July-August - Air Defense Artillery
July-August - Air Defense Artillery
July-August - Air Defense Artillery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The propellant temperature is measured<br />
by use of a special powder temperature<br />
thermometer at each battery p0sition.<br />
Corrections for variations are computed<br />
and applied to the present director<br />
as an effect on muzzle velocity.<br />
Of all of the principal factors affecting<br />
the internal ballistics of a projectile,<br />
only the chamber capacity is unknown,<br />
or is not measured. Assuming uniform<br />
projectile loading, which we should<br />
achieve consistently by use of an automatic<br />
rammer, the chief cause of variation<br />
in chamber capacity is due to wear<br />
and erosion; and wear and erosion of a<br />
gun bore are inherent in any type of<br />
artillery fire. The effect of an increase<br />
in chamber capacity, that is, wear of the<br />
chamber and bore, is to decrease muzzle<br />
velocity.<br />
Since information concerning expected<br />
muzzle velocity is so vital to successful<br />
gunnery, let's see how this information<br />
is obtained now. It could be obtained<br />
from a field chronograph. However,<br />
in nine years of service in antiaircraft<br />
artillery, I have never encountered<br />
the special teams to perform this operation;<br />
so the value of this method in a<br />
practical sense must be questioned. Also,<br />
since wear is constantly changing the<br />
chamber capacity, the problem of chronographing<br />
is a recurring one. Another<br />
method of determining battery developed<br />
muzzle velocity is by analysis of<br />
fire. Application of this technique is far<br />
from universal, however.<br />
Unfortunately, muzzle velocity data<br />
is all too often determined by a process<br />
known as the "educated guess" method.<br />
The difference between this guessed<br />
muzzle velocity value and the true battery<br />
developed muzzle velocity was one<br />
of the greatest of the unknown errors<br />
eliminated by trial fire corrections. If<br />
trial fire is prohibited, then we need another<br />
sound method of determining the<br />
muzzle velocity.<br />
A SoLUTION<br />
IHAVE attempted to develop the idea<br />
that, in reality, trial fire correctigns are<br />
not to eliminate "unknown errors," but<br />
are corrections which, in the main, eliminate<br />
the effects of variations from standard<br />
of conditions affecting the internal<br />
ballistics of a projectile. I have also attempted<br />
to show that of these conditions<br />
which might affect the internal ballistics<br />
of a projectile, all are kept standard, or<br />
variations from standard are known or<br />
can be measured, with the single exception<br />
of that of variation in chamber capacity<br />
due to wear and erosion. It follows<br />
then that trial fire may be substituted<br />
for where necessary by the following<br />
general procedure:<br />
1. Perform all steps of preparation for<br />
fire with the greatest accuracy in<br />
order to eliminate personnel errors.<br />
2. Make available to each battery a<br />
simple "pull-over" type bore gauge<br />
to measure the chamber and bore<br />
diameters.<br />
3. Use tables prepared by the Ordnance<br />
Department to relate a given<br />
chamber measurement to an expected<br />
muzzle velocity. If data for<br />
these tables is not already available,<br />
it could easily be obtained<br />
from experimental firing.<br />
4. From the muzzle velocity values<br />
then available for each gun, select<br />
an average muzzle velocity value to<br />
be applied to the director. It is apparent<br />
that the problem of selecting<br />
the average muzzle velocity would<br />
be greatly simplified by arranging<br />
to have guns of approximately equal<br />
wear in the same battery, and by<br />
keeping wear approximately equal<br />
within the battery by ensuring that<br />
the number of rounds fired from<br />
each gun remains roughly the<br />
same.<br />
FORT BANKS REACTIVATED BY ARMY<br />
5. Correct the average muzzle velocity<br />
value for variations from standard<br />
in propellant temperature and projectile<br />
weight.<br />
SYSTEM AS USED BY ROYAL ARTILLERY<br />
..<br />
THE gunnery system outlined above<br />
has been in use with the British Antiaircraft<br />
<strong>Artillery</strong> for several years. Corrections<br />
for external ballistics are applied<br />
directly to the predictor as in our Service.<br />
The muzzle velocity setting is dependent<br />
upon the wear of the tube and<br />
the propellant temperature, both of<br />
which are measured. Variations in<br />
weight of projectile are ignored. The<br />
wear of the tube is measured by a pullover<br />
gauge issued to each AAA troop.<br />
The bore measurement is converted to a<br />
muzzle velocity value through reference<br />
to a table in the firing table. If the muzzle<br />
velocities of all four guns do not<br />
cover more than a 25 ftjsec band, the<br />
mean muzzle velocity is taken as the<br />
battery developed muzzle velOCity.If a<br />
gun exceeds this 25 ftjsec limit on muzzle<br />
velocity difference, it is regarded as<br />
an "odd" gun; its muzzle velocity value<br />
is not used in determining a predictor<br />
setting; compensation for this greater<br />
variation is made by special corrections<br />
in elevation and fuze at the gun in a<br />
manner comparable to our calibration<br />
corrections. Once determined, the mean<br />
muzzle velocity is corrected for propellant<br />
temperature, and is then applied to<br />
the predictor.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
,<br />
Trial<br />
possible.<br />
fire should be used whenever<br />
Since trial fire will frequently be impracticable<br />
in war, the gauge method of<br />
determining battery developed muzzle<br />
velocity should be incorporated into<br />
US antiaircraft artillery teaching as an<br />
alternate means to trial fire in the preparation<br />
fur fire.<br />
Immediate reactivation of Fort Banks at Winthrop, Massachusetts,<br />
was announced by the Department of the Army.<br />
FortBanks, which will be used by antiaircraft artillery units, was declared<br />
excess to Army needs on January 31, 1950.<br />
JULY-AUGUST, 1951 37