02.06.2013 Views

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SMOS L2 OS ATBD - ARGANS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

47<br />

ICM-CSIC<br />

LOCEAN/SA/CETP<br />

IFREMER<br />

<strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong> <strong>L2</strong> <strong>OS</strong><br />

Algorithm Theoretical<br />

Baseline Document<br />

Doc: SO-TN-ARG-GS-0007<br />

Issue: 3 Rev: 9<br />

Date: 25 January 2013<br />

Page: 47<br />

when compared to exact numerical simulation using the Method of Moment with a general<br />

agreement between SSA-1 and MoM within 3dB in VV and within 1.5 dB in HH<br />

polarizations [12]. In average, SSA-1 overestimate HH and underestimates VV so that SSA-1<br />

systematically overestimates the H/V ratio with a mean of order +20%. The errors on the sea<br />

surface roughness statistics are difficult to estimate but will clearly have an important impact<br />

as well.<br />

A complete error budget estimate can not be provided without any estimate of the error on<br />

the auxiliary sun brightness temperature data at 1.4 GHz. If it comes out of L1 processor, we<br />

need an error budget on the estimate of that parameter from L1.<br />

3.6.4. Practical considerations<br />

3.6.4.1. Calibration and validation<br />

Dedicated CAL/VAL activities should be envisaged for the <strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong> sunglint model with two<br />

main components:<br />

-an earth-based campaign aiming at measuring precisely the sunglint scattering at L-band<br />

(e.g., experiment similar to [4]), with high-quality concomitant auxiliary solar fluxes<br />

measurements at 21 cm as well as surface roughness information to calibrate and validate the<br />

bistatic-scattering coefficient models.<br />

-a <strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong>-data based analysis. Re-analysis of all flagged pixels and brightnesses for which<br />

good quality (close in time and space) co-localized auxiliary wind and solar flux data at 21<br />

cm are available shall be performed to assess the efficiency of the model.<br />

3.6.4.2. Quality control and diagnostics<br />

Assuming the major source of error in the model shall be the estimation of the sun brightness<br />

temperature at 1.4 GHz, quality control and diagnostics will strongly depend on the accuracy<br />

for that auxiliary data.<br />

If it comes out of L1 processor (without a priori geophysical input), a complementary quality<br />

check shall be performed for that auxiliary data using earth-based solar flux measurements<br />

available at 1.4 GHz. These are available from sun-tracker radiometers by the US Air Force,<br />

at Sagamore Hill (Massachusetts), since 1966. They can be obtained through the National<br />

Geophysical Data Center at Boulder, Colorado. These data sets also include other solar fluxes<br />

measurements conducted at 1415 MHz since 1988 from radiometers in Palehua (Hawaii), San<br />

Vito (Italy) and Learmonth (Australia), and 1GHz data are also collected daily at Nobeyama<br />

Radio Observatory (Japan). If high temporal resolution solar fluxes can be obtained, the<br />

closest data in time from <strong>SM<strong>OS</strong></strong> acquisitions shall be used to monitor quality controls, as sun<br />

brightness temperature values might evolve very significantly over short time scales. The socalled<br />

R-components of the sun brightness temperature indeed consist of the second and<br />

minute-duration bursts produced by the active sun components: sunspots (manifestations of<br />

magnetically disturbed conditions at the sun's visible surface), flares (huge explosions on the<br />

surface of the sun) and other transient activity. This high-temporal varaibility of the sun<br />

signals might strongly affect the quality of the forward model estimates.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!