05.06.2013 Views

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEBATE OVER THE ORIGIN AND ...

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEBATE OVER THE ORIGIN AND ...

A CONTRIBUTION TO THE DEBATE OVER THE ORIGIN AND ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>CONTRIBUTION</strong> <strong>TO</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>DEBATE</strong> <strong>OVER</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>ORIGIN</strong> <strong>AND</strong> DEVELOPMENT<br />

OF TREPONEMAL DISEASE: A CASE STUDY FROM SOU<strong>THE</strong>RN ILLINOIS<br />

By<br />

Twana Jill Golden<br />

BA, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 2004<br />

A Thesis<br />

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment<br />

Of the Requirements for the<br />

Master of Arts Degree<br />

Department of Anthropology<br />

In the Graduate School<br />

Southern Illinois University<br />

Carbondale<br />

December 2007


UMI Number: 1450022<br />

UMI Microform 1450022<br />

Copyright 2008 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company.<br />

All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against<br />

unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.<br />

ProQuest Information and Learning Company<br />

300 North Zeeb Road<br />

P.O. Box 1346<br />

Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346


<strong>THE</strong>SIS APPROVAL<br />

A <strong>CONTRIBUTION</strong> <strong>TO</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>DEBATE</strong> <strong>OVER</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>ORIGIN</strong> <strong>AND</strong> DEVELOPMENT<br />

OF TREPONEMAL DISEASE: A CASE STUDY FROM SOU<strong>THE</strong>RN ILLINOIS<br />

By<br />

Twana Jill Golden<br />

A Thesis Submitted in Partial<br />

Fulfillment of the Requirements<br />

for the Degree of<br />

Master of Arts<br />

in the field of Anthropology<br />

Approved by:<br />

Susan M. Ford, Chair<br />

Tracy Prowse<br />

Heather Lapham<br />

Graduate School<br />

Southern Illinois University Carbondale<br />

November 2007


AN ABSTRACT OF <strong>THE</strong> <strong>THE</strong>SIS OF<br />

TWANA JILL GOLDEN, for the Master of Arts degree in Anthropology, presented on<br />

May 11, 2007, at Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.<br />

TITLE: A <strong>CONTRIBUTION</strong> <strong>TO</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>DEBATE</strong> <strong>OVER</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>ORIGIN</strong> <strong>AND</strong><br />

DEVELOPMENT OF TREPONEMAL DISEASE: A CASE STUDY FROM<br />

SOU<strong>THE</strong>RN ILLINOIS.<br />

MAJOR PROFESSOR: Dr. Susan M. Ford<br />

There is a long-standing debate over the origin of syphilis, one of the treponemal<br />

diseases. Some researchers believe syphilis originated in the Old World but was<br />

misdiagnosed as such diseases as leprosy or tuberculosis (Baker and Armelagos 1988;<br />

Rothschild & Rothschild 1996). Others believe syphilis originated in the New World and<br />

was brought to the Old World by Columbus’ crew in 1493; still others believe treponemal<br />

disease originated in Africa spreading with humans as they migrated throughout the<br />

world, mutating to form the syndromes: pinta, yaws, bejel and venereal syphilis (Ortner<br />

2003).<br />

This study explores the possible presence of treponemal disease in Pre-Columbian<br />

North America. 54 individuals from the Archaic Period (4000-2900 BC) site of Carrier<br />

Mills in Saline County, Southern Illinois were examined for characteristic signs of<br />

treponemal disease, including 9 infants, 2 adolescents and 43 adults. Analysis suggests<br />

many individuals suffered from some syndrome closely matching the expected effects of<br />

a treponemal disease. Osteitis, periosteal reaction, lesions, joint fusion, and saber shins<br />

i


were among the characteristics found in this population. Therefore, the Black Earth site<br />

of the Carrier Mills Archaeological District in southern Illinois provides strong evidence<br />

of treponemal disease in the New World prior to 1493 AD.<br />

ii


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

First, I would like to express my deepest sincerities to God and to my family, my<br />

mother Helen, my father Larry, my brother Brad, and my grandmother Mary Jane for all<br />

that they have done for me. For helping me make it through many tough times in<br />

graduate school, for their emotional support, words of encouragement, and for helping<br />

me to become the person I am today. I wouldn’t be where I am today without them!<br />

Special thanks are also due to my wonderful committee members: Dr. Susan M.<br />

Ford (chair) for all of her encouragement and confidence in me, Dr. Heather Lapham for<br />

all of her help and allowing me the space at Stotlar to conduct my research, and Dr. Tracy<br />

Prowse, whose enthusiasm with the “skellies” helped me to find a new appreciation for<br />

my research. I would also like to thank Dr. Robert S. Corruccini for all of his advice,<br />

everyone at the Center for Archaeological Investigations and our wonderful anthropology<br />

secretaries, Tedi Thomas and Becki Bondi, for all of their help and support through<br />

graduate school.<br />

I would like to extend a great round of applause to all of my fabulous friends who<br />

took the time to listen and ask me questions to help me figure out what the bones were<br />

telling me. To Jennifer, Jeff, Mags, Kate, Val, Kim, Jess, and Erica for their support<br />

throughout graduate school when times were so tough. And last but not least, to<br />

everyone in my cohort and the Newman Community. I love you all!<br />

Thanks and God Bless you all!<br />

iii


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

Abstract............................................................................................................................. i<br />

Acknowledgements......................................................................................................... iii<br />

Table of Contents............................................................................................................ iv<br />

List of Tables .............................................................................................................. vi<br />

List of Figures ............................................................................................................. vii<br />

Chapter 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................1<br />

Chapter 2 Theories and Etiologies....................................................................................5<br />

2.1 Hypotheses of the Origin of Treponemal Disease .............................................5<br />

2.2 Hypotheses of the Development of Treponemal Disease..................................6<br />

2.3 Syndromes of Treponemal Disease ...................................................................9<br />

2.3.1 Yaws ....................................................................................................10<br />

2.3.2 Endemic Syphilis .................................................................................13<br />

2.3.3 Venereal Syphilis.................................................................................15<br />

2.3.4 Congenital Syphilis..............................................................................17<br />

2.4 Other Studies of Treponematoses ....................................................................19<br />

2.5 Other Similar Diseases.....................................................................................24<br />

2.5.1 Tuberculosis.........................................................................................24<br />

2.5.2 Leprosy ................................................................................................28<br />

2.5.2.1 Lepromatous Leprosy (LL)......................................................29<br />

2.5.2.2 Tuberculoid Leprosy (TT) .......................................................30<br />

2.5.3 Tumors .................................................................................................31<br />

2.5.4 Osteomyelitis .......................................................................................32<br />

2.5.5 Paget’s Disease ....................................................................................34<br />

2.6 Differential Diagnosis......................................................................................35<br />

2.7 Objectives ........................................................................................................38<br />

Chapter 3 Materials and Methods...................................................................................40<br />

3.1 Materials ..........................................................................................................40<br />

3.1.1 The Sample – Carrier Mills Archaeological District ...........................40<br />

3.1.2 Burial Population – Black Earth Site...................................................41<br />

3.2 Methods............................................................................................................44<br />

3.3 Summary..........................................................................................................49<br />

Chapter 4 Results ............................................................................................................55<br />

4.1 Likelihood of Treponemal Disease..................................................................55<br />

4.1.1 Certain..................................................................................................59<br />

iv


4.1.2 Highly Likely.......................................................................................63<br />

4.1.3 Possible ................................................................................................64<br />

4.1.4 None.....................................................................................................66<br />

4.1.5 Differential Diagnosis and Summary...................................................66<br />

4.2 Type of Treponemal Disease ...........................................................................68<br />

4.2.1 Bone Groups ........................................................................................69<br />

4.3 Comparison of Findings...................................................................................71<br />

4.4 Summary..........................................................................................................73<br />

Chapter 5 Discussion and Conclusions.........................................................................109<br />

5.1 Differential Diagnosis of Treponemal Disease..............................................109<br />

5.2 Comparisons to Other Sites ...........................................................................111<br />

5.3 Carrier Mills – Life in the Archaic ................................................................116<br />

5.3.1 General Middle and Late Archaic......................................................117<br />

5.3.2 Inferences of Life at Carrier Mills .....................................................117<br />

5.4 History and Origin of Treponemal Disease ...................................................121<br />

5.5 Conclusions....................................................................................................123<br />

Literature Cited ............................................................................................................125<br />

Appendices....................................................................................................................137<br />

A Differential Diagnosis......................................................................................137<br />

B Summary of Burials .........................................................................................145<br />

Permission Letter to Use Maps............................................................................163<br />

Vita ..............................................................................................................................164<br />

v


LIST OF TABLES<br />

TABLE 3.1 – Total Sample versus sub-sample..............................................................51<br />

TABLE 4.1 – Pathological Markers of Infants...............................................................76<br />

TABLE 4.2 – Pathological Markers of Adolescents ......................................................78<br />

TABLE 4.3 – Pathological Markers of Young Adults ...................................................80<br />

TABLE 4.4 – Pathological Markers of Middle Adults...................................................84<br />

TABLE 4.5 – Pathological Markers of Old Adults ........................................................88<br />

TABLE 4.6 – Summary and Percentages of Possible Treponemal Markers..................90<br />

TABLE 4.7 – Percentages of Possible Treponemal Disease ..........................................94<br />

TABLE 4.8 – Bone Groups of Infants............................................................................95<br />

TABLE 4.9 – Bone Groups of Adolescents....................................................................96<br />

TABLE 4.10 – Bone Groups of Young Adults...............................................................97<br />

TABLE 4.11 – Bone Groups of Middle Adults..............................................................99<br />

TABLE 4.12 – Bone Groups of Old Adults .................................................................101<br />

TABLE 4.13 – Bone Groups of Carrier Mills compared to Confirmed Disease..........102<br />

vi


LIST OF FIGURES<br />

FIGURE 3.1 – Carrier Mills Archaeological District.....................................................52<br />

FIGURE 3.2 – Carrier Mills Archaeological Sites (Areas A, B, C).............................. 53<br />

FIGURE 3.3 – Map of Archaic Period Burials...............................................................54<br />

FIGURE 4.1 – Percentages of Treponemal Markers in Juveniles and Adults..............103<br />

FIGURE 4.2 – Percentages of Treponemal Markers in Males, Females, and<br />

Total Sample .........................................................................................104<br />

FIGURE 4.3 – Likelihood of Treponemal Disease in Individuals at Carrier Mills......105<br />

FIGURE 4.4 – Burial 38 Drawing of skull showing location of lesions ......................106<br />

FIGURE 4.5 – Burial 38 Left 3 rd metacarpal with unifocal bone loss and<br />

woven bone ...........................................................................................107<br />

FIGURE 4.6 – Burial 38 Right tibia posterior midshaft 6 lesions with woven and<br />

sclerotic reaction ...................................................................................107<br />

FIGURE 4.7 – Burial 38 Left fibula lateral close up of cloaca ....................................108<br />

FIGURE 4.8 – Burial 38 Left 1 st metatarsal plantar with woven and sclerotic<br />

reaction..................................................................................................108<br />

vii


CHAPTER 1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

“The ‘Great Pox’ spread rapidly, afflicting victims with suppurating sores that ate<br />

away flesh and bone and was followed by deformity, insanity and death” (Pook 2001:1).<br />

This was believed to be the “Wrath of God,” his punishment for decadence and<br />

immorality (Salt 2002). The “Wrath of God” is better known today as syphilis. Syphilis,<br />

or the “Great Pox,” as it was referred to in Medieval times, was for most people a<br />

terrifying disease with many consequences. The biggest question to revolve around the<br />

disease of syphilis is its place of origin: just where did this foul disease originate?<br />

In anthropology today, there is a long-standing debate concerning the origin of<br />

treponemal disease. This debate began near the end of the 19 th century (Ortner 2003) and<br />

includes two major themes: 1) where did the first treponemal disease originate; and 2) is<br />

treponemal disease one syndrome or several different syndromes, known collectively as<br />

treponematoses? Some researchers argue that syphilis originated in the Old World but<br />

was not diagnosed as syphilis until the fifteenth century, due to its similarities to other<br />

diseases such as leprosy and tuberculosis (Holcomb 1934; Crosby 1969; Rothschild and<br />

Rothschild 1996; Bogdan and Weaver 1992). Other scholars argue that syphilis<br />

originated in the New World and was brought to the Old World by Christopher Columbus<br />

and his crew in 1493 AD, following their return from the New World (Baker and<br />

1


Armelagos 1988; Cockburn 1963). Still other theories suggest that syphilis originated in<br />

Africa, spreading as humans migrated throughout the world and becoming the syndromes<br />

of treponemal disease we know today (Hudson 1965; Ortner 2003; Bogdan & Weaver<br />

1992).<br />

In order to study disease in ancient populations, we must turn to the discipline of<br />

paleopathology. Paleopathology is the “study of disease, both human and nonhuman, in<br />

antiquity using a variety of different sources including human mummified and skeletal<br />

remains, ancient documents, illustrations from early books, painting and sculpture from<br />

the past, and analysis of coprolites” (Ortner 2003:8). In studying ancient human remains<br />

we can gain a glimpse of what ancient peoples’ lives might have been like.<br />

Paleopathology is particularly important in the study of archaeological human<br />

remains. In these ancient contexts, written records of health and medical practices are<br />

often missing (Lovell 2000). Paleopathology aims to rebuild the life of diseases<br />

historically and geographically, to shed light on cultural processes and their interaction<br />

with disease, to trace the evolution of diseases through time, and to gain a better<br />

understanding of disease processes and how they affect the growth and development of<br />

bone through the study of human archaeological remains (Ibid.).<br />

The most important step in paleopathological investigation is a clear description<br />

of the changes observed on the bones and the documentation of these changes (Lovell<br />

2000). Part of documenting the changes involves recording any patterns of lesions found<br />

on the bone and also within the individual. If lesions are found on the bones, it is<br />

important to identify the specific bone, the section of bone involved, the aspect of the<br />

bone, and the distribution of the lesions on the bone (Ibid.).<br />

2


When pathological lesions are found on the bones of an individual, we must ask<br />

ourselves 1) if the lesions occur on one side of the body or if they are bilateral when<br />

paired bones are present, 2) if there are similar lesions elsewhere on the skeleton of the<br />

individual, and 3) if there are different types of lesions on the skeleton (Lovell 2000).<br />

These types of questions are crucial in the differential diagnosis of skeletal lesions (Ibid.).<br />

Treponemal disease is but one of many different diseases that affect the human<br />

skeleton. Treponematosis, along with tuberculosis, leprosy, tumors, osteomyelitis, and<br />

Paget’s disease leave destructive lesions on the skeleton. The lesions of these diseases<br />

are so similar that differential diagnosis becomes difficult. Hence, the distribution of<br />

lesions within the skeleton of an individual and within the sample become very important<br />

factors.<br />

The purpose of this research is to contribute to the debate on the origin and<br />

development of treponemal disease. Was treponemal infection present in the New World<br />

prior to 1493 AD? Powell and Cook (2005:4) state that treponemal disease has been<br />

present in North America “at least fifteen centuries before the first voyage of Columbus.”<br />

According to Rothschild (2003; 2005), the oldest known skeletal population in North<br />

America to exhibit treponemal infection inhabited the Windover site in Florida, which<br />

dates to approximately 7900 B.P. Other sites where treponematoses have possibly been<br />

detected in North America include: Carrier Mills in Illinois (ca. 6300 B.P.); the Ward site<br />

in Kentucky (ca. 4300 B.P.); the Lu-25 site in Alabama (ca. 4300 B.P.); the Oconto<br />

County site in Wisconsin (ca. 3250 B.P.); Frontenac Island in New York (ca. 2000 B.P.),<br />

Libben in Ohio (1200-850 B.P.) and Amaknak in Alaska (Rothschild 2003; 2005). Was<br />

treponemal infection found in Illinois prior to 1493 AD and, if so, during what time<br />

3


period did it originate? According to Baker and Armelagos (1988), treponemal disease<br />

has existed in Illinois for the past 3,000 years. Most of the sites discussed are from the<br />

Middle to Late Woodland (1000 BC – AD 1000) and Mississippian (AD 1000 – 1400)<br />

periods; two sites mentioned date to the Late Archaic (3000 – 1000 BC) period, the<br />

Klunk site (920 BC) (Powell et al. 2005) and the Morse site (1500 – 1000 BC) (Baker<br />

and Armelagos 1988). Is there more evidence supporting the presence of a treponemal<br />

infection from the Archaic period in Illinois? This research provides strong evidence<br />

that a treponemal disease did exist within the Archaic period sample of the Carrier Mills<br />

Archaeological District. Further analysis provides confirmation that a non-venereal form<br />

of treponemal disease, similar to yaws, was present in Illinois prior to 1493 AD.<br />

The importance of this research is to help elucidate the place of origin of<br />

treponemal disease so that the disease itself may be better understood. This study is just<br />

one component of this ongoing debate. The many components together will tell us where<br />

treponemal disease originated, so that we can learn how it spread and whether or not it is<br />

one or several different syndromes. Studies of disease in ancient populations provide<br />

insight into the geographical and chronological distribution of disease, responses to<br />

stress, the conditions of a society and its growth and how the society functioned as a<br />

whole (Armelagos 1969). Cultural differences, life patterns and life-span may also be<br />

inferred from the skeletons through examination of burial practices, burial goods, the<br />

determination of age and sex, and overall health of the individuals in the sample. This<br />

research and analysis will use a narrow focus on the paleopathological evidence found in<br />

the Carrier Mills Archaeological District to determine the presence or absence of<br />

treponemal disease and to also attempt to address some of these larger issues.<br />

4


CHAPTER 2<br />

<strong>THE</strong>ORIES <strong>AND</strong> ETIOLOGIES OF DISEASES<br />

2.1 Hypotheses of the Origin of Treponemal Disease<br />

There are two major hypotheses concerning the geographic origin of syphilis.<br />

The first one is the Columbian Hypothesis, based on statements from Columbus’<br />

contemporaries Ulrich von Hutten and Ruy Diaz de Isla that Christopher Columbus and<br />

his crew brought syphilis back to Europe upon their return in 1493 from the New World,<br />

where syphilis supposedly originated (Crosby, Jr 1972; see also: Baker and Armelagos<br />

1988; Bogdan and Weaver 1992; Cook 1993; Rodríguez-Martín 2000). This theory<br />

gained its’ popularity in the sixteenth century and is still used today. Crosby (1969)<br />

states that the “pox” was brought back from the New World to the Old World by<br />

Columbus and his crew in the 1490’s. The evidence he gives is the historical accounts of<br />

the physicians and the historians at the time of the epidemic. The reports that exist were<br />

written after the epidemics, but Crosby (1969) suggests that the reason for this is that the<br />

more prominent people of the times wanted to suppress any and all negative reports about<br />

the New World. Therefore, with the absence of written reports, perhaps lost or buried in<br />

archives until after the epidemics, and with the agreement of the disease being new to<br />

Europe, treponemal disease must have originated in the Americas.<br />

5


The second hypothesis is the Pre-Columbian Hypothesis, which suggests that<br />

syphilis existed in the Old World long before Christopher Columbus’ historic journey to<br />

the New World. Since leprosy already existed in the Old World, researchers from the<br />

1400’s and 1500’s (Francisco Villalobos, John Maynard, Petrus Andraes Matthiolous,<br />

Ruiz Diaz de Isla) believed that syphilis may have been misdiagnosed as leprosy<br />

(Holcomb 1934). In other words, doctors in Medieval times thought the two diseases<br />

were one based upon their similar symptoms and did not realize that a separate disease<br />

even existed other than leprosy (Baker and Armelagos 1988; Bogdan and Weaver 1992;<br />

Rodríguez-Martín 2000). Cockburn (1963:154) states that the original peoples of the<br />

“New World were already infected when they first crossed the Bering land bridge tens of<br />

thousands of years ago.” Humans carried many different parasites with them when they<br />

began migrating to other lands, including some form of treponeme. This means that<br />

treponemal disease was everywhere that humans inhabited before the time of ocean travel<br />

(Cockburn 1963), hence before Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue.<br />

2.2 Hypotheses on the Development of Treponemal Disease<br />

In addition to the two major hypotheses regarding the geographic origin of<br />

syphilis, there are three major hypotheses involving the development of the syndromes.<br />

These hypotheses are referred to as the Unitarian Hypothesis, the Non-Unitarian<br />

Hypothesis, and Livingston’s Alternative Hypothesis. The Unitarian Hypothesis suggests<br />

only a single treponematosis was present in both the Old and New Worlds before<br />

Columbus’ journey. This theory, proposed by Hudson (1965), suggests that since there<br />

6


were no specific differences between the bacteria of the four syndromes, the syndromes<br />

should all be classified as strains of one disease known as treponematosis. This<br />

treponemal disease is extremely flexible and evolved with various human populations,<br />

forming the different syndromes that are known today. Hudson (1965) also proposes that<br />

yaws was the first treponematosis and that it probably originated in sub-Saharan Africa,<br />

accompanying humans as they extended their range through migrations to other lands. As<br />

humans migrated, the climate changed, causing yaws to evolve into endemic<br />

treponematosis (Ibid.). Humans became more sedentary and villages emerged. Endemic<br />

treponematosis flourished through children because the barriers of clothing and personal<br />

hygiene had not come into effect yet (Ibid.). Other changes occurred as urban life<br />

emerged, discouraging the spread of endemic treponematosis and encouraging venereal<br />

treponematosis. The sexually transmitted bacteria became more successful within<br />

sedentary villages due to natural selection. The mode of transmission remained the same,<br />

direct contact of an open sore but because humans changed their behaviors, the bacteria<br />

found new ways to invade the host. Treponemal disease then would be a biological<br />

gradient based on each person’s physical and cultural states, presenting itself as different<br />

clinical patterns according to climate and human behaviors such as better hygiene,<br />

wearing more clothing and improved living conditions (Ibid.).<br />

The Non-Unitarian Hypothesis suggests that there are four treponematoses; pinta,<br />

yaws, endemic syphilis, and venereal syphilis, resulting from the mutations of the first<br />

treponemal bacteria (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Rodríguez-Martín 2000).<br />

Hackett (1967) proposes that before 20,000 B.C., the first treponemal disease would have<br />

been pinta, which arose from an animal infection. A genetic mutation, which took place<br />

7


about 10,000 B.C., resulted in yaws, a much more invasive disease with tissue<br />

destruction. The next mutation occurred about 7,000 B.C., also the time when a climatic<br />

change occurred in Africa, Asia and Australia, which resulted in endemic syphilis, in<br />

these dry, warmer regions of the world. A third mutation occurred around 3,000 B.C.,<br />

that resulted in a mild form of venereal syphilis. The last mutation occurred in late<br />

fifteenth century in Europe, with a much more serious form of venereal syphilis occurring<br />

as the result (Ibid.). As humans began to cluster in villages and wear more clothing, the<br />

treponemal bacterium had to adapt to its human host in order to survive. The changing<br />

environmental conditions along with the mutations in the bacteria meant that bacteria that<br />

were transmitted through sexual contact were the favored bacteria. The bacteria that<br />

were transmitted through skin-to-skin contact were the bacteria that died out.<br />

The last hypothesis is Livingston’s Alternative Hypothesis. Livingstone (1991)<br />

believes that there is not enough evidence to assume that the treponemal diseases have<br />

adapted in humans throughout human evolution because it is a newer disease, which has<br />

mutated into several different syndromes of treponemal infection, but was introduced to<br />

the New World at the time of Columbus (Ibid.). He suggests that the increase in rates of<br />

the treponemal disease in cases in the Americas is due to an introduction of an extremely<br />

toxic form of treponemal infection from the Old World as a result of increased contact<br />

with Africa (Livingstone 1991; Rodríguez-Martín 2000). This would have been a new<br />

strain of treponemal infection to the Europeans, which would have resulted in a low<br />

immunity to the disease, causing it to spread rapidly through the sexual practices in<br />

Europe at this time, thus increasing the virulence or infectiousness of the disease<br />

(Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Rodríguez-Martín 2000).<br />

8


Of these hypotheses of origin and development, it is likely that the disease<br />

developed due to a variety of factors. Treponemal disease likely originated with humans,<br />

spreading as humans migrated to new lands. Therefore, treponemal disease would have<br />

existed in both the Old and New Worlds before Columbus’ journey. It is likely that the<br />

syndromes of treponematoses are all different syndromes that have existed independently<br />

in different parts of the world at different times and, in other times coexisting in the same<br />

parts of the world. Now that we have some idea of the hypotheses concerning the origin<br />

and development of treponemal disease, the four syndromes of treponemal disease are<br />

described in detail in the following section.<br />

2.3 Syndromes of Treponemal Disease<br />

They were byles, sharpe, and standynge out, hauynge the<br />

simylitude and quantite of acornes, from which came so foule humours,<br />

and so great stinche, that who so ever ones smelled it, thoughte hym selfe<br />

to be enfecte. The colour of these pusshes [pustules] was derke grene, and<br />

the syghte therof was more grevouse unto the patiente than the peyne it<br />

selfe: and yet their peynes were as thoughe they had lyen in the fyre<br />

(Ulrich von Hutten 1540:2).<br />

This was the first recorded description of syphilis from the 1500’s. Today’s<br />

description is much more scientific, but not significantly different in detail. The first<br />

symptom of syphilis is a painless ulcer or chancre (Lukens 2005). After the chancre<br />

9


develops, various skin eruptions follow which contain mucous patches that ooze<br />

yellowish-greenish pus.<br />

Treponemal disease is a chronic infectious disease caused by the bacterium<br />

Treponema pallidum. These bacteria are known as spirochetes. The disease caused by<br />

Treponema pallidum can be broken down into four different syndromes, with a fifth<br />

syndrome being transmitted congenitally. The syndromes are: Pinta, Yaws, Endemic<br />

Syphilis, Venereal Syphilis and Congenital Syphilis. The differences among the<br />

syndromes mostly depend upon the geographic region in which the infected individual<br />

lives (Larsen 1997; Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Ortner 2003). Listed<br />

below are the syndromes of syphilis with a brief description of each one, except for Pinta<br />

(Treponema pallidum careteum) which affects only the skin and will not be discussed<br />

here because it cannot be found in the archaeological record. Appendix A is a key of<br />

differential diagnosis between yaws, endemic syphilis, venereal syphilis, congenital<br />

syphilis, tuberculosis, leprosy, tumors, osteomyelitis and Paget’s disease.<br />

2.3.1 Yaws<br />

Yaws (Treponema pallidum pertenue) is a chronic, recurrent, infectious, non-<br />

venereal form of the treponematoses that is usually acquired in childhood through direct<br />

contact of an open sore or indirect contact by flies or other insects. Therefore, yaws is<br />

most often seen in children and adolescents (Ortner 2003; Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998). Transmission may also occur congenitally (Ortner 2003). Congenital<br />

yaws results when a woman acquires yaws later in life, transmitting the bacteria to the<br />

fetus via the bloodstream. This does not mean that a young pregnant woman acquiring<br />

10


yaws cannot pass the pathogen to the fetus, but that if an older pregnant woman acquires<br />

yaws, she is more likely to pass the pathogen to her fetus, since yaws is typically acquired<br />

in childhood. Only the skin and bones are affected by this treponemal disease. Yaws can<br />

occur in three different stages. The first stage is characterized by the “mother yaw,” or<br />

the first lesion. This mother yaw appears at the initial site of infection, usually the legs,<br />

between five to eight weeks after the initial exposure (Powell and Cook 2005). The<br />

mother yaw will become larger or thicker, circular, and begin to itch resulting in a tumor<br />

that will eventually form a lesion. This stage can last for six months and it ends with the<br />

mother yaw healing spontaneously (Powell and Cook 2005; Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998).<br />

After a period of latency, the second stage begins with similar lesions to the<br />

mother yaw. The lesions from this second stage form a general pattern all over the body<br />

