State of New York - courses.cit.cornell.edu - Cornell University
State of New York - courses.cit.cornell.edu - Cornell University
State of New York - courses.cit.cornell.edu - Cornell University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
STATE OF NEW YORK<br />
SUPREME COURT: COUNTY OF TOMPKINS<br />
====================================<br />
JASON SEYMOUR, JASON HUNGERFORD,<br />
SUSAN MARTIN, KRISTINE SHAW, MARGOT<br />
CHIUTEN, SHAWNA BLACK, JAMES PELTON,<br />
JASON THORNTON, PATRICIA FLERY,<br />
ELIZABETH COHEN, PATRICIA BUTLER,<br />
MARJORIE PARKER, SANDRA FENTIMAN,<br />
ALICE KENLY, TODD HERON, RONALD<br />
CAMPBELL, LISA BUSHLOW, NINA PANZER,<br />
TERESA NIEDZIALEK, NANCY CHAPMAN,<br />
ANNE BELL, ELISABETH LINDSAY, BRENDA<br />
MARSTON, SARAH SIMPKINS, JOHN HOUSTON,<br />
DAVE HEBRON, DEBORAH VOGEL, SILVIA<br />
GARCIA, CARLA CARICK, LAURIE KOEHLER,<br />
LAWRENCE ROBERTS, OSCAR HAARSTAD,<br />
KIM TRAHAN, CHRISTINA KNICKERBOCKER,<br />
LEE WILLIAMS, BETH DIPASQUA, NANCY<br />
GABRIEL, MARION DAGROSSA, JOSEPH<br />
WHEELER, DAVID BIDDLE, SUZANNE<br />
SCHWARTZ, MARY WHITE, RODNEY<br />
FAIRBANKS, BRENT WANDEL, AMELIA<br />
SAUTER, LEAH HOUGHTALING, MARTHA<br />
HARDESTY, JOANN EDWARDS, SARAH B.<br />
JEFFERIS, and TAMMY J. TRAVIS,<br />
Plaintiffs, COMPLAINT<br />
-against- Index # 2004-<br />
JULIE HOLCOMB as CITY CLERK <strong>of</strong> the<br />
CITY OF ITHACA; CITY OF ITHACA; and<br />
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF<br />
HEALTH,<br />
Defendants.<br />
====================================<br />
Plaintiffs, by and through their attorneys, Bixler and Stumbar, LLP and Mariette Geldenhuys, as<br />
and for their complaint herein, allege as follows:<br />
mg\litigat\SameSex.com<br />
THE PARTIES<br />
1. The twenty-five couples who are plaintiffs in this action represent the same diversity <strong>of</strong> ages, jobs<br />
and <strong>edu</strong>cational background as any twenty-five randomly selected heterosexual couples. They are,<br />
for example, teachers, attorneys, social workers, librarians, nurses, business people, students and<br />
- Page 1 -
stay-at-home moms. The difference is that these couples are being denied basic civil rihts<br />
afforded to married couples in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>.<br />
2. Plaintiffs Jason Seymour and Jason Hungerford are in their twenties and have been together since<br />
1998. Both are employed in the technology field.<br />
3. Plaintiffs Susan Martin and Kristine Shaw are the parents <strong>of</strong> two children, ages 13 and 11. They<br />
have been together for approximately eight years. Susan is a psychologist and Kristine is an<br />
attorney.<br />
4. Plaintiffs Margot Chiuten and Shawna Black are in their twenties and have been together for more<br />
than seven years. They own a home together and plan on having children. Margot is a landscape<br />
architect and Shawna works for Alterra Healthcare.<br />
5. Plaintiffs James Pelton and Jason Thornton have been together for more than six years. James has<br />
degrees in electronics engineering and computer science. Jason is studying graphic design and<br />
computer graphics.<br />
6. Plaintiffs Patricia Flery and Elizabeth Cohen have been together for seven years and have a three-<br />
year-old daughter. Patricia is an <strong>edu</strong>cator and counselor, and Elizabeth works as a school social<br />
worker.<br />
7. Plaintiffs Patricia Butler and Marjorie Parker have been together for seven years. Patricia is a<br />
registered nurse and Marjorie is a medical social worker.<br />
8. Plaintiffs Sandra Fentiman and Alice Kenly each have grown children. They have been together<br />
since 1998.<br />
9. Plaintiffs Todd Heron and Ronald Campbell have been together for 24 years. Todd is employed<br />
by the Ithaca Bakery and Ronald is employed at Alternatives Federal Credit Union.<br />
10. Plaintiffs Lisa Bushlow and Nina Panzer have been together for more than six years and have a<br />
two-year-old son. Lisa is employed at the Hangar Theatre. Nina is a full-time mother and part-<br />
mg\litigat\SameSex.com<br />
- Page 2 -
time college instructor.<br />
11. Plaintiffs Teresa Niedzialek and Nancy Chapman have been together for five years. They are both<br />
employed by Wegmans Food Markets.<br />
12. Plaintiffs Anne Bell and Elisabeth Lindsay have been together since 2001. Anne is the mother <strong>of</strong><br />
two grown children and is a high school librarian. Elisabeth is a registered nurse. They own two<br />
homes together.<br />
13. Plaintiffs Brenda Marston and Sarah Simpkins are the parents <strong>of</strong> a four-year-old son. They have<br />
