02.06.2013 Views

file1

file1

file1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Activity 9.3<br />

The goodness-of-fit test is also known as the:<br />

(a) r ¥ c g 2<br />

(b) One-variable g 2<br />

(c) 2 ¥ 2 g 2<br />

(d) None of the above<br />

CHAPTER 9 Measures of association 271<br />

9.2.3 Comparing observed frequencies with any set of expected<br />

frequencies<br />

Sometimes we want to compare our observed frequencies with a particular set of expected<br />

frequencies. For instance, researchers have found that left-handed people are overrepresented<br />

in people with Infl ammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). That is, the prevalence of left-handers is<br />

higher than would be expected in that sample of people. Let’s assume that we tested 150<br />

people with IBD and found the following:<br />

Right-handed Left-handed<br />

Observed 120 30<br />

Expected under the null hypothesis 75 75<br />

If you simply divided 150 by 2 in order to fi nd the expected frequencies under the null<br />

hypothesis, you would end up with 75. It should be immediately apparent that we do not<br />

expect there to be equal numbers of people who are right- and left-handed in the population,<br />

because we know that there are far fewer left-handed people in the population than righthanders.<br />

The real expected frequencies are the ones that we know from previous research<br />

that exist in the population. There is also a sex difference in handedness – the prevalence of<br />

left-handedness is greater in men than women. This means that men and women cannot be<br />

included together in one group. Approximately 10% of women are left-handed.<br />

We decided to see whether there was a greater prevalence of left-handedness in women<br />

with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) rather than IBD. Three hunded and seventeen women<br />

were given a questionnaire that included questions on handedness; 268 of them were righthanded,<br />

and 49 were left-handed. As we expect 90% of women to be right-handed, then we<br />

would expect 285.3 of our sample to be right-handed (90% of 317 = 285.3). This means that<br />

we would expect 31.7 of them to be left-handed (317 - 285.3 = 31.7).<br />

Right Left<br />

n n<br />

Observed 268 49<br />

Expected 285.3 31.7<br />

We actually found that only 268 were right-handed, representing 84.5% of the total of 317,<br />

and 49 were left-handed, representing 15.5% of the total, rather than the 10% that we would<br />

expect to fi nd.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!