(Powell and Cook 2005). These lesions are small and either de-pigmented or hyper-<br />

pigmented. If this stage is not treated, it can last up to five years, alternating between<br />

remissions and relapses (Ibid.). Bone lesions may occur at this stage in the shafts of long<br />

bones, the paranasal maxillae, or the hand phalanges. Plantar lesions may also develop in<br />

the feet causing severe debilitation and resulting in individuals walking on the edges of<br />

their feet (Ibid.).<br />

The final or tertiary stage is the most destructive stage of yaws, occurring after a<br />

period of latency that can last for several years. This is the stage that has the most<br />

extensive skeletal lesions. Although very destructive to skin, mucous tissues and bone,<br />

the central nervous system, cardiovascular system and internal organs are not affected,<br />

which is seen in venereal syphilis (Powell and Cook 2005). The most common bone<br />

11


affected is the tibia, followed by the fibula, clavicle, femur, ulna, radius and bones of the<br />

hands and feet (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). The most typical or<br />

characteristic feature of this stage is the saber shin, also known as “boomerang leg”<br />

(Roberts and Manchester 1995; Ortner 2003). Saber shin is a remodeling of the anterior<br />

crest of the tibia, followed by bone deposition. Rarely the posterior aspect of the tibia’s<br />

shaft is changed. This remodeling of bone results in a curved appearance similar to that<br />

of a cavalry saber blade, hence the name saber shin (Powell and Cook 2005).<br />

Another feature that characterizes yaws is dactylitis (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998; Douglas et al.1997). Dactylitis is a bone change occurring in the hands that<br />

leads to enlargement of the phalanges. These bony changes in the hands are more<br />

common in young individuals and are uncommon in venereal syphilis (Aufderheide and<br />

Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Skull lesions are uncommon in yaws, but when they do occur,<br />

they are less severe than cases with venereal syphilis. The frontal or parietals may have<br />

shallow, pitted cortical lesions but the most destructive lesions are more likely to occur in<br />

the nasal-pharyngeal region of the cranium (Powell and Cook 2005). Seven to 8% of<br />

cases with skeletal involvement have extensive destruction of the nasal area and of the<br />

maxilla (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). This results in the condition known<br />

as gangosa (Roberts and Manchester 1995). Gangosa is the destructive ulceration of the<br />

nasal-palatal region of the face. In 5% of cases with gangosa, perforation of the hard<br />

palate occurs, and it is more severe than in cases found with venereal syphilis<br />

(Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Nasal-palatal destruction and tibial<br />

involvement are frequently found in yaws.<br />

12


Differential diagnosis between yaws and venereal syphilis can be very<br />

complicated. For this reason, geographic factors play an important role in the diagnosis<br />

of yaws (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Yaws is generally found in rural<br />

areas of western and equatorial Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean Islands, Southeast<br />

Asia, North Australia, New Guinea, and the islands of the Southern Pacific Ocean<br />

(Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Roberts and Manchester 1995). Rothschild<br />

(2003) speculates that yaws may be the treponemal infection that was present in North<br />

America before Columbus’ journey.<br />

2.3.2 Endemic syphilis<br />

Endemic syphilis (Treponema pallidum endemicum) is an acute, infectious<br />

disease that occurs primarily in children between the ages of two and ten years within<br />

rural areas. Transmission of endemic syphilis occurs directly and indirectly through<br />

contact of the infectious lesions of the skin and mucous membranes or through<br />

contaminated linens. The infection may be spread by the shared use of eating and<br />

drinking implements, such as pipes, toothpicks, or cigarettes (Aufderheide and<br />

Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Powell and Cook 2005). The initial lesion is small, painless, and<br />

often unobserved resulting in a cutaneous and mucosal rash with inflammatory<br />

destructive lesions on the skin, bones and the naso-pharyngeal region (Powell and Cook<br />

2005; Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). A latent period can occur for months or<br />

even years, followed by infectious lesions that have a hard irregular center consisting of<br />

dead cells and pus. These lesions affect the skin, nasopharynx and bones (Powell and<br />

13


Cook 2005). Spontaneous healing of the lesions may occur, but the damage they cause<br />

can be debilitating.<br />

The skeletal lesions that occur in endemic syphilis are almost identical to those<br />

occurring in yaws (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). These skeletal lesions are<br />

also morphologically indistinguishable from the skeletal lesions of venereal syphilis<br />

(description provided below). The differences between yaws and endemic syphilis can<br />

be seen when looking at the population as a whole. In an epidemiological approach,<br />

Rothschild et al. (2000) describe endemic syphilis as having a high population frequency,<br />

occurring in both subadults and adults, affecting few bone groups and very little if any<br />

involvement of the hands and feet, unlike yaws. With endemic syphilis, as with the other<br />

treponematoses, the tibia is the most frequently affected bone, with the typical features<br />

being the deformity of the saber shin (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Roberts<br />

and Manchester 1995). Some of the other more commonly involved bones include the<br />

fibula, ulna, radius, clavicle, phalanges and calcaneus (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998). Nasal-palatal destruction and tibial involvement are frequently found in<br />

this syndrome. Transmission does not occur congenitally, thus endemic syphilis does not<br />

leave any traces on the teeth such as the commonly found Hutchinson’s incisors or<br />

mulberry molars that are found in congenital syphilis, which are discussed below (Ibid.).<br />

Endemic syphilis has a low mortality rate and acts as an endemic disease, limited<br />

to regions of low socioeconomic levels and bad hygiene (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998). This syndrome is often found in arid and warm climates of the eastern<br />

Mediterranean Sea, southwestern Asia, and sub-Saharan Africa (Ibid.). Rothschild<br />

14


(2003) speculates that not only yaws but also endemic syphilis was present in North<br />

America before Columbus’ journey.<br />

2.3.3 Venereal Syphilis<br />

Venereal syphilis (Treponema pallidum pallidum) is an acute, sub-acute, or<br />

chronic infectious disease that has three different phases and is the most dangerous of the<br />

syndromes (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Powell and Cook 2005).<br />

Transmission occurs directly through sexual contact. Indirect transmission can occur<br />

through infected objects such as needles or nonsexual contact of an open sore<br />

(Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998).<br />

Venereal syphilis is characterized in its primary stage by a lesion or chancre at the<br />

point of entry (Ortner 2003). A period of incubation occurs for approximately three<br />

weeks. After this period a small, painless chancre appears on the genitals (Powell and<br />

Cook 2005). If the chancre is not treated, the bacteria will rapidly multiply, spreading<br />

throughout the body via the bloodstream (Ortner 2003). This leads to the secondary stage<br />

which includes a variety of lesions appearing on the skin and genitals (Powell and Cook<br />

2005).<br />

In the secondary stage a rash develops, which affects the skin and mucous<br />

membranes (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). The lesions in this stage are<br />

highly infectious. The bones of the distal limbs are often involved, resulting in periostitis<br />

and osteitis. The various lesions in this phase usually occur in the first year, but they can<br />

last up to four years (Powell and Cook 2005).<br />

15


After a period of latency, the tertiary stage develops. In this third stage the<br />

lesions that occur affect the skin, skeletal, cardiovascular, and central nervous systems in<br />

20 - 50% of cases, if left untreated (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). This is<br />

why venereal syphilis is the most dangerous syndrome. Seventy percent of all the<br />

skeletal lesions occur on the tibia, cranial vault, and bones of the nasal cavity (Ortner<br />

2003). This syndrome has been nicknamed the “Great Imitator” because the symptoms<br />

of this disease are so variable and many resemble those of other diseases, such as leprosy,<br />

tuberculosis, tumors, osteomyelitis, and Paget’s disease (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998).<br />

Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín (1998) state the most characteristic skeletal<br />

lesions of venereal syphilis are those of the skull, specifically the parietal and the frontal<br />

bones. This characteristic is known as Caries sicca and is manifested as sunken,<br />

destructive areas of bone loss and bone growth forming an irregular surface on the cranial<br />

vault. In other words, the cranial vault contains a series of hills and valleys instead of<br />

being smooth. Other commonly affected bones include the tibia, nasal-palatal region,<br />

sternum, clavicle, vertebrae, femur, fibula, humerus, ulna and radius (Ibid.). Of the<br />

previous bones named, the tibia exhibits syphilitic lesions ten times more often than the<br />

others (Bogdan and Weaver 1992). Ortner (2003) states the spine is rarely involved, but<br />

when it is involved, the cervical vertebrae are most often affected. Nasal-palatal<br />

destruction can be found in a less severe form than seen in yaws, and the most commonly<br />

affected joint is the knee (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Roberts and<br />

Manchester 1995).<br />

16


2.3.4 Congenital Syphilis<br />

Venereal syphilis can also be transmitted from the mother to the fetus, which<br />

results in congenital syphilis. This may occur in two ways. First, congenital syphilis<br />

may be transmitted from a mother with venereal syphilis, through the placenta to the<br />

fetus, infecting the fetus with spirochetes (bacteria). The infected fetus will either be<br />

aborted or die soon after birth (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). The<br />

spirochetes cause a degeneration of the cells that develop into bone. This results in a 50<br />

% fatality rate of affected fetuses, but in the case of a mild infection, infants may live for<br />

many years with a dormant phase of congenital syphilis (Ibid.). The second way that<br />

transmission may occur is during birth as the infant passes through the birth canal of an<br />

infected mother (Powell and Cook 2005).<br />

Congenital syphilis can be divided into two different phases, an early phase and a<br />

late phase. The early phase occurs in infants from birth to four years (Powell and Cook<br />

2005). The most characteristic symptom in newborns is rhinitis, which is an<br />

inflammation of the mucous membranes in the nose (Lukens 2005). This inflammation<br />

causes the formation of the permanent central incisors and first molars to be disrupted,<br />

resulting in the dental stigmata of congenital syphilis described below. A rash develops<br />

on the surfaces of the hands, feet, anus and mouth (Powell and Cook 2005). The skeletal<br />

system becomes involved, leading to osteochondritis (i.e. inflammation of the bone and<br />

cartilage), perichondritis (i.e., an inflammation of the connective tissue membrane that<br />

surrounds the cartilage) and periostitis (i.e., an inflammation of the membrane of<br />

connective tissue that covers all bones). The shafts of the tibiae are the most commonly<br />

involved long bones, but any bone can be involved. Infants who survive this stage will<br />

17


have lesions that heal spontaneously, so much so that there are no traces of the lesions<br />

later in life (Ibid.).<br />

According to Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín (1998), osteochondritis of the<br />

metaphysis is found in the majority of the archaeological specimens. Periostitis of the<br />

tibia and the femur can also be found (Ortner 2003). The most frequently involved bones<br />

are the tibia, radius, ulna and the cranium (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998).<br />

The late phase of congenital syphilis occurs in children and adolescents from five<br />

to fifteen years of age (Powell and Cook 2005). This is the phase where disfiguration of<br />

the cranium occurs. Saddle nose may occur which results in the bridge of the nose<br />

collapsing. Other alterations of the skull include Parrot’s sign (prominent frontal bosses),<br />

a high palatal arch, and a disproportionate size of the maxillae and mandible (Ibid.).<br />

Postcranial alterations of the skeleton include flaring scapulae, thickening of the sternum<br />

and clavicles, swelling of the knees, and saber shins. The alterations to the skeleton<br />

discussed here remain with the individual throughout life (Ibid.).<br />

According to Cook (1993) and Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín (1998),<br />

characteristics to look for in the teeth of an individual with congenital syphilis are<br />

Hutchinson’s incisors, mulberry molars and Moon’s molars, which may also be<br />

associated with saddle nose. Hutchinson’s incisors are permanent central incisors that<br />

are smaller than normal and exhibit a shallow notch in the middle of the incisal edge, a<br />

screwdriver shape, the presence of a diastema between the incisors, a dirty grey surface,<br />

with the crown surfaces tapering mesially and distally (Shafer et al. 1974; Hillson 1996;<br />

Pindborg 1970; Hillson et al. 1998). Moon’s molars or bud molars are permanent first<br />

molars exhibiting a clinched appearance of the crown, a narrow occlusal area giving the<br />

18


tooth a domed or bud-like appearance, and bulbous crown formation (Colby et al.1971;<br />

Hillson 1996; Hillson et al.1998). Fournier’s or mulberry molars are permanent first<br />

molars with the occlusal surface altered so that it looks like a mulberry and the tooth is<br />

also smaller than the normal first and second molars (Hillson 1996; Pindborg 1970). The<br />

permanent canines, both upper and lower, may also be affected, but these changes are not<br />

as noticeable as with the permanent incisors and molars. A hypoplastic defect occurs on<br />

the canines in the form of a circular groove around the tip of the tooth (Hillson et al.<br />

1998; Jacobi et al. 1992). This circular groove may become a shallow notch due to<br />

attrition. The canine may also be yellowish in color and may have a puckered appearance<br />

(Jacobi et al. 1992).<br />

2.4 Other Studies of Treponematoses<br />

Brothwell (1970) suggested an evolutionary tree for the treponemes which<br />

included extinct forms of the disease. The evolutionary tree began at the base with a non-<br />

human treponeme branching into two forms, one branch for extinct forms and one branch<br />

for pinta. The tree trunk then continues branching to form yaws, then possibly another<br />

branch for more extinct forms, with the trunk continuing until it branches off with<br />

endemic syphilis and then finally branching into venereal syphilis. This tree would<br />

represent various forms of the treponemes advancing to more complicated forms which<br />

would not be ancestral to the varieties of treponemes that occur today (Brothwell 1970).<br />

My point here is that another form of treponematosis could have been present in North<br />

America besides the syndromes of yaws, endemic syphilis, and venereal syphilis we<br />

19


know today. This other form could have existed for thousands of years and then due to<br />

forces of natural selection, it could have become selected against and died, thus becoming<br />

extinct.<br />

In 1995 Rothschild, Hershkovitz, and Rothschild proclaimed the earliest evidence<br />

of treponemal disease came from Homo erectus. They reanalyzed periosteal reaction<br />

patterns of several H. erectus skeletal remains housed at the National Museum of Kenya<br />

in Nairobi. They found involvement of the long bones and upper and lower extremities.<br />

The periosteal reaction distribution pattern most closely resembled that of yaws. Their<br />

study would confirm an African origin for treponemal disease dating to the Middle<br />

Pleistocene (Rothschild et al. 1995).<br />

Another study conducted by Rothschild and Rothschild (1996) resulted in<br />

conclusions about the effects of venereal syphilis, yaws and endemic syphilis on<br />

populations. Venereal syphilis had a low population frequency (5-14%), a median<br />

number of bone groups were affected (2), and saber shins occurred without remodeling,<br />

or no periosteal reaction was evident on the surface of bones. Bone involvement in<br />

children was also rare (Ibid.). For cases with yaws, there was a high population<br />

frequency (21-33%), a median number of bone groups were affected (4), the hands and<br />

feet were affected, bone lesions occurred in subadults, and saber shins exhibited<br />

periosteal reaction (Ibid.). Endemic syphilis occurred with a high population frequency<br />

(25-40%), a median number of bone groups were affected (2), saber shins showed<br />

evidence of periosteal reaction, and the hands and feet were rarely affected (Ibid.).<br />

Rothschild et al. (2000) state that tibial changes are found in 99% of individuals<br />

with treponemal disease and therefore the tibia is critical to diagnosis of treponemal<br />

20


infection. Treponemal disease can be recognized on the basis of periosteal reaction along<br />

with osteitis (Ibid.). Other diagnostic criteria include saber shin, the frequency of hand<br />

and foot involvement, and the number of bone groups affected (Ibid.). “Bone group” is<br />

an artificial construct used by Rothschild et al. (2000):<br />

“to quantitate the extent of skeletal involvement. Involvement of a skeletal<br />

component is treated as 1 bone group, whether that involvement is unilateral or<br />

bilateral. Carpal, tarsal, metacarpal, metatarsal, and phalangeal involvement are<br />

each considered single bone groups, whether ≥ 1 are affected.” (pg. 937).<br />

For example, the tibiae would be considered a bone group, as would the radii. Each<br />

group of bones in the hands and feet are considered a bone group. If one distal phalanx<br />

on the right hand is affected, then the hand phalanges are considered to be affected, no<br />

matter if it is the right or left side.<br />

In the study conducted by Rothschild et al. (2000), venereal syphilis was<br />

identified as affecting few bone groups (1.9), having a low population frequency (14% or<br />

less), unilateral tibial involvement and saber shin associated with periosteal remodeling.<br />

Yaws affected a median number of bone groups (4), had a high population frequency<br />

(more than 20%), affected the hands and feet frequently and produced bone lesions in<br />

subadults. Endemic syphilis affected few bone groups (2), exhibited a high population<br />

frequency (more than 20%), and occurred in subadults as well as adults (Ibid.).<br />

Rothschild et al. (2000) also found that in cases of yaws and endemic syphilis (bejel),<br />

21


subadults and adults were affected at the same frequencies, while in populations with<br />

syphilis, subadults were affected with a 5% or less frequency.<br />

The study conducted by Rothschild et al (2004) found some of the same results as<br />

the study by Rothschild (2005). Both studies found that bone involvement occurred in 2–<br />

13% of individuals with venereal syphilis, while individuals with yaws or endemic<br />

syphilis had bone involvement of 20–40%. Rothschild (2005) states the most critical<br />

skeletal criterion in diagnosing a treponemal disease is the pattern of periosteal reaction,<br />

tibial remodeling and bone destruction. This study also found that in cases of syphilis<br />

less than 5% of children have skeletal involvement. Children with yaws or endemic<br />

syphilis exhibited a rate of 10–20% skeletal involvement (Ibid.). Venereal syphilis rarely<br />

affected the hands and feet and the incisors and first molars were only affected in cases<br />

with venereal syphilis. Finally, the saber shin remodeling that occurs in venereal<br />

syphilis hinders the signs of periosteal reaction, making it difficult to see the actual<br />

reaction (Ibid.).<br />

In a study by Hutchinson and Richman (2006), skeletal samples were examined<br />

from the prehistoric southeastern United States to try to aid in the debate on the origin<br />

and geographic distribution of syphilis. The skeletal samples encompass a broad<br />

geographic and topographic range, including such time periods as the Archaic (8000 –<br />

1000 BC) through the protohistoric (AD 1500 – 1600) periods. Their study assesses the<br />

presence of treponemal disease, venereal and nonvenereal, in an evolutionary context<br />

according to geographic, physiographic, and temporal patterns of treponemal disease.<br />

Hutchinson and Richman (2006) suggest that increases in the frequency of positive cases<br />

are due to an increase in population density and changing human behaviors. In other<br />

22


words, the evolution of treponemal disease was caused by the changing environment and<br />

living conditions of the human host, instead of changes occurring within the pathogen<br />

itself. The bacteria, therefore did not change; genetically treponemal disease is one<br />

species that has adapted to the changing environment of the human host.<br />

Smith (2006) conducted a study on skeletal remains in the Western Tennessee<br />

River Valley consisting of eight sites spanning the Middle (6000-3000 BCE) to Late<br />

(2500-ca. 1000 to 500 BCE) Archaic and Early Woodland (500 BCE-0 CE) periods. Her<br />

study focused on sedentism and the advent of pottery, which she predicts can be<br />

correlated to the appearance of diseases like treponemal disease (Ibid.). The evidence of<br />

pottery at a site means that the community was using the site for long periods of time.<br />

This would mean that villages were beginning to emerge. The emergence of villages and<br />

a larger group of people living closer together would allow the spread of such diseases as<br />

the treponematoses.<br />

Smith (2006) found that out of 581 individuals, 13 (9 adults and 4 sub-adults)<br />

exhibited “periostitis pathognomonic or indicative of treponemal disease” (Smith<br />

2006:207). The syndrome believed to have affected these samples is of a non-venereal<br />

form. This evidence is pre-Columbian with an increase in frequency occurring after 1000<br />

CE. The increase in frequency was attributed to the advent of sedentism and agriculture<br />

(Ibid.).<br />

Levréro et al. (2007) conducted a recent study on a population of gorillas from the<br />

Republic of Congo who exhibited skin lesions indicative of yaws. In this study 17% of<br />

the 377 gorillas exhibited some type of lesion (Ibid.). The locations of the lesions were<br />

mainly on the faces of the gorillas. They found that in some instances the lesions were so<br />

23


deep that they produced debilitating handicaps (Ibid.). It is interesting that yaws affects<br />

gorillas in some of the same ways as it affects humans. Levréro et al. (2007) found that<br />

yaws affected young gorillas, males were affected more than females, unmated adult<br />

males suffered more with lesions, and in non-breeding groups the immature gorillas<br />

suffered more from yaws. With the presence of yaws among non-human primates, this<br />

study and others like it can help us to determine what life might have been like for our<br />

hominid ancestors who suffered from nonvenereal treponemal disease.<br />

2.5 Other Similar Diseases<br />

Treponemal disease produces effects on the bones of an individual that are very<br />

similar to other diseases. In the past others believed that perhaps syphilis was not<br />

recognized as a disease because it was so similar to tuberculosis or leprosy. Hackett<br />

(1967) states that leprosy was used as a blanket term to refer to several different diseases<br />

present in Europe in Medieval times. The Bible and medieval documents are used to<br />

demonstrate the confusion between syphilis and leprosy (Baker and Armelagos 1988).<br />

Here, I will describe the diseases of tuberculosis and leprosy, in order to aid in the<br />

process of differential diagnosis between treponematoses, tuberculosis, and leprosy.<br />

Other diseases that affect the skeleton in similar ways to treponemal disease include<br />

tumors, osteomyelitis and Paget’s disease. These other diseases will also be discussed in<br />

the section below.<br />

2.5.1 Tuberculosis<br />

24


Tuberculosis is an acute and chronic infectious disease caused by the bacterium<br />

Mycobacterium tuberculosis or M. bovis. M. tuberculosis is the most common bacterium<br />

that affects humans. M. bovis can also affect humans, but it is most commonly found in<br />

cattle (Ortner 2003). M. tuberculosis is transmitted from human to human through the air<br />

by inhaling bacteria within moisture droplets that have been spread into the air from the<br />

cough of an infected person (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). The disease<br />

usually begins in the lungs as a respiratory infection. The bacteria then multiply in the<br />

lungs, spreading to surrounding tissues (Ibid.). The tissues may die, resulting in an area<br />

of scar tissue that may contain live M. tuberculosis bacteria that can remain dormant for<br />

some time. These dormant bacteria can reactivate the disease if other stressors affect the<br />

lung, such as invasion of the lung by cancer or from the person contracting HIV/AIDS<br />

(Powell 1992; Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). This process is known as the<br />

primary infection (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). The primary infection can<br />

lead to a secondary infection by the dissemination of the bacteria via the blood stream to<br />

any or all of the organs in the body. Thus, the infection reaches the skeletal system via<br />

the bloodstream (Ortner 2003). The most important factor to remember in the destruction<br />

of the skeletal tissue is the “pattern of resorptive lesions with little evidence of<br />

proliferative, reactive changes” (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998:134). In other<br />

words, tuberculosis causes a resorption of bone with very little bone growth or evidence<br />

of a reaction occurring.<br />

Skeletal tuberculosis is most often found in areas of trabecular bone (Aufderheide<br />

and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). For this reason, the spine is involved in more than 40% of<br />

the skeletal lesions. The most common area of involvement in the vertebrae is the<br />

25


anterior surface of the thoracic or lumbar vertebral body, which occurs in approximately<br />

80% of cases (Ibid.). Erosion occurs producing an abscess that extends into the<br />

intervertebral space. Herniation of the intervertebral disk occurs, causing the spread of<br />

the abscess through the cartilaginous defect and into the vertebral body. This produces a<br />

“narrowing of the affected intervertebral disk space” (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín<br />

1998:122). The abscess then progresses in a vertical fashion to an adjacent vertebral<br />

body, where the process occurs again. Posterior involvement of the vertebral body only<br />

occurs in approximately 20% of the cases of skeletal tuberculosis, with the same type of<br />

process occurring as in anterior vertebral body involvement. Occasionally the vertebral<br />

neural arch, processes or articular elements are directly involved (Ibid.). A progressive<br />

destruction of the vertebral body often leads to the collapse of the vertebral body. This<br />

collapse causes shortening of the trunk of the individual and anterior bending of the spine<br />

above the collapsed area, which is known as kyphosis. In kyphosis, usually two or three<br />

thoracic vertebrae are involved, but it may involve as many as six or more vertebrae<br />

(Ibid.). Only 10% of cases result in paraplegia, due to the compression of the spinal cord<br />

and nerves (Ibid.).<br />

Other sites of tuberculosis in the skeletal system involve the joints. Bacilli are<br />

disseminated to the trabecular bone of long bones, which resides in the metaphysis. Most<br />

often the hip and knee are involved (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998).<br />

Involvement of the hip occurs in 20% of cases, this being the second most frequent site of<br />

skeletal lesions (Ibid.). It is most common in children between the ages of three and ten<br />

(Ibid.). Most frequently bone destruction occurs in the acetabulum, but the femoral head,<br />

neck and trochanter may be affected. Dislocation of the hip may occur if there is<br />

26


extensive destruction of the area through exposure of the bone by ulceration of the<br />

cartilage (Ibid.). Exposure of the bone will result in bone-on-bone contact causing<br />

eburnation. Eburnation may cause the femur neck to crumble, thus dislocating the hip<br />

(Ibid.). Only 16% of cases of skeletal tuberculosis involve the knee, resulting in<br />

deforming lesions on the surface of the knee, and upper extremity joints are involved<br />

much less frequently (Ibid.).<br />

The ribs, flat pelvic bones, sternum, and sometimes the cranium in adults are<br />

involved (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Rib lesions occur in 9% of<br />

individuals with pulmonary tuberculosis (Ibid.). The internal surfaces of the ribs are<br />

affected by a mild to moderate periostitis. This usually involves several adjacent ribs<br />

with ribs four to eight being the most common ones involved. Sometimes the central<br />

portion of the rib body is involved, but rarely are the costal head and neck affected. Rib<br />

lesions are more common on the left side of the thorax (Ibid.). The cranium is rarely<br />

involved in tuberculosis, but when it does occur, it affects young adults almost<br />

exclusively. The most common area of involvement is the cranial vault. Here,<br />

tuberculosis appears as “small numerous areas of destruction, less than 2 cm in diameter,<br />

with poorly defined margins and some surrounding reactive sclerosis” (Aufderheide and<br />

Rodríguez-Martín 1998:140). The lesions often cross the sutures of the cranium, and the<br />

destruction starts on the outside and moves to the inside of the skull. The facial bones,<br />

mandible and cranial base may be involved, but it is rare (Ibid.).<br />

Since tubercular skeletal lesions that occur in areas other than spine are almost<br />

indistinguishable from other diseases, it is important to study the lesions and their<br />

distribution not only within the skeleton, but also within the population being examined.<br />

27


Only about 1% of all patients with tuberculosis have exhibited skeletal lesions<br />

(Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). The main difference between tuberculosis<br />

and treponemal disease is that tuberculosis destroys already existing bone tissue, while in<br />

treponemal disease there is a proliferation of new bone (Powell 1992). Tuberculosis does<br />

not produce new bone, it only destroys bone.<br />

2.5.2 Leprosy<br />

True leprosy was not known until after 300 BC (Baker and Armelagos 1988). In<br />

Medieval times leprosy was the term used for disfiguring, depigmenting diseases often<br />

spread by sexual contact, heredity, and breastfeeding. The transmission of leprosy in<br />

Medieval times was thought to be from sexual intercourse (Ibid.). Since leprosy is not<br />

transmitted sexually, nor is it hereditary, this gives reason to believe that venereal<br />

syphilis was confused as leprosy (Ibid.). On the other hand, Crane-Kramer (2002)<br />

disagrees that there was any confusion between leprosy and syphilis and provides an<br />

analysis of skeletal material (600 individuals) that suggests a diagnostic confusion<br />

between leprosy and syphilis did not exist in Medieval times.<br />

Leprosy, or Hansen’s disease, as it is sometimes referred to, is a chronic<br />

infectious disease caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium leprae. In humans it affects<br />

the skin, nasal tissues, peripheral nerves, and the skeleton (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998). Leprosy has a worldwide distribution, but it is more commonly found in<br />

tropical and subtropical areas of Asia, Africa, and the Americas (Ortner 2003). This<br />

disease is found more commonly in rural areas as opposed to urban ones (Aufderheide<br />

and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Transmission occurs by the inhalation of the M. leprae<br />

28


acteria through moisture droplets in the air. Direct skin-to-skin contact may also<br />

transmit the bacterium from person-to-person through an ulcerated, infected lesion<br />

