20.06.2013 Views

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

Chapter 2 Matter as a Mirror: Marsilio Ficino and Renaissance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Matter</strong> <strong>as</strong> a <strong>Mirror</strong> 57<br />

<strong>and</strong> non-being; the matter in the universe, which is already endowed with<br />

primary forms; <strong>and</strong> already seeded matter, which will bring forth the myriad<br />

forms. 32 In an analogous way, nature organizes matter from within, while man<br />

is capable of shaping matter only from without <strong>and</strong> in imitation of nature’s<br />

art. 33<br />

Yet, <strong>as</strong> we have seen, even according to Plato himself the position<br />

of matter within the hierarchy of being w<strong>as</strong> by no means clear. <strong>Matter</strong> may<br />

either be God’s first creation (this is the position of the Timaeus) or the lowest<br />

element in the hierarchy of being (<strong>as</strong> in the Parmenides <strong>and</strong> in the Sophistes).<br />

As <strong>Ficino</strong> writes: “And this very matter, which in the Parmenides is <strong>as</strong>signed<br />

the lowest rank in the scale of things, is in the Timaeus said to be, <strong>as</strong> it were,<br />

already created <strong>and</strong> subordinated to the architect of the world who realizes<br />

the creation.” 34<br />

This unresolved tension or equivocity of ide<strong>as</strong>, which is intrinsic<br />

to Platonic philosophy in general, indicates that the abstract philosophical<br />

discourse is inextricably bound to a metaphorical substructure. It links the<br />

concept of matter to ide<strong>as</strong> <strong>and</strong> to specifically male anxieties about origin,<br />

procreation, bodies, <strong>and</strong> the female <strong>as</strong>pect in creation. The discourse about<br />

the material world refers to a gendered structure that marks a dialectical relationship<br />

between two universal principles: male (active form) <strong>and</strong> female<br />

(matter/potentiality). Kristeller observes that:<br />

In the degree to which each object is composed of potency <strong>and</strong><br />

act, it is characterised by a p<strong>as</strong>sive element <strong>and</strong> an active element.<br />

In that sense, the relation of act <strong>and</strong> potency is applicable not<br />

only to corporeal changes but to almost all objective relations <strong>as</strong><br />

well, so acquiring a fundamental significance. […] The relation<br />

between matter <strong>and</strong> form appears therefore <strong>as</strong> a particular c<strong>as</strong>e<br />

of that relation, with the result that matter is called “potency,”<br />

form on the other h<strong>and</strong>, “act.” 35<br />

32 On this, see Allen (1989) 14; for a similar distinction of matter in its various stages<br />

of formation see OO 492–493 (De creatione rerum).<br />

33 Theologia IV, 1: I, 146–147; see Allen (1989) 144.<br />

34 In Timaeum chapt. 9, OO 1441: “Hanc utique materiam in Parmenide, ab ipso<br />

bono in ultimo rerum gradu deductam, acipit in Timeo, qu<strong>as</strong>i iam genitam et architecto<br />

mundi, ad effectum mundani operis subditam.”<br />

35 See Kristeller (1943) 40; OO 81, 349, 386–387; Collins (1974) chapts. 1 <strong>and</strong> 4.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!