03.06.2013 Views

Aerospace Research - ISTC Funded Projects 1994-2009

Aerospace Research - ISTC Funded Projects 1994-2009

Aerospace Research - ISTC Funded Projects 1994-2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

along with a flow rate approaching the<br />

designed value and a full pressure recovery<br />

coefficient being quite high. The porous bleed<br />

permitted the increase of the airflow rate in<br />

the model with sidewalls to be more than<br />

doubled. This flow rate was more than 30%<br />

higher than the airflow rate in the model<br />

without sidewalls. It was also found that the<br />

downstream porous bleed was the most<br />

efficient. The upstream bleed closing exerted<br />

virtually no effect on the airflow rate and did<br />

not entail reduction in the flow rate. The<br />

efficiency of the porous bleed increased with<br />

the flow Mach number. At the same time, it<br />

was found that, after inlet start, porous bleed<br />

closing did not result in the inlet nonstart,<br />

i. e., the inlet remained in the started state.<br />

It was natural that the inlet flow rate increased<br />

when the boundary layer bleed was closed.<br />

Concurrently, the pressure distribution over<br />

the model channel walls and Pitot pressure<br />

fields in the typical channel cross sections<br />

behind the inlet throat, airflow rate and full<br />

pressure recovery coefficient were measured.<br />

Evidently, modification of the geometrical<br />

configuration of the model or shape of<br />

the boundary layer bleed entailed a significant<br />

change in the pressure distribution in<br />

the model channel. The pressure distributions<br />

in the models with and without side<br />

walls, being compared, showed that the<br />

inlet start was accompanied by a decrease<br />

of the static pressure in the channel and<br />

corresponding increase of the airflow rate<br />

owing to the absence of a shock wave at the<br />

inlet entrance and side spreading reduction.<br />

Enhancement of Flight Performance, Economy and Efficiency<br />

Fig. 18: Photo of the model with starting device<br />

It should be noticed that the pressure<br />

distribution differed not only quantitatively<br />

but also qualitatively in the case of inlet<br />

nonstart. Such a difference in the pressure<br />

distributions at the inlet nonstart was typical<br />

at any Mach number studied.<br />

Tests with the inlet were carried out using 0,<br />

2, and 4 degree angles of attack (Figs. 18<br />

and 19). The measurement results have<br />

revealed that at any Mach number the air flow<br />

rates and full pressure recovery coefficients<br />

were smaller for 0 degree angle of attack.<br />

This was caused by the decreasing angle of<br />

compression on the first compression surface<br />

and by corresponding reduction of the<br />

entrapped jet in the undisturbed stream.<br />

The effect of the position of the cowl leading<br />

edge on the varying air was studied (Fig. 20).<br />

The upstream movement of the cowl resulted<br />

in more air captured and more intense inner<br />

compression, i.e., the mass flow rate and total<br />

pressure recovery coefficient increased<br />

(Fig. 21). It is evident that in this case there<br />

was a certain optimum position of the cowl<br />

leading edge, which would provide inlet start<br />

and maximum value of the airflow rate and full<br />

pressure recovery coefficients.<br />

The model tests in hot­shot wind tunnel<br />

IT­302M were conducted at Mach numbers<br />

ranging from 5 to 8 within the range<br />

of Reynolds numbers from 5 · 10 6 to 30 · l0 6 .<br />

The main goal of the investigations of the inlet<br />

model was to check the adequacy of results<br />

of tests in different wind tunnels, to obtain<br />

the experimental data at Mach numbers from<br />

5 to 8, to ascertain the inlet start (nonstart)<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!