbonyl region (C=O) from 1807-1461 cm −1 in the range from 10-<br />
1000 ppm. The developed model was checked by cross-validation steps to diminish standard<br />
error of the models, such as root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC), root mean<br />
square error of cross validation (RMSECV) and root mean square error of prediction<br />
(RMSEP). The good coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was achieved 0.999 with minimum<br />
standard errors RMSEC, RMSECV and RMSEP 1.89, 1.956 and 1.38, respectively.<br />
The other method was based on indirect determination of acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin)<br />
utilizing differential pulse voltammetry at carbon film electrode as working electrode. The<br />
theory of indirect determination of ASA is based on the hydrolysis of aspirin in salicylic<br />
vi
acid (SA) for detection. Moreover, we optimized conditions such as pH of Britton-Robinson<br />
buffer, potentials for regeneration and activation of electrode surface, amplitude and scan<br />
rate. Under optimized conditions in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0 a linear calibration<br />
curve was obtained in the range 0.2 – 100 µmol L -1 . The limit of determination was 0.15<br />
µmol L -1 which showed high sensitivity of developed method. The method for indirect<br />
determination of ASA was thus developed for the quantification of pharmaceutical<br />
formulations as well in human urine model samples.<br />
vii
List of Contents<br />
Dedication i<br />
Certificate ii<br />
Acknowledgement iii<br />
Abstract v<br />
List of Contents viii<br />
List of Tables xii<br />
List of Figures xiv<br />
Abbreviations xviii<br />
Chapter - One INTRODUCTION<br />
1.1. Analgesics / NSAIDs -An overview 1<br />
1.1.1. Mechanism of Action (NSAIDs) 2<br />
1.2. Paracetamol 3<br />
1.2.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias 3<br />
1.2.2. Uses and Administration 4<br />
1.2.3. Adverse Effects 4<br />
1.2.4. Overdosage and its Treatment 5<br />
1.2.5. Precautions 5<br />
1.3. Aspirin 6<br />
1.3.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias 6<br />
1.3.2. Uses and Administration 7<br />
1.3.3. Adverse Effects 8<br />
1.3.4. Overdosage and its Treatment 9<br />
1.3.5. Precautions 9<br />
1.4. Diclofen 10<br />
1.4.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias 10<br />
1.4.2. Uses and Administration 10<br />
1.4.3. Adverse Effects 11<br />
1.4.4. Precautions 12<br />
1.5. Brufen 12<br />
1.5.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias 12<br />
1.5.2. Uses and Administration 12<br />
1.5.3. Adverse Effects 13<br />
1.5.4. Overdosage and its Treatment 14<br />
1 – 14<br />
viii<br />
viii
Chapter - Two<br />
LITERATURE REVIEW<br />
15 – 42<br />
2.1. Analytical Techniques for Assessment of NSAIDs 15<br />
2.2. Electrochemical Techniques 16<br />
2.3. Spectroscopic Methods 21<br />
2.4. Chromatographic Methods 25<br />
2.5. Other Techniques 27<br />
2.6. Quantification of Paracetamol in Biological Samples and<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>armaceuticals<br />
27<br />
2.7. Quantification of Aspirin in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and Biological<br />
Samples<br />
31<br />
2.8. Quantification of Diclofenac Sodium in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and<br />
Biological Samples<br />
35<br />
2.9. Quantification of Ibuprofen in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and<br />
Biological Samples<br />
39<br />
Chapter - Three EXPERIMENTAL 43 – 53<br />
3.1. Material and Methods for Paracetamol Using UV-Visible<br />
Spectrophotometry<br />
43<br />
3.1.1. Reagents and Chemicals 43<br />
3.1.2. Instruments and Apparatus 43<br />
3.1.3. Procedure for Determining PC 44<br />
3.1.4. Analysis of PC in Urine Samples 44<br />
45<br />
3.2. Material and Methods for Diclofenac Sodium Using UV-<br />
Visible Spectrophotometry<br />
3.2.1. Apparatus 45<br />
3.2.2. Washing of Glassware 45<br />
3.2.3. Reagents and Solutions 45<br />
3.2.4. Procedure for Determining DS in Tablets 46<br />
3.2.5. Procedure for DS in Serum and Urine Samples 46<br />
3.3. Material and Methods for the Determination of<br />
Paracetamol Using Differential Pulse Voltammetry<br />
47<br />
3.3.1. Reagents and Solutions 47<br />
3.3.2. Apparatus 47<br />
3.3.3. Procedures 48<br />
49<br />
3.4. Material and Methods for the Analysis of Ibuprofen<br />
Using FT-IR Spectroscopy<br />
3.4.1. Reagents and Samples 49<br />
3.4.2. FT-IR Spectral Measurements 49<br />
ix
3.4.3. FT-IR Calibrations 50<br />
3.4.4. Sample Preparation Procedure 50<br />
3.4.5. Collection and Preparation of Urine Samples 50<br />
3.5. Material and Methods for Investigation of Aspirin Using<br />
Voltammetry<br />
51<br />
3.5.1. Reagents 51<br />
3.5.2. Apparatus 51<br />
3.5.3. Voltammetric Procedure 52<br />
3.5.4. Indirect Determination of ASA 52<br />
3.5.5. Indirect Determination of ASA in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical<br />
Drugs and Urine Samples by DPV at CFE<br />
52<br />
Chapter - Four Result and Discussions 54 - 108<br />
4.1. Simpler Spectrophotometric Assay of PC in Tablets and<br />
Urine Samples<br />
54<br />
54<br />
4.1.1. Effect of Water Addition to PC (FTIR studies)<br />
4.1.2. Optimization of Time for Measurement and Stability<br />
of Analytical Signal<br />
55<br />
4.1.3. Effect of Temperature 56<br />
4.1.4. Effect of Polar Solvents 57<br />
4.1.5. Interference by Various Analgesic Drugs 58<br />
4.1.6. Effect of Acidic and Basic Solutions 60<br />
4.1.7. Calibration Range 61<br />
4.1.8. Analysis of Tablets 62<br />
4.1.9. Analysis of Urine Samples 63<br />
4.2. Simpler and Faster Spectrophotometric Determination of<br />
Diclofenac Sodium (DS) in Tablets, Serum and Urine<br />
Samples<br />
65<br />
4.2.1. Influence of Time 65<br />
4.2.2. Effect of Temperature 66<br />
4.2.3. Interference by Various Analgesic Drugs 67<br />
4.2.4. Effect of Acidic and Alkaline Conditions 68<br />
4.2.5. Calibration Plot 71<br />
4.2.6. Comparison with Other Reported Spectroscopic<br />
Methods<br />
71<br />
4.2.7. Analysis of Tablets 72<br />
4.2.8. Analysis of Urine and Serum Samples 74<br />
4.3. Differential Pulse Voltammetric Determination of PC in<br />
Tablet and Urine Samples at Carbon Film Electrode<br />
4.3.1. Influence of pH on PC at DC and DP Voltammetry 77<br />
77<br />
x
4.3.2. Optimization of Parameters and Calibration Curve 78<br />
4.3.3. Analysis of <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Drugs 82<br />
4.3.4. Analysis of Urine Samples 84<br />
4.4. Quantification of Ibuprofen in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceuticals and<br />
Biological Samples by FTIR Transmission Spectroscopy.<br />
4.4.1. Analysis of <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Samples<br />
86<br />
4.4.2. Analysis of Urine Samples 89<br />
4.4.3. Limits of Detection and Quantitation 92<br />
4.5. Differential Pulse Voltammetric Determination of<br />
Salicylic acid and Acetylsalicylic acid in Tablet and Urine<br />
Samples at Carbon Film Electrode<br />
93<br />
93<br />
4.5.1. Influence of pH on Salicylic Acid in DC and DP<br />
Voltammetry<br />
4.5.2. Reproducibility of Salicylic Acid 94<br />
4.5.3. Linear Calibration Curves of Salicylic Acid 95<br />
4.5.4. Hydrolysis of Acetylsalicylic acid 97<br />
4.5.5. Linear Calibration Curves of Hydrolyzed<br />
Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE<br />
98<br />
4.5.6. Determination of Salicylic Acid in Different Drugs 100<br />
4.5.7. Determination of Acetylsalicylic Acid from Different<br />
Drugs<br />
101<br />
4.5.8. Determination of Salicylic Acid in Urine Samples at<br />
CFE<br />
103<br />
4.5.9. Determination of Acetylsalicylic Acid in Urine at<br />
CFE<br />
104<br />
4.5.10. Interference Study 106<br />
4.6. Conclusion 107<br />
References 109-132<br />
86<br />
xi
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table. 4.1.1. Effect of different polar solvents on absorbance of PC.<br />
Table. 4.1.2. % interference by various analgesics in different ratios on<br />
5 µg ml -1 PC<br />
59<br />
Table. 4.1.3. Effect of strong and weak acids and bases on PC<br />
determination 60<br />
Table. 4.1.4. Determination of PC in tables of various companies by<br />
proposed method<br />
63<br />
Table. 4.1.5. Comparative analyses of PC in urine samples. 63<br />
Table. 4.2.1. % interference by various analgesics in different ratios on<br />
5 µg ml -1 DS<br />
67<br />
Table. 4.2.2. Effect of strong and weak acids and bases on DFS<br />
determination<br />
70<br />
Table. 4.2.3. Comparison of current method with other spectroscopic<br />
methods for determination of DS<br />
72<br />
Table. 4.2.4. Determination of DS in tablets of various companies by<br />
proposed method<br />
73<br />
Table. 4.2.5. Concentration of determined DS and its relation with<br />
ingested DS by oral administration<br />
76<br />
Table 4.3.1. The influence of pH on DCV and DPV of Paracetamol<br />
(c = 100 µmol L -1 )<br />
Table. 4.3.2. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
78<br />
determination of Paracetamol in Britton-Robinson buffer<br />
pH 4.0 using DPV at CFE with regeneration potential<br />
Ereg1 = –400 mV, and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Table. 4.3.3. The amount of Paracetamol determined by DPV in tablets<br />
79<br />
of commercial drugs with declare contents 500 mg of<br />
Paracetamol.<br />
Table. 4.3.4. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of model samples of Paracetamol in urine,<br />
83<br />
media of Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0 using DPV at<br />
CFE with regeneration potentials Ereg1 = –400 mV and<br />
Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
84<br />
Table. 4.4.1. Results for the ibuprofen concentration found in the tablet<br />
samples<br />
87<br />
Table. 4.4.2. Recovery result of ibuprofen from tablet samples after<br />
spiking with known concentrations of standards<br />
89<br />
Table. 4.4.3. Recovery results of ibuprofen from urine samples after<br />
spiking with known concentrations of standard<br />
90<br />
Table 4.4.4. Recovery results of ibuprofen in urine samples after<br />
spiking with known concentrations of standard<br />
91<br />
Table. 4.5.1. The influence of pH on DCV and DPV of Salicylic Acid (c<br />
= 100 µmol L -1 )<br />
94<br />
xii
Table 4.5.2. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of Salicylic Acid in a Britton-Robinson<br />
buffer pH 2.0 using DPV at CFE with activation potential<br />
2200 mV<br />
Table 4.5.3. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid in a<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0 using DPV at CFE with<br />
activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Table 4.5.4. The amount of Salicylic Acid determined by DPV in<br />
tablets<br />
Table 4.5.5. The amount of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid<br />
determined by DPV in tablets<br />
Table 4.5.6. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of salicylic acid in 0.1 ml urine samples in a<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0 using DPV at CFE with<br />
activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Table 4.5.7. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic acid in 0.1 ml<br />
urine sample in a Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0 using<br />
DPV at CFE with activation potential 2200 mV<br />
97<br />
100<br />
101<br />
102<br />
104<br />
106<br />
xiii
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure. 1.1. Structural formula of Paracetamol (PC) 3<br />
Figure. 1.2. Structural formula of Aspirin (ASA) 6<br />
Figure. 1.3. Structural formula of Diclofenac Sodium (DS) 10<br />
Figure. 1.4. Structural formula of Ibuprofen (IBP) 12<br />
Figure. 4.1.1. FTIR spectra of (A), pure PC (B), aqueous PC paste and<br />
(C) aqueous solution of 5 µgml -1 PC.<br />
55<br />
Figure. 4.1.2. Dependence of absorbance of PC on time 56<br />
Figure. 4.1.3. Effect of temperature on absorbance of PC 57<br />
Figure. 4.1.4. Shift of wavelength with pH: (A) 3.3 and (B) 12. 3 for<br />
5µgml -1 PC solution.<br />
61<br />
Figure. 4.1.5. Calibration range of absorbance vs. concentration for PC<br />
from 0.3 to 20 µg ml -1 .<br />
61<br />
Figure. 4.1.6. A 1000 times diluted sample of urine (a) with PC and (b)<br />
without PC.<br />
64<br />
Figure. 4.2.1. Time effect on absorbance of Diclofenac Sodium 65<br />
Figure. 4.2.2. Temperature effect on UV absorbance of 5 µg ml -1 DS<br />
solution.<br />
66<br />
Figure. 4.2.3. UV spectra of DS at acidic pH, 3.56 (lower) and basic pH,<br />
11.68 (higher).<br />
Figure. 4.2.4. Calibration plot of absorbance verses concentration for DS<br />
69<br />
solutions from below to above as 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,<br />
8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 µg ml -1 .<br />
71<br />
Figure. 4.2.5. Representative UV-spectrum of expected 5 µg ml -1 DS in<br />
(Diclofen) tablet.<br />
73<br />
Figure. 4.2.6. UV spectra showing blank (black), DS containing (blue)<br />
and DS spiked (red) urine.<br />
74<br />
Figure. 4.2.7. UV spectra showing blank (black), DS containing (blue)<br />
and DS spiked (red) serum.<br />
Figure. 4.3.1. DC voltammograms (A) and DP voltammograms (B) of<br />
Paracetamol (c = 100 μmol<br />
75<br />
-1 .l) at CFE in Britton-Robinson<br />
buffer pH 2 to 12 (numbers above curves correspond to<br />
given pH) without electrode regeneration. Inset is<br />
corresponding dependence of peak potential on the pH.<br />
Figure. 4.3.2. Repetitive measurements of 100 µmol L<br />
77<br />
-1 Paracetamol<br />
using DPV at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0 with<br />
regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300<br />
mV Inset is corresponding dependence of peak current on<br />
the number of scans.<br />
Figure. 4.3.3. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 20 (3)<br />
40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100 µmol L<br />
79<br />
-1 . Regeneration<br />
potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Background current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence.<br />
80<br />
xiv
Figure. 4.3.4. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 2 (3)<br />
4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Regeneration potential<br />
Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV. Background<br />
current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence.<br />
Figure. 4.3.2. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(Paracetamol): 0 (1),<br />
81<br />
0.2 (2), 0,4 (3), 0,6 (4), 0,8 (5), 1 µmol L -1 (6).<br />
Regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300<br />
mV. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
Figure. 4.3.6. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 0,02<br />
81<br />
(3) 0,04, (4) 0,06, (5) 0,08, (6) 0,1 µmol L -1 . Regeneration<br />
potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Background current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence.<br />
Figure. 4.3.3. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol 10 µmol<br />
82<br />
L -1 with Ascorbic acid from 10 to 100 µmol L -1<br />
(concentrations are written above curves in plot) at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, regeneration potential<br />
Ereg1 = –400 mV, and Ereg2 = 1300 mV. Inset is<br />
83<br />
corresponding dependence of peak current of<br />
Paracetamol on concentration of Ascorbic acid.<br />
Figure. 4.3.4. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine with<br />
model sample of Paracetamol (2 – 10 µmol L -1 (A), and<br />
20 – 100 µmol L -1 (B), concentration is written next to<br />
curves in plots) sample at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer<br />
pH 4.0, regeneration potentials Ereg1 = –400 mV, and Ereg2<br />
= 1300 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
84<br />
Figure. 4.4.1. Calibration plot in the range of 10-100 ppm for<br />
pharmaceutical samples<br />
87<br />
Figure. 4.4.2. <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Tablet sample and spikes of 30 ppm, 50<br />
ppm, 70 ppm ibuprofen<br />
88<br />
Figure. 4.4.3. Blank urine and 3 spikes of 10, 20, 30 ppm ibuprofen 90<br />
Figure. 4.4.5. Group Spectra of Ibuprofen Standards 92<br />
Figure. 4.5.1. A and B. DC & DP voltammograms of Salicylic Acid<br />
(c = 100 µmol L -1 ) at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH<br />
2 to 12 (numbers in above curves correspond to given pH).<br />
Inset is corresponding dependence of peak potential on the<br />
pH<br />
Figure. 4.5.2. Measurements of 100 µmol L -1 Salicylic Acid using DPV<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson Buffer pH 2.0 with activation<br />
potential (1) 2000,(2) 1500 and (3) 2200 mV<br />
93<br />
95<br />
xv
Figure. 4.5.3. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 8,0 (6) 100 µmol L -1 .<br />
Activation of potential=2200mV for 120 sec<br />
Inset is corresponding calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.4. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2) 2<br />
(3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Activation of<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.5. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
0.2 (3) 0.4, (4) 0.6, (5) 0.8, (6) 1 µmol L -1 . Activation of<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence<br />
Figure.4.5.6. Differential pulse voltammograms of 10 µmol L -1<br />
hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, (1) Electrolyte, (2) 10 µmol L -1<br />
without hydrolysis (3) 10 µmol L -1 Salicylic Acid (4) 10<br />
µmol L -1 after hydrolysis Acetylsalicylic acid. Activation<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec<br />
Figure. 4.5.7. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.8. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2. c (ASA): (1) 0, (2) 2<br />
(3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.9. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0, (2) 0.2 (3) 0.4, (4)<br />
0.6, (5) 0.8, (6) 1 µmol L -1 . Activation potential=2200mV for 120<br />
sec. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence<br />
Figure.4.5.10.Differential pulse voltammograms of 4 µmol L -1 Duofilm<br />
sample with spikes of salicylic acid standard at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) electrolyte, (2)<br />
expected 4 μmol L -1 salicylic acid in sample of Duofilm<br />
(3) 6 μmol L -1 spike, (4) 8 μmol L -1 spike and (5) 10 μmol<br />
L -1 spike. Activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Figure. 4.5.11. Differential pulse voltammograms of 4 µmol L -1 Aspirin<br />
sample with spikes of hydrolyzed acetylsalicylic acid<br />
standard at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA):<br />
(1) electrolyte, (2) expected 4 μmol L -1 salicylic acid in<br />
sample of Aspirin (3) 6 μmol L -1 spike, (4) 8 μmol L -1<br />
spike and (5) 10 μmol L -1 spike. Activation potential 2200<br />
mV<br />
96<br />
96<br />
97<br />
98<br />
99<br />
99<br />
100<br />
101<br />
102<br />
xvi
Figure. 4.5.12. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential 2200 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.13. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Activation potential<br />
2200 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.14. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0,<br />
(2) 20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential 2200 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.15. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0,<br />
(2) 2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential 2200 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence<br />
Figure.4.5.16.Differential pulse voltammograms of hydrolyzed<br />
acetylsalicylic acid 5 μmolL -1 with ascorbic acid 5-100<br />
µmol L -1 at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0.<br />
Activation potential 2200 mV<br />
103<br />
103<br />
105<br />
105<br />
106<br />
xvii
List of Abbreviations<br />
AdSV Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetry<br />
AgA–CFE Silver Amalgam Carbon Film Electrode<br />
AgA–PE Silver Amalgam Paste Electrode<br />
AgE Silver Electrode<br />
AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists<br />
ASA Acetylsalicylic Acid<br />
ATR Attenuated Total Reflection<br />
AuE Gold Electrode<br />
CFE Carbon Film Electrode<br />
CNS Central Nerves System<br />
COX Cyclo-Oxygenase<br />
CPE Carbon Paste Electrode<br />
CV Cyclic Voltammetry<br />
DDP Differential Pulse Polarography<br />
DME Dropping Mercury Electrode<br />
DPV Differential Pulse Voltammetry<br />
DS Diclofenac Sodium<br />
E1/2 Half Wave Potential<br />
FIA Flow Injection Analysis<br />
FT-IR Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy<br />
FT-NIR Fourier Transform Near-Infrared<br />
GC Gas Chromatography<br />
GC– MS Gas Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy<br />
GCE Glassy Carbon Electrode<br />
GGE Glassy Graphite Electrode<br />
HEC <strong>Higher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />
HMDE Hanging Mercury Drop Electrode<br />
HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography<br />
HT-GLC High-Temperature Gas–Liquid Chromatography<br />
Hz Hertz<br />
IBP Ibuprofen<br />
LOD Limit of Detection<br />
LOQ Limit of Quantification<br />
LSV Linear Sweep Voltammetry<br />
mg/kg Milligram per Kilogram<br />
mg/kg /b.w/day Milligram per Kilogram per Body Weight per Day<br />
mg/L Milligram per Liter<br />
mm Millimeter<br />
mol.L -1 Mole per liter<br />
mV Milli volt<br />
mV s -1 Milli volt per second<br />
nA Nano Ampere<br />
NIR Near-Infrared Spectroscopy<br />
nM Nano Molar<br />
NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance<br />
NPV Normal Pulse Voltammetry<br />
NSAIDs Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs<br />
PC Paracetamol<br />
xviii
PLS Partial Least Square<br />
ppb parts per billion<br />
ppm parts per million<br />
PtSE Platinum Solid Electrode<br />
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride<br />
RE Reference Electrode<br />
RMSEC Root Mean Standard Error of Calibration<br />
RMSEP Root Mean Square Error of Prediction<br />
RP-HPLC Reserved <strong>Ph</strong>ase-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography<br />
rpm revolutions per minute<br />
RSD Relative Standard Deviation<br />
SA Salicylic Acid<br />
SPME Solid <strong>Ph</strong>ase Microextraction<br />
SWV Square Wave Voltammetry<br />
TLC Thin Layer Chromatography<br />
TOF-MS Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry<br />
TQ Turbo Quant<br />
V/s Volt per second<br />
v/v Volume by volume<br />
WE Working Electrode<br />
WHO World Health Organization<br />
μg/kg Microgram per kilogram<br />
µg L -1 Microgram per liter<br />
µg/g Microgram per gram<br />
µL Micro liter<br />
µm Micrometer<br />
µM Micro mole<br />
µmol L -1 Micro mole per liter<br />
xix
List of Contents<br />
Dedication i<br />
Certificate ii<br />
Acknowledgement iii<br />
Abstract v<br />
List of Contents viii<br />
List of Tables xii<br />
List of Figures xiv<br />
Abbreviations xviii<br />
Chapter - One INTRODUCTION 1 - 14<br />
1.1. Analgesics / NSAIDs -An overview 1<br />
1.1.1. Mechanism of Action (NSAIDs) 2<br />
1.2. Paracetamol 3<br />
1.2.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias 3<br />
1.2.2. Uses and Administration 4<br />
1.2.3. Adverse Effects 4<br />
1.2.4. Overdosage and its Treatment 5<br />
1.2.5. Precautions 5<br />
1.3. Aspirin 6<br />
1.3.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias 6<br />
1.3.2. Uses and Administration 7<br />
1.3.3. Adverse Effects 8<br />
1.3.4. Overdosage and its Treatment 9<br />
1.3.5. Precautions 9<br />
1.4. Diclofen 10<br />
1.4.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias 10<br />
1.4.2. Uses and Administration 10<br />
1.4.3. Adverse Effects 11<br />
1.4.4. Precautions 12<br />
1.5. Brufen 12<br />
1.5.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias 12<br />
1.5.2. Uses and Administration 12<br />
1.5.3. Adverse Effects 13<br />
1.5.4. Overdosage and its Treatment 14
Chapter - Two LITERATURE REVIEW ix<br />
15 - 42<br />
2.1. Analytical Techniques for Assessment of NSAIDs 15<br />
2.2. Electrochemical Techniques 16<br />
2.3. Spectroscopic Methods 21<br />
2.4. Chromatographic Methods 25<br />
2.5. Other Techniques 27<br />
2.6. Quantification of Paracetamol in Biological Samples and<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>armaceuticals<br />
27<br />
2.7. Quantification of Aspirin in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and Biological<br />
Samples<br />
31<br />
2.8. Quantification of Diclofenac Sodium in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and<br />
Biological Samples<br />
35<br />
2.9. Quantification of Ibuprofen in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and<br />
Biological Samples<br />
39<br />
Chapter - Three EXPERIMENTAL 43 - 53<br />
3.1. Material and Methods for Paracetamol Using UV-Visible<br />
Spectrophotometry<br />
43<br />
3.1.1. Reagents and Chemicals 43<br />
3.1.2. Instruments and Apparatus 43<br />
3.1.3. Procedure for Determining PC 44<br />
3.1.4. Analysis of PC in Urine Samples 44<br />
3.2. Material and Methods for Diclofenac Sodium Using UV-<br />
Visible Spectrophotometry<br />
45<br />
3.2.1. Apparatus 45<br />
3.2.2. Washing of Glassware 45<br />
3.2.3. Reagents and Solutions 45<br />
3.2.4. Procedure for Determining DS in Tablets 46<br />
3.2.5. Procedure for DS in Serum and Urine Samples 46<br />
3.3. Material and Methods for the Determination of<br />
Paracetamol Using Differential Pulse Voltammetry<br />
47<br />
3.3.1. Reagents and Solutions 47<br />
3.3.2. Apparatus 47<br />
3.3.3. Procedures 48<br />
49<br />
3.4. Material and Methods for the Analysis of Ibuprofen<br />
Using FT-IR Spectroscopy<br />
3.4.1. Reagents and Samples 49
3.4.2. FT-IR Spectral Measurements 49<br />
3.4.3. FT-IR Calibrations 50<br />
3.4.4. Sample Preparation Procedure 50<br />
3.4.5. Collection and Preparation of Urine Samples 50<br />
3.5. Material and Methods for Investigation of Aspirin Using<br />
Voltammetry<br />
51<br />
3.5.1. Reagents 51<br />
3.5.2. Apparatus 51<br />
3.5.3. Voltammetric Procedure 52<br />
3.5.4. Indirect Determination of ASA 52<br />
3.5.5. Indirect Determination of ASA in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical<br />
Drugs and Urine Samples by DPV at CFE<br />
52<br />
Chapter - Four EXPERIMENTAL 54 - 108<br />
4.1. Simpler Spectrophotometric Assay of PC in Tablets and<br />
Urine Samples<br />
54<br />
4.1.1. Effect of Water Addition to PC (FTIR studies) 54<br />
4.1.2. Optimization of Time for Measurement and Stability<br />
of Analytical Signal<br />
55<br />
4.1.3. Effect of Temperature 56<br />
4.1.4. Effect of Polar Solvents 57<br />
4.1.5. Interference by Various Analgesic Drugs 58<br />
4.1.6. Effect of Acidic and Basic Solutions 60<br />
4.1.7. Calibration Range 61<br />
4.1.8. Analysis of Tablets 62<br />
4.1.9. Analysis of Urine Samples 63<br />
4.2. Simpler and Faster Spectrophotometric Determination of<br />
Diclofenac Sodium (DS) in Tablets, Serum and Urine<br />
Samples<br />
65<br />
4.2.1. Influence of Time 65<br />
4.2.2. Effect of Temperature 66<br />
4.2.3. Interference by Various Analgesic Drugs 67<br />
4.2.4. Effect of Acidic and Alkaline Conditions 68<br />
4.2.5. Calibration Plot 71<br />
4.2.6. Comparison with Other Reported Spectroscopic<br />
Methods<br />
71<br />
4.2.7. Analysis of Tablets 72<br />
4.2.8. Analysis of Urine and Serum Samples 74<br />
4.3. Differential Pulse Voltammetric Determination of PC in 77
4.3.1.<br />
Tablet and Urine Samples at Carbon Film Electrode<br />
Influence of pH on PC at DC and DP Voltammetry 77<br />
4.3.2. Optimization of Parameters and Calibration Curve 78<br />
4.3.3. Analysis of <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Drugs 82<br />
4.3.4. Analysis of Urine Samples 84<br />
4.4. Quantification of Ibuprofen in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceuticals and<br />
Biological Samples by FTIR Transmission Spectroscopy.<br />
86<br />
4.4.1. Analysis of <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Samples 86<br />
4.4.2. Analysis of Urine Samples 89<br />
4.4.3. Limits of Detection and Quantitation 92<br />
4.5. Differential Pulse Voltammetric Determination of<br />
Salicylic acid and Acetylsalicylic acid in Tablet and Urine<br />
Samples at Carbon Film Electrode<br />
93<br />
4.5.1. Influence of pH on Salicylic Acid in DC and DP<br />
Voltammetry<br />
93<br />
4.5.2. Reproducibility of Salicylic Acid 94<br />
4.5.3. Linear Calibration Curves of Salicylic Acid 95<br />
4.5.4. Hydrolysis of Acetylsalicylic acid 97<br />
4.5.5. Linear Calibration Curves of Hydrolyzed<br />
Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE<br />
98<br />
4.5.6. Determination of Salicylic Acid in Different Drugs 100<br />
4.5.7. Determination of Acetylsalicylic Acid from Different<br />
Drugs<br />
101<br />
4.5.8. Determination of Salicylic Acid in Urine Samples at<br />
CFE<br />
103<br />
4.5.9. Determination of Acetylsalicylic Acid in Urine at<br />
CFE<br />
104<br />
4.5.10. Interference Study 106<br />
4.6. Conclusion 107<br />
References 109-132
LIST OF TABLES<br />
Table. 4.1.1. Effect of different polar solvents on absorbance of PC. 58<br />
Table. 4.1.2. % interference by various analgesics in different ratios on<br />
5 µg ml -1 PC<br />
59<br />
Table. 4.1.3. Effect of strong and weak acids and bases on PC<br />
determination 60<br />
Table. 4.1.4. Determination of PC in tables of various companies by<br />
proposed method<br />
63<br />
Table. 4.1.5. Comparative analyses of PC in urine samples. 63<br />
Table. 4.2.1. % interference by various analgesics in different ratios on<br />
5 µg ml -1 DS<br />
67<br />
Table. 4.2.2. Effect of strong and weak acids and bases on DFS<br />
determination<br />
70<br />
Table. 4.2.3. Comparison of current method with other spectroscopic<br />
methods for determination of DS<br />
72<br />
Table. 4.2.4. Determination of DS in tablets of various companies by<br />
proposed method<br />
73<br />
Table. 4.2.5. Concentration of determined DS and its relation with<br />
ingested DS by oral administration<br />
76<br />
Table 4.3.1. The influence of pH on DCV and DPV of Paracetamol<br />
(c = 100 µmol L -1 )<br />
Table. 4.3.2. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
78<br />
determination of Paracetamol in Britton-Robinson buffer<br />
pH 4.0 using DPV at CFE with regeneration potential<br />
Ereg1 = –400 mV, and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Table. 4.3.3. The amount of Paracetamol determined by DPV in tablets<br />
79<br />
of commercial drugs with declare contents 500 mg of<br />
Paracetamol.<br />
Table. 4.3.4. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of model samples of Paracetamol in urine,<br />
83<br />
media of Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0 using DPV at<br />
CFE with regeneration potentials Ereg1 = –400 mV and<br />
Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
84<br />
Table. 4.4.1. Results for the ibuprofen concentration found in the tablet<br />
samples<br />
87<br />
Table. 4.4.2. Recovery result of ibuprofen from tablet samples after<br />
spiking with known concentrations of standards<br />
89<br />
Table. 4.4.3. Recovery results of ibuprofen from urine samples after<br />
spiking with known concentrations of standard<br />
90
Table 4.4.4. Recovery results of ibuprofen in urine samples after<br />
spiking with known concentrations of standard<br />
Table. 4.5.1. The influence of pH on DCV and DPV of Salicylic Acid (c<br />
= 100 µmol L -1 )<br />
Table 4.5.2. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of Salicylic Acid in a Britton-Robinson<br />
buffer pH 2.0 using DPV at CFE with activation potential<br />
2200 mV<br />
Table 4.5.3. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid in a<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0 using DPV at CFE with<br />
activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Table 4.5.4. The amount of Salicylic Acid determined by DPV in<br />
tablets<br />
Table 4.5.5. The amount of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid<br />
determined by DPV in tablets<br />
Table 4.5.6. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of salicylic acid in 0.1 ml urine samples in a<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0 using DPV at CFE with<br />
activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Table 4.5.7. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the<br />
determination of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic acid in 0.1 ml<br />
urine sample in a Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0 using<br />
DPV at CFE with activation potential 2200 mV<br />
91<br />
94<br />
97<br />
100<br />
101<br />
102<br />
104<br />
106
LIST OF FIGURES<br />
Figure. 1.1. Structural formula of Paracetamol (PC) 3<br />
Figure. 1.2. Structural formula of Aspirin (ASA) 6<br />
Figure. 1.3. Structural formula of Diclofenac Sodium (DS) 10<br />
Figure. 1.4. Structural formula of Ibuprofen (IBP) 12<br />
Figure. 4.1.1. FTIR spectra of (A), pure PC (B), aqueous PC paste and<br />
(C) aqueous solution of 5 µgml -1 PC.<br />
55<br />
Figure. 4.1.2. Dependence of absorbance of PC on time 56<br />
Figure. 4.1.3. Effect of temperature on absorbance of PC 57<br />
Figure. 4.1.4. Shift of wavelength with pH: (A) 3.3 and (B) 12. 3 for<br />
5µgml -1 PC solution.<br />
61<br />
Figure. 4.1.5. Calibration range of absorbance vs. concentration for PC<br />
from 0.3 to 20 µg ml -1 .<br />
61<br />
Figure. 4.1.6. A 1000 times diluted sample of urine (a) with PC and (b)<br />
without PC.<br />
64<br />
Figure. 4.2.1. Time effect on absorbance of Diclofenac Sodium 65<br />
Figure. 4.2.2. Temperature effect on UV absorbance of 5 µg ml -1 DS<br />
solution.<br />
66<br />
Figure. 4.2.3. UV spectra of DS at acidic pH, 3.56 (lower) and basic pH,<br />
11.68 (higher).<br />
Figure. 4.2.4. Calibration plot of absorbance verses concentration for DS<br />
69<br />
solutions from below to above as 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,<br />
8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 µg ml -1 .<br />
71<br />
Figure. 4.2.5. Representative UV-spectrum of expected 5 µg ml -1 DS in<br />
(Diclofen) tablet.<br />
73<br />
Figure. 4.2.6. UV spectra showing blank (black), DS containing (blue)<br />
and DS spiked (red) urine.<br />
74<br />
Figure. 4.2.7. UV spectra showing blank (black), DS containing (blue)<br />
and DS spiked (red) serum.<br />
Figure. 4.3.1. DC voltammograms (A) and DP voltammograms (B) of<br />
Paracetamol (c = 100 μmol<br />
75<br />
-1 .l) at CFE in Britton-Robinson<br />
