03.06.2013 Views

Broadcasting Oct 31 - American Radio History

Broadcasting Oct 31 - American Radio History

Broadcasting Oct 31 - American Radio History

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

O<br />

R A D I O T E L E V I S I O N C A B L E S A T E L L I T E<br />

Vol. 105 No. 18 Eci-@<br />

co<br />

-1 TOP OF THE WEEK 1<br />

CBS in Beirut CNN ir Grera7a<br />

<strong>Broadcasting</strong> scrambles to cover a week of wrath<br />

Network radio and TV departments<br />

find themselves working on<br />

two fronts to keep up with<br />

action in Beirut and Grenada<br />

The resources of major news organizations<br />

everywhere were put to their toughest test of<br />

the year last week with the unfolding of<br />

back -to -back crises in different parts of the<br />

world. Journalists were literally shaken out<br />

of their beds early last Sunday morning in<br />

Beirut when a suicide bomber drove a truck<br />

with about a ton of dynamite into a Marine<br />

compund, killing more U.S. soldiers in a<br />

single day than any time since the Korean<br />

War. Then, on Monday evening, all three<br />

networks began mobilizing forces on the is-<br />

land of Barbados in the Caribbean, as word<br />

spread that a contingent of Marines was pre-<br />

paring to land on Grenada, about 150 miles<br />

away, to evacuate close to 1,000 medical<br />

students said to be in danger there as a result<br />

of a military coup that was executed the<br />

week before. It was not until early Tuesday<br />

morning, however, that the networks report-<br />

ed an invasion by U.S. Marines was actually<br />

taking place.<br />

From a journalistic standpoint, the Gren-<br />

ada invasion proved to be more intriguing<br />

and frustrating to cover, given the U.S. gov-<br />

ernment's decision to ban coverage on the<br />

island. That decision was made by Secretary<br />

of Defense Caspar Weinberger, who ex-<br />

plained at a press conference last Wednesday<br />

(<strong>Oct</strong>. 26) that the ban was imposed because<br />

the safety of journalists could not be guaran-<br />

teed. That explanation proved wholly unsa-<br />

tisfactory to most of the journalists involved.<br />

"It's the first time in our military history,"<br />

said Daniel Schorr, CNN senior correspon-<br />

dent based in Washington, who is also<br />

known among his colleagues as something<br />

of a journalism historian, that the press has<br />

been banned from covering a U.S. wartime<br />

military operation. Schorr likened the situa-<br />

tion to that imposed by Great Britain during<br />

the Falkland Islands crisis last year, but add-<br />

ed that it's "even worse because at least they<br />

brought some reporters aboard ship even<br />

though they were kept under wraps. In this<br />

case, nobody was taken along."<br />

The news blackout brought vehement pro-<br />

tests from the three broadcast networks and<br />

CNN. Both CBS News President Edward<br />

M. Joyce and ABC News President Roone<br />

Arledge wrote letters of protest directly to<br />

Secretary Weinberger on Thesday (<strong>Oct</strong>. 25),<br />

and Ed Godfrey, president of the <strong>Radio</strong> -Tele-<br />

vision News Directors Association, fol-<br />

lowed with a third protest to President Rea-<br />

gan two days later after the two networks<br />

had not received any response from the De-<br />

fense Department.<br />

Joyce's letter to Weinberger said in part: "I<br />

wish to protest in the strongest possible<br />

terms," the policy of restricting reporters<br />

from the island of Grenada. "I would also<br />

like to protest the attitude expressed by your<br />

public affairs department," continued Joyce,<br />

as expressed in a statement to CBS corre-<br />

spondent Bill Lynch, that the department<br />

had "learned a lesson from the British in the<br />

<strong>Broadcasting</strong> <strong>Oct</strong> <strong>31</strong> 1983<br />

27<br />

Falklands. To use the censorship by the Brit-<br />

ish as an example to be followed by the U.S.<br />

in the military operation is baffling to me and<br />

deeply disturbing because it refutes the<br />

principals of the First Amendment..."<br />

Joyce concluded by urging Weinberger to<br />

take "immediate action to rectify the situa-<br />

tion."<br />

ABC's Arledge wrote asking for Wein-<br />

berger's "assistance and approval in allow-<br />

ing ABC News correspondents [and crews]<br />

to cover the military operation" on Grenada.<br />

"The problems we are encountering are<br />

largely logistical," said Arledge, who added<br />

that the network would assume the risks that<br />

its journalists would encounter on the island.<br />

Arledge argued that the practice of covering<br />

wartime action "is as old as our nation and as<br />

old as the U.S. Marines -and that the con-<br />

stitutional framers gave special consider-<br />

ation to the function of the press in a free<br />

society." He concluded with the contention<br />

that the Marines who landed on Grenada<br />

"deserve as much coverage as the debate in<br />

Washington over their presence there."<br />

RTNDA's Godfrey protested "vigorously"<br />

to Reagan on behalf of the 2,000 association<br />

members. He described the administration's<br />

policy toward coverage of the Grenada situa-<br />

tion as one of "secrecy and censorship" and<br />

said that "even if we were to accept the argu-<br />

ments for secrecy before the invasion, I can<br />

find no acceptable reasons for continuing<br />

these policies more than two days after the<br />

event." The safety of journalists, he said, "is<br />

not an acceptable excuse. Reporters have<br />

I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!