been together for 13 years and have owned a home together since 1993. Brenda is an archivist and<br />
academic librarian at <strong>Cornell</strong> <strong>University</strong>. Sarah is an assistant dean at <strong>Cornell</strong> <strong>University</strong>.<br />
14. Plaintiffs John Houston and Dave Hebron have been together for six years. Both John and Dave<br />
are employed in the food service industry.<br />
15. Plaintiffs Deborah Vogel and Silvia Garcia are both 50 years old and have been together for 15<br />
years. They describe themselves as an “average American couple.” They pay taxes, volunteer in<br />
their community and are planning for their retirement together.<br />
16. Plaintiffs Carla Carick and Laurie Koehler have been together 10 years and have raised Carla’s<br />
birth son together since he was eleven years old.. He is now twenty-one and a sophomore at the<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Virginia, which is where both <strong>of</strong> his moms went to school. He is totally supportive<br />
<strong>of</strong> his moms’ getting married to each other.<br />
17. Plaintiffs Lawrence Roberts & Oscar Haarstad have been together for over 17 years. This couple<br />
has done much for their community. Oscar (“Ross”) co-founded AIDS Work, a local organization<br />
dealing with AIDS related issues and Larry is the program director for the Finger Lakes<br />
Independence Center and chairs the City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca Disability Advisory Board.<br />
18. Plaintiffs Kim Trahan and Christina Knickerbocker have been together for ten years. One is a<br />
physician’s assistant and the other is employed at Binghamton <strong>University</strong>.<br />
mg\litigat\SameSex.com<br />
- Page 3 -
19. Plaintiffs Lee Williams and Beth DiPasqua are in their twenties and have been together 2 ½ years.<br />
Lee is working towards her bachelor’s degree and Beth works in a pet store.<br />
20. Plaintiffs Nancy Gabriel and Marion DaGrossa are in their sixties and both have retired from<br />
teaching. They are the mothers <strong>of</strong> five children and four grandchildren and have been together<br />
more than eleven years. They are Quakers and long time members <strong>of</strong> the Ithaca Meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Religious Society <strong>of</strong> Friends.<br />
21. Plaintiffs Joseph Wheeler and David Biddle have been together for 2 ½ years. Joseph is an<br />
attorney at a prestigious law firm in Elmira and David is a PhD. candidate in mathematics at<br />
<strong>Cornell</strong> <strong>University</strong>.<br />
22. Plaintiffs Suzanne Schwartz and Mary White have been together for over six years and are<br />
registered as Domestic Partners at <strong>Cornell</strong> <strong>University</strong>.<br />
23. Plaintiffs Rodney Fairbanks and Brent Wandel have been together two years, Brent having moved<br />
from Michigan to be with his partner. Brent is currently a student and Rodney has worked for the<br />
United <strong>State</strong>s Postal Service for over nine years.<br />
24. Plaintiffs Amelia Sauter and Leah Houghtaling have been together for eight years and co-own<br />
their house and their car. Amelia is a social worker and Beth is a business manager.<br />
25. Plaintiffs Martha Hardesty and Joann Edwards have been together for 5 ½ years and co-parent two<br />
<strong>of</strong> Joann’s children. Martha is a teacher and Joann is a nurse.<br />
26. Plaintiffs Sarah B. Jefferis and Tammy J. Travis have been registered as domestic partners in the<br />
City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca since 2000. Sarah is an assistant pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> English and Writing at Ithaca College<br />
and Tammy is the owner and chef <strong>of</strong> a local Patisserie.<br />
27. Defendant City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca (hereafter referred to as “the City”) is a municipal corporation with<br />
<strong>of</strong>fices at City Hall, 108 East Green Street, Ithaca, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> 14850.<br />
28. Defendant Julie Holcomb (hereafter referred to as “the City Clerk”) is the City Clerk <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong><br />
mg\litigat\SameSex.com<br />
- Page 4 -
Ithaca, County <strong>of</strong> Tompkins, <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>. The City Clerk is responsible for receiving and<br />
acting upon marriage license applications on behalf <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca.<br />