buffer pH 2 to 12 (numbers above curves correspond to<br />
given pH) without electrode regeneration. Inset is<br />
corresponding dependence of peak potential on the pH.<br />
Figure. 4.3.2. Repetitive measurements of 100 µmol L<br />
77<br />
-1 Paracetamol<br />
using DPV at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0 with<br />
regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300<br />
mV Inset is corresponding dependence of peak current on<br />
the number of scans.<br />
79
Figure. 4.3.3. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 20 (3)<br />
40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100 µmol L -1 . Regeneration<br />
potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Background current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence.<br />
Figure. 4.3.4. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 2 (3)<br />
80<br />
4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Regeneration potential<br />
Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV. Background<br />
current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence.<br />
Figure. 4.3.2. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(Paracetamol): 0 (1),<br />
81<br />
0.2 (2), 0,4 (3), 0,6 (4), 0,8 (5), 1 µmol L -1 (6).<br />
Regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300<br />
mV. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
Figure. 4.3.6. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 0,02<br />
81<br />
(3) 0,04, (4) 0,06, (5) 0,08, (6) 0,1 µmol L -1 . Regeneration<br />
potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Background current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence.<br />
Figure. 4.3.3. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol 10 µmol<br />
82<br />
L -1 with Ascorbic acid from 10 to 100 µmol L -1<br />
(concentrations are written above curves in plot) at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, regeneration potential<br />
Ereg1 = –400 mV, and Ereg2 = 1300 mV. Inset is<br />
83<br />
corresponding dependence of peak current of<br />
Paracetamol on concentration of Ascorbic acid.<br />
Figure. 4.3.4. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine with<br />
model sample of Paracetamol (2 – 10 µmol L -1 (A), and<br />
20 – 100 µmol L -1 (B), concentration is written next to<br />
curves in plots) sample at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer<br />
pH 4.0, regeneration potentials Ereg1 = –400 mV, and Ereg2<br />
= 1300 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
84<br />
Figure. 4.4.1. Calibration plot in the range of 10-100 ppm for<br />
pharmaceutical samples<br />
87<br />
Figure. 4.4.2. <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Tablet sample and spikes of 30 ppm, 50<br />
ppm, 70 ppm ibuprofen<br />
88<br />
Figure. 4.4.3. Blank urine and 3 spikes of 10, 20, 30 ppm ibuprofen 90<br />
Figure. 4.4.5. Group Spectra of Ibuprofen Standards 92
Figure. 4.5.1. A and B. DC & DP voltammograms of Salicylic Acid<br />
(c = 100 µmol L -1 ) at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH<br />
2 to 12 (numbers in above curves correspond to given pH).<br />
Inset is corresponding dependence of peak potential on the<br />
pH<br />
Figure. 4.5.2. Measurements of 100 µmol L -1 Salicylic Acid using DPV<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson Buffer pH 2.0 with activation<br />
potential (1) 2000,(2) 1500 and (3) 2200 mV<br />
Figure. 4.5.3. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 8,0 (6) 100 µmol L -1 .<br />
Activation of potential=2200mV for 120 sec<br />
Inset is corresponding calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.4. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2) 2<br />
(3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Activation of<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.5. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
0.2 (3) 0.4, (4) 0.6, (5) 0.8, (6) 1 µmol L -1 . Activation of<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence<br />
Figure.4.5.6. Differential pulse voltammograms of 10 µmol L -1<br />
hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, (1) Electrolyte, (2) 10 µmol L -1<br />
without hydrolysis (3) 10 µmol L -1 Salicylic Acid (4) 10<br />
µmol L -1 after hydrolysis Acetylsalicylic acid. Activation<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec<br />
Figure. 4.5.7. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.8. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at<br />
CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2. c (ASA): (1) 0, (2) 2<br />
(3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential=2200mV for 120 sec. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.9. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0, (2) 0.2 (3) 0.4, (4)<br />
0.6, (5) 0.8, (6) 1 µmol L -1 . Activation potential=2200mV for 120<br />
sec. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence<br />
93<br />
95<br />
96<br />
96<br />
97<br />
98<br />
99<br />
99<br />
100
Figure.4.5.10.Differential pulse voltammograms of 4 µmol L -1 Duofilm<br />
sample with spikes of salicylic acid standard at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) electrolyte, (2)<br />
expected 4 μmol L -1 salicylic acid in sample of Duofilm<br />
(3) 6 μmol L -1 spike, (4) 8 μmol L -1 spike and (5) 10 μmol<br />
L -1 spike. Activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Figure. 4.5.11. Differential pulse voltammograms of 4 µmol L -1 Aspirin<br />
sample with spikes of hydrolyzed acetylsalicylic acid<br />
standard at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA):<br />
(1) electrolyte, (2) expected 4 μmol L -1 salicylic acid in<br />
sample of Aspirin (3) 6 μmol L -1 spike, (4) 8 μmol L -1<br />
spike and (5) 10 μmol L -1 spike. Activation potential 2200<br />
mV<br />
Figure. 4.5.12. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential 2200 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.13. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2)<br />
2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Activation potential<br />
2200 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.14. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0,<br />
(2) 20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential 2200 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence<br />
Figure. 4.5.15. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0,<br />
(2) 2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 µmol L -1 . Activation<br />
potential 2200 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence<br />
Figure.4.5.16.Differential pulse voltammograms of hydrolyzed<br />
acetylsalicylic acid 5 μmolL -1 with ascorbic acid 5-100<br />
µmol L -1 at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0.<br />
Activation potential 2200 mV<br />
101<br />
102<br />
103<br />
103<br />
105<br />
105<br />
106
List of Abbreviations<br />
AdSV Adsorptive Stripping Voltammetry<br />
AgA–CFE Silver Amalgam Carbon Film Electrode<br />
AgA–PE Silver Amalgam Paste Electrode<br />
AgE Silver Electrode<br />
AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists<br />
ASA Acetylsalicylic Acid<br />
ATR Attenuated Total Reflection<br />
AuE Gold Electrode<br />
CFE Carbon Film Electrode<br />
CNS Central Nerves System<br />
COX Cyclo-Oxygenase<br />
CPE Carbon Paste Electrode<br />
CV Cyclic Voltammetry<br />
DDP Differential Pulse Polarography<br />
DME Dropping Mercury Electrode<br />
DPV Differential Pulse Voltammetry<br />
DS Diclofenac Sodium<br />
E1/2 Half Wave Potential<br />
FIA Flow Injection Analysis<br />
FT-IR Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy<br />
FT-NIR Fourier Transform Near-Infrared<br />
GC Gas Chromatography<br />
GC– MS Gas Chromatography Mass Spectroscopy<br />
GCE Glassy Carbon Electrode<br />
GGE Glassy Graphite Electrode<br />
HEC <strong>Higher</strong> <strong>Education</strong> <strong>Commission</strong><br />
HMDE Hanging Mercury Drop Electrode<br />
HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography<br />
HT-GLC High-Temperature Gas–Liquid Chromatography<br />
Hz Hertz<br />
IBP Ibuprofen<br />
LOD Limit of Detection<br />
LOQ Limit of Quantification<br />
LSV Linear Sweep Voltammetry<br />
mg/kg Milligram per Kilogram<br />
mg/kg /b.w/day Milligram per Kilogram per Body Weight per Day<br />
mg/L Milligram per Liter<br />
mm Millimeter<br />
mol.L -1 Mole per liter<br />
mV Milli volt<br />
mV s -1 Milli volt per second<br />
nA Nano Ampere<br />
NIR Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
nM Nano Molar<br />
NMR Nuclear Magnetic Resonance<br />
NPV Normal Pulse Voltammetry<br />
NSAIDs Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs<br />
PC Paracetamol<br />
PLS Partial Least Square<br />
ppb parts per billion<br />
ppm parts per million<br />
PtSE Platinum Solid Electrode<br />
PVC Polyvinyl Chloride<br />
RE Reference Electrode<br />
RMSEC Root Mean Standard Error of Calibration<br />
RMSEP Root Mean Square Error of Prediction<br />
RP-HPLC Reserved <strong>Ph</strong>ase-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography<br />
rpm revolutions per minute<br />
RSD Relative Standard Deviation<br />
SA Salicylic Acid<br />
SPME Solid <strong>Ph</strong>ase Microextraction<br />
SWV Square Wave Voltammetry<br />
TLC Thin Layer Chromatography<br />
TOF-MS Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry<br />
TQ Turbo Quant<br />
V/s Volt per second<br />
v/v Volume by volume<br />
WE Working Electrode<br />
WHO World Health Organization<br />
μg/kg Microgram per kilogram<br />
µg L -1 Microgram per liter<br />
µg/g Microgram per gram<br />
µL Micro liter<br />
µm Micrometer<br />
µM Micro mole<br />
µmol L -1 Micro mole per liter
INTRODUCTION<br />
1.1. Analgesics / NSAIDs -An overview<br />
Chapter-01<br />
A drug designed to control pain. Analgesic comes from the Greek word an means without<br />
and algesis means sense of pain collectively called without sense of pain. They are the<br />
commonly prescribed and widely consumed (over-the-counter) formulation in the world.<br />
Although analgesics are generally supposed to be safe agents, harmful effect may occur<br />
in the case of chronic abuse and acute overdose (Suzanne & Steven, 1998). Analgesics<br />
are used in the treatment of a broad range of therapeutic situations, they are used in<br />
treatment of both chronic and acute pain symptom such as dysmenorrheal or cephalgia.<br />
Antipyresis is also common sign for the administration of these drugs, mainly in the<br />
children.<br />
Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the chemically heterogeneous group<br />
of compounds, often chemically unrelated (although most of them are organic acids)<br />
which nevertheless share certain therapeutic actions and adverse effects Goodman &<br />
gilmans (2007). It is given as single dose or in short-term alternating therapy; it can<br />
reduce mild to moderate ache. The anti-inflammatory effects become apparent when it<br />
may give up to 21 day. The combined anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects make them<br />
helpful for the symptomatic relief of painful situation including rheumatic disorders such<br />
as rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and the spondyloarthropathies, and also in peri-<br />
articular disorders, and soft-tissue rheumatism. Some NSAIDs are used in the<br />
management of postoperative pain (Bidaut-Russell & Gabriel, 2001).<br />
1
Anti-inflammatory activity of drug shows the small differences, between the NSAIDs and<br />
preference is mostly empirical. If one NSAID fail to respond the patient, in that case<br />
another drug may be selected for treatment. However, it has been recommended that<br />
NSAIDs associated with a low risk of gastrointestinal toxicity should generally be<br />
preferred and the lowest effective dose used. NSAIDs are usually given by mouth, with<br />
or after food, although some such as diclofenac, ketorolac, lornoxicam, parecoxib, and<br />
tenoxicam can be given intravenously and intramuscularly. Some NSAIDs are applied<br />
topically or given rectally as suppositories. Several NSAIDs are used in ophthalmic<br />
preparations for the inhibition of intra-operative miosis, control of postoperative ocular<br />
inflammation.<br />
1.1.1. Mechanism of Action (NSAIDs)<br />
Cyclo-oxygenases play an important role in the biosynthesis of prostaglandins. NSAIDs<br />
inhibit cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) and cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) and it is thought<br />
that inhibition of COX-1 is connected with unfavorable gastrointestinal effects while<br />
inhibition of COX-2 is related with anti-inflammatory activity (Hayllar, et al., 1995,<br />
Richardson and Emery, 1996) hence the interest in preferential or selective inhibitors of<br />
COX-2. COX-2 inhibitors may also have a potential use in other diseases in which COX-<br />
2 might be implicated (Jouzeau, et al., 1997, Hawkey, 1999). There is evidence that<br />
NSAIDs may also have a central mechanism of action that augments the peripheral<br />
mechanism (Gupta & Tarkkila 1998; Cashman, 1996).<br />
In view of the analgesic (Paracetamol, Aspirin, Diclofenac and Brufen) studied during the<br />
current project it is essential to focus on the properties, uses and toxic effects of these<br />
drugs.<br />
2
1.2. Paracetamol<br />
1.2.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias:<br />
Fig. 1.1. Structural formula of Paracetamol (PC)<br />
Chemical name: 4´-Hydroxyacetanilide; N-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)acetamide<br />
Molecular formula: C8H9NO2 =151.2<br />
According to British, European and United States <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias Paracetamol<br />
(Acetaminophen) is a white crystalline odourless powder. It is sparingly soluble in water,<br />
freely in alcohol and sodium hydroxide and very slightly soluble in dichloromethane<br />
(Jacoby, 2000). It should be protected from light and stored in airtight containers.<br />
Paracetamol (N-acetyl-p-aminophenol) is an effective alternative to aspirin as an<br />
analgesic, antipyretic agent and safe up to therapeutic doses. It work as painkiller by<br />
control prostaglandin’s synthesis in the central nervous system and reduced fever by<br />
painkilling hypothalamic heat-regulating center (Goyal and Singh 2006; de los, et al.,<br />
2005; Moreira, et al., 2005; Campanero, et al., 1999). Paracetamol is readily absorbed<br />
after administration and widely distributed throughout most body fluids (Criado, et al.,<br />
2000), as a weak acid (pKa value 9.5), it gets quickly absorbed and distributed after oral<br />
administration and is immediately emitted through urine (Goyal and Singh 2006;<br />
Parojčić, et al., 2003). Generally paracetamol does not shows any unsafe side effects but<br />
hypersensitivity or overdoses in few cases lead to the formation of some liver and<br />
nephrotoxic metabolites (Goyal and Singh 2006; Patel, 1992).<br />
3
1.2.2. Uses and Administration<br />
Paracetamol is often self-prescribed and given by mouth or as a rectal suppository for<br />
relief of moderate pain, fever, lumber pain, backache, migraine or non-specific<br />
indications without any medical control (Mcgregir, et al., 2003; Nikles, et al., 2005). It<br />
has been reported as a useful drug in osteoarthritis therapy and in recent years,<br />
postoperative pain as well (Brandt, 2003). After ingestion of an overdose amount of<br />
paracetamol, the accumulation of harmful metabolite may cause severe and occasionally<br />
fatal nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity (Xu and Li, 2004; Maria, et al., 2005). However,<br />
the frequent use of paracetamol in late pregnancy may be associated with an increased<br />
risk of persistent wheezing in the infant (Farquhar; 2009; Shaheen, et al., 2002).<br />
Usual doses in children are: under one to five years, 120 to 250 mg and six to twelve<br />
years, 250-500 mg. The normally adult dose by 30 days is 0.5-1 g every four to six hrs up<br />
to a highest of 4 g each day. These doses may be given every four to six hrs when<br />
necessary up to a maximum of four doses in one day (Prescott, 1996).<br />
1.2.3. Adverse Effects<br />
Side-effects of paracetamol are exceptional and typically soft, although haematological<br />
reactions including leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, agranulocytosis and<br />
pancytopenia have been described. Skin rashes and other hypersensitivity reactions occur<br />
rarely (Xu and Li, 2004; Martin & McLean, 1998; KocaoÄŸlu, et al., 1997; Mugford &<br />
Tarloff, 1997; Nagasawa, et al., 1996; Ishida, et al., 1997).<br />
4
1.2.4. Overdosage and its Treatment<br />
Ingestion of as little as ten to fifteen g of paracetamol by adults may cause severe<br />
hepatocellular necrosis and less often renal tubular necrosis. However, chronic use of<br />
supratherapeutic doses in children has resulted in unintentional overdoses and severe<br />
hepatotoxicity (Miles, et al., 1999; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on<br />
Drugs, 2001; Wyszecka-Kaszuba, et al., 2003).<br />
Activated charcoal may be used to reduce gastrointestinal absorption, if it can be given<br />
within 1 hour of the overdose, and if greater than 150 mg/kg of paracetamol has been<br />
consumed. However, if acetylcysteine or methionine is to be given by mouth the charcoal<br />
is best cleared from the stomach to prevent its reducing the absorption of the antidote.<br />
There is little evidence that gastric lavage is of benefit in those who have overdosed<br />
solely with paracetamol.<br />
1.2.5. Precautions<br />
Paracetamol should be prescribed with carefully to patients with harmed liver or kidney<br />
and alcohol dependence patients. About 0.01% population of the United state and 0.02%<br />
population of the Australian were appraised in hospital every year because of PC<br />
poisoning (de los et al., 2005; Dargan & Jones, 2003).<br />
5
1.3. Aspirin<br />
1.3.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias<br />
Fig. 1.2. Structural formula of Aspirin (ASA)<br />
Chemical name: O-Acetylsalicylic acid; 2-Acetoxybenzoic acid<br />
Molecular formula: C9H8O4 =180.2<br />
According to British, European and United States <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias Acetylsalicylic Acid<br />
or Aspirin is white crystalline powder, commonly tubular or needle-like, stable in dry, air<br />
has a faint odour or odourless, while in moist air it steadily hydrolyzes to salicylic and<br />
acetic acids. It is slightly soluble in water but freely in alcohol, chloroform and sparingly<br />
soluble in absolute ether (Jacoby, 2000), store in airtight containers.<br />
Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), shown in Figure 2, more popularly known as aspirin, is one<br />
of the oldest medicines that still plays an important role in modern therapeutics. It is<br />
widely employed in pharmaceutical formulations for the relief of headaches, fever,<br />
muscular pain, and inflammation (Xianwen, et al., 2009). Acetylsalicylic acid or aspirin,<br />
was introduced in the late 1890s (Dreser, 1899). It was first synthesized in 1897, by Felix<br />
Hoffmann, in the Farbenfabrik Freidrich Bayer laboratories, in Elberfeld, Germany<br />
(Hammerschmidt, 1998; Sneader, 2000; Moore, et al., 1995; Kibbey, et al., 1992).<br />
Salicylates, in the form of willow bark, were used as an analgesic during the time of<br />
Hippocrates (Pirker, et al., 2004). This substance is consumed worldwide (Erica et al.,<br />
2010; Elwood, 2001) indicates the importance of the development of new analytical<br />
methods to assess not only the quality but also the authenticity of the product (Erica et<br />
al., 2010).<br />
6
The analgesic and anti-pyretic efficiency of aspirin was promptly comproved, however<br />
only after the years 1940 it began to be employed in higher doses as anti-inflammatory<br />
agent. When its mechanism of action began to be understood the possibility for use<br />
against cardiac and circulatory disturbances became evident (Muralidharan et al., 2008;<br />
Eccles, et al., 1998).<br />
The rate of decomposition of ASA to salicylic acid (SA) and acetic acid (AA) is reliant<br />
on solution pH and temperature (Lu & Tsai, 2010). In the pH range 11-12 ASA is quickly<br />
hydrolyzed, in the pH range 4-8 its hydrolysis rate is slow while highest constancy is<br />
attained at pH 2-3 (Connors, et al., 1979).<br />
1.3.2. Uses and Administration<br />
It is used in acute conditions such as arthralgia, headaches, myalgia and other cases<br />
involving mild analgesia. Once ingested, ASA is quickly hydrolysed in the body to<br />
formulate salicylic acid (SA), the compound that is primarily responsible for the<br />
pharmacological activity of ASA (Houshmand, et al., 2008). It is also used for reduce the<br />
excitements of viral or bacterial origin (Houshmand, et al., 2008; Boopathi, et al., 2004,<br />
De Carvalho, et al., 2004). In general, the salicylates action is achieved by the SA<br />
contents, although some of the characteristic properties of the ASA are their capability<br />
for protein acetylation. The esters in the phenolic or carboxylic functional groups alter the<br />
power in the toxicity of salicylates (Torriero, et al., 2004; Hardman, et al., 1996).<br />
Aspirin act as inhibitors of the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase, which outcome in the direct<br />
inhibition of the bio-synthesis of thromboxanes and prostaglandins from arachidonic acid.<br />
7
It has also been used in the management of inflammation and pain in acute and chronic<br />
rheumatic disorders such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing<br />
spondylitis and osteoarthritis. In the treatment of minor febrile conditions, such as colds<br />
or influenza, aspirin can reduce temperature and relieve headache and joint and muscular<br />
pains (Vane, et al., 2006, Thun, et al., 2002).<br />
Aspirin is usually taken by mouth. Various dosage forms are available including plain<br />
uncoated tablets, buffered tablets, dispersible tablets, enteric-coated tablets, and<br />
modified-release tablets. In some instances aspirin may be given rectally by suppository.<br />
The usual oral dose of aspirin as an analgesic and antipyretic is 300-900 mg, repeated<br />
every 4 to 6 hours according to clinical needs, to a maximum of 4 g daily. The dose as<br />
suppositories is 600-900 mg every four hrs to a maximum of 3.6 g every day.<br />
1.3.3. Adverse Effects<br />
The most common adverse effects of therapeutic doses of aspirin are gastrointestinal<br />
disturbances such as nausea, dyspepsia, and vomiting (Dirckx, et al., 2009). This<br />
substance is highly consumed in all over the world, and its remedial act and its toxic<br />
effects make it a drug that is subjected to continuous researches (Majdi, et al., 2007;<br />
Elwood, 2001), and its antipyretic effects have been recognized for more than 200 years<br />
(Stone, 1763). However, the antiplatelet activity of this agent was not recognized until<br />
almost 70 years later (Awtry & Loscalzo, 2000; Wong, et al., 2004). Researchers have<br />
also demonstrated therapeutic benefit of aspirin in a variety of cardiovascular diseases<br />
with its doses of 30 to 1500 mg/d (Awtry & Loscalzo, 2000, Wong, et al., 2004, Patrono,<br />
1994, Fuster et al., 1993, Hennekens, et al., 1997, Manson, et al., 1991).<br />
8
The effect of salicylates on cancer treatment has been studied, too (Thun et al., 2002,<br />
Shen, et al., 2004, Keloff, et al., 2004, Hardwick, et al., 2004, Martnett, 1992). Moreover,<br />
inhibition of growth of bacteria Helicobacter pylori (Wang, et al., 2003) and<br />
Staphyloccocus aureus (Kupferwasser, et al., 2003) has been also described. Kidney<br />
damage related with the therapeutic utilization of aspirin alone appears to be relatively<br />
rare (Dubach, et al., 1991, Perneger, et al., 1994). Aspirin-induced liver injury is<br />
frequently reversible on stopping the drug (Lewis, 1984, Freeland, et al., 1988). Aspirin<br />
burns when ulceration of the mucosal layer of the lips) developed in a 26-year old woman<br />
after getting an aspirin-containing powder for a migraine (Dellinger and Livingston,<br />
1998).<br />
1.3.4. Overdosage and its Treatment<br />
In case of acute oral salicylate overdosage, repeated doses of activated charcoal may be<br />
given by mouth if the patient is suspected of ingesting more than 250 mg/kg of salicylate.<br />
Intravenous sodium bicarbonate is given to enhance urinary salicylate excretion if plasma<br />
salicylate concentration exceeds 500 micrograms/mL (350 micrograms/mL in children).<br />
Haemodialysis or haemoperfusion are also effective methods of removing salicylate from<br />
the plasma.<br />
1.3.5. Precautions<br />
Aspirin should not be given to patients with haemophilia or other haemorrhagic disorders<br />
or the patients with a history of sensitivity reactions to aspirin, including those in whom<br />
attacks of asthma, angioedema, urticaria, or rhinitis have been precipitated by such drugs<br />
although low-dose aspirin might be given in some pregnant patients as an analgesic.<br />
9
1.4. Diclofen<br />
1.4.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias<br />
Fig. 1.3. Structural formula of Diclofenac Sodium (DS)<br />
Chemical name: Sodium 2-[(2, 6-dichlorophenyl) amino] phenyl acetate<br />
Molecular formula: C14H10Cl2NNaO2 =318.1<br />
According to British, European and United States <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias diclofenac Sodium is<br />
a white to slightly yellowish (off-white), slightly hygroscopic, crystalline powder. It is<br />
sparingly soluble in water, alcohol, slightly in acetone and freely in methyl alcohol,<br />
practically insoluble in chloroform and in ether (Bahram, 2008). pH of a 1% solution in<br />
water is between 7.0 and 8.5. Store in airtight containers and protect from light (Rients &<br />
Jan, 2008).<br />
1.4.2 Uses and Administration<br />
A phenylacetic acid derivative, Diclofenac is an NSAID (Matin, et al., 2005). It is used<br />
mostly as the sodium salt for the release of inflammation and pain in many situations:<br />
joint disorders and musculoskeletal such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and<br />
ankylosing spondylitis; peri-articular disarray such as tendinitis and bursitis; soft-tissue<br />
disarray such as strains and sprains; and other painful circumstances such as renal colic,<br />
dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute gout subsequent surgical processes (Lala, et al.,<br />
2002). Eye drops of diclofenac sodium are used for the prevention of intra-operative<br />
10
miosis for the duration of cataract removal, for the medication of inflammation following<br />
surgery or laser treatment of the eye, for pain in corneal epithelial defects following<br />
surgery or accidental trauma, and for the relief of ocular signs and symptoms of seasonal<br />
allergic conjunctivitis.<br />
The usual dose of diclofenac sodium by mouth or rectally is 75 to 150 mg daily in<br />
divided doses. In children of 1 to 12 years old, the dose by mouth for juvenile idiopathic<br />
arthritis is one to three mg/kg daily in divided doses.<br />
1.4.3. Adverse Effects<br />
There may be pain and, occasionally, tissue damage at the site of injection when<br />
diclofenac is given intramuscularly. Diclofenac suppositories may cause local irritation.<br />
Transient burning and stinging may occur with diclofenac ophthalmic solution; more<br />
serious corneal adverse effects have also occurred. The main effects on the blood reports<br />
are haematological abnormalities including haemolytic anaemia (López, et al., 1995)<br />
agranulocytosis (Colomina & Garcia, 1989) neutropenia (Kim & Kovacs, 1995) and<br />
thrombocytopenia (George & Rahi, 1995) happening in patients given diclofenac.<br />
Localized slow bleeding and inhibition of platelet aggregation (Price & Obeid, 1989)<br />
bruising and prolonged bleeding time (Khazan, et al., 1990) have also been reported.<br />
Rectal management of diclofenac suppositories may origin local reactions such as<br />
burning and itching. Nephrotic syndrome (Beun, et al., 1987; Yinnon, et al., 1987;<br />
Tattersall, et al., 1992) described in patients taking diclofenac. Rise of clinical hepatitis<br />
and serum amino transferase activity (Ryley, et al., 1989) including fatal fulminant<br />
hepatitis (Purcell, et al., 1991) have occurred in patients getting diclofenac.<br />
11
1.4.4 Precautions<br />
Use of intravenous diclofenac is contra-indicated in patients with moderate or severe<br />
renal impairment, hypovolaemia, or dehydration. Intravenous diclofenac should not be<br />
used in patients with a history of haemorrhagic diathesis, cerebrovascular bleeding<br />
(including suspected), or asthma nor in patients undergoing surgery with a high risk of<br />
haemorrhage.<br />
1.5. Brufen<br />
1.5.1. <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias<br />
Fig. 1.4. Structural formula of Ibuprofen (IBP)<br />
Chemical name: [2-{4-(2-methylpropyl)phenyl} propanoic acid]<br />
Molecular formula: C13H18O2 =206.3<br />
According to British, European and United States <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeias ibuprofen is a<br />
colourless crystals or white crystalline powder having a minute characteristic odor. It is<br />
practically insoluble in water, freely soluble in acetone, in dichloromethane, chloroform<br />
and in methyl alcohol. It dissolves in dilute solutions of alkali hydroxides and carbonates.<br />
Store in airtight containers.<br />
1.5.2. Uses and Administration<br />
Ibuprofen, a propionic acid derivative, is an important anti-inflammatory, analgesic and<br />
antipyretic medicine with considerably less gastrointestinal adverse effect than other<br />
NSAIDs (Velasco, et al., 2010; Donald, et al., 2010; Whittle, et al., 2003) employed in<br />
12
the administration of mild to moderate pain in situation such as headache,<br />
dysmenorrhoea, postoperative pain, including migraine, musculoskeletal and dental pain;<br />
joint disorders such as osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis;<br />
peri-articular disorders such as tenosynovitis and bursitis; soft-tissue disorders such as<br />
strains and sprains. NSAIDs is also used to lower fever (Clara, et al., 2009; Santini, et al.,<br />
2006).<br />
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis generally require higher doses of ibuprofen than those<br />
with osteoarthritis. The recommended dose for fever reduction in adults is 200 to 400 mg<br />
every 4 to 6 hours to a highest of 1.2 g every day (Nanda et al., 2010). In children the<br />
usual dose by mouth for the treatment of pain or fever is 20 to 30 mg/kg daily in divided<br />
doses. Ibuprofen is also applied topically as a 5% cream, foam, gel, or spray solution; a<br />
10% gel is also available.<br />
1.5.3. Adverse Effects<br />
Symptoms of vomiting, tinnitus and nausea have been detailed after ibuprofen an<br />
excessive dose. Moreover severe toxicity is unusual, but gastric emptying chased by<br />
supportive measures is suggested if the amount ingested within the previous hour exceeds<br />
four hundred mg/kg.<br />
Effect on the blood including agranulocytosis, aplastic anaemia (Gryfe & Rubenzahl,<br />
1976) pure white-cell aplasia (Mamus, et al., 1986) and thrombocytopenia ( Jain, 1994 )<br />
have been reported in patients taking ibuprofen. Fatal haemolytic anaemia occurred in a<br />
man taking ibuprofen and oxazepam ( Guidry et al., 1979 ). A review of NSAID-related<br />
CNS adverse effects summarized twenty three literature reports of NSAID-associated<br />
13
aseptic meningitis (Hoppmann, et al., 1991), while seventeen reports involved ibuprofen<br />
patients with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Typically the reaction is seen<br />
in patients who have just restarted NSAID therapy after a gap in their treatment. The<br />
authors believed this to be the first reported case of ibuprofen-induced aseptic meningitis<br />
in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis (Horn & Jarrett, 1997). Hyponatraemia has been<br />
described in patients receiving ibuprofen (García, et al., 2003). Ibuprofen may be<br />
associated with a lower risk of upper gastrointestinal effects than some other NSAIDs,<br />
but nonetheless it can cause vomiting, nausea, dyspepsia, gastrointestinal bleeding,<br />
perforation and peptic ulcers. Colitis and its exacerbation have also occurred (Ravi, et al.,<br />
1986, Clements, et al., 1990). Adverse renal effects with ibuprofen include an increase in<br />
serum creatinine concentration (Whelton, et al., 1990), Acute renal failure (Fernando, et<br />
al., 1994) and nephrotic syndrome (Justiniani, 1986) cystitis, haematuria, and interstitial<br />
nephritis may occur as well.<br />
1.5.4. Overdosage and Treatment<br />
Usually after ingestion of large dose of ibuprofen serious toxicity may occur, including<br />
seizures, hypotension, apnoea, coma, and renal failure. Treatment of Ibuprofen<br />
overdosage is entirely supportive. Gastric lavage and activated charcoal may be of benefit<br />
within 1 hour of ingestion. Multiple doses of activated charcoal may be useful in<br />
enhancing elimination of Ibuprofen with long half-lives.<br />
14
LITERATURE REVIEW<br />
2.1. Analytical Techniques for Assessment of NSAIDs<br />
Chapter-02<br />
Various methods are has been developed for NSAIDs determination in different types of<br />
samples (Sirajuddin, 2007). These include, titrimetry , thin layer chromatography (TLC),<br />
colorimetry, Gas Chromatography/ Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS), high performance<br />
liquid chromatography (HPLC), Voltammetry, Flow injection analysis (FIA),<br />
Spectrofluorimetry, UV/visible Spectrophotometry, Chemiluminescence, NMR, FTIR,<br />
Raman and Solid-state Linear Dichroic Infrared (IR-LD) Spectroscopy.<br />
Ayora et al., 2000, reported a direct sensor based determination for paracetamol analysis<br />
using easy flow-through ultraviolet-visible optosensing device based on the solid support<br />
packed in the flow cell after that continuously observing their absorbance on the solid<br />
phase at 264 nm. The proposed method was profitably applied to the PC in<br />
pharmaceuticals formulations.<br />
Fujiwara et al., 2002, developed a systematic approach for the aqueous crystallization of<br />
paracetamol. The solubility curve and the solution concentration of paracetamol in water<br />
were determined using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy coupled with<br />
attenuated total reflection (ATR) mode and chemometrics.<br />
