19.06.2013 Views

July-August - Air Defense Artillery

July-August - Air Defense Artillery

July-August - Air Defense Artillery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The propellant temperature is measured<br />

by use of a special powder temperature<br />

thermometer at each battery p0sition.<br />

Corrections for variations are computed<br />

and applied to the present director<br />

as an effect on muzzle velocity.<br />

Of all of the principal factors affecting<br />

the internal ballistics of a projectile,<br />

only the chamber capacity is unknown,<br />

or is not measured. Assuming uniform<br />

projectile loading, which we should<br />

achieve consistently by use of an automatic<br />

rammer, the chief cause of variation<br />

in chamber capacity is due to wear<br />

and erosion; and wear and erosion of a<br />

gun bore are inherent in any type of<br />

artillery fire. The effect of an increase<br />

in chamber capacity, that is, wear of the<br />

chamber and bore, is to decrease muzzle<br />

velocity.<br />

Since information concerning expected<br />

muzzle velocity is so vital to successful<br />

gunnery, let's see how this information<br />

is obtained now. It could be obtained<br />

from a field chronograph. However,<br />

in nine years of service in antiaircraft<br />

artillery, I have never encountered<br />

the special teams to perform this operation;<br />

so the value of this method in a<br />

practical sense must be questioned. Also,<br />

since wear is constantly changing the<br />

chamber capacity, the problem of chronographing<br />

is a recurring one. Another<br />

method of determining battery developed<br />

muzzle velocity is by analysis of<br />

fire. Application of this technique is far<br />

from universal, however.<br />

Unfortunately, muzzle velocity data<br />

is all too often determined by a process<br />

known as the "educated guess" method.<br />

The difference between this guessed<br />

muzzle velocity value and the true battery<br />

developed muzzle velocity was one<br />

of the greatest of the unknown errors<br />

eliminated by trial fire corrections. If<br />

trial fire is prohibited, then we need another<br />

sound method of determining the<br />

muzzle velocity.<br />

A SoLUTION<br />

IHAVE attempted to develop the idea<br />

that, in reality, trial fire correctigns are<br />

not to eliminate "unknown errors," but<br />

are corrections which, in the main, eliminate<br />

the effects of variations from standard<br />

of conditions affecting the internal<br />

ballistics of a projectile. I have also attempted<br />

to show that of these conditions<br />

which might affect the internal ballistics<br />

of a projectile, all are kept standard, or<br />

variations from standard are known or<br />

can be measured, with the single exception<br />

of that of variation in chamber capacity<br />

due to wear and erosion. It follows<br />

then that trial fire may be substituted<br />

for where necessary by the following<br />

general procedure:<br />

1. Perform all steps of preparation for<br />

fire with the greatest accuracy in<br />

order to eliminate personnel errors.<br />

2. Make available to each battery a<br />

simple "pull-over" type bore gauge<br />

to measure the chamber and bore<br />

diameters.<br />

3. Use tables prepared by the Ordnance<br />

Department to relate a given<br />

chamber measurement to an expected<br />

muzzle velocity. If data for<br />

these tables is not already available,<br />

it could easily be obtained<br />

from experimental firing.<br />

4. From the muzzle velocity values<br />

then available for each gun, select<br />

an average muzzle velocity value to<br />

be applied to the director. It is apparent<br />

that the problem of selecting<br />

the average muzzle velocity would<br />

be greatly simplified by arranging<br />

to have guns of approximately equal<br />

wear in the same battery, and by<br />

keeping wear approximately equal<br />

within the battery by ensuring that<br />

the number of rounds fired from<br />

each gun remains roughly the<br />

same.<br />

FORT BANKS REACTIVATED BY ARMY<br />

5. Correct the average muzzle velocity<br />

value for variations from standard<br />

in propellant temperature and projectile<br />

weight.<br />

SYSTEM AS USED BY ROYAL ARTILLERY<br />

..<br />

THE gunnery system outlined above<br />

has been in use with the British Antiaircraft<br />

<strong>Artillery</strong> for several years. Corrections<br />

for external ballistics are applied<br />

directly to the predictor as in our Service.<br />

The muzzle velocity setting is dependent<br />

upon the wear of the tube and<br />

the propellant temperature, both of<br />

which are measured. Variations in<br />

weight of projectile are ignored. The<br />

wear of the tube is measured by a pullover<br />

gauge issued to each AAA troop.<br />

The bore measurement is converted to a<br />

muzzle velocity value through reference<br />

to a table in the firing table. If the muzzle<br />

velocities of all four guns do not<br />

cover more than a 25 ftjsec band, the<br />

mean muzzle velocity is taken as the<br />

battery developed muzzle velOCity.If a<br />

gun exceeds this 25 ftjsec limit on muzzle<br />

velocity difference, it is regarded as<br />

an "odd" gun; its muzzle velocity value<br />

is not used in determining a predictor<br />

setting; compensation for this greater<br />

variation is made by special corrections<br />

in elevation and fuze at the gun in a<br />

manner comparable to our calibration<br />

corrections. Once determined, the mean<br />

muzzle velocity is corrected for propellant<br />

temperature, and is then applied to<br />

the predictor.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

,<br />

Trial<br />

possible.<br />

fire should be used whenever<br />

Since trial fire will frequently be impracticable<br />

in war, the gauge method of<br />

determining battery developed muzzle<br />

velocity should be incorporated into<br />

US antiaircraft artillery teaching as an<br />

alternate means to trial fire in the preparation<br />

fur fire.<br />

Immediate reactivation of Fort Banks at Winthrop, Massachusetts,<br />

was announced by the Department of the Army.<br />

FortBanks, which will be used by antiaircraft artillery units, was declared<br />

excess to Army needs on January 31, 1950.<br />

JULY-AUGUST, 1951 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!