(Ibid.). The ratio of infected males to females is 2:1 (Ortner 2003). Bones are only<br />

directly involved in approximately 5% of all patients with leprosy (Ibid.). In leprosy,<br />

more commonly there is a resorption of bone, whereas bone lesions are less frequent.<br />

This resorption occurs in the nasal spine (Buckley and Tayles 2003). Leprosy has two<br />

main clinical forms: lepromatous leprosy (LL) and tuberculoid leprosy (TT) (Aufderheide<br />

and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Both of these forms of leprosy are discussed below.<br />

2.5.2.1 Lepromatous Leprosy (LL). This form of leprosy creates alterations to the<br />

anterior face (Steyn and Henneberg 1995). It begins as a chronic “inflammation of the<br />

nasal mucous membrane” (Lukens 2005:1278), known as rhinitis. The nasal membrane<br />

forms lesions, becomes encrusted, and may bleed, which produces a perforation of the<br />

inner wall of the nose (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). This infection may<br />

spread to the superior surface of the hard palate, to the nasal bone, nasal spine and the<br />

central maxilla. Erosion of these areas can lead to collapse of the bridge of the nose,<br />

resulting in the feature known as saddle nose, which is unique to lepromatous leprosy<br />

(Ibid.).<br />

If the lepromatous rhinitis spreads to the maxilla, it will erode the maxillary bone<br />

beginning in the midline and extending to the palate (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín<br />

1998). This results in the loss of the upper central incisors and may even extend to the<br />

canines. The mandible is not affected. All of the facial changes discussed above are<br />

together known as facies leprosa, which can be seen in archaeological specimens (Ibid.).<br />

29


Postcranially the long bones of the extremities are sometimes affected, beginning<br />

with the metaphysis and possibly spreading to the epiphysis or medullary canal<br />

(Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Involvement occurs more commonly in the<br />

hands and feet. In the hands, the most common area of involvement is the phalanges.<br />

Complete destruction of the distal phalanges may occur, which results in shortening of<br />

the fingers (Ibid.). In the feet, the metatarsals are the most commonly affected bones, as<br />

well as the talus and the calcaneus. This may result in club-shaped stumps for the feet<br />

(Ibid.). The bones of the hands and feet are very badly disfigured through the destruction<br />

that occurs from leprosy (Manchester and Roberts 1989).<br />

2.5.2.2 Tuberculoid Leprosy (TT). In tuberculoid leprosy the number of bacteria in the<br />

skin lesions are greatly reduced, which means that this form of leprosy is much less<br />

infectious (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). The characteristic changes of<br />

facies leprosa present in lepromatous leprosy are absent in tuberculoid leprosy (Ibid.).<br />

Skin lesions are fewer in number, usually a single lesion occurs, but the lesions that do<br />

occur extend to much deeper levels. Similar effects on the bones are seen in lepromatous<br />

leprosy and tuberculoid leprosy, but the effects of tuberculoid leprosy on bones occur<br />

much earlier and more intensively than does lepromatous leprosy (Ibid.).<br />

Leprosy has been found to affect the tibia and fibula (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998). Here it produces pitting and longitudinally striated subperiosteal bone<br />

deposits. The lateral surface of the tibia also exhibits vascular grooves. The fibula is not<br />

as affected as the tibia. These changes often occur bilaterally and symmetrically in the<br />

tibia and fibula and are more prominent in the distal third portion of the bones (Ibid.).<br />

30


2.5.3 Tumors<br />

Treponemal disease can be very similar to many types of tumors also seen within<br />

the bones of an individual. The different tumors discussed here are osteosarcoma,<br />

meningioma, metastatic carcinoma, and multiple myeloma. Osteosarcoma is a malignant<br />

tumor that develops from the connective tissue of bone. In ancient remains they are most<br />

commonly found in individuals under the age of 30 and males are affected more often<br />

than females (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Ortner 2003). This tumor is<br />

found in long bones, most commonly the proximal femur and the head of the humerus.<br />

Osteosarcoma may also affect individuals over the age of 30. In this group, the tumor<br />

affects the flat bones and the skull, with the mandible frequently affected (Aufderheide<br />

and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). New bone formation may occur sometimes resulting in the<br />

appearance of an “onion skin.” Bone spicules that lie perpendicular to the affected bone<br />

surface may also occur. This characteristic is known as a ‘sunburst effect’ (Ibid.).<br />

Meningioma is a soft tissue tumor that affects the membranes of the brain and<br />

spinal cord. The skeletal evidence for these tumors can be found in the spine, but most<br />

are found inside the cranium. This tumor more commonly affects older individuals with<br />

the average age being 45 years (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Most of these<br />

lesions are found on the interior of the skull vault with hyperostosis occurring on the<br />

exterior above the lesion. The hyperostosis may be so pronounced that it causes a<br />

thickening of the skull. A spiculated appearance may result from these changes (Ibid.).<br />

Metastatic carcinoma is a malignant tumor occurring most commonly in<br />

individuals over the age of 40. The vertebrae, pelvis, ribs, major long bones, sternum and<br />

31


skull are the most commonly affected bones found in individuals suffering from this type<br />

of tumor (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Characteristics to look for in the<br />

archaeological record are pathologic fractures and vertebral collapse with multiple bone<br />

lesions (Ibid.).<br />

Multiple myeloma is a malignant tumor usually occurring in individuals over the<br />

age of 40 and more often in males than females (Ortner 2003). The lesions of this tumor<br />

are strictly lytic, restricted to a particular area, small and round, resorbing bone instead of<br />

producing new bone and having a scalloped edge (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín<br />

1998; Ortner 2003). Most often the lesions are seen in the flat bones, particularly the<br />

skull. In the skull, the lesions can occur internally, externally or both. Eventually the<br />

inner and outer table of the skull is penetrated, resulting in a punched-out appearance. In<br />

the later stages of the disease, the lesions may affect the long bone metaphyses, especially<br />

in the femur and humerus, and collapse of the vertebral body may occur (Aufderheide<br />

and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Ortner 2003). The most commonly affected bones are the<br />

vertebrae, ribs, skull, pelvis, femur, clavicle, and scapula (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-<br />

Martín 1998).<br />

2.5.4 Osteomyelitis<br />

Osteomyelitis is an infection within bone and bone marrow caused by bacteria<br />

that commonly produce pus (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). It is<br />

distinguished from periostitis by the involvement of the marrow cavity. The most<br />

commonly affected areas are those of the knee, distal tibia, proximal femur, and<br />

sometimes the humerus is affected (Ibid.). All age groups and any part of the skeleton<br />

32


can suffer from osteomyelitis (Ortner 2003). In children, usually the proximal and distal<br />

ends of the bone are affected, the areas where growth occurs. In adults the ends of the<br />

bones as well as the shafts are affected (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998).<br />

Osteomyelitis usually only affects one bone, although multiple bones can be involved.<br />

The bones become enlarged and deformed through the processes of destruction of the<br />

bone and bone formation. Osteomyelitis is characterized by an area of dead bone that is<br />

surrounded by new bone and has a cloaca (hole) that allows pus to drain from the infected<br />

area. The dead bone is known as a sequestrum, while the new bone is an involucrum.<br />

Healing may occur, but some pitting and cavities will remain in the affected bone (Ibid.).<br />

Osteomyelitis is not commonly found in the bones of the hands and feet. If it<br />

does occur, an expanded involucrum will result which resembles changes found in<br />

congenital syphilis and tuberculosis found in children. In adults the foot phalanges are<br />

more apt to be involved (Ortner 2003). Osteomyelitis is not commonly found in the<br />

vertebrae. If it does occur, adults are affected more often than children, and usually only<br />

one vertebra is involved. The cervical vertebrae are most commonly involved with the<br />

sites of infection in the neural arch and spinous processes (Ibid.). It is also rare to find<br />

osteomyelitis in the skull. When it does occur, the most common area is that of the<br />

frontal bone. The infection will cross sutures, spreading throughout the cranial vault and<br />

into the parietals, but the occipital is rarely involved. The outer table is usually affected<br />

more than the inner table (Ibid.). Middle ear infections can result in osteomyelitis<br />

affecting the mastoid, temporal, and petrous bone, and the mandible and maxilla can also<br />

be affected (Ibid.). No matter what bone is affected, osteomyelitis is characterized by the<br />

presence of a sequestrum and an involucrum.<br />

33


2.5.5 Paget’s Disease<br />

The cause of this disease is unknown. Paget’s disease is characterized by both<br />

bone resorption and new bone formation that occurs simultaneously. The most common<br />

age group affected is those individuals over the age of 60, and males are more commonly<br />

affected than females (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Ortner 2003). Bones<br />

that are affected most commonly are the pelvis, femur, skull, tibia, vertebral column,<br />

clavicles and ribs. The fibula and the bones of the hands and feet are usually not<br />

involved (Ortner 2003). In the skull, both the inner and outer tables are thinned. In later<br />

stages of progression, new bone is produced on the inner and outer tables and also within<br />

the diploë. This phase may last for many years, producing a thickening of the cranium 2-<br />

3 cm in depth (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). The infection usually crosses<br />

over the suture lines (Ortner 2003). The facial bones generally are not affected, but when<br />

they are, severe deformity is the result (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998; Ortner<br />

2003).<br />

Paget’s disease affects all areas of the vertebrae, mostly the lumbar, but the most<br />

noticeable changes occur on the vertebral body (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín<br />

1998). The center of the vertebral body may become depressed, fusion of adjacent<br />

vertebral bodies may occur, and the outer edges may also become widened and dense<br />

(Ibid.).<br />

The long bones may also be affected by Paget’s disease. A thickening of the<br />

cortex occurs, but the medullary cavity is left intact, although it may become narrowed<br />

(Ortner 2003). Bowing occurs from the deposition of new bone on the femur<br />

34


anterolaterally and on the tibia laterally. Fractures can also be seen with the most<br />

common being fissure-like stress fractures (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998).<br />

2.6 Differential Diagnosis<br />

To summarize, these diseases are best differentiated by the profile of effects<br />

outlined in Appendix A. Treponemal disease most often affects the skull, hands, tibiae,<br />

fibulae, and feet of an infected individual. Tuberculosis most often affects the spine or<br />

vertebral column, causing collapse of the vertebral body(s) of an individual.<br />

Tuberculosis can also affect the skull, but unlike treponemal disease, there is usually only<br />

a single lesion affecting both the inner and outer tables with very little, if any, bony<br />

reaction and irregular margins that are destructive in nature (Mitchell 2003).<br />

Tuberculosis destroys bone while treponematosis produces new bone. Treponemal<br />

disease produces a general increased swelling of the diaphyses in long bones, whereas<br />

tuberculosis does not (Steinbock 1976). Treponemal disease produces multiple lesions, a<br />

larger area of involvement in the long bone shafts, an altered medullary cavity, an uneven<br />

cortex with bone formation and destruction unlike the changes seen in tuberculosis<br />

(Steinbock 1976).<br />

Leprosy affects the maxillary bone, palate, hands and feet of an individual<br />

through the resorption of bone. In treponemal disease there is a remodeling and<br />

formation of bone, whereas in tuberculosis and leprosy there is a resorption of bone.<br />

Treponemal disease can also affect the spine, but it affects the cervical vertebrae more<br />

35


commonly, whereas tuberculosis more commonly affects the thoracic and lumbar<br />

vertebrae.<br />

Other things to consider for a differential diagnosis between treponemal disease<br />

and tuberculosis or leprosy are the distribution of lesions within the population.<br />

Tuberculosis skeletal lesions are found in 1% of the population (Aufderheide and<br />

Rodríguez-Martín 1998), while periosteal reaction greater than 2% of the population is<br />

considered to be treponemal disease (Rothschild et al. 2004). Proliferative lesions are not<br />

as common in leprosy because of the resorption of bone and leprosy only affects 5% of<br />

the skeleton (Ortner 2003). A higher frequency of skeletal involvement should indicate a<br />

treponemal disease. Nonvenereal treponemal disease has the highest population<br />

frequency (20-40%) that involves periosteal reaction (Rothschild 2000). No other disease<br />

has a population frequency this high involving periosteal reaction. Venereal syphilis has<br />

a low population frequency (14% or less) and because of this reason it is harder to<br />

differentiate from other diseases when considering lesions within the skeleton of an<br />

individual (Ibid.).<br />

Osteosarcoma involves only one bone, while treponemal disease occurs bilaterally<br />

in long bones and in older individuals (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998;<br />

Steinbock 1976). Meningioma affects the skull, never the postcranial skeleton<br />

(Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Meningioma produces a thickening of the<br />

inner and outer tables of the skull and also a widening of the diploë, unlike treponemal<br />

disease (Steinbock 1976). Metastatic carcinoma lesions are usually small, not necrotic<br />

and regeneration of the bone does not occur. Unlike treponemal disease these lesions are<br />

widely scattered and the lesions do not coalesce (Steinbock 1976). Treponemal disease<br />

36


forms new bone growth surrounding the lesions and treponemal disease also exhibits<br />

postcranial lesions (Kelley 1980). The lesions occurring in multiple myeloma are lytic<br />

lesions and they are smaller than the lesions occurring in treponemal disease<br />

(Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998). Steinbock (1976) states that the lesions<br />

occurring in multiple myeloma are smaller, not necrotic, do not regenerate the bone and<br />

are widely scattered lesions that do not coalesce, which is unlike those lesions seen in<br />

treponemal disease. Kelley (1980) adds that in treponemal disease there is a formation of<br />

new bone that surrounds the lesions and that the lesions of treponemal disease also occur<br />

in the postcranial skeleton.<br />

Pyogenic (pus-producing) osteomyelitis usually involves fewer bones than<br />

treponemal disease. Osteomyelitis also produces the characteristic sequestrum,<br />

involucrum, and cloaca in the postcranial skeleton, whereas in treponemal disease these<br />

pathologic changes are rarely observed (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998;<br />

Steinbock 1976). Osteomyelitis usually does not involve the cranium, whereas<br />

treponemal disease does (Steinbock 1976). Kelley (1980) states that osteomyelitis is<br />

more destructive than treponemal disease, involving joints more often.<br />

Paget’s disease produces massive thickening of the skull vault, while in<br />

treponemal disease there is bone formation and bone loss that produces hills and valleys,<br />

not an extreme expansion of the diploë (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998).<br />

Histologic examination of the bones also reveals the mosaic pattern of Paget’s disease<br />

that is not found in treponemal disease (Steinbock 1976). Kelley (1980) states that<br />

Paget’s disease and treponemal disease differ in the age of onset and that Paget’s disease<br />

is a localized infection that lacks cloacae, whereas treponemal disease is widespread and<br />

37


may occasionally possess cloacae in the postcranial skeleton. Paget’s disease can<br />

produce periosteal reaction but the frequency is never greater than 1% in individuals<br />

under the age of 40 years (Rothschild 2005). In Paget’s disease, cortical thickening of<br />

the tibia occurs on the posterior portion, while in treponemal disease, cortical thickening<br />

occurs on the anterior portion of the tibia (Ibid.).<br />

2.7 Objectives<br />

In summary, there are several hypotheses revolving around the geographic origins<br />

and development of treponemal disease. Did it originate in the New World or the Old<br />

World? Was Columbus’ voyage responsible for bringing it to Europe, where it became<br />

more virulent? Has it always been present in the genus Homo and migrated with humans<br />

as they moved to new lands? Is it one disease that transforms depending upon the<br />

environment and social factors of the human host or is it several different organisms that<br />

are very similar?<br />

Treponemal disease leaves markers on the bones that may be similar to other<br />

diseases. These other diseases are tuberculosis, leprosy, tumors, osteomyelitis, and<br />

Paget’s disease. Looking at the distribution of lesions within a skeleton and the<br />

prevalence of lesions at the population level helps to differentiate between the different<br />

diseases that affect the bones.<br />

In the pages to come, through the study of an early (Archaic) prehistoric<br />

population in North America, the Carrier Mills sample from Southern Illinois, these<br />

questions will be addressed; 1) Is there a treponemal disease within this sample?; 2) If<br />

38


there is a treponemal disease, then which one is it?; 3) What does this study tell us about<br />

the lifestyle of this population?; and 4) What does this mean in terms of the history and<br />

origin of treponematoses?<br />

39


CHAPTER 3<br />

MATERIAL <strong>AND</strong> METHODS<br />

3.1 Materials<br />

3.1.1 The Sample – Carrier Mills Archaeological District<br />

The focus of my research was on the human skeletal remains recovered from the<br />

Carrier Mills Archaeological District, which is located in southern Illinois, in Saline<br />

County, 2.5 km south of the village of Carrier Mills and north of the South Fork of the<br />

Saline River (see Figure 3.1) (Jefferies and Morrow 1982). Excavation of the site was<br />

performed in 1978 and 1979 by the Center for Archaeological Investigations at Southern<br />

Illinois University, Carbondale (Jefferies and Morrow 1982). There are three major sites;<br />

11SA86, 11SA87, 11SA88, and several smaller sites within the 57 hectares of the district.<br />

The Black Earth site (11SA87) is the largest and most complex site (Jefferies and<br />

Morrow 1982) and it is the site that contains the human skeletal remains examined in this<br />

research. There are three main areas within the Black Earth site: A, B, and C (see Figure<br />

3.2). The skeletons examined in this study are from Area A, which produced the most<br />

burials, with 201 burial features containing 223 individuals (Jefferies 1982b). Some of<br />

the burials were located in the plow zone and were severely disturbed, while the majority<br />

of the burials were recovered from the midden zone, which was undisturbed and located<br />

in the central portion of Area A. Most burials date from the Middle Archaic (4500-3000<br />

40


BC) to Late Archaic (3000-1000 BC) periods, but a few have been identified as<br />

Woodland period burials (1000 BC – AD 1000) (Jefferies and Morrow 1982).<br />

Skeletal preservation for both the Archaic and Woodland period groups is good to<br />

excellent as a result of the soil having a high pH level and a good drainage system. The<br />

soil also contained high carbonate concentrations that slowed deterioration of the bone,<br />

but left hard deposits on the surfaces of the bones (Bassett 1982). These deposits<br />

hindered both the initial analysis conducted by Bassett (1982) and the research conducted<br />

here.<br />

3.1.2 Burial Sample<br />

The burial sample of the Black Earth site (11SA87) has been dated using<br />

radiocarbon dating techniques. Eight charcoal samples were analyzed from undisturbed<br />

features within the Area A midden. The samples were collected based on their specific<br />

vertical positions, so that midden deposition rates could be calculated (Bassett 1982).<br />

These charcoal samples produced dates ranging from 3955 to 2910 B.C. (Jefferies<br />

1982a). It is believed that the inhabitants occupied this area from approximately 4000<br />

B.C. to 2900 B.C., due to the dates revealed from the radiocarbon dating (Bassett 1982).<br />

The inhabitants were hunter-gatherers who were becoming more accustomed to a<br />

sedentary lifestyle, which implies that there was also a gradual increase in the population<br />

over time. An increase in population also results in an increase in plant and animal<br />

species found in archaeological sites. For these reasons, the Archaic period has been<br />

characterized as having an “increasing regional specialization and adaptation marked by<br />

the appearance of large, intensively occupied sites” (Jefferies and Morrow 1982;19), and<br />

41


it is also a time when specialized tool forms begin to appear. There is evidence within<br />

this Archaic period site of multiseasonal occupation, meaning that this site was probably<br />

occupied year-round instead of being a seasonal camp that depended upon the<br />

environment and availability of foods (Jefferies and Morrow 1982). The increase in<br />

population size along with multiseasonal occupation also suggests that since people were<br />

staying in one place for long periods of time, they had to have a place to bury their dead.<br />

Therefore, the Archaic period is also the time in which we begin to see archaeological<br />

evidence for an increase in the use of cemeteries.<br />

Everett J. Bassett (1982) performed the original osteological analysis on all of the<br />

Carrier Mills burials (approximately 500 burials). This analysis took place between the<br />

years of 1980 and 1982. The general descriptions of the burials as described by Bassett<br />

(1982) can be found in Appendix F of The Carrier Mills Archaeological Project: Human<br />

Adaptation in the Saline Valley, Illinois, Volume 2. This appendix includes the burial<br />

number, cultural affiliation, sex, age group category, estimated age of the individual,<br />

preservation/completeness evaluation of the remains, osteitis evaluation, and any other<br />

pathological information that was observed by Bassett (1982).<br />

Area A contains 237 individuals with 157 dating to the Archaic (4000 – 2900<br />

B.C.) period, 35 from the Woodland (1000 B.C. – A.D. 1000) period, and 45 are of<br />

undetermined date (but either Archaic or Woodland). Of the total Archaic period sample,<br />

there are 51 juveniles, 54 males, 47 females and 5 individuals that are of undetermined<br />

sex. Within the juvenile sample, there are 46 infants (birth to 3 yrs), 4 children (3 to 12<br />

yrs), and 1 adolescent (12 to 20 yrs). There are an additional 6 adolescents (12 to 20 yrs)<br />

whose skeletal remains were complete enough to determine sex and are included in the<br />

42


data for males and females instead of juveniles. Of the adult sample, there are 45 young<br />

adults (20 to 35 yrs), 49 middle adults (35 to 50 yrs) and 6 old adults (>50+ yrs) within<br />

this sample. Males outnumber females in a ratio of 1.5:1.<br />

A “treponemal-like” infection has been identified within this skeletal sample<br />

(Bassett 1982). Individuals in the sample exhibit some characteristics that are associated<br />

with treponemal disease, but these traits may also be associated with other diseases,<br />

particularly tuberculosis (Bassett 1982). Bassett (1982) found periosteal involvement,<br />

lytic lesions, and saber-shins throughout this sample. The most common bones affected<br />

were the long bones and the cranium, but the ribs, vertebrae, scapulae, clavicles, and<br />

bones of the hands and feet were also affected. He used osteitis as a general term to<br />

describe all bone inflammation, but because it was so widespread, he developed a rating<br />

system of slight, moderate and severe to help in the analysis (Bassett 1982).<br />

Osteitis indicates that an infection was present at the time of death. In Bassett’s<br />

(1982) terminology and analysis, ‘slight’ osteitis meant that the infection is present on the<br />

anterior portion of the tibiae; it may also be present on the fibulae, posterior tibiae and the<br />

anterior femora with slight periosteal remodeling distinguishable. Bassett’s (1982)<br />

category of ‘moderate’ osteitis meant that the infection is also present on the posterior<br />

femora, the humeri, radii, ulnae, clavicles, metatarsals, metacarpals, and maybe even the<br />

ribs, with saber-shin (an anterior bowing of the tibiae) being noticeable. Bassett’s (1982)<br />

category of ‘severe’ osteitis indicated obvious saber-shin, deep lesions visible on the<br />

tibiae, other long bones and the cranium.<br />

Previous research of the human skeletal remains from the Carrier Mills<br />

Archaeological District includes: Miller (1981) on postcranial nonmetric traits, Larsen<br />

43


(1981) on the relationships between the stress indicators of Harris lines and dental<br />

asymmetry, Brandon (1986) on dietary inferences through dental analysis, Anderson<br />

(1998) on measuring stress through tibial growth patterns in juveniles, Van Arsdale<br />

(1998) on the sexual division of labor through the patterns of vertebral osteoarthritis, and<br />

Clapper (2006) on activities based on musculoskeletal stress markers. This research will<br />

explore the tentatively identified treponemal disease within the Archaic period group.<br />

3.2 Methods<br />

This study was conducted in 2006-2007 at the Center for Archaeological<br />

Investigations curation facility in Carbondale, Illinois, where the sample from Area A of<br />

the Black Earth site of the Carrier Mills Archaeological District is housed. The entire<br />

sample of Area A individuals was sorted according to cultural affiliation (e.g. Woodland<br />

[1000 BC – AD 1000] or Archaic [4000 – 2900 BC] periods). The Archaic period<br />

sample of 157 individuals was then sorted numerically according to burial number. The<br />

sub-sample (54 individuals) that was visually examined were the first 54 individuals<br />

excavated from the Archaic period. Table 3.1 gives the categories (e.g. infants, young<br />

adults, males, females, etc.) and the percentages of the individuals in the total sample<br />

(157) versus the percentages of individuals from the sub-sample (54). Also compared<br />

from the total sample and the sub-sample in this Table are the numbers of males, females,<br />

and juveniles, the numbers of individuals diagnosed by Bassett (1982) as having slight,<br />

moderate, severe, and no osteitis, and the number of burials that were considered to be<br />

complete based on a rating of 1, 2, and 3 with 1 being the least complete and 3 being the<br />

44


most complete. As can be seen from Table 3.1, the percentages of males, females,<br />

juveniles, and undetermined from the sub-sample are nearly equivalent to those of the<br />

entire sample. The percentage that is lacking the most is that of the juveniles.<br />

Figure 3.3 is a map of the Archaic period burials. This map indicates that the<br />

burials were widely distributed throughout the entire Stratum 1 area of the site, the core<br />

area. The central and western portions of the Stratum 1 layer of Area A contain the most<br />

burials. This map contains all but five individuals from the sub-sample (54) used in this<br />

study. On the original map of all of the Archaic burials, there were a few outliers to the<br />

North, South and West along the trenches for this site. This map has been cropped to<br />

show a closer view of the densest concentration of burials, or the core area of the site.<br />

Another reason why the map lacks the total number of Archaic burials (157) is that some<br />

burials were left out of the initial analysis by Lynch (1982) due to preservation issues.<br />

Only 124 burials were analyzed and plotted on the map. It is apparent that by sampling<br />

the first 54 individuals, the subsample included individuals widely distributed across the<br />

site except in the southeast quandrant. There was nothing distinct or different about the<br />

site preservation, burial context, or mixture of individuals in that quadrant (Brian Butler,<br />

personal communication).<br />

Bassett’s (1982) age assessment for the juveniles was based on five criteria:<br />

dental calcification, occipital development, long bone length, dental eruption, and the<br />

union of epiphyses. Each individual was also assigned an approximate error factor<br />

depending on the estimated age of the individual (Bassett 1982). Sex determination was<br />

not attempted for the juveniles.<br />

45


Adult age estimation, as assessed by Bassett (1982), was based on five criteria of<br />

progressive changes in the human skeleton. These changes occur in areas of the auricular<br />

surface, pubic symphysis, cranial suture closure, functional dental wear, and involution of<br />

the cortical and trabecular bone of the proximal femur. The most useful indicators were<br />

the auricular surface, because it has the most variation and is preserved more frequently<br />

in the Carrier Mills sample, followed by the pubic symphysis, the second most preserved<br />

indicator in the sample (Bassett 1982). Adults missing all of the aging indicators due to<br />

poor preservation were separated into 3 different age categories: 18-35 years, 35+ years,<br />

and 18+ years depending on the amount of skeletal degeneration related to age. Each<br />

individual was also assigned an approximate error factor depending on the estimated age<br />

of the individual (Ibid.).<br />

Sex indicators utilized by Bassett (1982) for the adults were the characteristics of<br />

the pelvis, skull, and postcranial robusticity. The most useful indicators are those of the<br />

pelvis. Three non-metric methods were used for the pelvis: “1) the ventral arc of the<br />

pubis, the subpubic concavity, and the medial aspect of the ischiopubic ramus, 2) the<br />

sciatic notch, and 3) the feminine preauricular sulcus” (Bassett 1982:1039). The<br />

characteristics of the skull utilized to indicate the sex of the individuals were:<br />

“1) development of the nuchal ridges, 2) presence or absence of the external<br />

occipital protuberance, 3) mastoid size, 4) robusticity of the mandible, and 5)<br />

presence and size of the supraorbital ridges” (Bassett 1982:1039).<br />

46


Individuals with ambiguous, contradictory, incomplete, or poorly preserved<br />

characteristics were assigned Male (?), Female (?), or just a simple (?).<br />

A sub-sample of 54 individuals from the Archaic (4000 – 2900 B.C.) period<br />

sample was examined, in this study. Of the 54 individuals, nine are infants (birth to 3<br />

yrs), two are adolescents (12 to 20 yrs), nineteen are young adults (20 to 35 yrs), twenty<br />

are middle adults (35 to 50 yrs), and four are old adults (>50+ yrs). These age categories<br />

follow the standard age categories as described by Buikstra and Ubelaker (1994). There<br />

are twenty-six males: 1 adolescent, 12 young adults, 12 middle adults, and 1 old adult;<br />

seventeen females: 1 adolescent, 6 young adults, 7 middle adults, 3 old adults; nine<br />

juveniles, and two individuals of undetermined sex: 1 young adult and 1 middle adult,<br />

which results in the same ratio of 1.5 males to 1 female as that seen in the entire sample.<br />