Sun et al., 2003, reported a sensitive method on HPLC coupled with UV detector for the<br />
simultaneously find out of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) possessing<br />
an arylpropionic acid moiety in plasma and pharmaceutical formulations.<br />
15
Šatínský et al., 2004, been described the molecularly imprinted polymer as a carbon fiber<br />
microelectrode coating for determining paracetamol using cyclic voltammetry (CV).<br />
A voltammetric method for the determination of ascorbic acid with Carbon Paste<br />
Electrodes (CPEs), was applied with good results to several dosage forms (tablets, vials)<br />
and even to an effervescent dosage form containing a mixture of ascorbic and<br />
acetylsalicylic acid (Sandulescu et al., 2000).<br />
2.2. Electrochemical Techniques<br />
Use of electrochemical methods, especially the voltammetric and amperometric in<br />
analysis paid attention as sensitive, cost-effective and accurate way of analysis in last<br />
decades.<br />
Voltammetric methods have been developed due to high sensitivity these techniques<br />
offer, principally when a variety of redox mediators (Rover et al., 2000; Lobo et al.,<br />
1997, Fung & Luk, 1989) are employed, decreasing the interference levels in the<br />
determinations of compounds present in complex matrices such as pharmaceuticals and<br />
body fluids (Rover et al., 2000). Square wave voltammetry (SWV) is regarded as very<br />
responsive and direct analytical techniques, which has used for the fast and sensitive<br />
determination of a wide range of organic molecules, with low nonfaradaic current and<br />
high sensitivity. In most instances this method presents further advantages such as no<br />
need for sample pretreatment and less sensitivity to matrix effects than other analytical<br />
techniques. (Codognoto et al., 2002; Souza et al., 2003 ; Pedrosa et al., 2003;<br />
Osteryoung., 1985).<br />
16
Nowadays a number of polymer films are used in the electroanalytical field due to easy<br />
generated on the electrode surface than monolayers. To improve the selectivity and<br />
sensitivity for the determination of PC various polymeric based films modified electrodes<br />
has been developed (Chenghang Wang, et al., 2006; Sandik & Wallace, 1993; Piro et al.,<br />
2000).<br />
The electroanalytical features and performances of CPEs for fabrication of chemo and<br />
biosensors through the modification of carbon paste and their analytical applications are<br />
well documented (Goyal, & Singh, 2006; Vire et al., 1994; Kalcher, 1990; Kalcher et al.,<br />
1995; Gorton, 1995; Campanella et al., 1992; Kalcher et al., 1997).<br />
It is well known from the molecular structure of paracetamol, that it is electrochemically<br />
active, and its electrochemical properties on a choice of electrodes, such as glassy carbon<br />
electrodes (GCE) (Wang et al., 2006; Bolado et al., 2009; Santos et al., 2008;<br />
Wangfuengkanagul et al., 2002; Gimenes et al., 2010), screen print electrode (Fanjul-<br />
Bolado et al., 2009), gold electrodes (Santos et al., 2008, Pedrosa et al., 2006), and<br />
diamond electrode have been investigated (Wangfuengkanagul et al., 2002).<br />
The cyclic voltammetric studies concerning the electrochemical oxidation of<br />
acetaminophen were also explained (Sandulescu, 2000; Miner et al., 1981; Benschoten et<br />
al., 1983).<br />
Zen et al., 1997, used the Nafion/ruthenium oxide pyrochlore chemically modified<br />
electrode using SWV for the simultaneous determination of acetaminophen and caffeine<br />
in drug formulations. The detection limits were 2.2 and 1.2 μM for caffeine and<br />
17
acetaminophen, respectively. The analytical application of the proposed method was<br />
applied in several commercially available drugs, without any preliminary treatment. Fang<br />
Fang et al., 1997, proposed an oxidation process of acetaminophen at a platinum<br />
electrode by parallel incident spectroelectrochemistry. The results exposed that the<br />
acetaminophen redox reaction was a diffusion-controlled one-electron quasi reversible<br />
process, this process confirm by cyclic voltammetric experiments. Capsules were<br />
analyzed without pretreatment using linear range of acetaminophen with a R 2 =0.9985.<br />
The voltammetric and spectrophotometric methods which were used to determine<br />
ascorbic acid and acetaminophen in different quantity forms (tablets, effervescent and<br />
vials). The electroanalytical study of acetaminophen, ascorbic and some mixtures of these<br />
compounds in different ratios has been made by using a (CPE-graphite:solid paraffin 2:1)<br />
as working electrode (Sandulescu et al., 2000). Wangfuengkanagul et al., 2002, reported<br />
the electrochemical behavior of acetaminophen in phosphate (pH 8) buffer solution at a<br />
boron-doped diamond thin film electrode using hydrodynamic voltammetry. Torriero, et<br />
al., 2004, reported a cyclic and DPV method for the electrochemical oxidation of SA on a<br />
glassy carbon electrode (GCE). The method was linear over the salicylic acid<br />
concentration at the range of 1–60 µgml -1 .<br />
Goyal, et al., 2005, a reproducible method for determined the paracetamol using a<br />
nanogold modified indium tin oxide electrode were developed. Under conditions of<br />
differential pulse voltammetry, 2.0x10 -7 –1.5x10 -3 M was range of linear calibration curve<br />
with a correlation coefficient of 0.997 was obtained.<br />
18
An additional approach by Goyal, et al., 2006, for voltammetric analysis of PC was<br />
carried out at C60-modified glassy carbon electrode, which demonstrates steady response<br />
with better sensitivity and selectivity. A linear calibration curve was obtained in the range<br />
of 0.05–1.5 mM paracetamol concentration with sensitivity of the method as 13.04<br />
µAmM −1 having correlation coefficient of 0.985.<br />
Chenghang et al., 2006, fabricated a novel L-cysteine film modified electrode effectively<br />
applied for the analysis of acetaminophen by means of an electrochemical oxidation<br />
procedure in tablets and human urine.<br />
Jia et al., 2007, reported the electrochemical determination of acetaminophen on the<br />
AMP SAMs/Au in Britton–Robinson (BR) solution of buffer by SWV. The modified<br />
electrode showed a significant enhancement in the oxidation current response for<br />
acetaminophen in comparison to a bare gold electrode. Linear calibration curve were<br />
obtained in the range of 2.0 ×10 –6 – 4.0 × 10 –3 M.<br />
Kachoosangi et al., 2008 reported a sensitive and selective electroanalytical method for<br />
the analysis of paracetamol utilizizng adsorptive stripping voltammetric technique at a<br />
multi walled carbon nanotube modified basal plane pyrolytic graphite electrode<br />
(Kachoosangi, et al., 2008).<br />
Saraswathyamma et al., 2008, reported gold electrode modified with dipyrromethene-Cu<br />
(II) derivatives possessing two dodecane alkyl chains. The presence of dipyrromethene-<br />
Cu(II) redox centers on the electrode surface was proved by CV and Osteryoung square-<br />
wave voltammetry for determination of PC in plasma. Skeika et al., 2008, investigated<br />
19
the simultaneous electrochemical determination of paracetamol and dypirone by<br />
differential pulse voltammetry technique (DPV) using an unmodified carbon paste<br />
electrode. The multivariate calibration methodology based on partial least square<br />
regression (PLSR) was employed for the voltammetric peaks of paracetamol and<br />
dypirone, due to overlapping.<br />
Parviz et al., 2009 proposed the highly stable, convenient method for the electrochemical<br />
oxidation of naproxen and PC using dysprosium nanowire modified carbon paste<br />
electrode With SWV. A low detection limit for PC and naproxen, were observed by this<br />
method.<br />
Elen et al., 2009, reported a direct determination of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in<br />
pharmaceutical formulations using SWV and a boron-doped diamond electrode (BDD).<br />
The obtained relative standard deviation was smaller than 1.4% with a detection limit of<br />
2.0 µmol L -1 . Nada & Mehar, 2009 reported a promising voltammetric sensors based on<br />
the modification of platinum (Pt) and poly (3 methylthiophene) (PMT) electrodes with<br />
palladinum (Pd) nanoparticles were achieved for the determination of paracetamol.<br />
Shahrokhian & Elham, 2010, have simultaneous determined acetaminophen and ascorbic<br />
acid in the presence of isoniazid by CV and DPV using CPE modified with thionine<br />
immobilized on multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT).<br />
Irena Baranowska & Marta, 2009, proposed a sensitive and fast method for the<br />
quantification of PC and its glucuronide (PG) and sulfate (PS) metabolites. The<br />
electrochemical properties of the compounds were examined by CV on GCE.<br />
20
Bruna et al., 2009, developed simple and highly selective SWV or DP voltammetric<br />
method for the single or simultaneous determination of caffeine and paracetamol in<br />
aqueous media (acetate buffer, pH 4.5) on a BDDE. The limits of detection for the<br />
simultaneous determination of caffeine and paracetamol were 3.5×10 −8 mol L −1 and<br />
4.9×10 −7 mol L −1 , respectively.<br />
It was also planned to develop a selective methods for PC analysis in pharmaceutical<br />
determinations, and the methods were based on reaction between ethylacetoacetate and<br />
PC by sulfuric acid (dehydrating agent) producing a coumarinic compound, which was<br />
spectrofluorimetrically calculated (Schirmer et al., 1991; Walily et al., 1999; Gikas et al.,<br />
2003).<br />
Xu et al., 2009, FI analysis for the determination of acetaminophen investigated by an<br />
amperometric detector with gold nanoparticle modified carbon paste electrode. The<br />
obtained results were found to be comparable with HPLC.<br />
A vast deal of interest has been point out on the Substances immobilized onto the<br />
electrode surface and chemically modified electrodes under the effect of external electric<br />
fields able to mediating fast electron transfer (Majdi, 2007; Pournaghi-Azar & Sabzi,<br />
2004, Golabi & Irannejad, 2005).<br />
2.3. Spectroscopic Methods<br />
Spectrofluorimetry for the UV–visible region can be employed to achieve the<br />
measurements in solid matrix (Moreira et al., 2004), leading to favorable characteristics<br />
of sensitivity, straightforwardness, selectivity, rapidity and ruggedness etc.<br />
21
Nondestructive analyzes were carried out that follow the current tendency towards clean<br />
chemistry. Moreover, the opportunity of optical-fiber accessories for in situ and/or on-<br />
line analysis (Bosch, 2006; Utzinger and Richards-Kortum, 2003) becomes possible.<br />
Now a day, this approach has scarcely been exploited in relation to solid samples of<br />
pharmaceutical importance. Regarding the paracetamol analysis, a literature review tells<br />
that it generally involves the derivative reactions (Pulgarin & Bermejo, 1996; Murillo &<br />
Garcia, 1996) because paracetamol was not basically fluorescent in aqueous solutions. In<br />
this view beginning experiments confirmed that paracetamol was fluorescent in the solid<br />
phase (Bosch, 2006).<br />
Various spectrofluorimetric methods reported for the quantification of single PC or as a<br />
mixture with other drugs in pharmaceutical preparations, such as indirect determination<br />
using Ce (IV) as an oxidant agent (de los, 2005; Amann et al., 1980), reaction with<br />
fluorescamine (Nakamura & Tamura., 1980), 1-nitroso-2-naphthol (Shah & Balaraman,<br />
1999), oxidation with 2,2-dihydroxy- 5,5-diacetyldiaminebiphenyl (Vilchez et al., 1995),<br />
potassium hexacyanoferate (III) (Pulgarín & Bermejo, 1996). Conversely, several of<br />
these methods show low selectivity and interference with other medicines and excipients<br />
can be predicted.<br />
Continuous flow systems are valuable devices for the automation, miniaturization and<br />
preliminary operations, particularly as regards simplification of analytical processes.<br />
These systems afford the development of various chemical reactions and the<br />
implementation of reliable separation techniques with a view to increasing sensitivity and<br />
selectivity (Criado et al., 2000; Valcarcel et al., 1998;). The on-line microwave assisted<br />
22
hydrolysis followed by chemical reaction was used in the analysis of PC (Bouhsain et al.,<br />
1996).<br />
Usually it not possible to determined the PC by both batch and FIA modesin direct US<br />
spectrophotomtery in the presence of compounds that were often found along with it, due<br />
to the interference caused by them. To solve this problem occurred from the non-specific<br />
absorption in this spectral region, derivative reactions have often been used in order to<br />
give colored compounds (Ayora Canada, 2000; Murfin, & Wragg, 1972; Hassan et al.,<br />
1981).<br />
An additional optical determinative technique such as spectrofluorimetry more sensitive,<br />
also needs the use of derivative reactions (Ayora, 2000; Vilchez et al., 1995), because<br />
paracetamol was not an intrinsic fluorophor and, in any case, the determination will be<br />
quicker and cheaper than that obtained by spectrofluorimetry if direct UV<br />
spectrophotometry is used.<br />
Pereira et al., 1998, proposed a method based on the on-line microwave-assisted alkaline<br />
hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid to salicylic acid that reacts with Fe (III) to form a<br />
complex that absorbs at 525 nm. The precision for ten successive measurements of 200<br />
μg/ml acetylsalicylic acid presented a relative standard deviation of 0.40%. The detection<br />
limit was 4.0 μg/ml and recoveries of 99.1–101.0% were obtained for acetylsalicylic acid.<br />
Another approach described by Criado, et al., 2000, for the analysis of PC and its major<br />
metabolites using fully automated screening system in human urine samples. The<br />
detection limit reached, 0.1 mg ml -1 .The proposed method is based on direct acid<br />
23
microwave assisted hydrolysis of the drug to p-aminophenol after that the reaction with<br />
o-cresol in alkaline medium.<br />
The benefit of derivative spectroscopy has reported by Bermejo et al., 1991, for the<br />
simultaneous determination and identification of PC and plasma salicylate using second<br />
order derivative spectra after a normal extraction process (Jelena, et al., 2003). Damiani<br />
et al., 1995, also reported the applications of the first derivative spectrophotometric<br />
technique for the analysis of PC in blood serum.<br />
Ragno et al., 2004, have reported that the UV analysis of a multicomponent mixture<br />
contains tripelenamine, paracetamol, salicylamide and caffeine using partial least-squares<br />
regression (PLS) and principal component regression (PCR). The PCR and PLS models<br />
were compared and their predictive performance was inferred by a successful application<br />
to the assays of synthetic mixtures and pharmaceutical formulations (Ragno, 2004).<br />
Knochen et al., 2003 setted a extremely precise and sensitive FI method depends on the<br />
nitration of paracetamol with sodium nitrite. The method was useful to the determination<br />
of PC in oral solutions and tablets.<br />
In view of reality that a luminol based CL system is applicable due to permanganate is an<br />
oxidant and in a basic medium the oxidation of paracetamol can be done<br />
(Easwaramoorthy, 2001; Seitz & Crit., 1981; Martinez & Gomez-Benito, 1990; Vilchez<br />
et al., 1995).<br />
A novel spectrophotometric method has developed by Afshari, et al., 2001, for rapid<br />
quantification of acetaminophen in serum. Free unconjugated acetaminophen is separated<br />
24
from other endogenous interferents by extracting the drug into ethyl acetate and<br />
hydrolysis to p-aminophenol by treatment with acid and heat. The proposed method is<br />
suitable for screening of drug overdose in an emergency situation with a linearity range<br />
from 25 to 600 µgml −1 .<br />
2.4. Chromatographic Methods<br />
There were various methods has been reported for the quantification of paracetamol in<br />
biological fluids as well in pharmaceuticals mainly, liquid chromatography coupled with<br />
mass spectrometry (Lohmann & Karst., 2006; Lou et al., 2010), high performance liquid<br />
chromatography (HPLC) (Šatínský et al., 2004; Goicoechea et al., 1995; Bari et al.,<br />
1998), gas chromatography (Santos et al., 2007), and Gas Chromatography/ Mass<br />
Spectrometry (El Haj et al., 1999).<br />
However, all these process involve derivatisation or e extraction procedures. Urinary<br />
screening of paracetamol was generally carried out by using acids (Bosch, 2006; Ray et<br />
al., 1987; Davey & Naidoo, 1993) or enzymatic (Hammond et al., 1984; Edwardson et<br />
al., 1989; Dasgupta & Kinnaman, 1993). The presented methods for the determination of<br />
PC in biological fluids (urine, blood, plasma) largely use chromatographic technique<br />
(HPLC and GC) (Wong et al., 1976; Lo and Bye, 1979; Ameer et al., 1981; Al-Obaidy et<br />
al., 1995; Lau and Critchley, 1994; Goicoechea et al., 1995), and other chromatographic<br />
methods. Plasma proteins are precipitated by a sulfotungstic acid reagent, and the<br />
supernatant liquid was mixed with pyridine containing the internal standard, and<br />
determined by gas chromatography. No interference was found, while the method was<br />
suitable for 1x10 -4 M levels of paracetamol in plasma (Pegon & Vallon, 1981).<br />
25
Evans et al., 1991, determined salicylic acid in serum samples using liquid<br />
chromatography, with amperometric detection. The serum extracts was found to be 0.06<br />
mol dm –3 acetate buffer in 8% methanol (pH 5.0). The average recovery from serum was<br />
found to be 60% with a relative standard deviation of 5.8%.<br />
A easy and fast HPLC method by phenacetin as internal standard for simultaneous<br />
determination of chlorphenamine maleate, caffeine and acetaminophen in the product<br />
compound PC and chlorphenamine maleate granules (Sun et al., 2006). The accuracy,<br />
precision and linearity of the method were satisfactory for the analyzed drugs.<br />
The application of the ratio spectra derivative spectrophotometry and HPLC has been by<br />
(Erk et al., 2001) for the direct analysis of PC and methocarbamol jointly in<br />
pharmaceutical tablets. Erdal et al., 2001, developed the HPLC based first derivative ratio<br />
amplitudes method for determination of paracetamol, caffeine and propyphenazon in<br />
ternary mixtures and tablets, the amounts of caffeine and paracetamol in the ternary<br />
mixture were determined using propyphenazon as a divisor.<br />
A chromatographic method (HPLC) for the analysis of 4-aminophenol and major<br />
adulteration of paracetamol has reported by Wyszecka-Kaszuba et al., 2003. The method<br />
was sensitive up to 4 ng ml -1 and 1 ng ml -1 in capsules and tablets respectively. The<br />
proposed method was effectively useful for the determination of commercially available<br />
drugs.<br />
26
2.5. Other Techniques<br />
In addition to above techniques there are several of analytical methods existing for the<br />
analysis of PC in various types of samples. These include colorimetric (Knochen et al.,<br />
2003), capillary electrophoresis (Chu et al., 2008, Heitmeier et al., 1999), micellar liquid<br />
chromatography (Love et al., 1985), and many others.<br />
Due to the hydrolysis of PC to 4-Aminophenol, it produced a colored compound with the<br />
suitable reactions, they are time-consuming, however these kind of produres are not<br />
enough convenient for PC determination in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical preparation. Flow-injection<br />
(FI ) with chemiluminescense method was therefore sought to serve this purpose.<br />
Chemiluminescence methods are regarded as sensitive and selective having various<br />
advantages for pharmaceutical formulations (Townshend, 1990; Robards & Worsfold,<br />
1992; Hindson & Barnett, 2001). The analysis of PC in biological fluids by using FI with<br />
chemiluminescence based on the oxidation of paracetamol with cerium (IV) were also<br />
reported (Koukli et al., 1989; Easwaramoorthy, 2001).<br />
2.6. Quantification of Paracetamol in Biological Samples and<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>armaceuticals<br />
Several analytical methodologies have been proposed for the determination of<br />
paracetamol in pharmaceutical formulations and biological samples (Bosch et al., 2006,<br />
Fanjul-Bolado et al., 2009). Clinical (blood and urine) determination of PC formulations<br />
using urinary excretion data has been well documented (Goyal, 2006; Welch & Conney,<br />
27
1965; Wong et al., 1976; Mattok et al., 1971; Sotiropoulus et al., 1981; Vila-Jato et al.,<br />
1986; DomÃnguez et al., 2000; Su and Cheng, 2010).<br />
The combination of mefenamic acid and paracetamol was described for the simultaneous<br />
determination by (Dinç et al., 2002).<br />
Criado et al., 2000, reported the method for the analysis of PC which was further diluted<br />
and continually hydrolyzed in an alkaline medium by spectroscopic method. The average<br />
R.S.D. of 2.4% shows the good validity of the method.<br />
For the first time, a multiparameter responding flow-through system with solid phase<br />
detection (a multiparameter optosensor) was described for the Simultaneous<br />
determination of a mixture of three active principles (caffeine, paracetamol and<br />
propyphenazone) using univariate calibration by UV spectrophotometric coupled with a<br />
multiparameter optosensor detector. The application of the detector successfully<br />
determined the analyte in commercial pharmaceuticals (DomÃnguez et al., 2000).<br />
Jelena et al., 2003, reported a method to facilitate the direct and simple determination of<br />
total paracetamol in urine by UV at the wavelength range 220–400nm.<br />
The selective and simple spectrofluorimetrical method has been designed by de los et al.,<br />
2005, for paracetamol determination in tablets.<br />
Altair et al., 2005 demonstrated a rapid and simple method for direct analysis of<br />
paracetamol in the solid state pharmaceutical formulations by fluorescence. Results were<br />
28
compared with those obtained by the BP recommended method at the 95% confidence<br />
level.<br />
The FI analysis of PC was setted, based on its inhibitory effect on a luminol-<br />
permanganate chemiluminescence system (Easwaramoorthy, 2001). The paracetamol<br />
contents were analyzed in locally available pharmaceuticals. The recovery obtained was<br />
in the range of 98.2–104.4%. The viability of the method was confirmed on actual<br />
samples (Easwaramoorthy et al., 2001).<br />
Ruengsitagoon et al., 2006 developed a simple chemiluminometric method for the<br />
determination of paracetamol in pharmaceutical formulations using FI based on the CL<br />
produced by the reduction of tris (2,2-bipyridyl) ruthenium(III) (Ruengsitagoon, 2006).<br />
Pedrosa et al., 2006, reported FIA method for the analysis of PC in pharmaceutical<br />
Formulation with a modified self-assembled monolayer (SAM) gold electrode with a of<br />
3-mercaptopropionic acid. Fifteen days lifetime of the modified electrode was found.<br />
Obtained results of amperometric proposed method will found comparable with<br />
spectrophotomtery.<br />
FIA with amperometric detection has been employed by Felix et al., 2007, for<br />
quantification of paracetamol using a carbon film resistor electrode. This sensor exhibited<br />
sharp and reproducible current peaks for acetaminophen without chemical modification<br />
of its surface.<br />
Cervini et al., 2008, evaluated a bare graphite-polyurethane composite as an<br />
amperometric FI detector for the quantification of paracetamol in pharmaceuticals. The<br />
29
esults showed that graphite-polyurethane composite can be used as an amperometric<br />
detector for flow analysis in the proposed determination.<br />
Santos et al., 2008, reported a simple and fast approach for simultaneous determination in<br />
pharmaceutical formulations of ascorbic acid and PC using FI method with multiple pulse<br />
amperometric detection. In this method chemometric technique were also employed for<br />
the better achievement of the results.<br />
A novel type of modified glass carbon electrodes with the nickel magnetic nanoparticles<br />
was made-up to determine the electrochemical properties of N-acetyl-p-aminophenol.<br />
Differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) was used for the determination of ACOP in<br />
effervescent dosage samples (Wang et al., 2007).<br />
Safavi et al., 2008, investigated an easy electrochemical method for the simultaneous<br />
determination of p-aminophenol and paracetamol in drugs. The peak potentials (oxidation<br />
and reduction) in cyclic voltammetry for paracetamol on carbon ionic liquid electrode<br />
were significantly improved in contrast to the usual carbon paste electrode.<br />
Zhao et al., 2006 reported the application of the indirect determination of paracetamol by<br />
a capillary electrophoresis–chemiluminescence (CE–CL) detection based on its inhibitory<br />
effect on a luminol-potassium hexacyanoferrate (III).<br />
Santhosh et al., 2009, determined the concentration of paracetamol in human blood<br />
plasma and commercial drugs by modification of Au electrode with tetraoctylammonium<br />
bromide stabilized gold nanoparticles attached to 1,6-hexanedithiol. (ATR)-FT-IR were<br />
use to confirmed the modified Au surface.<br />
30
Recently Lou Hong-gang et al., 2010, developed a highly sensitive and simple LC–<br />
MS/MS method after one-step precipitation for the simultaneous determination of<br />
pseudoephedrine, paracetamol, chlorpheniramine and dextrophan,, in human plasma<br />
using diphenhydramine as internal standard. The method was successfully validated for<br />
the determination of pharmaceutical formulation.<br />
2.7. Quantification of Aspirin in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and Biological Samples<br />
Aspirin was begin famous in the late 1890s and has been deal with range of inflammatory<br />
conditions (Supalkova et al., 2006). Many folk remedies used since pre-historic times<br />
have depended upon salicylates for their effect. 100 years ago aspirin was prepared from<br />
acetic and salicylic acids. It was the first drug to be synthesized and its formulation is<br />
regarded as the base of the current pharmaceutical industry.<br />
Commonly, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is indirectly determined after its conversion to<br />
salicylic acid (SA) and acetic acid by alkaline hydrolysis according to a British<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeia method, (British <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeia, 1980). Another reference method for the<br />
determination of salicylic acid was the spectrophotometric method based on the Trinder<br />
reaction, (Trinder, 1954).<br />
The SA was the most important metabolite of the ASA, which obtained by the hydrolysis.<br />
A large number of analytical approaches such as potentiometry (Kubota et al., 1999),<br />
spectrophotometry (Sena et al., 2000; Merckle & Kovar 1998; Loh et al., 2005; Vidal et<br />
al., 2002; Ruiz- medina et al., 2001), amperometry (Rover et al., 2000; Rover et al.,<br />
1998; Pasekova et al., 2001), chromatography (Nogowska et al., 1999), UV detection<br />
31
(Glombitza & Schmidt, 1994; Matias et al., 2004) and fluorescence (Martos et al., 2001),<br />
spectrofluorimetry (Criado et al., 2000; Arancibia et al., 2002; Moreira et al., 2004),<br />
methods have been also expressed for the analysis of ASA and SA in pharmaceutical<br />
formulation. Conversely it seems that they are not commonly used, maybe due the<br />
tedious and difficult sample preparations, usually liquid chromatographic methods were<br />
used (Pirola et al., 1998; Franeta et al., 2002; Šatínský et al., 2004; Stolker et al., 2004).<br />
Some time atomic absorption spectroscopic methods were also used but such methods are<br />
expensive and need extraction procedures. However ion selective electrode showing high<br />
specificity, good detection limit and comparably cheapest (Pasekova et al., 2001). Some<br />
other electrode has been also used for the determination aspirin such as nickel oxide-<br />
modified nickel electrode in alkaline solution (Kowal et al., 1997; Jafarian et al., 2003;<br />
Yousef Elahi et al., 2006; Majdi et al., 2007), and glassy carbon electrode (Houshmand et<br />
al., 2008). A number of flow injection spectrophotometric methods were also use on-line<br />
hydrolysis (Koupparis & Anagnostopoulou, 1988; Quintino et al., 2002; Catarino et al.,<br />
2003; Quintino et al., 2004, Garrido et al., 2000; Rover et al., 1998).<br />
Many developed methods has shows benefit regarding this containing some limitation<br />
also for the particular demand of analysis. In contrast with methods, electrochemical<br />
sensors are selective option for electroactive species because of high sensitivity and<br />
economical (Prasek et al., 2006, Babula et al., 2006).<br />
Supalkova et al., 2006, developed the method for indirect determination of acetylsalicylic<br />
acid in pharmaceutical drug. Electrochemical sensor for acetylsalicylic detection was also<br />
32
suggested. SWV using both CPE and graphite pencil as working electrode was<br />
successfully applied for determination of ASA.<br />
Majdi et al., 2007 and Houshmand et al., 2008, studied the electrocatalytic oxidation of<br />
aspirin on a nickel oxide-modified nickel electrode and nanoparticles of cobalt hydroxide<br />
electro-deposited on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode respectively in alkaline<br />
solution by chronoamperometry, cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance<br />
spectroscopy techniques as well as steady-state polarization measurements. The<br />
investigative facility helped for the determination of aspirin by using of modified<br />
electrodes. The method was proven to be valid for analyzing these drugs in urine samples<br />
(Houshmand et al., 2008).<br />
López-Cueto et al., 2002, proposed that when ASA was added to a bromine solution,<br />
slow decompose of the bromine concentration occurs, while hydrolysis of aspirin yields<br />
SA slowly, and bromine reacts quickly with salicylic acid. This behavior can be utilized<br />
to develop kinetic methods for resolution of mixtures of SA and PC.<br />
Matias et al., 2004, described the quantitative reflectance spot test procedure for the<br />
analysis of acetylsalicylic acid in pharmaceutical formulations. In this method the<br />
reaction of SA were carried out by the hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid with Fe (III)<br />
forming a deep blue-violet complex. Drugs having acetylsalicylic acid can be easily<br />
determined by the suggested method without any separation.<br />
Šatínský et al., 2004 reported the simultaneous determination of paracetamol, caffeine,<br />
acetylsalicylic acid, and internal standard benzoic acid on a novel reversed-phase<br />
33
sequential injection chromatography technique with UV detection. The analysis time was<br />
about 6 min. The method was found to be applicable for the routine analysis of the active<br />
compounds paracetamol, caffeine, and acetylsalicylic acid in pharmaceutical tablets.<br />
A simple and rapid analytical procedure was proposed by Sena & Poppi 2004, for<br />
simultaneous determination of caffeine paracetamol and acetylsalicylic acid by UV<br />
spectrophotometric method using multivariate calibration and measurements at 210–300<br />
nm.<br />
The on-line microwave assisted alkaline hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid has been<br />
developed by Pereira et al., 1998, where the hydrolysis product (salicylic acid) reacts<br />
with iron (III) to form a complex that absorbs at 525 nm. The method was applied to the<br />
determination of the drug in tablets.<br />
Tsikas et al., 1998, described gas chromatographic–tandem mass spectrometric method<br />
for the accurate analysis of ASA in human plasma after a only low-dose oral<br />
administration of 2 guaimesal or aspirin, an acetylsalicylic acid releasing pro drug.<br />
Hansen et al, 1998, studied the separation three metabolites such as salicyluric, and<br />
gentisic acid of acetylsalicylic acid in a non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis system<br />
with reversed electro osmotic flow.<br />
Amperometric biosensor for the salicylate determination in blood serum has been<br />
described by Rover et al., 2000.<br />
34
The quantification and separation of the anti-nerve agent pyridostgmine bromide, the<br />
analgesic drugs ASA and acetaminophen, and the stimulant caffeine in rat plasma and<br />
urine has been reported by Abu-Qare et al., 2001. The resulting chromatograms showed<br />
no interfering peaks from endogenous plasma or urine components.<br />
2.8. Quantification of Diclofenac Sodium in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and<br />
Biological Samples<br />
Different analytical methods have been employed for the quantification of diclofenic<br />
sodium (DS), such as spectrophotometry (Matin et al., 2005), fluorimetry (Aranciba et<br />
al., 2000), FT-Raman spectroscopy (Mazurek & Szostak, 2006; 2008), potentiometry<br />
(Pimenta et al., 2002), chromatography (Lala et al. 2002), voltammetry (Yang et al.,<br />
2008) and polarography (Xu et al. 2004). Most of these methods face certain problems<br />
such as the use of additional reagents, complex formation, long time and hazardous<br />
matrices.<br />
A method has been devised by Carreira et al., 1995, for the analysis of diclofenac sodium<br />
in bulk using Eu 3+ ions as the Fluorescent probe. The method was developed around the<br />
hypersensitive property of the transitions of the fluorescent probe ion at 616 nm.<br />
Fernandez de Coardova et al., 1998, have reported spectrophotometric method which was<br />
a sensitive, easy and very selective for the quantification of diclofenac sodium in<br />
authentic pharmaceutical drugs.<br />
Gonzalez et al., 1999, developed a method for the simultaneous determination of<br />
diclofenac, betamethasone, and cyanocobalamin (Vitamin B12), by HPLC. Linearity,<br />
interday precision and accuracy for each active ingredient were analyzed.<br />
35
Klimes et al., 2001, have reported the HPLC methodology to select a suitable acceptor<br />
medium for permeation experiments and also determined the release of diclofenac and its<br />
in vitro permeation through the human skin.<br />
Lala et al., 2002, has been developed the method using high performance thin layer<br />
