03.06.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Calliostoma virginicum (Conrad)<br />

Plate 26, figure 12<br />

1875. Zizyphinus virfJ.inicus Conrad, North Carolina Geol. Survey<br />

Rept., vol. 1, app. A, p. 22, pl. 4, .fig. 4.<br />

Type locality : Suffolk, V a.<br />

'calliostoma virginicum gizehi Gardner, n. subsp.<br />

Plate 26, figures 16, 17<br />

Shell moderately low, pyramidal. Whorls trapezoidal,<br />

regularly increasing in size, 5 to 6 in number.<br />

Protoconch decorticated, minute, probably of not much<br />

more than 1 volution. Initial sculpture of 3 equal and<br />

equidistant spirals, the anterior and posterior of which<br />

gradually become more prominent relatively and absolutely;<br />

intercalaries introduced on early whorls. Sculpture<br />

when fully developed, consisting of a single broad,<br />

simple, moderately elevated cord in front of the posterior<br />

suture, a similarly broad and elevated cord directly<br />

behind the anterior suture and, on the intermediate<br />

area, 4 to 8 fine, sharp lirae tending to alternate<br />

in size when numerous; 2 simple and moderately strong<br />

cords girdling the periphery and a fine, sharp threadlet<br />

intercalated between them. Suture line distinct but inconspicuous,<br />

following the anterior spiral of the double<br />

keel but rarely completely covering it, so that the carina<br />

is partially visible as a fine, sharp thread directly behind<br />

the suture. Base flattened, sculptured with 9 to 11 simple<br />

lirae, those nearer the axis the broader and the more<br />

irregular in size and spacing. Aperture somewhat<br />

broken, rudely rhomboidal; outer margin imperfect but<br />

obviously angulated at the periphery. Inner margili<br />

concave, reflected. Umbilical region slightly excavated<br />

but imperforate.<br />

Dimensions of holotype: Height, 9.2 mm. ; maximum<br />

diameter, 10.5 mm.<br />

Holotype: U.S.N.M. 325467.<br />

Type locality : Yorktown, V a. Yorktown formation,<br />

zone 2.<br />

0 alliostoma virginicum gizehi exhibits a tendency<br />

toward an increase in the number of lirations accompanied<br />

by a corresponding decrease in their prominence.<br />

The subspecies, though distinct from 0. virginicum<br />

in general aspect, is merely the result of a relative and<br />

an absolute increase in the strength of the sculpture<br />

between the anterior and posterior carinae and a relative<br />

and absolute decrease in the strength of. the spirals<br />

delimiting the carinae. In some individuals, indeed, the<br />

spiral outlining the posterior keel is reduced until it is<br />

scarcely more prominent than the lira in front of it.<br />

In 0. labrosum (Conrad) (pl. 26, fig. 10) , a low and<br />

broadly biconic member of the same group, the general<br />

sculpture plan is constant, but the sculpture is greatly<br />

subdued.<br />

Distribution: Yorktown formation, Yorktown, York County,<br />

Va.<br />

PART 2. SCAPHOPOI>A AND GASTROPODA 185<br />

Calliostoma hertfordense Gardner, n. sp.<br />

Plate 26, figures 13, 14<br />

Shell depressed, pyramidal, terminating obtusely.<br />

Volutions 5. Protoconch not well differentiated, very<br />

small, of probably not more than 1 coil, smooth, immersed<br />

in the succeeding turn. Earliest whorls of<br />

conch ornamented with 3 strong spirals. Posterior<br />

spiral increasing in prominence with the establishment<br />

of the later sculpture, becoming wavy and finally<br />

beaded, and outlining the narrow shoulder. Anterior<br />

of the 3 spirals increasing similarly in strength, gradually<br />

assuming a beaded character, and delimiting the<br />

. anterior peripheral keel. Median spiral flattening; 2<br />

low intercalaries introduced on the spire, 3 on the body<br />

whorl. A single, rather prominent, rounded thread<br />

revolving midway between the anterior keel and the<br />

anterior suture line on all but the earliest whorls.<br />

Suture not very distinct, separated from the posterior<br />

carina of the succeeding whorl by a shallow but welldefined<br />

channel. Peripheral keel obtuse, outlined by<br />

a rather strong, simple spiral; a second spiral, similar<br />

in strength and character, placed midway between it<br />

and the anterior beaded spiral. Base flattened, sculp·<br />

tured with about 9 rather feeble and irregular spirals;<br />

the 2 or 3 spirals in the umbilical region the strongest<br />

and separated by the widest interspaces; remaining<br />

lirae tending to fuse near the inner lip but becoming<br />

more distinct toward the labrum. Incrementals well<br />

developed on the body whorl both behind the periphery<br />

and on the base. Aperture subquadrate. Pillar<br />

slightly excavated, heavily calloused. Umbilical pit<br />

small, possibly pathologic.<br />

Dimensions of holotype: Height 7.3 mm., maximum<br />

diameter 8.8 mm.<br />

Holotype: U.S.N.M. 325469. . ·<br />

Type locality: One and one-half miles above Murfreesboro,<br />

Hertford County, N. C. Yorktown formation.<br />

The diagnostic features of the species are the low,<br />

turbinate outline, the sutural channel separating the<br />

whorls, and the characteristic sculpture of 2 not very<br />

prominent, beaded spirals-the one posterior, the other<br />

anterior-and 3 or 4 low, subequal intermediate"lirae.<br />

The early whorls and the general sculpture plan of<br />

the adult are similar in 0. hertfordense and in 0. virginicum<br />

(Conrad). 0 alliostoma virginicwm is the<br />

larger shell and, relatively as well as absolutely, higher;<br />

the channelling between the sutures is deeper than in<br />

0. hertfordense, and all the spirals are simple. The<br />

small umbilical perforation in the North Carolina species<br />

may be the result of the injury recorded by the<br />

scar. 0. virginicum is imperforate. 0. virginicurm<br />

gizehi is more closely comparable, but in the subspecies,<br />

also, the spirals are simple and the apical angle smaller.<br />

The type is unique.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!