Here, Bassett’s (1982) determination of sex and age were used as a reference<br />

point for the specimens and initial estimate. However, Bassett’s work was not tightly<br />

focused, due to his research being broad, including determining such factors as sex, age,<br />

disease, demography, growth, stature, dating techniques and a general description of the<br />

burials from the entire Carrier Mills Archaeological District, which consists of nearly 500<br />

skeletons. Therefore, his sex determination and age estimates were reevaluated, resulting<br />

in some changes during this analysis.<br />

Of the 54 individuals in this research, the sex determination for five of them was<br />

changed. Burials 45, 66, 84, 86, and 89 were originally identified as male, but were<br />

reclassified as female based upon wide sciatic notches, small mastoids, and complete<br />

perforation of the olecranon fossa of the humerus. Age categories were also changed for<br />

eight of the 54 individuals. Burials 29, 45, and 94, originally categorized as young<br />

47


adults, were changed to middle adults. Burial 50 was originally a middle adult and was<br />

changed to a young adult. Burials 66, 100, and 114, originally adolescents, were changed<br />

to young adults. Burial 103, a middle adult in Bassett's analysis, was reclassified as an<br />

old adult. These changes were not due to altered estimates of absolute age but to<br />

reconsiderations of the age ranges in each category. For example, Burial 29 was<br />

originally classified as a young adult (20-35), but upon examination of the age of the<br />

individual, which was determined to be approximately 44 years of age, this individual<br />

was reclassified as a middle adult (35-50).<br />

During the examination, data were entered into an Excel database using the<br />

skeletal code key, following the Standards For Data Collection manual (Buikstra and<br />

Ubelaker 1994). The following information was recorded in the Data Collection<br />

Worksheet: burial number, skeletal element, side, section, aspect, pathology, lesion<br />

location and lesion type. Also noted in the database are additional observations on<br />

diagrams, sketches of where the lesions occur if any, photographs taken of the<br />

pathological changes, and any comments regarding the examination.<br />

The teeth of the nine infants were visually examined, particularly the permanent<br />

incisors and permanent first molars, for the characteristic changes of congenital syphilis,<br />

including Hutchinson’s incisors, Mulberry molars and Moon’s molars. The canines were<br />

examined for evidence of hypoplasias as well. The teeth of the adults were also<br />

examined for pathological changes.<br />

Any abnormal shape in bone, size and formation, and bone loss specific to<br />

treponemal infection was recorded. All bones presenting these features were set aside,<br />

labeled and photographed. Photographs were taken throughout the data collection and at<br />

48


the conclusion of the analysis. A Nikon Coolpix 7600 digital camera was used,<br />

uploading images into a computer with each image assigned a number, and the number<br />

recorded in the database.<br />

3.3 Summary<br />

In summary, one third of the Archaic period skeletal sample of the Carrier Mills<br />

Archaeological District was examined, specifically those of the Black Earth site, for<br />

evidence of treponemal disease. These data were then used to address the following two<br />

questions: 1) Is there evidence of a treponemal disease within this sample? and 2) If there<br />

is a treponemal disease, which one is it?<br />

To determine if there is a treponemal disease in the Carrier Mills skeletal sample,<br />

twenty-eight different pathological features were first examined. After determining the<br />

presence and absence of these features, it was decided that five primary features should<br />

be used to determine the likelihood of treponemal disease within this sample. The five<br />

primary traits/markers were decided upon after consulting Ortner (2003) and Bogdan and<br />

Weaver’s (1992) diagram showing the distribution of the most frequent sites of skeletal<br />

lesions due to treponematoses. These five primary markers are 1) cranial 2) hand 3) tibial<br />

4) fibular and 5) foot involvement.<br />

To answer the question of which treponemal disease is present in this sample, a<br />

differential diagnosis based on a profile of the effect of treponematoses on populations<br />

used by Rothschild et al. (2000) was utilized. This profile highlights the differences<br />

between yaws, endemic syphilis, and venereal syphilis through the comparison of cases<br />

49


with confirmed disease. The differences include: hand and foot involvement, adult<br />

versus juvenile, and the average number of bone groups affected. In order to examine<br />

these questions, the data were summarized based on presence of periosteal and other<br />

lesions by: age group, sex, bones included, and uni- or bilaterality. The results of this<br />

study are presented in the following chapters.<br />

50


Category<br />

Table 3.1. Carrier Mills Archaic Burials Statistics<br />

Total Sample<br />

(157)<br />

Sub-Sample<br />

(54)<br />

Total % of total Total<br />

% of<br />

total<br />

Infants 46 29% 9 17%<br />

Children 4 3% 0 0%<br />

Adolescents 7 4% 2 4%<br />

Young Adults 45 29% 19 35%<br />

Middle Adults 49 31% 20 37%<br />

Old Adults 6 4% 4 7%<br />

Total Adults 100 64% 43 80%<br />

Total Juveniles 57 36% 11 20%<br />

Males 54 34% 26 48%<br />

Females 47 30% 17 31%<br />

Juveniles, unsexed 51 32% 9 17% if rest of sample<br />

Undetermined 5 3% 2 4% with no osteitis*:<br />

Slight Osteitis 49 31% 23 43% 23/157 15%<br />

Moderate Osteitis 7 4% 7 13% 7/157 4%<br />

Severe Osteitis 1 1% 1 1% 1/157 1%<br />

No Osteitis 100 64% 23 43% 123/157 78%<br />

Complete 1 (least) 27 17% 5 9%<br />

Complete 2 60 38% 15 28%<br />

Complete 3 (most) 70 45% 34 63%<br />

Total sample % of total = t/157*100<br />

Sub-sample % of total = t/54*100<br />

Total juveniles = Infants + Children + Adolescents<br />

Total adults = young adults + middle adults + old adults<br />

Males = all the males in the sample (adults and determined adolescents)<br />

Females = all the females in the sample (adults and determined adolescents)<br />

Juveniles = infants + children + undetermined adolescents<br />

* This is just an example of what the results of the study would be if the rest of the<br />

Carrier Mills Archaic burial sample were not infected with osteitis. This demonstrates<br />

that the percentage of osteitis found in this sample is still high (20%).<br />

51


Figure 3.1 Location of Carrier Mills Archaeological District in southern Illinois.<br />

Image adapted from Jefferies & Morrow 1982.<br />

52


Figure 3.2. Location of Carrier Mills Archaeological District Sites (SA86, SA87,<br />

SA88). Image adapted from Jefferies & Morrow 1982.<br />

53


Figure 3.3. Locations of Archaic burials by sex determination.<br />

Shaded burials indicate burials in this study. Adapted from Lynch 1982.<br />

54


CHAPTER 4<br />

RESULTS<br />

Appendix B provides a summary of the Burials exhibiting skeletal lesions that are<br />

possible treponemal characteristics for each of the 54 Carrier Mills Archaic individuals<br />

that were examined. The appendix contains the burial number, age/sex category of the<br />

individual, completeness of the skeleton, and degree of osteitis that the skeletal remains<br />

exhibit. Also contained in this appendix are the notes pertaining to the coding of the<br />

human skeletal remains as designated during this analysis.<br />

Of the total number of Archaic period skeletons, Bassett (1982) diagnosed 49<br />

with slight osteitis, seven with moderate osteitis, and one male with severe osteitis. Of<br />

the subsample of 54 individuals that were examined in this study, Bassett (1982)<br />

diagnosed 23 of them with slight osteitis (12 males, 10 females and 1 of undetermined<br />

sex), 7 with moderate osteitis (5 males and 2 females), 1 male with severe osteitis, and 23<br />

without any signs of osteitis. While the results presented here are similar in scope of<br />

affected individuals, there are some differences and a more detailed understanding of the<br />

pattern of affected bones.<br />

4.1 Likelihood of Treponemal Disease<br />

55


Determination of the presence or absence of a treponemal disease and which<br />

syndrome is present is based on the presence or absence of osteitis/periostitis changes in<br />

different bones and bone groups, by age, sex, and uni- or bilaterality. Tables 4.1 – 4.5<br />

provide an initial summary of the presence of osteitis or other pathological feature of<br />

each burial, by bone/bone group, and sex for each age group in the Carrier Mills Archaic<br />

sample. All the tables contain the burial number, estimated age in years of the individual,<br />

sex of the individual, and the presence, absence, or observability of the 28 different<br />

pathological markers used in this study. Markers falling into the five primary sets of<br />

features for distinguishing treponemal disease from other diseases are numbered and in<br />

bold. These five primary marker sets are: 1) cranial involvement; 2) hand involvement;<br />

3) tibial involvement; 4) fibular involvement; and 5) foot involvement. The tables also<br />

contain the number of pathological markers associated with each burial and the number<br />

of bone groups affected in each burial. Table 4.1 contains the information for the infants,<br />

Table 4.2 contains the adolescents, Table 4.3 consists of the young adults, Table 4.4 is the<br />

middle adults, and finally the old adults are in Table 4.5.<br />

By looking at Tables 4.1 – 4.5, it is immediately apparent that osteitis and related<br />

pathological lesions were widespread in this sample. The Totals column is the total<br />

number of individuals affected for each pathological marker. In Table 4.1 (Infants), of<br />

the 28 pathological markers, 17 are found on individual infants, while 11 are not. Of the<br />

17 markers found, 10 markers occur on four or more affected individuals. Table 4.2<br />

(Adolescents) shows that 17 of the 28 pathological markers are exhibited on individual<br />

juveniles. Table 4.3 (Young Adults) shows that 23 of the 28 pathological markers are<br />

exhibited on young adult skeletons; 6 of the pathological markers occur on 10 or more<br />

56


affected individuals. From Table 4.4 (Middle Adults), it is clear that 24 of the 28<br />

pathological markers occur on one or more of these skeletons, and 8 of the pathological<br />

markers are found on 10 or more affected individuals. Table 4.5 (Old Adults) shows that<br />

out of the 28 pathological markers, 18 affect old adult skeletons, with 13 of those<br />

affecting 2 or more individuals. This demonstrates that the skeletal remains for this sub-<br />

sample have a high frequency of bone infection.<br />

Table 4.6 contains a summary and the percentages of occurrence for these 28<br />

possible pathological markers (either osteitis on a bone/group or other feature) found<br />

within the sample. The data are broken down into the numbers of infants, adolescents,<br />

young adults, middle adults, and old adults possessing each marker, but since treponemal<br />

disease also affects males more than females, the numbers of males, females, and<br />

unknown (adults of undetermined sex) exhibiting each marker are also included.<br />

Percentages were calculated based on the number of individuals affected for the juveniles<br />

(infants + adolescents), adults, males and females relative to the number preserving that<br />

bone for this sample.<br />

The adults are affected considerably more than juveniles in this study (see Table<br />

4.6 and Figure 4.1). Focusing on the five primary markers, the cranium is affected far<br />

more in the adults (67%) than in the juveniles (36%). The hands are affected far more in<br />

the adult (72%) sample than in the juvenile (18%) sample. The bilateral tibiae are more<br />

affected in the adult (93%) versus the juvenile (100%) sample. The bilateral fibulae are<br />

affected in almost all individuals in which both are present, including 80% of the adults<br />

and 67% of the juveniles. Involvement of the feet is also seen considerably more in the<br />

adults (78%) than in the juveniles (43%).<br />

57


The results in Table 4.6 indicate that males are generally affected more in this<br />

sample than are females (see also Fig. 4.2). Although the frontal/parietal region is<br />

affected in fewer males (37%) than females (54%), nasal/palatal involvement was seen in<br />

38% of males, but no females. The hands are also affected more in males (75%) than in<br />

females (63%). Bilateral tibiae are affected in almost equal frequency in males (95%)<br />

and females (92%). Saber shin, however, is found in 29% of males, but no females.<br />

Bilateral fibulae involvement is again about the same in males (78%) than in females<br />

(77%). But the feet are affected far more in males (87%) than in females (67%). It is<br />

interesting that the male sample is affected more in the hands, feet and saber shin tibia<br />

deformity. This could be due to the absence of some of the skeletal elements or to<br />

observer error, but as reviewed earlier, treponemal disease generally affects males more<br />

than females (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998).<br />

The considerable differences in the adult versus the juvenile sample could be due<br />

to the frequent absence of hand and foot bones, tibiae, and fibulae in the juvenile sample.<br />

Table 4.6 further demonstrates the high level of occurrence of many pathological markers<br />

indicative of a treponemal infection, in addition to the five primary markers (in bold),<br />

although some (particularly dental features) are conspicuously lacking. While the<br />

absence of dental markers could be due to missing permanent incisors and first molars or<br />

to attrition in some cases, it may also be indicative that this infection could be<br />

nonvenereal in nature. Nonvenereal treponemal disease does not affect the teeth.<br />

Table 4.7 is a summary of the likelihood of the Carrier Mills Archaic burial sub-<br />

sample suffering from treponemal disease. Listed are the numbers of burials with a<br />

rating system as follows: ‘none’, ‘possible’, ‘highly likely’ and ‘certain’ for suffering<br />

58


from treponemal disease. The ratings are based on the five primary markers of cranial,<br />

hands, tibiae, fibulae, and feet involvement. Thus, if a burial did not exhibit<br />

osteitis/pathology for any of these five primary areas, the individual was scored not to<br />

have a treponemal disease (“None”). If a burial had involvement in one, two or three of<br />

these areas, the individual was considered to have “Possible” treponemal disease. If a<br />

burial exhibited involvement in four or five of these areas, then it was considered to be<br />

“Highly Likely” that the individual had a treponemal disease. A “Certain” for<br />

treponemal disease was coded if the individual possessed all five of the markers, had<br />

lesions that perforated the cortex, and had the saber shin deformity. If an individual had<br />

fewer than five of the primary markers, but exhibited the saber shin deformity, that<br />

individual was also considered ‘certain’ for treponemal disease. As has been noted, most<br />

of the individuals in this study exhibited infection of the bone on at least one or more<br />

elements. Almost all of the 11% of individuals categorized as ‘none’ had at least one<br />

bone with osteitis , but since none of the primary marker elements were affected, they<br />

were placed in the category of ‘none’. A visual summary of the likelihood of treponemal<br />

disease in the Carrier Mills individuals is shown in Figure 4.3. Below is a discussion of<br />

the individuals included in each of the likelihood categories based on the five primary<br />

marker sets. In discussing individual burials, they will be abbreviated as Burial = B +<br />

number (Burial 38 = B38).<br />

4.1.1 Certain<br />

Six individuals (11% of the sample) were diagnosed as ‘certain’ for treponemal<br />

disease, and all of these were males. The most severe case exhibited all 5 characteristic<br />

59


markers on the skeleton, had lesions perforating the cortex, and had saber shin tibiae.<br />

B38 is a middle adult male approximately 40 years old, previously diagnosed as severe<br />

osteitis (Bassett 1982). This unfortunate individual had lesions on his entire skeleton. Of<br />

the five primary markers used for diagnosis of the skeletons, this individual possessed<br />

pathological lesions in all 5 areas of the skeleton: crania, hands, tibiae, fibulae, and feet<br />

involvement. This individual also exhibited saber shin deformity of the tibia, which was<br />

a bilateral phenomenon.<br />

The cranium of B38 exhibits lesions on the frontal, left parietal, left maxilla, left<br />

and right mandible, right nasal, left and right lacrimal, and occipital bones. The frontal<br />

contains 8 lytic lesions ranging in size from


also affected. These were all in the forms of lesions. Figure 4.5 is the left third<br />

metacarpal showing one lesion surrounded by woven bone.<br />

The tibiae of B38 exhibit bilateral lesions. The right tibia has approximately 10<br />

lesions on the surface that perforate the cortex. They range in size from ~0.5 cm to 1.5<br />

cm wide. Eight of them are surrounded by woven and sclerotic reaction. This tibia also<br />

exhibits the most prominent marker of treponemal disease, the saber shin. Figure 4.6<br />

shows the right tibia, posterior midshaft with six lesions surrounded by woven and<br />

sclerotic reaction. The left tibia also has approximately 10 lesions on the surface that<br />

perforate the cortex. They range in size from 1 to 1.5 cm long. Woven and sclerotic<br />

reaction also surrounds eight of them, and it also has the saber shin characteristic.<br />

The fibulae of B38 both exhibit lesions, woven bone, and a sclerotic reaction.<br />

The right fibula is bowed medio-laterally and it has five lesions, which are all<br />

approximately 1.5 cm long. The left fibula has one long lesion (~11 cm in length) that is<br />

best described as a cloaca that is surrounded by sclerotic reaction. Figure 4.7 is a closeup<br />

of the lateral left fibula showing the cloacae and the surrounding sclerotic reaction.<br />

The feet of B38 are severely infected. Of the tarsals, the right side is affected.<br />

The calcaneus has lesions and osteophytes. All the metatarsals of both feet are affected.<br />

The right metatarsals have lesions and woven bone. The first metatarsal is fused with the<br />

first phalanges. The left metatarsals are swollen with woven bone and sclerotic reaction,<br />

trabecular coarsening and cortical thinning. Figure 4.8 shows the plantar surface of the<br />

first left metatarsal showing woven and sclerotic reaction.<br />

The other five burials are not as severely affected as B38. These five burials are<br />

B104, B25, B48, B33 and B65. B104 is a middle adult male of 46 years exhibiting<br />

61


involvement of all of the five primary markers and the characteristic saber shin<br />

deformity. In the hands, the metacarpals exhibit bone loss, woven bone and deposition of<br />

bone. The hand phalanges also exhibit deposition of bone and bone loss. The carpals<br />

exhibit bone loss as well. The tibiae have woven bone and sclerotic response anteriorly<br />

as well as striations medially. The left tibia has two lesions on the lateral surface at the<br />

proximal end and the saber shin deformity. The right tibia has one lesion proximal<br />

laterally and also has the saber shin deformity. The fibulae also exhibit woven bone and<br />

sclerotic response along with striations on the entire shafts. The foot phalanges have bone<br />

deposition and loss.<br />

B25, a young adult male of 33 years, shows involvement of the hands, tibiae, and<br />

fibulae. The hands have woven bone on the phalanges along with bony growths. The<br />

metacarpals are misshapen, like they have been twisted. The right tibia has a<br />

concentration of woven bone on the anterior midshaft along with the saber shin<br />

deformity. The left tibia has striations, osteitis, and the saber shin deformity.<br />

B48 is a young adult male, aged 20-35 years, possessing markers on the tibiae,<br />

fibulae, and feet. The right tibia exhibits striations on the shaft medially and the saber<br />

shin deformity. The left tibia has striations medially on the shaft and has a patch of<br />

woven bone on the distal 1/3 of the shaft along the postero-medial surface, as well as the<br />

saber shin deformity. Both fibulae exhibit striations along the entire shaft. In the feet,<br />

the tarsals have bone loss and the fifth intermediate and distal phalanges are fused on one<br />

foot (side unclear).<br />

B33 is a middle adult male, 35 years of age. This particular individual has<br />

involvement of the palate, hands, tibiae, fibulae, and feet. There is pitting on the palate.<br />

62


Three hand phalanges exhibit unifocal bone loss. The right tibia exhibits a slight saber<br />

shin, with both tibiae having striations on the medial shaft but no apparent thick spongy<br />

growth on either tibia. The fibulae have striations on the shaft and are flattened, while<br />

the right fibula has sclerotic reaction on the medial surface of the distal shaft. The<br />

metatarsals have bone loss and woven bone present. Both ulnae are bowed at the distal<br />

end.<br />

B65 is a middle adult male of 49 years who exhibits involvement of the hands,<br />

tibiae, fibulae, and feet. The intermediate and proximal hand phalanges look swollen and<br />

have spicules along the shafts. The right tibia has the saber shin deformity, a thick<br />

spongy patch of bone on the medial surface of the proximal end, and striations on the<br />

medial shaft. The left tibia is missing. The fibula is not smooth, but exhibits osteitis that<br />

is bubbly in appearance. The metatarsals have bone loss, woven and sclerotic reaction on<br />

the shafts. Both ulnae and radii are bowed on the distal end.<br />

4.1.2 Highly Likely<br />

Out of the 54 individuals examined, 15 (28%) were scored as ‘highly likely’ for<br />

displaying pathological lesions consistent with treponemal disease. One of the infants fit<br />

into this category with four of the primary markers. B32 (age 0.8 yrs) had cranial, tibial,<br />

fibular, and foot involvement. On the cranium, the left orbit exhibits extensive woven<br />

bone, while the left temporal also has extensive woven bone present. The tibiae from<br />

B32 exhibit woven bone, as well as the fibulae. One of the adolescents, B89 (female, 16<br />

years), had four of the five primary markers, including involvement of the hands, tibiae,<br />

fibulae, and feet.<br />

63


Of the young adults, three were ranked as ‘highly likely’ for having treponemal<br />

disease, with each having four of the five primary markers. These three burials are B35,<br />

B82, and B84. B35 (male, 21 years) had involvement of the crania, hands, tibiae, and<br />

feet. B82 (undetermined sex, 25 years) had involvement of the hands, tibiae, fibulae, and<br />

feet. B84 (female, 29 years) had involvement of the crania, hand, tibiae, and fibulae.<br />

Six of the middle adults were ‘highly likely’ to have been affected by treponemal<br />

disease. Four of these burials had four primary markers, B7, B91, B99, and B110. B7<br />

(female, 47 years) exhibited involvement of the crania, hands, tibiae, and feet. B99<br />

(female, 35 years), and B110 (male, 36 years) both exhibited involvement of the hands,<br />

tibiae, fibulae, and feet. B91 (male, 42 years) had involvement of the crania, hands,<br />

tibiae, and fibulae. The other two burials had five of the primary markers, B86 (female,<br />

35 years), and B93 (male, 42 years). Although B86 and B93 possessed all five traits,<br />

they were not categorized as certain for having a treponemal disease because neither of<br />

them showed signs of saber tibia.<br />

All four of the old adults were categorized as ‘highly likely’ for suffering from<br />

treponemal disease. B1 (female, 56 years), and B4 (female, 58 years) possessed all five<br />

primary markers, but again they were not categorized as ‘certain’ for having a treponemal<br />

disease because neither of them showed signs of saber tibia. The other two burials, B51<br />

(male, 51 years), and B103 (female, 53 years), both had involvement of four of the<br />

primary markers: hands, tibiae, fibulae, and feet.<br />

4.1.3 Possible<br />

64


The majority of the individuals in this study were considered ‘possible’ for<br />

treponemal disease (28 out of 54, or 52%). Individuals with one, two or three of the five<br />

primary marker sets were categorized as ‘possible’ for having suffered from treponemal<br />

disease. Of the infants examined, five were scored as ‘possible’ cases for treponemal<br />

disease. B77 (1.3 years) had hand involvement, while B30 (0.2 years) and B40 (0.6<br />

years) both had cranial involvement. B62 (0.4 years) had cranial and tibial involvement,<br />

while B87 (0.8 years) had tibial and fibular involvement. One of the two adolescents was<br />

scored as ‘possible’ for suffering from treponemal disease. B116 is a male of<br />

approximately 16 years of age. He possessed two of the primary markers; involvement<br />

of the fibulae and feet.<br />

Twelve of the young adults were scored as ‘possible’ for suffering from<br />

treponemal disease. Three young adults all exhibited only one of the primary marker<br />

sets. B39 (male, 22 years) and B109 (female, 21 years) both had hand involvement. B83<br />

(female, 20 years) had tibial involvement. B69 (male, 29 years) possessed two of the<br />

primary markers, involvement of the hands and feet. The other eight of the young adults<br />

all possessed three of the five primary markers. B66 (female, 21 years) had cranial,<br />

tibial, and fibular involvement. B105 (male, 27 years) had involvement of the hands,<br />

fibulae, and feet. B50 (male, 34 years), B95 (male, 34 years), and B100 (male, 20+<br />

years), B111 (female, 22 years), B113 (male, 26 years), and B114 (male, 20 years) all<br />

possessed markers on the tibiae, fibulae, and feet.<br />

Ten of the middle adults were scored as ‘possible’ cases of treponemal disease.<br />

Four of these ten possessed two of the primary markers. B29 (male, 44 years) had cranial<br />

and tibiae involvement. B85 (female, 40 years) had involvement of the fibulae and feet.<br />

65


B94 (undetermined sex, 44 years) had involvement of the hand and foot. B121 (male, 39<br />

years) had cranial and hand involvement. The other six individuals all had three of the<br />

five primary markers. B17 (female, 50 years) exhibited involvement of the tibiae,<br />

fibulae, and feet. B45 (female, 37 years), B49 (male, 46 years), and B72 (male, 38 years)<br />

all suffered from hand, tibiae, and fibulae involvement. B106 (female, 47 years) had<br />

cranial, tibiae, and fibulae involvement, while B124 (male, 42 years) exhibited<br />

involvement of the hands, tibiae, and feet.<br />

4.1.4 None<br />

Of the 54 individuals examined, 5 (9%) were scored as having no signs of<br />

treponemal disease, although these individuals did exhibit infection. Of the infants<br />

examined, B21 (1.7 years), B46 (0.1 years), and B63 (0.4 years) did not contain any of<br />

the five primary markers and therefore were scored as ‘none’ for having treponemal<br />

disease. Two of the young adults were scored as ‘none’ for suffering from treponemal<br />

disease. B3 (male, 27 years) and B41 (female, 18-35 years) did not have any of the five<br />

primary markers.<br />

4.1.5 Differential Diagnosis and Summary<br />

There are five other diseases that have often been difficult to differentiate from<br />

treponemal disease in prehistoric populations: tuberculosis, leprosy, tumors,<br />

osteomyelitis, and Paget’s disease (see Chapter 2 for specific descriptions).<br />

As reviewed above, tuberculosis affects the spine of individuals; more than 40%<br />

of the skeletal lesions are seen in the spine (Aufderheide and Rodríguez-Martín 1998).<br />

66


Most commonly the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae are affected. Collapse of the vertebral<br />

column may occur, usually involving, but not limited to, two or three vertebrae. The hip,<br />

knee and ribs may also be affected (Ibid.). In this study, some of the cervical, thoracic<br />

and lumbar vertebrae are affected in all of the age categories. The vertebrae that are<br />

affected do not have abscesses that progress horizontally to cause collapse of the<br />

vertebral body. Most of the vertebrae exhibit signs of degenerative arthritis and, in some<br />

cases, Schmorl’s nodes. Cranial involvement is generally characteristic of treponemal<br />

disease and not tuberculosis. In tuberculosis a single lesion that affects the inner and<br />

outer tables is often seen. This lesion is not accompanied by any bony reaction. In the<br />

cranial lesions observed in this study, there are multiple lesions affecting the outer table<br />

and they are accompanied by bony reaction.<br />

Leprosy (Lepromatous) most often affects the face in individuals (see Chapter 2).<br />

It causes a resorption of bone in the nasal spine. Leprosy also causes erosion of the<br />

maxillary bone and the palate, and it also affects the hands and feet. In this study, none<br />

of the individuals exhibited resorption of the nasal spine or of the vertebral column. The<br />

hands and feet of the individuals in this study were affected, but resorption of the distal<br />

phalanges of the hands was not seen, nor was the diagnostic club-shaped foot of leprosy<br />

recognizable in the feet of the individuals in the Carrier Mills sample.<br />

The lesions occurring in the individuals of this study also do not fit the profile<br />

outlined above (Chapter 2) for various tumors. Osteosarcoma involves only one bone,<br />

meningioma never affects the postcranial skeleton, metastatic carcinoma and multiple<br />

myeloma produce small lesions without regeneration of bone and the lesions are not<br />

necrotic. The individuals in this study have lesions that are large, surrounded by<br />