chromatographic for the determination of diclofenac sodium from serum. Standard<br />
diclofenac sodium was spotted on silica gel precoated plates using the mobile phase<br />
toluene:acetone:glacial acetic acid.<br />
Tubino & Rafael, 2006, reported a method for quantification diclofenac in<br />
pharmaceutical drugs by diffuse reflectance. The finding results were compared with the<br />
HPLC procedure recommended by the USP.<br />
Rodriguez et al., 2007, investigated a tubular bismuth film electrode, installed as part of a<br />
multisyringe FI system and utilized it as an amperometric detector for analysis of<br />
diclofenac sodium in drugs samples.<br />
Payán et al., 2009, described an extraction method using a polypropylene membrane<br />
supporting dihexyl ether for the analysis of some analgesic formulations in human urine<br />
samples by HPLC using a monolithic silica column such as ibuprofen, salicylic acid and<br />
diclofenac.<br />
Blanco-López et al., 2003, have developed a method for the determination of diclofenic<br />
sodium by voltammetric sensor based on the molecular recognition of the analyte by<br />
36
molecularly imprinted methacrylate ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate co-polymers. The best<br />
results were obtained in 0.025 M citrate solution (pH 6) containing 10% of acetonitrile.<br />
Fernández-Llano et al., 2007, reported the molecularly imprinted polymer for diclofenac,<br />
prepared thermal polymerization over silica beads using 2-(dimethylamino) ethyl-<br />
methacrylate as functional monomer. A selective solid-phase extraction of the drug from<br />
urine followed by its quantification by ADPV.<br />
Goyal et al., 2010, proposed the voltammetric determination of diclofenac using SWV at<br />
edge plane pyrolytic graphite (EPPG) sensor from real urine samples. Jin & Zhang, 2000<br />
have developed the for the detection of diclofenic sodium in urine sample by using<br />
capillary zone electrophoresis using carbon fiber microelectrode, at a constant potential.<br />
Xu et al., 2004 have investigated the polarographic response characteristics of diclofenac<br />
sodium in 0.25M HAc-NaAc (pH 5.0) supporting electrolyte in the absence and the<br />
presence of dissolved oxygen.<br />
Mazurek & Szostak, 2006, have studied the FT-Raman quantification of minophylline<br />
and diclofenac sodium. The efficiency of many spectra treatment protcols including<br />
multivariate partial least squares and classical univariate intensity ratio and principal<br />
component regression (PCR) methods was compared.<br />
Mazurek & Szostak, 2008, have reported the method for quantitative determination of<br />
diclofenac sodium in capsules and tablets by FT-Raman. PLS, PCR counter-propagation<br />
artificial neural networks (CP-ANN) strategies were also emlyed in this method for its<br />
fastness and convenient to the other pharmacopoeial methods. Wang et al., 2009, have<br />
37
investigated a method for quantitative analysis of diclofenac sodium powder on the basis<br />
of NIR spectroscopy.<br />
Hajjizadeh et al., 2007, have developed a sensitive and simple amperometric procedure<br />
for the analysis of mefenamic acid, diclofenac and indomethacin in bulk form and for the<br />
direct assay of tablets, using the NHMN electrode. The electrocatalytic oxidation of these<br />
drugs was examined on a nickel hydroxide-modified nickel electrode in alkaline solution.<br />
Another sensitive, simple, and time-saving amperometric approach by Heli et al., 2009,<br />
have investigated based on the electro-oxidation of several NSAIDs such as mefenamic<br />
acid, diclofenac and indomethacin on nanoparticles of Ni–curcumin-complex-modified<br />
glassy carbon electrode in alkaline solution. Atomic force microscopy and scanning<br />
electron microscopy were used for surface studies.<br />
Yilmaz, 2010, developed a procedure based on GC-MS for the determination of<br />
diclofenac in human plasma. This assay was successfully applied in Turkey to healthy<br />
volunteers after an oral administration of 50 mg diclofenac.<br />
García et al., 1998, have reported a rapid FI spectrophotometric method for the analysis<br />
of diclofenac sodium in pharmaceuticals and urine samples.<br />
Pimenta et al., 2002, have reported the two autonomous methods for the analysis of<br />
diclofenac simultaneously applied in an automated analytical system, based on the<br />
concept of sequential injection determination, providing real-time assessment of results<br />
quality. ISE based on cyclodextrin were used for the potentiometric detection.<br />
38
Pérez-Ruiz et al., 1997 reported the spectrophotometric determination the trace quantity<br />
of diclofenic were determined by liquid–liquid extraction. Furthermore New, rapid and<br />
accurate spectrophotometric method for the analysis of diclofenac sodium in drugs<br />
sample which is based the reaction of nitric acid (Conc. at 63% w/v) proposed by Matin<br />
et al., 2005.<br />
2.9. Quantification of Ibuprofen in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical and Biological<br />
Samples<br />
A rapid quantitative analysis of ibuprofen in plasma of human blood was carried by<br />
Jonkman et al., 1985, using a SFE on “Baker” C-18 disposable extraction column. The<br />
proposed method was a simple and sensitive.<br />
Stefan and Heitmeier & Blaschke, 1999, have investigated reliable screening method that<br />
allows determination of the drugs its metabolites in human urine after oral administration<br />
(Heitmeier, 1999).<br />
Damiani et al., 2001, have described the determination of ibuprofen in pharmaceutical<br />
creams, tablets and syrups without any interference of the excipients by<br />
spectrofluorimetric method. It involved emission at 288 nm and excitation at 263 nm. The<br />
linear range was 2–73 mgL −1 .<br />
Palabiyik et al., 2004, described the spectrophotometric methods for the simultaneous<br />
determination of pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and ibuprofen in their combination. The<br />
range 100–1300 µg ml −1 for pseudoephedrine hydrochlorides and 300–1300 µg ml −1 was<br />
found for ibuprofen. Hamoudová et al., 2006, have illustrated that the capillary zone<br />
electrophoresis with by using spectrophotometric for the determination of flurbiprofen<br />
39
and ibuprofen. A fused silica capillary with UV detection was used for separation which<br />
carried out at 232 nm. The method was successfully validated for the analysis of 10<br />
commercially available tablets, syrup, gel and cream. Hassan, 2008, presented three<br />
methods for simultaneous analysis of PC and ibuprofen without any earlier separation. 1 st<br />
derivative UV with zero-crossing measurement was the first method. Second depends on<br />
1 st derivative of the ratio-spectra by measurements. 3 rd method was depends on<br />
multivariate spectrophotometric calibration for the simultaneously analysis of<br />
components.<br />
Costi et al., 2008, have proposed the practically and quantitative solvent-free solid-phase<br />
extraction (SPE) of ibuprofen and naproxen from sewage samples. Khoshayand et al.,<br />
2008, have reported the simultaneous determination of caffeine paracetamol and<br />
ibuprofen in pharmaceuticals by chemometric approaches using UV spectrophotometry.<br />
Rapid, simple and accurate economical spectrophotometric method for simultaneous<br />
determination of PC and ibuprofen in combined soft gelatin capsule dosage form has<br />
been developed using two wavelengths at 224 and 248 nm simultaneously (Riddhi et al.,<br />
2010).<br />
Sochor et al., 1995, described the HPLC method for the analysis of ibuprofen in plasma<br />
and isolated erythrocytes. C-18 column were for the Practical and methanol-water<br />
(220:100, v/v) were used as mobile phase.<br />
40
A HP-TLC method for quantitative determination of ibuprofen in plasma was explained<br />
(Save et al., 1997). The limit of detection 50 ng was found for ibuprofen from human<br />
plasma.<br />
Kang et al., 1998, studied the quantitative aspects of HPLC with a column-switching<br />
system and CE for the determination of ibuprofen in plasma. Farrar et al., 2002,<br />
developed a fast and easy method of analysis the ibuprofen in small volumes of human<br />
plasma (50 µl) by HPLC. The calibration curve was linear and limit of quantitation of<br />
1.56 µg/ml.<br />
De Oliveira et al., 2005, described an easy, sensitive and fast off-line solid-phase<br />
microextraction process coupled with HPLC for the stereoselective analysis of the major<br />
metabolites of ibuprofen in human urine samples.<br />
Agatonovic-Kustrin et al., 2000, studied the enantiomeric purity of ibuprofen in a simple<br />
manner by diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy with<br />
artificial neural networks (ANNs) methodology. Russeau et al., 2009, have used the<br />
ATR-FTIR and target factor analysis to explore the pharmaceutical gel containing<br />
ibuprofen in human skin. Results revealed that the data were effectively correlated<br />
between reference spectra of the components and factors from the data.<br />
Hergert & Escandar, 2003, have studied the complexation of ibuprofen in ß-cyclodextrin<br />
using spectrofluorimetry at both acid and alkaline pH successfully.<br />
Valderrama & Poppi, 2010, reported the spectrofluorimetric second order standard<br />
addition method for the determination of ibuprofen in human plasma and urine. The<br />
methodology was based on chiral recognition of ibuprofen by formation of complex with<br />
41
a β-cyclodextrin, in the presence of 1- butanol. The obtained results were in the molar<br />
fraction range from 50 to 80% of ibuprofen, providing absolute errors lowers than 4.0%<br />
for plasma and urine. Glówka, & Karazniewicz, 2005, developed a method for the<br />
quantitative determination of ibuprofen in biological matrices, human serum and urine<br />
using direct and stereospecific capillary zone electrophoresis (CZE). Bauza et al., 2001,<br />
used in situ chiral derivatisation to get diastereomeric amides of ibuprofen for their<br />
subsequent extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide. Urine sample containing<br />
ibuprofen were spiked to reveal the suitability of this method<br />
Sádecká et al., 2001, quantified ibuprofen and naproxen in tablets by capillary<br />
isotachophoresis. Linearity was from 40.0 to 200.0 mg L −1 of ibuprofen, with a<br />
coefficient of determination of 0.999.<br />
Tapan et al., 2010, have developed simple reproducible simultaneous equation method,<br />
requiring no prior separation, for the assessment of PC and ibuprofen in combined dosage<br />
form. Ibuprofen has absorbance maxima at 220 nm and paracetamol at 248.40 nm using<br />
ethanol as solvent. The method obeys Beer’s Law in concentration ranges employed for<br />
the estimation.<br />
Recently Issa et al., 2010, reported a simple, rapid and accurate method for the<br />
simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of ibuprofen and paracetamol in two<br />
components mixture and Cetofen tablets. Calibration graphs were linear in the range 2–32<br />
µg ml −1 (LOD 0.53 µg ml −1 ) and 2–24 µg ml −1 (LOD 0.57 µg ml −1 ) ibuprofen and<br />
paracetamol respectively.<br />
42
EXPERIMENTAL<br />
3.1. Material and Methods for Paracetamol using UV-Visible<br />
Spectrophotometry<br />
3.1.1. Reagents and Chemicals<br />
Chapter-03<br />
Acetonitrile, chloroform, 2-propanol, hydrochloric acid, ammonia, sodium hydroxide,<br />
paracetamol (PC), acetyl salicylic acid, ibuprofen, caffeine, diclofenic sodium, with<br />
>99% purity were obtained from Merck (Germany). Ascorbic acid, sodium sulfide,<br />
ammonium iron (III) sulfate, sulfuric acid and ethanol were from Fluka Chemicals.<br />
Methanol was obtained from a local sugar industry and triply distilled before use.<br />
Doubly distilled water was used throughout for final washings and preparations of all<br />
aqueous solutions. Aqueous PC stock solution was prepared by warming the solution<br />
for 10–20 min at a boiling water bath until complete dissolution of the analyte. The<br />
solution was then cooled to room temperature and made up with doubly distilled<br />
water.<br />
3.1.2. Instruments and Apparatus<br />
Lambda 2 UV/visible spectrometer of Perkin-Elmer company was used for the effect<br />
of all parameters and analysis of samples by recording the respective absorbance<br />
value at definite wavelength. FTIR spectra of the respective reagents and compounds<br />
were recorded by means of a Nicolet Avatar Model 330 FTIR of Thermo Electron<br />
Corporation. Temperature adjustment during experiments was carried out with<br />
controlled temperature Water Bath, Model, GMBH D-7633, Julabo HC5, Germany in<br />
which a netted tray was fitted for test tube holding in vertical position.<br />
43
3.1.3. Procedure for Determining PC<br />
PC was determined in dilute standard solution after taking it in the specific 1 cm<br />
quartz cell against a blank (doubly distilled water) at a λmax value of 243 nm by<br />
recording the respective signal or absorbance value using a controlled unit. A<br />
calibration range was set for PC by recording the spectra of various standard<br />
solutions. The locally available tablets containing PC were also analyzed by the same<br />
procedure after dissolution of five replicate portions (each tablet containing 0.01<br />
g/100 mL water) randomly selected from weighed three powdered tablets of each<br />
manufacturer company in the similar manner as accurate for preparing standard PC<br />
stock solution. During temperature related experiments, the temperature of PC and<br />
blank solutions were first regularized with controlled temperature water bath and then<br />
transferred to quartz cells very smartly but carefully for quick UV analysis. After<br />
several experiments it was found that there was a variation of ±1 ◦C temperature. The<br />
dilute samples analyzed were evaluated for their PC contents after fitting their average<br />
of replicate spectra in calibration plot and multiplying the result with dilution factor.<br />
3.1.4. Analysis of PC in Urine Samples<br />
Collection of urine samples from four volunteers was conducted in the same way as<br />
described elsewhere [Jelena et al., 2003]. Each individual was instructed not to use<br />
any medication before two weeks of urine collection. The urine samples were then<br />
collected in thoroughly washed and clean plastic bottles in the morning time from full<br />
bladder without any dose of PC. After this, each individual was instructed to eat the<br />
same diet he has used yesterday. Each of them was administered with a PC tablet of a<br />
specific brand containing 500 mg PC after 12 h of previous urine collection. The next<br />
day the urine samples were collected after 12 h in the same way as true for samples<br />
without PC. After same proper dilutions, the samples were processed for UV<br />
44
spectrophotometric determination of PC with the procedure described earlier by<br />
taking the diluted sample without PC as blank and PC containing as the actual sample.<br />
The difference gave the PC contents in the urine sample which was converted to<br />
actual value after adjusting for dilution factor.<br />
3.2. Material and Methods for Diclofenac Sodium using UV-Visible<br />
Spectrophotometry<br />
3.2.1 Apparatus<br />
The apparatus were used as same describe in section 3.1.2.<br />
3.2.2. Washing of Glassware<br />
All glassware was washed by soaking in 3 M HNO3 overnight followed by washing<br />
with detergent water. It was then thoroughly washed with tap water and finally rinsed<br />
at least 3 times with doubly distilled water. The glassware was then dried in an oven<br />
at 110 0 C.<br />
3.2.3. Reagents and Solutions<br />
All the reagents used in this study were of analytical grade ultra pure quality from<br />
Merck, Fluka and BDH, etc. Diclofenac sodium (DS) and other pharmaceutical<br />
standards were provided by Birds Chemotec Karachi, Pakistan. The identity of<br />
pharmaceutical standards was checked by Fourier Transform Infrared spectra and<br />
comparing these with the relevant data found in literature. Stock standard solution<br />
(w/v) of diclofenac sodium (1 mgmL -1 ) was prepared in 100 mL calibrated volumetric<br />
flask and diluted to the mark with doubly distilled water. Dilute working standards<br />
were prepared from time to time as per requirement. Solutions of other reagents were<br />
also prepared in doubly distilled water in the desired concentration.<br />
45
3.2.4. Procedure for Determining DS in Tablets<br />
Four brands of tablets containing DS from different manufacturers were purchased<br />
from local market and analyzed by using the current method. Ten tablets from each<br />
brand were finely powdered and mixed. An amount equal to the average weight of<br />
one tablet was collected randomly, transferred to a 100 mL volumetric flask,<br />
dissolved and made up with doubly distilled water. Dilute solutions were made from<br />
each sample and analyzed by UV-Vis Spectrometer. The concentration of DS per<br />
tablet was calculated with the help of equation for linear calibration curve of DS and<br />
multiplying with relevant dilution factor.<br />
3.2.5. Procedure for DS in Serum and Urine Samples<br />
The blood and urine samples were collected before the intake of DS (blank) at day 1<br />
and after taking DS at day 2. The individuals were instructed not to use any analgesics<br />
including DS one week before examination and use the same common diet at day 1<br />
and day 2. The DS was administered just after the collection of blank urine samples.<br />
The blood samples were collected after 2 hour of dosage while urine samples were<br />
collected after 12 hours of administration of 50 mg of tablet. Serum was obtained as<br />
supernatant from blank and DS containing clotted blood samples by centrifugation<br />
method. In order to freed the urine and serum sample from water insoluble impurities,<br />
1 mL of blank as well as DS containing sample were passed through a column DSC-<br />
18 (used in solid phase extraction), which was pre-washed with 2 mL of methanol.<br />
The recovered urine or serum sample was diluted to 10 mL with doubly distilled<br />
water and analyzed for DSF contents by UV-Visible spectrometer taking water as<br />
actual blank (reference) to record the spectra of blank and DS containing serum and<br />
urine samples. The difference of absorbance between blank and actual sample gave<br />
the concentration of DS after fitting the value in linear equation and multiplying the<br />
46
esult with dilution factor. This treatment was carried out due to the difficulty in<br />
finding out the absorbance in case of taking actual serum or urine sample as blank<br />
against DS containing serum or blood sample. Standard solution of DS was spiked to<br />
each serum or urine sample in order to confirm the peak of DS.<br />
3.3. Material and Methods for the Determination of Paracetamol using<br />
Differential Pulse Voltammetry<br />
3.3.1. Reagents and Solutions<br />
The stock solution of Paracetamol (N-acetyl-4-aminophenol, purity 98%, Aldrich,<br />
Germany) (c = 1×10 -3 mol.L -1 ) was prepared by means of dissolving 0.0076 g of the<br />
substance in 50 mL of de-ionized (DI) water. Further dilutions were prepared by<br />
required volume of the stock solution with DI water. All solutions were stored in the<br />
dark, at laboratory temperature and in glass vessels. Other chemicals such as boric<br />
acid, glacial acetic acid, phosphoric acid, sodium hydroxide, all % purity were<br />
purchased from Lachema Brno, Czech republic and potassium chloride was<br />
purchased from Lach-Ner, Czech republic. MilliQ plus system (Millipore, USA) was<br />
used for deionized water. The conductive carbon ink solution was arranged by<br />
combination 0.01 g of polystyrene (expanded – packaging box, Merck, Germany),<br />
0.09 g of carbon powder (crystalline graphite 2 µm, CR 2 Maziva Tyn, Czech<br />
Republic) in 0.5 mL dichlorethane (purity 99.5%, Merck, Germany). The mixture was<br />
thoroughly homogenized by agitation.<br />
3.3.2. Apparatus<br />
Eco-Tribo Polarograph coupled with POLAR PRO software version 5.1 (Polaro-<br />
Sensors, Prague) was employed for all voltammetric measurements. The instrumental<br />
software joined under the operational system Microsoft Windows XP (Microsoft<br />
Corp.). All measurements were carried out in a three-electrode system. Silver/silver<br />
47
chloride reference electrode ETP CZ R00308 (1 mol.L -1 KCl, Monokrystaly Turnov,<br />
Czech republic), platinum wire as an auxiliary electrode ETP CZ P01406, and CFE<br />
(based on AgSAE, no. 2-05-19 from Eco-trend Plus, Czech Republic, disk diameter<br />
0.5 mm, covered by carbon ink film) as a working electrode were used.<br />
The optimized parameters such as scan rate 20 mV.s -1 , the pulse amplitude 50 mV,<br />
sampling time of 20 ms beginning at 80 ms after the onset of the pulse were used.<br />
Better reproducibility of voltammetric measurements at CFE was assured by a<br />
suitable electrochemical regeneration [Fischer et al., 2007] of CFE. Optimal results<br />
were obtained for pH 4 with electrochemical regeneration by the application of<br />
periodical switching every 0.1 s between potentials –400 mV (Ereg1) and 1300 mV<br />
(Ereg2) in the given measured solution for 30 s (150 cycles).<br />
3.3.3. Procedures<br />
The voltammetric measurements were carried out by taking appropriate amount (1 µL<br />
– 1000 µL). Paracetamol solution in water was added into a 10 mL volumetric flask,<br />
which was filled up to the mark with corresponding Britton-Robinson buffer and then<br />
transferred into an electrochemical cell. Oxygen was removed from measured<br />
solutions by purging with nitrogen for 5 minutes.<br />
Current of peak was measured from the straight-line connecting minima on both sides<br />
of the peak. Current of background electrolyte was subtracted from current of peak.<br />
The calibration curves were measured in triplicate and evaluated by the least squares<br />
linear regression method. Limit of determination (LOD) was calculated using a<br />
10S/slope ratio, where S is the standard deviation of the mean value for 12 analyte<br />
determinations at the concentration corresponding to the lowest peak on the<br />
48
appropriate calibration straight line according to IUPAC recommendations (Inczedy et<br />
al., 1998). All the measurements were carried out at laboratory temperature.<br />
Determination of Paracetamol in pharmaceutical samples was carried out by standard<br />
addition method. Given tablet was dissolved in 100 mL of deonized water and 100 µL<br />
of this solution was diluted by Britton-Robinson buffer (pH 4.0) up to 10 mL and used<br />
for voltammetric measurement, and standard additions of Paracetamol stock solution.<br />
For testing of the quantitative investigation of paracetamol in samples of human urine<br />
the method of calibration curve was used. Calibration curves and series of<br />
determination for analyzed drug in model solutions of human urine were determined.<br />
3.4. Material and Methods for the Analysis of Ibuprofen using FT-IR<br />
Spectroscopy<br />
3.4.1. Reagents and Samples<br />
The stock solution of Ibuprofen purity 99%, (Merck, Germany) (c = 1000 ppm) was<br />
prepared by means of dissolving 0.1 g of the substance in 100 mL of chloroform<br />
99.98 % purity (Fisher scientific UK limited). Further dilutions were prepared by<br />
required volume of the stock solution with chloroform. All solutions were stored in<br />
the dark, at laboratory temperature and in glass vessels with tight cover. The different<br />
pharmaceutical tablet samples containing ibuprofen as an active component were<br />
purchased from pharmacy unit of Hyderabad, Pakistan.<br />
3.4.2. FT-IR Spectral Measurements<br />
For the obtaining of infrared spectra of standard, tablet and urine samples, FTIR<br />
spectrometer (Thermo Nicolet 5700) was employed fitted with detachable liquid cell<br />
(KBr) and DTGS detector was attached. OMNIC software version 7.3 was used to<br />
control the instrument. The mid-IR spectral range from 4000 cm -1 to 400 cm −1 was<br />
49
selected, total 16 scans with the resolution of 4 cm −1 . A new background spectrum of<br />
chloroform was taken before recording the spectra of all sample and standard.<br />
3.4.3. FT-IR Calibration<br />
Ten standard of Ibuprofen ranging from 10 to 100 ppm in chloroform were prepared<br />
for biological fluids and pharmaceutical samples and the samples were quantitatively<br />
determined by using Turbo Quant (TQ) analyst software.<br />
The already recorded spectra by Omnic software of ibuprofen standards were opened<br />
in TQ analyst program for the selection of particular region of carboxylic peak (1807-<br />
1461 cm -1 ). Some peak parameters such as peak height, peak width for all Ibuprofen<br />
standards were selected and these were calculated by TQ software which makes the<br />
use of FI-IR as powerful analytical technique for both qualitative and quantitative<br />
analysis also obtained excellent calibration curve between actual and predicted value.<br />
3.4.4. Sample Preparation Procedure<br />
This method requires only grinding of tablet samples followed by dissolution in<br />
chloroform for FTIR measurement. After weighing the tablet samples were grinded to<br />
fine powder in mortar to minimize the particle size. Quantitative analyses of solutions<br />
of ibuprofen in chloroform were performed in a cell with KBr windows and variable<br />
optic pathway (Wilks). The KBr windows were scanned from 4000 cm -1 to 400 cm -1<br />
on Thermo Nicolet 5700-FTIR spectrometer.<br />
3.4.5. Collection and Preparation of Urine Samples<br />
Urine samples were collected from healthy volunteers. 2 ml of urine sample passed<br />
through a column DSC-18 (used in solid phase extraction), which was pre-washed<br />
with 2 ml of methanol. Then sample was washed with 5 ml of 5% methanol followed<br />
50
y 1 ml chloroform. After washing the urine sample was spiked with known<br />
concentration of ibuprofen.<br />
3.5. Material and Methods for Investigation of Aspirin using Voltammetry<br />
3.5.1. Reagents<br />
The stock solution of acetylsalicylic acid and salicylic acid (Aldrich Chem. Co.)<br />
(c = 1×10 -1 mol.L -1, c = 1×10 -3 mol.L -1 ) were prepared respectively in de-ionized (DI)<br />
water. Further dilutions were prepared by required volume of the stock solution with<br />
DI water. All solutions were stored in the dark, at laboratory temperature and in glass<br />
vessels. Other chemicals boric acid, glacial acetic acid, phosphoric acid, sodium<br />
hydroxide, all p.a. purity were supplied by Lachema Brno, Czech republic and<br />
potassium chloride was supplied by Lachner Tovarni Neratovice Czech republic.<br />
MilliQ plus system was used for deionized water. The conductive carbon ink solution<br />
was arranged by combination 0.01 g of polystyrene, 0.09 g of carbon powder<br />
(crystalline graphite 2 µm, CR 2 Maziva Týn, Czech Republic) in 0.5 mL<br />
dichloreathane (purity 99.5% Merck). The mixture was thoroughly homogenized by<br />
agitation.<br />
3.5.2. Apparatus<br />
Eco-Tribo Polarograph coupled with POLAR PRO software version 5.1 (Polaro-<br />
Sensors, Prague) was employed for all voltammetric measurements. The software<br />
connected with computer system Microsoft Windows XP (Microsoft Corp.) and P-<br />
LAB a.s. Stuart Block heater model no (SBH 130 DC) was used for the hydrolysis of<br />
Acetysalicylic acid.<br />
51
3.5.3. Voltammetric Procedure<br />
All measurements were carried out in a three-electrode system. Silver/silver chloride<br />
reference electrode ETP CZ R00308 (1 mol.L -1 KCl, Monokrystaly Turnov, Czech<br />
republic), platinum wire as an auxiliary electrode ETP CZ P01406, and CFE (based<br />
on AgSAE, disk diameter 0.5 mm, covered by carbon ink film) No. 2-05-19 as a<br />
working electrode were used. The optimized parameters including the pulse amplitude<br />
50 mV, pulse width 80 ms and scan rate 20 mV.s -1 were used.<br />
Better reproducibility of voltammetric measurements at CFE was assured with a<br />
proper electrochemical activation of CFE at 2200 for 120 seconds. The Optimum<br />
results were achieved by the application of electrochemical regeneration potential<br />
between same peak potential at 750 mV.<br />
3.5.4. Indirect Determination of ASA<br />
After hydrolysis of ASA give DPV signal on the surface of CFE, according to<br />
increasing pH and temperature of Britton-Robinson buffer. 1 mL ASA (900 µL of<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 12 and 100 µL of of ASA); (total concentration of ASA<br />
was 0.2-100 μmol -1 L) were hydrolyzed at 90 °C for 60 min and analyzed by DPV on<br />
the surface of CFE in the presence of 9ml Britton-Robinson buffer (pH= 2) up to total<br />
volume of 10 mL.<br />
3.5.5. Indirect Determination of ASA in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Drugs and Urine<br />
Samples by DPV at CFE<br />
The above-mentioned method for indirect determination of ASA has been applied for<br />
analysis of pharmaceutical drugs. The tablets were homogenized and given mass were<br />
dissolved in water. We took 40 µl of this solution, added 60 µl water and added, into<br />
it Britton-Robinson buffer (900 µl, pH 12) for 60 min at 90 °C. After that, the<br />
52
obtained extract (1 ml) was added to the 9 ml of supporting electrolyte (Britton-<br />
Robinson, pH 2) and analyzed by DPV at CFE.<br />
For checking of quantitative investigation of ASA in urine samples of human the<br />
method of calibration curve was used.<br />
53
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />
Chapter-04<br />
4.1. Simpler Spectrophotometric Assay of PC in Tablets and urine<br />
Samples<br />
Analysts do always try to process the analyte in a way which is suitable for its<br />
optimum analytical signal response. In case of PC determination by UV/visible<br />
spectrometry the standard or sample is hydrolyzed with alkali (Chunli and Baoxin,<br />
1995, Andres, et al., 2003) to convert it to p-aminophenol which is then reacted with a<br />
suitable ligand to get a signal at a specific wavelength. However, such treatment<br />
makes the process not only time consuming but costly as well. In view of the aim of<br />
the current study, the hydrolysis step was overcome by taking directly the photoactive<br />
properties of the PC in aqueous solution. Moreover, the process was made further<br />
economical and safe by avoiding the use of chemicals. Various optimization studies<br />
conducted during this work are presented below.<br />
4.1.1 Effect of Water Addition to PC (FTIR studies)<br />
Fig. 4.1.1. describes the behavior of PC after adding doubly distilled water. It is seen<br />
from the spectra that in case of original PC spectrum (A) the –OH and –NH stretching<br />
is dominant along with absorption by groups like amides. Increase in water addition<br />
(B) to (C) results in domination of –OH stretching over –NH stretching due to<br />
addition of more and more –OH ions from water to PC along with diminishing of<br />
spectra between 1700 to 800 cm −1 region. The spectra obtained at very low<br />
concentration of PC in aqueous solution are almost of the same shape as true for pure<br />
water. However, the FTIR spectra can be calibrated for higher concentration ranges as<br />
quoted previously by Mitsuko et al., 2002 who proposed calibration model for PC<br />
54
concentration at various temperature ranges based on the increment of spectral signals<br />
with increase in concentration of PC in water in the range of 1800–1100 cm −1 . Similar<br />
FTIR studies for PC in water at room temperature have also been conducted in<br />
another citation (Maiella, et al., 1998).<br />
Fig. 4.1.1 FTIR spectra of (A), pure PC (B), aqueous PC paste and (C) aqueous<br />
solution of 5 µgml -1 PC.<br />
In contrast to FTIR studies of water treated PC, the solid-state IR-LD spectral analysis<br />
of monoclinic and orthorhombic PC, polymorphs of aspirin and arginine-containing<br />
peptides have been described by (Ivanova 2005, Koleva, 2006 and Kolev, 2006),<br />
respectively. Another reference is the application of FTIR and Raman spectroscopic<br />
methods for identification and quantification of orthorhombic and monoclinic PC in<br />
powder mixes (Al-Zoubi, et al., 2002).<br />
4.1.2. Optimization of Time for Measurement and Stability of Analytical Signal<br />
Fig. 4.1.2. describes the effect of time on the absorbance value for a 5 µg ml -1 aqueous<br />
solution of PC during one hour duration at room temperature of 30 ± 1 0 C against a<br />
reagent (PC) blank.<br />
55
Absorbance<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60<br />
Time (minutes)<br />
Fig. 4.1.2. Dependence of absorbance of PC on time<br />
The effect of time on absorbance of 5 µgml −1 aqueous solution of PC during 1 h<br />
duration at room temperature of 30±1 ◦ C against a reagent (PC) blank was studied. It<br />
was observed that absorbance remained constant throughout the whole period and<br />
thus independent of time. Further observation showed that absorption of the<br />
mentioned PC solution was constant for 72 h while it showed a 2.94% decrease after<br />
96 h. It means that one can analyze PC in standard or sample at his own choice. So the<br />
analysis is very much easy to determine quickly with little energy consumption. Such<br />
constant absorbance vs time has also been demonstrated elsewhere (Jalil and Tsan-<br />
Zon, 2001). As another comparison to current study, a stability time of 10 min has<br />
been reported (Chunli and Baoxin, 1995), who used Fe +3 ions in the presence of S −2<br />
ions for formation of methylene blue-like dye after reaction with p-aminophenol (the<br />
hydrolysis product of PC).<br />
4.1.3. Effect of Temperature<br />
The effect of temperature on absorbance of 5 µgml -1 PC at 243 nm was checked out in<br />
the range of 5–50 ◦ C with 5 ◦ C intervals between two readings. It was seen that the<br />
temperature at lower (5–15 ◦ C) and higher (40–50 ◦ C) range showed some<br />
enhancement of absorbance which corresponds to a 2.94% increase as compared to<br />
medium (20–35 ◦ C) range.<br />
56
Absorbance<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50<br />
Temperature ( 0 C)<br />
Fig. 4.1.3. Effect of temperature on absorbance of PC<br />
The higher absorbance value at lower temperature may be due to the possibility of<br />
adsorption of PC molecules which could be condensed on the inner wall of quartz<br />
cell. The higher absorbance at higher temperature may be due to the possibility of<br />