29. The City Clerk received applications for marriage licenses from the plaintiffs and refused to issue<br />
such licenses.<br />
30. Defendant <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Health (hereafter “DOH”) is charged with<br />
administering the law governing marriage in the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>. DOH directed <strong>cit</strong>y and town<br />
clerks in <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> not to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples seeking to marry.<br />
mg\litigat\SameSex.com<br />
VENUE AND JURISDICTION<br />
31. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to CPLR §301.<br />
32. Venue is proper in Tompkins County pursuant to CPLR §504 because defendants include the City<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ithaca, which is situated in Tompkins County.<br />
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT<br />
33. This action arises out <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca’s City Clerk’s unconstitutional refusal, under<br />
instructions from the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Health, to issue marriage licenses to the<br />
plaintiffs solely because each plaintiff is gay or lesbian and seeks to marry an individual <strong>of</strong> the<br />
same sex.<br />
34. The Plaintiffs in this action are committed couples who intend to spend their lives together and<br />
who want to assume the responsibilities <strong>of</strong> marriage and to avail themselves <strong>of</strong> the myriad <strong>of</strong><br />
benefits conferred by the marital contract.<br />
35. The right to marry is one <strong>of</strong> the deeply personal privacy interests protected by the due process<br />
clause <strong>of</strong> the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Constitution, Art. I, Section 6. The exclusion <strong>of</strong> Plaintiffs and other<br />
same-sex couples from legal marriage violates this fundamental right.<br />
36. The right to equal protection <strong>of</strong> the laws under the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Constitution, Art. I, Section<br />
11, also prohibits the <strong>State</strong>’s discriminatory marriage scheme, which, by drawing impermissible<br />
- Page 5 -
distinctions based on gender and sexual orientation, leaves all same-sex couples without access to<br />
this extraordinarily significant legal institution.<br />
37. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>’s Domestic Relations Law is unconstitutional ins<strong>of</strong>ar<br />
as it denies the right to marry to same-sex couples and an injunction requiring Defendants to grant<br />
them marriage licenses and access to civil marriage on the same terms and conditions available to<br />
different-sex couples.<br />
38. Except for the fact that they are <strong>of</strong> the same sex, plaintiffs are legally qualified to marry under the<br />
laws <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>.<br />
39. During the winter and spring <strong>of</strong> 2004, each plaintiff couple identified hereinabove appeared in<br />
person and applied for a marriage license by completing an application at the Office <strong>of</strong> the City<br />
Clerk <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca.<br />
40. After completing the marriage application and filing it with the City Clerk <strong>of</strong> the City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca,<br />
each plaintiff couple was notified by the City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca as follows:<br />
“The <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Health has advised that the issuance <strong>of</strong> a marriage<br />
license to same-sex couples violates <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> Law and would subject any municipal<br />
clerk who issues such a license to criminal prosecution and penalties.<br />
Accordingly, I am constrained to reject your recent application for a marriage license.”<br />
41. The aforementioned letter <strong>of</strong> rejection was signed by the defendant Julie Conley Holcomb as the<br />
City Clerk and by Martin A. Luster as the City Attorney for the City <strong>of</strong> Ithaca.<br />
42. The plaintiff couples bringing this action continue in their desire to be married in the <strong>State</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong><br />
<strong>York</strong> to participate fully in an institution that plays a central role in our society.<br />
43. By denying Plaintiffs access to marriage, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> law forbids them from making the legal<br />