67


egeneration of bone with some necrosis, and the lesions are multiple affecting the cranial<br />

and postcranial skeleton.<br />

Osteomyelitis produces sequestra, involucra, and cloaca in the postcranial<br />

skeleton and does not usually affect the cranium. In this study no sequestra or involucra<br />

were observed, and the cranium is affected in some individuals. Paget’s disease produces<br />

massive expansion of the skull vault and is a localized infection that may cause periosteal<br />

reaction, but this percentage is never greater than 1%. In this study no extreme expansion<br />

of the skull vault was observed. The infection in this study is widespread and affects far<br />

more than 1% of the sample.<br />

Thus it appears overwhelmingly likely that the Carrier Mills sample suffered from<br />

some type of treponemal disease. Eighty–nine percent of this sample possessed between<br />

one to five of the primary markers for treponemal disease. Some form of periosteal<br />

involvement was observed in all but one individual from this study, and this individual<br />

(Burial 41) was not complete. Now that it has been determined that a treponemal disease<br />

did exist in the Carrier Mills Archaeological District sample, the differential diagnosis of<br />

which syndrome of treponemal disease existed at Carrier Mills will be examined and<br />

determined.<br />

4.2 Type of Treponemal Disease<br />

Distinguishing between the different syndromes of treponemal disease is a very<br />

hard task. Many of the bony alterations that occur in one syndrome also occur in the<br />

other syndromes. The saber shin deformity of the tibiae can be found in all of the<br />

68


treponematoses that affect the skeleton. Deformity of the nasal-palatal region may also<br />

be seen as well as lesions affecting any bone of the body. The lesions are<br />

morphologically indistinguishable between the different syndromes. Caries sicca is one<br />

characteristic that is not seen in all of the treponematoses. This is the destruction of the<br />

cranium produced by venereal syphilis in the tertiary stage. According to Rothschild et<br />

al. (2004:64), “periosteal reaction diffusely affecting multiple bones of more than 2% of<br />

the population is basically a manifestation of treponemal disease.” A frequency of 2-14%<br />

indicates the presence of syphilis, while frequencies of 20-40% indicate the presence of<br />

either yaws or endemic syphilis (Rothschild et al. 2004).<br />

Rothschild et al. (2000) developed a rubric and summary table of differential<br />

diagnosis, relying on the frequency of occurrence in a sample, the ages affected, and the<br />

bone groups involved, using a specific set of bone groups. This study will draw on that<br />

table to determine which treponemal disease existed in this sample.<br />

4.2.1 Bone Groups<br />

Tables 4.8- 4.12 contain data on the different bone groups affected within the<br />

sample. The tables are divided into the five different age categories; Table 4.8 is infants,<br />

Table 4.9 is adolescents, Table 4.10 consists of young adults, Table 4.11 is middle<br />

adults, and Table 4.12 contains old adults. Each table consists of the burial numbers for<br />

that age group, estimated age in years, sex of the individual, and then a listing of the bone<br />

groups showing osteitis or dental changes characteristic of treponemal disease. The<br />

different bone groups included are the nine defined and used by Rothschild et al. (2000):<br />

tibiae, fibulae, femora, humeri, radii, ulnae, hand bones, foot bones, clavicles, cranial,<br />

69


plus one additional group added for this study, teeth. The “teeth" group includes only the<br />

incisors and the molars. This group is important for distinguishing the different<br />

treponemal syndromes; thus it is included in this study. If any bone in a particular bone<br />

group is affected, then it is indicated as present with an X. Multiple X’s are used for the<br />

hands and feet because the carpals, tarsals, metacarpals, metatarsals, hand and foot<br />

phalanges are each considered separate bone groups (following Rothschild et al. 2000).<br />

If no member of the bone group is affected, it is indicated with an N. If the bone group<br />

was not observable or missing, there is an O on these tables. The number of bone groups<br />

affected (marked with an X) for each burial is then totaled.<br />

The data presented in Tables 4.8 – 4.12 indicate that there are many bone groups<br />

affected in most members of this sample instead of just a few bone groups. This sample<br />

is thus polyostotic, meaning that when looking at the bone groups, an average number<br />

greater than three are affected (Rothschild et al. 2000).<br />

Table 4.13 is a comparison of the numbers of bone groups affected within the<br />

Carrier Mills Archaic burial sample and the numbers found in individuals with confirmed<br />

cases of syphilis, yaws and endemic syphilis summarized by Rothschild et al. (2000).<br />

The numbers of adults and juveniles evaluated are totaled and the percent affected is also<br />

shown. The Carrier Mills sample has unilateral tibial involvement, but it also has<br />

bilateral tibial involvement, which was not taken into account in the Rothschild et al.<br />

(2000) study because two of their five populations were from ossuaries, hindering the<br />

assessment of a disease process involving bilaterality of the tibia. Also shown in this<br />

table are the age (years before present), of the different sites/samples, average numbers of<br />

bone groups affected, whether or not the hands/feet are affected in greater than 5% of the<br />

70


cases, and the distribution or number of individuals affected according to the different<br />

bone groups.<br />

It is clear from this comparison that the disease process which affected the<br />

individuals at Carrier Mills was not venereal syphilis. In fact, it is most like the pattern<br />

of involvement seen in yaws, but with far greater expression in terms of both numbers of<br />

individuals and average numbers of bone groups affected (see discussion in Chapter 5).<br />

4.3 Comparison of Findings<br />

Bassett (1982) found that the most common sites of localized infection for the<br />

skeletons of the Carrier Mills sample were the temporal area, the shoulder region, and the<br />

tibiae. His findings were consistent for both males and females. The fingers and the os<br />

coxae were also affected in males. Bassett (1982) also found widespread infection<br />

throughout the skeletal sample, no matter the age or sex of the individuals. This infection<br />

consisted of periosteal involvement, lesions, and saber shins of the tibiae. Out of the<br />

nearly 500 individuals from the Middle Archaic (4500 – 3000 BC) to the Woodland<br />

(1000 BC – AD 1000) periods, Bassett (1982) diagnosed 122 cases of slight osteitis,<br />

characterized by slight periosteal involvement of the anterior and posterior tibiae, the<br />

fibulae, anterior femora, and slight remodeling of the periosteum. There were 35 cases of<br />

moderate osteitis, in which he included periosteal involvement of these same bones but<br />

also the posterior femora, humeri, radii, ulnae, clavicles, metatarsals, metacarpals, and in<br />

some instances the ribs. A diagnosis of moderate osteitis also included a thick spongy<br />

growth on the tibiae and noticeable saber shins (Bassett 1982). The individuals affected<br />

71


the most were classified as having severe osteitis; there were 8 cases of these. This<br />

includes all the affected bones from the two previous classifications with the addition of<br />

deep lesions on the tibiae, other long bones, and crania. The saber shin became very<br />

obvious in these cases as well. Bassett (1982) suggested this infection was non-venereal<br />

due to symptoms occurring in young individuals as well as older individuals.<br />

The results of the present study mostly agree with the results of Bassett’s (1982)<br />

study. There is widespread infection present in all groups of this burial sample. Bassett<br />

(1982) diagnosed all infants in this study as having no osteitis. I would disagree. Of the<br />

nine infants examined here, 4 have cranial involvement, 3 have tibial involvement, 8 have<br />

involvement of the thoracic or lumbar vertebrae, and all 9 have involvement of at least<br />

one long bone. This disagreement could be due to difficulties in assessing the normal<br />

patterns of bone growth and development in infants.<br />

Another area of disagreement centers on the diagnosis of saber shins on some<br />

individuals. Bassett (1982) diagnosed Burials 1, 25, 33, 48, 65, 103, and 104 as having<br />

moderate osteitis. His diagnosis also included thick spongy growth on the tibiae and<br />

noticeable saber shins of these individuals. I did not categorize the disease process on<br />

these individuals in precisely the same way. Burial 1 has medial striations on both tibiae,<br />

and saber shin was not observed for either tibia. The left tibia did not have thick spongy<br />

growth although the right tibia did have spongy growth on the lateral surface of the shaft.<br />

Burial 25 does exhibit saber shin tibiae. The right tibia also has a concentration of woven<br />

bone at the midshaft that extends from the anterior to medial surface. Burial 33 has a<br />

slight saber shin of the right tibia. No thick spongy growth was observed on either tibia.<br />

Burial 48 exhibits saber shin on both tibiae. The tibiae both have striations on the shafts<br />

72


medially, but there is not thick spongy growth visible on the right tibia. The left tibia has<br />

a patch of thicker spongy growth medial to posterior on the distal third of the shaft that is<br />

barely noticeable. Burial 65 has saber shin on the right tibia. There are striations on the<br />

medial shaft and a thick spongy patch of bone on the proximal third of the shaft medial.<br />

The left tibia is missing. Burial 103 may have slight bowing of the tibiae, but it is so<br />

slight that this burial is considered not to have saber shin tibiae. Both tibiae do have<br />

striations medially on the shafts, but there is not any thick spongy growth on either tibia.<br />

Burial 104 exhibits saber shin on both tibiae. There are striations on the shafts of both<br />

tibia medially, there is spongy bone on both anterior shafts, and both have lesions on the<br />

proximal shafts lateral, the left has two lesions, while the right has one lesion. Bassett<br />

(1982) diagnosed eight individuals with saber shin tibiae and the present study diagnosed<br />

six individuals with saber shin tibiae, including Burial 38.<br />

Most of the findings in Bassett’s (1982) original study of the Carrier Mills<br />

skeletal sample that pertain to the individuals in this sample were confirmed. There are<br />

differences pertaining to the infants and to the individuals diagnosed as having saber shin<br />

tibiae. These differences can be attributed to observer error (given the large amount of<br />

analysis undertaken at once by Bassett) and to the many new advances in paleopathology<br />

since 1982.<br />

4.4 Summary<br />

Treponemal disease was determined to be present in this sub-sample based on the<br />

presence of osteitis/periostitis changes in different bones/groups by age, sex, and uni- or<br />

73


ilaterality of the extremities. Five primary marker sets (cranial, hand, tibial, fibular, and<br />

foot) were used to determine the likelihood of a treponemal disease within this sub-<br />

sample. Thirty-nine percent of the sub-sample were categorized as highly likely - to -<br />

certain for having treponemal disease, 52% were possible for exhibiting treponemal<br />

disease, and 9% had indications of a general infection, but were classified as not having<br />

had a clear indication of treponemal infection.<br />

Rothschild et al. (2004) concluded that 2% or more of a population with periosteal<br />

reaction is indicative of a treponemal disease. They also state that a frequency of 20-40%<br />

indicates either yaws or endemic syphilis in a population. The results of this study show<br />

that 91% of the sub-sample display some kind of periosteal reaction, which is a<br />

considerably greater amount than the 2% necessary to indicate treponemal disease. The<br />

present study also found that 39% of the individuals were categorized as highly likely - to<br />

-certain for treponemal disease. This would fall into the range of the 20-40% (at least)<br />

that is indicative of a nonvenereal treponemal infection, like yaws.<br />

From the comparison in Table 4.13, the profile of age and bone group<br />

involvement make it clear that the Carrier Mills Archaeological District suffered from a<br />

syndrome of treponemal disease most like yaws. When Carrier Mills is compared to the<br />

confirmed cases of yaws summarized by Rothschild et al. (2004), the number of<br />

individuals affected are higher in frequency, with much greater than 5% (in fact 99%) of<br />

the Carrier Mills sample affected as a whole (only one individual without evidence of<br />

bone disease), and the hands and feet are also affected with a much higher prevalence rate<br />

than 5%. Sixty percent of the individuals in this study had involvement of the hands,<br />

while 73% had involvement of the feet (see Table 4.6). This is a significant amount, too<br />

74


high of a percentage to be considered venereal syphilis or endemic syphilis. What do<br />

these figures tell us about the Carrier Mills sample? In the Discussion and Conclusions<br />

Chapter, I will examine more closely: 1) the differential diagnosis of treponemal disease,<br />

2) what life might have been like for the Archaic peoples of Carrier Mills, Illinois, and 3)<br />

what this study means in terms of the history and origin of treponemal disease.<br />

75


Table 4.1. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS<br />

Infants (n=9, age = birth to 3 years)<br />

Burial Number B21 B30 B32 B40 B46 B62 B63 B77 B87 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 1.7 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 1.3 0.8 -<br />

Sex of individual Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv -<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement A P P P A P A A A 4<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement<br />

A A A A A A A A A 0<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors<br />

A A A A A A A A A 0<br />

Moon's Molars A A A A A A A A A 0<br />

Mulberry Molars A A A A A A A A A 0<br />

Clavicle Involvement A P P P P P P P P 8<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement P P P P P P P P P 9<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement<br />

A A A A A A A A A 0<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement - A P P P A A P A 4<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement<br />

- P A A A P P A P 4<br />

Bowed Radius - A A A A A A A A 0<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement - A P A P P A P P 5<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement<br />

- P A P A A P A A 3<br />

Bowed Ulna - A A A A A A A A 0<br />

2 Hand Involvement<br />

A A A A A A A P A 1<br />

Rib Involvement A P P P P P P P P 8<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement A A A A A A A A A 0<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement A A P P P P P P A 6<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement P A P P P P A P P 7<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (V)<br />

A A A A A A A A A 0<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement A A P P A P A P P 5<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement A P A A P A A A A 2<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement - - P - - - - - P 2<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement - A A - - P - - A 1<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia - A A - - A - - A 0<br />

76


Table 4.1. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS,<br />

continued.<br />

Infants (n=9, age = birth to 3 years)<br />

Burial Number B21 B30 B32 B40 B46 B62 B63 B77 B87 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 1.7 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 1.3 0.8 -<br />

Sex of individual Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv -<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement - - P - - - - - P 2<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement<br />

- - A - - - - - A 0<br />

5 Foot Involvement A A P - A - - - A 1<br />

Number of Pathological Features 2 7 12 9 8 10 6 9 9 72<br />

Number of Bone Groups Affected<br />

1 5 8 5 5 6 4 6 7 -<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

P = present A = absent - = not observable<br />

77


Table 4.2. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS<br />

Adolescents (n=2, age = 12 to 20 years)<br />

Burial Number B89 B116 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 16.5 16.3<br />

-<br />

Sex of individual F M -<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement A A 0<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement<br />

A A 0<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors<br />

A A 0<br />

Moon's Molars A A 0<br />

Mulberry Molars A A 0<br />

Clavicle Involvement P P 2<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement - P 1<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement<br />

P A 1<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement A A 0<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement<br />

P P 2<br />

Bowed Radius A A 0<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement A P 1<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement<br />

P A 1<br />

Bowed Ulna A A 0<br />

2 Hand Involvement<br />

P A 1<br />

Rib Involvement P P 2<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement P A 1<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement<br />

P P 2<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement P P 2<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (V)<br />

A A 0<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement P - 1<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement P - 1<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement P - 1<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement P - 1<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia A - 0<br />

78


Table 4.2. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS,<br />

continued.<br />

Adolescents (n=2, age = 12 to 20 years)<br />

Burial Number B89 B116 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 16.5 16.3<br />

-<br />

Sex of individual F M -<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement A - 0<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement<br />

P P 2<br />

5 Foot Involvement P P 2<br />

Number of Pathological Features 15 9 24<br />

Number of Bone Groups Affected<br />

12 6 -<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

P = present A = absent - = not observable<br />

79


Table 4.3. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS<br />

Young Adults (n=19, age = 20 to 35 years)<br />

Burial Number B3 B25 B35 B39 B41 B48 B50 B66 B69 B82<br />

Estimated Age (years) 27 33 21 22 20-35 20-35 34 21 29 25<br />

Sex of individual M M M M F M? M F M ?<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement A P P A - - - P A A<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement<br />

A P A - - - - A A A<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors<br />

A A A - - - - A A A<br />

Moon's Molars A A A - - - - A A A<br />

Mulberry Molars A A A - - - - A A A<br />

Clavicle Involvement A P P - A - - P P P<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement A A A - - - - P A P<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement<br />

A A A A A - P A A P<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement A A A - - - A P A A<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement<br />

A P A A A - A A P P<br />

Bowed Radius A A A A A - A A A A<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement A P A A - - A A A A<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement<br />

A A P A A - A P A P<br />

Bowed Ulna A A A A A - A P A P<br />

2 Hand Involvement<br />

A P P P - - A A P P<br />

Rib Involvement A A A A - - A P A P<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement A A P - - - - A A A<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement<br />

P P P P A A - P P P<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement P P P P - - P P P P<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (V)<br />

P A A A A - A P P A<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement P P P P - - P P - P<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement A A A A A - A P A P<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement - P P - - P P - - P<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement - P P - A A A P - A<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia - P A - A P A A - A<br />

80


Table 4.3. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS,<br />

continued.<br />

Young Adults (n=19, age = 20 to 35 years)<br />

Burial Number B3 B25 B35 B39 B41 B48 B50 B66 B69 B82<br />

Estimated Age (years) 27 33 21 22 20-35 20-35 34 21 29 25<br />

Sex of individual M M M M F M? M F M ?<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement - P A - - P P - - P<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement<br />

- A A - A A A P - P<br />

5 Foot Involvement - A P - A P P - P P<br />

Num. of Pathological Features 4 13 11 4 0 4 6 14 7 16<br />

Num. of Bone Groups Affected<br />

1 8 7 3 - 4 7 7 4 10<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

P = present A = absent - = not observable<br />

81


Table 4.3. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS, cont.<br />

Young Adults (n=19, age = 20 to 35 years)<br />

Burial Number B83 B84 B95 B100 B105 B109 B111 B113 B114 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 20 29 34 20+ 27 21 22 26 20 -<br />

Sex of individual F F M M? M F F M M -<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement A P - - - A A A A 4<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement<br />

- A - - - A A A A 1<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors<br />

A A - - - A A A - 0<br />

Moon's Molars A A - - - A A A A 0<br />

Mulberry Molars A A - - - A A A A 0<br />

Clavicle Involvement A P - - - A A A A 6<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement P P - - - A A - P 5<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement<br />

A A - - - P A A A 3<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement A A - - - P A - A 2<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement<br />

A A - - A A A A A 3<br />

Bowed Radius A A - - A A A A A 0<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement A A - - - P A - A 2<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement<br />

A A - - A A A A A 3<br />

Bowed Ulna A A - - A A A A A 2<br />

2 Hand Involvement<br />

A P - - P P A A A 8<br />

Rib Involvement A P - - - P A A A 4<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement P P - - - - A - A 3<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement<br />

P P - - - P P - P 12<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement P P A - - P P - P 13<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (V)<br />

A A A - - A P - A 4<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement P P - A - P P P P 13<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement P P P P P A A A A 7<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement P P P P A - P P P 12<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement A A P A A - A A A 4<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia A A A A A - A A A 2<br />

82


Table 4.3. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS, cont.<br />

Young Adults (n=19, age = 20 to 35 years)<br />

Burial Number B83 B84 B95 B100 B105 B109 B111 B113 B114 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 20 29 34 20+ 27 21 22 26 20 -<br />

Sex of individual F F M M? M F F M M -<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement A P - P P - P P P 10<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement<br />

A A P A A - A P A 4<br />

5 Foot Involvement A A P P P - P P P 11<br />

Num. of Pathological Features 7 12 5 4 4 8 7 5 7 138<br />

Num. of Bone Groups Affected<br />

3 7 5 5 6 6 3 4 6 -<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

P = present A = absent - = not observable<br />

83


Table 4.4. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS<br />

Middle Adults (n=20, age = 35 to 50 years)<br />

Burial Number B7 B17 B29 B33 B38 B45 B49 B65 B72 B85<br />

Estimated Age (years) 47 50 44 35 40 37 46 49 38 40<br />

Sex of individual F F M M M F M M M F<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement P - P A P A - P A -<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement<br />

A - - P P A - P - -<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors<br />

- - - A A A - A - -<br />

Moon's Molars - - - A A - - A - -<br />

Mulberry Molars - - - A A - - A - -<br />

Clavicle Involvement A P - P P P - P - A<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement A P - A P P - A A -<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement<br />

P A - A P A P P A P<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement A A - A P A P A A -<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement<br />

P A - A P A A A P -<br />

Bowed Radius A A - A A A A P A -<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement A A - A A A A A A A<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement<br />

P A - A P A A A A A<br />

Bowed Ulna A A - P P A A P P A<br />

2 Hand Involvement<br />

P A A P P P P P P A<br />

Rib Involvement A A - A P P A A A P<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement P - - P P P P A A P<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement P A - P P P P P P P<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement P P - P P P P P P P<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (V)<br />

P P - P P P P P A P<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement A A A P P P P A P P<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement A A A A A A P P A A<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement P - P P P P P - - -<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement P P A A A A A P - -<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia A A A P P A A P - -<br />

84


Table 4.4. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS,<br />

continued.<br />

Middle Adults (n=20, age = 35 to 50 years)<br />

Burial Number B7 B17 B29 B33 B38 B45 B49 B65 B72 B85<br />

Estimated Age (years) 47 50 44 35 40 37 46 49 38 40<br />

Sex of individual F F M M M F M M M F<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement A P A P P P P - - -<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement<br />

A A A P P A A P - P<br />

5 Foot Involvement P P P P P A A P - P<br />

Number of Pathological Features 12 7 3 14 21 11 11 15 6 9<br />

Number of Bone Groups Affected<br />

7 4 3 7 13 8 6 7 5 5<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

P = present A = absent - = not observable<br />

85


Table 4.4. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS, cont.<br />

Middle Adults (n=20, age = 35 to 50 years)<br />

Burial Number B86 B91 B93 B94 B99 B104 B106 B110 B121 B124 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 35 42 42 44 35 46 47 36 39 42 -<br />

Sex of individual F M M ? F M F M M M -<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement P A P A A P P A A - 8<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement<br />

A P A A A A A A P - 5<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors<br />

A A A A A - A A A A 0<br />

Moon's Molars A A A A A - A A A A 0<br />

Mulberry Molars A A A A A - A A A A 0<br />

Clavicle Involvement A A P P A P A P P A 10<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement A P A P A A P P P - 8<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement<br />

A A P - A A A A A P 7<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement P P A A A A A P P - 6<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement<br />

A A P P P A A A A P 7<br />

Bowed Radius P A A A A A A A A A 1<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement A P A - A A A A A A 1<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement<br />

A A A P P P A A A P 6<br />

Bowed Ulna A A A A A P A A P A 5<br />

2 Hand Involvement<br />

P P P P P P A P P P 16<br />

Rib Involvement A P A P P P A A P P 9<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement A A A P A A A A P P 9<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement P P P P P P A P P P 17<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement P P P P P A P P P - 17<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (V)<br />

A A P A A A P P P P 13<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement A P A - P A P P P P 12<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement P A A - A P A A P A 5<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement A P P - P P P P - - 12<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement P A P - P A A A - P 8<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia A A A - A P A A - A 4<br />

86


87<br />

Table 4.4. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS, cont.<br />

Middle Adults (n=20, age = 35 to 50 years)<br />

Burial Number B86 B91 B93 B94 B99 B104 B106 B110 B121 B124 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 35 42 42 44 35 46 47 36 39 42 -<br />

Sex of individual F M M ? F M F M M M -<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement P P P - P P P A - - 11<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement<br />

A A A - A P A P - A 7<br />

5 Foot Involvement P A P P P P A P - P 14<br />

Number of Pathological Features 10 11 12 10 11 13 7 11 13 11 218<br />

Number of Bone Groups Affected<br />

8 8 10 9 9 9 4 9 7 8 -<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

P = present A = absent - = not observable


Table 4.5. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS<br />

Old Adults (n=4, age = >50+ years)<br />

Burial Number B1 B4 B51 B103 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 56 58 51 53<br />

-<br />

Sex of individual F F M F<br />

-<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement P P - - 2<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement<br />

A A - - 0<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors<br />

A A - - 0<br />

Moon's Molars<br />

A A - - 0<br />

Mulberry Molars<br />

A A - -<br />

0<br />

Clavicle Involvement A A A P 1<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement A P - P 2<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement P A P A 2<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement A A A P 1<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement A A A A 0<br />

Bowed Radius A A A A 0<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement A P P A 2<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement A A A A 0<br />

Bowed Ulna A A A P 1<br />

2 Hand involvement P P P P 4<br />

Rib Involvement A A A P 1<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement A A - A 0<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement P A P P 3<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement P A P A 2<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (V) P P A A 2<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement P P - P 3<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement P A P A 2<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement P P P P 4<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement A P A A 1<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia A A A A 0<br />

88


Table 4.5. PATHOLOGICAL MARKERS ASSOCIATED WITH <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE INDIVIDUALS,<br />

continued.<br />

Old Adults (n=4, age = >50+ years)<br />

Burial Number B1 B4 B51 B103 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 56 58 51 53 -<br />

Sex of individual F F M F -<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement P P A P 3<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement A A P A 1<br />

5 Foot Involvement P P P P 4<br />

Number of Pathological Features 11 10 9 11 37<br />

Number of Bone Groups Affected 7 9 8 8 -<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

P = present A = absent - = not observable<br />

89


Table 4.6. SUMMARY & PERCENTAGES OF POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL MARKERS FOUND IN CARRIER MILLS<br />

# of # of % of # of # of # of % of % of<br />

Infants Adol Juv Y Adults M Adults O Adults Adults Total<br />

Markers (n=9) (n=2) (n=11) (n=19) (n=20) (n=4) (n=43) (t=54)<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement 4/9 0/2 36% 4/13 8/16 2/2 45% 43%<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement 0/9 0/2 0 1/11 5/14 0/2 22% 16%<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors 0/9 0/2 0 0/11 0/13 0/2 0 0<br />

Moon's Molars 0/9 0/2 0 0/12 0/12 0/2 0 0<br />

Mulberry Molars 0/9 0/2 0 0/12 0/12 0/2 0 0<br />

Clavicle Involvement 8/9 2/2 91% 6/13 10/17 1/4 50% 60%<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement 9/9 1/1 100% 5/11 8/16 2/3 50% 63%<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement 0/9 1/2 9% 3/15 7/18 2/4 32% 27%<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement 4/8 0/2 40% 2/12 6/17 1/4 27% 30%<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement 4/8 2/2 60% 3/15 7/18 0/4 27% 34%<br />

Bowed Radius 0/8 0/2 0 0/16 2/18 0/4 5% 4%<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement 5/8 1/2 60% 2/13 1/18 2/4 14% 24%<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement 3/8 1/2 40% 3/16 6/19 0/4 23% 27%<br />

Bowed Ulna 0/8 0/2 0 2/16 6/19 1/4 23% 18%<br />

2 Hand Involvement 1/9 1/2 18% 8/15 16/20 4/4 72% 60%<br />

Rib Involvement 8/9 2/2 91% 4/14 9/19 1/4 38% 50%<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement 0/9 1/2 9% 3/10 9/18 0/3 39% 31%<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement 6/9 2/2 73% 12/14 17/19 3/4 86% 83%<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement 7/9 2/2 82% 13/14 17/18 2/4 89% 87%<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (Vert.) 0/9 0/2 0 4/15 13/19 2/4 50% 39%<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement 5/9 1/1 60% 13/14 12/19 3/3 78% 74%<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement 2/9 1/1 30% 7/18 5/19 2/4 34% 33%<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement 2/2 1/1 100% 12/13 12/13 4/4 93% 94%<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement 1/4 1/1 40% 4/15 7/16 1/4 34% 35%<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia 0/4 0/1 0 2/15 4/16 0/4 17% 15%<br />

90


Table 4.6. SUMMARY & PERCENTAGES OF POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL MARKERS FOUND IN CARRIER MILLS, cont.<br />

# of # of % of # of # of # of % of % of<br />

Infants Adol Juv Y Adults M Adults O Adults Adults Total<br />

Markers (n=9) (n=2) (n=11) (n=19) (n=20) (n=4) (n=43) (t=54)<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement 2/2 0/1 67% 10/12 11/14 3/4 80% 79%<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement 0/2 2/2 50% 4/15 6/17 1/4 31% 33%<br />