evaporation of some water molecules which could make the PC solution concentrated<br />
and hence adding to absorbance value. However, room temperature (30±1 ◦C) was<br />
taken as optimum temperature to avoid the possibility of false analytical signal due to<br />
adsorption at lower or evaporation of water at higher temperature. A temperature<br />
range of 20–60 ◦C has also been described for evaluation of PC by spectrophotometry<br />
(Andres, et al., 2000). They have also chosen room temperature for PC determination<br />
as other temperature values had no effect on its determination.<br />
4.1.4. Effect of Polar Solvents<br />
The effect of addition of 0.01 ml of different solvents on the absorbance of a standard<br />
solution of 5 µgml −1 PC at other optimized conditions is outlined in Table 4.1.1. It is<br />
seen that the addition of aliphatic alcohols in minute quantity has no effect at all.<br />
57
Table 4.1.1. Effect of different polar solvents on absorbance of PC.<br />
Solvent Absorbance Effect (%)<br />
Methanol 0.34 0.00<br />
Ethanol 0.34 0.00<br />
2-propanol 0.34 0.00<br />
N-dimethyl formamide 0.32 -5.88<br />
Acetonitrile 0.32 -5.88<br />
Chloroform 0.35 +2.94<br />
It may be due to increased miscibility and structural similarity of these alcohols with<br />
water. In case of dimethyl formamide and acetonitrile, the negative effect may be due<br />
to greater structural differences of these solvents with water. In case of chloroform,<br />
the little bit higher absorbance value is because of increased concentration of PC in<br />
water due to immiscibility of former in the later. However, the effect of solvent on PC<br />
determination is rarely studied in literature but some authors (Marcelo and Ronei,<br />
2004) have used a 20:80 (v/v) ethanol/water as better solvent mixture for<br />
determination of PC, caffeine and acetyl salicylic acid.<br />
4.1.5. Interference by various Analgesic Drugs<br />
The interference of various analgesic drugs to PC in various proportions was checked<br />
to investigate the possibility of its determination in the presence of other drugs<br />
because some companies use the combination of two or more analgesics for more<br />
efficient response. Table 4.1.2 describes the interference caused by various analgesics<br />
with various ratios present in a solution containing 5 µgml −1 PC. It is evident from the<br />
table that in a 1:1 ratio of drug to PC, there is little or no interference while in a 5:1<br />
ratio, caffeine, diclofenic sodium and ascorbic acid show >±5.0% interference during<br />
PC determination. In a 10:1 ratio the caffeine and ascorbic acid are showing minimum<br />
58
interference as compared to their previous combinations. However, the last<br />
combination is rarely taken in analgesic formulations. So we can say that except<br />
caffeine and ascorbic acid, all other drugs are considered as producing no or little<br />
effect in analysis of PC up to certain possible limits. Similar interference studies have<br />
also been carried out by other workers (Chunli and Baoxin, 1995, Wirat and<br />
Saisunee., 2006). According to later reference, ascorbic acid has been included among<br />
the major interferers while caffeine has been declared as non-interfering one.<br />
Moreover, in the same citation (Wirat and Saisunee., 2006) acetyl salicylic acid has<br />
also been included in the major interferers but in that particular case the conditions<br />
and solution parameters were quite different than ours (Table 4.1.2).<br />
Table 4.1.2. % interference by various analgesics in different ratios on 5 µg ml -1 PC<br />
Ratio to PC<br />
Caffeine Diclofenic<br />
sodium<br />
% interference by drug<br />
Acetyl<br />
salicylic<br />
acid<br />
Ibuprofen Ascorbic<br />
acid<br />
1:1 +2.94 0.00 0.00 -2.94 -2.94<br />
5:1 +8.82 +5.88 0.00 0.00 +11.76<br />
10:1 0.00 +17.64 -14.71 0.00 -2.94<br />
59
Table. 4.1.3. Effect of strong and weak acids and bases on PC determination<br />
Acid / base (1M) Volume of acid<br />
/ base (ml)<br />
% effect pH of PC<br />
solution<br />
λmax<br />
(mid point)<br />
(nm)<br />
Hydrochloric acid 0.1 -2.94 2.13 243<br />
0.5 -2.94 1.72 243<br />
1 -2.94 1.35 243<br />
Acetic acid 0.1 -2.94 3.65 243<br />
0.5 0.00 3.29 243<br />
1 +2.94 3.16 243<br />
NaOH 0.1 +2.94 11.43 257<br />
0.5 0.00 12.28 257<br />
1 +5.88 12.50 257<br />
Ammonia 0.1 0.00 10.40 254<br />
4.1.6. Effect of Acidic and Basic Solutions<br />
0.5 0.00 10.70 255<br />
1 0.00 10.85 256<br />
The effect of adding various volumes of 1Mof various strong and weak acids and<br />
bases on the absorbance and wavelength shift of 5 µgml −1 PC solution was<br />
investigated and the results are given in the following table (Table 4.1.3). It is<br />
observed from the data that the addition of various quantity of 1MNH3 has no effect at<br />
all on the absorbance of PC. HCl and CH3COOH have positive or negative<br />
interference within the acceptable limit of ±5.0%. The only positive effect of +5.88 is<br />
shown after the addition of 1ml of 1M NaOH. It is seen from Fig. 4.1.4 that<br />
dependence of absorbance on concentration of PC is not much affected by variation in<br />
pH in this case and we can say that it is independent of pH. This quality helps in the<br />
analysis of PC in various types of acidic or basic solutions.<br />
60
Fig. 4.1.4. Shift of wavelength with pH: (A) 3.3 and (B) 12. 3 for 5 µgml -1 PC<br />
solution.<br />
4.1.7. Calibration Range<br />
The dependence of various concentrations of PC standard solution on absorbance in a<br />
measurable working range was evaluated at optimized parameters.<br />
Fig. 4.1.5. Calibration range of absorbance vs. concentration for PC from 0.3 to 20<br />
µgml -1 .<br />
61
Fig. 4.1.5 shows linear calibration range for standard PC solutions from 0.3 to 20<br />
µgml −1 . The lower detection limit for this was 0.1 µgml -1 with linear regression<br />
coefficient of 0.9999. The relative standard deviation for a 5 µgml −1 PC (n = 11) was<br />
found out to be 1.6%. The calibration range obtained by this method is better than that<br />
given by Erk et al., 2001, who reported a range of 2–30 µgml −1 for PC determination<br />
by ratio spectra derivative spectrophotometry. The lower detection limit of 0.1 µgml −1<br />
in our case is also closer to that of the later (0.097 µgml −1 ). The detection limit of<br />
current method is better than that reported by Wirat et al., 2006. Who described lower<br />
detection limit of 0.2µgml -1 for PC determination. The linearity of the current<br />
calibration plot is also better than that reported by other workers who described a<br />
linear regression value of 0.9974 for determining monoclinic form of PC (Ivanova,<br />
2005) using IR-LD spectroscopy. The r value of 0.9999 for the current method also<br />
proves the better linearity of our calibration plot in comparison to that described by<br />
Al-Zoubi et al 2002 who obtained the r value of 0.9965 and 0.9954 for eight<br />
calibration points each in case of monoclinic PC by FTIR and FT-Raman<br />
spectroscopy, respectively. Moreover, the lower standard deviation and lower<br />
detection limit values of the current method prove the advantage of its better<br />
repeatability and greater sensitivity over all these solid state methods mentioned<br />
above.<br />
4.1.8. Analysis of Tablets<br />
Table 4.1.4. shows the results of various locally manufactured tablets containing PC<br />
with mentioned and determined concentration of the analyte. Each true result was<br />
obtained after multiplying the actual result with dilution factor 50. The results<br />
obtained by the currently developed method are very close to those reported earlier<br />
(Chunli and Baoxin, 1995), which prove its validity for determination of PC by this<br />
62
method. Moreover, the standard deviation values by the current method are better than<br />
later.<br />
Table 4.1.4. Determination of PC in tables of various companies by proposed method<br />
Chemical<br />
formulation<br />
Mentioned<br />
concentration<br />
(mg unit -1 )<br />
Found concentration a<br />
(mg unit -1 )<br />
By proposed method Reported method<br />
[Chunli and Baoxin, 1995]<br />
Paracetamol 125 121 ± 2.2 121 ± 2.0<br />
Disprol 500 494 ± 2.2 491 ± 3.4<br />
Rascodal 500 497 ± 2.7 499 ± 4.8<br />
Calpol 500 485 ± 3.5 481 ± 3.8<br />
Panadol 500 466 ± 4.2 468 ± 4.4<br />
a , average value; ±, standard deviation (n=5)<br />
Table 4.1.5. Comparative analyses of PC in urine samples.<br />
Paracetamol a<br />
Urine sample By current method By reported method<br />
[Jelena, et al., 2003]<br />
(µg ml -1 ) % age (µg ml -1 ) %age<br />
1 464 ± 13 92.8 459 ±18 91.8<br />
2 475 ± 14 95.0 472 ± 12 94.4<br />
3 434 ± 07 86.6 435 ± 16 87.0<br />
4 427 ± 05 84.5 430 ± 09 86.0<br />
N=11, other abbreviations, as for table 4.<br />
4.1.9. Analysis of Urine Samples<br />
PC determination in four urine samples of four volunteers was conducted by<br />
recording absorbance of 1000 times diluted samples of urine without PC and with PC<br />
63
against double distilled water as blank in each case. The results obtained were<br />
interpreted after adjustment for dilution factor. The data are presented in Table 4.1.5.<br />
For determining PC in urine by comparative method (Jelena, et al., 2003), the dilution<br />
factor of 100 was used for urine sample and the data obtained after proper adjustment.<br />
It is seen from the table that the results obtained with the current method are very<br />
close to those obtained with the reported method. The results show that ≤95%<br />
paracetamol is excreted in urine after 12 h. Similar studies with 95% average<br />
excretion of PC in urine after 12 h have been reported earlier (Jelena, et al., 2003),<br />
which strengthens the confirmation of our results. UV spectra of diluted urine samples<br />
with and without PC are presented in Fig. 4.1.6. An average difference of absorbance<br />
4.2. Simpler and Faster Spectrophotometric Determination of<br />
Diclofenac Sodium (DS) in Tablets, Serum and Urine Samples<br />
The absorption spectra of DS in aqueous medium have been described by several<br />
workers (Matin et al. 2005; Ferreyra and Ortiz 2002). However up to the best of our<br />
knowledge, no attempt has been made so far to utilize the aqueous medium as one of<br />
the most reliable matrices for determining DS with excellent working linear range,<br />
sufficiently low detection limits and its application to many types of samples. So,<br />
various parameters were studied for their effect upon the UV-Visible<br />
spectrophotometric determination of DS.<br />
4.2.1. Influence of Time<br />
The effect of time on the absorbance behavior of 5 µg ml -1 aqueous solution of DS at<br />
276 nm was studied in the range of 1–90 minutes at room temperature of 25 ± 1 0 C<br />
using double distilled water as a blank solution (Fig. 4.2.1). It was observed that the<br />
absorbance remained constant throughout the whole period and thus independent of<br />
time.<br />
A<br />
0.18<br />
0.16<br />
0.14<br />
0.12<br />
0.1<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90<br />
Time (min)<br />
Fig. 4.2.1. Time effect on absorbance of Diclofenac Sodium<br />
65
Time effect has been described by other workers (Matin et al. 2005; Sirajuddin et al.<br />
2007) as well. The constant absorbance with time confirms the stability of the analyte<br />
and faster analysis of DS in aqueous solution.<br />
4.2.2. Effect of Temperature<br />
The effect of temperature on absorbance of 5µg ml -1 DS at 276 nm was observed in<br />
the range of 5–60 0 C (Fig. 4.2.2). It was seen that lower temperature range of 5–25 0 C<br />
showed maximum absorbance, with a little bit decreased value for the range of 30–45<br />
0 C was observed followed by a further decrease thereafter.<br />
A<br />
0.16<br />
0.15<br />
0.14<br />
0.13<br />
0.12<br />
5 15 25 35 45 55<br />
Temperature 0 C<br />
Fig. 4.2.2. Temperature effect on UV absorbance of 5 µg ml -1 DS solution.<br />
The possible reason of higher absorbance value at lower temperature may be due to<br />
the adsorption of DS and/ water molecules on the wall of quartz cell and thus<br />
absorbing a little bit higher amount of UV light (Sirajuddin et al. 2007). The lower<br />
absorbance at higher temperature may be due to the instability of DS molecules.<br />
66
However the room temperature (25 ± 1 0 C) was taken as optimum temperature in<br />
order to make the process simple by avoiding additional steps. Temperature studies<br />
have also been reported earlier (Matin et al. 2005) regarding the assay of DS.<br />
4.2.3. Interference by Various Analgesic Drugs<br />
The interference of various analgesic drugs at the absorbance on 5µg ml -1 DS solution<br />
in various proportions was checked to investigate the possibility of its determination<br />
in the presence of other drugs (Table 4.2.1).<br />
Table 4.2.1. % interference by various analgesics in different ratios on 5 µg ml -1 DS<br />
Ratio<br />
to DFS<br />
1:1<br />
5:1<br />
10:1<br />
(%) Interference<br />
Caffeine Paracetamol Aspirin Ibuprofen Ascorbic<br />
acid<br />
+5.47<br />
+49.72<br />
0.00<br />
+39.72<br />
+13.69<br />
-12.32<br />
-18.49<br />
-11.64<br />
+13.01<br />
+ 1.36<br />
-6.16<br />
-10.27<br />
-7.53<br />
-58.90<br />
-62.32<br />
In a 1:1 ratio caffeine and Ibuprofen show little interference while PC and aspirin are<br />
the major positive and negative interferers respectively. The positive interference by<br />
PC may be due to its somewhat structural similarity with or interaction with DS. The<br />
negative value shown by aspirin may be due interaction of central N atom of DS with<br />
the –COO group of aspirin thus hindering its presence to some extent as actual<br />
diclofenac. Other higher values of interference for a 5:1 ratio showing +49.72 %<br />
interference in case of caffeine may be due to indistinguishable wavelength (275 nm)<br />
(Ferreyra and Ortiz 2002) to that of DS (276 nm) which adds up to increase the total<br />
absorbance of DS. No interference at 10:1 ratio of caffeine to DS may be due to rate<br />
67
of interaction of DS with UV light in a first order manner where the higher<br />
concentration of second analyte is usually constant. The highest negative interference<br />
value for 5:1 and 10:1 ratio of ascorbic acid:DS may be due to the interaction of –<br />
COO groups of DS with attached -OH groups of ascorbic acid through H-bonding<br />
which then hinders the actual absorbing activity of DS. As the lower ratio (1:1, 1:2 or<br />
2:1) is usually taken in most of combined drugs, hence we can say that at usual<br />
combination level the mentioned drugs are showing interferences in acceptable<br />
values. However, the presence of PC or ascorbic acid will interfere with the true<br />
analytical value of DS.<br />
This has been observed that the amount of caffeine is quite high in the biological<br />
fluids such as urine, serum or whole blood because various natural foods contain<br />
sufficient amount of caffeine which is ultimately transferred in these fluids. So, no<br />
interference by the highest combination of caffeine and DS in 10:1 ratio is a good<br />
indicator for application of this method in the presence of high amount of caffeine<br />
especially in biological samples.<br />
4.2.4. Effect of Acidic and Alkaline Conditions<br />
Spectrophotometric study of 5 5µg ml -1 DS solution was carried out in various<br />
concentrations of strong and weak acids and bases. UV spectra of a 5 µg ml -1 DS<br />
solution are given (Fig. 4.2.3) to describe the shift in wavelength and absorbance of<br />
DS at extreme conditions of acidity and alkalinity.<br />
68
A<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
200 225 250 275 300 325 350<br />
Fig. 4.2.3. UV spectra of DS at acidic pH, 3.56 (lower) and basic pH, 11.68 (higher).<br />
Moreover, a detailed sketch of such effects upon the addition of different strong and<br />
weak acids and bases was also observed (Table 4.2.2). According to the data, more<br />
negative interference is true at lower pH values of DS solution. However as the pH is<br />
increased, the negative interference is decreased and reaches to acceptable limit. The<br />
value of λmax shifted from 273 nm to 276 nm by entering from acidic into basic<br />
conditions.<br />
nm<br />
69
Table 4.2.2. Effect of strong and weak acids and bases on DFS determination<br />
Acid / base (1M)<br />
Hydrochloric<br />
acid<br />
Acetic acid<br />
Ammonia<br />
NaOH<br />
Volume of acid<br />
/ base (ml)<br />
% effect<br />
pH of DS<br />
solution<br />
λmax<br />
(mid point)<br />
(nm)<br />
0.1 -10.67 2.44 273<br />
0.5 -14.44 2.07 273<br />
1.0 -18.31 1.73 273<br />
0.1 -5.97 3.78 273<br />
0.5 -8.32 3.56 273<br />
1.0 -12.06 3.24 273<br />
0.1 0.00 9.85 276<br />
0.5 -2.23 10.30 276<br />
1.0 -2.98 10.65 276<br />
0.1 -1.0 10.93 276<br />
0.5 -1.86 11.68 276<br />
1.0 -2.23 12.34 276<br />
Lower absorbance value of DS is linked with 2 factors. First is the solubility which<br />
depends upon pH and it is reported that solubility of DS is decreased in acidic<br />
solution. Secondly, DS is subjected to intramolecular cyclization at acidic pH and<br />
hence inactivated (Palomo et al. 1999). In basic conditions a reverse of cyclization<br />
restores the actual molecule along with maximum efficiency. However, a different<br />
situation is presented elsewhere (Matin et al. 2005) where acidic medium (HNO3)<br />
results in the formation of yellowish nitrated derivative of DS which absorbs heavily.<br />
According to our opinion in a protons rich (highly acidic) medium all the Na + ions are<br />
not easy to freed the diclofenac ions available for maximum absorption because the<br />
available protons (H + ions) try to repel the formation of free Na + ions due to similar<br />
charges. So when the number of H + ions decreases, the number of free diclofenac ions<br />
is increased accordingly that results in increased absorption. In case of basic solution,<br />
70
the Na + ions are accepted by the negative OH - ions and hence sufficient diclofenac<br />
ions are available for increased absorption. However the very little negative effect in<br />
basic solution is attributed to base hydrolysis of very limited number of diclofenac<br />
ions into smaller metabolites.<br />
4.2.5. Calibration Plot<br />
UV spectra were recorded at 276 nm for standard solutions of DS with different<br />
concentrations in the range of 0.1–30 µg ml -1 (Fig. 4.2.4.).<br />
A<br />
0.8<br />
0.7<br />
0.6<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
200 225 250 275 300 325 350<br />
Fig. 4.2.4. Calibration plot of absorbance verses concentration for DS solutions from<br />
below to above as 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 µg<br />
ml -1 . Linear equation obtained from calibration plot is represented as; Y=<br />
0.0269X+0.0041 with regression coefficient of 0.9998 and detection limit<br />
of 0.01 µg ml -1 at 276 nm.<br />
A relative standard deviation of 0.33 % was observed for a solution of 5 µg ml -1 DS<br />
(n=11) which describes an excellent reproducibility and repeatability of the method.<br />
4.2.6. Comparison with Other Reported Spectroscopic Methods<br />
A comparison of linear calibration range and detection limits of the current method<br />
with those of some other spectroscopic methods was also described (Table 4.2.3).<br />
nm<br />
71
Table 4.2.3. Comparison of current method with other spectroscopic methods for<br />
determination of DS<br />
Method Reference Linear range LOD<br />
Spectrofluorimetry Damiani et al.,<br />
1999<br />
FI spectroscopy Garcia et al.,<br />
1998<br />
0.2 – 5.0 µg ml -1 0.2 µg ml -1<br />
0.2 – 8 µg ml -1 0.023 µg ml -1<br />
UV-Vis. Spectrometry Matin et al. 2005 1-30 µg ml -1<br />
0.46 µg ml -1<br />
UV-Vis. Spectrometry Botello J.C. and<br />
Perez-Caballero.,<br />
1995<br />
0.8 –6.4 µg ml -1 0.37 µg ml -1<br />
UV-Vis. Spectrometry Mitic et al., 2007 1.59-38.18 µg ml -1 1.29 µg ml -1<br />
UV-Vis. Spectrometry Current method 0.1–30 µg ml -1 0.01 µg ml -1<br />
It is quite clear that despite using various complexing agents, still the working ranges<br />
and detection limits of the reported methods (Matin et al. 2005; Damian et al. 1999;<br />
Garcia et al. 1998; Botello et al. 1995; Mitic et al. 2007) could not compete with that<br />
of the currently developed method. The addition of other reagents for complex<br />
formation makes the other methods time consuming, complicated and expensive. Due<br />
to the lack of the mentioned problems, better sensitivity, broader linear range and<br />
environmental friendly nature, the newly investigated method has a clear edge over<br />
described methods. Moreover, the method is also better than some other reported<br />
methods described in section 1, which possess nearly similar problems as true in case<br />
of reported spectroscopic methods.<br />
4.2.7. Analysis of Tablets<br />
A representative UV spectrum of DS in a randomly selected sample of tablets<br />
(Diclofen) diluted to 5 µg ml -1 DS according to the mentioned concentration is<br />
described (Fig. 4.2.5). The clarity of the signal proves no interference from the matrix.<br />
72
A<br />
0.5<br />
0.4<br />
0.3<br />
0.2<br />
0.1<br />
0.0<br />
200 225 250 275 300 325 350<br />
Fig. 4.2.5. Representative UV-spectrum of expected 5 µg ml -1 DS in (Diclofen) tablet.<br />
The average results of various locally manufactured tablets containing DS with<br />
mentioned and determined concentration for 5 replicate runs were recorded (Table<br />
4.2.4). Each actual result was obtained after multiplying the determined concentration<br />
with dilution factor of 100.<br />
Table 4.2.4. Determination of DS in tablets of various companies by proposed<br />
method<br />
Chemical<br />
formulation<br />
Fenac<br />
Dichloran<br />
Voltral<br />
Ardifenac<br />
Diclofenac<br />
Mentioned<br />
concentration<br />
(mg unit -1 )<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
50<br />
a , average value; ±, standard deviation (n=5)<br />
nm<br />
Actual Concentration a Recovery<br />
(%)<br />
mg unit -1<br />
51.153 ± 0.005<br />
50.646 ± 0.005<br />
49.388 ± 0.008<br />
50.923 ± 0.004<br />
49.837 ± 0.003<br />
102.31± 0.011<br />
101.21 ± 0.011<br />
98.68 ± 0.016<br />
101.85 ± 0.008<br />
99.87 ± 0.006<br />
73
The closeness of mentioned and calculated concentrations of DS in the collected<br />
tablets samples proves the validity of the method and lack of interference from the<br />
excipients.<br />
4.2.8. Analysis of Urine and Serum Samples<br />
10 fold diluted urine or serum sample was processed according to the procedure<br />
mentioned in experimental section. Representative spectra of each of urine and serum<br />
sample are demonstrated respectively (Fig. 4.2.6 and Fig. 4.2.7). For each spectral<br />
observation, the diluted blank and DS containing urine or serum sample of the same<br />
individual was processed.<br />
A<br />
2.0<br />
1.6<br />
1.2<br />
0.8<br />
0.4<br />
0.0<br />
200 225 250 275 300 325 350 375 400<br />
nm<br />
Fig. 4.2.6. UV spectra showing blank (black), DS containing (blue) and DS spiked<br />
(red) urine.<br />
74
A<br />
0.30<br />
0.25<br />
0.20<br />
0.15<br />
0.10<br />
0.05<br />
0.00<br />
200 225 250 275 300 325 350<br />
Fig. 4.2.7. UV spectra showing blank (black), DS containing (blue) and DS spiked<br />
(red) serum.<br />
In case of blank urine sample a hump is seen which reflects the presence of sufficient<br />
amount of caffeine because it has nearly similar λmax (275 nm) Ferreyra and Ortiz,<br />
2002, as DS (276 nm). In all samples, the absorbance of blank was considered as zero<br />
for DS. A clear signal represented by blue line indicates the presence and absorption<br />
spectrum of DS in the urine sample of the individual. The value is however blue<br />
shifted due to the acidic pH and presence of some other ingredients in case of urine<br />
samples. In case of serum sample the lower spectrum shows the presence of caffeine<br />
at lower concentration indicating that very little of it is retained by the serum while<br />
most is removed in urine. The results also show that DS containing serum sample<br />
from the individual administered with 50 mg tablet has a higher absorbance value as<br />
compared to his blank serum sample showing the presence of DS because caffeine is<br />
constant for both samples. The spiking of each diluted urine and serum sample was<br />
nm<br />
75
performed with 40 µl of DS solution in order to confirm the peak signal and hence the<br />
presence of DS in the serum sample.<br />
The results of DS in 4 urine and 4 serum samples by the currently developed method<br />
were observed (Table 4.2.5). Each sample of urine and serum with specific number<br />
(e.g. urine 1 and serum 1) was collected from same individual at different times as<br />
described in experimental section.<br />
Table 4.2.5. Concentration of determined DS and its relation with ingested DS by<br />
oral administration<br />
Sample type DS found (µg ml -1 ) a Actual DS (µg ml -1 ) a DS % of ingested<br />
tablet<br />
Urine 1 3.49 ± 0.010 34.9 ± 0.10 69.8<br />
Urine 2 2.93 ± 0.0120 29.3 ± 0.12 58.6<br />
Urine 3 2.34 ± 0.0160 23.4 ± 0.16 46.8<br />
Urine 4 2.56 ± 0.020 25.6 ± 0.20 51.2<br />
Serum 1 1.14 ± 0.004 11.4 ± 0.04 11.8<br />
Serum 2 1.09 ± 0.004 10.9 ± 0.04 21.8<br />
Serum 3 1.22 ± 0.005 12.2 ± 0.05 24.4<br />
Serum 4 1.15 ± 0.006 11.5 ± 0.06 23.0<br />
a<br />
, average of three replicates<br />
DS in each sample was determined with the help of linear equation and multiplied by<br />
dilution factor 10 in order to get the actual concentration of the ingested DS<br />
transferred to respective urine or serum sample. The data show that the urine and<br />
serum contents of DS have the range of 46.8–62.0 % and 10.09–12.2 % respectively<br />
for a 50 mg ingested tablet. The remaining DS may be present in plasma and/ or<br />
converted to inactive metabolites. As there is no satisfactory data available for DS<br />
contents in these fluids hence we rely upon the currently investigated data. Further<br />
studies in this regard could throw sufficient light upon actual kinetics of this drug and<br />
its fate in the body fluids.<br />
76
4.3. Differential Pulse Voltammetric Determination of PC in Tablet<br />
and Urine Samples at Carbon Film Electrode<br />
4.3.1. Influence of pH on PC at DC and DP Voltammetry.<br />
Firstly, the electrochemical responses of PC on CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer in pH<br />
range from 2-12 were investigated by DC and DP voltammetry. As can be seen in<br />
Figure 4.3.1.<br />
2<br />
I, µA<br />
1<br />
0<br />
A 600<br />
E , mV 1/2<br />
400<br />
10 9<br />
11<br />
8<br />
12<br />
6<br />
7<br />
4<br />
5<br />
200<br />
2 7 12<br />
pH<br />
3 2<br />
200 500<br />
E, mV<br />
800<br />
4<br />
I, µA<br />
2<br />
0<br />
B<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
12<br />
7<br />
8<br />
6<br />
5<br />
1<br />
4<br />
600<br />
E, mV<br />
400<br />
200<br />
2<br />
3<br />
2 7 pH 12<br />
200 500 800<br />
E, mV<br />
Fig. 4.3.1. DC voltammograms (A) and DP voltammograms (B) of Paracetamol (c =<br />
100 μmol L -1 ) at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2 to 12 (numbers<br />
above curves correspond to given pH) without electrode regeneration.<br />
Inset is corresponding dependence of peak potential on the pH.<br />
The influence of different pH from 2-12 in B-R buffer are summarized in (table. 4.3.1)<br />
which shows different peak currents at different peak potentials of paracetamol at DC<br />
and DP voltammetry.<br />
77
Table 4.3.1. The influence of pH on DCV and DPV of Paracetamol, c = 100 μmol L -1<br />
pH<br />
DC Voltammetry DP Voltammetry<br />
Ip, nA Ep, mV Ip, nA Ep, mV<br />
2 817 597 1633 584<br />
3 905 553 1633 541<br />
4 1360 508 2524 464<br />
5 1170 463 2285 410<br />
6 736 419 771 367<br />
7 784 374 7123 317<br />
8 748 329 598 297<br />
9 1141 285 598 238<br />
10 896 240 700 212<br />
11 822 195 889 178<br />
12 344 151 305 159<br />
PC gives one well defined anodic wave / peak which is similar to that observed for an<br />
unmodified glassy carbon electrode Miner et. al, 1981, Van Benschoten et al. 1983,<br />
investigated the electrochemical oxidation of PC using cyclic voltammetry. The first<br />
reaction step is an electrochemical oxidation involving two electrons and two protons<br />
to generate N-acetyl-p-quinoneimine. All subsequent reaction steps are non-<br />
electrochemical, but pH-dependent processes (slope around –50 mV per pH unit or –<br />
43 mV per pH unit for DCV or DPV, respectively). For oxidations at pH values<br />
higher than 6, the final product is a benzoquinone Skeika, et. al. 2008. The best<br />
developed wave and also peak was obtained in BR buffer at pH 4 in aqueous medium.<br />
This medium was further used for measuring of calibration dependences. DPV was<br />
used for further measurements due to its higher sensitivity and easy evaluation.<br />
4.3.2. Optimization of Parameters and Calibration Curve<br />
Repeated measurements revealed passivation of the electrode, probably by products of<br />
the electrode reaction, resulting in decreasing peaks moving toward more negative<br />
potentials. Effect of passivation of the electrode surface was reduced by<br />
electrochemical regeneration of electrode surface with settings of regeneration<br />
78
potentials to values Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV (values were optimized by<br />
series of trials) as shown in Fig.4.3.2.<br />
3000<br />
I, nA<br />
1500<br />
3000<br />
I p , nA<br />
1500<br />
0<br />
0 25 N 50<br />
0<br />
200 500 800<br />
E, mV<br />
Fig. 4.3.2. Repetitive measurements of 100 μmol L -1 Paracetamol using DPV at CFE<br />
in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0 with regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400<br />
mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV Inset is corresponding dependence of peak<br />
current on the number of scans.<br />
Linear calibration curves were obtained using optimal regeneration potentials in the<br />
concentration ranges from 0.02 to100 µmol L -1 . These parameters are summarized in<br />
Table 4.3.2.<br />
Table 4.3.2. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the determination of<br />
Paracetamol in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0 using DPV at CFE<br />
with regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV, and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Concentration<br />
range<br />
[μmol L -1 ]<br />
20 – 100<br />
2 – 10<br />
0.2 – 1<br />
0.02 – 0.1<br />
Slope<br />
[nA.μmol L -1 ]<br />
29.7<br />
48.3<br />
48.7<br />
58.5<br />
Intercept<br />
[nA]<br />
49.5<br />
15.8<br />
1.15<br />
2.28<br />
R<br />
0.9976<br />
0.9981<br />
0.9987<br />
0.9982<br />
LOD<br />
[μmol L -1 ]<br />
–<br />
–<br />
–<br />
0.034<br />
79
The voltammograms connected with the concentration ranges from 20-100 μmol L -1 ,<br />
2-10 μmol L -1 , 0.2-1.0 μmol L -1 and 0.02-0.1 μmol L -1 with correlation coefficients<br />
(R) of 0.9976, 0.9981, 0.9987 and 0.9982 respectively. This shows that the developed<br />
method is very sensitive for salicylic acid determination as depicted in Fig. 4.3.3, Fig.<br />
4.3.4, Fig. 4.3.5. and Fig. 4.3.6. respectively, for illustration.<br />
3000<br />
I, nA<br />
1500<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
3000<br />
I , nA p<br />
1500<br />
0<br />
0 50 c, µM 100<br />
1<br />
0<br />
200 500 E, mV 800<br />
Fig. 4.3.3. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6) 100<br />
μmol L -1 . Regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Background current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence.<br />
80
600<br />
I, nA<br />
400<br />
200<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
I , nA p<br />
250<br />
0<br />
0 5 c, µM 10<br />
200 500 800<br />
E, mV<br />
500<br />
Fig. 4.3.4. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 μmol<br />
L -1 . Regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Background current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence.<br />
200<br />
I, nA<br />
150<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
50<br />
I p , nA<br />
0<br />
0.0 0.5<br />
c, µM<br />
1.0<br />
100<br />
200<br />
1<br />
500<br />
E, mV<br />
800<br />
25<br />
Fig. 4.3.5. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c(PC): (1) 0, (2) 0,2 (3) 0,4, (4) 0,6, (5) 0,8, (6) 1<br />
μmol L -1 . Regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Background current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence.<br />
81
200<br />
I, nA<br />
150<br />
6<br />
I , nA p<br />
5<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3 2<br />
0<br />
0.00 0.05<br />
c, µM<br />
0.10<br />
100<br />
200 500 800<br />
E, mV<br />
10<br />
1<br />
Fig. 4.3.6. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 4.0, c (PC): (1) 0, (2) 0,02 (3) 0,04, (4) 0,06, (5) 0,08,<br />
(6) 0,1 μmol L -1 . Regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300<br />
mV. Background current = 1.94 nA. Inset is corresponding calibration<br />
dependence.<br />
Adsorptive stripping voltammetry was tested for increasing the sensitivity of this<br />
method but no accumulation effect was observed in range accumulation potential<br />
from –300 mV to +300 mV and accumulation time up to 500 s.<br />
4.3.3. Analysis of <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Drugs<br />
Commercial pharmaceutical samples (tablets) containing PC were analyzed in order<br />
to evaluate the validity of this proposed method. Recovery experiments were carried<br />
out to evaluate matrix effects after standard-solution additions yielded a good average<br />
recovery (Table 4.3.3).<br />
82
Table 4.3.3. The amount of Paracetamol determined by DPV in tablets of<br />
commercial drugs with declare contents 500 mg of Paracetamol.<br />
Name of tablet Company name<br />
Paralen<br />
Panadol<br />
Paracetamol<br />
Coldrex<br />
Zentiva. Cz<br />
Glaxosmithkline<br />
Glaxosmithkline<br />
Glaxosmithkline<br />
Contents of Paracetamol<br />
[mg]<br />
494<br />
496<br />
503<br />
493<br />
Recovery<br />
[%]<br />
98.8 ± 3<br />
99.1 ± 2<br />
100.7 ± 2<br />
98.5 ± 4<br />
Indicating that there were no important matrix interferences for the samples analyzed<br />
by the proposed DPV method, and had the corresponding results to reference<br />
spectrometric determination electrochemically active ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is<br />
often combined as a medicine with PC based drugs. As documented in Fig. 4.3.7. no<br />
significant interference effect was observed in the developed DPV method up to<br />
tenfold concentration of Ascorbic acid in comparison to concentration of PC.<br />