commitment to one another that marriage entails and deprives them <strong>of</strong> the comprehensive legal<br />
structure for couples that marriage provides.<br />
44. Plaintiffs are harmed by their exclusion from a broad array <strong>of</strong> statutory protections, benefits, and<br />
mg\litigat\SameSex.com<br />
- Page 6 -
mutual responsibilities afforded by <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong>’s marriage law. In addition, because many private<br />
parties rely on the <strong>State</strong>’s conferral <strong>of</strong> marriage and the definition <strong>of</strong> a “spouse,” plaintiffs suffer<br />
deprivation <strong>of</strong> certain privately conferred benefits and protections, and from lack <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />
recognition and respect for their relationship in their neighborhood, workplace and in other areas<br />
<strong>of</strong> their everyday lives.<br />
mg\litigat\SameSex.com<br />
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION<br />
45. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation contained in the<br />
preceding paragraphs as if set forth fully herein.<br />
46. Article I, section 6 <strong>of</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong>’s Constitution provides that “no person shall be deprived <strong>of</strong><br />
life, liberty, or property without due process <strong>of</strong> law.” Among the personal interests protected by<br />
the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Constitution’s due process clause is the right to privacy, which includes one’s<br />
ability to make intimate choices <strong>of</strong> a deeply personal nature, including whom to marry.<br />
47. The <strong>State</strong>’s statutory framework for marriage precludes two individuals <strong>of</strong> the same sex from<br />
exercising the right to marry each other, interfering with a core personal choice.<br />
48. The <strong>State</strong>’s statutory framework for marriage, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it bars Plaintiffs from marriage because<br />
they wish to marry a partner <strong>of</strong> the same sex, violates the <strong>State</strong> constitutional right <strong>of</strong> due process.<br />
AS AND FOR A SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION<br />
49. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate by reference each and every allegation contained in paragraphs<br />
one through forty-nine as if set forth fully herein.<br />
50. The <strong>State</strong>’s statutory framework for marriage discriminates against individuals in same-sex<br />
relationships because they wish to marry a life partner <strong>of</strong> the same sex, allowing access to<br />
marriage only for different-sex couples.<br />
51. The <strong>State</strong>’s statutory framework for marriage, ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it discriminates against Plaintiffs and the<br />
other same-sex couples by drawing impermissible distinctions based on gender and sexual<br />
- Page 7 -
orientation, violates the equal protection clause <strong>of</strong> the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong> Constitution, Art. 1 section<br />
11.<br />
WHEREFORE, plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant the following relief:<br />
A) Declare, based on the rights to privacy and equal protection under the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />
Constitution, the Plaintiffs’ rights to marry and to equality have been violated, and that they are<br />
constitutionally entitled to treatment by Defendants equal to the treatment <strong>of</strong> different-sex couples<br />
regarding access to marriage and to the rights that flow from marriage.<br />
B) Direct Defendants to grant marriage licenses to Plaintiffs and otherwise to infringe no longer upon<br />
Plaintiffs’ right to marry, and to treat Plaintiffs no differently than different-sex couples regarding<br />
access to marriage.<br />
C) Grant Plaintiffs such further relief as the Court deems just and proper.<br />
Dated: May ______, 2004 ____________________________________<br />
Bixler & Stumbar, LLP<br />
Attorneys for Plaintiffs XYZ<br />
207 East Court Street<br />
Ithaca, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> 14850<br />
Tel. (607) 273-6300<br />
mg\litigat\SameSex.com<br />
_____________________________________<br />
Mariette Geldenhuys, Attorney at Law<br />
Attorney for Plaintiffs ABC<br />
The Gateway Center<br />
401 East <strong>State</strong> Street, Suite 306<br />
Ithaca, <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> 14850<br />
Tel. (607) 273-2272<br />
- Page 8 -