5 Foot Involvement 1/5 2/2 43% 11/15 14/18 4/4 78% 73%<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

n = number of individuals in age category<br />

t = total number of individuals in the sample<br />

% of juveniles = infants + adolescents/observable # X100<br />

% of adults = young + middle + old adults/observable # X100<br />

% of total = juveniles + adults/observable # X100<br />

% of males = number of males affected/observable # X100<br />

% of females = number of females affected/observable # X100<br />

91


Table 4.6. SUMMARY & PERCENTAGES OF POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL MARKERS FOUND IN CARRIER MILLS, cont.<br />

# of % of # of % of<br />

Males M Females F<br />

Markers (n=26) (t=26) (n=17) (t=17)<br />

1 Frontal/Parietal Involvement 7/19 37% 7/13 54%<br />

1 Nasal/Palatal Involvement 6/16 38% 0/12 0<br />

Hutchinson's Incisors 0/15 0 0/12 0<br />

Moon's Molars 0/16 0 0/11 0<br />

Mulberry Molars 0/16 0 0/11 0<br />

Clavicle Involvement 12/18 67% 6/17 35%<br />

Bilateral Humerus Involvement 7/16 44% 8/14 57%<br />

Unilateral Humerus Involvement 8/22 36% 5/17 29%<br />

Bilateral Radius Involvement 5/19 26% 4/15 27%<br />

Unilateral Radius Involvement 8/23 35% 3/16 19%<br />

Bowed Radius 1/23 4% 1/16 6%<br />

Bilateral Ulna Involvement 4/21 19% 2/16 13%<br />

Unilateral Ulna Involvement 5/23 22% 4/17 24%<br />

Bowed Ulna 7/23 30% 2/17 12%<br />

2 Hand Involvement 18/24 75% 10/16 63%<br />

Rib Involvement 7/22 32% 8/16 50%<br />

Cervical Vertebrae Involvement 6/18 33% 6/14 43%<br />

Thoracic Vertebrae Involvement 20/21 95% 13/17 76%<br />

Lumbar Vertebrae Involvement 19/21 90% 14/16 88%<br />

Periarticular Resorptive Foci (Vert.) 10/22 45% 9/17 53%<br />

Bilateral Femur Involvement 16/21 76% 13/16 81%<br />

Unilateral Femur Involvement 9/25 36% 6/17 35%<br />

3 Bilateral Tibia Involvement 18/19 95% 11/12 92%<br />

3 Unilateral Tibia Involvement 6/21 29% 7/15 47%<br />

3 Saber Shin Tibia 6/21 29% 0/15 0<br />

92


Table 4.6. SUMMARY & PERCENTAGES OF POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL MARKERS FOUND IN CARRIER MILLS, cont.<br />

# of % of # of % of<br />

Males M Females F<br />

Markers (n=26) (t=26) (n=17) (t=17)<br />

4 Bilateral Fibula Involvement 14/18 78% 10/13 77%<br />

4 Unilateral Fibula Involvement 10/22 45% 3/16 19%<br />

5 Foot Involvement 20/23 87% 10/15 67%<br />

The five primary markers are numbered and indicated in bold.<br />

n = number of individuals in age category<br />

t = total number of individuals in the sample<br />

% of juveniles = infants + adolescents/observable # X100<br />

% of adults = young + middle + old adults/observable # X100<br />

% of total = juveniles + adults/observable # X100<br />

% of males = number of males affected/observable # X100<br />

% of females = number of females affected/observable # X100<br />

93


Table 4.7. PERCENTAGES OF POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL DISEASE<br />

Likeli- None Possible Highly Certain<br />

hood - - Likely -<br />

# Markers 0 Markers 1-3 Markers 4-5 markers 5 + markers<br />

Burials 5/54 28/54 15/54 6/54<br />

Percent 9% 52% 28% 11%<br />

Note: Based on cranial, hands, tibiae, fibulae, and feet, and involvement.<br />

Please see text for descriptions.<br />

94


Table 4.8. BONE GROUPS AFFECTED IN <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

Infants (n=9, age = birth to 3 years)<br />

Burial Numbers B21 B30 B32 B40 B46 B62 B63 B77 B87 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 1.7 0.2 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.4 1.3 0.8 -<br />

Sex of Individual Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv Juv -<br />

Bone Group - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Tibia O N X O O X O O X 3<br />

Fibula O O X O O O O O X 2<br />

Femora N X X X X X N X X 7<br />

Humerus X X X X X X X X X 9<br />

Radius O X X X X X X X X 8<br />

Ulna O X X X X X X X X 8<br />

Hand Bones N N N N N N N X N 1<br />

Foot Bones N N X O N O O O N 1<br />

Clavicle N X X X X X X X X 8<br />

Cranial N X X X N X N N N 4<br />

Teeth N N N N N N N N N 0<br />

<strong>TO</strong>TALS 1 6 9 6 5 7 4 6 7 51<br />

X = affected bone group, N = non-affected bone group, O = not observable<br />

95


Table 4.9. BONE GROUPS AFFECTED IN <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

Adolescents (n = 2, age = 12 to 20 years)<br />

Burial Numbers B89 B116 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 16.5 16.3 -<br />

Sex of Individual F M -<br />

Bone Group - - -<br />

Tibia X O 1<br />

Fibula X X 2<br />

Femora X O 1<br />

Humerus X X 2<br />

Radius X X 2<br />

Ulna X X 2<br />

Hand Bones XX N 2<br />

Foot Bones XXX X 4<br />

Clavicle X X 2<br />

Cranial N N 0<br />

Teeth (incisors, molars) N N 0<br />

<strong>TO</strong>TALS 12 6 18<br />

X = affected bone group,N = non-affected bone group, O = not observable<br />

96


Table 4.10. BONE GROUPS AFFECTED IN <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

Young Adults (n = 19, age = 20 to 35 years)<br />

Burial Numbers B3 B25 B35 B39 B41 B48 B50 B66 B69 B82<br />

Estimated Age (years) 27 33 21 22 20-35 20-35 34 21 29 25<br />

Sex of Individual M M M M F M? M F M ?<br />

Bone Group - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Tibia O X X O N X X X O X<br />

Fibula O X N O N X X X O X<br />

Femora X X X X N O X X N X<br />

Humerus N N N N N O X X N X<br />

Radius N X N N N O N X X X<br />

Ulna N X X N N O N X N X<br />

Hand Bones N XX X XX O O N N X X<br />

Foot Bones O N XX O N XX XXX O X XX<br />

Clavicle N X X O N O O X X X<br />

Cranial N X X N O O O X N N<br />

Teeth (incisors, molars) N N N O O O O N N N<br />

<strong>TO</strong>TALS 1 9 8 3 0 4 7 8 4 10<br />

X = affected bone group, N = non-affected bone group, O = not observable<br />

97


Table 4.10. BONE GROUPS AFFECTED IN <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE,<br />

continued.<br />

Young Adults (n = 19, age = 20 to 35 years)<br />

Burial Numbers B83 B84 B95 B100 B105 B109 B111 B113 B114 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 20 29 34 20+ 27 21 22 26 20 -<br />

Sex of Individual F F M M? M F F M M -<br />

Bone Group - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Tibia X X X X N O X X X 13<br />

Fibula N X X X X O X X X 12<br />

Femora X X X X X X X X X 16<br />

Humerus X X O O O X N N X 7<br />

Radius N N O O N X N N N 5<br />

Ulna N N O O N X N N N 5<br />

Hand Bones N XX O O XX XX N N N 13<br />

Foot Bones N N XX XX XX O X X XX 20<br />

Clavicle N X O O O N N N N 6<br />

Cranial N X O O O N N N N 4<br />

Teeth (incisors, molars) N N O O O N N N N 0<br />

<strong>TO</strong>TALS 3 8 5 5 6 6 4 4 6 54<br />

X = affected bone group, N = non-affected bone group, O = not observable<br />

98


Table 4.11. BONE GROUPS AFFECTED IN <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

Middle Adults (n = 20, age = 35 to 50 years)<br />

Burial Numbers B7 B17 B29 B33 B38 B45 B49 B65 B72 B85<br />

Estimated Age (years) 47 50 44 35 40 37 46 49 38 40<br />

Sex of Individual F F M M M F M M M F<br />

Bone Group - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Tibia X X X X X X X X O O<br />

Fibula N X N X X X X X O X<br />

Femora N N N X X X X X X X<br />

Humerus X X O N X X X X N X<br />

Radius X N O N X N X X X O<br />

Ulna X N O X X N N X X N<br />

Hand Bones X N N X XXX XXX XX X X N<br />

Foot Bones XX X XX XX XXX N N X O XX<br />

Clavicle N X O X X X O X O N<br />

Cranial X O X X X N O X N O<br />

Teeth (incisors, molars) O O O N N O O N O O<br />

<strong>TO</strong>TALS 8 5 4 9 14 8 7 10 4 5<br />

X = affected bone group, N = non-affected bone group, O = not observable<br />

99


Table 4.11. BONE GROUPS AFFECTED IN <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE, continued.<br />

Middle Adults (n = 20, age = 35 to 50 years)<br />

Burial Numbers B86 B91 B93 B94 B99 B104 B106 B110 B121 B124 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 35 42 42 44 35 46 47 36 39 42 -<br />

Sex of Individual F M M ? F M F M M M -<br />

Bone Group - - - - - - - - - - -<br />

Tibia X X X O X X X X O X 17<br />

Fibula X X X O X X X X O N 15<br />

Femora X X N O X X X X X X 15<br />

Humerus N X X X N N X X X X 14<br />

Radius X X X X X N N X X X 13<br />

Ulna N X N X X X N N X X 10<br />

Hand Bones X XX XXX XXX XX XXX N X XXX X 31<br />

Foot Bones XXX N XX XX XX X N XXX O XX 28<br />

Clavicle N N X X N X N X X N 10<br />

Cranial X X X N N X X N X O 11<br />

Teeth (incisors, molars) N N N N N O N N N N 0<br />

<strong>TO</strong>TALS 9 9 11 9 9 10 5 10 9 8 74<br />

X = affected bone group, N = non-affected bone group, O = not observable<br />

100


Table 4.12. BONE GROUPS AFFECTED IN <strong>THE</strong> CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

Old Adults (n = 4, age = >50+ years)<br />

Burial Numbers B1 B4 B51 B103 <strong>TO</strong>TALS<br />

Estimated Age (years) 56 58 51 53 -<br />

Sex of Individual F F M F -<br />

Bone Group - - - - -<br />

Tibia X X X X 4<br />

Fibula X X X X 4<br />

Femora X X X X 4<br />

Humerus X X X X 4<br />

Radius N N N X 1<br />

Ulna N X X X 3<br />

Hand Bones X XX XX X 6<br />

Foot Bones XX XX X XX 7<br />

Clavicle N N N X 1<br />

Cranial X X O O 2<br />

Teeth (incisors, molars) N N O O 0<br />

<strong>TO</strong>TALS 8 10 8 10 36<br />

X = affected bone group, N = non-affected bone group, O = not observable<br />

101


Table 4.13. NUMBERS OF BONE GROUPS AFFECTED IN CARRIER MILLS SAMPLE<br />

COMPARED <strong>TO</strong> CONFIRMED DISEASE<br />

Carrier<br />

Confirmed Disease*<br />

Parameter<br />

Mills Syphilis Yaws Bejel<br />

Date, years before present<br />

Adults<br />

> 3000 60-90 500 50-200<br />

No. evaluated 43 2906 214 40<br />

No. (%) affected<br />

Juveniles<br />

42(98%) 145(5%) 71(33%) 10(25%)<br />

No. evaluated 11 50 60 10<br />

No. (%) affected 11(100%) 0(0%) 8(14%) 1(10%)<br />

>5% affected Yes No Yes Yes<br />

Bilateral tibial involvement Yes - - -<br />

Unilateral tibial involvement Yes Yes No No<br />

Saber shin without surface reaction No Yes No No<br />

Average no. of bone groups affected 6.3 1.9 4.0 2.0<br />

Average no. of bone groups > 3 Yes No Yes No<br />

Hands/Feet >5%<br />

Distribution, no. affected<br />

Yes No Yes No<br />

Tibia 67 96 35 14<br />

Fibula 58 41 20 3<br />

Femora 77 41 31 3<br />

Humerus 59 16 10 0<br />

Radius 42 8 13 1<br />

Ulna 36 6 15 0<br />

Hand Bones 122 2 9 0<br />

Foot Bones 128 0 12 0<br />

Clavicle 43 4 3 0<br />

Cranial 22 38 7 1<br />

Teeth (incisors, molars) 0 - - -<br />

* Adapted from Rothschild et al. 2000, and Rothschild and Rothschild 1994,<br />

based on 3280 skeletons of known treponemal pathology.<br />

102


Percentages<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Figure 4.1. Percentages of Treponemal Markers in Juveniles and Adults<br />

Juveniles<br />

Adults<br />

Fron/Par Nas/Pal Hand Bi Tib Uni Tib Saber Tib Bi Fib Uni Fib Foot<br />

103


Percentages<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Figure 4.2. Percentages of Treponemal Markers in Males, Females, and Total Sample<br />

Fron/Par Nas/Pal Hand Bi Tib Uni Tib Saber Tib Bi Fib Uni Fib Foot<br />

Males<br />

Females<br />

Totals<br />

104


Likelihood %<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

Figure 4.3. Likelihood of Treponemal Disease in Individuals at Carrier Mills<br />

None<br />

Possible<br />

Highly Likely<br />

Certain<br />

105


106


Figure 4.4. Cranium of Burial 38 showing location and size of lesions.<br />

106


Figure 4.5. Burial 38 Left 3 rd metacarpal with unifocal bone loss and woven bone.<br />

Figure 4.6. Burial 38 Right tibia posterior midshaft 6 lesions with woven and sclerotic<br />

reaction.<br />

107


Figure 4.7. Burial 38 Left fibula lateral close up of cloaca.<br />

Figure 4.8. Burial 38 Left 1 st metatarsal plantar with woven and sclerotic reaction.<br />

108


CHAPTER 5<br />

DISCUSSION <strong>AND</strong> CONCLUSIONS<br />

5.1 Differential Diagnosis of Treponemal Disease<br />

The distribution of pathological alterations in the skeletons from Carrier Mills is<br />

almost certainly indicative of an endemic treponemal infection and not of leprosy,<br />

tuberculosis, or some other disease. Differentiating between the three syndromes of<br />

treponemal disease affecting the human skeletal system can be very challenging. The<br />

syndromes yaws, endemic syphilis, and venereal syphilis leave similar periosteal changes<br />

on the same bones, for the most part. Rothschild et al. (2000) suggest that an<br />

epidemiological approach can discriminate between the different syndromes of<br />

treponematoses. This chapter provides an epidemiological approach to discriminating<br />

between the different treponematoses as applied to the human skeletal remains from the<br />

Carrier Mills Archaeological District.<br />

Venereal syphilis was not the syndrome of treponemal disease affecting the<br />

Carrier Mills sample. This was concluded from comparing the confirmed cases of<br />

venereal syphilis in samples from the Rothschild et al. (2000) study to the present study<br />

(see Table 4.13). In the confirmed cases of venereal syphilis, prevalence in the<br />

population is small: very few adults have affected bone groups (5%), while none of the<br />

juveniles are affected. In the Carrier Mills sample, 98% of the adults have affected bone<br />

109


groups, and 100% of the juveniles are affected. (Note that this comparison is based on<br />

the nine bone groups of Rothschild et al. plus teeth, not the five "primary markers" used<br />

earlier to indicate any evidence of a treponemal infection). The hands and feet are only<br />

affected in fewer than 5% of the sample of the confirmed cases of venereal syphilis. For<br />

the Carrier Mills sample, more than 5% of the hands and feet are involved. The average<br />

number of bone groups affected in the confirmed cases of venereal syphilis is few, at 1.9<br />

(Rothschild et al. 2000). The average number of bone groups for the Carrier Mills study<br />

is much higher at 6.3. On the basis of both adults and juveniles affected, more than 5%<br />

of the hands and feet being affected, and the average number of bone groups being<br />

greater than 3, the Carrier Mills Archaic sample could not have suffered from venereal<br />

syphilis.<br />

By comparing the Carrier Mills sample to that of the confirmed cases of endemic<br />

syphilis (bejel), it is concluded that endemic syphilis was not the treponemal disease<br />

affecting this sample either. In the confirmed cases of endemic syphilis, 25% of the<br />

adults are affected and 10% of the juveniles are affected (see Table 4.13). In the Carrier<br />

Mills sample, 98% of the adults are affected, while 100% of the juveniles are affected.<br />

While it is true that greater than 5% of the juveniles are affected in the confirmed cases of<br />

endemic syphilis, it is still a very small percentage compared to ubiquity seen in the<br />

Carrier Mills juveniles. The hands and feet are affected in fewer than 5% of individuals<br />

of the confirmed cases of endemic syphilis (see Table 4.13). In the Carrier Mills study,<br />

the hands and feet are affected greater than 5%. The average number of bone groups<br />

affected in the Carrier Mills sample is 6.3, while the average number of bone groups in<br />

the confirmed cases of endemic syphilis is much smaller, at 2.0. Based on these figures,<br />

110


endemic syphilis is not the treponemal disease affecting the Carrier Mills Archaic<br />

sample.<br />

The comparison of the confirmed cases of yaws to that of the Carrier Mills study<br />

strongly supports that the Carrier Mills Archaic sample suffered from a treponemal<br />

disease most like that of yaws, among known modern treponemal syndromes. In yaws,<br />

greater than 5% of the individuals have involvement of the hands and feet, there is a<br />

greater frequency of adults and juveniles affected, and the average number of bone<br />

groups affected is greater than three (see Table 4.13). This is the pattern seen in the<br />

Carrier Mills sample. It is overwhelmingly apparent that a treponemal disease<br />

resembling that of yaws affected the Carrier Mills Archaic sample. So what does this tell<br />

us about the life of the Carrier Mills Archaic people as compared to other<br />

contemporaneous North American sites located nearby and what does it mean in the<br />

context of the debate on the origin of treponemal disease?<br />

5.2 Comparisons to Other Sites<br />

The findings of this research can now be compared to other nearby or Archaic<br />

sites. The first two sites are those of Moundville and Irene Mound. Powell (1991) found<br />

similar pathological evidence of nonvenereal treponemal disease at both of these sites.<br />

Moundville is a Mississippian (AD 1050-1550) period occupation site located in west<br />

central Alabama. The total number of excavated burials from this site is 1500; of these<br />

Powell (1991) selected 564 for her study. Irene Mound is also a Mississippian (AD<br />

1110-1400) site located near the mouth of the Savannah River on the Atlantic Coast.<br />

111


Two hundred and sixty-five individuals were selected from this site for analysis. Both of<br />

these samples revealed extensive periostitis on the long bone shafts of the tibia, fibula,<br />

radius, and ulna, along with saber shin deformity (Ibid.). In the Moundville sample,<br />

small, circular depressions were found on the cranial vaults. Skeletons from Irene<br />

Mound, on the other hand, exhibited evidence of gangosa. A young adult female from<br />

Irene Mound exhibited lesions of the frontal, palate, maxilla and extensive remodeling of<br />

the nasal aperture (Ibid.).<br />

When Carrier Mills is compared to Moundville and Irene Mound, there are clear<br />

similarities. Numerous foci of periostitis along the long bone shafts of the tibiae and<br />

fibulae, as well as saber shin deformity are found in the skeletons from all three sites.<br />

The Irene Mound skeletons display evidence of gangosa, while those from Carrier Mills<br />

do not, although at both Irene Mound (IM) and Carrier Mills (CM) there are lesions on<br />

the frontal bones of two individuals (a young adult female (IM) and a middle adult male<br />

(CM)). The differences in the disease profile between these sites could be attributed to<br />

the time span between the sites; Irene Mound and Moundville are both Mississippian,<br />

while Carrier Mills is Archaic.<br />

Pete Klunk Mounds in west central Illinois is a Late Archaic (900 BC) site (Cook<br />

2002; Powell et al. 2005). This site only produced 22 individuals, with one of these, a<br />

young adult male 18-25 years, exhibiting evidence of treponemal disease. The<br />

characteristics of this individual include: thickened and rounded margins of the nasal<br />

aperture; small nasal spurs; the floor of the nasal cavity, the bony palate and the lacrimal<br />

canals displaying reactive new bone formation; the palate thickened with a small<br />

perforation; the anterior nasal spine somewhat resorbed, broad and irregular; and the<br />

112


midline crest irregular, porous and raised (Cook 2002). All of these characteristics can be<br />

found in the gangosa deformity of yaws (Ibid.).<br />

Pete Klunk Mounds and Carrier Mills do not seem to have many similarities,<br />

except for the fact that the most severe case at both sites is male. Cook (2002) concluded<br />

that the characteristics found in the young adult male at Pete Klunk were those of<br />

gangosa from yaws. None of the individuals examined at Carrier Mills had the gangosa<br />

deformity. It is possible that the characteristics visible in the Carrier Mills site belong to<br />

a different syndrome of treponemal disease. Perhaps this syndrome is an earlier form of<br />

yaws that did not have advanced gangosa deformity.<br />

Eva II is a late Middle Archaic (5000-3000 BC) site in western Tennessee with<br />

approximately 71 adults and adolescents recovered from the site (Powell et al. 2005).<br />

Two burials exhibit characteristics of treponemal disease. Burial 11 is a middle adult<br />

male that exhibits the following characteristics: surface pitting, round depressions with<br />

radiating striae, and raised areas of bone with multiple shallow round depressions on the<br />

frontal and parietals; the palate is perforated; there is periostitis on the ribs, left humerus,<br />

left radius, left fibula, right clavicle, both femora, and both tibiae (Ibid.). The second is<br />

Burial 36, an adult of indeterminate age and sex, although Powell et al. (2005) state that<br />

this was probably a male. This adult exhibits several characteristics: the frontal and right<br />

posterior parietal have thickened cortical bone with circular depressions; there are also<br />

stellate scars, circumvallate lesions and areas of porosity on the cranium; 6 rib fragments<br />

have lesions on the dorsal surface which are circular depressions with woven bone; the<br />

left tibia and both femora exhibit nodular cavitation; the left clavicle has lesions that are<br />

113


coalescing and penetrating; the distal metaphysis of the left humerus is thickened; and the<br />

midshaft of the right radius has reactive bone and superficial cavitation (Ibid.).<br />

Eva II (EII) and Carrier Mills (CM) have many similarities. All three burials with<br />

major symptoms appear to be males (EII 11, 36, and CM 38). The frontal and parietals<br />

have multiple shallow round depressions and surface pitting, and periostitis is seen in<br />

multiple long bones including the femora, tibiae, fibulae, and radii. The frontal lesions of<br />

CM Burial 38 show focal superficial cavitation. Powell et al. (2005) conclude that this is<br />

a non-venereal treponemal disease due to the fact that there is no evidence found for<br />

congenital cases or the characteristic dental stigmata of congenital syphilis.<br />

The Barrett site is in the Green River Valley of McLean County, Kentucky. This<br />

site includes 412 individuals: 237 adults, 41 children, 101 infants, and 33 individuals of<br />

undetermined age. The Archaic site dates to 5620 BP or 4520 BP according to new<br />

radiocarbon dates (Powell et al. 2005). Pathological changes in this sample include a<br />

high frequency of lesions involving the nasal cavity, palate and face that are resorptive in<br />

nature (Ibid.). The palates display pitting and a large incisive foramen. The crania<br />

exhibit lesions of the vault that include clustered pits, radial scars, circumvallate<br />

cavitation, and confluent clustered pits (Ibid.). The postcranial skeleton exhibits diffuse<br />

pitting, linear striations, periosteal plaques, remodeled and active lesions of which the<br />

tibia and fibula are the most affected (Ibid.).<br />

The skeletal materials from Barrett and Carrier Mills have a few similarities.<br />

Again they differ in the characteristics involving the face. The Barrett skeletal collection<br />

has many characteristics of the gangosa deformity, while Carrier Mills does not. Carrier<br />

Mills Burial 38 exhibits focal superficial cavitation and clustered pits on the cranium,<br />

114


similar to what is seen at Barrett. Both Barrett and Carrier Mills individuals exhibit<br />

linear striations, periosteal plaques, and remodeled lesions of the tibiae, fibulae, and<br />

femora.<br />

The last site is that of Indian Knoll from the Archaic (3352-2013 BC) period<br />

located along the Green River in western Ohio County, Kentucky (Cassidy 1972; Powell<br />

et al. 2005). This site includes 1234 skeletons (Cassidy 1972). The original analysis of<br />

this site was performed by Snow (1948), who concluded that syphilis was present in this<br />

population based on 4 affected individuals. Burial 9 is that of a young woman with<br />

palatine and maxillae involvement; Burial 13 is that of a young woman whose nasal<br />

aperture exhibits scarred, rounded over borders; Burial 508 is that of a young man who<br />

has similar characteristics to those of Burial 9; and Burial 490, the most affected<br />

individual, has lesions on the frontal, maxillae, hard palate, humerus and radii (Ibid.).<br />

The humerus includes sinus formation and drainage, while the radii exhibit “lace-like<br />

fenestration” of bone (Snow 1948:506).<br />

Cassidy (1972) examined 285 individuals from Indian Knoll; 70 of those were<br />

affected in some way, and she diagnosed the characteristics as those of endemic<br />

treponematosis. The analysis revealed that 2.4 % of the Indian Knoll individuals were<br />

affected from all age groups (see Cassidy 1972 for a complete chart of the individuals<br />

affected). The characteristics found include: thickening of the periosteal surface, raised<br />

discolored vascular plaques, thickened cortexes, narrow longitudinal striations, smooth<br />

billowed areas, and swollen bones perforated by sinuses and bowed (Ibid.). The bones<br />

affected include the tibia, fibula, femur, ulna, radius, humerus, clavicle, ribs, zygomatics,<br />

and frontal (Ibid.).<br />

115


Kelley (1980) conducted a study of 813 individuals from Indian Knoll. Twenty-<br />

eight (3.4%) of these individuals were diagnosed as having characteristics of treponemal<br />

disease. Eight adults, 4 males and 4 females, between the ages of 20-35 years and 20<br />

juveniles between the ages of 1-3 years exhibited destructive lesions of the nasal, palatal<br />

and calvarial bones, bowing and swelling of long bone shafts in children and infants, and<br />

saber tibiae (Ibid.). No dental stigmata were found, which the author concluded was<br />

indicative of nonvenereal treponemal disease (Ibid.). For a complete list of burials and<br />

their characteristics, see Kelley (1980).<br />

Indian Knoll and Carrier Mills also share similarities. Both have raised,<br />

discolored, vascular plaques, narrow longitudinal striations, swollen bones, bowed bones,<br />

sinus formation and saber shin tibiae. Neither site produced any evidence of dental<br />

stigmata.<br />

In comparing Carrier Mills to these other sites, there are many similarities and<br />

there are some differences. The biggest difference is the absence of nasal resorption or<br />

the characteristics of the gangosa deformity in Carrier Mills. Perhaps the Carrier Mills<br />

individuals suffered from another form of nonvenereal treponemal disease similar to<br />

yaws / endemic syphilis suggested for the other sites, but not quite the same. What is<br />

clear is that there was a nonvenereal form of treponematosis present and in fact<br />

widespread in this sub-sample from Carrier Mills.<br />

5.3 Carrier Mills – Life in the Archaic Period<br />

116


The majority of the burials from the Black Earth site of the Carrier Mills<br />

Archaeological District are dated to 4000 – 2900 BC, the Middle to Late Archaic periods.<br />

Before inferences can be made about life at Carrier Mills during the Archaic period, it is<br />

pertinent to give a general description of the Middle to Late Archaic periods. This<br />

description will aid in the understanding of life during the Archaic time period.<br />