200<br />
I, nA<br />
100<br />
0<br />
110<br />
90<br />
70<br />
50<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
200<br />
I , nA p<br />
100<br />
0<br />
0 50 100<br />
Ascorbic Acid<br />
c, µM<br />
200 500 E, mV 800<br />
Fig. 4.3.7. Differential pulse voltammograms of Paracetamol 10 μmol L -1 with<br />
Ascorbic acid from 10 to 100 μmol L -1 (concentrations are written<br />
above curves in plot) at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0,<br />
regeneration potential Ereg1 = –400 mV, and Ereg2 = 1300 mV. Inset is<br />
corresponding dependence of peak current of PC on concentration of<br />
Ascorbic acid.<br />
83
4.3.4. Analysis of Urine Samples<br />
For testing the possibility of determination of PC in human urine samples the method<br />
of calibration curve was used. Calibration curves and ranges of determination for<br />
analyzed drug in model solutions of human urine gave linear response in the<br />
concentration ranges of 2 – 10 (Fig. 4.3.8.A) and 20 – 100 mol.l -1 (Fig. 4.3.8.B).<br />
240<br />
I, nA<br />
160<br />
80<br />
A<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
1<br />
150<br />
I p , nA<br />
0<br />
0 5 10<br />
c, µM<br />
200 500<br />
E, mV<br />
800<br />
75<br />
1600<br />
I, nA<br />
800<br />
B<br />
20<br />
100<br />
80<br />
60<br />
40<br />
1400<br />
I p , nA<br />
700<br />
0<br />
0 50 100<br />
c, µM<br />
0<br />
200<br />
0<br />
500<br />
E, mV<br />
800<br />
Fig. 4.3.8. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine with model sample of<br />
Paracetamol (2 – 10 µmol L -1 (A), and 20 – 100 µmol L -1 (B),<br />
concentration is written next to curves in plots) sample at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 4.0, regeneration potentials Ereg1 = –400<br />
mV, and Ereg2 = 1300 mV. Inset is corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
The calibration curves show linear response over the whole range of concentration<br />
used in the assay procedure. The parameters associated are summarized in Table<br />
4.3.4. Further parameters of the calibration straight line are seen in Table 4.3.4.<br />
84
Table 4.3.4. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the determination of<br />
model samples of Paracetamol in urine, media of Britton-Robinson<br />
buffer pH 4.0 using DPV at CFE with regeneration potentials Ereg1 = –<br />
400 mV and Ereg2 = 1300 mV.<br />
Concetration range<br />
[μmol -1 .l]<br />
20 – 100<br />
2 – 10<br />
Slope<br />
[nA.μmol -1 .l]<br />
12.91<br />
14.17<br />
Intercept<br />
[nA]<br />
31.66<br />
–7.61<br />
R LOD<br />
[μ mol -1 .l]<br />
0.9975<br />
0.9994<br />
–<br />
0.48<br />
85
4.4. Quantification of Ibuprofen in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceuticals and Biological<br />
Samples by Transmission FTIR Spectroscopy.<br />
The main object of the current study was to develop a new rapid method by FTIR<br />
spectroscopy which is equally sensitive for standards, pharmaceutical and biological<br />
samples in liquid form containing ibuprofen under similar conditions that can be<br />
frequently used for the routine quality control in pharmaceutical industries and for<br />
quantification in diagnostic laboratories as no method already exists. The existing<br />
methods using high cost instruments which although provide good sensitivity but at<br />
the same time they suffer from the draw backs of time consumption as well as<br />
intensive labor involved. The current method uses the approach to quantify ibuprofen<br />
in pharmaceuticals as well as biological sample such as urine by FTIR Spectroscopy<br />
under optimized parameters. PLS multivariate calibration model was applied here in<br />
order to correlate the measurements collected between different variables on the same<br />
observations in multi-component mixtures as PLS works on the principle of<br />
computing large amount of information which is common between the different<br />
variables with maximal covariance.<br />
4.4.1. Analysis of <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Samples<br />
For the quantification of ibuprofen in pharmaceutical samples, calibration was<br />
prepared in the range of 10-100 ppm on FTIR under optimized parameters with very<br />
good linearity R 2 =0.998 as shown in (Fig. 4.4.1) by excellent response of the FTIR<br />
with the increasing concentration.<br />
86
Fig. 4.4.1. Calibration plot in the range of 10-100 ppm for biological samples<br />
The calibration results clearly depict the significant sensitivity and selectivity for the<br />
analyte under examination hence proving the method to be useful. The results<br />
expressed in Table 4.4.1 were highly reproducible with negligible variation as taken<br />
for five replicate measurements.<br />
Table 4.4.1. Results for the ibuprofen concentration found in the tablet samples<br />
Sample<br />
Ibuprofen labeled<br />
mg/Tablet<br />
Ibuprofen found<br />
mg/Tablet<br />
Sample 01 400 412 ± 1.21<br />
Sample 02 400 397 ± 0.71<br />
Sample 03 400 408 ± 1.73<br />
Sample 04 400 403 ± 1.14<br />
Sample 05 400 389 ± 0.85<br />
Sample 06 400 403 ± 1.52<br />
87
There was very good conformity between obtained results and the values labeled on<br />
the formulations, which determines the suitability of the proposed procedure for the<br />
determination of ibuprofen in pharmaceutical sample and are according to the limits<br />
of pharmacopoeia. To check the validity of the newly developed method the known<br />
amounts of ibuprofen was added to the commercial formulation as in Fig. 4.4.2.<br />
Spike 3<br />
Spike 2<br />
Spike 1<br />
Tablet sample<br />
Fig. 4.4.2. <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Tablet sample and spikes of 30 ppm, 50 ppm and 70 ppm<br />
Ibuprofen standard.<br />
The recovery was measured by comparing the concentration of pharmaceutical<br />
sample before spiking with that obtained from the spiked samples. After the addition<br />
we observed that the amount of standard added was almost fully recovered with the %<br />
recovery of (98.53, 99.66, 102.02) and were within acceptable limits according to<br />
AOAC guidelines for single laboratory validation of chemical methods for dietary<br />
supplements and botanicals [AOAC, 2002] as given in Table 4.4.2. The coefficient of<br />
variation (CV) values was also small showing that the results were acceptable.<br />
88
Table 4.4.2. Recovery result of ibuprofen from tablet samples after spiking with<br />
known concentrations of standard<br />
(A)<br />
ppm<br />
(B)<br />
ppm<br />
By FT-IR<br />
(C) Recovery a CV b<br />
(%) (%)<br />
1 30 20 49.56. ± 1.25 98.53 1.6<br />
2 50 20 69.83 ± 0.8 99.66 1.3<br />
3 70 20 91.42 ± 1.4 102.02 1.5<br />
(A) Exogenous addition<br />
(B) Before addition<br />
(C) After addition<br />
a Recovery (%)=(C–B)/A x100.<br />
Acceptable recovery (%)<br />
[AOAC, 2002]<br />
90-108<br />
b Coefficient of variation was obtained from the mean of five replicate tests.<br />
4.4.2. Analysis of Urine Samples<br />
For the analysis of ibuprofen in urine samples the same method worked effectively as<br />
the results were precise and reproducible listed in Table 4.4.3. The same calibration<br />
range was used as it also covered the lower range of the analyte specie in urine<br />
sample.<br />
89
Table 4.4.3. Results for the ibuprofen concentration found in urine samples<br />
Sample<br />
Ibuprofen<br />
concentration found<br />
(ppm)<br />
Standard Deviation<br />
Sample 01 11.32 0.81<br />
Sample 02 11.64 0.34<br />
Sample 03 10.75 0.73<br />
Sample 04 11.03 0.24<br />
Sample 05 11.94 0.85<br />
The spectra of extracted urine as blank was collected on FTIR, then a selected urine<br />
sample were spiked with 10 and 20 ppm respectively (these spectra are shown in Fig.<br />
4.4.3.) to check the response and accuracy of the method.<br />
Fig. 4.4.3. Sample urine and 2 spikes of 10 and 20 ppm ibuprofen standard.<br />
90
The results of blank urine sample and spiking are given in Table 4.4.3 which show<br />
very good recovery of the standard added to the sample as recovery is ranging from<br />
98.6 to 100.15 % with very small variation which is clear indication of the reliability<br />
of the method for biological fluid.<br />
Table 4.4.4. Recovery results of ibuprofen in urine samples after spiking with known<br />
concentration of standard<br />
(A) ppm<br />
(B)<br />
ppm<br />
By FT-IR<br />
(C) Recovery a CV b<br />
(%) (%)<br />
1 10 11 20.86 ± 1.3 98.6 2.1<br />
2 20 11 31.03 ± 0.8 100.15 1.4<br />
(A) Exogenous addition<br />
(B) Before addition<br />
(C) After addition<br />
a Recovery (%)=(C–B)/A x100.<br />
b Coefficient of variation was obtained from the mean of five replicate tests.<br />
All the measurements were taken in five replicates to ensure reproducibility and this<br />
can be explained by very low values of standard deviation. Fig. 4.4.5. shows group<br />
spectra of the ibuprofen standards acquired for the calibration to analyze ibuprofen in<br />
urine and pharmaceutical sample analyzed using this method.<br />
91
Fig. 4.4.5. Group Spectra of ibuprofen Standards<br />
From the spectra we can understand that there is very negligible interference from the<br />
other matrix present in the sample while analyzing the analyte of our interest. The<br />
residual mean standard error of calibration (RMSEC) values of 1.06 was achieved<br />
after comparison of actual and computed concentration for all the standards which<br />
explain the accuracy of the method with very good precision.<br />
4.4.3. Limits of Detection and Quantitation<br />
The analysis at the lowest concentration which produced substantial signal was<br />
repeated eleven times and calculated by the following formula:<br />
LOD = 3 × SD × C / M<br />
Where SD is the standard deviation; C is the concentration of analyte and M is the<br />
mean peak area. While LOQ was determined by the same way with following<br />
equation: LOQ = 10 × SD × C / M<br />
The lowest concentration of Ibuprofen to be detected through this method was found<br />
to be 0.77 ppm and quantification limit was found to be 2.54 ppm for IBP<br />
determination.<br />
92
3000<br />
I, nA<br />
1500<br />
4.5. Differential Pulse Voltammetric Determination of Salicylic acid<br />
and Acetylsalicylic acid in Tablet and Urine Samples at Carbon<br />
Film Electrode<br />
4.5.1. Influence of pH on Salicylic Acid in DC and DP Voltammetry<br />
Fig. 4.5.1A describes the influence of pH from 2-12 of BR buffer on Ip salicylic acid<br />
using DC voltammetry. The results showed that at the maximum ions mobility at pH<br />
2 of BR buffer, the peak height is increased for salicylic acid while others are<br />
decreased due to over extent of ions of salicylic acid from pH 3-10 and others pH of<br />
BR buffer did not show peaks of salicylic acid at pH 11-12 due to over the surface of<br />
CFE electrode. So pH 2 of BR buffer was selected for further study. Fig. 4.5.1B<br />
shows the effect of pH of BR buffer from 2-12 using DP voltammetry to compare the<br />
sensitivity of salicylic acid for both techniques.<br />
900<br />
E , mV 1/2<br />
600<br />
2 4 6 8 10 12<br />
pH<br />
12<br />
11<br />
8<br />
4<br />
10<br />
9<br />
5<br />
6<br />
0<br />
200 700 E, mV 1200<br />
3<br />
2<br />
7<br />
3000<br />
I, nA<br />
1500<br />
0<br />
1200<br />
E, mV<br />
600<br />
0<br />
2 4 6 8 10 12<br />
pH<br />
A B<br />
12<br />
200 700<br />
E, mV<br />
1200<br />
4<br />
8<br />
5<br />
10 11<br />
6<br />
9 7<br />
Fig. 4.5.1. A and B. DC & DP voltammograms of Salicylic Acid (c = 100 μmol L -1 )<br />
at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2 to 12 (numbers in above curves<br />
correspond to given pH). Inset is corresponding dependence of peak<br />
potential on the pH.<br />
We concluded that the response of salicylic acid with enhanced peak current was at<br />
pH 2 with smooth background current. Due to sensitivity of DP voltammograms, we<br />
selected DP voltammetry for further studies. The influence of different pH from 2-12<br />
2<br />
93<br />
3
in B-R buffer are summarized in (table. 4.5.1) which shows different peak currents at<br />
different peak potentials of Salicylic acid at DC and DP voltammetry.<br />
Table 4.5.1. The influence of pH on DCV and DPV of Salicylic Acid (c = 100 μmol L -1 )<br />
pH<br />
DC Voltammetry DP Voltammetry<br />
Ip, nA Ep, mV Ip, nA Ep, mV<br />
2 2097 1074 2793 1065<br />
3 934 1036 1185 1028<br />
4 1078 993 1944 990<br />
5 820 963. 1060 944<br />
6 713 909. 866 899<br />
7 731 888 746 871<br />
8 1423 875 1302 864<br />
9 838 881 736 817<br />
10 895 825 736 817<br />
11 721 862 372 864<br />
12 168 580 83 521<br />
For the sake of comparison between DC and DP voltammetric determination of<br />
salicylic acid at optimal conditions was made (Supalkova, et al., 2006). All the results<br />
were obtained at pH 2 of BR buffer. The results indicate that better sensitivity can be<br />
obtained at DP voltammetry in comparison to DC voltammetry.<br />
4.5.2. Reproducibility of Salicylic Acid<br />
The peak current for stability 100 µmol L -1 of salicylic acid was studied. Figure 4.5.2<br />
displays voltammogram from series of 45 successive measurements with different<br />
activation potentials at -2000 mV, 1500 mV and 2200 mV. In these three activated<br />
potentials the best stability peak current was seen at activation potential 2200 mV. It<br />
means that activation potential 2200 mV reveals excellent reproducibility of the<br />
salicylic acid at pH 2 of BR buffer at CFE.<br />
94
I, nA<br />
3000<br />
1500<br />
0<br />
0 4 8<br />
Fig. 4.5.2. Repetitive measurements of 100 μmol L -1 Salicylic Acid using DPV at<br />
CFE in Britton- Robinson Buffer pH 2.0 with activation potential (1) –<br />
2000,(2) 1500 and (3) 2200mV<br />
4.5.3. Linear Calibration Curves of Salicylic Acid<br />
Under optimized experimental conditions, calibration plots were performed for<br />
salicylic acid using activation potential 2200 mV at CFE. Both high and low<br />
concentration ranges in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2 were obtained. The peak<br />
current increased linearly with the increasing concentrations of salicylic acid in the<br />
concentration ranges of 20-100 μmol L -1 , 2-10 μmol L -1 and 0.2-1.0 μmol L -1 with<br />
correlation coefficients ( R) of 0.9993, 0.9994 and 0.9996 respectively . This shows<br />
that the developed method is very sensitive for salicylic acid determination as<br />
depicted in Fig. 4.5.3, Fig. 4.5.4 and Fig. 4.5.5. respectively.<br />
N<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
95
2400<br />
I, nA<br />
1600<br />
800<br />
1500<br />
I p , nA<br />
750<br />
0<br />
0 50 c, µM 100<br />
750 1000 E, mV 1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.3. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2) 20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 8,0 (6)<br />
100 μmol L -1 . Activation of potential = 2200 mV for 120 sec. Inset is<br />
corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
750<br />
I, nA<br />
500<br />
250<br />
200<br />
I p , nA<br />
100<br />
0<br />
0 5 c, µM 10<br />
750 1000 E, mV 1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.4. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2) 2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10 μmol<br />
L -1 . Activation of potential=2200mV for 120 sec Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence.<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
96
80<br />
I, nA<br />
60<br />
40<br />
20<br />
I , nA p<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0.0 0.5<br />
c, µM<br />
1.0<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
800 1000 E, mV 1200<br />
Fig. 4.5.5. Differential pulse voltammograms of Salicylic Acid at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c (SA): (1) 0, (2) 0.2 (3) 0.4, (4) 0.6, (5) 0.8, (6)<br />
1 μmol L -1 . Activation of potential = 2200 mV for 120 sec. Inset is<br />
corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
The observed splitting of the peak can be connected with different mechanism of the<br />
oxidation of salicylic acid. The limit of detection was obtained 0.21 µM of salicylic<br />
acid. Relatively big intercept complicated the use of the calibration curve but it does<br />
not make it impossible (see table 4.5.2.).<br />
Table 4.5.2. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the determination of<br />
Salicylic Acid in a Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0 using DPV at<br />
CFE with activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Concentration range<br />
[μ mol L -1 ]<br />
20 – 100<br />
2 – 10<br />
0.2-1<br />
Slope<br />
[nA μmol L -1 ]<br />
13.43<br />
16.73<br />
18.52<br />
4.5.4. Hydrolysis of Acetylsalicylic Acid<br />
Intercept<br />
[nA]<br />
35.77<br />
9.58<br />
0.84<br />
1<br />
R<br />
0.9993<br />
0.9994<br />
0.9996<br />
L O D<br />
[μ mol L -1 ]<br />
–<br />
–<br />
0.21<br />
In figure 4.5.6. DP voltammogram shows the hydrolysis of acetylsalicylic acid into<br />
salicylic acid at CFE of pH 2 in B-R buffer. The peak current shows the same peak<br />
97
current of salicylic acid and acetylsalicylic acid (Aspirin) at 2 minutes with activation<br />
potential 2200 mV for 120 sec.<br />
900<br />
I, nA<br />
600<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
300<br />
750 1000 E, mV 1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.6. Differential pulse voltammograms of 10 μmol L -1 hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic<br />
Acid at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, (1) Electrolyte, (2) 10 μmol<br />
L -1 without hydrolysis (3) 10 μmol L -1 Salicylic Acid (4) 10 μmol L -1 after<br />
hydrolysis Acetylsalicylic acid. Activation potential=2200mV for 120 sec<br />
4.5.5. Linear Calibration Curves of Hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE<br />
The calibration dependences of hydrolyzed acetylsalicylic acid for DPV at CFE were<br />
measured in concentration ranges, 20-100 μmol L -1 , 2-10 μmol L -1 and 0.2-1.0 μmol<br />
L -1 depicted in Fig 4.5.7, Fig 4.5.8. and Fig 4.5.9. in Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2<br />
with pulse amplitude 50 mV, pulse width 80 ms and scan rate 20 mV s -1 with<br />
correlation corresponding coefficients (R) of 0.9996, 0.9991 and 0.9996 respectively.<br />
1<br />
98
2000<br />
I, nA<br />
1000<br />
1500<br />
I p , nA<br />
750<br />
0<br />
0 50 c, µM 100<br />
1<br />
0<br />
750 1000 E, mV 1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.7. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0, (2) 20 (3) 40, (4) 60, (5) 80, (6)<br />
100 μmol L -1 . Activation potential = 2200 mV for 120 sec. Inset is<br />
corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
300<br />
I, nA<br />
200<br />
100<br />
200<br />
I p , nA<br />
100<br />
0<br />
0 5 c, µM 10<br />
750 1000 E, mV 1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.8. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c (ASA): (1) 0, (2) 2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8, (6) 10<br />
μmol L -1 . Activation potential = 2200 mV for 120 sec. Inset is<br />
corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
99
120<br />
I, nA<br />
80<br />
20<br />
I , nA p<br />
10<br />
0<br />
0.0 0.5 1.0<br />
c, µM<br />
40<br />
750 1000 E, mV 1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.9. DP voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0, (2) 0.2 (3) 0.4, (4) 0.6, (5) 0.8, (6)<br />
1 μmol L -1 . Activation potential = 2200 mV for 120 sec. Inset is<br />
corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
The limit of detection obtained was 0.15µM for acetylsalicylic acid. This shows that<br />
the developed method is very sensitive for hydrolyzed acetylsalicylic acid. The<br />
optimized parameters obtained for linear calibration curves are summarized in table<br />
4.5.3.<br />
Table 4.5.3. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the determination of<br />
hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid in a Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0<br />
using DPV at CFE with activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Concentration range<br />
[μmol L -1 ]<br />
20 – 100<br />
2 – 10<br />
0.2-1<br />
Slope<br />
[nA μmol L -1 ]<br />
13.93<br />
18.20<br />
20.17<br />
Intercept<br />
[nA]<br />
17.2<br />
3.11<br />
0.43<br />
6<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
5<br />
1<br />
R<br />
0.9996<br />
0.9991<br />
0.9996<br />
4.5.6. Determination of Salicylic Acid in Different Drugs<br />
L O D<br />
[μmol L -1 ]<br />
–<br />
–<br />
0.15<br />
The developed method was tested for salicylic acid determination in 4 µM Duofilm<br />
and Saloxyl drugs. The different concentrations of salicylic acid were spiked upto<br />
100
10µM for the determination of salicylic acid at CFE. Good linear calibration curves<br />
were found as given in figure 4.5.10.<br />
240<br />
I, nA<br />
160<br />
80<br />
750 1000<br />
E, mV<br />
1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.10. Differential pulse voltammograms of 4 μmol L -1 Duofilm sample with<br />
spikes of salicylic acid standard at CFE in Britton-Robinson buffer<br />
pH2.0, c (SA): (1) electrolyte, (2) expected 4 μmol L -1 salicylic acid in<br />
sample of Duofilm (3) 6 μmol L -1 spike, (4) 8 μmol L -1 spike and (5) 10<br />
μmol L -1 spike. Activation potential 2200 mV.<br />
The results confirmed the applicability of the method. The parameters of calibration<br />
curves in same medium are thus obtained and summarized in table 4.5.4.<br />
Table 4.5.4. The amount of Salicylic Acid determined by DPV in tablets<br />
S. no Name of Tablet<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Duofilm<br />
Saloxyl<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
Company Name<br />
Stiefel<br />
1<br />
Herbacos-bofarma<br />
Tablets<br />
(%)<br />
16.7<br />
4.5.7. Determination of Acetylsalicylic Acid from Different Drugs<br />
10<br />
Recovery ± stdev<br />
from 5 measur. (%)<br />
103 ± 3<br />
105 ± 1<br />
The developed method was tested for 4 µM Aspirin, Acypyrin, Acypyrin + C,<br />
Disprin, Acefein and Acefein + C drugs. The different concentration of hydrolyzed<br />
101
acetylsalicylic acid were spiked upto 10 µM for the determination of hydrolyzed<br />
acetylsalicylic at CFE. Good linear calibration curves were found as given in figure<br />
4.5.11.<br />
300<br />
I, nA<br />
200<br />
100<br />
750 1000<br />
E, mV<br />
1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.11. Differential pulse voltammograms of 4 μmol L -1 Aspirin sample with<br />
spikes of hydrolyzed acetylsalicylic acid standard at CFE in Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) electrolyte, (2) expected 4 μmol L -1<br />
salicylic acid in sample of Aspirin (3) 6 μmol L -1 spike, (4) 8 μmol L -1<br />
spike and (5) 10 μmol L -1 spike. Activation potential 2200 mV.<br />
The results confirmed the applicability of the method. The parameters of calibration<br />
curves in same medium are summarized in table 4.5.5.<br />
Table 4.5.5. The amount of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid determined by DPV in<br />
Tablets<br />
S. no Name of Tablet<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4<br />
5<br />
Aspirin<br />
Acylpyrin<br />
Acylpyrin + C<br />
Disprin<br />
Acifein<br />
Company Name<br />
Bayer<br />
Herbacos-bofarma<br />
Herbacos-bofarma<br />
Reckitt Benckiser<br />
Herbacos-bofarma<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
Tablets<br />
(mg)<br />
500<br />
500<br />
320<br />
300<br />
250<br />
Recovery ± stdev<br />
from 5 measur. (%)<br />
106 ± 2<br />
106 ± 2<br />
95 ± 1<br />
101 ± 3<br />
100 ± 2<br />
102
4.5.8. Determination of Salicylic Acid in Urine Samples at CFE<br />
The proposed method was also applied to test urine samples for the determination of<br />
salicylic acid at CFE. The linear calibration curves were obtained after the spiked<br />
0.1ml urine samples in ranges from 2 µM to 100 µM concentration of salicylic acid<br />
(see fig. 4.5.12 and fig 4.5.13 respectively).<br />
750<br />
I, nA<br />
500<br />
250<br />
600<br />
I , nA p<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0 50c, µM 100<br />
750 1000 E, mV 1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.12. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2) 20 (3) 40, (4) 60,<br />
(5) 80, (6) 100 μmol L -1 . Activation potential 2200 mV. Inset is<br />
corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
180<br />
I, nA<br />
120<br />
80<br />
I p , nA<br />
40<br />
0<br />
0 5 c, µM 10<br />
60<br />
750 1000<br />
E, mV<br />
1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.13. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(SA): (1) 0, (2) 2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8,<br />
(6) 10 μmol L -1 . Activation potential 2200 mV. Inset is<br />
corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
103
These results show the applicability of the method using DP voltammetry at CFE. The<br />
coefficient of regression (R) and limit of detection are obtained from different<br />
calibration curves are summarized in below table 4.5.6.<br />
Table 4.5.6. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the determination of<br />
Salicylic Acid in 0.1 ml urine samples in a Britton-Robinson buffer<br />
pH 2.0 using DPV at CFE with activation potential 2200 mV<br />
Concentration range<br />
[μ mol -1 L]<br />
20 – 100<br />
2 – 10<br />
Slope<br />
[nA μmol L -1 ]<br />
5.41<br />
8.12<br />
Intercept<br />
[nA]<br />
39.21<br />
–9.03<br />
R<br />
0.9886<br />
0.9976<br />
4.5.9. Determination of Acetylsalicylic Acid in Urine at CFE<br />
L O D<br />
[μ mol -1 L]<br />
–<br />
0.64<br />
Fig. 4.5.14 shows the determination of hydrolyzed acetylsalicylic acid in urine<br />
samples at CFE at pH value of 2 in BR buffer. The concentration of spiked<br />
acetylsalicylic acid in 0.1 ml urine samples was from 20-100µM. The lower<br />
concentration results of acetylsalicylic acid from 2-10µM is given in fig 4.5.15.<br />
104
450<br />
I, nA<br />
300<br />
150<br />
300<br />
I p , nA<br />
150<br />
0<br />
0 50c, µM 100<br />
750 1000<br />
E, mV<br />
1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.14. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0, (2) 20 (3) 40, (4) 60,<br />
(5) 80, (6) 100 μmol L -1 . Activation potential 2200 mV.<br />
Inset is corresponding calibration dependence.<br />
90<br />
I, nA<br />
60<br />
30<br />
40<br />
I , nA p<br />
20<br />
0<br />
0 5 c, µM 10<br />
750 1000<br />
E, mV<br />
1250<br />
Fig. 4.5.15. Differential pulse voltammograms of 0.1 ml urine sample at CFE in<br />
Britton-Robinson buffer pH 2.0, c(ASA): (1) 0, (2) 2 (3) 4, (4) 6, (5) 8,<br />
(6) 10 μmol L -1 . Activation potential 2200 mV. Inset is corresponding<br />
calibration dependence.<br />
These results show the applicability of the method using DP voltammetry at CFE. The<br />
coefficient of regression (R) and limit of detection are obtained from different<br />
calibration curves and summarized in table 4.5.7.<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
105
Table 4.5.7. Parameters of the calibration straight lines for the determination of<br />
hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic Acid in 0.1 ml urine sample in a Britton-<br />
Robinson buffer pH 2.0 using DPV at CFE with activation potential<br />
2200 mV<br />
Concentration range<br />
[μmol L -1 ]<br />
20 – 100<br />
2 – 10<br />
4.5.10. Interference Study<br />
Slope<br />
[nA μmol L -1 ]<br />
3.06<br />
4.51<br />
Intercept<br />
[nA]<br />
17.99<br />
– 3.92<br />
R<br />
0.9997<br />
0.9998<br />
L O D<br />
[μmol L -1 ]<br />
–<br />
0.71<br />
No interference was observed in hydrolyzed acetylsalicylic acid (see fig 4.5.16.) The<br />
concentration from 5 µM to 100 µM ascorbic acid added in 5 µM hydrolyzed<br />
acetylsalicylic acid at CFE was observed. The DP voltammogram of ascorbic acid<br />
show peak potential around 700 mV, while that of acetylsalicylic acid at 1100 to 1200<br />
mV. It means ascorbic acid does not interfere in the presence of hydrolyzed<br />
acetylsalicylic acid.<br />
450<br />
I, nA<br />
300<br />
150<br />
I p , nA<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
0 50c, µM 100<br />
200 700<br />
E, mV<br />
1200<br />
Fig. 4.5.16. Differential pulse voltammograms of hydrolyzed Acetylsalicylic acid 5<br />
μmol L -1 with ascorbic acid 5-100 μmol L -1 at CFE in Britton-Robinson<br />
buffer pH 2.0. Activation potential 2200 mV.<br />
106
4.6. Conclusions<br />
Various analytical methods were developed for the determination of pharmaceuticals<br />
such as paracetamol, diclofenac sodium, aspirin and brufen based on simplicity,<br />
sensitivity, selectivity, rapidity, low cost as well as environmental safety. For this purpose<br />
voltammetric and spectroscopic techniques were employed. The first proposed method<br />
based on uv-visible spectrophotometric technique for paracetamol determination<br />
possesses many advantages over other analytical methods due to its rapidity, lower cost,<br />
environmental safety and better sensitivity. The method can be successfully employed for<br />
paracetamol quantification in all types of pharmaceutical preparations and liquid samples,<br />
such as urine, serum, gastric juice, etc.<br />
In another approach method was developed for determining diclofenac sodium which is<br />
more superior to reported spectrophotometric methods due to its better sensitivity,<br />
simplicity, stability, economy, environmental safety, broader linear working and lower<br />
detection limits. Application of the developed method for quantification of diclofenac<br />
sodium in tablets with good recovery and lower standard deviation proved its suitability<br />
for analysis of diclofenac sodium in other pharmaceutical preparations. Its successful use<br />
in the determination of diclofenac sodium in urine and serum samples of patients makes<br />
this method as biomarker for identification and hence diagnosis of some diseases<br />
recognized by elevated or decreased level of diclofenac sodium. It may also be concluded<br />
that voltammetric determination of paracetamol using CFE is a suitable for the<br />
micromolar and submicromolar concentrations. The proposed methodology was<br />
successfully applied to the determination of paracetamol in four types of commercial<br />
107
drugs and for model human urine samples and satisfactory results were obtained.<br />
Preparation of the sample was easy and the method is less time-consuming and<br />
economical. Therefore, this quick and simple analytical procedure is suitable for practical<br />
applications. This method may be considered in lot of cases as a suitable alternative to<br />
existing more time-consuming and expensive chromatographic methods.<br />
The main goals achieved through this method include analytical simplicity, remarkable<br />
efficiency, better selectivity and lower cost for the quantification of Ibuprofen. Finally<br />
FTIR spectroscopic method has been developed using KBr windows for the<br />
determination of ibuprofen. A PLS model was successfully developed with the help of<br />
TQ analyst software. The developed method was easy to handle, cheapest and selective<br />
for the quantification of ibuprofen in pharmaceutical drugs and biological fluids i.e. urine<br />
samples.<br />
A suitable voltammetric method was developed using AgA-CFE for the determination of<br />
micromolar concentrations of Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) and salicylic acid. The limit<br />
of determination of Aspirin using DPV at AgA-CFE is lower due to efficient<br />
electrochemical activation; the AgA-CFE gives better reproducibility with excellent<br />
signal stability given by less passivation of electrode surface. Furthermore, fairly good<br />
reproducibility of surface renovation has been observed.<br />
108
References<br />
Abu, Q. A. W., Abou, D. M. B. (2001). A validated HPLC method for the determination of<br />
pyridostigmine bromide, acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid and caffeine in rat plasma<br />
and urine. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 26(5-6), 939-947.<br />
Afshari, J. T., Liu, T.-Z. (2001). Rapid spectrophotometric method for the quantitation of<br />
acetaminophen in serum. Anal. Chim. Acta 443(1), 165-169.<br />
Agatonovic, K. S., Beresford, R., Razzak, M. (2000). Determination of enantiomeric composition<br />
of ibuprofen in solid state mixtures of the two by DRIFT spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta<br />
417(1), 31-39.<br />
Al-Obaidy, S. S., Li Wan Po, A., McKiernan, P. J., Glasgow, J. F. T., Millership, J. (1995). Assay<br />
of paracetamol and its metabolites in urine, plasma and saliva of children with chroni<br />
liver disease. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 13(8), 1033-1039.<br />
Altair, M. B., Oliveira, H. P. M., Atvars, T. D. Z., Dias, I. L. T., Neto, G. O., Zagatto, E. A. G.,<br />
Kubota, L. T. (2005). Direct determination of paracetamol in powdered pharmaceutical<br />
samples by fluorescence spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta 539(1-2), 257-261.<br />
Al-Zoubi, N., Koundourellis, J. E., Malamataris, S. (2002). FT-IR and Raman spectroscopic<br />
methods for identification and quantitation of orthorhombic and monoclinic paracetamol<br />
in powder mixes. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 29, 459-467.<br />
Amann, G., Gübitz, G., Frei, R. W., Santi, W. (1980). Spectrofluorimetric determination of<br />
pharmaceutical compounds with the cerium(IV)--cerium(III) system. Anal. Chim. Acta<br />
116(1), 119-125.<br />
Ameer, B., Greenblatt, J. D., Divoll, M., Abernethy, R. D., Shargel, L. (1981). High-performance<br />
chromatographic determination of acetaminophen in plasma, single-dose<br />
pharmacokinetic studies. J. Chromatogr. 226, 224–230.<br />
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Drugs, (2001). Acetaminophen toxicity in<br />
children. Pediatrics 108, 1020–1024.<br />
AOAC (2002) International guidelines for single laboratory validation of chemical methods for<br />
dietary supplements and botanicals, Association of Official Analytical Chemists,<br />
Arlington, VA.<br />
Arancibia, J. A., Boldrini, M. A., Escandar, G. M. (2000). Spectrofluorimetric determination of<br />
diclofenac in the presence of [alpha]-cyclodextrin. Talanta 52(2), 261-268.<br />
Arancibia, J., Olivieri, A., Escandar, G. (2002). First- and second-order multivariate calibration<br />
applied to biological samples, determination of anti-inflammatories in serum and urine.<br />
Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 374(3), 451-459.<br />
Awtry, E. H., Loscalzo, J. (2000). Aspirin. Circulation 101(10), 1206-1218.<br />
