02.06.2013 Views

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

120<br />

ICM-CSIC<br />

LOCEAN/SA/CETP<br />

IFREMER<br />

the sum over the Kirchhoff Integral harmonics to obtain<br />

<br />

( , , , ) =<br />

2m<br />

<br />

ks ko<br />

u10w<br />

<br />

( ks,<br />

ko)<br />

cos2m(<br />

siw),<br />

<br />

<br />

(41)<br />

o<br />

<br />

m=<br />

0<br />

o<br />

<strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong> <strong>L2</strong> <strong>OS</strong><br />

Algorithm Theoretical<br />

Baseline Document<br />

Doc: SO-TN-ARG-GS-0007<br />

Issue: 3 Rev: 9<br />

Date: 25 January 2013<br />

Page: 120<br />

where we have explicitly included the dependence of the final scattering coefficients on the<br />

wind speed u 10 and wind direction w (towards which the wind is blowing), and where<br />

<br />

m 2qsq<br />

2<br />

o<br />

2 ks<br />

k 1 o T s o<br />

m<br />

( , ) =<br />

<br />

o<br />

o(<br />

k , k ) e(<br />

qsqo)<br />

2(0)<br />

IK<br />

qsqo<br />

(42)<br />

Note that the scattering coefficient harmonics are independent of wind direction. Moreover,<br />

these harmonics only depend on the incoming and scattered radiation incidence angles, the<br />

wind speed, and difference between the incoming and scattered radiation azimuth angles.<br />

Thus, switching from vector notation to angles, we can write the scattering coefficients as<br />

o( <br />

10 <br />

o<br />

m=<br />

0<br />

<br />

o,<br />

o,<br />

s,<br />

s,<br />

u10, w)<br />

= 2m(<br />

o,<br />

s<br />

o,<br />

s,<br />

u ) cos2m(<br />

si<br />

w),<br />

4.7.5.3. The Semi-Empirical Geometrical Optics Scattering Model<br />

While the models discussed in the preceding section are attractive because of their<br />

applicability to a large range of scattering geometries and ocean surface roughness<br />

conditions, they are difficult to empirically correct if their predictions are not accurate.<br />

Indeed, we have found that the predictions obtained from both the Kirchhoff and SSA-1<br />

models do not agree well with the scattered celestial sky brightness inferred from the data,<br />

especially near the galactic plane where the sky brightness is strongest and also strongly<br />

varying as a function of position in the celestial sky. In order to improve the predictions we<br />

have adopted a geometrical optics model, which is more amenable to empirical adjustment<br />

than the Kirchhoff and SSA-1 models.<br />

Owing its analytical simplicity and flexibility, scattering models based upon the geometrical<br />

optics approximation became widely used in the 1960s, there is a large body of literature on<br />

the subject (see [26-32,35,36,38] and references therein), with applications ranging from the<br />

interpretation of radar backscatter from the lunar surface to interpretation of microwave<br />

emission and scattering from the rough ocean surface.<br />

Taking the high-frequency limit of the Kirchhoff expression (35) for the scattering cross<br />

sections, as is done in [28], we obtain the general form of the geometrical optics<br />

approximation for the bistatic scattering cross sections,<br />

<br />

<br />

o<br />

2<br />

4<br />

2qsq<br />

<br />

o<br />

( ks , ko<br />

) =<br />

T ( , ) ( / ,<br />

2<br />

ks<br />

ko<br />

P qx<br />

qz<br />

q<br />

( q q ) q q o<br />

s<br />

o<br />

s<br />

o<br />

y<br />

/ q<br />

z<br />

)<br />

(77)<br />

(43)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!