5.3.1 General Middle and Late Archaic Period<br />

Muller (1986) characterizes the Middle Archaic in the Lower Ohio River Valley<br />

as a time of increased sedentism, an increased use of a wider variety of plants, the<br />

exploitation of small game, and the cultivation of seeds, all occurring during a much drier<br />

and warmer climate than today.<br />

The Late Archaic period, according to Muller (1986), was a time when a more<br />

complex social and economic organization began to develop but without social<br />

distinction between people, and domesticated plants were utilized to a much greater<br />

degree. Long-distance exchange systems also began to develop. Evidence of these<br />

exchange systems is seen through the presences of such materials as conch shell and<br />

copper objects found at Carrier Mills. The Late Archaic was also a period when we<br />

begin to see the first archaeological evidence of cemeteries and perhaps (also indicative<br />

of increased sedentism), in some areas, the emergence of achieved status (Muller 1986).<br />

5.3.2 Inferences of Life at Carrier Mills<br />

Life of the Carrier Mills Archaic peoples must have been very harsh. There were<br />

many changes occurring in the environment. People were accessing new resources and<br />

117


learning how to better utilize older ones; small game animals, plants, and nuts. They<br />

were discovering that a sedentary lifestyle had fewer benefits than a hunter-gatherer<br />

lifestyle. Living in settled groups provided more protection from enemies, and better<br />

hunting strategies, but the availability of a broad range of foods decreased. People were<br />

forced to rely on certain crops and if these crops failed, malnutrition became a serious<br />

problem.<br />

Examining the paleopathological evidence from Carrier Mills, it can be concluded<br />

that this sample suffered from an endemic treponemal disease, very similar to yaws. This<br />

disease affected both juveniles and adults. In this study, the adults appeared to exhibit<br />

considerably more advanced stages of the disease than the juveniles, but in the overall<br />

skeletal sample of Carrier Mills there is evidence of a high infant mortality rate, with<br />

27% of the population dying within the first year of life (Bassett 1982). It must be<br />

remembered that 100% of those dying as juveniles had some expression of bony effects<br />

from the disease (or other infection).<br />

Yaws is acquired in childhood and is seen more commonly in children and<br />

adolescents. In this study, there were not any children (aged 4-11 years) included and<br />

there were only two adolescents. Of the 9 infants that were examined, some of them<br />

were missing their hands, tibiae, fibulae, and foot bones. These factors could be the<br />

reasons why the adults show a considerably higher amount of infection than the juveniles<br />

– an artifact of preservation, sampling strategy, and overall illness of the population.<br />

Yaws would have been a major stressor in this population. In a study of the<br />

juvenile tibial growth patterns of the Carrier Mills sample, Anderson (1998) found that<br />

the growth patterns in the Carrier Mills juveniles closely resembled the tibial growth<br />

118


patterns of children from South America suffering from chronic malnourishment. This<br />

form of stress then would be chronic, and not episodic, resulting in no recovery period<br />

from the stressor. Yaws would have infected this population for long periods of time.<br />

Thus, if a juvenile contracted the disease and lived into adulthood, the individual would<br />

have suffered through the three different phases of the disease. The individual would<br />

have had many lesions on the skin, with some of the lesions excreting pus. Since the<br />

disease affected the individual throughout his/her lifetime, there would not be time for<br />

periods of recovery from other stressors.<br />

In the study of the wild gorillas by Levréro et al. (2007), the third stage of yaws<br />

caused deep lesions to occur that cause necrosis of the surrounding tissues. The lesions<br />

found in the gorilla population were mainly located on their faces. These deep lesions<br />

produced gangosa, which results in death of the tissues of the nose and lips. Some<br />

deformities of the jaws were also recorded (Ibid.). Most (70%) of the gorillas suffered<br />

from type A lesions which are pinkish, smooth lesions with oozing surfaces (Ibid.). Only<br />

19% of the affected gorillas suffered from type C lesions, which are deep, mutilating<br />

lesions. The gorillas with type C lesions exhibited difficulties in chewing, due to the<br />

absence of lips, or in some cases deformities of the jaws (Ibid.). Locomotion was also<br />

hindered for some of the individuals due to their inability to rest their limbs on the ground<br />

because of the lesions.<br />

If we look back at this study of Carrier Mills, there are only six individuals with<br />

nasal/palatal involvement; 1 is a young adult and five are middle adults. This<br />

demonstrates that the individuals would have had the disease for a length of time because<br />

these characteristics are occurring in older individuals. Usually it is in the third stage that<br />

119


we see destructive lesions, although in the Carrier Mills study, no extreme cases of<br />

gangosa were found. If the individuals were suffering from fleshy lesions on or around<br />

the nose and lips, this would hinder their sense of smell and their ability to eat, therefore<br />

resulting in chronic malnourishment. If the women were pregnant, suffering from the<br />

complications of eating, they would have been malnourished but their babies would have<br />

also been malnourished. Maybe this is one of the reasons for the chronic malnourishment<br />

found in Anderson’s (1998) study of the Carrier Mills individuals, although the level of<br />

oral infection was not high.<br />

Van Arsdale’s (1998), study of vertebral osteoarthritis at Carrier Mills found that<br />

adult males suffered harsher lifestyles than adult females. In this study, adult males are<br />

affected far more than adult females, but both sexes would have suffered consequences in<br />

providing for their families. The adult male life in the Archaic period must have been<br />

laden with disease, complicated by the stresses of hunting and other activities while<br />

dealing with the complications of a treponemal disease similar to yaws. Individuals<br />

whose hands and feet were affected would have had complications in walking, picking up<br />

tools, making tools, and the many different tasks associated with hunting such as<br />

preparing the kill for the journey back to the village. For women, the complications<br />

would involve problems with gathering berries, caring for the young, not being able to<br />

walk and difficulties in preparing food. Fishing may have also been an important activity<br />

for both sexes at Carrier Mills, one made more difficult for the many individuals with<br />

infected hands.<br />

Other complications that might arise would be with communication. Severe<br />

destruction of the face could result in a harsh voice (Powell and Cook 2005). Loss of<br />

120


teeth and the hard palate would result in difficulty in speaking and eating. Nonetheless,<br />

the skeletons of most adults overall are those of robust and strong individuals (Bassett<br />

1982; Clapper 2006). Levréro et al. (2007) state that yaws is rarely lethal. In their study<br />

of the gorilla population, only one female gorilla disappeared from the population being<br />

studied. Other gorillas survived as long as the two years and eight months of the study<br />

with serious handicaps (Ibid.). Perhaps then death resulted from general infection or<br />

maybe death was the result of chronic malnourishment.<br />

5.4 History and Origin of Treponemal Disease<br />

This study of the Carrier Mills skeletal sample contributes to the hypothesis that a<br />

non-venereal form of treponemal disease existed in North America at least 3000 years<br />

before the present. The majority of the burials from the Black Earth site of Area A are<br />

dated to the Middle to Late Archaic, spanning a time period of 4000 – 2900 BC. This<br />

means that the most conservative date for the presence of a yaws type of infection in<br />

North America would be 4900 years before present, and the earliest date could be 6000<br />

years before present. Therefore, a yaws-like treponematosis was likely in North America<br />

long before Columbus and his crew arrived in 1492 AD.<br />

Recently Rothschild (2003) suggested that the earliest evidence for treponemal<br />

infection similar to yaws was at the Windover site in Florida, 7900 years BP. However,<br />

the Windover site has not yet been confirmed as the oldest site in North America<br />

exhibiting treponemal disease by any detailed pathological analysis of the skeletal<br />

collection. Walker et al. (2005) propose that collections from the Santa Barbara Channel<br />

121


Area of Southern California (4000 – 5000 years ago) are some of the oldest remains<br />

exhibiting evidence for treponemal disease in the Western Hemisphere.<br />

The presence of a yaws-like treponemal infection at Carrier Mills provides the<br />

earliest evidence for treponematosis in Illinois at 6000 – 4900 BP, and perhaps the oldest<br />

well-documented evidence in the Western Hemisphere. The second oldest site discussed<br />

in Illinois is the Pete Klunk site, which dates to 2900 BP (Powell et al. 2005). Other sites<br />

from Illinois include Morton Mounds, Fisher, Parker Heights, Rose Mounds, Gibson, J<br />

Gay, L Gay, Ledders, and Yokem all dating from 1000 BC to AD 1000 (Powell et al.<br />

2005).<br />

As discussed in Chapter 2, the first hypothesis concerning the origin of syphilis is<br />

the “Columbian theory” whose supporters believe that Columbus and his crew brought<br />

venereal syphilis back to Europe from the Americas. The Carrier Mills study does not<br />

support this hypothesis, as it was a non-venereal form of treponemal disease that existed<br />

in this sample, namely yaws. Thus, unless yaws transformed to venereal syphilis in the<br />

ships crossing the Atlantic Ocean, Columbus and his crew could not have brought back<br />

venereal syphilis from North America to Europe.<br />

The second hypothesis, the “Pre-Columbian theory”, suggests that venereal<br />

syphilis existed in Europe long before Columbus’ journey to the New World and that<br />

Columbus brought the disease to the Americas. As detailed above, this study proves that<br />

a non-venereal form of treponemal disease, most like yaws, did exist in North America<br />

before Columbus’ journey. The Pre-Columbian theory can only be true if we include the<br />

evidence of non-venereal treponemal disease as evidence of the existence of the<br />

122


treponematoses, which could include venereal syphilis, in North America before<br />

Columbus’ journey.<br />

The other three hypotheses; Livingston’s Alternative Hypothesis, the Unitarian<br />

and the Non-Unitarian hypotheses, are all hypotheses suggesting early presence of<br />

treponemal disease in the Old World. Was there only a single treponematosis existing in<br />

both the Old and New Worlds before Columbus’ journey that evolved into the other<br />

syndromes following the evolution of humans through time? Alternatively, was there<br />

one treponematosis that began as an animal infection, eventually infecting humans and<br />

evolving into the different syndromes of treponemal disease as a result of the pathogen<br />

adapting to different environmental circumstances? This study alone does not attempt to<br />

answer these questions. Perhaps if we examine a broad range of studies involving<br />

treponemal disease, these types of questions can be answered. Therefore, further<br />

research into the theories of development of treponemal disease needs to be undertaken.<br />

5.5 Conclusions<br />

This study found that a treponemal disease likely did affect the Carrier Mills<br />

sample. This syndrome was most similar to that of yaws, but not precisely identical to<br />

the pattern of symptoms seen in modern yaws. Other researchers believe that it is<br />

possible that another form of treponematosis did exist thousands of years ago (Baker and<br />

Armelagos 1988), with many evolutionary changes having occurred since then. We<br />

know that gradual change does occur over time within plants, animals and even in<br />

bacteria, so it is possible that another form of treponematosis did exist thousands of years<br />

123


ago. This would account for the many similarities found in the Carrier Mills individuals<br />

to the treponemal disease of yaws. The treponemal disease in this study is most like<br />

yaws, but it is more widespread, occurring in the population far more frequently. It is<br />

almost as if this treponemal disease was a “super-" or a "hyper-yaws”.<br />

Life in the Archaic of Carrier Mills must have been harsh, with a yaws-like<br />

treponematosis affecting all age groups, possibly causing high infant mortality rates but<br />

also affecting people throughout their lifetimes. As for the debate on the origin of<br />

treponemal disease, this research strongly favors the hypothesis that a non-venereal form<br />

of treponematoses existed in North America before Columbus’ historic journey.<br />

Therefore, Columbus most likely did not return to Europe with venereal syphilis<br />

contracted from the peoples of the Americas. However, it could be possible that<br />

Columbus and his crew returned to Europe with a non-venereal form of treponematosis<br />

from the Americas, but this would not explain the epidemic of venereal syphilis in 16 th<br />

century Europe.<br />

124


LITERATURE CITED<br />

Anderson LS. 1998. Modifications in the Rate and Timing of Growth Events in the Tibia<br />

as a Measure of a Prehistoric Populations Developmental Response to<br />

Environmental Circumstances. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology,<br />

Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.<br />

Armelagos GJ. 1969. Disease in Ancient Nubia. Science 163(3864):255-259.<br />

Aufderheide AC, Rodríguez-Martín C. 1998. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human<br />

Paleopathology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 154-171.<br />

Baker BJ, Armelagos GJ. 1988. The Origin and Antiquity of Syphilis: Paleopathological<br />

Diagnosis and Interpretation. Curr Anthropol 29(5):703-737.<br />

Bassett EJ. 1982. Osteological Analysis of Carrier Mills Burials. In: Jeffries RW, Butler<br />

BM, editors. The Carrier Mills Archaeological Project: Human Adaptation in the<br />

Saline Valley, Illinois Volume II. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.<br />

Center For Archaeological Investigations, Research Paper No 33. p 1028-1114.<br />

Bogdan G, Weaver DS. 1992. Pre-Columbian Treponematosis in Coastal North Carolina.<br />

In: Verano JW, Ubelaker DH, editors. Disease and Demography in the Americas.<br />

Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. p 155-163.<br />

125


Brandon EM. 1986. Dietary Inferences from Dental Features of Carrier Mills, Illinois<br />

Burials. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University,<br />

Carbondale.<br />

Brothwell D. 1970. The Real History of Syphilis. Science Journal 6(9):27-33.<br />

Buckley HR, Tayles N. 2003. Skeletal Pathology in a Prehistoric Pacific Island Sample:<br />

Issues in Lesion Recording, Quantification, and Interpretation. Am J Phys<br />

Anthropol 122:303-324.<br />

Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. 1994. Standards For Data Collection From Human Skeletal<br />

Remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series No. 44. Fayetteville,<br />

AR: Arkansas Archaeological Survey.<br />

Cassidy CM. 1972. A Comparison of Nutrition and Health in Pre-Agricultural and<br />

Agricultural AmerIndian Skeletal Populations. PhD Dissertation, Department of<br />

Human Biology, University of Wisconsin.<br />

Clapper T. 2006. The New World and the Natufian: Musculoskeletal Stress Markers of<br />

Hunter-Gatherer Lifeways. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Southern<br />

Illinois University, Carbondale.<br />

126


Cockburn A. 1963. The Treponematoses. In: The Evolution and Eradication of Infectious<br />

Diseases. Baltimore: The John Hopkins Press. p 152-174.<br />

Colby RA, Kerr DA, Robinson HBG. 1971. Color Atlas of Oral Pathology. Third edition.<br />

Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Company. p 48.<br />

Cook DC. 1993. Dental Evidence for Congenital Syphilis (and its absence) Before and<br />

After the Conquest of the New World. In: Dutour O, Palfy G, Berato J, Brun JP,<br />

editors. The Origin of Syphilis in Europe: Before or After 1493? Toulon: Centre<br />

Archeologique Du Var. p 169-175.<br />

Cook DC. 2002. Rhinomaxillary Syndrome in the Absence of Leprosy: An Exercise in<br />

Differential Diagnosis. In: Roberts C, Lewis ME, Manchester K, editors. The Past<br />

and Present of Leprosy: Archaeological, Historical, Paleopathological, and Clinical<br />

Approaches. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 81-88.<br />

Crane-Kramer GMM. 2002. Was There a Medieval Diagnostic Confusion Between<br />

Leprosy and Syphilis? An Examination of the Skeletal Evidence. In: Roberts C,<br />

Lewis ME, Manchester K, editors. The Past and Present of Leprosy:<br />

Archaeological, Historical, Paleopathological, and Clinical Approaches. Oxford:<br />

Archaeopress. p. 111-119.<br />

127


Crosby, Jr AW. 1969. The Early History of Syphilis: A Reappraisal. Am Anthropol New<br />

Series 71(2):218-227.<br />

Crosby, Jr AW. 1972. The Early History of Syphilis: A Reappraisal. In: The Columbian<br />

Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492. Connecticut: Greenwood<br />

Publishing Company. p 123-164.<br />

Douglas MT, Pietrusewsky M, Ikehara – Quebral RM. 1997. Skeletal Biology of<br />

Apurguan: A Precontact Chamorro Site on Guam. Am J Phys Anthropol 104:291-<br />

313.<br />

Hackett CJ. 1967. The Human Treponematoses. In: Brothwell D, Sandison AT, editors.<br />

Diseases in Antiquity: A Survey of the Diseases, Injuries, and Surgery of Early<br />

Populations. Springfield: Thomas Books. p152-169.<br />

Hillson S. 1996. Dental Anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p<br />

171-172.<br />

Hillson S, Grigson C, Bond S. 1998. Dental Defects of Congenital Syphilis. Am J Phys<br />

Anthropol 107:25-40.<br />

Holcomb RC. 1934. Christopher Columbus, and the American Origin of Syphilis. United<br />

States Naval Medical Bulletin 32(4):401-430.<br />

128


Hudson EH. 1965. Treponematosis and Man’s Social Evolution. Am Anthropol New<br />

Series 67(4):885-901.<br />

Hutchinson DL, Richman R. 2006. Regional, Social, and Evolutionary Perspectives on<br />

Treponemal Infection in the Southeastern United States. Am J Phys Anthropol<br />

129:544-558.<br />

Hutten, U von. 1540. Of the Wood Called Guaiacum. London: Thomas Bertheletregii.<br />

Jacobi KP, Cook DC, Corruccini RS, Handler JS. 1992. Congenital Syphilis in the Past:<br />

Slaves at Newton Plantation, Barbados, West Indies. Am J Phys Anthropol 89:145-<br />

158.<br />

Jefferies RW. 1982a. The Black Earth Site: Chronological Framework. In: Jeffries RW,<br />

Butler BM, editors. The Carrier Mills Archaeological Project: Human Adaptation in<br />

the Saline Valley, Illinois Volume I. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.<br />

Center for Archaeological Investigations, Research Paper No 33. p 101-103.<br />

Jefferies RW. 1982b. The Black Earth Site: Summary of Area A Burials. In: Jeffries RW,<br />

Butler BM, editors. The Carrier Mills Archaeological Project: Human Adaptation in<br />

the Saline Valley, Illinois Volume I. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.<br />

Center for Archaeological Investigations, Research Paper No 33. p 187-193.<br />

129


Jefferies RW, Morrow CA. 1982. The Carrier Mills Archaeological Project: An<br />

Introduction. In: Jeffries RW, Butler BM, editors. The Carrier Mills Archaeological<br />

Project: Human Adaptation in the Saline Valley, Illinois Volume I. Southern Illinois<br />

University at Carbondale. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Research Paper<br />

No 33. p 1-34.<br />

Kelley MA. 1980. Disease and Environment: A Comparative Analysis of Three Early<br />

American Indian Skeletal Collections. PhD Dissertation, Department of<br />

Anthropology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland.<br />

Larsen CS. 1997. Bioarchaeology: Interpreting Behaviors from the Human Skeleton.<br />

Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 93-99.<br />

Larsen MD. 1981. An Analysis of Possible Relationships Between Stress Indicators in<br />

the Carrier Mills Skeletal Population. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology,<br />

Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.<br />

Levréro F, Gatti S, Gautier-Hion A, Ménard N. 2007. Yaws Disease in a Wild Gorilla<br />

Population and Its Impact on the Reproductive Status of Males. Am J Phys<br />

Anthropol 132:568-575.<br />

130


Livingstone FB. 1991. On the Origin of Syphilis: An Alternative Hypothesis. Curr<br />

Anthropol 32(5):587-590.<br />

Lovell NC. 2000. Paleopathological Description and Diagnosis. In: Katzenberg MA,<br />

Saunders SR, editors. Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton. New York:<br />

Wiley-Liss. p 217-248.<br />

Lukens R, editor. 2005. Stedman’s Medical Dictionary for the Health Professions and<br />

Nursing. 5 th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.<br />

Lynch BM. 1982. Mortuary Behavior in the Carrier Mills Archaeological District. In:<br />

Jeffries RW, Butler BM, editors. The Carrier Mills Archaeological Project: Human<br />

Adaptation in the Saline Valley, Illinois Volume II. Southern Illinois University at<br />

Carbondale. Center For Archaeological Investigations, Research Paper No 33. p<br />

1117-1232.<br />

Manchester K, Roberts C. 1989. The Paleopathology of Leprosy in Britain: A Review.<br />

World Archaeology 21:2:265-272.<br />

Miller MH. 1981. The Role of Postcranial Nonmetric Traits in Carrier Mills, Illinois<br />

Burials. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University,<br />

Carbondale.<br />

131


Mitchell PD. 2003. Pre-Columbian Treponemal Disease From 14 th Century AD Safed,<br />

Israel, and Implications for the Medieval Eastern Mediterranean. Am J Phys<br />

Anthropol 121:117-124.<br />

Muller J. 1986. Archaeology of the Lower Ohio River Valley. Orlando: Academic Press,<br />

Inc. p 45-82.<br />

Ortner DJ. 2003. Identification of Pathological Conditions in Human Skeletal Remains.<br />

2 nd edition. Amsterdam: Academic Press. p 227-319.<br />

Pindborg JJ. 1970. Pathology of the Dental Hard Tissues. Philadelphia: WB Saunders<br />

Company. p 99-104.<br />

Pook S. 2001. Pox-Ridden Monks Disprove Columbus Theory of Syphilis. The Daily<br />

Telegraph (London).<br />

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2000/07/24/npox24.xml.<br />

Powell ML. 1991. Endemic Treponematosis and Tuberculosis in the Prehistoric<br />

Southeastern United States: Biological Costs of Chronic Endemic Disease. In:<br />

Ortner DJ, Aufderheide AC, editors. Human Paleopathology Current Syntheses and<br />

Future Options. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. p 173-180.<br />

132


Powell ML. 1992. Health and Disease in the Late Prehistoric Southeast. In: Verano JW,<br />

Ubelaker DH, editors. Disease and Demography in the Americas. Washington:<br />

Smithsonian Institution Press. p 41-53.<br />

Powell ML, Bogdan G, Cook DC, Sanford MK, Smith MO, Weaver DS. 2005.<br />

Treponematosis Before 1000 BC? The Skeletal Evidence. In: Powell ML, Cook<br />

DC, editors. The Myth of Syphilis: The Natural History of Treponematosis in North<br />

America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. p 418-441.<br />

Powell ML, Cook DC 2005.The Myth of Syphilis: The Natural History of<br />

Treponematosis in North America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.<br />

Roberts C, Manchester K. 1995. The Archaeology of Disease 2 nd edition. Ithaca, New<br />

York: Cornell University Press. p 150-159.<br />

Rodríquez-Martín C. 2000. Historical Background of the Human Treponematoses.<br />

Chungará (Arica) 32(2): ISSN 0717-7356 versión on-line.<br />

Rothschild BM. 2000. Preconceived Notions and Hypothesis Testing: Holes in the Blue<br />

Hole. Chungará (Arica) 32(2): ISSN 0717-7356 versión on-line.<br />

Rothschild BM. 2003. Infectious Processes Around the Dawn of Civilization. In:<br />

Greenblatt CL, Spigelman M, editors. Emerging Pathogens: The Archaeology,<br />

133


Ecology, and Evolution of Infectious Disease. Oxford, UK: Oxford University<br />

Press. p 103-116.<br />

Rothschild BM. 2005. History of Syphilis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 40:1454-1463.<br />

Rothschild BM, Calderon FL, Coppa A, Rothschild C. 2000. First European Exposure to<br />

Syphilis: The Dominican Republic at the Time of Columbian Contact. Clinical<br />

Infectious Diseases 31:936-41.<br />

Rothschild BM, Coppa A, Petrone PP. 2004. “Like a Virgin”: Absence of Rheumatoid<br />

Arthritis and Treponematosis, Good Sanitation and Only Rare Gout in Italy Prior to<br />

the 15 th Century. Reumatismo 56(1):61-66.<br />

Rothschild BM, Hershkovitz I, Rothschild C. 1995. Origin of Yaws in the Pleistocene.<br />

Nature 378(23):343-344.<br />

Rothschild BM, Rothschild C. 1996. Treponemal Disease in the New World. Curr<br />

Anthropol 37(3):555-561.<br />

Salt C (Director). 2002. Secrets of the Dead: The Syphilis Enigma (videotape). New<br />

York: Thirteen/WNET.<br />

134


Shafer WG, Hine MK, Levy BM. 1974. A Textbook of Oral Pathology. 3 rd edition,<br />

illustrated. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company. p 51.<br />

Smith MO. 2006. Treponemal Disease in the Middle Archaic to Early Woodland Periods<br />

of the Western Tennessee River Valley. Am J Phys Anthropol 131:205-217.<br />

Snow CE. 1948. Indian Knoll Skeletons of Site OH2 Ohio County Kentucky. Reports in<br />

Anthropology Volume IV, Number 3, Part II. University of Kentucky, Lexington. p<br />

498-509.<br />

Steinbock RT. 1976. Paleopathological Diagnosis and Interpretation: Bone Diseases in<br />

Ancient Human Populations. Springfield, IL: Thomas Books.<br />

Steyn M, Henneberg M. 1995. Pre-Columbian Presence of Treponemal Disease: A<br />

Possible Case From Iron Age Southern Africa. Curr Anthropol 36:5:869-873.<br />

Van Arsdale C. 1998. Differential Patterning of Vertebral Osteoarthritis as an Indicator of<br />

Sexual Division of Labor in a Hunting and Gathering Population. M.A. Thesis,<br />

Department of Anthropology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.<br />

Walker PL, Lambert PM, Schultz M, Erlandson JM. 2005. The Evolution of Treponemal<br />

Disease in the Santa Barbara Channel Area of Southern California. In: Powell ML,<br />

135


Cook DC, editors. The Myth of Syphilis: The Natural History of Treponematosis in<br />

North America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. p 281-305.<br />

136


APPENDICES


APPENDIX A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES IN THIS STUDY<br />

Names of Yaws Bejel Venereal<br />

Diseases Syphilis<br />

Parameters<br />

% of Population 20-40% 20-40% 2-14%<br />

Age Groups Primarily Primarily Subadults<br />

Child, Adol; Child 2-10; & Adults<br />

Adults Subadults; of sexual<br />

Adults maturity<br />

Bone Groups Median Few Few<br />

Skeletal Involvement 5-15%<br />

Common Bones Affected Tibia 99% Tibia 99% Parietal &<br />

Frontal;<br />

Tibia 99%<br />

Bones Affected<br />

Skull X - X<br />

Tibia X X X<br />

Fibula X X X<br />

Clavicle X X X<br />

Femur X - X<br />

Ulna X X X<br />

Radius X X X<br />

Hands X X -<br />

Feet X X -<br />

Humerus - - X<br />

Sternum - - X<br />

Vertebrae - - X (Cervical)<br />

Nasal/Palatal X X X<br />

Nasal Bones X X X<br />

Other Changes<br />

Joints Affected - - Knee, Elbow,<br />

Shoulder<br />

Cranial Changes - - Outer surface<br />

sutures not crossed<br />

Periosteal Reaction X X X<br />

Osteitis X X X<br />

Congenital Transmission Possible No Yes<br />

137


APPENDIX A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES IN THIS STUDY, continued.<br />

Names of Yaws Bejel Venereal<br />

Diseases<br />

Characteristic Features<br />

Syphilis<br />

Symmetrical Dacty- Nasal-Palatal Nasal-Palatal<br />

destruction -<br />

litis, Gangosa, destruction - rare, empty<br />

nasal cavity,<br />

Periostitis, joint Periostitis of short<br />

bones of hand &<br />

smooth<br />

swelling, Fibula<br />

feet, lateral walls,<br />

tunnel-like<br />

rarely deformed, Fusiform enlarge- passageradius/ulna<br />

bowed ment way, Caries sicca<br />

Angulation of fingers bone deposition, Cardiovascular &<br />

Shortened fingers Little medullary central nervous<br />

systems,<br />

Saber shin tibia changes,<br />

unilateral<br />

Saber shin tibia tibial involvement<br />

Saber shin tibia<br />

Geographic<br />

Locations<br />

X = affected<br />

- = not sure if<br />

affected<br />

138<br />

Africa, Latin America E Mediterranean Worldwide<br />

Carribean SW Asia but more<br />

SE Asia Sub-Saharan in Urban areas<br />

N Australia Africa<br />

New Guinea North America<br />

North America (rural areas)<br />

(rural areas)<br />

Sources: Ortner 2003, Hackett 1976, Rothschild et al. 2000, Aufderheide & Rodriguez-<br />

Martin 1998, Rothschild et al.<br />

2004


APPENDIX A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES IN THIS STUDY, cont.<br />