109
Ayora, C. M. J., Pascual, R. M. I., Ruiz, M. A., Fernández-de, C. M. L., Molina, D. A. (2000).<br />
Fast determination of paracetamol by using a very simple photometric flow-through<br />
sensing device. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 22(1), 59-66.<br />
Bahram, B. (2008). Diclofenac sodium 0.1% ophthalmic solution, update on pharmacodynamics,<br />
clinical interest and safety profile. Expt. Rev. Ophth. 3(2), 139-148.<br />
Baranowska, I., Marta, K. (2009). The preliminary studies of electrochemical behavior of<br />
paracetamol and its metabolites on glassy carbon electrode by voltammetric methods.<br />
Electroanalysis 21(10), 1194 – 1199.<br />
Bari, S. B., Kaskhedikar, S. G. (1998). Simultaneous estimation of meclozine HCl and nicotinic<br />
acid from combined dosage form. Ind. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Sci. 60(2), 111-113.<br />
Bauza, R., Ríos, A., Valcárcel, M. (2001). Supercritical fluid extraction with in situ chiral<br />
derivatization for the enantiospecific determination of ibuprofen in urine samples. Anal.<br />
Chim. Acta 450(1-2), 1-11.<br />
Benschoten, J. J. V., Lewis, J. Y., Heineman, W. R., Roston, D. A., Kissinger, P. T. (1983).<br />
Cyclic Voltammetry Experiment. J. Chem. Ed. 60, 772-776.<br />
Bermejo, A. M., Lopez, R. M., Fernandez, P., Cruz, A. (1991). Application of second-derivative<br />
spectroscopy to the simultaneous identification and determination of plasma salicylate<br />
and paracetamol. Anal. Lett. 24, 1147–1157.<br />
Beun, G. D., Leunissen, K. M., Van, B., Vriesman, P. J., Van Hooff, J. P., Grave, W. (1987).<br />
Isolated minimal change nephropathy associated with diclofenac. Br. Med. J. 295(6591),<br />
182-183.<br />
Bidaut, R. M., Gabriel, S. E. (2001). Adverse gastrointestinal effects of NSAIDs, consequences<br />
and costs. Clin. Gastroenterol. 15(5), 739-753.<br />
Blanco, L. M., Lobo, C. M. J., Miranda, O. A., Tuñón B. P. (2003). Voltammetric response of<br />
diclofenac-molecularly imprinted film modified carbon electrodes. Anal. Bioanal.Chem.<br />
377(2), 257-261.<br />
Bojidarka, B. I. (2005). Monoclinic and orthorhombic polymorphs of paracetamol solid state<br />
linear dichroic infrared spectral analysis. J. Mol. Struct. 738, 233-238.<br />
Bojidarka, B. K. (2006), Polymorphs of aspirin solid state IR-LD spectroscopic and quantitative<br />
determination in solid mixtures. J. Mol. Struct. 4, 23-27.<br />
Boopathi, M., Won, M. S., Shim, Y. B. (2004). A sensor for acetaminophen in a blood medium<br />
using a Cu(II)-conducting polymer complex modified electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 512(2),<br />
191-197.<br />
Bosch, M. E., Sánchez, A. J. R., Rojas, F. S., Ojeda, C. B. (2006). Determination of paracetamol,<br />
Historical evolution. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 42(3), 291-321.<br />
110
Bouhsain, Z., Garrigues, S., Morales-Rubio, A., de la Guardia, M. (1996). Flow injection<br />
spectrophotometric determination of paracetamol in pharmaceuticals by means of on-line<br />
microwave-assisted hydrolysis and reaction with 8-hydroxyquinoline (8-quinolinol).<br />
Anal. Chim. Acta 330(1), 59-69.<br />
Brandt, K. (2003). Paracetamol in the treatment of osteoarthritis pain. Drugs 63(2), 23-41.<br />
British <strong>Ph</strong>armacopoeia (BP, 1980). HMSO, London p. 733.<br />
Bruna, C. L.¸ Roberta A. M., Romeu C., Rocha, F., Luiz, H. M., Orlando F. F. (2009).<br />
Simultaneous voltammetric determination of paracetamol and caffeine in pharmaceutical<br />
formulations using a boron-doped diamond electrode. Talanta 78, 748–752.<br />
Campanella, L., Tomassetti, M., Visco, G. (1990). Chemometric study and analytical enzymatic<br />
methods for diagnosis of cholesterol gallstones. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 8(3), 229-234.<br />
Campanero, M. A., Calahorra, B., GarcIa-Quétglas, E., López-Ocáriz, A., Honorato, J. (1999).<br />
Rapid liquid chromatographic assay for the determination of acetaminophen in plasma<br />
after propacetamol administration, application to pharmacokinetic studies. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm.<br />
Biomed. Anal. 20(1-2), 327-334.<br />
Carola, F. F., Cristina, S. O. (2002). Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of<br />
phenilpropanolamine HCL, caffeine and diazepam in tablets. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal.<br />
29(5),811-818.<br />
Carreira, L. A., Rizk, M., El-Shabrawy, Y., Zakhari, N. A., Toubar, S. S. (1995). Europium(III)<br />
ion probe spectrofluorometric determination of diclofenac sodium. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed.<br />
Anal. 13(11), 1331-1337.<br />
Cashman, J. N. (1996). The Mechanisms of action of NSAIDs in analgesia. Drugs. 52, 13-23.<br />
Catarino, R. I. L., Conceição, A. C. L., Garcia, M. B. Q., Gonçalves, M. L. S., Lima, J. L.<br />
F. C., Correia dos Santos, M. M. (2003). Flow amperometric determination of<br />
pharmaceuticals with on-line electrode surface renewal. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 33(4),<br />
571-580.<br />
Cervini, P., Cavalheiro, Ã. d. T. G. (2008). Determination of paracetamol at a graphitepolyurethane<br />
composite electrode as an amperometric flow detector. J. Braz. Chem. Soc.<br />
19, 836-841.<br />
Chenghang, W. C. L., Fang, C. W. (2006). Covalent Modification of Glassy Carbon Electrode<br />
with L-Cysteine for the Determination of Acetaminophen. Microchim. Acta 155, 365-<br />
371.<br />
Christian, G. D. (2004). Analytical Chemistry, John Wiley Sons, New York, p. 113.<br />
Chu, Q., Jiang, L., Tian, X., Ye, J. (2008). Rapid determination of acetaminophen and paminophenol<br />
in pharmaceutical formulations using miniaturized capillary electrophoresis<br />
with amperometric detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 606(2), 246-251.<br />
111
Clara, D. P., Di, P. R., Perrotta, C., Mazzon, E., Cattaneo, D., Trabucchi, E., Cuzzocrea, S.,<br />
Clementi, E. (2009). Ibuprofen arginine generates nitric oxide and has enhanced antiinflammatory<br />
effects. <strong>Ph</strong>armacol. Res. 60(4), 221-228.<br />
Clements, D., Williams, G. T., Rhodes, J. (1990). Colitis associated with ibuprofen. Biol. Med. J.<br />
301, 987.<br />
Codognoto, L., Machado, S. A. S., Avaca, L. A. (2003). Selective oxidation of pentachlorophenol<br />
on diamond electrodes. J. Appl. Electrochem. 33(10), 951-957.<br />
Colomina, P., Garcia, S. (1989). Agranulocytosis caused by diclofenac. Ann. <strong>Ph</strong>armacother.<br />
23(6), 507.<br />
Committee on Drug (2001). Acetaminophen Toxicity in Children. Pediatrics, 108(4), 1020-1024.<br />
Connors, K. A., Amidon, G. L., Kennon, L. (1979). Chem. Stab. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Wiley, New York, p.<br />
151.<br />
Costi, E. M., Goryacheva, I., Sicilia, M. D., Rubio, S., Pérez-Bendito, D. (2008). Supramolecular<br />
solid-phase extraction of ibuprofen and naproxen from sewage based on the formation of<br />
mixed supramolecular aggregates prior to their liquid chromatographic/photometric<br />
determination. J. Chromatogr. 1210(1), 1-7.<br />
Criado, A., Cárdenas, S., Gallego, M., Valcárcel, M. (2000). Continuous flow spectrophotometric<br />
determination of paracetamol in pharmaceuticals following continuous microwave<br />
assisted alkaline hydrolysis. Talanta 53(2), 417-423.<br />
Criado, A., Cardenas, S., Gallego, M., Valcarcel, M. (2000). Fast urinary screening for<br />
paracetamol using on-line microwave assisted hydrolysis and spectrophotometric<br />
detection. Analyst 125(6), 1179-1183.<br />
Damiani, P. C., Bearzotti, M., Cabezón, M. A. (2001). Spectrofluorometric determination of<br />
ibuprofen in pharmaceutical formulations. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 25(3-4), 679-683.<br />
Damiani, P. C., Ribone, M. Ã., Olivieri, A. C. (1995). Rapid Determination of Paracetamol in<br />
Blood Serum Samples by First-Derivative UV Absorption Spectroscopy. Anal. Lett.<br />
28(12), 2219 - 2226.<br />
Dargan P. I, Jones A, L. (2003). Management of paracetamol poisoning. Trends <strong>Ph</strong>armacol Sci.<br />
24(4), 154-7.<br />
Dasgupta, A., Kinnaman, G. (1993). Microwave-induced rapid hydrolysis of acetaminophen and<br />
its conjugates in urine for emergency toxicological screen. Clin. Chem. 39(11), 2349-<br />
2350.<br />
Davey, L., Naidoo, D. (1993). Urinary screen for acetaminophen (paracetamol) in the presence of<br />
N- acetylcysteine. Clin. Chem. 39(11), 2348-2349.<br />
De-Carvalho, R. M., Freire, R. S., Rath, S., Kubota, L. T. (2004). Effects of EDTA on signal<br />
stability during electrochemical detection of acetaminophen. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal.<br />
34(5), 871-878.<br />
112
De-Los, A., Oliva, M., Olsina, R. A., Masi, A. N. (2005). Selective spectrofluorimetric method<br />
for paracetamol determination through coumarinic compound formation. Talanta 66(1),<br />
229-235.<br />
De Oliveira, A. R. M., De Santana, F. J. M., Bonato, P. S. (2005). Stereoselective determination<br />
of the major ibuprofen metabolites in human urine by off-line coupling solid-phase<br />
microextraction and high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 538(1-<br />
2), 25-34.<br />
Dellinger, T. M. Livingston, H. M. (1998). Aspirin burn of the oral cavity. Ann <strong>Ph</strong>armacother.<br />
32(10), 1107.<br />
Dinç, E., Yücesoy, C., Onur, F. (2002). Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of<br />
mefenamic acid and paracetamol in a pharmaceutical preparation using ratio spectra<br />
derivative spectrophotometry and chemometric methods. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 28(6),<br />
1091-1100.<br />
Dirckx, K., Cabri, P., Merien, A., Galajdova, L., Gerris, J., Dhont, M., De Sutter, P. (2009). Does<br />
low-dose aspirin improve pregnancy rate in IVF/ICSI? A randomized double-blind<br />
placebo controlled trial. Hum. Reprod. 24(4), 856-860.<br />
Dom, Ã. R, A., Medina, R. l. L., P, M. H. (2000). Bioequivalence study of paracetamol tablets, in<br />
vitro-in vivo correlation. Drug Dev. Ind. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. 26(8), 821-828.<br />
Donald, M. R., Aspley, S., Daniels, S. E., Bandy, D. P. (2010). Comparison of the analgesic<br />
efficacy of concurrent ibuprofen and paracetamol with ibuprofen or paracetamol alone in<br />
the management of moderate to severe acute postoperative dental pain in adolescents and<br />
adults, A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose, twocenter,<br />
modified factorial study. Clin. Ther. 32(5), 882-895.<br />
Dreser, H. (1899). <strong>Ph</strong>armakologisches über aspirin (acetylsalicylsäure). Pfluger’s Arch. 76, 306-<br />
319.<br />
Dubach, U. C., Rosner, B., Starmer, T. (1991). An epidemiologic study of abuse of analgesic<br />
drugs. N. Engl. J. Med. 324(3), 155-160.<br />
Easwaramoorthy, D., Yu, Y.-C., Huang, H.-J. (2001). Chemiluminescence detection of<br />
paracetamol by a luminol-permanganate based reaction. Anal. Chim. Acta 439(1), 95-<br />
100.<br />
Eccles, M., Freemantle, N., Mason, J., the North of England Aspirin Guideline Development, G.<br />
(1998). North of England evidence based guideline development project, guideline on the<br />
use of aspirin as secondary prophylaxis for vascular disease in primary care. Biol. Med. J.<br />
316, 1303-1309.<br />
Edwardson, P. A. D., Nichols, J. D., Sugden, K. (1989). Application of a modified calorimetric<br />
enzyme assay to monitor plasma paracetamol levels following single oral doses to nonpatient<br />
volunteers. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 7(3), 287-293.<br />
113
El Haj, B. M., Al Ainri, A. M., Hassan, M. H., Bin Khadem, R. K., Marzouq, M. S. (1999). The<br />
GC/MS analysis of some commonly used non-steriodal anti-inflammatory drugs<br />
(NSAIDs) in pharmaceutical dosage forms and in urine. Forensic Sci. Int. 105(3), 141-<br />
153.<br />
Elen, R. S., Roberta, A. M., Romeu, C. R., Orlando, F. (2009). Square-wave voltammetric<br />
determination of acetylsalicylic acid in pharmaceutical formulations using a boron-doped<br />
diamond electrode without the need of previous alkaline hydrolysis step. J. Braz. Chem.<br />
Soc. 20, 360-366.<br />
Elwood, P. C. (2001) Aspirin, past, present and future. Clin. Med. 1, 132–37.<br />
Erdal, D., Kökdil, G., Onur, F. (2001). Derivative ratio spectra-zero crossing spectrophotometry<br />
and LC method applied to the quantitative determination of paracetamol,<br />
propyphenazone and caffeine in ternary mixtures. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 26(5-6), 769-<br />
778.<br />
Erica, F. B. F., Sartori, E. R. O., Medeiros, R. A., Rocha-Filho, R. C., Fatibello-Filho, O. (2010).<br />
Differential pulse voltammetric determination of sildenafil citrate (viagraâ) in<br />
pharmaceutical formulations using a boron-doped diamond electrode. Anal. Lett. 43(6),<br />
1046-1054.<br />
Erk, N., Özkan, Y., Banoglu, E., Özkan, S. A., Sentürk, Z. (2001). Simultaneous determination of<br />
paracetamol and methocarbamol in tablets by ratio spectra derivative spectrophotometry<br />
and LC. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 24(3), 469-475.<br />
Evans, D., Hart, J. P., Rees, G. (1991). Voltammetric behaviour of salicylic acid at a glassy<br />
carbon electrode and its determination in serum using liquid chromatography with<br />
amperometric detection. Analyst 116(8), 803-806.<br />
Fang, Y. Z., Long, D., Ye, J. (1997). Study of acetaminophen by parallel incident<br />
spectroelectrochemistry. Anal. Chim. Acta. 342(1), 13-21.<br />
Fanjul, B. P., Lamas, A. P. J., Hernández, S. D., Costa, G. A. (2009). Electrochemical study and<br />
flow injection analysis of paracetamol in pharmaceutical formulations based on screenprinted<br />
electrodes and carbon nanotubes. Anal. Chim. Acta. 638(2), 133-138.<br />
Farquhar, H., Stewart, A., Mitchell, E., Crane, J., Eyers, S., Weatherall, M., Beasley, R.<br />
(2009). The role of paracetamol in the pathogenesis of asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 40(1), 32-<br />
41.<br />
Farrar, H., Letzig, L., Gill, M. (2002). Validation of a liquid chromatographic method for the<br />
determination of ibuprofen in human plasma. J. Chromatogr. 780(2), 341-348.<br />
Felix, F. S., Brett, C. M. A., Angnes, L. (2007). Carbon film resistor electrode for amperometric<br />
determination of acetaminophen in pharmaceutical formulations. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed.<br />
Anal. 43(5), 1622-1627.<br />
Fernandez, C. M. L., Ortega, B. P., Molina, D. A. (1998). Sensitive and selective determination of<br />
diclofenac sodium in pharmaceutical preparations by solid phase ultraviolet<br />
absorptiometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 369(3), 263-268.<br />
114
Fernández, L. L., Blanco, L. M. C., Lobo, C. M. J., Miranda O. A. J., Tuñón, B. P. (2007).<br />
Determination of diclofenac in urine samples by molecularly-imprinted solid-phase<br />
extraction and adsorptive differential pulse voltammetry. Electroanalysis 19(15), 1555-<br />
1561.<br />
Fernando, A. H. N., Temple, R. M., Thomas, S., Lee, H. A. (1994). Renal failure after topical use<br />
of NSAIDs. Biol. Med. J, 308, 533.<br />
Fischer J., Vanourkova L., Danhel A., Vyskocil V., Cizek K., Barek J., Peckova K., Yosypchuk<br />
B., Navratil T., (2007). Voltammetric detrmination of nitrophenols at a silver solid<br />
amalgam electrode. int. j. electrochem. Sci. 2, 226.<br />
Franeta, J. T., Agbaba, D., Eric, S., Pavkov, S., Aleksic, M., Vladimirov, S. (2002). HPLC assay<br />
of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol, caffeine and phenobarbital in tablets. Il Farmaco<br />
57(9), 709-713.<br />
Freeland, G. R., Northington, R. S., Hedrich D. A., Walker B. R. (1988). Hepatic safety of two<br />
analgesics used over the counter, ibuprofen and aspirin. Clin. <strong>Ph</strong>armacol. Ther. 43, 473-<br />
479.<br />
Fujiwara, M., Chow, P. S., Ma, D. L., Braatz, R. D. (2002). Paracetamol crystallization using<br />
laser backscattering and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, metastability, agglomeration, and<br />
control. Cryst. Growth Des. 2(5), 363-370.<br />
Fung, Y. S., Luk, S. F. (1989). Determination of salicylic acid in pharmaceutical formulations and<br />
foods by differential-pulse voltammetry using a glassy carbon electrode. Analyst 114(8),<br />
943-945.<br />
Fuster, V.; Dyken, M. L.; Vokonas, P. S.; Hennekens, C. (1993). Aspirin as a therapeutic agent in<br />
cardiovascula disease. Circulation 87, 659-675.<br />
García G. E. B., Ruitenberg, A., Madretsma, G. S., Hintzen, R. Q. (2003). Hyponatraemic coma<br />
induced by desmopressin and ibuprofen in a woman with von Willebrand's disease.<br />
Haemophilia 9(2), 232-234.<br />
García, M. S., Albero, M. I., Sánchez, P. C., Molina, J. (1998). Flow-injection spectrophotometric<br />
determination of diclofenac sodium in pharmaceuticals and urine samples. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm.<br />
Biomed. Anal. 17(2), 267-273.<br />
Garrido, J. M. P. J.; Lima, J. L. F. C.; Matos, C. D. (2000). Flow injection determination of<br />
acetylsalicylic acid in pharmaceutical preparations with an amperometric detector.<br />
Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 65, 954-962.<br />
George, S., Rahi, A. H. (1995). Thrombocytopenia associated with diclofenac therapy. Am. J.<br />
Health Syst. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. 52(4), 420-421.<br />
Gikas, E., Parissi P. M., Kazanis, M., Vavagianis, A. (2003). BrMOZ<strong>Ph</strong>C, A novel coumarin type<br />
reagent for the fluorescent derivatisation of carboxylic acids. Anal. Chim. Acta 489(2),<br />
153-163.<br />
115
Gimenes, D. T., Santos, W. T. P. d., Munoz, R. A. A., Richter, E. M. (2010). Internal standard in<br />
flow injection analysis with amperometric detection. Electrochem. Commun. 12(2), 216-<br />
218.<br />
Glombitza, B. W., Schmidt, P. C. (1994). Comparison of three new spectrophotometric methods<br />
for simultaneous determination of aspirin and salicyclic acid in tablets without separation<br />
of pharmaceutical excipients. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Sci. 83(5), 751-757.<br />
Glówka, F. K., Karazniewicz, M. (2005). High performance capillary electrophoresis method for<br />
determination of ibuprofen enantiomers in human serum and urine. Anal. Chim. Acta<br />
540(1), 95-102.<br />
Goicoechea, A. G., De-Alda, M. J. L. p., Vila-Jato, J. L. (1995). A Validated high-performance<br />
liquid chromatographic method for the determination of paracetamol and its major<br />
metabolites in urine. J. Liq. Chromatogr. 18(16), 3257 - 3268.<br />
Golabi, S. M., Irannejad, L. (2005). Preparation and electrochemical study of fisetin modified<br />
glassy carbon electrode. Application to the determination of NADH and ascorbic acid.<br />
Electroanalysis 17(11), 985-996.<br />
Gonzalez, L., Yuln, G., Volonté, M. G. (1999). Determination of cyanocobalamin,<br />
betamethasone, and diclofenac sodium in pharmaceutical formulations, by high<br />
performance liquid chromatography. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 20(3), 487-492.<br />
Goodman, G. (2007). The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, Ninth ed., McGraw-Hill,<br />
Mexico.<br />
Gorton, L. (1995). Carbon paste electrodes modified with enzymes, tissues, and cells.<br />
Electroanalysis 7(1), 23-45.<br />
Goyal, R. N., Singh, S. P. (2006). Voltammetric determination of paracetamol at C60-modified<br />
glassy carbon electrode. Electrochim. Acta 51(15), 3008-3012.<br />
Goyal, R. N., Chatterjee, S., Agrawal, B. (2010). Electrochemical investigations of diclofenac at<br />
edge plane pyrolytic graphite electrode and its determination in human urine. Sens.<br />
Actuators B 145(2), 743-748.<br />
Goyal, R. N., Gupta, V. K., Oyama, M., Bachheti, N. (2005). Differential pulse voltammetric<br />
determination of paracetamol at nanogold modified indium tin oxide electrode.<br />
Electrochem. Commun. 7(8), 803-807.<br />
Gryfe, C. I., Rubenzahl, S. (1976). Agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia possibly due to<br />
ibuprofen. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 114, 877.<br />
Guidry, J. B., Ogburn, C. L., Griffin, F. M. (1979). Fatal autoimmune hemolytic anemia<br />
associated with ibuprofen. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 242(1), 68-69.<br />
Gupta, S., Tarkkila, P. (1998). Complications of opioids and nonsteroidal antiinflammatories in<br />
chronic nonmalignant pain. Tech. Reg. Anesth. Pain Manage. 2(3), 112-118.<br />
116
Hajjizadeh, M., Jabbari, A., Heli, H., Moosavi M. A. A., Haghgoo, S. (2007). Electrocatalytic<br />
oxidation of some anti-inflammatory drugs on a nickel hydroxide-modified nickel<br />
electrode. Electrochim. Acta 53(4), 1766-1774.<br />
Hammerschmidt, D. E. (1998). About the cover illustration, The first commercial bottle of<br />
aspirin, March 6, 1899. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 132(6), 556.<br />
Hammond, P. M., Scawen, M. D., Atkinson, T., Campbell, R. S., Price, C. P. (1984).<br />
Development of an enzyme-based assay for acetaminophen. Anal. Biochem. 143(1), 152-<br />
157.<br />
Hamoudová, R., Pospísilová, M. (2006). Determination of ibuprofen and flurbiprofen in<br />
pharmaceuticals by capillary zone electrophoresis. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 41(4), 1463-<br />
1467.<br />
Hansen, S. H., Jensen, M. E., Bjørnsdottir, I. (1998). Assay of acetylsalicylic acid and three of its<br />
metabolites in human plasma and urine using non-aqueous capillary electrophoresis with<br />
reversed electroosmotic flow. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 17(6-7), 1155-1160.<br />
Hardman, J. G, Limbird L. E., Goodman, A. G. (1996) Goodman Gilman’s. The <strong>Ph</strong>armacological<br />
Basis of Therapeutics, ninth ed., McGraw-Hill, Mexico, D.F., p. 669.<br />
Hardwick, J. C. H., Van Santen, M., van den Brink, G. R., van Deventer, S. J. H., Peppelenbosch,<br />
M. P. (2004). DNA array analysis of the effects of aspirin on colon cancer cells,<br />
involvement of Rac1. Carcinog. 25(7), 1293-1298.<br />
Hassan, S. M., Walash, M. I., El-Sayed, S. M., Abou A. O. (1981). Colorimetric determination of<br />
certain phenol derivatives in pharmaceutical preparations. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 64,<br />
1442–1453.<br />
Hassan, W. S. (2008). Determination of ibuprofen and paracetamol in binary mixture using<br />
cemometric-assisted spectrophotometric methods. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 5(8), 1005-1012.<br />
Hawkey, C. J. (1999) COX-2 inhibitors. The Lancet 353, 307–14.<br />
Hayllar, J., Bjarnason, I. (1995). NSAIDs, Cox-2 inhibitors, and the gut. The Lancet, 346, 521-<br />
522.<br />
Heitmeier, S., Blaschke, G. (1999). Direct determination of paracetamol and its metabolites in<br />
urine and serum by capillary electrophoresis with ultraviolet and mass spectrometric<br />
detection. J. Chromatogr. Biomed. Sci. Appl. 721(1), 93-108.<br />
Heli, H., Jabbari, A., Majdi, S., Mahjoub, M., Moosavi-Movahedi, A., Sheibani, S. (2009).<br />
Electrooxidation and determination of some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on<br />
nanoparticles of Ni–curcumin-complex-modified electrode. J. Solid State Electrochem.<br />
13(12), 1951-1958.<br />
Hennekens, C. H., Dyken, M. L., Fuster, V. (1997). Aspirin as a therapeutic agent in<br />
cardiovascular disease, a statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart<br />
association. Circulation 96(8), 2751-2753.<br />
117
Hergert, L. A., Escandar, G. M. (2003). Spectrofluorimetric study of the [beta]-cyclodextrinibuprofen<br />
complex and determination of ibuprofen in pharmaceutical preparations and<br />
serum. Talanta 60(2-3), 235-246.<br />
Hindson, B. J., Barnett, N. W. (2001). Analytical applications of acidic potassium permanganate<br />
as a chemiluminescence reagent. Anal. Chim. Acta 445(1), 1-19.<br />
Hoppmann, R. A., Peden, J. G., Ober, S. K. (1991). Central nervous system side effects of<br />
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aseptic meningitis, psychosis, and cognitive<br />
dysfunction. Arch. Int. Med. 151(7), 1309-1313.<br />
Horn, A. C., Jarrett, S. W. (1997). Ibuprofen-induced aseptic meningitis in rheumatoid arthritis.<br />
Ann <strong>Ph</strong>armacother, 31(9), 1009-1011.<br />
Houshmand, M., Jabbari, A., Heli, H., Hajjizadeh, M., Moosavi-Movahedi, A. (2008).<br />
Electrocatalytic oxidation of aspirin and acetaminophen on a cobalt hydroxide<br />
nanoparticles modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Solid State Electrochem. 12(9), 1117-<br />
1128.<br />
Inczedy, J., Lengyel, T., Ure, A. M., (1998) Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature (Definitive<br />
Rules, Blackwell Science, Santa Fe, NM, USA.<br />
Ishida, K., Sakazume, M., Ikegami, H., Doi, K. (1997). Enhanced nephrotoxicity of<br />
acetaminophen in fructose-induced hypertriglyceridemic rats, effect of partial<br />
hepatectomy. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 49(5), 321-327.<br />
Ishida, K., Ikegami, H., Doi, K. (1997). Enhanced nephrotoxicity of acetaminophen in fructoseinduced<br />
hypertriglyceridemic rats, contribution of oxidation and deacetylation of<br />
acetaminophen to an enhancement of nephrotoxicity. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 49, 313-319.<br />
Issa, Y. M., Zayed, S. I. M., Habib, I. H. I. (2010). Simultaneous determination of ibuprofen and<br />
paracetamol using derivatives of the ratio spectra method. Arabian J. Chem. (Available<br />
online).<br />
Jacoby, H. I. (2000). Gastrointestinal Agents. John Wiley Sons, Inc.<br />
Jafarian, M., Mahjani, M. G., Heli, H., Gobal, F., Heydarpoor, M. (2003). Electrocatalytic<br />
oxidation of methane at nickel hydroxide modified nickel electrode in alkaline solution.<br />
Electrochem. Commun. 5(2), 184-188.<br />
Jain, S. (1994). Ibuprofen-induced thrombocytopenia. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 48, 51.<br />
Jelena, P., Karljiković, R. K., Durić, Z., Jovanović, M., Ibrić, S. (2003). Development of the<br />
second-order derivative UV spectrophotometric method for direct determination of<br />
paracetamol in urine intended for biopharmaceutical characterisation of drug products.<br />
Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 24(7), 309-314.<br />
Jia, L., Zhang, X., Li, Q., Wang, S. (2007). Determination of acetaminophen by square wavevoltammetry<br />
at a gold electrode modified by 4-amino-2-mercaptopyrimidine selfassembled<br />
monolayers. J. Anal. Chem. 62(3), 266-269.<br />
118
Jin, W., Zhang, J. (2000). Determination of diclofenac sodium by capillary zone electrophoresis<br />
with electrochemical detection. J. Chromatogr. 868(1), 101-107.<br />
Jonkman, J. H. G., Schoenmaker, R., Holtkamp, A. H., Hempenius, J. (1985). Determination of<br />
ibuprofen in human plasma by solid phase extraction and reversed-phase highperformance<br />
liquid chromatography. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 3(5), 433-438.<br />
Jouzeau, J. Y., Terlain, B., Abid, A. (1997). Cyclooxygenase isoenzymes, how recent findings<br />
affect thinking about nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Drugs 53, 563–582.<br />
Julio, C. B., Guadalupe, P. C. (1995). Spectrophotometric determination of diclofenac sodium<br />
withmethylene-blue. Talanta 42(1), 105-108.<br />
Justiniani, F. R. (1986). Over-the-counter ibuprofen and nephrotic syndrome. Ann. Intern. Med.<br />
105(2), 303.<br />
Kachoosangi, R. T., Wildgoose, G. G., Compton, R. G. (2008). Sensitive adsorptive stripping<br />
voltammetric determination of paracetamol at multiwalled carbon nanotube modified<br />
basal plane pyrolytic graphite electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 618(1), 54-60.<br />
Kalcher, K., Schach, K., Švancara, I., Vytras, K., Alemu, H. (1998). Recent progresses in the<br />
development of electrochemical carbon paste sensors. Sci. Pap. Univ. Pardubice, Ser. A<br />
3, 41-56.<br />
Kalcher, K., Wang, J., Kauffmann, J. M., Svancara, I., Vytras, K., Neuhold, C., Zhongping, Y.<br />
(1995). Sensors based on carbon paste in electrochemical analysis, a review with<br />
particular emphasis on the period 1990-1993. Ann. Intern. Med. 7, 5-22.<br />
Kalcher, K. (1990). Chemically modified carbon paste electrodes in voltammetric analysis.<br />
Electroanalysis 2(6), 419-433.<br />
Kang, S. H., Chang, S. Y., Do, K.-C., Chi, S.-C., Doo Soo, C. (1998). High-performance liquid<br />
chromatography with a column-switching system and capillary electrophoresis for the<br />
determination of ibuprofen in plasma. J. Chromatogr. B 712(1-2), 153-160.<br />
Kelloff, G. J., Schilsky, R. L., Alberts, D. S., Day, R. W., Guyton, K. Z., Pearce, H. L., Peck, J.<br />
C., <strong>Ph</strong>illips, R., Sigman, C. C. (2004). Colorectal adenomas, A prototype for the use of<br />
surrogate end points in the development of cancer prevention drugs. Colorectal<br />
Adenomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 10(11), 3908-3918.<br />
Khazan, U., Toth, M., Mutgi, A. (1990). Diclofenac sodium and bruising. Ann. Intern. Med. 112,<br />
472–473.<br />
Khoshayand, M. R., Abdollahi, H., Shariatpanahi, M., Saadatfard, A., Mohammadi, A. (2008).<br />
Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of paracetamol, ibuprofen and caffeine<br />
in pharmaceuticals by chemometric methods. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 70(3), 491-499.<br />
Kibbey, C. E., Park, S. B., DeAdwyler, G., Meyerhoff, M. E. (1992). Further studies on the<br />
potentiometric salicylate response of polymeric membranes doped with tin(IV)tetraphenylporphyrins.<br />
J. Electroanal. Chem. 335(1-2), 135-149.<br />
119
Kim, H. L., Kovacs, M. J. (1995). Diclofenac-associated thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. Ann.<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>armacother. 713–715.<br />
Klimes, J., Sochor, J., Dolezal, P., Körner, J. (2001). HPLC evaluation of diclofenac in<br />
transdermal therapeutic preparations. Int. J. <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutics 217(1-2), 153-160.<br />
Knochen, M., Giglio, J., Reis, B. F. (2003). Flow-injection spectrophotometric determination of<br />
paracetamol in tablets and oral solutions. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 33(2), 191-197.<br />
Kocao, Ä., Ÿlu, S., Karan, A., Berkan, T., BaÅŸdemir, G. (1997). Acute acetaminophen<br />
nephrotoxicity and urinary gamma-glutamyl transferase activity in rats. Drug Metabol.<br />
Drug Interact.14(1), 47-54.<br />
Koleva, T. (2006). Solid-state IR–LD spectroscopic and theoretical analysis of argininecontaining<br />
peptides. Biopolymers 83, 39-45.<br />
Koukli, I. I., Calokerinos, A. C., Hadjiioannou, T. P. (1989). Continuous-flow<br />
chemiluminescence determination of acetaminophen by reduction of cerium(IV). Analyst<br />
114(6), 711-714.<br />
Koupparis, M. A., Anagnostopoulou, P. I. (1988). Automated flow injection determination of<br />
salicylates using Trinder reaction for clinical analysis, assays and dissolution studies of<br />
formulations. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 6(1), 35-46.<br />
Kowal, A., Port, S. N., Nichols, R. J. (1997). Nickel hydroxide electrocatalysts for alcohol<br />
oxidation reactions, An evaluation by infrared spectroscopy and electrochemical<br />
methods. Catal. Today, 38(4), 483-492.<br />
Kubota, L. T., Fernandes, J. C. B., RoverJr, L., Neto, G. d. O. (1999). Determination of<br />
acetylsalicylic acid by FIA-potentiometric system in drugs after on-line hydrolysis.<br />
Talanta 50(3), 661-667.<br />
Kupferwasser, L. I., Yeaman, M. R., Nast, C. C., Kupferwasser, D., Xiong, Y.-Q., Palma, M.,<br />
Cheung, A. L., Bayer, A. S. (2003). Salicylic acid attenuates virulence in endovascular<br />
infections by targeting global regulatory pathways in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin.<br />
Invest. 112(2), 222-233.<br />
Lala, L. G., D'Mello, P. M., Naik, S. R. (2002). HPTLC determination of diclofenac sodium from<br />
serum. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 29(3), 539-544.<br />
Lau, G. S. N., Critchley, J. A. J. H. (1994). The estimation of paracetamol and its major<br />
metabolites in both plasma and urine by a single high-performance liquid<br />
chromatography assay. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 12(12), 1563-1572.<br />
Lewis, J. H. Hepatic toxicity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. (1984). Clin. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. 3,<br />
128–38.<br />
Lo, L. Y., Bye, A. (1979). Rapid determination of paracetamol in plasma by reversed-phase highperformance<br />
liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 173(1), 198-201.<br />
120
Lobo, M. J., Miranda, A. J., Tuñón, P. (1997). Amperometric biosensors based on NAD(P)dependent<br />
dehydrogenase enzymes. Electroanalysis 9(3), 191-202.<br />
Loh, H. C., Ahmad, M., Taib, M. N. (2005). A novel salicylic acid optical fibre probe fabrication.<br />
Sens. Actuators B. 107(1), 59-63.<br />
Lohmann, W. Karst U. (2006). Simulation of the detoxification of paracetamol using on-line<br />
electrochemistry/liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 386,<br />
1701-1708.<br />
López, A., Linares, M., Sánchez, H., Blanquer, A. (1995). Autoimmune hemolytic anemia<br />
induced by diclofenac. Ann <strong>Ph</strong>armacother. 29, 787.<br />
López, C. G., Ostra, M., Ubide, C. (2002). The acetylsalicylic acid-bromine system for<br />
multicomponent kinetic determinations. Anal. Bioanal.Chem. 374(5), 915-922.<br />
Lou, H., Yuan, H., Ruan, Z., Jiang, B. (2010). Simultaneous determination of paracetamol,<br />
pseudoephedrine, dextrophan and chlorpheniramine in human plasma by liquid<br />
chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. 878(7-8), 682-688.<br />
Love, L. J. C., Zibas, S., Noroski, J., Arunyanart, M. (1985). Direct injection of untreated serum<br />
using nonionic and ionic micellar liquid chromatography for determination of drugs. J.<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 3(6), 511-521.<br />
Lu, T. L., Tsai, Y. C. (2010). Electrocatalytic oxidation of acetylsalicylic acid at multiwalled<br />
carbon nanotube-alumina-coated silica nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrodes.<br />
Sens. Acuators B. 148(2), 590-594.<br />
Majdi, S., Jabbari, A., Heli, H. (2007). A study of the electrocatalytic oxidation of aspirin on a<br />
nickel hydroxide-modified nickel electrode. J. Solid State Electrochem. 11, 601-607.<br />
Mamus, S. W., Burton, J. D., Groat, J. D., Schulte, D. A., Lobell, M., Zanjani, E. D. (1986).<br />
Ibuprofen-Associated Pure White-Cell Aplasia. N. Engl. J. Med. 314(10), 624-625.<br />
Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Willett, W. C., Rosner, B., Speizer, F. E.,<br />
Hennekens, C. H. (1991). A prospective study of aspirin use and primary prevention of<br />
cardiovascular disease in women. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 266(4), 521-527.<br />
Marnett, L. J. (1992). Aspirin and the potential role of prostaglandins in colon cancer. Cancer<br />
Research 52(20), 5575-5589.<br />
Martin, F. L., McLean, A. E. M. (1998). Comparison of paracetamol-induced hepatotoxicity in<br />
the rat in vivo with progression of cell injury in vitro in rat liver slices. Drug and Chem.<br />
Toxicol. 21(4), 477-494.<br />
Martinez, C. J., Gomez, B. C. (1990). Flow-injection spectrofluorimetric determination of<br />
paracetamol. Anal. Chim. Acta 231, 259-264.<br />
121
Martos, N. R., Daaz, A. M., Navalan, A., Capitain, V. L. F. (2001). Spectrofluorimetric<br />
determination of acetylsalicylic acid and codeine mixtures in pharmaceuticals. Anal. Lett.<br />
34(4), 579-595.<br />
Matias, F. A. A., Vila, M. M. D. C., Tubino, M. (2004). Quantitative reflectance spot test for the<br />
determination of acetylsalicylic acid in pharmaceutical preparations. J. Braz. Chem. Soc.<br />
15, 327-330.<br />
Matin, A. A., Farajzadeh, M. A., Jouyban, A. (2005). A simple spectrophotometric method for<br />
determination of sodium diclofenac in pharmaceutical formulations. Il Farmaco 60(10),<br />
855-858.<br />
Mattok, G. L., McGilveray, I. J., Mainville, C. A. (1971). Acetaminophen III, Dissolution studies<br />
of commercial tablets of acetaminophen and comparison with in vivo absorption<br />
parameters. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Sci. 60(4), 561-564.<br />
Mazurek, S., Szostak, R. (2006). Quantitative determination of diclofenac sodium and<br />
aminophylline in injection solutions by FT-Raman spectroscopy. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed.<br />
Anal. 40(5), 1235-1242.<br />
Mazurek, S., Szostak, R. (2008). Quantitative determination of diclofenac sodium in solid dosage<br />
forms by FT-Raman spectroscopy. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 48(3), 814-821.<br />
McGregor, A. H., More, L. J., Simpson, K. J., Harrison, D. J. (2003). Liver death and<br />
regeneration in paracetamol toxicity. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 22(4), 221-227.<br />
Merckle, P., Kovar, K. A. (1998). Assay of effervescent tablets by near-infrared spectroscopy in<br />
transmittance and reflectance mode, acetylsalicylic acid in mono and combination<br />
formulations. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 17(3), 365-374.<br />
Miles, F. K., Kamath, R., Dorney, S. F., Gaskin, K. J., O'Loughlin, E. V. (1999). Accidental<br />
paracetamol overdosing and fulminant hepatic failure in children. Med. J. Aust. 1. 171(9),<br />
472-475.<br />
Miner, D. J., Rice, J. R., Riggin, R. M., Kissinger, P. T. (1981). Voltammetry of acetaminophen<br />
[paracetamol] and its metabolites. Anal. Chem. 53(14), 2258-2263.<br />
Moore, T. J., Joseph, M. J., Allen, B. W., Coury, L. A. (1995). Enzymically amplified<br />
voltammetric sensor for microliter sample volumes of salicylate. Ana.l Chem. 67(11),<br />
1896-1902.<br />
Moreira, A. B., Dias, I. L. T., Neto, G. O., Zagatto, E. A. G., Kubota, L. T. (2004). Solid-phase<br />
fluorescence spectroscopy for the determination of acetylsalicylic acid in powdered<br />
pharmaceutical samples. Anal. Chim. Acta. 523(1), 49-52.<br />
Moreira, A. B., Oliveira, H. P. M., Atvars, T. D. Z., Dias, I. L. T., Neto, G. O., Zagatto, E. A. G.,<br />
Kubota, L. T. (2005). Direct determination of paracetamol in powdered pharmaceutical<br />
samples by fluorescence spectroscopy. Anal. Chim. Acta. 539(1-2), 257-261.<br />
122
Mugford, C. A., Tarloff, J. B. (1997). The contribution of oxidation and deacetylation to<br />
acetaminophen nephrotoxicity in female Sprague-Dawley rats. Toxicol. Letters 93(1), 15-<br />
22.<br />
Muralidharan, B., Gopu, G., Vedhi, C., Manisankar, P. (2008). Voltammetric determination of<br />
analgesics using a montmorillonite modified electrode. App. Clay Science 42(1-2), 206-<br />
213.<br />
Murfin, J. W., Wragg, J. S. (1972). A colorimetric method for the determination of phenacetin<br />
and paracetamol. Part II. A manual procedure for the determination of phenacetin or<br />
paracetamol in formulations. Analyst 97(1157), 670-675.<br />
Murillo, J. A., Garcia, L. F. (1996). Application of first derivative fluorescence spectrometry to<br />
the simultaneous determination of paracetamol and salicylamide in pharmaceuticals.<br />
Anal. Lett., 29(3), 423-438.<br />
Nada, F. A., Maher, F. E. (2009). Poly (3-methylthiophene)/palladium sub-micro-modified sensor<br />
electrode. Part II, Voltammetric and EIS studies, and analysis of catecholamine<br />
neurotransmitters, ascorbic acid and acetaminophen. Talanta 79. 639–647.<br />
Nagasawa, H. T., Shoeman, D. W., Cohen, J. F., Rathbun, W. B. (1996). Protection against<br />
acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity by L-CySSME and its N-acetyl and ethyl ester<br />
derivatives. J. Biochem. Toxicol. 11(6), 289-295.<br />
Nakamura, H., Tamura, Z. (1980). Fluorimetric determination of secondary amines based on their<br />
reaction with fluorescamine. Anal. Chem. 52(13), 2087-2092.<br />
Nanda, A., Ola, M., Bhaskar, R., Sharma, C. K., Nayak, S. (2010). Formulation and evaluation of<br />
an effervescent, gastroretentive drug-delivery system. (Peer reviewed) <strong>Ph</strong>armaceut.<br />
Technol.10(34) 60-71.<br />
Nikles, C. J., Yelland, M., Del Mar, C., Wilkinson, D. (2005). The role of paracetamol in chronic<br />
pain, an evidence-based approach. American J. Therapeutics 12(1), 80-91.<br />
Nogowska, M., Muszalska, I., Zajac, M. (1999). Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination<br />
of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine in pharmaceutical preparations. Chem<br />
Anal. 44, 1041.<br />
Osteryoung, J. G., Osteryoung, R. A. (1985). Square wave voltammetry. Anal. Chem .57(1),<br />
101A-110A.<br />
Palabiyik, I. M., Dinç, E., Onur, F. (2004). Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of<br />
pseudoephedrine hydrochloride and ibuprofen in a pharmaceutical preparation using ratio<br />
spectra derivative spectrophotometry and multivariate calibration techniques. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm.<br />
Biomed. Anal. 34(3), 473-483.<br />
Palomo, M. E., Ballesteros, M. P., Frutos, P. (1999). Analysis of diclofenac sodium and<br />
derivatives. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 21 (1) 83-94.<br />
Parojčić, J., Karljiković R. K., Durić, Z., Jovanović, M., Ibrić, S. (2003). Development of the<br />
second-order derivative UV spectrophotometric method for direct determination of<br />
123
paracetamol in urine intended for biopharmaceutical characterization of drug products.<br />
Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 24(7), 309-314.<br />
Parviz, N., Faezeh, D., Mohammad, R. G., Parandis, D. (2009). sprosium Nanowire Modified<br />
Carbon Paste Electrode for the Simultaneous Determination of Naproxen and<br />
Paracetamol, Application in <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Formulation and Biological Fluid. Int. J.<br />
Electrochem. Sci. 4, 373 – 1386.<br />
Pasekova, H., Sales, M. G., Montenegro, M. C., Araújo, A. N., Polásek, M. (2001).<br />
Potentiometric determination of acetylsalicylic acid by sequential injection analysis (SIA)<br />
using a tubular salicylate-selective electrode. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 24(5-6), 1027-<br />
1036.<br />
Patel, F. The fatal paracetamol dosage-how low can you go? (1992), Med Sci Law 32,303–310.<br />
Patricia, C., Damiani, Mariela B., Miguel, A., Cabezón, Alejandro C. O. (1999).<br />
Spectrofluorometric determination of diclofenac in tablets and ointments. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm.<br />
Biomed.Anal.203,587-590.<br />
Patrono, C. (1994). Aspirin as an antiplatelet drug. New Engl. J. Med. 330, 1287-1294.<br />
Payán, M. R., López, M. Á. B., Fernández-Torres, R., Bernal, J. L. P., Mochón, M. C. (2009).<br />
HPLC determination of ibuprofen, diclofenac and salicylic acid using hollow fiber-based<br />
liquid phase microextraction (HF-LPME). Anal. Chim. Acta. 653(2), 184-190.<br />
Pedrosa, V. A., Lowinsohn, D., Bertotti, M. (2006). FIA Determination of Paracetamol in<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Drugs by Using Gold Electrodes Modified with a 3-Mercaptopropionic<br />
Acid Monolayer. Electroanalysis 18(9), 931-934.<br />
Pedrosa, V. D. A., Codognoto, L. C., Avaca, L. A. (2003). Determinação voltamétrica de<br />
4-clorofenol sobre o eletrodo de diamante dopado com boro utilizando a voltametria de<br />
onda quadrada. QuÃmica Nova, 26, 844-849.<br />
Pegon, Y., Vallon, J. J. (1981). Extraction du paracetamol par relargage de solvant et application<br />
au dosage par chromatographie en phase gazeuse dans le plasma , enA rapid extraction<br />
technique for the determination of paracetamol in plasma by gas chromatography. Anal.<br />
Chim. Acta. 130(2), 405-408.<br />
Pereira, A. V., Aniceto, C., Fatibello, F. O. (1998). Flow injection spectrophotometric<br />
determination of acetylsalicylic acid in tablets after on-line microwave-assisted alkaline<br />
hydrolysis. Analyst 123, 1011–1015.<br />
Pérez, R. T., MartInez, L. C., Sanz, A., San Miguel, M. T. (1997). Flow extraction<br />
spectrophotometric method for the determination of diclofenac sodium in pharmaceutical<br />
preparations. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 16(2), 249-254.<br />
Perneger, T. V., Whelton, P. K., Klag, M. J. (1994). Risk of kidney failure associated with the use<br />
of acetaminophen, aspirin, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. N. Engl. J. Med.<br />
331(25), 1675-1679.<br />
124
Pimenta, A. M., Araújo, A. N., Montenegro, M. C. B. S. M. (2002). Simultaneous potentiometric<br />
and fluorimetric determination of diclofenac in a sequential injection analysis system.<br />
Anal. Chim. Acta. 470(2), 185-194.<br />
Pirker, R., Huck, C. W., Popp, M., Bonn, G. K. (2004). Simultaneous determination of gentisic,<br />
salicyluric and salicylic acid in human plasma using solid-phase extraction, liquid<br />
chromatography and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. 809(2),<br />
257-264.<br />
Piro, B., Do, V.-A., Le, L. A., Hedayatullah, M., <strong>Ph</strong>am, M. C. (2000). Electrosynthesis of a new<br />
enzyme-modified electrode for the amperometric detection of glucose. J. Electroanal.<br />
Chem. 486(2), 133-140.<br />
Pirola, R., Bareggi, S. R., De Benedittis, G. (1998). Determination of acetylsalicylic acid and<br />
salicylic acid in skin and plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography. J.<br />
Chromatogr. B 705(2), 309-315.<br />
Pournaghi, M. H., Sabzi, R. E. (2004). Electrocatalytic oxidation of sulfite on a cobalt<br />
pentacyanonitrosylferrate film modified glassy carbon electrode. Electroanalysis 16(10),<br />
860-865.<br />
Prasek, J., Hubalek, J., Adamek, M., Jasek, O., Zajickova, L. (2007). Nanopatterned working<br />
electrode with carbon nanotubes improving electrochemical sensors. J. Nanoeng.<br />
Nanosyst. 221(3), 115-119.<br />
Prescott, L. F. (2001). Paracetamol overdose. In Paracetamol (Acetaminophen) – A Critical<br />
Bibliographic Review. 2nd Edition 527 – 624. London, Taylor Francis Ltd.<br />
Price, A. J., Obeid, D. (1989). Spontaneous non-gastrointestinal bleeding associated with<br />
diclofenac. Lancet. 2, 23-30.<br />
Pulgarín, J. A. M., Bermejo, L. F. G. (1996). Flow-injection stopped-flow spectrofluorimetric<br />
kinetic determination of paracetamol based on its oxidation reaction by<br />
hexacyanoferrate(III). Anal. Chim. Acta 333(1-2), 59-69.<br />
Purcell, P., Henry, D., Melville, G. (1991). Diclofenac hepatitis. Gut, 32(11), 1381-1385.<br />
Quintino, M. S. M., Corbo, D., Bertotti, M., Angnes, L. (2002). Amperometric determination of<br />
acetylsalicylic acid in drugs by batch injection analysis at a copper electrode in alkaline<br />
solutions. Talanta 58(5), 943-949.<br />
Quintino, M. S. M., Angnes, L. (2004). Bia-amperometric quantification of salbutamol in<br />
pharmaceutical products. Talanta 62(2), 231-236.<br />
Ragno, G., Ioele, G., Risoli, A. (2004). Multivariate calibration techniques applied to the<br />
spectrophotometric analysis of one-to-four component systems. Anal. Chim. Acta 512(1),<br />
173-180.<br />
Ravi, S., Keat, A. C., Keat, E. C. (1986). Colitis caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.<br />
Postgrad. Med. J. 62(730), 773-776.<br />
125
Ray, J. E., Stove, J., Williams, K. M. (1987). A rapid urinary screen for acetaminophen modified<br />
to avoid false- negative results. Clin Chem, 33(5), 718.<br />
Richardson, C., Emery, P. (1996). The clinical implications of inhibition of the inducible form of<br />
cyclo-oxygenase. Drug Safety 15, 249–60.<br />
Riddhi, G., Rajashree, M., Pankaj, S. (2010). Development and validation of spectrophotometric<br />
methods for simultaneous estimation of ibuprofen and paracetamol in soft gelatin capsule<br />
by simultaneous equation method. Inter. J. Chem.Tech. Res. 2, 1881-1885.<br />
Schootstra, R., Yska, J. P. (2008). Compounding medication for digestive decontamination,<br />
pharmaceutical aspects. Selective Digestive Tract Decontamination in Intensive Care<br />
Medicine, a Practical Guide to Controlling Infection (73-87), Springer Milan.<br />
Robards, K., Worsfold, P. J. (1992). Analytical applications of liquid-phase chemiluminescence.<br />
Anal. Chim. Acta 266(2), 147-173.<br />
Rodriguez, J. A., Barrado, E., Castrillejo, Y., Santos, J. R., Lima, J. L. F. C. (2007). Validation of<br />
a tubular bismuth film amperometric detector, Determination of diclofenac sodium by<br />
multisyringe flow injection analysis. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 45(1), 47-53.<br />
Rover, J. L., De-oliveira, N. G., Roberto, F. J., Tatsuo, K. L. (2000). Determination of salicylate<br />
in blood serum using an amperometric biosensor based on salicylate hydroxylase<br />
immobilized in a polypyrrole-glutaraldehyde matrix. Talanta 51(3), 547-557.<br />
Rover, L., Garcia, C. A. B., Neto, G. d. O., Kubota, L. T., Galembeck, F. (1998). Acetylsalicylic<br />
acid determination in pharmaceutical samples by FIA-potentiometry using a salicylatesensitive<br />
tubular electrode with an ethylene-vinyl acetate membrane. Anal. Chim. Acta.<br />
366(1-3), 103-109.<br />
Ruengsitagoon, W., Liawruangrath, S., Townshend, A. (2006). Flow injection<br />
chemiluminescence determination of paracetamol. Talanta 69(4), 976-983.<br />
Ruiz, M. A., Fernández-de, C. M. L., Ortega, B. P., Molina, D. A. (2001). Flow-through UV<br />
spectrophotometric sensor for determination of (acetyl)salicylic acid in pharmaceutical<br />
preparations. Int. J. <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutics 216(1-2), 95-104.<br />
Russeau, W., Mitchell, J., Tetteh, J., Lane, M. E., Hadgraft, J. (2009). Investigation of the<br />
permeation of model formulations and a commercial ibuprofen formulation in Carbosil®<br />
and human skin using ATR-FTIR and multivariate spectral analysis. Int. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm.<br />
374(1-2), 17-25.<br />
Ryley, N. G, (1989). Diclofenac associated hepatitis. Gut. 30, A708.<br />
Sádecká, J., Cakrt, M., Hercegová, A., Polonský, J., Skacáni, I. (2001). Determination of<br />
ibuprofen and naproxen in tablets. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 25(5-6), 881-891.<br />
Sadik, O. A., Wallace, G. G. (1993). Pulse damperometric detection of proteins using antibody<br />
containing conducting polymers. Anal. Chim. Acta 279(2), 209-212.<br />
126
Safavi, A., Maleki, N., Moradlou, O. (2008). A selective and sensitive method for simultaneous<br />
determination of traces of paracetamol and p-aminophenol in pharmaceuticals using<br />
carbon ionic liquid electrode. Electroanalysis 20(19), 2158-2162.<br />
Sandulescu, R., Mirel, S., Oprean, R. (2000). The development of spectrophotometric and<br />
electroanalytical methods for ascorbic acid and acetaminophen and their applications in<br />
the analysis of effervescent dosage forms. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 23(1), 77-87.<br />
Santhosh Nair, S., John, S. A., Sagara, T. (2009). Simultaneous determination of paracetamol and<br />
ascorbic acid using tetraoctylammonium bromide capped gold nanoparticles immobilized<br />
on 1,6-hexanedithiol modified Au electrode. Electrochim. Acta 54(27), 6837-6843.<br />
Santini, O., J. E. de Oliveira, H. R., Pezza, L. (2006). A new potentiometric ibuprofenate ion<br />
sensor immobilized in a graphite matrix for determination of ibuprofen in tablets,<br />
Microchem. J. 84, 44–49.<br />
Santos, W. D. R., P. R. Lima, C. R. Tarley, L. T. Kubota, (2007). A catalytically active<br />
molecularly imprinted polymer that mimics peroxidase based on hemin, application to<br />
the determination of p –aminophenol. Anal. and Bioanal. Chem. 389, 1919.<br />
Santos, W. T. P., Dos, E. G. N., de Almeida, H. E. A., Ferreira, D. T., Gimenes, E. M. R. (2008).<br />
Simultaneous flow injection analysis of paracetamol and ascorbic acid with multiple<br />
pulse amperometric detection. Electroanalysis 20, 1878-1883.<br />
Saraswathyamma, B., Grzybowska, I., Orlewska, C., Radecki, J., Dehaen, W., Kumar, K. G.,<br />
Radecka, H. (2008). Electroactive dipyrromethene-Cu(II) monolayers deposited onto<br />
gold electrodes for voltammetric determination of paracetamol. Electroanalysis 20(21),<br />
2317-2323.<br />
Šatínský, D., Neto, I., Solich, P., Sklenářová, H., Conceição, M., Montenegro, B. S. M., Araújo,<br />
A. N. (2004). Sequential injection chromatographic determination of paracetamol,<br />
caffeine, and acetylsalicylic acid in pharmaceutical tablets. J. Separation Sci. 27(7-8),<br />
529-536.<br />
Save, T. K., Parmar, D. V., Devarajan, P. V. (1997). High-performance thin-layer<br />
chromatographic determination of ibuprofen in plasma. J. Chromatogr. B. 690(1-2), 315-<br />
319.<br />
Schirmer, R.E., (1991). Modern Methods of <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Analysis, vol. I, Second ed., CRS<br />
Press, New York, 213.<br />
Seitz, W., Knox, R., Van, D. C. (1981). Chemiluminescence and bioluminescence analysis,<br />
fundamentals and biomedical applications. Rev. Anal. Chem. 13,1-58.<br />
Sena, M. M., Poppi, R. J. (2004). N-way PLS applied to simultaneous spectrophotometric<br />
determination of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol and caffeine. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal.<br />
34(1), 27-34.<br />
Sena, M. M., Fernandes, J. C. B., Rover, L., Poppi, R. J., Kubota, L. T. (2000). Application of<br />
two- and three-way chemometric methods in the study of acetylsalicylic acid and<br />
127
ascorbic acid mixtures using ultraviolet spectrophotometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 409(1-2),<br />
159-170.<br />
Shah, M., Balaraman, R. (1999). Effect of phenobarbitone, carbamazepine and sodium valproate<br />
on the elimination kinetics of acetaminophen. Ind. J. <strong>Ph</strong>armacol. 31(4), 311-314.<br />
Shaheen, S. O., Newson, R. B., Sherriff, A., Henderson, A. J., Heron, J. E., Burney, P. G. J.,<br />
Golding, J., the Alspac Study, T. (2002). Paracetamol use in pregnancy and wheezing in<br />
early childhood. Thorax 57(11), 958-963.<br />
Shahrokhian, S. Asadian, E. (2010) . Simultaneous voltammetric determination of ascorbic acid,<br />
acetaminophen and isoniazid using thionine immobilized multi-walled carbon nanotube<br />
modified carbon paste electrode. Electrochim. Acta 55, 666–672.<br />
Shen, S. C., Ko, C. H., Hsu, K. C., Chen, Y. C. (2004). 3-OH flavone inhibition of epidermal<br />
growth factor-induced proliferaton through blocking prostaglandin E2 production. Int. J.<br />
Cancer 108(4), 502-510.<br />
Sirajuddin, Khaskheli, A. R., Shah, A., Bhanger, M. I., Niaz, A., Mahesar, S. (2007). Simpler<br />
spectrophotometric assay of paracetamol in tablets and urine samples. Spectrochim. Acta,<br />
Part A. 68(3), 747-751.<br />
Skeika, T., Faria, M. F. D., Nagata, N., Pessoa, C. A. (2008). Simultaneous voltammetric<br />
determination of dypirone and paracetamol with carbon paste electrode and multivariate<br />
calibration methodology. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 19, 762-768.<br />
Sneader, W. (2000). The discovery of aspirin, a reappraisal. Biol. Med. J, 321(7276), 1591-1594.<br />
Snežana, M., Gordana, M., Aleksandra, P., Snežana, T., Emilija, P. (2007). Determination of<br />
diclofenac sodium in commercial pharmaceutical formulations and human control serum<br />
using a kinetic-spectrophotometric method. Chem. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Bull. 55, 1423-1426.<br />
Sochor, J., Klimes, J., Sedlácek, J., Zahradnícek, M. (1995). Determination of ibuprofen in<br />
erythrocytes and plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed.<br />
Anal. 13(7), 899-903.<br />
Sotiropoulus, J. B., Deutsch, T., Plakogiannis, F. M. (1981). Comparative bioavailability of three<br />
commercial acetaminophen tablets. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Sci. 70(4), 422-425.<br />
Souza, D. d., Machado, S. A. S., Avaca, L. A. (2003). Voltametria de onda quadrada. Primeira<br />
parte, aspectos teóricos. QuÃmica Nova, 26, 81-89.<br />
Stolker, A. M., Niesing, W., Fuchs, R., Vreeken, R., Niessen, W. A., Brinkman, U. T. (2004).<br />
Liquid chromatography with triple-quadrupole and quadrupole-time-of-flight mass<br />
spectrometry for the determination of micro-constituents, A comparison. Anal.<br />
Bioanal.Chem. 378(7), 1754-1761.<br />
Stone, E. (1763). An account of the success of the bark of the willow tree in the cure of agues.<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>ilos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 53, 195-200.<br />
128
Su, W.-Y., Cheng, S.-H. (2010). Electrochemical oxidation and sensitive determination of<br />
acetaminophen in pharmaceuticals at poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-modified screenprinted<br />
electrodes. Electroanalysis, 22(6), 707-714.<br />
Sun, S. F., Lui, G. R., Wang, Y. H. (2006). Simultaneous determination of acetaminophen,<br />
caffeine, and chlorphenamine maleate in paracetamol and chlorphenamine maleate<br />
granules. Chromatographia 64(11-12), 719-724.<br />
Sun, Y., Takaba, K., Kido, H., Nakashima, M. N., Nakashima, K. (2003). Simultaneous<br />
determination of arylpropionic acidic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in<br />
pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma by HPLC with UV detection. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm.<br />
Biomed. Anal. 30(5), 1611-1619.<br />
Supalkova, V., Petrek, J., Havel, L., Krizkova, S., Petrlova, J., Adam, V., Potesil, D., Babula, P.,<br />
Beklova, M., Horna, A., Kizek, R. (2006). Electrochemical sensors for detection of<br />
acetylsalicylic acid. Sensors 6(11), 1483-1497.<br />
Suzanne W. S., Wong, H. Y. (1998). Standards of laboratory practice, analgesic drug monitoring.<br />
Clin. Chem. 44(5), 1110–1123.<br />
Tapan, K. G., Dulal, K. T. (2010). <strong>Ph</strong>ysicochemical classification and formulation development<br />
of solid dispersion of poorly water soluble drugs, an updated review. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biol.<br />
Arch. 1(2), 189 – 192.<br />
Tattersall, J., Greenwood, R., Farrington, K. (1992). Membranous nephropathy associated with<br />
diclofenac. Postgrad. Med. J. 68, 392–3.<br />
Thun, M. J., Henley, S. J., Patrono, C. (2002). Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs as<br />
Anticancer Agents, Mechanistic, <strong>Ph</strong>armacologic, and Clinical Issues. J. Natl. Cancer<br />
Inst. 94(4), 252-266.<br />
Torriero, A. A. J., Luco, J. M., Sereno, L., Raba, J. (2004). Voltammetric determination of<br />
salicylic acid in pharmaceuticals formulations of acetylsalicylic acid. Talanta 62(2), 247-<br />
254.<br />
Townshend, A., Alan Wheatley, R. (1998). Oxidative chemiluminescence of some nitrogen<br />
nucleophiles in the presence of formic acid as an ancillary reductant. Analyst, 123(2),<br />
267-272.<br />
Trinder, P. (1954). Rapid determination of salicylate in biological fluids. Biochem. J. 57(2), 301-<br />
300.<br />
Tsikas, D., Tewes, K. S., Gutzki, F.-M., Schwedhelm, E., Greipel, J., Frölich, J. C. (1998). Gas<br />
chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric determination of acetylsalicylic acid in<br />
human plasma after oral administration of low-dose aspirin and guaimesal. J.<br />
Chromatogr. 709(1), 79-88.<br />
Tubino, M., de Souza, R. L. (2006). Determination of diclofenac in pharmaceutical preparations<br />
by diffuse reflectance photometry. Talanta 68(3), 776-780.<br />
129
Utzinger, U., Richards-Kortum, R. R. (2003). Fiber optic probes for biomedical optical<br />
spectroscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 8(1), 121-147.<br />
Valcárcel, M., Gallego, M., Ríos, A. (1998). Coupling continuous flow systems to instruments<br />
based on discrete sample introduction. Fresenius. J. Anal. Chem. 362(1), 58-66.<br />
Valderrama, P., Poppi, R. J. (2010) Second order standard addition method and fluorescence<br />
spectroscopy in the quantification of ibuprofen enantiomers in biological fluids.<br />
Chemometr. Intell. (Available online).<br />
Vane J. R, Flower R. J, Botting R.M. (1990). History of aspirin and its mechanism of action.<br />
Stroke. 21(12 Suppl), 12-23.<br />
Velasco, D., Danoux, C. B., Redondo, J. A., Elvira, C., San Román, J., Wray, P. S., Kazarian, S.<br />
G. (2011). pH-sensitive polymer hydrogels derived from morpholine to prevent the<br />
crystallization of ibuprofen. J. Controlled Release. 149(2), 140-145.<br />
Vidal, A. D. n., Reyes, J. F. G. a., Barrales, P. O., DÃaz, A. M. (2002). Uv Spectrophotometric<br />
flow-through multiparameter sensor for the simultaneous determination of<br />
acetaminophen, acetylsalicylic acid, and caffeine. Anal. Lett. 35(15), 2433 - 2447.<br />
Vila-Jato L.J., J. Blanco, M.J. Alonso, J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. <strong>Ph</strong>armacol. (1986) The effect of the molecular<br />
weight of polyethylene glycol on the bioavailability of paracetamol-polyethylene glycol<br />
solid dispersions. 38, 126-128.<br />
Vilchez, J., Blanc, R., Avidad, R., Navalón, A. (1995). Spectrofluorimetric determination of<br />
paracetamol in pharmaceuticals and biological fluids. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 13(9),<br />
1119-1125.<br />
Vire, J. C., Kauffmann, J. M. (1994). Trends in electrochemistry in drug analysis. Curr. Top.<br />
Electrochem. 3, 493-515.<br />
Walily El, A. F. M., Abdel-Kader G. A., Belal, S. F., Khamis, E. F. (1999). Selective<br />
spectrofluorimetric determination of phenolic [beta]-lactam antibiotics through the<br />
formation of their coumarin derivatives. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 20(4), 643-653.<br />
Wang, B., Liu, G., Dou, Y., Liang, L., Zhang, H., Ren, Y. (2009). Quantitative analysis of<br />
diclofenac sodium powder via near-infrared spectroscopy combined with artificial neural<br />
network. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 50(2), 158-163.<br />
Wang, S. F., Xie, F., Hu, R.-F. (2007). Carbon-coated nickel magnetic nanoparticles modified<br />
electrodes as a sensor for determination of acetaminophen. Sens. Actuators B. 123(1),<br />
495-500.<br />
Wang, W. H., Wong, W. M., Dailidiene, D., Berg, D. E., Gu, Q., Lai, K. C., Lam, S. K., Wong,<br />
B. C. Y. (2003). Aspirin inhibits the growth of helicobacter pylori and enhances its<br />
susceptibility to antimicrobial agents. Gut 52(4), 490-495.<br />
Wangfuengkanagul, N., Chailapakul, O. (2002). Electrochemical analysis of acetaminophen<br />
using a boron-doped diamond thin film electrode applied to flow injection system. J.<br />
<strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 28(5), 841-847.<br />
130
Welch, R. M., Conney, A. H. (1965). A simple method for the quantitative determination of Nacetyl-p-aminophenol<br />
(APAP) in urine. Clin Chem, 11(12), 1064-1067.<br />
Whelton, A., Stout, R. L., Spilman, P. S., Klassen, D. K. (1990). Renal effects of ibuprofen,<br />
piroxicam, and sulindac in patients with asymptomatic renal failure. Ann. Internal Med.<br />
112(8), 568-576.<br />
Whittle, B. J. (2003). Gastrointestinal effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Fundam.<br />
clin. <strong>Ph</strong>armacol. 17(3), 301-313.<br />
Wong T. L, Solomonraj G, Thomas H. B. (1976). High-pressure liquid chromatographic<br />
determination of acetaminophen in biological fluids. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Sci. 65, 1064–1066.<br />
Wong, S., Appleberg, M., Ward, C. M., Lewis, D. R. (2004). Aspirin resistance in cardiovascular<br />
disease, A Review. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Vasc. Surg. 27(5), 456-465.<br />
Wyszecka, K. E., Warowna, G. M., Fijalek, Z. (2003). Determination of 4-aminophenol<br />
impurities in multicomponent analgesic preparations by HPLC with amperometric<br />
detection. J. <strong>Ph</strong>arm. Biomed. Anal. 32(4-5), 1081-1086.<br />
Xianwen, K., Zhirong, G., Yao, Z., Zhilin, W., Jun, J. Z. (2009) Magnetic molecularly imprinted<br />
polymer for aspirin recognition and controlled release. Nanotechnology 20, 1- 7.<br />
Xu, C., Li, B. (2004). Spectrophotometric determination of paracetamol with microwave assisted<br />
alkaline hydrolysis. Spectrochim. Acta Part A. 60(8-9), 1861-1864.<br />
Xu, M., Chen, L., Song, J. (2004). Polarographic behaviors of diclofenac sodium in the presence<br />
of dissolved oxygen and its analytical application. Anal. Biochem. 329(1), 21-27.<br />
Xu, Z., Yue, Q., Zhuang, Z., Xiao, D. (2009). Flow injection amperometric determination of<br />
acetaminophen at a gold nanoparticle modified carbon paste electrode. Microchim. Acta<br />
164(3), 387-393.<br />
Yang, X., Wang, F., Hu, S. (2008). Enhanced oxidation of diclofenac sodium at a nano-structured<br />
electrochemical sensing film constructed by multi-wall carbon nanotubes-surfactant<br />
composite. Mater. Sci. Engineer. C 28(1), 188-194.<br />
Yilmaz, B. (2010) Simultaneous determination of estradiol valerate and medroxyprogesterone<br />
acetate in a tablet formulation by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. Anal. Sci.<br />
26(3), 391-393.<br />
Yinnon, A. M., Moreb, J. S., Slotki, I. N. (1987). Drug points, Nephrotic syndrome associated<br />
with diclofenac sodium. Brit. Med. J. 295(6597), 556.<br />
Yousef, E. M., Heli, H., Bathaie, S. Z., Mousavi, M. F. (2007). Electrocatalytic oxidation of<br />
glucose at a Ni-curcumin modified glassy carbon electrode. J. Solid State Electrochem.<br />
11(2), 273-282.<br />
131
Zen, J. M., Ting, Y. S. (1997). Simultaneous determination of caffeine and acetaminophen in<br />
drug formulations by square-wave voltammetry using a chemically modified electrode.<br />
Anal. Chim. Acta 342(2-3), 175-180.<br />
Zhao, S., Bai, W., Yuan, H., Xiao, D. (2006). Detection of paracetamol by capillary<br />
electrophoresis with chemiluminescence detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 559(2), 195-199.<br />
132
List of Publications<br />
1. Simpler Spectrophotometric Assay of Paracetamol in Tablets and Urine Samples. Sirajuddin,<br />
Abdul Rauf Khaskheli, Afzal Shah, Muhammad Iqbal Bhanger, Abdul Niaz and Sarfaraz<br />
Mahesar; Spectrochimica Acta Part A, 2007, 68, 747-751.<br />
2. Simpler and faster spectrophotometric determination of diclofenac sodium in tablets, serum<br />
and urine samples. Abdul Rauf Khaskheli, Sirajuddin, Kamran Abro, S.T.H Sherazi, H.I<br />
Afridi, S.A. Mahesar, Munawar Saeed; Pakistan Journal of Environmental and Analytical<br />
Chemistry, 2009, 10, 53-58.<br />
3. Highly sensitive spectrometric method for determination of hydroquinone in skin lightening<br />
creams: application in cosmetics. S. Uddin, A. Rauf, T.G. Kazi, H. I. Afridi and G.<br />
Lutfullah; International Journal of Cosmetic Science, 2010, 1- 8.<br />
4. Differntial pulse voltammetric determination of paracetamol in tablet and urine samples at a<br />
carbon film electrode. Abdul Rauf Khaskheli, Jan Fischer, Jiří Barek,Vlastimil Vyskočil,<br />
Sirajuddin and Muhammad Iqbal Bhanger. (Submitted in Electroanalysis).<br />
5. Evaluation of ibuprofen in tablet formulation and urine samples by transmission FTIR<br />
spectroscopy in conjunction with partial least squares (PLS). A. R. Khaskheli, S. T. H.<br />
Sherazi, Sirajuddin, S. A. Mahesar, M. Ali, Nazar Kalwar and Aftab Kandhro. (Submitted in<br />
Talanta).<br />
6. Differntial pulse voltammetric determination of salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid in<br />
tablet and urine samples at carbon film electrode. Abdul Rauf Khaskheli, Jan Fischer, Jiří<br />
Barek,Vlastimil Vyskočil, Sirajuddin, Muhammad Iqbal Bhanger and Munawar Saeed.<br />
(Submitted in Electroanalysis).<br />
Other Publications<br />
1. Ultra-trace level determination of hydroquinone in waste photographic solutions by UV–Vis<br />
spectrophotometry. Sirajuddin , M. Iqbal Bhanger, Abdul Niaz, Afzal Shah and Abdul<br />
Rauf; Talanta, 2007.<br />
2. Abdul Niaz, Sirajuddin, Afzal Shah, S. A. Mahesar, Abdul Rauf. Adsorptive stripping<br />
voltammetric determination of hydroquinone using an electrochemically pretreated glassy<br />
carbon electrode. Pakistan Journal of Environmental and Analytical Chemistry, 2008, 9,<br />
110-117.<br />
3. GC-MS Quantification of Fatty Acid Profile including trans FA in the Locally Manufactured<br />
Margarines of Pakistan. Aftab Kandhro, S. T. H Sherazi, S. A. Mahesar, M. I. Bhanger, M.<br />
Younis Talpur and Abdul Rauf Khaskheli; Food Chemistry, 2008, 109, 1, 207-211.<br />
133
4. Simultaneous assessment of zinc, lead, cadmium and copper in poultry feeds by differential<br />
pulse anodic stripping voltammetry. S. A. Mahesar, S. T. H Sherazi, A. Niaz, M. I. Bhanger,<br />
Sirajuudin and Abdul Rauf Khaskheli; Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2010, 48, 2357-<br />
2360.<br />
5. Fast voltammetric assay of water soluble phthalates in bottled and coolers water. Munawar<br />
Saeed, Sirajuddin, Abdul Niaz, Afzal Shah, H.I Afridi and Abdul Rauf; Analytical<br />
Methods, 2010, 2, 844-850.<br />
6. Assessment of Azithromycin in pharmaceutical formulation by FTIR transmission<br />
spectroscopy. M. Ali, S.T.H Sherazi, S.A. Mahesar and Abdul Rauf. (Submitted in Journal<br />
of Brazillian chemical Society).<br />
7. Appraisal of Erythromycin in pharmaceutical formulation by FTIR transmission<br />
spectroscopy. M. Ali, S.T.H Sherazi, S.A. Mahesar and Abdul Rauf. (Submitted in Pakistan<br />
Journal of <strong>Ph</strong>armaceutical Sciences).<br />
134