06.06.2013 Views

Antitrust Status of Farmer Cooperatives: - USDA Rural Development ...

Antitrust Status of Farmer Cooperatives: - USDA Rural Development ...

Antitrust Status of Farmer Cooperatives: - USDA Rural Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

spect <strong>of</strong> no rules in the rail service game, it took Congress only a few<br />

months to react, passing the Interstate Commerce Act <strong>of</strong> 1887.<br />

This landmark legislation marked the first time Congress<br />

affirmatively exerted its authority under the Constitution to regulate<br />

commerce among the States. It was also the first time Congress<br />

created an independent administrative body, the Interstate Commerce<br />

Commission (ICC), to regulate trade and commerce. The ICC was<br />

charged with keeping rail rates just and reasonable.<br />

Railroad regulation in the early days <strong>of</strong> the ICC was not very<br />

effective, at least from the shipper perspective. The railroads used the<br />

ICC to raise rates on their competitive long-haul routes. And they<br />

used the courts to challenge, <strong>of</strong>ten successfully, ICC decisions they<br />

didn't like. For example, in the "Maximum Freight Rates" decision 18<br />

the Supreme Court ruled the ICC had the authority to declare rail rates<br />

reasonable or unreasonable, but not the power to prescribe future<br />

rates. ICC v. Alabama Midland Railway Co. 19 held the ICC lacked the<br />

power to prevent short-haul rates from exceeding long-haul rates on<br />

the same railroad.<br />

However, the rising influence <strong>of</strong> the progressive movement at the<br />

turn <strong>of</strong> the century, brought with it a feeling that the railroads needed<br />

more stringent public oversight. The Elkins Act <strong>of</strong> 1903 20 ended the<br />

railroads' practice <strong>of</strong> giving rebates to large corporations. The<br />

Hepburn Act <strong>of</strong> 1906 21 gave the ICC the power to set maximum rates.<br />

The Mann-Elkins Act <strong>of</strong> 1910 22 granted the ICC clear authority over<br />

long- and short-haul rate differences. 23<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> its new authority, the ICC never became a major factor<br />

in curtailing anticompetitive behavior. Changing economic conditions<br />

18 ICC v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co., 167<br />

U.S. 479 (1897).<br />

19 168 U.S. 144 (1897).<br />

20 Chap. 708, 32 Stat. 847 (1903).<br />

21 Chap. 3591, 34 Stat. 584 (1906).<br />

22 Chap. 309, 36 Stat. 539 (1910).<br />

23 All <strong>of</strong> these laws and other general rail rate regulation were repealed<br />

by the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act <strong>of</strong> 1976 (P.L . 94-<br />

210, 90 Stat. 31 (1976)) and subsequent rail deregulation legislation.<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!