05.06.2013 Views

rural livelihoods in the global south (f8017s) - University of Sussex

rural livelihoods in the global south (f8017s) - University of Sussex

rural livelihoods in the global south (f8017s) - University of Sussex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Jenn<strong>in</strong>gs, M. (2008) Surrogates <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state: NGOs, development, and Ujamaa <strong>in</strong><br />

Tanzania.<br />

Jordan, L. and P. van Tuijl (eds) (2006) NGO Accountability: Politics, Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and<br />

Innovations. London and Sterl<strong>in</strong>g, VA: Earthscan.<br />

Kabeer, N et al (2012) ‘NGOs and <strong>the</strong> political empowerment Bangladesh: Cultivat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

habits <strong>of</strong> democracy?’ World Development 40(10): 2044-2062<br />

Kilby, P. (2006) Accountability for Empowerment: Dilemmas Fac<strong>in</strong>g Non-Governmental<br />

Organizations World Development 34(6): 951-963.<br />

Lev<strong>in</strong>e, (2002) ‘Convergence or Convenience? International Conservation NGOs and<br />

Development Assistance <strong>in</strong> Tanzania’ World Development 30 (6): 1043-55.<br />

Lewis, D. and Sobhan, B. (1999) ‘Routes <strong>of</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g, roots <strong>of</strong> trust? Nor<strong>the</strong>rn NGOs,<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn NGOs and <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> direct fund<strong>in</strong>g’ Development <strong>in</strong> Practice 9: 117-29.<br />

Mercer, C. (2002) ‘NGOs, civil society and democratization: a critical review <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

literature’ Progress <strong>in</strong> development studies, 2 (1): 5-22.<br />

Nelson, P.J. and Dorsey, E. (2003) ‘At <strong>the</strong> Nexus <strong>of</strong> Human Rights and Development: New<br />

Methods and Strategies <strong>of</strong> Global NGOs’ World Development 31(12):2013-26.<br />

Pearce, J. (ed) (2000) Development, NGOs, and civil society: selected essays from<br />

Development <strong>in</strong> Practice, Oxford: Oxfam.<br />

Puplampu, K.P. and Tettey, W.J. (2000) ‘State-NGO Relations <strong>in</strong> an Era <strong>of</strong> Globalisation:<br />

The Implications for Agricultural Development <strong>in</strong> Africa’ Review <strong>of</strong> African Political<br />

Economy 27(84): 251-272.<br />

Riddell, R. (2007). Does Foreign Aid Really Work? Oxford: Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />

Stewart, S. (1997) ‘Happily ever after <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> marketplace: NGOs and Uncivil society’<br />

Review <strong>of</strong> African Political Economy 24(71): 11-34.<br />

Stiles, K. (2002) ‘International support for NGOs <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh: some un<strong>in</strong>tended<br />

consequences’ World Development 30(5): 835-46.<br />

Thomas, A. et al (2000) Environmental Policies and NGO Influence: Land Degradation and<br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>able Resource Management <strong>in</strong> Sub-Saharan Africa, Routledge, London.<br />

Tvedt, T. (1998) Angels <strong>of</strong> mercy or development diplomats? : NGOs and foreign aid<br />

James Currey, Oxford.<br />

Vivian, J. (1994) ‘NGOs and susta<strong>in</strong>able development <strong>in</strong> Zimbabwe: no magic bullets’.<br />

Development and Change 25:167-193.<br />

Wallace, T. (2002) The role <strong>of</strong> non-governmental organisations <strong>in</strong> African development:<br />

critical issues, pp230-247 <strong>in</strong> D. Belshaw and I. Liv<strong>in</strong>gstone (eds) Renew<strong>in</strong>g<br />

development <strong>in</strong> sub-Saharan Africa, Routledge, London.<br />

Week 10: Easter Break<br />

Week 11: Understand<strong>in</strong>g Livelihoods: research methodologies and participation<br />

This week we will exam<strong>in</strong>e some recent approaches and field-based research<br />

methodologies which might help to provide a more accurate picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>rural</strong> <strong>livelihoods</strong>.<br />

We will consider, <strong>in</strong> particular, <strong>the</strong> advantages and problems <strong>of</strong> participatory <strong>rural</strong><br />

appraisal (PRA) methods?<br />

Core read<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

*Beazley and Ennew ‘Participatory methods and approaches’ <strong>in</strong> Desai, V. and R.B. Potter<br />

(2006) Do<strong>in</strong>g development research, London: Sage pp 189-199. [Poor quality<br />

extract on Study Direct – for better quality go to library!]<br />

Rural Livelihoods <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Global South, 2013 - F8017 18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!