02.06.2013 Views

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

79<br />

ICM-CSIC<br />

LOCEAN/SA/CETP<br />

IFREMER<br />

<strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong> <strong>L2</strong> <strong>OS</strong><br />

Algorithm Theoretical<br />

Baseline Document<br />

Doc: SO-TN-ARG-GS-0007<br />

Issue: 3 Rev: 9<br />

Date: 25 January 2013<br />

Page: 79<br />

Finally, it should be noted, as discussed in the section describing the theoretical model, that<br />

there may be a dependence of the roughness emission on relative angle between emission<br />

direction and wind direction, but we have not been able to see a consistent azimuthal signal in<br />

the <strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong> data as of this writing, and so we current set all azimuthal harmonic coefficients to<br />

zero identically.<br />

4.3.2.2. Quality control and diagnostics<br />

As explained in section 4.3.3 below, the SSA/SPM model is not expected to provide correct<br />

results for wind seas generated by winds less than about 2 m/s and larger than 15 m/s . This<br />

corresponds roughly to wind friction velocity u* less than 0.6 cm/s and larger than 0.5 m/s.<br />

The model can be applied as it is at launch for conditions out of this range however, we<br />

expect that the CAL/VAL activities will provide after commissioning phase a variability<br />

estimate at low winds and a residual foam impact at high winds which will be used to<br />

correctly tune the model.<br />

4.3.2.3. Exception handling<br />

There is no particular exception handling in the mathematical algorithm except if the<br />

following auxiliary data are not provided by the processor or exceed the ranges anticipated:<br />

the neutral equaivalent wind speed [m/s], (which can be estimated fromthe wind<br />

speed magnitude at 10 meter height, the roughness length, and the auxiliary parameter<br />

“Coefficient of drag with waves Cd “defined by : u*= Cd U10<br />

)<br />

the inverse wave age parameter for the wind sea (which can be deduced from<br />

2U<br />

10<br />

estimates of both U 10 and the mean period of wind waves Tp: ),<br />

gT<br />

the incidence angles i at <strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong> pixel,<br />

the sea surface temperature Ts,<br />

the prior sea surface salinity SSS, and,<br />

the azimuth angle at <strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong> pixel relative to wind direction i .<br />

If one of the prior values of the retrieved geophysical parameters is out of the LUT range, or<br />

if any retrieved geophysical parameter goes out of LUT range during the retrieval, different<br />

flags (Fg_OoR_Rough_dim1, Fg_OoR_Rough_dim2, Fg_OoR_Rough_dim3,<br />

Fg_OoR_Rough_dim4, Fg_OoR_Rough_dim5) are raised. No extrapolation is done and the<br />

boundary value is taken.<br />

4.3.3. Assumption and limitations<br />

As discussed above, the empirical model described above is expected to fail in strong storm<br />

and frontal conditions (strong wave-wave, wave-current or wind-wave interaction<br />

conditions). Furthermore, we do not expect the model to perform well in presence of either<br />

strong swells, strong currents, very small and unsteady winds where the link between surface<br />

p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!