Names of Congenital Tuberculosis Leprosy<br />

Diseases Syphilis<br />

Parameters<br />

% of Population<br />

Age Groups Primarily All ages; All ages;<br />

Fetus & 2:1 ratio of 2:1 ratio of<br />

Neonate; males to males to<br />

Infant females females<br />

Bone Groups - - -<br />

Skeletal Involvement - 3% 5%<br />

Common Bones Affected Spine; areas of Skull,<br />

cancellous bone; Hands & Feet<br />

long bones -<br />

metaphysis &<br />

epiphysis; cranial<br />

vault<br />

Bones Affected<br />

Skull X X X<br />

Tibia X - X<br />

Fibula - - X<br />

Clavicle - - -<br />

Femur X - -<br />

Ulna X - -<br />

Radius X - -<br />

Hands - X X<br />

Feet - X X<br />

Humerus - - -<br />

Sternum - X -<br />

Vertebrae - X (Thoracic,Lumbar) -<br />

Nasal/Palatal - - X<br />

Nasal Bones - X X<br />

Other Changes<br />

Joints Affected - Sacro-iliac, knee, -<br />

Ankle, shoulder<br />

elbow<br />

Cranial Changes - Inner surface -<br />

Periosteal Reaction X - -<br />

Osteitis X - -<br />

Congenital Transmission Solely No No<br />

139


APPENDIX A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES IN THIS STUDY, cont.<br />

Names of Congenital Tuberculosis Leprosy<br />

Diseases<br />

Characteristic Features<br />

Syphilis<br />

Osteochondritis, Bony ankylosis, Facies Leprosa,<br />

vertebral TB - pitting &<br />

Metaphysis,<br />

L1,<br />

vertebral<br />

perforation<br />

Periostitis,<br />

collapse, of palate & nasal<br />

septum,<br />

Hutchinson's incisor Spina ventosa, absorption<br />

Mulberry molars Desctruction of<br />

mandibular<br />

of anterior nasal<br />

Moon's molars<br />

angle spine, ascending<br />

absorption of<br />

max.<br />

alveolus, loosing<br />

& shedding of<br />

incisors &<br />

canines<br />

Geographic<br />

Locations<br />

X = affected<br />

- = not sure if<br />

affected<br />

140<br />

Worldwide<br />

Worldwide except for Arctic<br />

regions<br />

Rural areas<br />

Sources: Ortner 2003, Hackett 1976, Rothschild et al. 2000, Aufderheide & Rodriguez-<br />

Martin 1998, Rothschild et al.<br />

2004


APPENDIX A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES IN THIS STUDY, cont.<br />

Names of Osteosarcoma Meningioma Metastatic<br />

Diseases<br />

Parameters<br />

% of Population<br />

Older<br />

Carcinoma<br />

Age Groups Ancient populations individuals Most commonly<br />

under age 30<br />

males affected<br />

Average age 45 individuals over<br />

more<br />

than females<br />

age of 40<br />

Bone Groups - - -<br />

Skeletal Involvement - - -<br />

vertebrae,<br />

Common Bones Affected More common Spine, Cranium, pelvis,<br />

in longbones; Skull vault ribs, major long<br />

also affected flat bones, sternum,<br />

Bones Affected<br />

bones, skull with<br />

mandible most<br />

affected<br />

skull<br />

Skull X X X<br />

Tibia X - X<br />

Fibula X - -<br />

Clavicle - - -<br />

Femur X - X<br />

Ulna X - -<br />

Radius X - -<br />

Hands - - -<br />

Feet - - -<br />

Humerus X - X<br />

Sternum - - X<br />

Vertebrae - X X<br />

Nasal/Palatal - - -<br />

Nasal Bones<br />

Other Changes<br />

- - -<br />

Joints Affected Prox femur<br />

Head of humerus<br />

- -<br />

Cranial Changes - Inner surface -<br />

Periosteal Reaction - - -<br />

Osteitis - - -<br />

Congenital Transmission - - -<br />

141


APPENDIX A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES IN THIS STUDY, cont.<br />

Names<br />

of Osteosarcoma Meningioma Metastatic<br />

Diseases Carcinoma<br />

Characteristic Features<br />

Onion Skin Hyperostosis,<br />

thickening of<br />

pathologic<br />

fractures,<br />

appearance,<br />

the<br />

skull,<br />

vertebral collapse<br />

bone spicules per-<br />

spiculated with multiple<br />

pendicular to surface<br />

Sunburst Effect<br />

appearance bone lesions<br />

Sources: Ortner 2003, Hackett 1976, Rothschild et al. 2000, Aufderheide & Rodriguez-<br />

Martin 1998, Rothschild et al. 2004<br />

142


APPENDIX A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES IN THIS STUDY, cont.<br />

Names of Multiple Osteomyelitis Paget's Disease<br />

Diseases<br />

Parameters<br />

% of Population<br />

Myeloma<br />

Most common<br />

Age Groups Most commonly All age groups<br />

age<br />

individuals over group - individuals<br />

age of 40, males over 60, males<br />

more than<br />

more than<br />

females<br />

females<br />

Bone Groups - - -<br />

Skeletal Involvement<br />

Common Bones<br />

- - -<br />

Affected flat bones, skull, any bone, pelvis, femur,<br />

long bone meta- knee, distal tibia, skull, tibia,<br />

prox<br />

vertebrae,<br />

physes, femur, femur,humerus, clavicles,<br />

humerus, pelvis, uncommonly: ribs<br />

collapse of cervical vertebrae,<br />

Bones Affected<br />

vertebral body,<br />

ribs, scapula<br />

skull - frontal<br />

Skull X X Frontal X<br />

Tibia - X X<br />

Fibula - - -<br />

Clavicle X - X<br />

Femur X X X<br />

Ulna - - -<br />

Radius - - -<br />

Hands - - -<br />

Feet - - -<br />

Humerus X X -<br />

Sternum - - -<br />

Vertebrae X X Cervical X Lumbar<br />

Nasal/Palatal - - -<br />

Nasal Bones<br />

Other Changes<br />

- - -<br />

Joints Affected - knee -<br />

Cranial Changes internal & outer table inner & outer<br />

external tables, diploe<br />

Periosteal Reaction - - -<br />

Osteitis - - -<br />

Congenital<br />

Transmission - - -<br />

143


APPENDIX A. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF DISEASES IN THIS STUDY, cont.<br />

Names<br />

of Multiple Osteomyelitis Paget's Disease<br />

Diseases Myeloma<br />

Characteristic Features<br />

lytic lesions re- usually affects longbones =<br />

stricted to particular only 1 bone, thickening of cortex<br />

area, small, round, sequestrum, medullary cavity in<br />

tact,bone<br />

resorbing bone, involucrum<br />

resorption,<br />

scalloped edges,<br />

new bone<br />

formation,<br />

punched out thickening of<br />

appearance cranium, fissure-like<br />

stress fractures<br />

Sources: Ortner 2003, Hackett 1976, Rothschild et al. 2000, Aufderheide & Rodriguez-<br />

Martin 1998, Rothschild et al. 2004<br />

144


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

1 Old Adult >50% but Moderate Parietal - 3-5 foci inside skull; 1st meta-<br />

56 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS,<br />

continued.<br />

Degree<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete- of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

humerus - unifocal bone loss, osteitis; right<br />

femur - striations, osteitis; thoracic<br />

vertebrae - multifocal bone loss, compression;<br />

lumbar vertebrae - multifocal<br />

bone<br />

loss, schmorl's nodes on 2, compression<br />

Clavicle - both swollen, left has woven<br />

103 Old Adult >50% but Moderate bone;<br />

53 yrs 50% but None Calcaneus - woven bone; unilateral tibia -<br />

50 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

bodies, sacrum<br />

29 Mid Adult >50% but Slight Frontal - multifocal bone loss; calcaneus -<br />

44 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness *<br />

cranium<br />

* Notes<br />

unifocal, multifocal bone loss, deposition<br />

of woven bone, sclerotic reaction;<br />

unilateral<br />

other long bone - right humerus - osteitis,<br />

woven bone, multifocal bone loss, right<br />

radius - woven & sclerotic reaction,<br />

right ulna - sclerotic reaction, left ulna -<br />

woven bone; cervical - multifocal bone<br />

loss;<br />

thoracic - multifocal bone loss anterior<br />

body of 1; lumbar - sclerotic reaction<br />

anterior bodies of 2; periarticular resorptive<br />

foci - cervical -inferior superior bodies,<br />

thoracic - inferior bodies & 1 facet, lumbar<br />

-<br />

superior (4) & inferior (1) bodies<br />

45 Mid Adult comp. Slight Clavicle - osteitis on both, right - unifocal<br />

37 yrs 90% post- bone loss; ribs - 1st ribs - woven bone;<br />

cranial<br />

carpals - multifocal bone loss,<br />

Female comp.<br />

cranium<br />

metacarpalswoven<br />

bone, osteitis, hand phalanges -<br />

multifocal bone loss, osteitis;<br />

bilateral tibia - woven bone, striations;<br />

bilateral fibula - striations; bilateral<br />

other long bone - humerus - woven bone,<br />

femur - woven & sclerotic reaction,<br />

striations; cervical - compression; thoracicunifocal<br />

bone loss,<br />

compression, woven bone; lumbar -<br />

unifocal<br />

bone loss, compression, woven bone; periarticular<br />

resorptive foci -<br />

cervical bodies & facets, thoracic bodies &<br />

facets, lumbar bodies & facets, sacrum -<br />

1st vertebrae<br />

49 Mid Adult comp. Slight Metacarpals - unifocal bone loss, hand<br />

46 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

phalanges - unifocal bone loss; bilateral<br />

Male comp. tibia - woven bone, bowed<br />

medial lateral, striations, osteitis; bilateral<br />

fibula - striations, osteitis,sclerotic reaction;<br />

148


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness *<br />

cranium<br />

* Notes<br />

bilateral other long<br />

bone - radius - woven & sclerotic reaction,<br />

woven bone, femur - woven bone, sclerotic<br />

reaction; thoracic - fusion, compression,<br />

multifocal bone loss; lumbar -compression,<br />

multifocal bone loss; periarticular<br />

resorptive<br />

foci - cervical bodies & facets, thoracic<br />

bodies & facets, lumbar bodies, sacrum<br />

1st vertebrae<br />

65 Mid Adult comp. Moderate Clavicle - left - woven bone; intermediate<br />

49 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

phalanges swelled; metatarsals - multifocal<br />

Male comp. bone loss, woven & sclerotic reaction,<br />

unifocal bone loss, osteitis; unilateral tibiaright<br />

- woven bone, striations; unilateral<br />

fibula - don't know which side - osteitis;<br />

unilateral other long bone - right humerus -<br />

woven bone - smudge-like, right femur -<br />

woven bone, left femur -<br />

striations;thoracicfusion,<br />

compression, multifocal bone loss;<br />

lumbar - compression, multifocal bone<br />

loss; periarticular resorptive foci - thoracicsuperior<br />

& inferior bodies, lumbar -<br />

superior & inferior bodies, sacrum - 1st<br />

vertebrae<br />

72 Mid Adult >50% but None Metacarpals - unifocal bone loss; unilateral<br />

38 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

85 Mid Adult >50% but None Ribs - woven bone posterior & anterior of<br />

40 yrs 50% but Slight Nasal/palatal - porosity & coalescence of<br />

42 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness *<br />

cranial<br />

* Notes<br />

Male comp. carpals, hand phalanges - sclerotic<br />

reaction; tarsals, metatarsals - sclerotic<br />

reaction, metatarsals - unifocal bone loss;<br />

bilateral tibia - striations; unilateral tibia -<br />

right - sclerotic reaction; bilateral fibula -<br />

striations, sclerotic reaction;unilateral other<br />

long bone - right radius - swollen, striations,<br />

left radius - woven bone, deposit of woven<br />

bone, right humerus - unifocal bone loss;<br />

thoracic - T8-9 fused, unifocal multifocal<br />

bone loss; lumbar -fusion -L4-5, sacrum,<br />

coccyx, L2-3 - fused, L2 compression;<br />

periarticular resorptive foci - thoracic -<br />

articular surfaces of 6 affected -<br />

mostly inferior, cervical - bodies & facet<br />

94 Mid Adult >50% but None Clavicle - both woven & sclerotic reaction,<br />

44 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

bilateral tibia - striations; unilateral tibia -<br />

right - bowed medial-lateral, unifocal bone<br />

loss; bilateral fibula - striations; bilateral<br />

other long bone - femur -unifocal bone loss,<br />

striations; unilateral other long bone -<br />

right radius - unifocal bone loss, swollen,<br />

left ulna - unifocal bone loss; thoracic -<br />

unifocal bone loss; lumbar - schmorl's<br />

nodes<br />

104 Mid Adult >50% but Moderate Parietal - unifocal multifocal bone loss;<br />

46 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness *<br />

cranial<br />

* Notes<br />

Male comp.<br />

cranium<br />

loss, metatarsals - sclerotic reaction,<br />

unifocal multifocal bone loss, woven bone,<br />

cloacae, circumscription, foot phalanges -<br />

unifocal bone loss, abnormal shape, woven<br />

bone; bilateral tibia - striations, sclerotic<br />

reaction; unilateral fibula - radius - flared/<br />

swollen, femur - striations; thoracic - some<br />

bodies are angled to the left, unifocal bone<br />

loss; lumbar - unifocal multifocal bone loss;<br />

periarticular resorptive foci - thoracic -<br />

transverse processes of 4<br />

121 Mid Adult comp. None Palatal - porosity, bump of bone; clavicle -<br />

39 yrs 90% post- both - deposition of woven bone; ribs -<br />

cranial<br />

woven bone some anterior<br />

Male comp.<br />

shafts,deposition<br />

of woven bone on 12th rib; carpals - multifocal<br />

bone loss, hand phalanges - woven<br />

bone, metacarpals - abnormal shape;<br />

bilateral other long bone - humerus -<br />

sclerotic reaction, radius - swollen radial<br />

tuberosities, femur - striations; unilateral<br />

other long bone - left femur - deposition of<br />

woven bone; cervical - compression;<br />

thoracic - unifocal bone loss 9 bodies,<br />

compression; lumbar - compression,<br />

deposition of bone on spinous processes;<br />

periarticular resorptive foci - cervical -<br />

bodies & facets, thoracic - facets<br />

124 Mid Adult >50% but Slight Ribs - woven bone on some anterior, 1<br />

42 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

- unifocal bone loss;periarticular resorptive<br />

foci - cervical - bodies superior & inferior,<br />

thoracic - inferior facets of 6, superior<br />

facets 2<br />

Yng cranium<br />

Bilateral other long bone - femur -<br />

3 Adult comp. None striations;<br />

27 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

thoracic - schmorl's nodes 1 body, com-<br />

Male comp. pressed; lumbar - schmorl's nodes<br />

3 bodies; periarticular resorptive foci -<br />

cervical - superior 4 bodies<br />

Yng cranium<br />

25 Adult comp. Moderate Clavicle - left acromial end is larger than<br />

33 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

right; metacarpals - abnormal shape - wide,<br />

Male comp. twisted, hand phalanges - woven bone,<br />

bony growths; bilateral tibia - striations;<br />

unilateral tibia - right - concentration of<br />

woven bone; bilateral fibula - striations,<br />

pin pricks; bilateral other long bone - ulna -<br />

multifocal bone loss, femur - woven bone,<br />

striations; unilateral other long bone - left<br />

radius - woven bone; thoracic - unifocal<br />

multifocal bone loss 12 bodies; lumbar -<br />

unifocal multifocal bone loss 5 bodies<br />

Yng cranium<br />

35 Adult comp. None Parietal - unifocal bone loss near sagittal<br />

21 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

suture; clavicle - multifocal bone loss<br />

Male comp. sternal end - groove w/several smaller<br />

holes; carpals - unifocal bone loss; metatarsals<br />

- unifocal bone loss, foot phalangesunifocal<br />

bone loss; bilateral tibia -<br />

striations, multifocal bone loss; unilateral<br />

tibia - left - unifocal bone loss; bilateral<br />

other long bone - femur - woven bone,<br />

striations; unilateral other long bone - right<br />

ulna - unifocal bone loss; cervical -<br />

unifocal bone loss 6 bodies; thoracic -<br />

unifocal multifocal bone loss 8 bodies;<br />

lumbar - unifocal multifocal bone loss<br />

4 bodies<br />

154


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category<br />

Yng<br />

ness * * Notes<br />

39 Adult >50% but None Carpals - multifocal bone loss, hand<br />

22 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

focal bone loss 7 bodies multifocal bone<br />

loss on all, compression; lumbar - unifocal<br />

bone loss 5 bodies, multifocal bone loss<br />

on all, compression; periarticular resorptive<br />

foci - thoracic - 5 inferior facets<br />

Yng cranium<br />

69 Adult comp. None Clavicle - both - woven & sclerotic reaction<br />

29 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

acromial ends, sternal ends swollen;carpal<br />

Male comp. woven bone; metatarsals - woven bone on<br />

all 5 present; unilateral other long bone -<br />

left radius - woven bone; thoracic - T12 -<br />

multifocal bone loss on inferior body, 2<br />

facets larger, T11 - schmorl's nodes, 2<br />

larger facets, compression, T9(?) - deep<br />

lesion superior body, schmorl's node inferior<br />

body, sclerotic reaction on some; lumbar-<br />

L1 -schmorl's node inferior body, L2 -large<br />

lesion posterior body inferior, schmorl's<br />

node superior body, L4, L5 - schmorl's<br />

node inferior body, some compression;<br />

periarticular resorptive foci - cervical - 2<br />

inferior facets, thoracic - T10 & 11<br />

posterior bodies<br />

Yng cranium<br />

82 Adult comp. Slight Clavicle- left -woven bone; ribs- deposition<br />

25 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

of woven bone on shafts; metacarpals -<br />

Unde- comp. woven bone on shafts of 2; calcaneus -<br />

termined woven bone, 1st metatarsals - woven bone;<br />

bilateral tibia - woven bone, striations,<br />

osteitis; bilateral fibula - woven &<br />

sclerotic reaction; unilateral fibula - left -<br />

unifocal bone loss; bilateral other long bone<br />

humerus - osteitis, femur - striations,<br />

osteitis; unilateral other long bone - right<br />

radius - unifocal bone loss, woven bone,<br />

left ulna - concentration of woven bone,<br />

right femur - woven bone; thoracic - multifocal<br />

bone loss, woven bone anterior<br />

bodies of 2; lumbar - multifocal bone loss,<br />

compression<br />

156


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category<br />

Yng<br />

ness * * Notes<br />

83 Adult >50% but Slight Bilateral tibia -striations; bilateral other long<br />

bone - humerus -woven bone, femur -<br />

20 yrs


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

18 + yrs unifocal bone loss, talus - sequestrum;<br />

Male<br />

Yng<br />

bilateral tibia - woven bone, striations;<br />

bilateral fibula -sclerotic reaction, striations;<br />

unilateral other long bone - femur -not sure<br />

which side - striations<br />

105 Adult


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness * * Notes<br />

20 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

metatarsals - woven bone; bilateral tibia -<br />

Male comp. striations, woven bone; bilateral fibula -<br />

woven & sclerotic reaction, multifocal bone<br />

loss; bilateral other long bone - humerus -<br />

woven bone, femur - striations, woven<br />

bone; thoracic -unifocal multifocal bone<br />

lossschmorl's node on 1 inferior body;<br />

lumbar - unifocal bone loss horizontal<br />

lesions across 4 bodies<br />

cranium<br />

Clavicle -both have woven bone; ribs -<br />

89 Adol comp. Slight woven<br />

16 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

bone sternal ends; metacarpals - woven<br />

Female comp.<br />

cranium<br />

bone, hand phalanges - woven bone;<br />

calcaneus - woven bone, metatarsals -<br />

woven bone, foot phalanges - woven bone;<br />

bilateral tibia - striations, woven bone;<br />

unilateral tibia - right - unifocal bone loss;<br />

unilateral fibula - not sure which side -<br />

striations, woven bone; bilateral other long<br />

bone - femur - striations, woven bone; unilateral<br />

other long bone - left femur - unifocal<br />

bone loss, radius - not sure which side -<br />

swollen, unifocal bone loss, woven bone,<br />

ulna - not sure which side - striations,<br />

humerus - not sure which side -woven<br />

bone;<br />

cervical - unifocal multifocal bone loss;<br />

thoracic - unifocal multifocal bone loss,<br />

compression; lumbar - unifocal multifocal<br />

bone loss<br />

116 Adol comp. None Clavicle - both woven bone; ribs - woven<br />

bone on several anterior; calcaneus -<br />

16 yrs 90% postcranial<br />

woven<br />

Male comp. bone; unilateral fibula - right - woven bone;<br />

bilateral other long bone - humerus - woven<br />

bone, ulna - woven bone; unilateral other<br />

long bone - right radius - woven bone;<br />

thoracic - unifocal multifocal bone loss,<br />

schmorl's nodes on 3 bodies, compression;<br />

159


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness *<br />

cranium<br />

* Notes<br />

lumbar - L1-5 - woven & sclerotic reaction,<br />

schmorl's nodes L1,2,3 superior & inferior<br />

bodies, compression, L4 - unifocal<br />

bone loss - horizontal lesion<br />

21 Infant comp. None Bilateral other long bone - humerus - woven<br />

1.7 90% postcranial<br />

bone, swollen/flared; lumbar - unifocal bone<br />

UJ comp.<br />

cranium<br />

loss<br />

30 Infant comp. None Frontal or parietal? - woven bone inside<br />

0.2 90% postcranial<br />

w/grooves, frontal - woven bone above &<br />

UJ comp.<br />

cranium<br />

inside orbits; clavicle - don't know which<br />

side - woven bone around sternal end; ribswoven<br />

bone anterior & posterior & at both<br />

ends of some; bilateral other long bone -<br />

humerus - woven bone over most of shaftsworse<br />

at ends; unilateral other long bone -<br />

right radius - woven bone, right ulna -<br />

woven<br />

bone, right femur - woven bone<br />

32 Infant comp. None Frontal -woven bone inside orbits -extensive<br />

0.8 90% post- & other parts of frontal; clavicle - both -<br />

cranial<br />

woven bone around ends; ribs - woven<br />

UJ comp.<br />

cranium<br />

bone<br />

at ends & anterior shaft of some; metatarsals<br />

- woven bone on 1; bilateral tibia -<br />

woven bone; bilateral fibula - woven bone;<br />

bilateral other long bone - humerus - woven<br />

bone, radius - woven bone, ulna - woven<br />

bone, femur - woven bone; thoracic -<br />

unifocal<br />

bone loss; lumbar - unifocal bone loss<br />

40 Infant comp. None Frontal or parietal? - woven bone inside;<br />

0.6 90% postcranial<br />

clavicle - both - woven bone on both ends;<br />

UJ comp. ribs - woven bone on 1; bilateral other<br />

long bone - humerus - woven bone, radius -<br />

woven bone, femur - woven bone; uni-<br />

160


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness *<br />

cranium<br />

* Notes<br />

lateral other long bone -left ulna -woven<br />

bone; thoracic - unifocal bone loss;<br />

lumbar - unifocal bone loss<br />

46 Infant comp. None Clavicle - both - woven bone; ribs - woven<br />

0.1 90% postcranial<br />

bone, sternal ends appear to be swollen;<br />

UJ comp.<br />

cranium<br />

bilateral other long bone - humerus - woven<br />

bone radius - woven bone, ulna - woven<br />

bone; unilateral other long bone - left femurwoven<br />

bone; thoracic - unifocal bone loss;<br />

lumbar - unifocal bone loss<br />

62 Infant comp. None Frontal or parietal? - woven bone superior,<br />

0.4 90% postcranial<br />

frontal - woven bone inside the orbits;<br />

UJ comp.<br />

cranium<br />

clavicle - both - woven bone; ribs - woven<br />

bone, sternal ends appear to be swollen;<br />

unilateral tibia - not sure what side - woven<br />

bone; bilateral other long bone - humerus -<br />

woven bone, ulna - woven bone, femur -<br />

woven bone; unilateral other long bone -<br />

right radius - woven bone; thoracic -unifocal<br />

multifocal bone loss; lumbar -unifocal<br />

multifocal bone loss<br />

63 Infant comp. None Clavicle - not sure which side - woven bone;<br />

0.4 90% postcranial<br />

rib - woven bone anterior shafts & ends of<br />

UJ comp. some; bilateral other long bone - humerus -<br />

woven bone; unilateral other long bone -<br />

radius - not sure which side - woven bone,<br />

right ulna - woven bone; thoracic -<br />

multifocal bone loss<br />

77 Infant >50% but None Clavicle - both - woven bone at ends; ribs -<br />

1.3


APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF CARRIER MILLS ARCHAIC BURIAL SAMPLE<br />

INDIVIDUALS SHOWING POSSIBLE TREPONEMAL CHARACTERISTICS, cont.<br />

Burial Age/Sex Complete-<br />

Degree<br />

of<br />

Osteitis<br />

Num Category ness *<br />

cranium<br />

* Notes<br />

multifocal bone loss; lumbar - multifocal<br />

bone loss<br />

87 Infant comp. None Clavicle - both - woven bone at ends; ribs -<br />

0.8 90% postcranial<br />

woven bone at ends; bilateral tibia - woven<br />

UJ comp. bone; bilateral fibula - woven bone;<br />

bilateral other long bone - humerus - woven<br />

bone, unifocal bone loss, ulna -woven bone,<br />

femur - woven bone; unilateral other long<br />

bone - radius - not sure which side - woven<br />

bone; lumbar - multifocal bone loss<br />

* Taken from Bassett (1982)<br />

162


Twana Jill Golden<br />

PO Box 2382<br />

Carbondale, IL 62902<br />

October 29, 2007<br />

Center For Archaeological Investigations<br />

Southern Illinois University<br />

Carbondale, IL 62901<br />

Dear Dr. Butler:<br />

This letter will confirm our recent telephone conversation. I am completing a masters<br />

thesis at Southern Illinois University entitled “A Contribution to the Debate Over the<br />

Origin and Development of Treponemal Disease: A Case Study from Southern Illinois.”<br />

I would like your permission to reprint in my thesis maps from the following:<br />

Jefferies RW, Butler BM, editors. 1982. The Carrier Mills Archaeological<br />

Project: Human Adaptation in the Saline Valley, Illinois Volume 1. Southern<br />

Illinois University at Carbondale: Center for Archaeological Investigations,<br />

Research Paper No 33.<br />

The maps to be reproduced are:<br />

Figure 1. Location of the Carrier Mills Archaeological District in Southern<br />

Illinois. Page 4 of the volume.<br />

Figure 3. Locations of Sites in the District. Page 6 of the volume.<br />

The requested permission extends to any future revisions and editions of my thesis,<br />

including non-exclusive world rights in all languages, and to the prospective publication<br />

of my thesis. These rights will in no way restrict publication of the material in any other<br />

form by you or by others authorized by you. Your signing of this letter will also confirm<br />

that the Center for Archaeological Investigations owns the copyright to the abovedescribed<br />

material.<br />

If these arrangements meet with your approval, please sign this letter where indicated<br />

below and return it to me. Thank you very much.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

Twana Jill Golden<br />

PERMISSION GRANTED FOR <strong>THE</strong><br />

USE REQUESTED ABOVE:<br />

_________________________ Date:_______________<br />

Dr. Brian M. Butler<br />

163


VITA<br />

Graduate School<br />

Southern Illinois University<br />

Twana Jill Golden Date of Birth: January 28, 1972<br />

P.O. Box 2382, Carbondale, Illinois 62902<br />

Southeastern Illinois College at Harrisburg<br />

Associate In Applied Science, Electronic Data Processing, May 1993<br />

Southern Illinois University at Carbondale<br />

Bachelor of Arts, Anthropology, May 2004<br />

Special Honors and Awards:<br />

Scholastic Honors Award, College of Liberal Arts, Southern Illinois University<br />

Carbondale, 2003<br />

Scholastic Honors Award, College of Liberal Arts, Southern Illinois University<br />

Carbondale, 2004<br />

Excellence in Anthropology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, 2004<br />

Thesis Title:<br />

A Contribution to the Debate Over the Origin and Development of Treponemal<br />

Disease: A Case Study from Southern Illinois<br />

Major Professor: Susan M. Ford<br />

164

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!